Flavour Physics - Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleareifae2006/talks/Plenarie/Silvestrini.pdf ·...

60
Luca Silvestrini Page 1 IFAE, 21/4/2006 Flavour Physics Stefano Giagu & Luca Silvestrini Introduction Recent experimental & theoretical developments: Kaon physics (M. Dreucci, P. Massarotti) B physics (P. Gambino, T. Cartaro, N. Neri, E. Baracchini, M. Morello) B S,C physics (P. Santorelli, R. Ferrandes, G. Salamanna, G. Passaleva) Impact on the SM and beyond: Unitarity triangle analysis in the SM and beyond (V. Vagnoni) Constraints on SUSY parameters (V. Porretti, P. Paradisi) Conclusions Outlook: the role of flavour physics in the era of LHC

Transcript of Flavour Physics - Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleareifae2006/talks/Plenarie/Silvestrini.pdf ·...

  • Luca Silvestrini Page 1IFAE, 21/4/2006

    Flavour Physics Stefano Giagu & Luca Silvestrini

    Introduction Recent experimental & theoretical developments:

    Kaon physics (M. Dreucci, P. Massarotti)B physics (P. Gambino, T. Cartaro, N. Neri, E. Baracchini, M. Morello)BS,C physics (P. Santorelli, R. Ferrandes, G. Salamanna, G. Passaleva)

    Impact on the SM and beyond: Unitarity triangle analysis in the SM and beyond (V. Vagnoni) Constraints on SUSY parameters (V. Porretti, P. Paradisi)ConclusionsOutlook: the role of flavour physics in the era of LHC

  • Luca Silvestrini Page 2IFAE, 21/4/2006

    INTRODUCTION The Standard Model works beautifully up to a few hundred GeV's, but it must be an effective theory valid up to a scale Λ Mplanck:

    EW scale

    Has accidental symmetries

    Violates accidental symmetries

  • Luca Silvestrini Page 3IFAE, 21/4/2006

    How can we explore NP with processes involving only SM particles?

    I. Electroweak gauge symmetry spontaneously broken tree-level relations between EW observables (masses, couplings, ...)

    quantum corrections computable and sensitive to higher-dim operators

    The LEP glorious legacy of precision EW fits: Λ > 2-10 TeV!!

    HOW TO PROBE NEW PHYSICS:I. ELECTROWEAK SYMMETRY BREAKING

  • Luca Silvestrini Page 4IFAE, 21/4/2006

    Three flavours of fermions with same gauge quantum numbers but different mass.

    Flavour eigenstates are not weak interaction eigenstates weak interactions change flavour

    Accidental symmetry of the SM: Neutral current weak interactions conserve flavour at the tree level, GIM suppression of loop contributions

    quantum corrections computable and sensitive to higher-dim operators

    FLAVOUR & CP VIOLATION IN THE SMHOW TO PROBE NEW PHYSICS:

    II. FLAVOUR PHYSICS

  • Luca Silvestrini Page 5IFAE, 21/4/2006

    • All flavour violation from charged current coupling: CKM matrix V

    • and A from CC decays – tree-level, SM• Top quark exchange dominates FCNC loops:

    third row (Vtq) determines FCNC's sensitive to new physics

    V CKM= 1−2

    2 A3−i

    − 1−2

    2A2

    A31−−i −A2 1O 4

    _ _

  • Luca Silvestrini Page 6IFAE, 21/4/2006

  • Luca Silvestrini Page 7IFAE, 21/4/2006

  • Luca Silvestrini Page 8IFAE, 21/4/2006

  • Luca Silvestrini Page 9IFAE, 21/4/2006

  • Luca Silvestrini Page 10IFAE, 21/4/2006

    Error anatomy of BRγ

    Total error 8% dominated by charm mass Can be partially resolved by NNLO

    Misiak, PG 2001

    mc enters the phase factordue to normalization

    = 0.581±0.017

    and the NLO matrix elements

    Misiak & PG

    Talk by P. Gambino

  • Luca Silvestrini Page 11IFAE, 21/4/2006

    NNLO status report

    Misiak, Moriond 2006

  • Luca Silvestrini Page 12IFAE, 21/4/2006

    Forward-Backward asymmetry in B K* l+ l-

  • Luca Silvestrini Page 13IFAE, 21/4/2006

    Babar:

    Belle:

  • Luca Silvestrini Page 14IFAE, 21/4/2006

    Talk by M. Morello

  • Luca Silvestrini Page 15IFAE, 21/4/2006

    Talk by N. Neri

  • Luca Silvestrini Page 16IFAE, 21/4/2006

    Talk by M. Morello

  • Luca Silvestrini Page 17IFAE, 21/4/2006

  • Luca Silvestrini Page 18IFAE, 21/4/2006

  • Luca Silvestrini Page 19IFAE, 21/4/2006

  • Luca Silvestrini Page 20IFAE, 21/4/2006

    A handle on non-factorizing BS decays using SU(3)

    Talk by R. Ferrandes

  • Luca Silvestrini Page 21IFAE, 21/4/2006

    R. Ferrandes

  • Luca Silvestrini Page 22IFAE, 21/4/2006

    Bc decays in a quark model

    P. Santorelli

  • Luca Silvestrini Page 23IFAE, 21/4/2006 P. Santorelli

  • Luca Silvestrini Page 24IFAE, 21/4/2006Talk by G. Salamanna

  • Luca Silvestrini Page 25IFAE, 21/4/2006 G. Salamanna

  • Luca Silvestrini Page 26IFAE, 21/4/2006 G. Salamanna

  • Luca Silvestrini Page 27IFAE, 21/4/2006

  • Luca Silvestrini Page 28IFAE, 21/4/2006 G. Salamanna

  • Luca Silvestrini Page 29IFAE, 21/4/2006

  • Luca Silvestrini Page 30IFAE, 21/4/2006 G. Salamanna

  • Luca Silvestrini Page 31IFAE, 21/4/2006

  • Luca Silvestrini Page 32IFAE, 21/4/2006 G. Salamanna

  • Luca Silvestrini Page 33IFAE, 21/4/2006

  • Luca Silvestrini Page 34IFAE, 21/4/2006 G. Salamanna

  • Luca Silvestrini Page 35IFAE, 21/4/2006

    From UTfit:

  • Luca Silvestrini Page 36IFAE, 21/4/2006

    BR(bcl), BR(BD(*)l)

    BR(bul), BR(Bl)

    md, md/ms

    ACP(bccs) (J/ K, ...)

    ACP(bddd, uud) (, )

    BR(bcud, cus) (DK, ...)

    BR(B)

    BR(B)/BR(B)

    K (CP violation in K mixing)

    Flavour summarized on the plane

    _

    _

    _ _

    CC

    CC

    NC

    CC

    CC/NC

    CC

    CC

    NC

    NC

    _

  • Luca Silvestrini Page 37IFAE, 21/4/2006

  • Luca Silvestrini Page 38IFAE, 21/4/2006

  • Luca Silvestrini Page 39IFAE, 21/4/2006

  • Luca Silvestrini Page 40IFAE, 21/4/2006

  • Luca Silvestrini Page 41IFAE, 21/4/2006

    Using:md, ms, |Vub/Vcb|, sin 2CP violation in B mixing (new from BaBar):

    PRELIMINARYAccuracy comparableto the SM fit!

  • Luca Silvestrini Page 42IFAE, 21/4/2006

    C=1.15±0.13[0.97,1.55]SM: C=1

    CBd=1.38±0.45[0.69,2.54]

    d [°]=-4.0±2.2[-8.2,0.8]

    Get a nonvanishing Bd because of SMfit discrepancyCBs now constrained by msBs still unconstrained

    PRELIMINARY

  • Luca Silvestrini Page 43IFAE, 21/4/2006

  • Luca Silvestrini Page 44IFAE, 21/4/2006

    N. Neri

  • Luca Silvestrini Page 45IFAE, 21/4/2006

    THE MSSM

    • In the MSSM, two classes of contributions to FCNC's:● Supersymmetrization of SM contributions (W w, t t) + H

    ● pure SUSY contributions: g – q • second class requires new sources of flavour

    violation in squark mass matrices

    ~ ~

    ~ ~

    Hall, Kostelecky & Raby; Gabbiani et al.

  • Luca Silvestrini Page 46IFAE, 21/4/2006

    A Model-Independent Analysis

    • We consider a MSSM with generic soft SUSY-breaking terms, but– dominant gluino contributions only– mass insertion approximation

    four insertions AB=LL, LR, RL, RRNow full NLO available!

    d Ai d B

    jδd ij AB

    Talk by V. Porretti

    Think of 's as SUSYequivalent of CKM mixing

  • Luca Silvestrini Page 47IFAE, 21/4/2006

    CONSTRAINTS ON 's• contribute to Kaon mixing:

    constraints from ΔmK & εK• contribute to B mixing:

    constraints from ΔmB & sin2β

    • contribute to Bs mixing and b s decays: constraints from ΔmBs, b s, b sl+l-

    • for reference, choose mgl=msq=350 GeV

    δd 12 ABδd 13AB

    δd 23 AB

  • Luca Silvestrini Page 48IFAE, 21/4/2006

  • Luca Silvestrini Page 49IFAE, 21/4/2006

    THE SUSY FLAVOUR PROBLEM

    • Strong constraints on SUSY breaking mechanism:–Flavour-universal breaking?–Flavour symmetry?

  • Luca Silvestrini Page 50IFAE, 21/4/2006

  • Luca Silvestrini Page 51IFAE, 21/4/2006

    Talk by F. Mescia

  • Luca Silvestrini Page 52IFAE, 21/4/2006

    LHCb performance with 2fb-1 (1 year)

    C7eff/C9eff with 13% errorNP search

    σ(ACPdir) ≈ 0.01

    σ(sin2β) ≈ 0.022

    0.01 ps-1

    σ(φs) ≈ 2°

    σ(α) ≈ 10°

    σ(γ) ≈ 14°

    σ(γ) ≈ 6°

    σ(γ) ≈ 8°

    σ(γ) ≈ 5°

    Precision

    σ(sin2β) ≈ 0.018

    CDF17.33±0.35 ps-1

    σ(α) ≈ 7-15°

    σ(γ) ≈ 6.5°

    B-factories 2ab-1

    0.8216kBd → J/ΨKSβ

  • Luca Silvestrini Page 53IFAE, 21/4/2006

    LHC performance after 5 years

    After 5 years: σ SM expectation

    φs(Bs→ ccss) ~0.013 ∼0.035

    Br(Bs→ µ+µ−) ~0.7×10−9 ~3.5×10−9

    γ (DsK, DK) ~1° ~60° (tree only) γ (ΚΚ+ππ) ~2° ~60° (tree + penguin)

    Talk by G. Passaleva

  • Luca Silvestrini Page 54IFAE, 21/4/2006

    CONCLUSIONS• Recent data from B-factories and the Tevatron

    close the possibility of order-of-magnitude NP effects.

    • New sources of CPV can still be present in b->s transitions: need LHCb + superB.

    • In a few years, will constrain NP at the 10% level in all sectors. Theoretical accuracy approaching the SM one.

    • Flavour problem open: still miss explanation of flavour structure (and of apparent MFV)

  • Luca Silvestrini Page 55IFAE, 21/4/2006

    THE ROLE OF FLAVOUR PHYSICS IN THE LHC ERA

    • Most probably see some NP at LHC, but not the full spectrum of NP particles;

    • Even if full spectrum seen, still many parameters to be determined;–Need flavour physics as much as LC

    • Flavour remains the most powerful probe of scales higher than the reach of LHC

  • Luca Silvestrini Page 56IFAE, 21/4/2006

    EXAMPLE I: LFV @ LARGE tan

  • Luca Silvestrini Page 57IFAE, 21/4/2006

  • Luca Silvestrini Page 58IFAE, 21/4/2006

    EXAMPLE II: SUSY-GUTs

    • In an SU(5)-like GUT, quark and leptons are unified, so also squark and sleptons.

    • After running down to weak scale, one has:

    • Correlations between quark & lepton FCNC!

  • Luca Silvestrini Page 59IFAE, 21/4/2006

    Im (d23)RR vs. Re (d23)RR

    any BR τ μγ

    m q=m g350 GeV

    BR τ μγ 6⋅10−7

    BR τ μγ 1⋅10−7 BR τ μγ 1⋅10−8

    Ciuchini et al, PRL

  • Luca Silvestrini Page 60IFAE, 21/4/2006

    Flavour physics in the LHC era will play a leading role in determining the relevant NP

    model parameters, in exploring higher energies and in providing us with clues on the

    physics at MGUT.