Feasibility Study and Information collection for quotation Mimmi Version: 1.

14
Feasibility Study and Information collection for quotation Mimmi Version: 1

Transcript of Feasibility Study and Information collection for quotation Mimmi Version: 1.

Page 1: Feasibility Study and Information collection for quotation Mimmi Version: 1.

Feasibility Study and Information collection for quotationMimmiVersion: 1

Page 2: Feasibility Study and Information collection for quotation Mimmi Version: 1.

Mimmi_Feasibility_Study / Peter Karlsson 2

General Project name: Mimmi

Customer: SonyEricsson

PCC Site / Design center: Lund,

Project type:

Type of Product: Slide

Ramp-up:

Customer

LOM

Lifetime:

Customer plant focus:

LOM plant focus:

Volumes:

Total volume

Global peak volume

8.0 Mpc150kpc

Number of sales items / assemblies

Needed technologies

Page 3: Feasibility Study and Information collection for quotation Mimmi Version: 1.

Mimmi_Feasibility_Study / Peter Karlsson 3

–Front • Assembly technology:

–Inner frame• Assembly technology:

–Inner Support plate • Assembly technology:

–Battery Lid • Assembly technology:

–Touch Panel • Assembly technology: Adhesive

Mimmi

?

Page 4: Feasibility Study and Information collection for quotation Mimmi Version: 1.

Mimmi_Feasibility_Study / Peter Karlsson 4

Part Name: Front (Seamless+SEMC Loggo)

Part 3D Version: XXXX

Material: PC?

Weight / Vol. ?

Three possible surface finished.

Type 1:IMD (IMF/IMR)

Type 2:2K moulding. Black resin + Clear window resin + Hard Coating

Type 3:Painted plastic with top coating

General Part Information

Major Risks IdentifiedType 1

1. IMD. Problem with sharp corners and deep shapes.IML?

Type 2

1. Risk for uneven edge between window and black plastic.(Seamless)A recess between the different areas can hide the problem.

Type 3

1. Masking for window area requires a recess to hide over spray.88

52

Page 5: Feasibility Study and Information collection for quotation Mimmi Version: 1.

Mimmi_Feasibility_Study / Peter Karlsson 5

Part Name: Front (Regular frame without window)

Part 3D Version: XXXX

Material: PC/ABS?

Weight / Vol. ?

Two possible surface finished:

Type 1:Plastic frame, 1 layer base-coat, 1 layer Top coat.

Type 2:Black plastic with top-coat

General Part Information

Major Risks Identified

Type 1

1.

Type 2

1.

88

52

Page 6: Feasibility Study and Information collection for quotation Mimmi Version: 1.

Mimmi_Feasibility_Study / Peter Karlsson 6

Part Name: Inner Frame

Part 3D Version: XXXX

Material: PC/ABS?

Weight / Vol. ?

General Part Information

Major Risks Identified

1. Big open surface.

2. If the frame needs to stiffen the phone then we needs a stiffer material.Will give problem with planarity.

5288

Page 7: Feasibility Study and Information collection for quotation Mimmi Version: 1.

Mimmi_Feasibility_Study / Peter Karlsson 7

Part Name: Inner Support Plate

Part 3D Version: XXXX

Material: PC/ABS? SUS 304 3/4H?

Weight / Vol. ?

Three possible material configurations..

Type 1:Insert moulded. Stainless steel + plastic

Type 2:Stamped. Stainless steel

Type 3:Moulded. Plastic

General Part Information

Major Risks IdentifiedType 1

1. The metal part needs guiding holes for placement in the moulding tool.Flatness?

Type 2

1. Sharp edges?Flatness?

Type 3

1. Thin material?

88

52

Page 8: Feasibility Study and Information collection for quotation Mimmi Version: 1.

Mimmi_Feasibility_Study / Peter Karlsson 8

Part Name: Battery Lid

Part 3D Version: XXXX

Material: PC/ABS?

Weight / Vol. ?

Four possible surface finished:

Type 1:1 layer base-coat +1 layer Top coat.

Type 2:Coloured resin with top-coat

Type 3:Coloured resin

Type 4:3 layer paint system

General Part Information

Major Risks Identified

Type 1:

Type 2:• Surface defects visible

Type 3:• Sensitive for scratches

Type 4:

88

52

Page 9: Feasibility Study and Information collection for quotation Mimmi Version: 1.

Mimmi_Feasibility_Study / Peter Karlsson 9

Part Name: Touch panel

Part 3D Version: XXXX

Material: Flex film?

Weight / Vol. ?

General Part Information

Major Risks Identified

Page 10: Feasibility Study and Information collection for quotation Mimmi Version: 1.

Mimmi_Feasibility_Study / Peter Karlsson 10

–Belt Assy • Assembly technology:

–Belt • Assembly technology:

–Top Panel • Assembly technology: Heat-staked

–Bottom Panel • Assembly technology: Heat-staked

Mimmi

Belt

Bottom panel

Top panel

Page 11: Feasibility Study and Information collection for quotation Mimmi Version: 1.

Mimmi_Feasibility_Study / Peter Karlsson 11

Part Name: Belt

Part 3D Version: XXXX

Material: PC/ABS?

Weight / Vol. ?

Five possible surface finished:

Type 1:1 layer base-coat +1 layer Top coat.

Type 2:Coloured resin with top-coat

Type 3:Coloured resin

Type 4:VM (NCVM)

Type 5:3 layer painted system

General Part Information

Major Risks Identified

Type 1:

Type 2:• Surface defects visible

Type 3:• Sensitive for scratches

Type 4:• Needs top-coat• Non conductive?

Type 5:

Page 12: Feasibility Study and Information collection for quotation Mimmi Version: 1.

Mimmi_Feasibility_Study / Peter Karlsson 12

Part Name: Top Panel

Part 3D Version: XXXX

Material: PC/ABS?

Weight / Vol. ?

Three possible surface finished:

Type 1:1 layer base-coat +1 layer Top coat.

Type 2:Coloured resin with top-coat

Type 3:Coloured resin

General Part Information

Major Risks Identified

Type 1:

Type 2:• Surface defects visible

Type 3:• Sensitive for scratches

52

Page 13: Feasibility Study and Information collection for quotation Mimmi Version: 1.

Mimmi_Feasibility_Study / Peter Karlsson 13

Part Name: Bottom Panel

Part 3D Version: XXXX

Material: PC/ABS?

Weight / Vol. ?

Three possible surface finished:

Type 1:1 layer base-coat +1 layer Top coat.

Type 2:Coloured resin with top-coat

Type 3:Coloured resin

General Part Information

Major Risks Identified

Type 1:

Type 2:• Surface defects visible

Type 3:• Sensitive for scratches

52

Page 14: Feasibility Study and Information collection for quotation Mimmi Version: 1.