Final Report- Mayura

download Final Report- Mayura

of 36

Transcript of Final Report- Mayura

  • 8/6/2019 Final Report- Mayura

    1/36

    EVALUATION AND DESIGNING OF NEW FEEDBACKFORMS

    FOR

    RASHTRIYA CHEMICALS & FERTILIZERS LTD.

    Submitted by

    MAYURA RAMTEKE

    1

  • 8/6/2019 Final Report- Mayura

    2/36

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

    I wish to express my deep sense of gratitude to our trainingguides Mrs. Nayana Mendhi (Training Manager) and Mrs.Rupali Wadhwani.

    I am also thankful to Prof. Mrs. Neeta Krishnan.

    2

  • 8/6/2019 Final Report- Mayura

    3/36

    INDEX

    Sr. no Title Pg no

    1 Executive Summary 1

    2 Company Profile 2

    3 Project design and methodology 9

    4 Theoretical framework of training and

    evaluation of training

    11

    5 Presentation and Interpretation of Data 22

    6 Conclusion & Suggestions 24

    7 Bibliography 29

    8 Annexure 30

    3

  • 8/6/2019 Final Report- Mayura

    4/36

    EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

    Training is a process of learning a sequence of programmed behavior. It is the

    application of knowledge. It gives people an awareness of the rules and

    procedures to guide their behavior. It attempts to improve the performance on

    the current job or prepare them for an intended job. Most organizations,

    whatever their size, invest time and money developing their staff. Whether it is

    training them on how to use a new piece of software, complete a form, give

    good customer service or write a professional letter, training is an essential

    part of every organizations management.

    Evaluation is the process of finding out how a course or any other training

    exercise has affected the organization. The three aspects that can be

    evaluated are - participants reaction to the program, what the trainees

    learned from the program and to what extent their on-the-job behavior

    changed as a result of the program.

    The objective of the study undertaken was to evaluate the current feedback

    form used for external training for the employees of Rashtriya Chemicals &

    Fertilizers Ltd. and to provide the company with a new feedback form. The

    feedback forms of sixty-three employees were evaluated for the period

    December 2005 - April 2006.Scores were allocated to this form and on the basis

    of these scores the effectiveness of the training programmes were analyzed.

    Due to certain disadvantages present in the current feedback form a new

    feedback form was prepared. The new form prepared contains less number of

    subjective questions, is quantified and can be easily evaluated.

    4

  • 8/6/2019 Final Report- Mayura

    5/36

    COMPANY PROFILE

    RCF MISSION STATEMENT:

    a) To produce fertilizers and chemicals efficiently, economically and in

    environment friendly manner.

    b) To serve the farmers and other customers with quality products along with

    support services.

    c) To join hands in the growth of national economy.

    RCF POLICY AND OBJECTIVES:

    Policy:

    Rashtriya Chemicals and Fertilizers Limited Commits to Produce and Market

    Fertilizers and Industrial Chemicals of Excellent Quality by using modern and

    Eco-Friendly Technology to meet the requirements of customers. RCF will alsoendeavor to fulfill its obligation to society at large by continuous improvement

    and growth.

    Objectives of the Company:

    a) To produce and market fertilizers and chemicals efficiently and

    economically in environmentally sound manner.

    b) To maintain optimum levels of efficiency and productivity in the use of

    resources and to secure optimal return on investment.

    c) To take up and implement the schemes for saving energy.

    d) To promote self-reliance in Companys operations including process know-

    how, design, engineering, erection, commissioning, operation and maintenance

    5

  • 8/6/2019 Final Report- Mayura

    6/36

    of plants and marketing of products with special emphasis on Research and

    Development.

    e) To aim at international standards of excellence in production and quality of

    products and services.

    f) To continuously upgrade the quality of human resources and promote

    organizational and management development.

    g) To enhance safety standards.

    h) To care for and protect the environment and minimize the harmful effects

    of emissions, atmospheric discharges and effluents by conforming and also

    improving up on the standards laid down by Pollution Control Authorities.

    i) To ensure corporate growth by expansion as well as diversification.

    j) To care for the community around especially SC/ST and other backward

    classes.

    BRIEF HISTORY:

    Rashtriya Chemicals & Fertilizers Ltd., a Government of India Undertaking,

    registered under the Companies Act 1956 was incorporated on March 6, 1978 on

    re-organisation of the erstwhile Fertilizers Corporation of India Limited and

    National Fertilizers Limited. The company is engaged in production and

    marketing of chemical fertilizers, bio fertilizers, and industrial chemicals with

    its manufacturing units at Trombay and Thal and marketing offices in most of

    the states. RCFs Trombay unit has 20 operating Plants while its Thal Unit is the

    largest plant in Asia with a capacity to produce 4500 TPD of Urea which

    incorporates the state of the art technology. During last two decades the

    company with sustained expansion, diversification and modernization

    programs, has come a long way and is now recognized as a leader in the

    fertilizer industry in the country. Rashtriya Chemicals & Fertilizers Ltd. has

    been graded as Excellent Company under the MOU rating by the Government

    6

  • 8/6/2019 Final Report- Mayura

    7/36

    of India for its overall performance in the last several years. Rashtriya

    Chemicals & Fertilizers Ltd. has been given Mini Ratna status by Government

    of India and is entitled for greater autonomy in taking several major decisions

    of corporate governance without the approval of the Government.

    RCF'S TROMBAY PRODUCT RANGES:

    Chemical

    Fertilizers

    Bio Fertilizers

    &

    Micronutrients

    Intermediates By

    Products

    Industrial

    Chemicals

    Ujjwala(Urea)

    Phosphoroussolubilizing

    Bacteria (PSB)

    Ammonia CarbonDioxide

    Methanol

    Suphala

    (15: 15: 15)

    Biola Nitric Acid Gypsum Methylamines

    (Mono, Di &

    Tri)

    Suphala

    (20: 20: 0)

    ANP

    Microla Sulphuric

    Acid

    Calcium

    Carbonate

    Conc. Nitric

    Acid

    Nimola (Coating

    Agent)

    Phosphoric

    Acid

    Dil.

    Sulphuric

    Acid

    Ammonium

    Bicarbonate

    Ammonium

    Nitrate

    N-15 Sodium Nitrate

    Sodium Nitrite

    Argon

    R.C.F.S MANPOWER DETAILS:

    7

  • 8/6/2019 Final Report- Mayura

    8/36

    The breakup as on 1.4.2006 is as follows:

    Sr.No.

    Posted at

    Posted at

    TotalTrombay

    A

    Thal

    B

    Area Offices(Excluding. A

    & B)1 Top Management (DGM &

    above)41 13 10 64

    2 Middle Management (ACE &CE)

    156 57 153 366

    3 Officers

    (AFM to Dy. CE)721 476 329 1427

    4 Workers 2129 1248 249 3626

    5Directly registered Mathadiworkers through statutory

    board

    915 734 0 1649

    6 Registered Mathadi Workers 296 0 0 296

    Grand Total 4258 2528 741 7428

    ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE:

    In public enterprises government plays an important role in determining theorganization structure of the unit. The organization structure is not static, but

    may change from time to time in response to the needs of the situation.

    In RCF, the chairman and the managing director (CMD) is the chief executive of

    the company. He is charged with the responsibility of implementing the policy

    decisions taken by the board of directors and formulating the procedures and

    rules for policy implementation. There are 5 executive directors on the

    companys board working under the overall supervision of chairman of the

    board who also is the managing director of the company. The general manager

    is the higher managerial authority and is a government appointee. For the day

    to day functioning of the company he keeps in touch with executive directors,

    he reports to and is answerable to the managing directors only.

    8

  • 8/6/2019 Final Report- Mayura

    9/36

    The heads of functioning departments are in turn assisted by managerial

    personnel each responsible for a separate department.

    MARKETING:

    RCF Ltd. provides a full range of marketing services including sales fertilizers

    promotions, agricultural research and free agronomical services. Fertilizer

    marketing is carried out through a well knit organization of dealers covering

    the states of Maharashtra, Gujarat, MP, Rajasthan, Andhra Pradesh, Tamil

    Nadu, Kerala, Karnataka, Delhi, UP, Punjab, Haryana, Bihar & West Bengal.

    RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT:

    The companys research and development department monitors the research

    work of institution so that it may be adapted for the companys operation. It

    promotes external research projects and undertakes direct research in selected

    areas inclusive of finding more and better uses for the industrial chemical it

    manufactures.

    CORPORATE MANAGEMENT DEVELPOMENT CENTRE:

    The centre was found for promoting the managerial excellence in organization.

    Some of the activities of centre includes- In house management consultancy,

    Organizing management development programmes, conducting small group

    activities at shop floor level, Systems Development and Evaluation, Training of

    Vocational students from academic institutes, and persons sponsored by other

    organizations, Organizing part time Diploma course for employees of the

    organisation as well as other organizations.

    9

  • 8/6/2019 Final Report- Mayura

    10/36

    HUMAN RESOURCES:

    RCF Ltd. believes that its people are its most important asset. The company

    also has a well designed system of giving personal attention, guidance and

    counseling services to new recruits thereby keeping their motivation levels

    high. In future it also has plans for reducing talent drain through a system of

    conducting Exit Interviews, creating an environment full of open culture,

    encouraging creativity and also enhancing mutual trust in order to maintain

    high employee motivation.

    Core Strengths of HRD Function:

    1) To develop and strengthen Technical & Managerial competencies of Human

    Resource on continuous basis to meet organizational objectives.

    2) To enhance employability of youth by imparting knowledge & skills specified

    under Apprenticeship Act

    3) To provide support for organizational development interventions such as

    Quality Circle, ISO-14001 and other productivity improvement schemes.

    4) To provide Research, Consultancy & Counseling Services v extending theexpertise of HRD services to other organizations.

    FINANCE:

    The major thrust area for the company is the optimum utilization of

    resources .The Company has a system of planning and budgeting every year, so

    as to ensure efficient working capital and funds management. The company has

    consistently increased its profits, year after year, thereby resulting in

    increased resources and surplus.

    Overall Outstanding Achievements and Recognition:

    10

  • 8/6/2019 Final Report- Mayura

    11/36

    RCF has made outstanding contribution to the life of farmer community by

    supplying different kinds of chemical fertilizers and bio fertilizers at cheap and

    affordable prices. RCF has also made conspicuous contribution towards

    protection of environment, greenery development, health, sanitation, safety

    and committed in discharging its social responsibilities through rural

    development, organizing blood donation camps, adoption of villages, adoptionof students particularly from backward classes and giving them free education,

    free medical check-up of employees and school children, relief at the time of

    disaster, imparting training to the ladies clubs from surrounding places for

    gardening etc.

    11

  • 8/6/2019 Final Report- Mayura

    12/36

    PROJECT DESIGN AND METHODOLOGY

    OBJECTIVE OF THE STUDY:

    The main objective of the study was to evaluate the current (external training)

    feedback form and to prepare a new feedback form.

    SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STUDY:

    Considering the importance and characteristics of the subject, this study has

    been undertaken to evaluate the current feedback form used for external

    training and to provide RCF with a new feedback form.

    PERIOD OF THE STUDY:

    The period of the study was from 3/5/06- 20/6/06

    METHODOLOGY FOR DATA COLLECTION:

    The data for the project was collected using secondary data i.e. feedbackreports of the training undergone by the employees. This study was

    confined to external training. The questionnaire/survey method was used to

    carry out the research. The data collected was analyzed and evaluated on

    the basis of accuracy of the data, content of the data and the objective for

    which data was collected.

    RESEARCH DESIGN:

    Research design is conclusive because:

    1. Information needed is clearly defined

    2. Research project is formal and structured

    3. Data analysis is quantified

    12

  • 8/6/2019 Final Report- Mayura

    13/36

    4. Findings will be used as inputs in decision making.

    Research design is causal because:

    1. Cause: To provide training.

    2. Effect: Training is effective or not effective.

    SAMPLING METHOD:

    Non- probability sampling method was used.

    SAMPLE & SAMPLE SIZE:

    The feedback forms of sixty-three employees were evaluated for the period

    December 2005 - April 2006.

    SCALE USED:

    Likert scale was used for scoring and Interval scale was used for analysis.

    13

  • 8/6/2019 Final Report- Mayura

    14/36

    THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK OF TRAINING ANDTRAINING EVALUATION

    MEANING OF TRAINING:

    Training is a process of learning a sequence of programmed behavior. It is the

    application of knowledge. It gives people an awareness of the rules and

    procedures to guide their behavior. It attempts to improve the performance on

    the current job or prepare them for an intended job. Training is a short term

    process utilizing a systematic and organized procedure for learning technical

    knowledge and skills for a definite purpose. The training is a systematic

    program of the organization that aims at increasing the attitudes, skills and

    abilities of the workers to perform specific jobs. By training the employee will

    acquire new manipulative skills, technical knowledge and problem solving

    ability.

    Objective of the training is to develop specific and useful knowledge, skills and

    techniques. It is intended to prepare people to carry out pre-determined tasks

    in well defined job context. Training is basically task oriented activity aimed at

    improving performance in current or future jobs. Training of any kind should

    have as its objective the redirection or improvement of behavior so that the

    performance of training becomes more useful and productive for himself and

    for the organization of which he is a part. Training normally concentrates on

    the improvement of either operative skills, interpersonal skills and decision

    making skills or a combination of these.

    NEED FOR TRAINING:

    14

  • 8/6/2019 Final Report- Mayura

    15/36

    To increase productivity

    Instruction can help employees increase their level of performance on their

    present assignment. Increased human performance often directly leads to

    increased operation productivity and increased company profits.

    Quality-

    Better informed workers are less likely to make operational mistakes. Quality

    increases maybe in relation to accompany a product or service or in reference

    to the intangible organizational employment atmosphere.

    To help a company fulfill its future personal needs-

    Organizations that have a good internal education program will have to make

    less drastic manpower changes and adjustments in the event of sudden

    personal alternations. When the need arises organizational vacancies are more

    easily staffed from internal sources if a company initiates and maintains an

    adequate instructional program for both its non-supervisory and managerial

    employees.

    Improve organization climate

    An endless chain of positive reactions results from a well planned training

    program. Production and product quality may improve. Financial incentives

    may then be increased.

    To improve health and safety-

    Proper training can help prevent industrial accidents. A safer work environment

    leads to more stable mental attitudes on the part of the employees.

    Prevent obsolescence-

    15

  • 8/6/2019 Final Report- Mayura

    16/36

    Training program fosters and initiates the creativity of the employees and helps

    to prevent manpower obsolescence which may be due to age, temperament or

    motivation or the inability of a person to adapt himself to technology.

    IMPORTANCE OF TRAINING:

    Training is the corner stone of sound management for it makes employees more

    effective and productive. The importance of training as a means of improving

    productivity is increasingly recognized. Changing technology and patterns of

    work mean that training must be a continuous process throughout a working

    life. Skills acquired for one job may also be transferred, modified and

    supplemented for other jobs. Training makes the employees more effective and

    productive.

    Training is a practical and vital necessity because it enables employees to

    develop and rise within the organization. It moulds the employees attitudes

    and helps them to achieve a better co-operation with the company and a

    greater loyalty to it. The management is benefited in the sense that high

    standards of quality are achieved, satisfactory organizational structure is built

    up, authority can be delegated and stimulus for progress applied to employees.

    Training, moreover heightens the morale of the employees for it helps in

    reducing the dissatisfaction, complaints, grievances and absenteeism, reduces

    the rate of turnover.

    Further trained employees make a better and economical use of materials and

    equipment therefore wastage and spoilage are lessened and the need for

    constant supervision is reduced.

    The values of training as pointed by Michael J. Jucius are:

    16

  • 8/6/2019 Final Report- Mayura

    17/36

    1. Training serves to improve employee skill that in turn increases the

    quantity and quality of output.

    2. The relative amount of equipment and material required to produce a

    unit of output is decreased.

    3. Executive effort will tend to shift from the disagreeable need ofcorrecting mistakes to the more pleasant tasks of planning more and

    encouraging expert employees.

    4. The various increases in productivity should find reflection in increased

    returns to both employer and employee.

    As training is important in the same way conducting the training systematically

    is also very important. Training needs should be assessed first then training

    objective should be prepared, then training program should be designed and

    implemented.

    TRAINING PROVIDED TO THE EMPLOYEES OF RCF:

    90% of the training is provided in-house and the remaining 10% is outsourced.

    INTERNAL TRAINING :( sample)

    Statutory Inputs for Managers:

    Understanding legal framework

    Ethics in business and administration/preventive vigilance

    Principle of natural justice/sexual harassment

    Disciplinary procedures standing order

    CDA rules, Enquiry

    Financial Management:

    Financial management an overview, important concepts

    Understanding financial statement/ ratio analysis

    Costing concepts and methods

    17

  • 8/6/2019 Final Report- Mayura

    18/36

    Working Capital Management and inventory control management

    Budgeting decisions and implications/ pricing

    SAP- ERP implementation

    Behavioral and Managerial:

    Personality Profile Analysis

    Building Emotional Intelligence and self awareness

    Communication and presentation skills

    Effective interpersonal relations/ working in groups

    Assertiveness/ handling difficult employees/ conflict management

    Team building and leadership development

    Counseling Skills development

    Goal setting and prioritization

    Time management/ Delegation

    EXTERNAL TRAINING :( sample)

    Departmental Enquiries

    HR Summit workshop on competencies for HR professionals

    FERT Marketing under emerging environment

    Agricultural Input Marketing

    Cash before you Crash

    58TH Annual Session of II Chemical Engineers

    Advances in chemical engineering

    Advanced Competency mapping

    Training on diesel & hydraulic cranes

    CME for Doctors

    Fire India 2006 Exhibition

    Impact of Environmental Pollutants and their control

    India LNG 2006

    Chemical Weapons Convention

    Fertilizer Marketing Management

    18

  • 8/6/2019 Final Report- Mayura

    19/36

    Effective negotiation

    Statutory requirement for industries

    EVALUATION OF TRAINING PROGRAM:

    Evaluation is the process of finding out how a course or any other training

    exercise has affected the organization. More and more companies and

    organizations are interested in finding out the impact of training on individuals

    within their organizations and on the bottom-line.

    The principles and techniques of evaluation if used correctly can help the

    training department to demonstrate the value of training in any organization in

    which it is established. Training is defined as the assessment of the total value

    of a training system, training course or a program in social as well as financial

    terms. Evaluation differs from validation in that it attempts to measure the

    overall cost benefit of the course or program and not just an achievement of its

    laid down objectives. According to Hamblin evaluation of training is to mean

    any attempt to obtain information on the effects of a training program, and to

    assess the value of the training in the light of that information which includes

    investigation before, during as well as after the training. It is impossible to

    assess the impact of training without knowing the situation before training for

    comparison with situation after training.

    However evaluation for the purpose of providing information for day to day

    decision making is a formative evaluation and the evaluation that determines

    the extent to which the mechanism is successful in meeting its goal is a

    summative evaluation.

    The choice of evaluation criteria depends on the objectives of the training

    .Therefore post-training is intimately connected with the pre-training

    investigation of training needs and establishment of training objectives.

    19

  • 8/6/2019 Final Report- Mayura

    20/36

    The evaluation data can be either quantified or unquantified .Quantified data

    is data which can be measured, systematic numerical. Unquantified data is

    data that is destructive, unsystematic and verbal. Because of its narrowness

    and specificity quantified data should never be taken at its face value butshould be interpreted in the light of unquantified data.

    Overall purposes of Evaluation :

    Evaluation helps to understand the following:

    Strengths and weaknesses of a current training programme

    The impact of training on individuals

    The impact of training on the organization

    Who should participate in further training programmes?

    Who benefited the most and least from the training exercise?

    The costs versus the benefits of training

    Specifically the areas individuals should continue to focus on for their

    own development.

    As per the requirements of ISO 9001:2000, it is necessary to document a

    post training feedback from HODs / sectional heads with regard to

    application/usefulness at the job.

    TRAINING EVALUATION MODELS:

    THE KIRKPATRICK MODEL:

    The Kirkpatrick Model looks at four levels of evaluation, from the basic

    reaction of the participants to the training to its organizational impact. The

    intermediary levels examine what people learned from the training and

    whether or not the learning affected their behavior on the job. Level one

    concerns itself with the most immediate reaction of participants and is easily

    20

  • 8/6/2019 Final Report- Mayura

    21/36

    measured by simple questionnaires after the training event. Level two is

    concerned with measuring what people understood and how they were able to

    demonstrate their learning. It might be measured by paper and pencil ability

    tests or job simulations. Level three looks at how peoples behavior on the job

    in terms of their job performance changed. Level 4 results are more difficult tomeasure. It focuses on the organizational rather than individual impact of the

    training.

    Depending on the type of training and the availability of resources the

    evaluation may focus on all levels or look at only a few levels.

    Level 1: Reaction: How did the participants react to the program?

    Level 2: Learning: What did individuals learn?

    Level 3: Behavior: What are the long term effects of the training on

    individuals job performance?

    Level 4: Result: How did the company or organization benefit from the

    exercise? What was the organizational impact?

    HAMBLINS MODEL- 5LEVELS:

    Level 1 Reaction: Carried out during, immediately after & sometime after the

    event .The learners reaction to a range of factors are sought.

    Level 2 Learning: Carried out before & after the event, an evaluation of the

    developmental change that had taken place in knowledge, skills & attitudes.

    Level 3 Job behavior: Determination of any change in job performance as a

    result of the event, carried out before and after the event

    Level 4 Functioning: A quantification of the effect of the event on the

    learners department or organization preferably in terms of cost benefit analysis

    21

  • 8/6/2019 Final Report- Mayura

    22/36

    Level 5 Ultimate value: The extent to which the event has affected the

    ultimate profitability and /or survival of the organization.

    CIRO FRAMEWORK:

    Ciro framework of evaluation asks three basic questions: What needs to be

    changed, what is likely to bring about the desired changes, what suggests that

    a change has actually taken place. This approach developed by Warr, Burn and

    Rackham is called the CIRO framework because the acronym refers to context,

    input, reaction and outcome evaluation.

    Context evaluation:

    It answers the question what needs to be changed. Here the trainer looks at

    ultimate objectives, intermediate objectives and immediate objectives.

    Input evaluation:

    It answers the question what is likely to bring about the desired changes. Here

    the trainer must evaluate his resources and decide on the best way to do so.

    Reaction evaluation:

    Here participants reaction to the training is obtained through questionnaires,

    or informally over coffee breaks or during conversations several weeks after

    the training.

    Outcome evaluation:

    There are 4 stages of outcome evaluation - defining training objectives,

    selecting measurements for these objectives, measuring the objectives at theappropriate time and assessing the results to improve the training .The purpose

    of this stage is for trainers to improve their product.

    22

  • 8/6/2019 Final Report- Mayura

    23/36

    Present Method of evaluating training in RCF:

    The company is very keen in developing its human resources. For this purpose

    the company has got a separate department known as CMDC. The centre wasset up in 1978, since then it is giving utmost importance for developing people

    through training.

    The training imparted in the company can be broadly classified into 5 types:-

    Sr. no Type of training General content1 Technical Technology related

    2 Functional Marketing, finance, production,

    projects, sales

    3 Behavioral Creativity, problem solving etc

    4 Computer Basics and advanced

    5 General Productivity improvement , safety

    CMDC has a well equipped computer training hall and two other spacious rooms

    known as hall of learning and conference rooms with conducive infrastructure.

    In the factory there is a multistoried building with a lot of training amenities

    like library, reading hall, well equipped training room and infrastructure

    related for training.

    Only good facilities are not sufficient for imparting training .The most

    important factor of imparting training effectively is trainer. The company has

    got a galaxy of competent trainers .Some outside trainers are invited for

    conducting training on particular topics.

    This shows that a lot of investment on training is made by the company. Just

    imparting training is not sufficient for development of individuals and thus the

    organization. Proper evaluation of training program should be done. The proper

    evaluation of training program helps to know the effectiveness of training.

    23

  • 8/6/2019 Final Report- Mayura

    24/36

    For training aids in future the training is evaluated at 2 stages in the company:

    1. Training feedback: (immediate)

    2. Post training feedback

    TRAINING FEEDBACK: The feedback is usually expected in 2 forms of data-

    Quantitative and qualitative.

    The quantitative data gives a base of concrete analysis. This data is usually

    gathered through questionnaires or rating scales at the end of the program.

    The qualitative data is obtained by having informal discussions with

    participants in the tea breaks, lunch breaks, etc. If the participants give any

    specific feedback or suggestions which are required for improvement of

    training program, it is considered and if feasible they ask the facilitator to

    implement it.

    The qualitative data is obtained through syndicate discussions after the training

    program .The discussion is generally held, wherein participants are encouraged

    to speak on the program. Various suggestions given here are noted. The HODs

    attend this discussion and facilitators of training where any problems related to

    training can be discussed.

    Post training feedback: Post training feedback will be done by interacting with

    HODs .The mater discussed will be about usefulness of training and how thistype of training benefits the company.

    24

  • 8/6/2019 Final Report- Mayura

    25/36

    PRESENTATION AND INTERPRETATION OFDATA

    Analysis of present feedback form: (Scoring)

    1. Programme usefulness rating:

    Relevance topresent job

    Very much2

    Quite1

    Not at all0

    Relevance tofutureassignments

    Very much2

    Quite1

    Not at all0

    Depth of themecoverage

    Extensive2

    OK1

    Not OK0

    Quality of inputs Practical Theoretical Proportion

    More

    2

    Less

    1

    More

    2

    Less

    1

    (IF ANY)

    Program duration Lengthy1

    Enough2

    Not Enough0

    2. I was personally benefited by this programme in terms of the following:

    A) Developing contacts 2

    B) Gaining new knowledge/ skills 2

    C) Reinforcing prior knowledge/ skills 2

    D) Problem areas discussed 2

    3. Based on my participation in the programme my plan of action forimplementation of knowledge/ skill gained is as follows:

    A) In working environment: (section/department/organization function): 1B) In working style: (behavioral/managerial): 1

    4. List of ideas which are very valuable to me but which may not be useful tomy department/organization:

    Ideas Probable difficulties for implementation:

    (Not scored)

    5. Based on my learning I would like to make presentation on the followingtopics:

    List of topics Preferred Period

    (Not scored)

    25

  • 8/6/2019 Final Report- Mayura

    26/36

    6. Comments:About organizers:About faculty members:About facilities:

    Very good/Excellent Good Ok Nothing Bad Very Bad

    3 2 1 0 -1 -2

    7. Originals of the course material, books received at the programme areenclosed for use at CMDC Resource centre: (Not scored)

    8. In future I would like to attend training programmes in the following areas:(Not scored)

    9. Brief note on the contents of the programme: (Not scored)

    The summation of all the above scores gave us a total overall rating out of 31.On the basis of the score the program was classified as follows:

    0 -10 Ineffective11-17 Satisfactory18-24 Effective25-31 Very Effective

    Percentage rating:

    Highly Effective- 41.26

    Effective 50.79

    Satisfactory 3.17

    Ineffective 1.58

    Form not filled- 3.17

    Ineffective

    Satisfactory

    Effective

    Highly

    Effective

    Form not

    filled

    26

  • 8/6/2019 Final Report- Mayura

    27/36

    CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION

    CONCLUSION:

    Disadvantages:

    1. Not user friendly since there were too many subjective questions.

    2. Many columns were left unfilled by employees undergoing external training.

    3. Due to many subjective questions form was difficult to analyze.

    4. Some of the questions were not relevant to the training programme.

    SUGGESTION: Preparation of new feedback form.

    27

  • 8/6/2019 Final Report- Mayura

    28/36

    (New) Training Feedback Report

    Program Details: (Pre-printed)

    Program Title :

    Date : Duration :

    Organized by : Venue :

    Employee Details:

    Name : Designation :

    Employee CC/ Ticket No: Plant/ Dept :

    Location :

    Please select the appropriate rating number from the scale below and insert in the

    box

    Not at all Small extent Moderate extent Large extent Very large extent0 1 2 3 4

    1) Training programme satisfied its declared objectives

    2) Training contents met my expectations

    3) This training is relevant to my field of work

    4) Training was appropriate for optimum learning in terms of

    Length Pace

    5) Faculty competence in terms of functional expertise and facilitation was satisfactory

    Faculty name: - 1

    23

    6) Facilities provided during the programme were satisfactory

    28

  • 8/6/2019 Final Report- Mayura

    29/36

    Not at all Small extent Moderate extent Large extent Very large extent

    0 1 2 3 4

    7) I received the following major benefits from this training

    - Helped confirm/clarify some of my ideas

    - Presented new ideas and approaches

    - Acquainted me with problems and solutions from other companies- Any other benefits (please specify)

    8) I would implement this training in my work place in the following manner (please explain)

    - by making changes in my managerial style

    - by suggesting/making changes in my work environment/systems

    - by making changes in my attitude- Any other changes (please specify)

    Please tick the appropriate box (es)

    9) I would like to share the knowledge gained from this training in the following manner

    Discussions Presentations Training sessions Article circulation

    Any other (please specify)

    10) Overall I found the training to be

    Below Average Average Good Very good Excellent

    11) Comments about the training

    Participants Signature:

    Date:

    29

  • 8/6/2019 Final Report- Mayura

    30/36

    ANALYSIS OF THE NEW FEEDBACK FORMScoring (65):

    1) Training programme satisfied its declared objectives

    Not at all Small extent Moderate extent Large extent Very large extent0 1 2 3 4

    2) Training contents met my expectations

    Not at all Small extent Moderate extent Large extent Very large extent0 1 2 3 4

    3) This training is relevant to my field of work

    Not at all Small extent Moderate extent Large extent Very large extent0 1 2 3 4

    4) Training was appropriate for optimum learning in terms of

    Length Pace

    Average of the two will be taken

    E.g.: Length Pace

    Score will be (3+ 2)/2 = 2.5

    5) Faculty competence in terms of functional expertise and facilitation wassatisfactory

    Faculty name: - 123

    Average will be taken

    6) Facilities provided during the programme were satisfactory

    Not at all Small extent Moderate extent Large extent Very large extent

    0 1 2 3 4

    30

    2 3

  • 8/6/2019 Final Report- Mayura

    31/36

    7) I received the following major benefits from this training

    - Helped confirm/clarify some of my ideas- Presented new ideas and approaches- Acquainted me with problems and solutions from other companies

    - Any other benefits (please specify)

    Not at all Small extent Moderate extent Large extent Very large extent0 1 2 3 4

    Total of the four will be taken.

    8) I would implement this training in my work place in the following manner (pleaseexplain)

    - By making changes in my managerial style- By suggesting/making changes in my work environment/systems- By making changes in my attitude- Any other changes (Please Specify)

    Not at all Small extent Moderate extent Large extent Very large extent0 1 2 3 4

    Total of the four will be taken.

    For question number 7 and 8 a pie-chart9) I would like to share the knowledge gained from this training in the followingmanner

    Discussions Presentations Training sessions Article circulation

    Any other (please specify)

    Score of one would be given for any number of boxes ticked.

    10) Overall I found the training to be

    Below Average Average Good Very good Excellent0 2 4 6 8

    A score of 65 will be achieved:

    Scoring:0 -16 INEFFECTIVE

    17-34 SATISFACTORY

    35-54 EFFECTIVE

    55-65 HIGHLY EFFECTIVE

    31

  • 8/6/2019 Final Report- Mayura

    32/36

    BIBLIOGRAPHY

    How to measure training effectiveness- Leslie Rae

    The HR Management Manual Paul Davis

    The skills of training Leslie Rae

    Evaluating Management Training and Development- BR Virmani, Premila Seth

    32

  • 8/6/2019 Final Report- Mayura

    33/36

    ANNEXURE

    33

  • 8/6/2019 Final Report- Mayura

    34/36

    (New) Training Feedback Report

    Program Details: (Pre-printed)

    Program Title :

    Date : Duration :

    Organized by : Venue :

    Employee Details:

    Name : Designation :

    Employee CC/ Ticket No: Plant/ Dept :

    Location :

    Please select the appropriate rating number from the scale below and insert in the

    box

    Not at all Small extent Moderate extent Large extent Very large extent

    0 1 2 3 4

    3) Training programme satisfied its declared objectives

    4) Training contents met my expectations

    3) This training is relevant to my field of work

    5) Training was appropriate for optimum learning in terms of

    Length Pace

    5) Faculty competence in terms of functional expertise and facilitation was satisfactory

    Faculty name: - 1

    2

    3

    6) Facilities provided during the programme were satisfactory

    34

  • 8/6/2019 Final Report- Mayura

    35/36

    Not at all Small extent Moderate extent Large extent Very large extent

    0 1 2 3 4

    7) I received the following major benefits from this training

    - Helped confirm/clarify some of my ideas

    - Presented new ideas and approaches

    - Acquainted me with problems and solutions from other companies- Any other benefits (please specify)

    8) I would implement this training in my work place in the following manner (please explain)

    - by making changes in my managerial style

    - by suggesting/making changes in my work environment/systems- by making changes in my attitude- Any other changes (please specify)

    Please tick the appropriate box (es)

    9) I would like to share the knowledge gained from this training in the following manner

    Discussions Presentations Training sessions Article circulation

    Any other (please specify)

    10) Overall I found the training to be

    Below Average Average Good Very good Excellent

    11) Comments about the training

    Participants Signature:

    Date:

    35

  • 8/6/2019 Final Report- Mayura

    36/36