Faculty Meeting Dec 2013

download Faculty Meeting Dec 2013

of 80

Transcript of Faculty Meeting Dec 2013

  • 8/13/2019 Faculty Meeting Dec 2013

    1/80

    CHECKPOINT

    1. What is the meaning of SBM?

    2. What are the 4 guiding principles of Revised SBM?

    3. What is the meaning of D.O.D.?

    4. What is the meaning of PASBE?5. What is the role of PASBE to the implementation of SBM?

  • 8/13/2019 Faculty Meeting Dec 2013

    2/80

    The Revised SBM

    Assessment Tool

  • 8/13/2019 Faculty Meeting Dec 2013

    3/80

  • 8/13/2019 Faculty Meeting Dec 2013

    4/80

  • 8/13/2019 Faculty Meeting Dec 2013

    5/80

  • 8/13/2019 Faculty Meeting Dec 2013

    6/80

  • 8/13/2019 Faculty Meeting Dec 2013

    7/80

    Part I

    PERFORMANCE

    IMPROVEMENT

    60%

  • 8/13/2019 Faculty Meeting Dec 2013

    8/80

  • 8/13/2019 Faculty Meeting Dec 2013

    9/80

  • 8/13/2019 Faculty Meeting Dec 2013

    10/80

    DON JOSE YNARES

    SR. MNHS

    for the past 3 years

    Performing?

    Not performing?

  • 8/13/2019 Faculty Meeting Dec 2013

    11/80

    ACCESS (45%)

  • 8/13/2019 Faculty Meeting Dec 2013

    12/80

    EFFICIENCY (25%)

  • 8/13/2019 Faculty Meeting Dec 2013

    13/80

    EFFICIENCY (25%)

  • 8/13/2019 Faculty Meeting Dec 2013

    14/80

    EFFICIENCY (25%)

  • 8/13/2019 Faculty Meeting Dec 2013

    15/80

    QUALITY(30%)

  • 8/13/2019 Faculty Meeting Dec 2013

    16/80

    0 x 60= 0%

  • 8/13/2019 Faculty Meeting Dec 2013

    17/80

    Part II

    SBM AssessmentScore Based on

    D.O.D.

    40%

  • 8/13/2019 Faculty Meeting Dec 2013

    18/80

    Leadership and Governance

    Curriculum and Learning

    Accountability and Continuous

    Improvement

    Management of Resources

    Guiding Principles

  • 8/13/2019 Faculty Meeting Dec 2013

    19/80

    LEVEL III

    (ADVANCED ACCREDITED)

    LEVEL II

    (MATURING)

    LEVEL I

    (DEVELOPING)

    SBM PASBE OPERATIONAL FRAMEWORK

    AccreditationStatus

    Autonomous

    Re-

    accreditedStatus

    Candidate

    Status

    Accredited

    Initial

    Accreditation

    Leadership

    and

    Governance

    Curriculum

    and

    Learning

    Accountability

    Continuous

    Improvement

  • 8/13/2019 Faculty Meeting Dec 2013

    20/80

    Level I: Beginning

    Establishing and developingstructures and mechanisms with

    acceptable level and extent of

    community participation andimpact on learning outcomes.

    SBM Level of Practice

  • 8/13/2019 Faculty Meeting Dec 2013

    21/80

    Level II: Developing

    Introducing and sustaining

    continuous improvement processthat integrates wider community

    participation and improve

    significantly performance and

    learning outcomes.

  • 8/13/2019 Faculty Meeting Dec 2013

    22/80

    Level III: Advanced (Accredited)

    Ensuring the production of intendedoutcomes/ outcomes and meeting

    all standards of a system fully

    integrated in the local communityand is self-renewing and self-

    sustaining

  • 8/13/2019 Faculty Meeting Dec 2013

    23/80

    A. LEADERSHIP & GOVERNANCE

    Leader : Angela R. Agas

    Members :

    1. Ma. Victoria S. Cequena

    2. Annaliza Q. Mendoza

    3. Catherine O. Certeza4. Eric John G. Wenner

  • 8/13/2019 Faculty Meeting Dec 2013

    24/80

    B. CURRICULUM & LEARNING

    Leader : Adora Neri C. Antazo

    Members:1. Ginavia S. Antiporda

    2. Norelyn C. Anorma

    3. Edgar R. Durana4. Marie Joy M. Aralar

  • 8/13/2019 Faculty Meeting Dec 2013

    25/80

    C. ACCOUNTABILITY &

    CONTINUOUS DEVT

    Leader: Daisy C. Fedilo

    Members:

    1. Remedios C. Tirana

    2. Mary Rose Concepcion A. Flores

    3. Charito DG. Dela Cruz

    4. Mariane A. Distor

  • 8/13/2019 Faculty Meeting Dec 2013

    26/80

    D. RESOURCE MANAGEMENT

    Leader: Judy P. Aralar

    Members:

    1. Jaime P. Aralar, Jr.

    2. Jimmy S. Pajarillo

    3. Janneth C. Ojascastro4. Rose Marie P. Rivera

  • 8/13/2019 Faculty Meeting Dec 2013

    27/80

    What do the documents

    say?

    Beginning?

    Developing?

    Advanced?

  • 8/13/2019 Faculty Meeting Dec 2013

    28/80

  • 8/13/2019 Faculty Meeting Dec 2013

    29/80

  • 8/13/2019 Faculty Meeting Dec 2013

    30/80

    You

    are

    here.

  • 8/13/2019 Faculty Meeting Dec 2013

    31/80

  • 8/13/2019 Faculty Meeting Dec 2013

    32/80

  • 8/13/2019 Faculty Meeting Dec 2013

    33/80

    A network of leadership and governance guides

    the education system to achieve its shared vision,mission and goals making them responsive and

    relevant to the context of diverse environments.

    I. LEADERSHIP AND GOVERNANCE

    ORIENTATION-WORKSHOP ON THE USE OF SBM ASSESSMENT PROCESS

    AND TOOL (APAT) IN ASSESSING SCHOOL'S SBM LEVEL OF PRACTICE

    AND PASBE ACCREDITATION PROCESS

    I LEADERSHIP AND GOVERNANCE

  • 8/13/2019 Faculty Meeting Dec 2013

    34/80

    I. LEADERSHIP AND GOVERNANCEA network of leadership and governance guides the education system to achieve

    its shared vision, mission and goals making them responsive and relevant to the

    context of diverse environments.A. Indicators

    1. In place is a

    Development Plan

    (e.g. SIP) developed

    collaboratively by

    the stakeholders of

    the school and

    community.

    The development plan

    guided by the schools

    vision, mission and

    goal (VMG) is

    developed through the

    leadership of the

    school and theparticipation of some

    invited community

    stakeholders.

    The development plan

    is evolved through the

    shared leadership of

    the school and the

    community

    stakeholders.

    The development plan

    is enhanced with the

    community performing

    the leadership roles,

    and the school

    providing technical

    support.

  • 8/13/2019 Faculty Meeting Dec 2013

    35/80

  • 8/13/2019 Faculty Meeting Dec 2013

    36/80

    4. A leadership network

    facilitates

    communication

    between and among

    school and

    community leaders

    for informed

    decision-making and

    solving of school

    community wide

    learning problems.

    A network has been

    collaboratively

    established and is

    continuously improved

    by the school

    community.

    The network actively

    provides stakeholders

    information for making

    decisions and solving

    learning and

    administrative problems.

    The network allows easy

    exchange and access to

    information sources

    beyond the school

    community.

    5. A long term program

    is in operation that

    addresses the

    training and

    development needs

    of school and

    community leaders.

    Developing structures

    are in place and analysis

    of the competency and

    development needs of

    leaders is conducted;

    result is used to develop

    a long term training and

    development program.

    Leaders undertake

    training modes that are

    convenient to them (on-

    line, off-line, modular,

    group, or home-based)

    and which do not disrupt

    their regular functions.

    Leaders monitor and

    evaluate their own

    Leaders assume

    responsibility for their

    own training and

    development. School

    community leaders

    working individually or

    in groups, coach and

    mentor one another to

    achieve their VMG.

  • 8/13/2019 Faculty Meeting Dec 2013

    37/80

    The curriculum learning system anchored on the

    community and learners contexts and aspirationsare collaboratively developed and continuously

    improved.

    II. CURRICULUM AND INSTRUCTION

    ORIENTATION-WORKSHOP ON THE USE OF SBM ASSESSMENT PROCESS ANDTOOL (APAT) IN ASSESSING SCHOOL'S SBM LEVEL OF PRACTICE AND PASBE

    ACCREDITATION PROCESS

  • 8/13/2019 Faculty Meeting Dec 2013

    38/80

  • 8/13/2019 Faculty Meeting Dec 2013

    39/80

  • 8/13/2019 Faculty Meeting Dec 2013

    40/80

  • 8/13/2019 Faculty Meeting Dec 2013

    41/80

  • 8/13/2019 Faculty Meeting Dec 2013

    42/80

  • 8/13/2019 Faculty Meeting Dec 2013

    43/80

  • 8/13/2019 Faculty Meeting Dec 2013

    44/80

  • 8/13/2019 Faculty Meeting Dec 2013

    45/80

  • 8/13/2019 Faculty Meeting Dec 2013

    46/80

  • 8/13/2019 Faculty Meeting Dec 2013

    47/80

  • 8/13/2019 Faculty Meeting Dec 2013

    48/80

  • 8/13/2019 Faculty Meeting Dec 2013

    49/80

  • 8/13/2019 Faculty Meeting Dec 2013

    50/80

  • 8/13/2019 Faculty Meeting Dec 2013

    51/80

  • 8/13/2019 Faculty Meeting Dec 2013

    52/80

  • 8/13/2019 Faculty Meeting Dec 2013

    53/80

  • 8/13/2019 Faculty Meeting Dec 2013

    54/80

  • 8/13/2019 Faculty Meeting Dec 2013

    55/80

  • 8/13/2019 Faculty Meeting Dec 2013

    56/80

  • 8/13/2019 Faculty Meeting Dec 2013

    57/80

  • 8/13/2019 Faculty Meeting Dec 2013

    58/80

  • 8/13/2019 Faculty Meeting Dec 2013

    59/80

  • 8/13/2019 Faculty Meeting Dec 2013

    60/80

  • 8/13/2019 Faculty Meeting Dec 2013

    61/80

  • 8/13/2019 Faculty Meeting Dec 2013

    62/80

    B. CURRICULUM AND INSTRUCTION

  • 8/13/2019 Faculty Meeting Dec 2013

    63/80

    The curriculum learning systems anchored on the community and learners contexts and

    aspirations are collaboratively developed and continuously improved.1. The curriculum

    provides for the

    development needs

    of all types of

    learners in the school

    community

    All types of learners ofthe school community

    are identified, their

    learning curves

    assessed; appropriate

    programs with itssupport materials for

    each type of learner is

    developed.

    Programs are fullyimplemented and closely

    monitored to address

    performance

    discrepancies,

    benchmark bestpractices, coach low

    performers, mentor

    potential leaders, reward

    high achievement, and

    maintain environmentthat makes learning

    meaningful and

    enjoyable.

    The educational needsof all types of learners

    are being met as shown

    by continuous

    improvement on learning

    outcomes and productsof learning. Teachers as

    well as students

    performance is

    motivated by intrinsic

    rather than extrinsicrewards. The Schools

    differentiated program is

    frequently benchmarked

    by other schools.

  • 8/13/2019 Faculty Meeting Dec 2013

    64/80

    2. The implemented

    curriculum is

    localized to make it

    more meaningful to

    the learners and

    applicable to life in

    the community.

    Local beliefs, norms,

    values, traditions,

    folklores, current

    events, and existing

    technologies are

    documented and used

    to develop a lasting

    curriculum.Localization guidelines

    are agreed to by

    school community and

    teachers are properly

    oriented.

    The localized

    curriculum is

    implemented and

    monitored closely to

    ensure that it makes

    learning more

    meaningful and

    pleasurable, producesdesired learning

    outcomes, and directly

    improves community

    life. Ineffective

    approaches are

    replaced and

    innovative ones are

    developed.

    Best practices in

    localizing the

    curriculum are

    mainstreamed and

    benchmarked by other

    schools. There is

    marked increase in

    number of projectsthat uses the

    community as learning

    laboratory, and the

    school as an agent of

    change for

    improvement of the

    community.

  • 8/13/2019 Faculty Meeting Dec 2013

    65/80

    3. A representative

    group of school and

    community

    stakeholders

    develop the

    methods and

    materials for

    developing creativethinking and

    problem solving.

    A representative team

    of school and

    community

    stakeholders assess

    content and methods

    used in teaching

    creative, critical

    thinking and problemsolving. Assessment

    results are used as

    guide to develop

    materials.

    Learning materials and

    approaches to

    reinforce strengths and

    address deficiencies

    are developed and

    tested for applicability

    on school, family and

    community.

    Materials and

    approaches are being

    used in school, in the

    family and in

    community to develop

    critical, creative

    thinking and problem

    solving community oflearners and are

    producing desired

    results.

    4 The learning A school-based The school-based The monitoring system

  • 8/13/2019 Faculty Meeting Dec 2013

    66/80

    4. The learning

    systems are

    regularly and

    collaboratively

    monitored by the

    community using

    appropriate tools to

    ensure the holistic

    growth anddevelopment of the

    learners and the

    community.

    A school-based

    monitoring and

    learning system is

    conducted regularly

    and cooperatively; and

    feedback is shared

    with stakeholders.

    The system uses a tool

    that monitors the

    holistic development of

    learners.

    The school-based

    monitoring and

    learning systems

    generate feedback that

    is used for making

    decisions that enhance

    the total development

    of learners.

    A committee take care

    of the continuous

    improvement of the

    tool.

    g y

    is accepted and

    regularly used for

    collective decision

    making.

    The monitoring tool

    has been improved to

    provide both

    quantitative and

    qualitative data.

  • 8/13/2019 Faculty Meeting Dec 2013

    67/80

    5. Appropriate

    assessment tools

    for teaching and

    learning are

    continuously

    reviewed and

    improved, and

    assessment resultsare contextualized

    to the learner and

    local situation and

    the attainment of

    relevant life skills.

    The assessment tools

    are reviewed by the

    school and

    assessment results are

    shared with schools

    stakeholders

    The assessment tools

    are reviewed by the

    school community and

    results are shared with

    community

    stakeholders.

    School assessment

    results are used to

    develop learning

    programs that are

    suited to community,

    and customized to

    each learners context,

    results of which are

    used for collaborative

    decision-making.

    6. Learning managers Stakeholders are aware Stakeholders begin to Learning environments,

  • 8/13/2019 Faculty Meeting Dec 2013

    68/80

    g g

    and facilitators

    (teachers,

    administrators and

    community members)

    nurture values and

    environments that

    are protective of all

    children and

    demonstrate

    behaviors consistent

    to the organizations

    vision, mission and

    goals.

    of child/learner-centered,

    rights-based, and

    inclusive principles of

    education.

    Learning managers and

    facilitators conduct

    activities aimed to

    increase stakeholders

    awareness and

    commitment to

    fundamental rights of

    children and the basic

    principle of educating

    them.

    g

    practice child/learner-

    centered principles of

    education in the design

    of support to education.

    Learning managers and

    facilitators apply the

    principles in designing

    learning materials

    g ,

    methods and resources

    are community driven,

    inclusive and adherent to

    childs rights and

    protection requirements.

    Learning managers and

    facilitators observe

    learners rights from

    designing the curriculum

    to structuring the whole

    learning environment.

    7. Methods and Practices tools and Practices, tools, and There is continuous

  • 8/13/2019 Faculty Meeting Dec 2013

    69/80

    resources are learner

    and community-

    friendly, enjoyable,

    safe, inclusive,

    accessible and aimed

    at developing self-

    directed learners.

    Learners are

    equipped with

    essential knowledge,

    skills, and values to

    assume

    responsibility and

    accountability for

    their own learning.

    materials for developing

    self-directed learners are

    highly observable in

    school, but not in the

    home or in the

    community.

    Learning programs are

    designed and developed

    to produce learners who

    are responsible and

    accountable for their

    learning.

    , ,

    materials for developing

    self-directed learners are

    beginning to emerge in

    the homes and in the

    community.

    The program so

    collaboratively

    implemented and

    monitored by teachers

    and parents to ensure

    that it produces desired

    learners.

    exchange of information,

    sharing of expertise and

    materials among the

    schools, home and

    community for the

    development of self-

    directed learners

    The program is

    mainstreamed but

    continuously improved

    to make relevant to

    emergent demands.

  • 8/13/2019 Faculty Meeting Dec 2013

    70/80

    A clear, transparent, inclusive, and responsive

    accountability system is in place, collaboratively

    developed by the school community, which monitorsperformance and acts appropriately on gaps and gains.

    III. ACCOUNTABILITY AND CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT

    ORIENTATION-WORKSHOP ON THE USE OF SBM ASSESSMENT PROCESSAND TOOL (APAT) IN ASSESSING SCHOOL'S SBM LEVEL OF PRACTICE AND

    PASBE ACCREDITATION PROCESS

    C. ACCOUNTABILITY AND CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT

  • 8/13/2019 Faculty Meeting Dec 2013

    71/80

    A clear, transparent, inclusive, and responsive accountability system is in place,

    collaboratively developed by the school community, which monitors performance and acts

    appropriately on gaps and gains.1. Roles and

    responsibilities of

    accountableperson/s and

    collective body/ies

    are clearly defined

    and agreed upon

    by community

    stakeholders.

    There is an active

    party that initiates

    clarification of the

    roles andresponsibilities in

    education delivery.

    The stakeholders are

    engaged in clarifying

    and defining their

    specific roles andresponsibilities.

    Shared and

    participatory

    processes are used in

    determining roles,

    responsibilities, and

    accountabilities of

    stakeholders in

    managing and

    supporting education.

    2. Achievement of goals

    is recognized based on

    Performance

    accountability is practiced

    A community-level

    accountability system is

    A community-accepted

    performance

  • 8/13/2019 Faculty Meeting Dec 2013

    72/80

    is recognized based on

    a collaboratively

    developed performance

    accountability system;

    gaps are addressed

    through appropriate

    action.

    accountability is practiced

    at the school level.

    accountability system is

    evolving from school-led

    initiativesperformance

    accountability, recognition

    and incentive system is

    being practiced.

    3. The accountability

    system is owned by the

    community and is

    continuously enhanced

    to ensure that

    management structures

    and mechanisms are

    responsive to the

    merging learning needs

    and demands of the

    community.

    The school articulates the

    accountability assessment

    framework with basic

    components, including

    implementation guidelines

    to the stakeholders.

    Stakeholders are engaged

    in the development and

    operation of an appropriate

    accountability assessment

    system.

    School community

    stakeholders continuously

    and collaboratively review

    and enhance

    accountability systems

    processes mechanisms

    and tools.

  • 8/13/2019 Faculty Meeting Dec 2013

    73/80

  • 8/13/2019 Faculty Meeting Dec 2013

    74/80

    5. Participatory

    assessment of

    performance is

    done regularly with

    the community.

    Assessment results

    and lessons learned

    serve as basis forfeedback, technical

    assistance,

    recognition and

    plan adjustment.

    School initiates

    periodic performance

    assessments with the

    participation of

    stakeholders.

    Collaborative conduct

    of performance

    assessment informs

    planning, plan

    adjustments and

    requirements for

    technical assistance.

    School-community-

    developed

    performance

    assessment is

    practiced and is the

    basis for improving

    monitoring and

    evaluation systems,

    providing technical

    assistance, and

    recognizing and

    refining plans.

  • 8/13/2019 Faculty Meeting Dec 2013

    75/80

    IV. MANAGEMENT OF RESOURCEResources are collectively and judiciously mobilized

    and managed with transparency, effectiveness, andefficiency.

    ORIENTATION-WORKSHOP ON THE USE OF SBM ASSESSMENT PROCESS

    AND TOOL (APAT) IN ASSESSING SCHOOL'S SBM LEVEL OF PRACTICE

    AND PASBE ACCREDITATION PROCESS

    D. MANAGEMENT OF RESOURCE

  • 8/13/2019 Faculty Meeting Dec 2013

    76/80

    Resources are collectively and judiciously mobilized and managed with

    transparency, effectiveness, and efficiency.1. Regular resource

    inventory is

    collaboratively

    undertaken by

    learning managers,learning facilitators,

    and community

    stakeholders as

    basis for resource

    allocation and

    mobilization.

    Stakeholders are

    aware that a regular

    resource inventory is

    available and is used

    as the basis forresource allocation

    and mobilization

    Resource inventory is

    characterized by

    regularity, increased

    participation of

    stakeholders, andcommunicated to the

    community as the

    basis for resource

    allocation and

    mobilization

    Resource inventories

    are systematically

    developed and

    stakeholders are

    engaged in acollaborative process

    to make decisions on

    resource allocation

    and mobilization.

  • 8/13/2019 Faculty Meeting Dec 2013

    77/80

    2. A regular dialogue

    for planning and

    resource

    programming that is

    accessible and

    inclusive,

    continuously

    engagestakeholders and

    support

    implementation of

    community

    education plans.

    Stakeholders are

    invited to participate in

    the development of an

    educational plan in

    resource

    programming, and in

    the implementation of

    the educational plan.

    Stakeholders are

    regularly engaged in

    the planning and

    resource

    programming, and in

    the implementation of

    the education plan.

    Stakeholders

    collaborate to ensure

    timely and need based

    planning and resource

    programming and

    support continuous

    implementation of the

    education plan.

  • 8/13/2019 Faculty Meeting Dec 2013

    78/80

    3. In place is a

    community-

    developed resource

    management

    system that drives

    appropriate

    behaviors of the

    stakeholders toensure judicious,

    appropriate, and

    effective use of

    resources.

    Stakeholders support

    judicious, appropriate,

    and effective use of

    resources.

    Stakeholders are

    engaged and share

    expertise in the

    collaborative

    development of

    resource management

    system.

    Stakeholders sustain

    the implementation

    and improvement of a

    collaboratively

    developed, periodically

    adjusted, and

    constituent-focused

    resource managementsystem.

    4. Regular monitoring,

    evaluation, and

    Stakeholders are invited

    to participate in the

    Stakeholders

    collaboratively

    Stakeholders are

    engaged, held

  • 8/13/2019 Faculty Meeting Dec 2013

    79/80

    reporting processes

    of resource

    management are

    collaboratively

    developed and

    implemented by the

    learning managers,

    facilitators, and

    community

    stakeholders.

    development and

    implementation of

    monitoring, evaluation,

    and reporting processes

    on resource

    management.

    participate in the

    development and

    implementation of

    monitoring, evaluation,

    and reporting processes

    on resource

    management.

    accountable and

    implement a

    collaboratively

    developed system of

    monitoring, evaluation

    and reporting for

    resource management.

    5. There is a system that

    manages the network

    and linkages which

    strengthen and

    sustain partnerships

    for improving

    resource

    management.

    An engagement

    procedure to identify and

    utilize partnerships with

    stakeholders for

    improving resource

    management is evident

    Stakeholders support a

    system of partnerships

    for improving resourcemanagement.

    An established system of

    partnership is managed

    and sustained by thestakeholders for

    continuous improvement

    of resource

    management.

  • 8/13/2019 Faculty Meeting Dec 2013

    80/80