Flow Improvement through the Implementation of Station Concept in SFS

IJSTE - International Journal of Science Technology & Engineering | Volume 2 | Issue 02 | August 2015 ISSN (online): 2349-784X

All rights reserved by www.ijste.org

51

Flow Improvement through the Implementation

of Station Concept in SFS

Anil A. Mahale Prof. P.M.Ravanan

M.Tech Scholar Associate Professor

Department of Production Engineering Department of Production Engineering

Veermata Jijabai Technological Institute Matunga , Mumbai

400019

Veermata Jijabai Technological Institute Matunga , Mumbai

400019

Abstract

The production industry has been experiencing a competitive environment and striving hard to find methods to reduce

manufacturing cost, waste and improve quality. Flow improvement concepts are used by the industries to reduce work in

progress inventories and also to reduce the waste for competing in the global market. Facilities layout is a systematic and

functional arrangement of different departments, machines, equipments and services in a manufacturing industry. It is essential

to have a well-developed plant layout for all the available resources in an optimum manner and get the maximum out of the

capacity of the facilities. The efficiency of production depends on how well the various machines, services production facilities

and employees amenities are located in a plant. This research paper aims to study and improve the current plant layout.. An Attempt is made to evaluate the current layout and to propose newshop layout. The ultimate goal is to speed up the process, there

by increasing productivity through a proper utilization of man and machine. In a manufacturing industry, the layout and material

flow in the shop floor decides its productivity. Material handling system also plays a key role in influencing productivity,

throughput time and cost of the product. This research work has been carried out as a flow improvement through the application

of station concept in production industry with the objective of time reduction. Efforts are made to reduce the motion waste in the

shop floor. The problems in the current layout are identified and analyzed. Then the layout is required to be modified and the

results to be compared with the current layout. The results will be an improvement in productivity. A new material handling

system has to be designed and to be developed to reduce the motion wastes and unwanted transportation.

Keywords: Flow Improvement, Stations Concept, Flow Line Layout, SAW Arrangement

________________________________________________________________________________________________________

I. INTRODUCTION

Industry Challenges A.

The manufacturing industry faces numerous challenges in todays marketplace. Some significant challenges are global competition, finding and keeping skilled labour, handling cost pressures, and adapting to different consumer needs.Among the

options for competition are price (cost), quality, delivery, service, and flexibility. Efficiency of industrial production lines is

crucial as it results in an improved production and utilization of available resources. Factors contributing to production line

efficiency are manpower utilization and machine efficiency. Measuring the machine efficiency and man power utilization should

be on-line, accurate and truthful. The management should be able to look for relevant production data and to accurately interpret

these data in order to identify the various faults at production level and to immediately take steps to improve efficiency.

However, faults are overwritten and reports are retouched with inaccurate information. An accurate and on line data management

system can ensure that these problems are overcome.

A production line is a set of sequential process established on an industrial shop floor. A production process or a

manufacturing process is the transformation of raw materials or components into finished products. The stages in a production

process involve procurement, fabrication, assembly, testing, packaging and distribution. The production or manufacturing lines

in industries can be categories into three types i.e. automated production lines, semi-automated production lines and manual production lines.The nature of a production line depends on the complexity of the manufacturing parts, the production volume,

the sensitivity of the product and cost. Industries management plan and layout their production lines according to specific production requirements.

The plant layout redesign for increase in efficiency is considered necessary because of the following reasons:1) Improper

material flow through the shop floor i.e., the current plant layout was not designed according to the process flow. 2) Extended

transportation time for material transfer.

Flow Improvement through the Implementation of Station Concept in SFS (IJSTE/ Volume 2 / Issue 02 / 009)


52

II. INDUSTRY OVERVIEW

(L&T Heavy Engineering) A.

L&T Heavy Engineering manufactures and supplies custom designed equipment to critical process industries such as fertilizer,

chemical, refinery, petrochemical, and oil & gas, as well as to sectors such as nuclear power, aerospace and defence.

Fabrication

Welding

Machining

Qa & Inspection

III. LITERATURE REVIEW

Efficiency of a plant layout can be increased by redesigning the plant layout using String diagram and Systematic layout

planning. These fundamental guidelines, when designing a plant layout are to be considered. It is the basic set of guidelines to be

followed during layout design and redesign. It provides basic details about the flow of material through the shop floor and the

interrelation of various activities. It also explains about the material flow and layout design using string diagram. [1]

One such research explains about the planning methods and procedures for various types of production facility. The type of

layout designs to be adopted and implemented during layout design and has also provided the key elements for layout design.

The type of flow of material and the requirement of basic process of redesign is also explained. [2] Many industries use activity

relationship charts (ARC) and diagrams for layout redesign and layout planning. The use of activity relationship diagram in

designing a layout has provided a basic step for layout planning. [3] Another research focuses on the problems occurred during designing flexible plant layouts for manufacturing facilities where

product demands are subject to variability. A flexible layout is one that maintains low material handling costs despite

fluctuations in the product demand levels. [4]

A research conducted in an industry explains about the warehouse redesign of a manufacturing plant Layout and also the

problems faced during the redesign of the layout. [5]

IV. SHELL FABRICATION SHOP (SFS)

In this shop, shells are manufactured with longitudinal seam welding. The shells are then transferred to other shops for further

fabrication of specific project.

Fig 1: Shell fabrication shop



53

Fig 2: Layout of SFS

The shop is divided into different stations as follows:

CNC Area

Rolling Area

Press Area

Gas Cutting Area

Shell setup and fabrication Facilities available at the shop

Hydra

Loading-Unloading Trailer

10 & 25 Ton capacity cranes

Evner Beam

V. WHAT IS SHELL?

Shell is the main body of pressure vessel.

Shells are of two types.

Cylindrical

Spherical Here in this shop, cylindrical shells are manufactured.

Fig 3: Shell



54

VI. PROCEDURE OF SHELL MAKING IN SFS

1) Plate cutting and WEP preparation 2) Edge Breaking 3) Rolling of plate 4) Longitudinal seam setup 5) Production Test Coupon Run in and run out 6) Preheating of long seam 7) Inter pass temperature:- 8) Post heating 9) Tack welding 10) Long seam setup inspection 11) Welding

Complete welding is done after tack welding. Root run and hot pass welding is generally a SMAW process. After proper depth

of welding is attained, SAW process is carried out. This happens outside of the shell. 3-4 mm bead is maintained above the shell

level thickness. After outside welding, chip back grinding is carried out from inside. Its MT or PT is done. Then the long seam

from inside of the shell is ready for chip back SAW process. Inside flush grinding is done on long seam whenever necessary.

Run in, run out and PTC are cut after welding process is completed. Now the shell is ready for after welding inspection.

Fig. 4: Root & Hotpass SMAW

Fig 5: SAW (Top view)



55

Table - 1

Time for SFS activities

Sr no. Activies Time required for each activity (Approximate)

1 Unloading of plates on floor space 45 minutes

2 Marking on plates 1 hour

3 Edge pressing 2-3.5 hours

4 Gas cutting and grinding for WEP preparation 2-3 hours

5 Rolling of plate 1-3 hours

6 Long seam Setup of shell 1-2 hours

7 Tack welding 1.5 hour

8 SAW arrangement 2 hours to 6 hours

9 Root and hot pass SMAW 3 hours

10 SAW 4 hours

11 Chip back gauging and grinding 3 hours

12 Chip back PT/MT hour

13 Chip back SAW arrangement 2-5 hours

14 Chip back SAW 2.5 hours

15 Cutting of Run in and run outs and grinding 1-2 hours

16 Rerolling of shell 2 hours

17 Dimension QC inspection 2-3hours

18 Visual testing of long seam hour

19 PT/MT of final welding hour

20 Loading on trailer for RT enclosure 1-2 hours

21 Radiography Testing 1-3 hours

22 Removal from RT enclosure 1 hour

23 Wire brush grinding hour

24 Ultrasonic Testing 2-3 hours

Total (When all facilities and manpower available-for one shell) 56 Hours

VII. SAW PROCESS AND ITS ARRANGEMENT

Submerged Arc Welding A.

Submerged arc welding is an arc welding process that fuses together the parts to be welded by heating them with one or more

electric arcs between one or more bare electrodes and the work piece. The submerged arc welding process utilizes the heat of an

arc between a continuously fed electrode and the work. The heat of the arc melts the surface of the base metal and the end of the

electrode. The metal melted off the electrode is transferred through the arc to the workpiece, where it becomes the deposited

weld metal

SAW Arrangement for Long Seam Welding in the shop B.

The scaff holding arrangement is done in the shop with the use of pipes and clamps. 2-4 riggers required for this job depending

upon size of the shell/cone. Also it depends on the available resources in the shop. Time for SAW scaffholding and track

arrangement is min of 2 hours to a whole day.

Fig. 6: General SAW arrangement for outside welding (Front view)



56

Problems Facing in SFS C.

Fig. 7: Flow process of shell making

Where At

1) Unloading and marking of plates take place 2) Edge pressing takes place 3) Edge breaking and WEP preparation takes place at this alternative positions depending upon availability of space and

manpower.

4) Rolling of plate to shell take place 5) Fabrication of shell

VIII. FLOW OF MATERIAL THROUGH DIFFERENT STATIONS IN THE SHOP (IN DETAIL)

1) Trailer comes with a plate in the shop. The plate is unloaded in a plate cutting area near press machine, where a marking on a plate is done. Also WEP of cir-seam is done here. Punching on plate is also carried out here.

2) The plate is then taken for edge pressing on press machine for 3-4 hours depending on thickness and length. 3) After edge pressing, the plate is taken to plate cutting area for long seam WEP. 4) The plate is then transferred on rolling machine where plate is rolled to make shell. 5) Rolled plate is then taken for welding of long seam in shell fabrication area. Where welding and all inspection activities

are carried out.

6) Then shell is then loaded on trailer or hydra to transfer in RT enclosure.

Problems in Flow line of Stations A.

It was observed that the floor condition was in a haphazard situation.

Materials used to travel large distance from input receiving to cartooning.

The line supervisors were not strict enough to control the quality right at the first time.

Process is carried out at random stations.

It is not a single line flow.

Rolling machine is idle for many times.

Random placing of plates in the plates in the shop due to improper spacing of other materials.

Space problem for placing the material in the shop sometimes.

Unused area of around 3m x 5m in between rolling and press machine.

Wastage of time due to random placing and handling the materials in the shop.

Crane problem due to engagement on particular job for specific period. So, a smooth, streamlined and continuous flow is really necessary to avoid all such unexpected occurrence.

Table 2 wastage of time due delay in activities

Sr. no Activities Wastage of time Delay reason

1 Unloading of plates 1-3 hours

Manpower unavailability,

Unavailability of space,

Worker rest pauses,

Previous load on machine,

2 Marking on plates 1-2 hours

3 Edge pressing 1-2 hours

4 WEP gas cutting & grinding 1-2 hours

5 Rolling of plate 1-2 hours



57

6 Set up of long seam 1-3 hours

Gas cutter unavailability,

Crane unavailability,

Shift change,

Electricity stoppage,

Transportation,

Inspection delay,

Material handling,

7 Tack welding 1 hour

8 Inspection activity 1-3 hours

9 SAW arrangement 1-6 hours

10 SMAW & SAW welding 1 hour

11 Run in Run out cutting & grinding 1-2 hours

12 Rerolling of shell 1-2 hours

13 Dimension inspection 1-3 hours

14 MT/PT 1-2 hours

15 Wire brush grinding 1 hour

16 RT 1-6 hours

17 UT 1-3 hours

Total possible delay for single shell 44 hours

Fig. 9: General breakdown of a production shift

In SFS,

Table - 3

Working and non-working durations 1 Planned shift length 12 hours

2 Planned operation time 10 hours

3 Planned downtime 2 hours

4 Actual operation time 9 hours

5 Unplanned downtime 1 hour

Wastage of Time for SAW Arrangement B.

1) Every time the size of shell is not same. So scaff holding arrangement for SAW is changed every time. 2) The scaffholding arrangement takes time of minimum 2 hrsupto a day. 3) Whole day can be taken for SAW arrangement. Because manpower availability is necessary for this. Minimum 2

Riggers are required for this job.

4) Pipes are arranged and fitted as support. 5) Loose arrangement results in accident and welding defects.

Fig 10: Top view of SAW arrangement.



58

Fig 11: Side view of SAW arrangement

IX. FUTURE WORK IN IMPROVEMENT OF LINE FLOW AND SAW ARRANGEMENT

For Flow Improvement A.

1) Line improvement (Redesign layout)of flow of product through different stations with flexible time. 2) Avoiding waiting time because of delay in previous process and able to start other work within that time. 3) Making solution on space management on floor. 4) Making automated SAW arrangement system with the use of available resources in the shop.

For SAW Arrangement B.

For SAW arrangement, scaffholding & track can be avoided, which takes lot of time upto a day. Instead automated beam

arrangement on pillers/column can be done. The arrangement would be adjustable up and down. Also rope will help to bend the

beam. SAW track will be made on beam where SAW trolly cab be put. Also small chair arrangement on beam can be done.

Otherwise separate adjustable beam for sitting welder can be done.

Fig 12: Suggestive SFS layout



59

Fig. 13: Suggestive SAW arrangement (Front view)

Fig. 14: Suggestive SAW arrangement (Side view)

Table - 4

Scope of Improvement

Sr.no. Present situation Wastage Target

(After improved flow layout) Minimum/Nill wastage

1. Total possible time wastage for one shell

making 44 hours

Less delayfor one shell

making Within 10 hours

2 Not a continuous flow. 1-2 hours for every activity Continuous flow Within 1 hour

3 Placing of plates at random places due

unavailability of space and other reasons

Large Floor space. (twice to

thrice of actual space)

Placing of plates at

particular place.

Only required space

will be taken.

4 Crane unavailability due to improper

material flow. 2-3 hours

Crane availability due to

proper material flow Within 15 minutes

5 SAW arrangement time

And space requirement

More Manpower + Time

uptoone day + arrangement

material

Automated SAW arrangement

Manpower only 1

person + Time

reducedupto 1 hour

6 Material handling time within shop 2-3 hours Reduced material handling

time. hour

X. RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS

This study has provided a good exposure to facility planning and layout designs for the improvement of the efficiency. The

choice of which type of facility layout to adopt can have a significant impact on the long-term success of a SFS. Instead of

criterion of minimizing total distance travelled, one may wish to minimize the total distance of the material travelled.

Applying the new workstation design will improve the productivity significantly. By improving flow line, production process

will be continuous. Wastage of time will be reduced. Less attention will be required after this improvement. Shop can avoid



60

more manpower and skilled labour. The potential benefits from the implementation and utilization of a flexible line flow and

SAW arrangement will results in:

Less Waste

Fewer Workstations

Quicker Changes of Tools, Dies, and Stamping Machinery

Reduced Downtime

Better Control Over Quality

Reduced Labour

More Efficient Use of Machinery

Work-In-Process Inventory Reduced

Increased Capacity

Increased Production Flexibility

REFERENCES

[1] R Muther, Systematic Layout planning, McGraw, 1955 [2] S. Tenwong et al., Productivity improvement for the lamp manufacturing, a dissertation for Masters degree in Manufacturing Systems Engineering,

School of Engineering, King Mongkuts University of Technology Thonburi, 1991. [3] S. Yookkasemwong, S. Pitchaya-anankul and AreeratBussarakamwadee, Process Improvement for increasing efficiency of Cable Box Process, a project

for Bachelors degree in Industrial Engineering, School of Engineering, King Mongkuts University of Technology Thonburi, 2005. [4] M. Khansuwan and C. Poowarat, A Study on Plant Layout Improvement: A Case Study at Kritchai Mechanical Company Ltd., a project for Bachelors

degree in Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Thammasat University, 1999. [5] T. Sucharitkul et al., The feasibility study and aluminium foundry plant layout design : a case study : Sathien Plastic and Fibre, a dissertation for Masters

degree in Manufacturing Systems Engineering, School of Engineering, King Mongkuts University of Technology Thonburi, 1999.

Flow Improvement through the Implementation of Station Concept in SFS

Documents

Transcript of Flow Improvement through the Implementation of Station Concept in SFS