Figure 1 Developing countries Developed countries.
8
Figure 1 Developing countries Developed countries 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% A rg en tina Brazil C hile C hina Ind ia South K orea Malaysia M exico Pakistan Ph ilipp ines T hailand South A frica C olom bia Venezuela Ind onesia US Jap an EU N orw ay Sw itzerland G reen box B lue box S & D (A rticle 6.2) D e m inim is AM S
-
Upload
jemima-anthony -
Category
Documents
-
view
219 -
download
3
Transcript of Figure 1 Developing countries Developed countries.
Figure 1
Developing countries Developed countries
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Arg
enti
na
Bra
zil
Chile
Chin
a
India
South
Kore
aM
alay
sia
Mex
ico
Pak
ista
n
Philip
pin
es
Thai
land
South
Afr
ica
Colo
mbia
Ven
ezuel
a
Indones
ia US
Japan EU
Norw
ay
Swit
zerl
and
Green box Blue box S&D (Article 6.2) De minimis AMS
Figure 2
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
Sw
itze
rla
nd
US
Ja
pa
n
No
rwa
y
EU
-15
Au
str
alia
Ne
w Z
ea
lan
d
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
Ko
rea
, Re
p.
Isra
el
Za
mb
iaT
ri. T
ob
ag
oV
en
ezu
ela
Ch
ina
Jo
rda
nS
ou
thT
ha
ilan
dM
ex
ico
Mo
roc
co
Bra
zil
Ch
ileP
eru
Ind
iaU
rug
ua
yC
os
ta R
ica
Ma
lay
sia
Ph
ilip
pin
es
Do
min
ica
nT
un
isia
Ke
ny
aP
ak
ista
nA
rge
nti
na
Co
lom
bia
Pa
rag
ua
yJ
am
aic
aN
ica
rag
ua
Ho
nd
ura
sIn
do
ne
sia
Developing countriesDeveloped countries
Ag
ricu
ltu
re G
DP
Green box as % of Agriculture GDP
High (over US$ 10 billion)
High (over 10%)
Low (below US$ 10 billion)
Low(under 10%)
India ($128; 2%)Brazil ($ 56; 4%)
Indonesia ($ 36; 0.5%)Pakistan ($ 20, 1.7%)
Mexico ($ 24; 8%)Australia ($ 20; 6%)Thailand ($ 16; 9%)
Argentina ($ 15; 1.7%) Philippines ($ 13; 2%)Colombia ($ 12; 1.5%)
Malaysia ($11; 2%)
China ($ 250; 14%)EU-15 ($ 205; 12%)
US ($ 125; 38%)Japan ($ 76; 30%)
South Korea ($ 22/ 22%)
South Africa ($ 6.4; 11%)Switzerland ($ 4.4; 49%)Venezuela ($ 4.4; 15%)
Norway ($ 3.6; 16%)Israel ($ 1.9; 17%)
Zambia ($ 1.2; 16%)Jordan ($ 0.3; 12%)
Trinidad and Tobago ($ 0.1; 16%)
Morocco ($ 7.8; 5%)New Zealand ($ 7.3; 3%)
Chile ($ 5; 4%)Peru ($ 4.7; 3%)
Kenya ($ 4.1; 2%)Tunisia ($ 3.3; 2%)
Dominican Republic ($ 2.0; 2%)Uruguay ($ 1.5; 3%)
Costa Rica ($ 1.5; 2%)Paraguay ($ 1.4; 1.5%)Honduras ($ 0.9; 1.1%)Nicaragua ($ 0.8; 1.2%)Jamaica ($ 0.5; 1.3%)
Figure 3
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
US
$ b
illio
n
Other green box programmes Decoupled income supportBlue box De minimis supportAMS
Figure 4
Figure 5
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
Bill
ion
EC
U
Green box (WTO) Green box (OECD) Blue box (WTO)
Blue box (OECD) Amber box (WTO) Amber box (OECD)
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
Other green box programmes Decoupled income supportBlue box De minimis supportAMS
Figure 6
Figure 7
WheatNet revenue = $1 from the market + $0.2 in the form of subsidy, per ha planted
Maize
Net revenue = $ 0.2 from the market + $1 in the form of subsidy, per ha to produce
Total market net revenue = $ 13
Total subsidy revenue = $ 17
Before decoupling After decoupling
Wheat Net revenue = $1 from the market
MaizeNet revenue = $ 0.2 from the market per ha to produce
Total market net revenue = $ 21
Total subsidy revenue = $ 17
10 ha
15 ha
20 ha
5 ha
If subsidy is updated = $ 9
$ 30 $ 38
Policy will not be
updated
Policy will be updated
Policy was not updatedPolicy was updated
What actually happenedWhat producer believes
SR and LR same production
SR market-oriented (oversubsidized)LR less subsidy but the producer could back to same production (expectations)
SR same productionLR market-oriented (oversubsidized)
SR and LR market-oriented (oversubsidized)
1 2
34
Figure 8
