Francesco Puosi 1 , Dino Leporini 2,3
description
Transcript of Francesco Puosi 1 , Dino Leporini 2,3
![Page 1: Francesco Puosi 1 , Dino Leporini 2,3](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062218/56816499550346895dd67144/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Elasticity, caged dynamics and thermodynamics: three (related) scalings of
the relaxation in glassforming systems
Francesco Puosi 1, Dino Leporini 2,3
1 LIPHY, Université Joseph Fourier, Saint Martin d’Hères, France2 Dipartimento di Fisica “Enrico Fermi”, Universita’ di Pisa, Pisa, Italia
3 IPCF/CNR, UoS Pisa, Italia
![Page 2: Francesco Puosi 1 , Dino Leporini 2,3](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062218/56816499550346895dd67144/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Debenedetti and Stillinger, 2001
Structural arrest
< u2 >1/2
Random walk: cage effect
Structural arrest and particle trapping in deeply supercooled states
Log h
(Poi
se)
![Page 3: Francesco Puosi 1 , Dino Leporini 2,3](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062218/56816499550346895dd67144/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Debenedetti and Stillinger, 2001
Structural arrest
OUTLINE
• Cage scaling: ta , h vs. Debye-Waller factor <u2>
< u2 >1/2
Structural arrest and particle trapping in deeply supercooled states
Log h
(Poi
se)
Random walk: cage effect
![Page 4: Francesco Puosi 1 , Dino Leporini 2,3](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062218/56816499550346895dd67144/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Debenedetti and Stillinger, 2001
Structural arrest
OUTLINE
• Cage scaling: ta , h vs. Debye-Waller factor <u2>
• Elastic scaling: ta , h vs. elastic modulus G
- Elastic scaling and cage scaling: <u2> vs. G/T
< u2 >1/2
Structural arrest and particle trapping in deeply supercooled states
Log h
(Poi
se)
Random walk: cage effect
![Page 5: Francesco Puosi 1 , Dino Leporini 2,3](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062218/56816499550346895dd67144/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Debenedetti and Stillinger, 2001
Structural arrest
OUTLINE
• Cage scaling: ta , h vs. Debye-Waller factor <u2>
• Elastic scaling: ta , h vs. elastic modulus G
- Elastic scaling and cage scaling: <u2> vs. G/T
• Thermodynamic scaling: ta , h vs. rg/T, (density r and temperature T )
- Thermodynamic scaling and cage scaling: <u2> vs. rg/T
< u2 >1/2
Structural arrest and particle trapping in deeply supercooled states
Log h
(Poi
se)
Random walk: cage effect
![Page 6: Francesco Puosi 1 , Dino Leporini 2,3](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062218/56816499550346895dd67144/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Debenedetti and Stillinger, 2001
Structural arrest
OUTLINE
• Cage scaling: ta , h vs. Debye-Waller factor <u2>
• Elastic scaling: ta , h vs. elastic modulus G
- Elastic scaling and cage scaling: <u2> vs. G/T
• Thermodynamic scaling: ta , h vs. rg/T, (density r and temperature T )
- Thermodynamic scaling and cage scaling: <u2> vs. rg/T
• Conclusions
< u2 >1/2
Structural arrest and particle trapping in deeply supercooled states
Log h
(Poi
se)
Random walk: cage effect
![Page 7: Francesco Puosi 1 , Dino Leporini 2,3](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062218/56816499550346895dd67144/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
<u2> = f(G/T ) <u2> = y(rg/T )
ta = F[ f(G/T )] ta = F[y(rg/T ) ]
ta = F[ <u2> ]
Elastic scaling
“universal” master curve
Thermodynamic scaling
material-dependent master curve
< u2 >1/2
Cage scaling
![Page 8: Francesco Puosi 1 , Dino Leporini 2,3](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062218/56816499550346895dd67144/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
ta = F[ <u2> ]
< u2 >1/2
Cage scaling
…echoes the Lindemann melting criterion
Hall & Wolynes 87, Buchenau & Zorn 92, Ngai 2000, Starr et al 2002, Harrowell et al 2006, Larini et al 2008…
![Page 9: Francesco Puosi 1 , Dino Leporini 2,3](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062218/56816499550346895dd67144/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Log t
Log
MSD
Log <u2>
Log t*F. Puosi, DL, JPCB (2011)
Log ta
Cage scaling: evidence from the Van Hove function
< u2 >1/2
MSD(t*) = <u2>
![Page 10: Francesco Puosi 1 , Dino Leporini 2,3](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062218/56816499550346895dd67144/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Log t
Log
MSD
Log <u2>
Log t*F. Puosi, DL, JPCB (2011)
Log ta
Cage scaling: evidence from the Van Hove function
Gs(X) (r, t*) = Gs
(Y) (r, t*) Gs(X) (r, ta ) = Gs
(Y) (r, , ta )
X, Y : generic states
< u2 >1/2
MSD(t*) = <u2>
![Page 11: Francesco Puosi 1 , Dino Leporini 2,3](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062218/56816499550346895dd67144/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Log t
Log
MSD
Log <u2>
Log t*F. Puosi, DL, JPCB (2011)
Log ta
Cage scaling: evidence from the Van Hove function
Polymer melt
Gs(X) (r, t*) = Gs
(Y) (r, t*) Gs(X) (r, ta ) = Gs
(Y) (r, , ta )
X, Y : generic states
< u2 >1/2
MSD(t*) = <u2>
![Page 12: Francesco Puosi 1 , Dino Leporini 2,3](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062218/56816499550346895dd67144/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Log t
Log
MSD
Log <u2>
Log t*F. Puosi, DL, JPCB (2011)
Log ta
Cage scaling: evidence from the Van Hove function
Polymer melt
Gs(X) (r, t*) = Gs
(Y) (r, t*) Gs(X) (r, ta ) = Gs
(Y) (r, , ta )
Jumps !
X, Y : generic states
< u2 >1/2
MSD(t*) = <u2>
![Page 13: Francesco Puosi 1 , Dino Leporini 2,3](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062218/56816499550346895dd67144/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Log
MSD
Log <u2>
F. Puosi, C. De Michele, DL, JCP 138, 12A532 (2013)
Binary mixture
Log tLog t* Log ta
Cage scaling: evidence from the Van Hove function
Gs(X) (r, t*) = Gs
(Y) (r, t*) Gs(X) (r, ta ) = Gs
(Y) (r, , ta )
X, Y : generic states
< u2 >1/2
MSD(t*) = <u2>
![Page 14: Francesco Puosi 1 , Dino Leporini 2,3](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062218/56816499550346895dd67144/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Log
MSD
Log <u2>
Log tLog t* Log ta
Cage scaling: implications
Polymer melt
< u2 >1/2
t*
MSD(t*) = <u2>
![Page 15: Francesco Puosi 1 , Dino Leporini 2,3](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062218/56816499550346895dd67144/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
A. Ottochian, C. De Michele, DL, JCP (2009)
Binary mixture, polymer melt
Cage scaling: implications
“rule of thumb 1”
Log
MSD
Log <u2>
Log tLog t* Log ta
< u2 >1/2
MSD(t*) = <u2>
![Page 16: Francesco Puosi 1 , Dino Leporini 2,3](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062218/56816499550346895dd67144/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
C. De Michele, E. Del Gado, DL, Soft Matter (2011)
Cage scaling: implications
“rule of thumb 1”
Log
MSD
Log <u2>
Log tLog t* Log ta
< u2 >1/2
Colloidal gel
MSD(t*) = <u2>
![Page 17: Francesco Puosi 1 , Dino Leporini 2,3](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062218/56816499550346895dd67144/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
C. De Michele, DL, unpublishedF. Puosi, DL, JPCB (2011)
Binary mixturePolymer melt
Cage scaling: implications
“rule of thumb 2”
t
![Page 18: Francesco Puosi 1 , Dino Leporini 2,3](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062218/56816499550346895dd67144/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Cage scaling: experimental evidence
L. Larini et al, Nature Phys. (2008)
• Master curve taken from MD simulation• 1 adjustable parameter: t0 or h0
![Page 19: Francesco Puosi 1 , Dino Leporini 2,3](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062218/56816499550346895dd67144/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
<u2> = f(G/T )
ta = F[ f(G/T )]
ta = F[ <u2> ]
Elastic scaling
< u2 >1/2
Cage scaling
Elastic models: see RMP review by Dyre (2006)
![Page 20: Francesco Puosi 1 , Dino Leporini 2,3](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062218/56816499550346895dd67144/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Log t
G(t)
Gp = G(t*)
Initial affine response, total force per particle unbalanced
F.Puosi, DL, JCP 041104 (2012)
Elastic scaling in polymer melts
N.B.:MSD(t*) = <u2>
Transient shear modulus
![Page 21: Francesco Puosi 1 , Dino Leporini 2,3](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062218/56816499550346895dd67144/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Log t
G(t)
Gp = G(t*)“Inherent” dynamics:particle moved to the local potential energy minimum
Initial affine response, total force per particle unbalanced
Fast mechanical equilibration
F.Puosi, DL, JCP 041104 (2012)
Elastic scaling in polymer melts
N.B.:MSD(t*) = <u2>
Transient shear modulus
![Page 22: Francesco Puosi 1 , Dino Leporini 2,3](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062218/56816499550346895dd67144/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
G(t)
G∞
Gp
t* ~ 1-10 ps Log tta
Affine elasticity
F.Puosi, DL, JCP 041104 (2012)
Elastic scaling in polymer melts
![Page 23: Francesco Puosi 1 , Dino Leporini 2,3](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062218/56816499550346895dd67144/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
G(t)
G∞
Gp
Log tta F.Puosi, DL, JCP 041104 (2012)
Elastic scaling in polymer melts
t* ~ 1-10 ps
![Page 24: Francesco Puosi 1 , Dino Leporini 2,3](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062218/56816499550346895dd67144/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Master curve: Log ta = a + b G/T + g [ G/T ]2 a, b, g : constants
Modulus term matters: evidence from one isothermal set
Not another variant of the Vogel-Fulcher law ta = f(T)…
Elastic scaling in polymer melts
No adjustments
![Page 25: Francesco Puosi 1 , Dino Leporini 2,3](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062218/56816499550346895dd67144/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
1/ <
u2 >Elastic scaling: building the master curve
MD simulations: polymer
G/ T
• The elastic scaling works for the Debye-Waller factor <u2>,
F.Puosi, DL, arXiv:1108.4629v1, to be submitted
![Page 26: Francesco Puosi 1 , Dino Leporini 2,3](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062218/56816499550346895dd67144/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
1/ <
u2 >
MD simulations: polymer
G/ T
• The elastic scaling works for the Debye-Waller factor <u2>,
Elastic scaling: building the master curve
F.Puosi, DL, arXiv:1108.4629v1, to be submitted
![Page 27: Francesco Puosi 1 , Dino Leporini 2,3](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062218/56816499550346895dd67144/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
1/ <
u2 >
ta = F[ <u2> ]
<u 2> = f(G/T )
MD simulations: polymer
G/ T
ta = F[ f(G/T )]
• The elastic scaling works for the Debye-Waller factor <u2>,
Elastic scaling: building the master curve
F.Puosi, DL, arXiv:1108.4629v1, to be submitted
![Page 28: Francesco Puosi 1 , Dino Leporini 2,3](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062218/56816499550346895dd67144/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
ta = F[ f(G/T )]
1/ <
u2 >
G/ T
ta = F[ <u2> ]
<u 2> = f(G/T )
Experiments
G/T • ( Tg /Gg )
• The elastic scaling works for the Debye-Waller factor <u2>,
• the experimental master curve follows from the MD simulations
Elastic scaling: building the master curve
F.Puosi, DL, arXiv:1108.4629v1, to be submitted
![Page 29: Francesco Puosi 1 , Dino Leporini 2,3](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062218/56816499550346895dd67144/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
<u2> = y(rg/T )
ta = F[y(rg/T ) ]
ta = F[ <u2> ]
Thermodynamic scaling
< u2 >1/2
Cage scaling
Thermodynamic scaling: see review by Roland et al, Rep. Prog. Phys. (2005)
![Page 30: Francesco Puosi 1 , Dino Leporini 2,3](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062218/56816499550346895dd67144/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Thermodynamic scaling in Kob-Andersen binary mixture
F. Puosi, C. De Michele, DL, JCP 138, 12A532 (2013)
• The thermodynamic scaling works for the Debye-Waller factor <u2>,
rg/T
![Page 31: Francesco Puosi 1 , Dino Leporini 2,3](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062218/56816499550346895dd67144/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Thermodynamic scaling in Kob-Andersen binary mixture
rg/T F. Puosi, C. De Michele, DL, JCP 138, 12A532 (2013)
• The thermodynamic scaling works for the Debye-Waller factor <u2>,
Cage scaling fails for ta < 1
![Page 32: Francesco Puosi 1 , Dino Leporini 2,3](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062218/56816499550346895dd67144/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Thermodynamic scaling in Kob-Andersen binary mixture
rg/T F. Puosi, C. De Michele, DL, JCP 138, 12A532 (2013)
<u 2> = y(r g/T )
ta = F[y(rg/T )]
ta = F[ <u2> ]
Cage scaling fails for ta < 1
• The thermodynamic scaling works for the Debye-Waller factor <u2>,
![Page 33: Francesco Puosi 1 , Dino Leporini 2,3](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062218/56816499550346895dd67144/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
propylen carbonate
F. Puosi, O. Chulkin, S. Capaccioli, DL to be submitted
The master curve of the thermodynamic scaling follows from the MD simulations with one adjustable parameter: the isochoric fragility
Thermodynamic scaling from Debye-Waller factor: comparison with the experiment
preliminary results
![Page 34: Francesco Puosi 1 , Dino Leporini 2,3](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062218/56816499550346895dd67144/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
< u2 >1/2
Conclusions
• Cage scaling ( ta vs <u2> ): - Results suggest that <u2> is a “universal” picosecond predictor of the a relaxation. - Tested on different MD models: polymers, binary atomic mixtures, colloidal gels…- The MD master curve fits (with one adjustable parameter) the scaling of the experimental data covering over ~ 18 decades in ta drawn by glassformers in the fragility range 20 ≤ m ≤ 190.
![Page 35: Francesco Puosi 1 , Dino Leporini 2,3](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062218/56816499550346895dd67144/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
< u2 >1/2
Conclusions
• Cage scaling ( ta vs <u2> ): - Results suggest that <u2> is a “universal” picosecond predictor of the a relaxation. - Tested on different MD models: polymers, binary atomic mixtures, colloidal gels…- The MD master curve fits (with one adjustable parameter) the scaling of the experimental data covering over ~ 18 decades in ta drawn by glassformers in the fragility range 20 ≤ m ≤ 190.
• Elastic scaling ( ta vs G/T):- Intermediate-time shear elasticity and <u2> are highly correlated.
- MD master curve ta vs G/T drawn by using the cage scaling.
- The MD master curve fits (with one adjustable parameter) the scaling of the experimental data covering over ~ 18 decades in ta drawn by glassformers in the fragility range 20 ≤ m ≤ 115.
![Page 36: Francesco Puosi 1 , Dino Leporini 2,3](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062218/56816499550346895dd67144/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
< u2 >1/2
Conclusions
• Cage scaling ( ta vs <u2> ): - Results suggest that <u2> is a “universal” picosecond predictor of the a relaxation. - Tested on different MD models: polymers, binary atomic mixtures, colloidal gels…- The MD master curve fits (with one adjustable parameter) the scaling of the experimental data covering over ~ 18 decades in ta drawn by glassformers in the fragility range 20 ≤ m ≤ 190.
• Elastic scaling ( ta vs G/T):- Intermediate-time shear elasticity and <u2> are highly correlated.
- MD master curve ta vs G/T drawn by using the cage scaling.
- The MD master curve fits (with one adjustable parameter) the scaling of the experimental data covering over ~ 18 decades in ta drawn by glassformers in the fragility range 20 ≤ m ≤ 115.
• Thermodynamic scaling ( ta vs rg/T )- <u2> scales with rg/T . Extensive MD simulations in progress- MD master curve ta vs rg/T drawn by using the cage scaling.
- Good comparison with the experimental data on a single glassformer (13 decades in ta ) by adjusting the isochoric fragility only. Work in progress…
![Page 37: Francesco Puosi 1 , Dino Leporini 2,3](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062218/56816499550346895dd67144/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
Collaborators:
• C. De Michele, Ric TD Roma• L. Larini, Ass. Prof. Rutgers University• A. Ottochian, Postdoc ’Ecole Centrale Paris• F. Puosi, Postdoc Univ. Grenoble 1• S. Bernini PhD Pisa• O. Chulkin Postdoc Odessa• M. Barucco Graduate Pisa
Credits
![Page 38: Francesco Puosi 1 , Dino Leporini 2,3](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062218/56816499550346895dd67144/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
1/ <
u2 >
G/ T
<u2 >
rg / T
![Page 39: Francesco Puosi 1 , Dino Leporini 2,3](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062218/56816499550346895dd67144/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
t* ~ 1-10 psLog t
Log ta
Log
< Dr
2 (t
) >
Log <u2>
Log t*
Log t
Log
F s (
q max
, t)
< u2 >1/2
![Page 40: Francesco Puosi 1 , Dino Leporini 2,3](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062218/56816499550346895dd67144/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
C. De Michele, F. Puosi, DL, unpublishedF. Puosi, DL, JPCB (2011)
![Page 41: Francesco Puosi 1 , Dino Leporini 2,3](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062218/56816499550346895dd67144/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
MD simulations
Density r
Temperature T
Chain length M (polymer) Potential: p, q
![Page 42: Francesco Puosi 1 , Dino Leporini 2,3](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062218/56816499550346895dd67144/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
1017 s (eta’ dell’universo)t a ~ 10 26 s< u2 >1/2
First “universal” scaling: structural relaxation time ta or viscosity h vs.Debye-Waller factor < u2> (rattling amplitude in the cage)
![Page 43: Francesco Puosi 1 , Dino Leporini 2,3](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062218/56816499550346895dd67144/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
Log
MSD
Log <u2>
Log tLog t* Log ta
Cage scaling: implications
Gs(X) (r, t*) = Gs
(Y) (r, t*) Gs(X) (r, ta ) = Gs
(Y) (r, , ta )
Polymer melt