Fairfield Sentry Semi-Annual Review

FAIRFIELD SENTRY LIMITED – SEMI-ANNUAL UPDATE

1

Fairfield Greenwich (Bermuda) Ltd. 12 Church Street, Suite 606 Hamilton, Bermuda HM 11 Main (441) 292-5401 Fax (441) 292-5413 www.fggbm.com

Fairfield Sentry Limited Semi-Annual Update

February 20, 2008 Dear Investor: Fairfield Greenwich (Bermuda) Ltd. (“FGBL”), the Investment Manager of Fairfield Sentry Limited (“Sentry,” or the “Fund”), and a member company of Fairfield Greenwich Group (“FGG”), is pleased to provide you with the following semi-annual update on the progress of the Fund. Market Commentary The second half of 2007 was, by most measures, a period of significant financial market unrest. A deteriorating global economic environment defined by slowing GDP growth in the west, overheating capital markets in the east, a weak U.S. dollar, declining consumer and producer confidence, and the first signs of U.S. recessionary pressures characterized the last two quarters last year. Precipitated in part by a slowing U.S. residential housing market and magnified by the melt-down in credit markets, the balance sheet damage to many financial institutions was severe; many were forced to significantly write down the value of their non-performing mortgage and debt books. In this environment of cross-market instability, the U.S. Fed boldly stepped in on five occasions since September 2007 to inject monetary stimuli with a series of successive rate cuts – cutting the Fed Funds rate by 2.25% over a five month period. The parallels between the recent events and those of the early 1990’s are striking. Some readers may recall that the U.S. Fed aggressively cut rates by 4.25% during the 1990 – 1991 period to stave off recessionary pressures; these pressures arose from the concomitant slowdown in the Housing and Financial sectors. As with the current sub-prime crisis, lax credit standards and the extension of questionable loans in the late eighties and early nineties by several Savings & Loans associations led to a “mini-recession.” Although the recent cuts had the effect of providing U.S. equity markets with temporary relief, these various pressures culminated in January 2008 with global equity markets deflating between 10% to 20% and volatility peaking at 38% intra-day, its highest levels since 2003. Overall Fund Performance Despite the turbulent environment of the second half of 2007, Sentry has performed well, delivering a net return of 3.21% for the six-month period ending December 31, 2007 and another 0.63% in January 2008. This performance is all the more noteworthy in the context of the movement of large cap U.S. equities over this same period. The S&P 100 Index (the “Index”), a market cap weighted index of the top 100 equities in the U.S., returned 0.08% during the last half of the year. This market weakness intensified in January 2008 and at one point the S&P 100 DRI Index had fallen -10.52% intra-month before recovering somewhat following the surprise interest rate cut on January 22 to close the month down -6.06% (see Figure I).


2

Figure I. Sentry Net Returns vs. Selected Indices (Unaudited) Q1 2007 Q2 2007 Q3 2007 Q4 2007 2007 RISK*

Sentry 1.82% 2.14% 1.45% 1.74% 7.34% 1.64%

S&P 100 Index** -1.05% 7.16% 3.69% -3.48% 6.12% 10.07%

Lehman Agg. 1.50% -0.52% 2.85% 3.00% 6.96% 2.64% Source: FGG, Bloomberg. S&P 100 Index with dividends reinvested. * Risk is measured by trailing 12 month standard deviation. ** Calculated with net dividends reinvested. As many of our investors know, Sentry applies a synthetic index replicator and options trading strategy known as the split strike conversion (“SSC”) and alternates between periods of time invested in this combined stock/options position and time invested in a cash stance consisting of short-dated U.S. Treasury Bills. As such, the Fund typically spends more than half of the trading days in each year exposed to movements in the S&P 100 Index, albeit on a hedged basis. For the rest of the year, the Fund assumes a “risk-free” Treasury position and earns short-term money market rates of return as it seeks to protect capital during unfavorable market conditions for the SSC. The key to switching between these stances boils down to a question of timing – and timing, in its various forms, is the principal source of alpha in this strategy. Despite softening equity market conditions and a declining interest rate environment during the latter part of 2007, the Fund delivered a net return that exceeded both of its key market exposures. As can be seen in Figure II, over the past year Sentry has delivered a net return of 122 basis points above the S&P 100 Index with a fraction of the volatility. Similarly, the Fund has exceeded the 90-day Treasury Bill rate by 295 basis points. These results are quite intuitive when one considers the bull spread profile of the SSC. The combination of a synthetic index (composed of a basket of stocks designed to replicate the S&P 100 Index) and an options wrapper (consisting of short out-of-the-money S&P 100 Index calls and long out-of-the-money S&P 100 Index puts) means that Sentry is designed to provide large-cap U.S. equity exposure within a range, but with much less volatility. Since inception of the Fund in 1990, Sentry’s volatility, as measured by rolling 36 month standard deviation, has ranged between 1.34% to 3.23% and is currently 1.40%. Figure II. Source: FGG, Bloomberg. S&P 100 Index with dividends reinvested.

2007 Sentry Performance vs. S&P 100 Index

2007 Sentry Performance vs. US 90 Day T-Bill Index

0%

1%

2%

3%

4%

5%

6%

7%

8%

0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% 12%

Standard Deviation

Net R

etur

n

Fairfield Sentry LimitedS&P 100 Index DRI

0%

1%

2%

3%

4%

5%

6%

7%

8%

0% 1% 2%

Standard Deviation

Net R

etur

n

US 90 Day T-Bill Index

Fairfield Sentry Limited


3

Performance in Bull vs. Bear Markets Another important characteristic of the bull-spread profile created by the SSC is that it is designed to outperform the S&P 100 DRI Index on a net return basis during down equity markets (via the action of the protective put option) and underperform the S&P 100 DRI Index during strong up markets (via the action of the covered call option). Figure III presents the performance of Sentry during bull and bear markets for large cap U.S. equities and highlights this effect during the bull market of the late-1990’s and the bear market of the early part of this decade induced by the bursting of the technology bubble. Viewed over the longer term, the interaction of the stock basket and options collar to reduce volatility and dampen delta-adjusted equity market exposure can be seen on Figure IV. The net return of Sentry over the best and worst six month periods have been presented. More recently, many equity market indices have suffered deep declines, in some cases dropping more than 20% off of prior highs – a level that is often cited as the defining point of a technical bear market. Over the four month period from October 2007 to January 2008, the S&P 100 Index dropped -9.34% (at its depth, it had posted an intra-month peak to trough drawdown of -15.50% during this time). In keeping with its historic pattern of protecting capital during weak markets, Sentry delivered 2.38% of net return to its clients during the same four month period. Figure III. Source: FGG, Bloomberg. S&P 100 Index with dividends reinvested. As one might expect, consistently delivering positive performance across different market environments requires some adaptation. Bull markets of the sort seen in the late 1990’s (and even as recently as 2006) are ripe with entry and exit opportunities conducive to bull-spread investing. Conversely, bear markets characterized by negative momentum, skittish investor behavior, and poor liquidity pose additional timing and trading challenges. Over the 17 years it has been in existence, Sentry has recognized and adapted to a number of these regime shifts. For example, in the momentum and liquidity rich equity markets of 2006, Sentry accurately identified four major trend reversals during the year and implemented the SSC strategy around these periods of positive market directionality. Each of these four implementations lasted more than two months (longer than its long-run average holding of about four weeks). In contrast, weaker equity markets in 2007, characterized by relatively fewer periods of sustained positive market directionality (especially during the latter half of the year), meant that trading had to be more nimble and the SSC had to be constructed around shorter-term perceived trading opportunities. In fact, of the seven implementation cycles in 2007, all but one lasted fewer than four weeks.

Bear Market Performance Cumulative Return (Aug-00 to Sep-02)

Bull Market Performance Cumulative Return (Dec-94 to Apr-99)

67.29%

241.60%

0%

50%

100%

150%

200%

250%

300%

Cum

mul

ativ

e Re

turn

Fairfield Sentry Limited S&P 100 Index DRI

-49.37%

20.58%

-60%-50%-40%-30%-20%-10%

0%10%20%30%

Cum

mul

ativ

e Re

turn

Fairfield Sentry Limited S&P 100 Index DRI


4

Figure IV. Sentry’s Performance during best six month period of the S&P 100 DRI Index Sentry’s Performance during worst six month period of the S&P 100 DRI Index Source: FGG, Bloomberg. S&P 100 Index with dividends reinvested.

-28.92%

-22.15%

-15.10%-12.67%

-7.13%

6.68%4.30% 3.67% 3.91% 4.10%

-35%

-30%

-25%

-20%

-15%

-10%

-5%

0%

5%

10%

Mar 02 - Sep 02 Aug 00 - Feb 01 Apr 01 - Oct 01 Jun 00 - Dec 00 Jul 01 - Jan 02

S&P 100 Index DRI Fairfield Sentry Limited

32.10%

26.50%25.05% 23.99% 23.75%

6.11% 6.86% 6.38% 6.35% 6.10%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

Aug 98 - Feb 99 Jul 96 - Jan 97 Mar 97 - Sep 97 Jan 95 - Jul 95 Oct 97 - Apr 98

S&P 100 Index DRI Fairfield Sentry Limited


5

Excess Return Over T-Bills Many Sentry investors may be aware that the Fund has quite consistently delivered an annual net return that has exceeded the risk free rate by around 400 to 600 basis points. In previous letters, we have discussed this association and analyzed the consistency of the performance spread over one-month USD LIBOR across different market environments. Although this pattern continued to hold true in 2007, it has softened somewhat. Sentry’s net return spread to one-month LIBOR in 2007 was 200 basis points. During times when money markets are in equilibrium, using LIBOR as a proxy for Sentry’s Treasury Bill holdings makes sense. As it turns out, there was considerable dis-equilibrium in fixed income markets in 2007 and a significant de-coupling of Treasury Bill rates from Fed Funds and LIBOR. As a result, it may be instructive to examine Sentry’s excess return relative to the 90-day Treasury Bill Index as well. By mid-summer, many market participants began to realize that the impact of the housing-loan crisis and resulting economic slowdown would be more severe than originally thought. Equity market trading patterns turned less directional and exhibited fewer periods of sustained positive market momentum. Investors fled riskier assets to seek the shelter of government bonds (particularly shorter term treasury bills and notes) and by mid-August this flight to quality, combined with the expectation that the U.S. Fed would be forced to ease rates, had led to a sharp drop in yields. Figure V plots these three measures of short term interest rates over the past 10 years – the Fed Funds Target Rate, one-month LIBOR (the rate at which banks lend to each other) and 90-day Treasury Bill composite. Although these three rates have tracked each other closely for most of this decade, they began to significantly diverge in the third quarter of 2007 and by August 2007 the yield on the 90-day Treasury Bill composite was more than 2% lower than Fed Funds – an indication that the market was pricing in imminent rate cuts. Figure V. Fed Target Rate and LIBOR vs. Yield for 90 Day T-Bills – 1997 to 2007 Source: Bloomberg The SSC was implemented more selectively in this environment. Shorter cycle durations were accompanied by an increased number of partial implementations where less than the full corpus of assets were deployed. On an asset weighted basis, the SSC had been activated in 2007 slightly less than in previous years. Looked at another way, about 30% of Sentry’s net return in 2007 was derived from its Treasury Bill holdings (see Figure VI). The long

0.00.51.01.5

2.02.53.03.54.04.55.05.5

6.06.57.07.5

Aug-

97

Dec

-97

Apr-9

8

Aug-

98

Dec

-98

Apr-9

9

Aug-

99

Dec

-99

Apr-0

0

Aug-

00

Dec

-00

Apr-0

1

Aug-

01

Dec

-01

Apr-0

2

Aug-

02

Dec

-02

Apr-0

3

Aug-

03

Dec

-03

Apr-0

4

Aug-

04

Dec

-04

Apr-0

5

Aug-

05

Dec

-05

Apr-0

6

Aug-

06

Dec

-06

Apr-0

7

Aug-

07

Dec

-07

Fed Funds 90 Day T-Bills 1 Month LIBOR

`


6

run average annual attribution to Treasuries has been closer to 10%. In fact, Sentry’s exposure to short-dated U.S. Treasury Bills in 2007 was the highest it had been in the last five years – a reflection in part of Sentry’s capital preservation characteristics during a tumultuous period for global equities. Overall, Sentry delivered a net return in excess of Treasury Bills of 295 basis points, slightly less than its five year average spread of 454 basis points. Non-Split-Strike Conversion Initiative The Non-Split-Strike Conversion Initiative (“Non-SSC” or the “Initiative”) has been a feature of Sentry since October 1, 2002. The allocations to the Non-SSC managers consist of investing a small portion of Sentry’s capital to new investment vehicles managed by experienced management teams establishing themselves in new investment businesses. Non-SSC investments may also include strategic allocations to experienced managers in established funds. A key feature of this Initiative is that Sentry shareholders will not only participate in gains resulting from these investments, but FGBL also provides a form of “principal protection” from any losses that may result from these allocations at the end of a calendar year. Overall, the Non-SSC investments have performed well, collectively contributing about 0.99% to Sentry’s return since the inception of the Initiative in October 2002. The performance contribution of the Initiative to Sentry in 2007 has also been positive, adding 0.15% to Sentry’s net 7.34% return this year.. We have provided information on these investments in previous letters. Please contact your FGG representative for further information. As of December 31, 2007, the following investments were part of the Non-SSC Initiative: Fairfield Parabolic Partners Fund Ltd. (“Fairfield Parabolic”): The Fund’s investment in March 2006 of USD $7.5 million in Fairfield Parabolic was valued at the end of December 31, 2007 at approximately USD $7.8 million, which represents an allocation of 0.11% of Sentry’s assets. It has declined 5.32% in 2007. We expect to fully unwind this position. Fairfield Manhasset Offshore Fund Ltd. (“Fairfield Manhasset”): In July 2006, the Fund made an investment of USD $25 million in Fairfield Manhasset, sub-advised by Manhasset Capital Partners (“Manhasset”). In 2007, Fairfield Manhasset has returned 16.77%. At the end of December 31, 2007, the Fund’s holding was valued at approximately USD $30.7 million, which represents an allocation of 0.43% of Sentry’s assets. Fairfield Argenis Healthcare Fund Ltd. (“Fairfield Argenis”): In July and August 2006, Sentry made a combined USD $50 million allocation to Fairfield Argenis Healthcare Fund Ltd. (“Fairfield Argenis”) sub-advised by Argenis Capital Advisors, LLC (“Argenis”). Fairfield Argenis has declined 22.02% year-to-date. The Fund redeemed $25 million from Argenis in July 2007 and $16 million in September 2007. At the end of December 31, 2007, Sentry’s investment in Fairfield Argenis was valued at approximately USD $4.3 million, or 0.06% of assets. It is expected that this position will be fully unwound. Fairfield Wilshire Portable Alpha(“Fairfield Wilshire”): Fairfield Wilshire Portable Alpha seeks to deliver S&P 500 Index returns plus 3% net alpha (after all fees and costs) with a relatively high information ratio. The underlying alpha source is FGG’s Irongate Global Strategy Fund Limited (“Irongate”). Irongate is a fund of hedge funds that seeks to achieve capital preservation, long-term capital appreciation and superior risk-adjusted returns with low correlation to traditional equity and fixed income markets. In February 2007, the Fund made an investment of US$25.5 million in Fairfield Wilshire. Fairfield Wilshire has returned 13.90% in 2007. As of December 31, 2007, Sentry’s investment in Fairfield Wilshire was valued at approximately $29.1 million, which represents an allocation of 0.40% of Sentry’s assets. Fairfield Lion Japan Equity Fund Ltd (“Fairfield Lion”): In August 2007, the Fund made an investment of USD $5.2 million in Fairfield Lion. Fairfield Lion has declined 5.73% in 2007. At the end of December 31, 2007, the Fund’s holding was valued at approximately USD $4.9 million, which represents an allocation of 0.07% of Sentry’s assets. Fairfield Treeline Fund Ltd (“Fairfield Treeline”): In November 2007, the Fund made an investment of USD $25.1 million in Fairfield Treeline. Fairfield Treeline has returned 3.97% in 2007. At the end of December 31, 2007, the


7

Fund’s holding was valued at approximately USD $26 million, which represents an allocation of 0.36% of Sentry’s assets. Fairfield Icahn Fund Ltd (“Fairfield Icahn”): In December 2007, the Fund made an investment of USD $40 million in Fairfield Icahn. Fairfield Icahn declined 1.17% in its first month in the Initiative. At the end of December 31, 2007, the Fund’s holding was valued at approximately USD $39.5 million, which represents an allocation of 0.55% of Sentry’s assets. In addition to the above investments, Sentry has also made small allocations to a limited number of other strategic opportunities. Sentry has also invested 0.82% of its assets in four structured products which provide leveraged exposure to two of FGG’s multi-manager and fund of hedge fund products: Fairfield Investment Fund Ltd. (“FIF”); Fairfield Greenwich Fund (Luxembourg) – Guardian II Fund (“Guardian II”). FIF is FGG’s global multi-manager, multi-strategy fund that seeks to deliver superior risk-adjusted returns while maintaining a commitment to capital preservation. The underlying portfolios are broadly diversified with allocations to hedged equity, long/short equity, credit arbitrage, relative value, and event-driven managers. Similar to FIF, Guardian II is FGG’s Swiss-registered multi-manager, multi-strategy fund that seeks to deliver superior risk-adjusted returns while maintaining a commitment to capital preservation. These strategic investments have performed well, contributing 0.08% of the 0.15% year-to-date added to Sentry’s return by the Non-SSC Initiative. In total, allocations across all 11 non-SSC investments amounted to USD $201 million and constituted approximately 2.80% of Sentry’s portfolio as of December 31, 2007. The Fund expects to continue to opportunistically invest a small portion of its assets away from the SSC strategy. It is anticipated that the Fund will invest in a combination of seed/incubation opportunities (with experienced management teams seeking to establish new fund businesses) and strategic opportunities. Sentry’s allocation to any single investment is not expected to be greater than USD $100 million and the aggregate value of these investments is not expected to be greater than 5% of the Fund’s assets. Figure VI. Non-SSC Fund Returns (Unaudited) Q3 2007 Q4 2007 2007 RISK* Parabolic -3.69% -4.05% -5.32% 5.62 Manhasset 2.68% 4.53% 16.77% 7.28 Argenis -13.29% 0.00% -22.02% 16.11 Enhanced FIF 0.25% -1.58% 11.25% 13.58 Enhanced Guardian II 1.27% -4.10% 5.97% 10.35 Wilshire** 0.96% 0.69% 13.90% N/A Boiro** 0.39% -1.39% 10.56% N/A Lion *** -1.07% -4.70% -5.73% N/A Boiro 2 *** 2.63% -1.52% 1.07% N/A Treeline **** 3.97% 3.97% N/A Icahn ***** -1.17% -1.17% N/A

Source: FGG * Risk is measured by trailing 12 month standard deviation; investments with less than 12 months data not calculated. ** 2007 returns are from February 2007 onwards. *** Q3 and 2007 returns are from August 2007 onwards. **** Q4 and 2007 returns are from November 2007 onwards. ***** Q4 and 2007 returns are from December 2007 onwards.


8

Figure VII. 2007 Approximate P&L Attribution by Instrument Type of Split-Strike Conversion Assets (Unaudited) STOCK

P&L T-BILL

INTEREST NET

DIVIDENDS OPTIONS

P&L NET

PROFIT Q1 2007 -1.11% 0.56% 0.10% 2.28% 1.82% Q2 2007 3.38% 0.28% 0.23% -1.73% 2.14% Q3 2007 2.09% 0.68% 0.06% -1.26% 1.45% Q4 2007 -0.60% 0.64% 0.05% 1.72% 1.74% 2007 3.82% 2.18% 0.43% 0.91% 7.34%

Source: FGG Note: Calculations reflect gross of fees P&L divided by average assets each month, scaled down to net of fees performance. Figure VIII. Cumulative Growth of Sentry vs. S&P 100 DRI (From Inception to December 31, 2007) Source: FGG, Bloomberg. S&P 100 Index with dividends reinvested. We look forward to providing you with further updates regarding Sentry and the Initiative as we progress with our plans to continue to provide high value alternative asset management to the Fund’s shareholders. If you have any questions regarding the foregoing, Sentry, or any other FGG funds, please contact your FGG representative. Sincerely, Amit Vijayvergiya Partner Fairfield Greenwich (Bermuda) Ltd. Notes and Disclaimers This information has been prepared and is intended exclusively for existing investors in Fairfield Sentry Limited (the “Fund”). The performance results presented in this document are net of all fees and expenses and have been adjusted to reflect a 1% management fee and 20% performance fee. They do not,

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

Nov

-90

Aug-

May

-

Feb-

Nov

-93

Aug-

May

-

Feb-

Nov

-96

Aug-

May

-

Feb-

Nov

-99

Aug-

May

-

Feb-

Nov

-02

Aug-

May

-

Feb-

Nov

-05

Aug-

May

-

Sentry S&P 100 Lehman


9

however, represent an official accounting of Fund activities. Investors should reference their normal monthly or quarterly statement for the official record of the Fund’s valuation. The above summary/prices/quotes/statistics have been obtained from sources deemed to be reliable, but we do not guarantee their accuracy or completeness. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results. This document does not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy shares of the Fund. Such offer or solicitation may only be made by means of delivery of a Private Placement Memorandum that contains a description of the material terms, including risk factors, conflicts of interest, fees, expenses, and regulatory and tax considerations, relating to an investment in the Fund. An investment in the Fund is speculative and involves a high degree of risk. Investment results may vary substantially from year to year. An investor could lose all or substantially all of his or her investment. Certain statements in this document may include forward looking statements and forecasts concerning the Fund and the Fund’s plans, intentions, strategies, expectations, predictions and financial forecasts concerning the Fund’s future investment activities and results of operations and other future events or conditions based upon the views and opinions of the Fund’s investment manager. Such forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, which may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of the funds to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward looking statements. The Fairfield Greenwich Group assumes no obligation to update these forward-looking statements to reflect actual results, changes in assumption or changes in other factors affecting such forward-looking statements. The index information included in this document is meant simply to provide a frame of reference indicating the general trends in applicable markets during the specified time period. It is not intended to suggest that the Fund is comparable in any way with the index, either in composition, risk characteristics or investment objectives. The index information provided should not be interpreted as a benchmark for the Fund. It is not possible to directly invest in an index. “Fairfield Greenwich Group” is the marketing name for the securities and investment advisory businesses of Fairfield Greenwich Limited and its subsidiaries worldwide. In the United States securities are offered through Fairfield Heathcliff Capital LLC, a broker-dealer and member FINRA (formerly NASD) and SIPC. Investment advisory services are offered by Fairfield Greenwich Advisors LLC. In the EU, securities and investment advisory services are offered through Fairfield Greenwich (UK) Limited, 10 Cork Street, London W1S 3NP (Company Number 3440032), which is authorized and regulated by the Financial Services Authority (FSA), and which has approved this document for publication in the UK. In Singapore, securities and investment advisory services are offered through Lion Fairfield Capital Management Ltd., which holds a capital markets services license issued by the Monetary Authority of Singapore under the provisions of the Securities and Futures Act (Cap 289).

Fairfield Sentry Semi-Annual Review

Business

Transcript of Fairfield Sentry Semi-Annual Review