Faculty Meeting Dec 2013
-
Upload
duj-ralara -
Category
Documents
-
view
220 -
download
0
Transcript of Faculty Meeting Dec 2013
-
8/13/2019 Faculty Meeting Dec 2013
1/80
CHECKPOINT
1. What is the meaning of SBM?
2. What are the 4 guiding principles of Revised SBM?
3. What is the meaning of D.O.D.?
4. What is the meaning of PASBE?5. What is the role of PASBE to the implementation of SBM?
-
8/13/2019 Faculty Meeting Dec 2013
2/80
The Revised SBM
Assessment Tool
-
8/13/2019 Faculty Meeting Dec 2013
3/80
-
8/13/2019 Faculty Meeting Dec 2013
4/80
-
8/13/2019 Faculty Meeting Dec 2013
5/80
-
8/13/2019 Faculty Meeting Dec 2013
6/80
-
8/13/2019 Faculty Meeting Dec 2013
7/80
Part I
PERFORMANCE
IMPROVEMENT
60%
-
8/13/2019 Faculty Meeting Dec 2013
8/80
-
8/13/2019 Faculty Meeting Dec 2013
9/80
-
8/13/2019 Faculty Meeting Dec 2013
10/80
DON JOSE YNARES
SR. MNHS
for the past 3 years
Performing?
Not performing?
-
8/13/2019 Faculty Meeting Dec 2013
11/80
ACCESS (45%)
-
8/13/2019 Faculty Meeting Dec 2013
12/80
EFFICIENCY (25%)
-
8/13/2019 Faculty Meeting Dec 2013
13/80
EFFICIENCY (25%)
-
8/13/2019 Faculty Meeting Dec 2013
14/80
EFFICIENCY (25%)
-
8/13/2019 Faculty Meeting Dec 2013
15/80
QUALITY(30%)
-
8/13/2019 Faculty Meeting Dec 2013
16/80
0 x 60= 0%
-
8/13/2019 Faculty Meeting Dec 2013
17/80
Part II
SBM AssessmentScore Based on
D.O.D.
40%
-
8/13/2019 Faculty Meeting Dec 2013
18/80
Leadership and Governance
Curriculum and Learning
Accountability and Continuous
Improvement
Management of Resources
Guiding Principles
-
8/13/2019 Faculty Meeting Dec 2013
19/80
LEVEL III
(ADVANCED ACCREDITED)
LEVEL II
(MATURING)
LEVEL I
(DEVELOPING)
SBM PASBE OPERATIONAL FRAMEWORK
AccreditationStatus
Autonomous
Re-
accreditedStatus
Candidate
Status
Accredited
Initial
Accreditation
Leadership
and
Governance
Curriculum
and
Learning
Accountability
Continuous
Improvement
-
8/13/2019 Faculty Meeting Dec 2013
20/80
Level I: Beginning
Establishing and developingstructures and mechanisms with
acceptable level and extent of
community participation andimpact on learning outcomes.
SBM Level of Practice
-
8/13/2019 Faculty Meeting Dec 2013
21/80
Level II: Developing
Introducing and sustaining
continuous improvement processthat integrates wider community
participation and improve
significantly performance and
learning outcomes.
-
8/13/2019 Faculty Meeting Dec 2013
22/80
Level III: Advanced (Accredited)
Ensuring the production of intendedoutcomes/ outcomes and meeting
all standards of a system fully
integrated in the local communityand is self-renewing and self-
sustaining
-
8/13/2019 Faculty Meeting Dec 2013
23/80
A. LEADERSHIP & GOVERNANCE
Leader : Angela R. Agas
Members :
1. Ma. Victoria S. Cequena
2. Annaliza Q. Mendoza
3. Catherine O. Certeza4. Eric John G. Wenner
-
8/13/2019 Faculty Meeting Dec 2013
24/80
B. CURRICULUM & LEARNING
Leader : Adora Neri C. Antazo
Members:1. Ginavia S. Antiporda
2. Norelyn C. Anorma
3. Edgar R. Durana4. Marie Joy M. Aralar
-
8/13/2019 Faculty Meeting Dec 2013
25/80
C. ACCOUNTABILITY &
CONTINUOUS DEVT
Leader: Daisy C. Fedilo
Members:
1. Remedios C. Tirana
2. Mary Rose Concepcion A. Flores
3. Charito DG. Dela Cruz
4. Mariane A. Distor
-
8/13/2019 Faculty Meeting Dec 2013
26/80
D. RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
Leader: Judy P. Aralar
Members:
1. Jaime P. Aralar, Jr.
2. Jimmy S. Pajarillo
3. Janneth C. Ojascastro4. Rose Marie P. Rivera
-
8/13/2019 Faculty Meeting Dec 2013
27/80
What do the documents
say?
Beginning?
Developing?
Advanced?
-
8/13/2019 Faculty Meeting Dec 2013
28/80
-
8/13/2019 Faculty Meeting Dec 2013
29/80
-
8/13/2019 Faculty Meeting Dec 2013
30/80
You
are
here.
-
8/13/2019 Faculty Meeting Dec 2013
31/80
-
8/13/2019 Faculty Meeting Dec 2013
32/80
-
8/13/2019 Faculty Meeting Dec 2013
33/80
A network of leadership and governance guides
the education system to achieve its shared vision,mission and goals making them responsive and
relevant to the context of diverse environments.
I. LEADERSHIP AND GOVERNANCE
ORIENTATION-WORKSHOP ON THE USE OF SBM ASSESSMENT PROCESS
AND TOOL (APAT) IN ASSESSING SCHOOL'S SBM LEVEL OF PRACTICE
AND PASBE ACCREDITATION PROCESS
I LEADERSHIP AND GOVERNANCE
-
8/13/2019 Faculty Meeting Dec 2013
34/80
I. LEADERSHIP AND GOVERNANCEA network of leadership and governance guides the education system to achieve
its shared vision, mission and goals making them responsive and relevant to the
context of diverse environments.A. Indicators
1. In place is a
Development Plan
(e.g. SIP) developed
collaboratively by
the stakeholders of
the school and
community.
The development plan
guided by the schools
vision, mission and
goal (VMG) is
developed through the
leadership of the
school and theparticipation of some
invited community
stakeholders.
The development plan
is evolved through the
shared leadership of
the school and the
community
stakeholders.
The development plan
is enhanced with the
community performing
the leadership roles,
and the school
providing technical
support.
-
8/13/2019 Faculty Meeting Dec 2013
35/80
-
8/13/2019 Faculty Meeting Dec 2013
36/80
4. A leadership network
facilitates
communication
between and among
school and
community leaders
for informed
decision-making and
solving of school
community wide
learning problems.
A network has been
collaboratively
established and is
continuously improved
by the school
community.
The network actively
provides stakeholders
information for making
decisions and solving
learning and
administrative problems.
The network allows easy
exchange and access to
information sources
beyond the school
community.
5. A long term program
is in operation that
addresses the
training and
development needs
of school and
community leaders.
Developing structures
are in place and analysis
of the competency and
development needs of
leaders is conducted;
result is used to develop
a long term training and
development program.
Leaders undertake
training modes that are
convenient to them (on-
line, off-line, modular,
group, or home-based)
and which do not disrupt
their regular functions.
Leaders monitor and
evaluate their own
Leaders assume
responsibility for their
own training and
development. School
community leaders
working individually or
in groups, coach and
mentor one another to
achieve their VMG.
-
8/13/2019 Faculty Meeting Dec 2013
37/80
The curriculum learning system anchored on the
community and learners contexts and aspirationsare collaboratively developed and continuously
improved.
II. CURRICULUM AND INSTRUCTION
ORIENTATION-WORKSHOP ON THE USE OF SBM ASSESSMENT PROCESS ANDTOOL (APAT) IN ASSESSING SCHOOL'S SBM LEVEL OF PRACTICE AND PASBE
ACCREDITATION PROCESS
-
8/13/2019 Faculty Meeting Dec 2013
38/80
-
8/13/2019 Faculty Meeting Dec 2013
39/80
-
8/13/2019 Faculty Meeting Dec 2013
40/80
-
8/13/2019 Faculty Meeting Dec 2013
41/80
-
8/13/2019 Faculty Meeting Dec 2013
42/80
-
8/13/2019 Faculty Meeting Dec 2013
43/80
-
8/13/2019 Faculty Meeting Dec 2013
44/80
-
8/13/2019 Faculty Meeting Dec 2013
45/80
-
8/13/2019 Faculty Meeting Dec 2013
46/80
-
8/13/2019 Faculty Meeting Dec 2013
47/80
-
8/13/2019 Faculty Meeting Dec 2013
48/80
-
8/13/2019 Faculty Meeting Dec 2013
49/80
-
8/13/2019 Faculty Meeting Dec 2013
50/80
-
8/13/2019 Faculty Meeting Dec 2013
51/80
-
8/13/2019 Faculty Meeting Dec 2013
52/80
-
8/13/2019 Faculty Meeting Dec 2013
53/80
-
8/13/2019 Faculty Meeting Dec 2013
54/80
-
8/13/2019 Faculty Meeting Dec 2013
55/80
-
8/13/2019 Faculty Meeting Dec 2013
56/80
-
8/13/2019 Faculty Meeting Dec 2013
57/80
-
8/13/2019 Faculty Meeting Dec 2013
58/80
-
8/13/2019 Faculty Meeting Dec 2013
59/80
-
8/13/2019 Faculty Meeting Dec 2013
60/80
-
8/13/2019 Faculty Meeting Dec 2013
61/80
-
8/13/2019 Faculty Meeting Dec 2013
62/80
B. CURRICULUM AND INSTRUCTION
-
8/13/2019 Faculty Meeting Dec 2013
63/80
The curriculum learning systems anchored on the community and learners contexts and
aspirations are collaboratively developed and continuously improved.1. The curriculum
provides for the
development needs
of all types of
learners in the school
community
All types of learners ofthe school community
are identified, their
learning curves
assessed; appropriate
programs with itssupport materials for
each type of learner is
developed.
Programs are fullyimplemented and closely
monitored to address
performance
discrepancies,
benchmark bestpractices, coach low
performers, mentor
potential leaders, reward
high achievement, and
maintain environmentthat makes learning
meaningful and
enjoyable.
The educational needsof all types of learners
are being met as shown
by continuous
improvement on learning
outcomes and productsof learning. Teachers as
well as students
performance is
motivated by intrinsic
rather than extrinsicrewards. The Schools
differentiated program is
frequently benchmarked
by other schools.
-
8/13/2019 Faculty Meeting Dec 2013
64/80
2. The implemented
curriculum is
localized to make it
more meaningful to
the learners and
applicable to life in
the community.
Local beliefs, norms,
values, traditions,
folklores, current
events, and existing
technologies are
documented and used
to develop a lasting
curriculum.Localization guidelines
are agreed to by
school community and
teachers are properly
oriented.
The localized
curriculum is
implemented and
monitored closely to
ensure that it makes
learning more
meaningful and
pleasurable, producesdesired learning
outcomes, and directly
improves community
life. Ineffective
approaches are
replaced and
innovative ones are
developed.
Best practices in
localizing the
curriculum are
mainstreamed and
benchmarked by other
schools. There is
marked increase in
number of projectsthat uses the
community as learning
laboratory, and the
school as an agent of
change for
improvement of the
community.
-
8/13/2019 Faculty Meeting Dec 2013
65/80
3. A representative
group of school and
community
stakeholders
develop the
methods and
materials for
developing creativethinking and
problem solving.
A representative team
of school and
community
stakeholders assess
content and methods
used in teaching
creative, critical
thinking and problemsolving. Assessment
results are used as
guide to develop
materials.
Learning materials and
approaches to
reinforce strengths and
address deficiencies
are developed and
tested for applicability
on school, family and
community.
Materials and
approaches are being
used in school, in the
family and in
community to develop
critical, creative
thinking and problem
solving community oflearners and are
producing desired
results.
4 The learning A school-based The school-based The monitoring system
-
8/13/2019 Faculty Meeting Dec 2013
66/80
4. The learning
systems are
regularly and
collaboratively
monitored by the
community using
appropriate tools to
ensure the holistic
growth anddevelopment of the
learners and the
community.
A school-based
monitoring and
learning system is
conducted regularly
and cooperatively; and
feedback is shared
with stakeholders.
The system uses a tool
that monitors the
holistic development of
learners.
The school-based
monitoring and
learning systems
generate feedback that
is used for making
decisions that enhance
the total development
of learners.
A committee take care
of the continuous
improvement of the
tool.
g y
is accepted and
regularly used for
collective decision
making.
The monitoring tool
has been improved to
provide both
quantitative and
qualitative data.
-
8/13/2019 Faculty Meeting Dec 2013
67/80
5. Appropriate
assessment tools
for teaching and
learning are
continuously
reviewed and
improved, and
assessment resultsare contextualized
to the learner and
local situation and
the attainment of
relevant life skills.
The assessment tools
are reviewed by the
school and
assessment results are
shared with schools
stakeholders
The assessment tools
are reviewed by the
school community and
results are shared with
community
stakeholders.
School assessment
results are used to
develop learning
programs that are
suited to community,
and customized to
each learners context,
results of which are
used for collaborative
decision-making.
6. Learning managers Stakeholders are aware Stakeholders begin to Learning environments,
-
8/13/2019 Faculty Meeting Dec 2013
68/80
g g
and facilitators
(teachers,
administrators and
community members)
nurture values and
environments that
are protective of all
children and
demonstrate
behaviors consistent
to the organizations
vision, mission and
goals.
of child/learner-centered,
rights-based, and
inclusive principles of
education.
Learning managers and
facilitators conduct
activities aimed to
increase stakeholders
awareness and
commitment to
fundamental rights of
children and the basic
principle of educating
them.
g
practice child/learner-
centered principles of
education in the design
of support to education.
Learning managers and
facilitators apply the
principles in designing
learning materials
g ,
methods and resources
are community driven,
inclusive and adherent to
childs rights and
protection requirements.
Learning managers and
facilitators observe
learners rights from
designing the curriculum
to structuring the whole
learning environment.
7. Methods and Practices tools and Practices, tools, and There is continuous
-
8/13/2019 Faculty Meeting Dec 2013
69/80
resources are learner
and community-
friendly, enjoyable,
safe, inclusive,
accessible and aimed
at developing self-
directed learners.
Learners are
equipped with
essential knowledge,
skills, and values to
assume
responsibility and
accountability for
their own learning.
materials for developing
self-directed learners are
highly observable in
school, but not in the
home or in the
community.
Learning programs are
designed and developed
to produce learners who
are responsible and
accountable for their
learning.
, ,
materials for developing
self-directed learners are
beginning to emerge in
the homes and in the
community.
The program so
collaboratively
implemented and
monitored by teachers
and parents to ensure
that it produces desired
learners.
exchange of information,
sharing of expertise and
materials among the
schools, home and
community for the
development of self-
directed learners
The program is
mainstreamed but
continuously improved
to make relevant to
emergent demands.
-
8/13/2019 Faculty Meeting Dec 2013
70/80
A clear, transparent, inclusive, and responsive
accountability system is in place, collaboratively
developed by the school community, which monitorsperformance and acts appropriately on gaps and gains.
III. ACCOUNTABILITY AND CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT
ORIENTATION-WORKSHOP ON THE USE OF SBM ASSESSMENT PROCESSAND TOOL (APAT) IN ASSESSING SCHOOL'S SBM LEVEL OF PRACTICE AND
PASBE ACCREDITATION PROCESS
C. ACCOUNTABILITY AND CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT
-
8/13/2019 Faculty Meeting Dec 2013
71/80
A clear, transparent, inclusive, and responsive accountability system is in place,
collaboratively developed by the school community, which monitors performance and acts
appropriately on gaps and gains.1. Roles and
responsibilities of
accountableperson/s and
collective body/ies
are clearly defined
and agreed upon
by community
stakeholders.
There is an active
party that initiates
clarification of the
roles andresponsibilities in
education delivery.
The stakeholders are
engaged in clarifying
and defining their
specific roles andresponsibilities.
Shared and
participatory
processes are used in
determining roles,
responsibilities, and
accountabilities of
stakeholders in
managing and
supporting education.
2. Achievement of goals
is recognized based on
Performance
accountability is practiced
A community-level
accountability system is
A community-accepted
performance
-
8/13/2019 Faculty Meeting Dec 2013
72/80
is recognized based on
a collaboratively
developed performance
accountability system;
gaps are addressed
through appropriate
action.
accountability is practiced
at the school level.
accountability system is
evolving from school-led
initiativesperformance
accountability, recognition
and incentive system is
being practiced.
3. The accountability
system is owned by the
community and is
continuously enhanced
to ensure that
management structures
and mechanisms are
responsive to the
merging learning needs
and demands of the
community.
The school articulates the
accountability assessment
framework with basic
components, including
implementation guidelines
to the stakeholders.
Stakeholders are engaged
in the development and
operation of an appropriate
accountability assessment
system.
School community
stakeholders continuously
and collaboratively review
and enhance
accountability systems
processes mechanisms
and tools.
-
8/13/2019 Faculty Meeting Dec 2013
73/80
-
8/13/2019 Faculty Meeting Dec 2013
74/80
5. Participatory
assessment of
performance is
done regularly with
the community.
Assessment results
and lessons learned
serve as basis forfeedback, technical
assistance,
recognition and
plan adjustment.
School initiates
periodic performance
assessments with the
participation of
stakeholders.
Collaborative conduct
of performance
assessment informs
planning, plan
adjustments and
requirements for
technical assistance.
School-community-
developed
performance
assessment is
practiced and is the
basis for improving
monitoring and
evaluation systems,
providing technical
assistance, and
recognizing and
refining plans.
-
8/13/2019 Faculty Meeting Dec 2013
75/80
IV. MANAGEMENT OF RESOURCEResources are collectively and judiciously mobilized
and managed with transparency, effectiveness, andefficiency.
ORIENTATION-WORKSHOP ON THE USE OF SBM ASSESSMENT PROCESS
AND TOOL (APAT) IN ASSESSING SCHOOL'S SBM LEVEL OF PRACTICE
AND PASBE ACCREDITATION PROCESS
D. MANAGEMENT OF RESOURCE
-
8/13/2019 Faculty Meeting Dec 2013
76/80
Resources are collectively and judiciously mobilized and managed with
transparency, effectiveness, and efficiency.1. Regular resource
inventory is
collaboratively
undertaken by
learning managers,learning facilitators,
and community
stakeholders as
basis for resource
allocation and
mobilization.
Stakeholders are
aware that a regular
resource inventory is
available and is used
as the basis forresource allocation
and mobilization
Resource inventory is
characterized by
regularity, increased
participation of
stakeholders, andcommunicated to the
community as the
basis for resource
allocation and
mobilization
Resource inventories
are systematically
developed and
stakeholders are
engaged in acollaborative process
to make decisions on
resource allocation
and mobilization.
-
8/13/2019 Faculty Meeting Dec 2013
77/80
2. A regular dialogue
for planning and
resource
programming that is
accessible and
inclusive,
continuously
engagestakeholders and
support
implementation of
community
education plans.
Stakeholders are
invited to participate in
the development of an
educational plan in
resource
programming, and in
the implementation of
the educational plan.
Stakeholders are
regularly engaged in
the planning and
resource
programming, and in
the implementation of
the education plan.
Stakeholders
collaborate to ensure
timely and need based
planning and resource
programming and
support continuous
implementation of the
education plan.
-
8/13/2019 Faculty Meeting Dec 2013
78/80
3. In place is a
community-
developed resource
management
system that drives
appropriate
behaviors of the
stakeholders toensure judicious,
appropriate, and
effective use of
resources.
Stakeholders support
judicious, appropriate,
and effective use of
resources.
Stakeholders are
engaged and share
expertise in the
collaborative
development of
resource management
system.
Stakeholders sustain
the implementation
and improvement of a
collaboratively
developed, periodically
adjusted, and
constituent-focused
resource managementsystem.
4. Regular monitoring,
evaluation, and
Stakeholders are invited
to participate in the
Stakeholders
collaboratively
Stakeholders are
engaged, held
-
8/13/2019 Faculty Meeting Dec 2013
79/80
reporting processes
of resource
management are
collaboratively
developed and
implemented by the
learning managers,
facilitators, and
community
stakeholders.
development and
implementation of
monitoring, evaluation,
and reporting processes
on resource
management.
participate in the
development and
implementation of
monitoring, evaluation,
and reporting processes
on resource
management.
accountable and
implement a
collaboratively
developed system of
monitoring, evaluation
and reporting for
resource management.
5. There is a system that
manages the network
and linkages which
strengthen and
sustain partnerships
for improving
resource
management.
An engagement
procedure to identify and
utilize partnerships with
stakeholders for
improving resource
management is evident
Stakeholders support a
system of partnerships
for improving resourcemanagement.
An established system of
partnership is managed
and sustained by thestakeholders for
continuous improvement
of resource
management.
-
8/13/2019 Faculty Meeting Dec 2013
80/80