FINITE ELEMENT SIMULATION OF THREE SURGICAL...
-
Upload
truongtruc -
Category
Documents
-
view
212 -
download
0
Transcript of FINITE ELEMENT SIMULATION OF THREE SURGICAL...
FINITE ELEMENT SIMULATION OF THREE SURGICAL TREATMENTS OFDISTAL RADIUS INTRA-ARTICULAR FRACTURE
ARASH NASROLLAHI SHIRAZI
A report submitted in partial fulfillment of therequirements for the award of the degree of
Master of Engineering (Mechanical)
Faculty of Mechanical EngineeringUniversiti Teknologi Malaysia
NOVEMBER 2010
iii
To my beloved mother and father, Fakhrosadat Banaroei and Mohsen Nasrollahi
Shirazi and my brother and sister, Pooyan and Sanaz for their never ending support.
Thank you for everything.
iv
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
To complete this Master Degree Project report, I learned many useful
softwares and I had received a lot of information and valuable guidance from my
supervisor, Assoc Prof. Eng. Dr. Rafiq Abdul Kadir. His knowledge and proficiency
in Biomechanics supported and encouraged me to complete this project.
I respect and thank my beloved family Mrs. Fakhrosadat Banaroei and Mr.
Mohsen Nasrollahi Shirazi, my sibeling, Mr. Amir and Mrs Fateme for their
constantly love and support.
I would like to thank my precious friends Mr. Jamal Kashani, Mr. Nazri
Bajuri, Mr. Amir Hossein Goharian, Mr.Ali Falahi and his wife Mrs. Mina Alizade,
Mr. Ahmadreza Abassi, Mrs. Eliza yusup, Mr. Raja and all who concerned with my
project or not and for their moment that they shared with me in joys and difficulties.
v
ABSTRACT
Distal radius fractures are the most common injuries, with an estimate overall
crude incidence of 36.6/10,000 person-year in women and 8.9/10,000 person years in
men. Assuming a continuous rise in the incidence of distal radius fractures with age,
and based on the fact that older population continues to grow, incidence of distal
radius fractures can be expected to increase. Different surgical methods can be used
to fix the complicated, unstable and displaced distal radius fractures. The
conventional surgical method with volar plating has been described the good results
in young patient. However, the elderly patients especially who has the osteoporotic
bone may have higher risk of loss of reduction in conventional types of fixation. The
aim of this study is to compare the latest treatment angle-stable constructs with
conventional model for unstable three fragmental intar-articular distal radius fracture
(AO 23-C2.1) under various load conditions using finite element analysis in order to
find the stiffer surgical methods to facilitate the anatomic reduction and maintenance
of the reduction. The fixation methods consist of 1 I-shape styloid plate and 1
intermediate dorsal plate (Group 1), single T-shape volar plate (Group 2) and 1 I-
shape styloid plate and single T-shape volar plate (Group 3). This study analysed the
rigidity base on linear load-displacement graph. To compare the rigidity, the fixation
methods analysed under the applied loads (axial-loads, bending and torsion). The
displacement and von Mises stress values showed the superior stability and rigidity
for angle-stable double plates constructs.
vi
ABSTRAKT
Tulang yang patah pada bahagian distal radius adalah kecederaan yang paling
umum, dengan anggaran kasar secara keseluruhan sebanyak 36.6 bagi setiap 10, 000
orang (perempuan) dan 8.9 bagi setiap 10 000 orang (lelaki) setiap tahun.
Pertambahan kes dijangka akan terus berlaku lantaran wujudnya pertambahan warga
tua (berikutan peningkatan taraf kesihatan) yang pastinya lebih terdedah kepada
kecederaan tulang, Terdapat banyak kaedah yang boleh digunakan bagi merawat
masalah kepatahan tulang radius distal Kaedah pembedahan konvensional dengan
menggunakan plat pada bahagian volar telah memberi impak yang baik pada pesakit
muda tetapi tidak kepada pesakit tua, terutama yang menghidap penyakit
osteoporosis. Tujuan kajian ini adalah untuk membuat perbandingan antara kaedah
terbaru iaitu sudut-stabil baru konstruk dengan model konvensional bagi merawat
kes kepatahan tulang bercirikan ‘unstable three fragmental intar-articular distal
radius fracture’ (AO 23-C 2.1). Analisis ini menggunakan kaedah simulasi komputer
dengan menggunakan ‘Finite element ’ bertujuan mencari kaedah terbaik dalam
mennghasilkan kaedah fiksasi yang lebih kukuh. Terdapat tiga kumpulan utama bagi
kaedah fiksasi, iaitu penggunaan satu plat styloid berbentuk I dan satu plat pada
bahagian pertengahan dorsal (Kumpulan 1), penggunaan satu plat di bahagian volar
berbentuk T (Kumpulan 2) dan penggunaan satu plat berbentuk I pada bahagian
styloid dan satu plat berbentuk T pada bahagian volar (Kumpulan 3). Analisa ke atas
kekukuhan struktur dibuat berdasarkan graf beban-perpindahan linier. Bagi tujuan
itu, kaedah fiksasi dikaji dengan menggunakan keadaan beban yang pelbagai (paksi-
beban, lentur dan torsi). Hasil daripada kajian ini (berdasarkan nilai tekanan von
Mises dan juga perubahan bentuk) menunjukkan bahawa plat ganda sudut-stabil
pembinaan yang menggunakan dua plat adalah lebih baik dari segi kekukuhan
struktur berbanding penggunaan hanya satu plat sahaja.
vii
TABLE OF CONTENT
CHAPTER TITLE PAGE
TITLE i
DECLARATION ii
DEDICATION iii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS iv
ABSTRACT v
ABSTRAK vi
TABLE OF CONTENTS vii
LIST OF TABLES xi
LIST OF FIGURES xii
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS xiv
1 INTRODUCTION 1
1.1 Introduction 1
1.1.1 Wrist anatomy 1
1.1.1.1 Bones and joints 2
1.2 Wrist fracture 3
1.2.1 Distal radius fracture 3
1.3 Problem Statement 4
1.4 Objective of Study 5
1.5 Scope of study 5
viii
2 LITERATURE REVIEW 6
2.1 Introduction 6
2.1.1 Classification of intra-articular fracture 6
(1) Intra-articular fracture with displaced
dorsal fragment7
(2) Dorsal split with dorsal dislocation 7
(3) palmar split with palmar dislocaton 8
(4) Complex distal radius fractures with
metaphyseal separation9
(5) Destruction of the articular surface 9
2.2 Different studies on fixation methods 10
2.2.1 Clinical Method 10
2.2.1.1 Non-invasive Techniques 11
2.2.1.1.1 Conservative treatment 11
2.2.1.1.2 External Fixation 12
2.2.1.1.3 Pining 13
2.2.1.2 Open surgery 14
(a) Plates 14
(b) Fragment-specific Fixation 15
(c) Volar locking plates 16
2.2.2 Protocol for surgical treatment 17
2.3 Experimental Method 18
2.3.1 A novel non-bridging external fixator versus
volar angular stable plating19
2.3.2 Comparing volar with dorsal fixation plates on
unstable extra-articular fractures20
2.4 Computer Simulation Method 22
2.4.1 Biomechanical evaluation of three types of
implants 22
3 METHODOLOGY 27
ix
3.1 Introduction 27
3.2 Mimics Software 27
Step 1: Imported the medical data 28
Step 2: Thresholding 29
Step 3: Segmentation density masks 29
Step 4: Region growing 30
Step 5: 3D Reconstruction 31
3.2.1 Constructed of fractured bone 32
3.3 Implant Design 35
3.3.1 Introduction of Solidworks Software 35
3.3.2 Designing the implants 36
3.4 Simulation of surgical fixation 37
3.5 Introduction to MSC.Marc Software 39
3.5.1 Analysing the three fixation methods 40
3.5.2 Applying the loads 41
4 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 43
4.1 Introduction 43
4.2 Axial-loads results 44
4.2.1 Displacement 44
4.2.2 Von-Mises Stress 46
4.3 Bending results 49
4.3.1 Displacement 49
4.3.2 Von-Mises Stress 51
4.4 Torsional results 53
4.4.1 Displacement 54
4.4.2 Von-Mises Stress 55
4.5 Overviewing of three three fixation methods 58
4.6 Validation of study 60
4.6.1 Surgical validation 60
4.6.2 Experimental validation 60
x
5 DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATION 62
5.1 Discussion 62
5.2 Recommendations 63
REFERENCES 64
xi
LIST OF TABLES
TABLE NO. TITLE PAGE
4.1 Maximum displacement (mm) and maximum vonMises stress (MPa) values of the bone around thescrews of all three groups under the applied loads
47
4.2 Maximum displacement (mm) and maximum vonMises stress (MPa) values of the bone around thescrews of all three groups under the bending loads
52
4.3 Maximum displacement (mm) and maximum vonMises stress (MPa) values of the bone around thescrews of all three groups under the torsionalloads
57
xii
TABLE OF FIGURES
FIGURE NO. TITLE PAGE
1.1 Distal and proximal rows of carpal bones 2
2.1 CT-based classification of comminuted intra-articular
fractures of the distal radius. Type I: intra-articular
fracture with displaced dorso-ulnar fragment
7
2.2 Type II: dorsal split with dorsal dislocation 8
2.3 Type III: palmar split with palmar dislocation 8
2.4 Type IV: complex distal radius fractures with
metaphyseal separation
9
2.5 Type V: destruction of the articular surface 10
2.6 Schematic drawing of a monolateral external fixator
with double ball joints after application to the radial
aspect of the second metacarpal and diaphysis of
the radius: the distal ball joint is centred between
the capitate (C) and lunate bone (L) (intraoperatively
by identification with a bone elevator under image
intensification, lower part of the image) to allow for
mobilisation of the fixator.
13
xiii
2.7 Typical placement of two T-pins for fixation a distal
radius fracture is shown in this posterior-anterior
radiograph. The surgeon has inserted two T-pins from
the radio styloid to stable fracture fixation. The
surgeon has inserted two T-pins from the radio styloid
to stable fracture fixation
14
2.8 A fragment-specific wrist fixation system 15
2.9 A 31-year-old woman with reverse Barton fracture
fixed by volar locking plate
16
2.1O The southern Sweden treatment protocol for DRF
when selecting different treatments the patient’s age
and demands
18
2.11 Experimental test with isolated radius placed of
custom-made compensator to applied ratio (60-40%)
of the forces transferred to scaphoid and lunata
fragments. (A) Non-bridging external fixation method.
(B) Volar locking fixation method
19
2.12 (A)The LDRS 2.4-mm intermediate and styloid plates.
(B)The LDRS 2.4-mm volar plate.
(C)The LDRS 2.4-mm volar and styloid plates.
(D) The 3.5-mm stainless steel T plate.
21
2.13 Finite element of different surgical methods. (A) T
shape single volar plate meshing model. (B) Meshing
model of double-palates fixation method. (C) The
modified double-plating (MDP) meshing model
23
xiv
2.14 Loading conditions for model. Axial loading bending
and torsion are indicated with arrows. The axial
loading was applied in the middle of the upper radius
surface. The bending force was applied on the volar
side of radius. Torsion is applied on both sides of the
radius representing the external rotating force
24
2.15 (A) Average total displacement of the fracture site
under 50 N axial compression, 2 N-m bending and 2
N-m torsion loads. (B) Maximum displacement of the
fracture site under 50 N axial compression, 2 N-m
bending and 2 N-m torsion loads
25
2.16 (A) Maximum von Mises stress value for bone in
single, DP, and MDP models under 50 N axial
compression, 2 N-m bending and 2 N-m torsional
loads. (B) Maximum von Mises stress value of T plate
in single, DP, and MDP models under 50 N axial
compression, 2 N-m bending and 2 N-m torsional loads
26
3.1 CT scan image for using in mimic 28
3.2 The top and side views for radius bone that
Thresholding by the white color triangular to separate
the radius bone
29
3.3 The side view of region growing that shown in pink
color
30
3.4 The process of smoothing (A, B and C) to achieve
radius bone
31
3.5 The measured guide lines for cutting (A)
Approximately 10 mm(10.44 mm) from the from
articular surface. (B) About 15° (14.81°) volar wedge
33
xv
3.6 The simulated three segments unstable intra-articular
fracture (AO 23-C2.1 fracture). The circle shows the
cut with the curve tool
33
3.7 (A) The scaphoid segment cleaned meshes.
(B) The lunate segment cleaned meshes. (C) The distal
part of the radius cleaned meshes (all segment related
to the cortical parts only)
34
3.8 (A) Intermediate dorsal LDRS 2.4 mm plate. (B) Volar
T-shape LDRS 2.4 mm plate. (C) I-shape Styloid
LDRS 2.4 mm plate
37
3.9 Fixed all the meshes around the screws on both cortical
and cancellous parts of bone
38
3.1O Fixed all the interfaced meshing part between all
cancellous and cortical and screws. (The red parts
show the interfaced parts)
39
3.11 Defined the young’s modulus, Poisson’s ratio and
contact parts for each part (that showed in collared
parts)
40
3.12 Axial loading that applied on scaphoid and lunate
regions base on each percentage and tilt angle, bending
load that exerted on simulated bone on volar side of the
radius and the torsion applied of the radius part of the
bone
42
4.1 Model rigidity under axial compressive load 45
4.2 Maximum displacement of the bone around the screws
under the 10 N, 25 N, 50N, and 100 N loads
45
xvi
4.3 Maximum von-Mises stress under the 10 N, 25 N, 50N
and 100 N loads
46
4.4 Maximum von-Mises stress of the bone around the
screws under the 10 N, 25 N, 50N, and 100 N loads
47
4.5 The contour plots of displacement for three groups of
fixations under applied 100 N axial load
48
4.6 The mean maximum displacement under bending loads
(1 N-m, 1.5 N-m, 2 N-m)
50
4.7 The maximum displacement around the screws under
applied bending loads (1 N-m, 1.5 N-m, 2 N-m)
50
4.8 The maximum von-Mises stress under applied bending
loads (1 N-m, 1.5 N-m, 2 N-m)
51
4.9 The maximum von-Mises stress around the screws
under applied bending loads (1 N-m, 1.5 N-m and
2 N-m)
51
4.1O The contour plots of displacement for three groups of
fixations under applied 2 N bending load
53
4.11 The mean maximum displacement under torsion loads
(1.5 N-m, 2 N-m, 2.5 N-m)
54
4.12 The maximum displacement around the screws under
applied torsion loads (1.5 N-m, 2 N-m, 2.5 N-m)
55
4.13 The maximum von-Mises stress under applied bending
loads (1.5 N-m, 2 N-m and 2.5 N-m)
56
4.14 The maximum von Mises stress around the screws
under applied torsion loads (1.5 N-m, 2 N-m and
2.5 N-m)
56
xvii
4.15 The contour plots of displacement for three groups of
fixations under applied 2 N torsional load
58
4.16 (A) Average total displacement of the fracture site
under the 100 N axial compression, 2 N-m bending
and 2.5 N-m torsional loads. The total displacement
was averaged from the displacement of the nodes on
the fracture site. (B) Maximum von Mises stress value
for bone in three groups of fixations under 100 N
compression load, 2 N-m bending and 2.5 N-m
torsional loads
59
xviii
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
2D - Two Dimensional
3D - Three Dimensional
CAD - Computer-Aided design
CT - Computerized Tomography
DRFs - Distal Radius Fractures
DP - Double Plating
FEA - Finite Element Analysis
HU - Hounsfield Scale
LCPS - Locking Compression Plate System
LCPS - Locking Compression Plate System
LDRS - Locking Distal Radius System
MDP - Modified Double Plating
MRI - Magnetic Resonance Imager
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
1.1 Wrist joint
Wrist joint is the most complex of all joints in the body. The wrist must be
extremely mobile to give our hands a full range of motion. At the same time, the wrist
must provide the strength for heavy gripping. The kinematics and kinetics of the wrist
hasn’t been completely understood yet. The wrist joint plays a significant role in
maintaining a normal daily life. Normal wrist motions involve with the ligaments as well
as the carpal, radius and ulna bones [1].
1.1.1 Wrist anatomy
Wrist structure can be divided in to several categories:
2
• bones and joints
• ligaments and tendons
• muscles
• nerves
• blood vessels
1.1.1.1 Bones and joints
The connections from the end of the forearm to the hand there are 15 bones. The
wrist itself contains 8 bones, called carpal bones, the ulna and the radius. The carpal
bones are separated into two rows, namely the proximal and distal that shown in Fig1.1.
Fig 1.1: Distal and proximal rows of carpal bones.
3
The wrist joint comprises into three different parts, the radiocarpal joint,
intercarpal joint and the distal radioulnar joint. Most of the movements of the wrist
occurs at the radiocarpal joint, which is a synovial articulation composed by distal end of
the radius and the scaphoid, lunate and triquetrum bones [2].
1.2 Wrist fracture
Wrist fractures are kind of fractures that happen any of carpal bones and two
forearm bones (radius and ulna). The most commonly wrist fractures are distal radius
and scaphoid fractures.
1.2.1 Distal radius fracture
Comminuted fractures of distal end of the radius are caused by high-energy
trauma and present as shear and impacted fractures of the articular surface of the distal
radius with displacement of the fragments. The position of the hand and the carpal bone
and also the impact of the forces cause the articular fragmentation and the displacement.
Distal radius fractures are very common. In fact, the radius is the most commonly
broken bone in the arm. The break usually happens when a fall causes someone to land
on their outstretched hands. It can also happen in a car accident, a bike accident, a skiing
accident, and similar situations [3].
4
1.3 Problem Statement
Distal radius fractures are among the most common injuries, with an estimate
overall crude incidence of 36.6/10,000 person-years in women and 8.9/10,000 person-
years in men. Assuming a continuous rise in the incidence of distal radial fractures with
age, and based on the fact that older population continues to grow, incidence of distal
radius fractures can be expected to increase. To allow for good functional outcome
following unstable distal radius fractures, restoration of both the radiocarpal and the
radioulnar relationship is essential, therefore surgical treatment should facilitate for
anatomic reduction and maintenance of the reduction. It means different surgical
methods can be used to fix the complicated, unstable and displaced distal radius
fractures.
The conventional volar plating for treated the dorsal displaced distal radius
fractures has been described with good results in young patients and with a mix of
fracture complexity. However, elderly patients with osteoporotic bone may have higher
risk of loss of reduction in conventional types of fixation because of screw loosening
and because of the toggle effect of the screws within the distal part of the plate.
Therefore the necessity of an optimum technique for restore not only the anatomical
alignment of the wrist but also its proper biomechanics such as preventing re-
displacement of the fragments and re-establishing the normal wrist load transmission
pattern has been provided new studies.
5
1.4 Objective of study
The objective summery of this study included:
1) Simulation of the distal part of the wrist and also simulation the intra-
articular distal radius fracture (AO 23-C2.1).
2) To develop 3D model of the fractured bone for all types of fixation
methods.
3) To simulate various surgical treatments for this type of intra-articular
fracture.
4) To compare between all different types of surgical treatments for fracture
fixation of the distal radius.
1.5 Scope of study
The scope the study, to simulate the 3D model of radius bone and also simulated
the unstable intra-articular fracture on bone. The next step to find the surgical methods
for this kind of distal radius fracture and simulated these surgical method as same as the
real plates of fixations. Then according to surgical open reduction and internal fixation
should find the optimum positioning for all types of fixations on fractured bone. To
provide the valid analysis should find the best positions for boundary condition and
exerting the loads. Should mention that the loads values should be choose base on the
daily motions that fractured wrist faces. Finally, should compare the results of all types
of fixation under the loads and find the most stabile and rigidness of fixation method.