For Regional Integration ESCWA Information & Communication Technology Division 1 19 December 2006M....

18
19 December 2006 M. Farah 1 for Regional Integration ESCWA Information & Communication Technology Division 1 FOSS: Needs and Opprtunities Mansour Farah Team Leader, ICT Policies UN- ESCWA

Transcript of For Regional Integration ESCWA Information & Communication Technology Division 1 19 December 2006M....

19 December 2006 M. Farah 1

for Regional Integration

ESCWAESCWA Information & Communication Technology DivisionInformation & Communication Technology Division

1

FOSS: Needs and Opprtunities

Mansour Farah

Team Leader, ICT Policies

UN- ESCWA

M. Farah 219 December 2006 2 2

FOSS and WSIS outcome

M. Farah 319 December 2006 3 3

FOSS in WSIS Plan of Action (Geneva)

C3. Access to information and knowledge 10.e. Encourage research and promote awareness among all

stakeholders of the possibilities offered by different software models, and the means of their creation, including proprietary, open-source and free software, in order to increase competition, freedom of choice and affordability, and to enable all stakeholders to evaluate which solution best meets their requirements.

10.i. Encourage initiatives to facilitate access, including free and affordable access to open access journals and books, and open archives for scientific information.

M. Farah 419 December 2006 4 4

FOSS in WSIS Plan of Action (Geneva)

C8. Cultural diversity and identity, linguistic diversity and local content

23.o. Governments, through public/private partnerships, should promote technologies and R&D programmes in such areas as translation, iconographies, voice-assisted services and the development of necessary hardware and a variety of software models, including proprietary, open source software and free software, such as standard character sets, language codes, electronic dictionaries, terminology and thesauri, multilingual search engines, machine translation tools, internationalized domain names, content referencing as well as general and application software.

M. Farah 519 December 2006 5 5

FOSS in WSIS Tunis Commitment

29. Our conviction is that governments, the private sector, civil society, the scientific and academic community, and users can utilise various technologies and licensing models, including those developed under proprietary schemes and those developed under open-source and free modalities, in accordance with their interests and with the need to have reliable services and implement effective programmes for their people. Taking into account the importance of proprietary software in the markets of the countries, we reiterate the need to encourage and foster collaborative development, inter-operative platforms and free and open source software, in ways that reflect the possibilities of different software models, notably for education, science and digital inclusion programmes.

M. Farah 619 December 2006 6 6

FOSS in WSIS Tunis Agenda

49. We reaffirm our commitment to turning the digital divide into digital opportunity, and we commit to ensuring harmonious and equitable development for all. We commit to foster and provide guidance on development areas in the broader Internet governance arrangements, and to include, amongst other issues, international interconnection costs, capacity building and technology / know-how transfer. We encourage the realization of multilingualism in the Internet development environment, and we support the development of software that renders itself easily to localisation, and enables users to choose appropriate solutions from different software models including open-source, free and proprietary software.

M. Farah 719 December 2006 7 7

Why Developing countries need FOSS?

M. Farah 819 December 2006 8 8

Reduced costs

For a company of 50 users: Microsoft Solution software: $87,988 FOSS Solution Software Cost: $80

Use of GNU/Linux: Intel saved $200 million Amazon saved $17million

Public sector organizations savings: Government of Sweden: $1 billion Government of Denmark: $480-$730 million

M. Farah 919 December 2006 9 9

Better security

Reasons: Availability of source code: Discovery and fixing of bugs,

proactive audits (rather than reactive audits) Focus on robustness and functionality with no compromise

for user friendliness Unix model as basis, multi-user, sharing with strong

security and permission structure, limited breach

Resulting in: High reliability tests for Red Hat Linux, Open Linux and

GNU/Linux

M. Farah 1019 December 2006 10 10

Reduced reliance on imports and avoiding political pressure

Reduction in imports means reduction in hard currency spending

Some developing countries need US government approval for software purchase

Great delays or even refusals are common

M. Farah 1119 December 2006 11 11

Vendor independence

Through open standards Standards are imbedded in the FOSS culture Greater freedom in selecting vendors, software

packages and platforms

M. Farah 1219 December 2006 12 12

Reduced software piracy

With open source software, no need for piracy and the disadvantages of such a culture

Avoiding IPR and WTO penalties

M. Farah 1319 December 2006 13 13

FOSS opportunities for developing countries

M. Farah 1419 December 2006 14 14

Developing local software capacity

Increase growth of ICT industry and exports Improved interoperability among systems Development of the knowledge society and knowledge-

based economy Reducing the digital divide

M. Farah 1519 December 2006 15 15

Better and timely localisation

Localisation is better done by local people who know their needs

Can be carried out as needed without waiting for availability of funds or proprietary products availability

Development of expertise among various communities

M. Farah 1619 December 2006 16 16

Expansion of applications

Education needs can be satisfied more quickly and efficiently

Government applications can be expanded and diversified

More vocational training applications, particularly in community telecenters

M. Farah 1719 December 2006 17 17

Partnership development

FOSS adoption policies and strategies require development of partnerships

Communities of practice and collaborative work International networking and capacity-building

M. Farah 1819 December 2006 18 18

Thank you!