FGD Scrubber an RevA

3
Lime / Limstone Slurry Storage Mist Eliminators Absorber 547 pH Sensor Quench Water Forced Air Blower Flue Gas Inlet Flue Gas Exit Flue Gas Reheater ESP Flue Gas From Boiler Stack CaCO 4  Slurry to Waste or Filtration  A p p li c ation No t e Wet Flue Gas Desulfurization Scrubbers Power: Environmental Coal red power plant emissions are a global concern. The burning of coal produces sulfur dioxide (SO 2 ). When released into the atmosphere SO 2  combines with water to form sulfuric acid (H 2 SO 4 ). Coal red power plants will use a ue gas desulfurization (FGD) scrubber to remove the SO 2  before release up the stack. The scrubbing process is pH dependent. In this paper we will explore some of the challenges in this type of pH measurement. The FGD scrubber uses chemical reagents sprayed into the ue gas to react with the SO 2 . Many different reagents have been used over the years. Examples include ammonia, caustic, lime, limestone, and sodium carbonate. Due to cost, the most common reagents are Lime (CaO) and Limestone (CaCO 3 ). Since both chemicals are very similar we will limit the scope of this paper to them. Both materials are solids thus they are mixed with water to form a slurry . The chemistry is as follows: Lime: CaO + 2H 2 O + SO 2   CaSO 3  + 2H 2 O Limestone:  CaCO 3 + 2H 2 O + SO 2   CaSO 3 + 2H 2 O + CO 2 Downstream from the boiler the flue gas passes through an electrostatic pr ecipitator (ESP). The ESP removes fly ash so it does not pass into the atmosphere. Quench water cools the flue gas at the entrance of the scrubber. Quenching reduces evaporation losses thus lowering chemical usage. Inside the scrubber spray nozzles mist the lime slurry down on the ue gas. This section is referred to as the absorber. The slurry and quench water O’BRIEN collects in the bottom of the absorber . A paste-like calcium sulte (CaSO3) sludge forms in the liquid. CaCO 3  can be very dif cult to remove if it settles out at the bottom of the absorber. More recent s crubber designs will blow outside air through liquid to convert the sul te to sulfate in the following reaction. CaSO 3  + H 2 O + 1/2O 2   CaSO 4  + H 2 O The addition of air is referred to as forced oxidation. The resulting calcium sulfate (CaCO 4 ) crystallizes in the liquid and is easily removed through ltration. An added benet from the process is that CaCO 4 (known as gypsum) can be sold as additive for wallboard and cement production.  As the ue gas continues through the scrubber it will pass through mist eliminators to further remove any entrained liquid. The nal ue gas may still contain some trace sulfur compounds. It will be r eheated to avoid cor rosion prior to entering the stack for release into the environment. Measurement challenges FGD scrubbers have multiple variables that can effect their ef ciency. These include: The pH of the slurry in the absorber is one of the main control parameters of t he scrubber . It is typically kept in a Figure 1 Flue Gas Desulfurization Process ue gas ow rate changing coal supplies coal sulfur content coal moisture • chloride content y ash content

Transcript of FGD Scrubber an RevA

Page 1: FGD Scrubber an RevA

8/13/2019 FGD Scrubber an RevA

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fgd-scrubber-an-reva 1/2

Lime / Limstone

Slurry Storage

Mist

Eliminators

Absorber

547 pH

Sensor

Quench

Water

Forced Air Blower

Flue Gas Inlet

Flue Gas Exit

Flue Gas

Reheater

ESPFlue Gas From Boiler

Stack 

CaCO4 Slurry to Waste or Filtration

 Application Note

Wet Flue Gas Desulfurization Scrubbers

Power: Environmenta

Coal fired power plant emissions are a global concern.

The burning of coal produces sulfur dioxide (SO2). When

released into the atmosphere SO2 combines with waterto form sulfuric acid (H2SO

4). Coal fired power plants will

use a flue gas desulfurization (FGD) scrubber to remove

the SO2 before release up the stack. The scrubbing

process is pH dependent. In this paper we will explore

some of the challenges in this type of pH measurement.

The FGD scrubber uses chemical reagents sprayed into

the flue gas to react with the SO2. Many different reagents

have been used over the years. Examples include

ammonia, caustic, lime, limestone, and sodium carbonate.

Due to cost, the most common reagents are Lime (CaO)

and Limestone (CaCO3). Since both chemicals are very

similar we will limit the scope of this paper to them. Bothmaterials are solids thus they are mixed with water to form

a slurry. The chemistry is as follows:

Lime: CaO + 2H2O + SO

2 ► CaSO

3 + 2H

2O

Limestone:  CaCO3+ 2H

2O + SO

2 ► CaSO

3+ 2H

2O + CO

2

Downstream from the boiler the flue gas passes through

an electrostatic precipitator (ESP). The ESP removes

fly ash so it does not pass into the atmosphere. Quench

water cools the flue gas at the entrance of the scrubber.

Quenching reduces evaporation losses thus lowering

chemical usage. Inside the scrubber spray nozzles mist

the lime slurry down on the flue gas. This section isreferred to as the absorber. The slurry and quench water 

O’BRIEN

collects in the bottom of the absorber. A paste-like calcium

sulfite (CaSO3) sludge forms in the liquid. CaCO3 can be

very dif ficult to remove if it settles out at the bottom of theabsorber. More recent scrubber designs will blow outside

air through liquid to convert the sulfite to sulfate in the

following reaction.

CaSO3 + H

2O + 1/2O

2 ►  CaSO

4 + H

2O

The addition of air is referred to as forced oxidation. The

resulting calcium sulfate (CaCO4) crystallizes in the liquid

and is easily removed through filtration. An added benefit

from the process is that CaCO4

(known as gypsum) can

be sold as additive for wallboard and cement production.

 As the flue gas continues through the scrubber it will passthrough mist eliminators to further remove any entrained

liquid. The final flue gas may still contain some trace sulfu

compounds. It will be reheated to avoid corrosion prior to

entering the stack for release into the environment.

Measurement challenges

FGD scrubbers have multiple variables that can effect their

ef ficiency. These include:

The pH of the slurry in the absorber is one of the maincontrol parameters of the scrubber. It is typically kept in a

Figure 1

Flue Gas Desulfurization Process

• flue gas flow rate

• changing coal supplies

• coal sulfur content

• coal moisture

• chloride content

• fly ash content

Page 2: FGD Scrubber an RevA

8/13/2019 FGD Scrubber an RevA

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fgd-scrubber-an-reva 2/2

PIPE NIPPLE

1-1/4” OR 1-1/2“

FULL PORT BALL VALVE

SENSOR

 TIP

547 PH SENSOR

Cert. No. 43271

ISO 9001:2008O’BRIEN

© 2013, by AMETEK, Inc. All rights reserved • FGD_Scrubber_AN_RevA • September, 2013

USA • BELGIUM • CHINA • SINGAPOREToll Free +1(800)993-9309 • Phone +1(775)883-2500 • Fax +1(775)297-4740

[email protected] • www.bat4ph.com

 Application Note

Wet Flue Gas Desulfurization Scrubbers

Barben Analyzer Technology reserves the right to make technical changes or modify the contents

of this document without prior notice. We reserve all rights in this document and in the subject

matter and illustrations contained within.

Kynar ® is a registered trademark of Elf Atochem North America Inc.

Hastelloy® is a registered trademark of Haynes Intl Inc.

H +

H +

H +

H +

H +

H +

H +   H +

Multiple Axial Ion PathsPlug free communication

Seal individual filtering chambers

 Annual Filtering JunctionMaintains measurement signal

Wood slows process ingress

Highly resistant to strong chemicals

Teflon Junction Interface

Initial protection against processLarge surface area

I O N P A T H

Figure 2

547 Retractable “Hot Tap” Sensors

Figure 3

Historically, scrubber pH measurements have been

made on sample lines. While this simplifies cleaning

and calibration of the sensor it may not provide the best

response time for adequate pH control. Over time the

slurry can plug up sample lines causing maintenanceissues. Barben Analyzer Technology recommends

mounting the pH sensor directly on the recirculation

piping using a retractable sensor such as the 547 or 567

“Hot Tap” sensor. Installation in the recirculation piping

improves speed of response while the slurry flow rate

helps keep build-up from forming on the electrode tip.

Material of construction should be either Hastelloy or

Kynar to best deal with the corrosive nature of the process

Barben sensors should be specified with “CR” Coat

Resistant high temperature glass electrodes.

Barben pH sensors will easily connect to most modern pH

analyzers in use today, Wiring diagrams for commonly

available instruments can be found on www.bat4pH.com o

via request from technical support.

range of 5.7 to 6.8pH. If the slurry drops below 5pH

then the scrubber will not ef ficiently remove SO2 from

the flue gas. If the pH gets above 7.5pH then CaCO3 /

CaCO4 scale can begin to plug nozzles, mist eliminators,

and other hardware. In addition to build-up problems,maintaining high pH increases reagent chemical usage

resulting in additional wear on pumps and valves plus

increased chemical cost.

The slurry in the bottom of the scrubber is typically 5-15%

solids. It is continuously recirculated to through the spray

nozzles to use up the residual lime compounds. Solids

concentration is controlled by bleeding off the bottom of

the absorber to either waste or gypsum production.

pH Measurement Solutions

pH measurement can be dif ficult in these applications.

Problems include:

 

• High sulfi des that attack the sensor 

• Heavy metals that attack the sensor 

• Abrasion and coating due to particulates

• Elevated temperatures shorten sensor life

Barben Performance Series pH sensors with Axial Ion

PathTM reference technology help to overcome the issues

listed above. The internal filtering junction prevents

chemical ingress into the sensor while the Axial Ion Path

seals ensure that the measurement signal is maintained.

Barben sensors are rate up to 130°C (266°F) so they caneasily handle the slurry temperatures.