Facebook Group:

42
Facebook Group: The group is called: Psych281 Spring08 Available only to University of Alberta network Sorry to be rude but… Please don’t add me as a friend (avoiding any kind of favoritism, etc…)

description

Facebook Group:. The group is called: Psych281 Spring08 Available only to University of Alberta network Sorry to be rude but… Please don’t add me as a friend (avoiding any kind of favoritism, etc…). Chapter 3 Classical (Pavlovian) Conditioning. Ivan Petrovich Pavlov (1849-1936). - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Facebook Group:

Page 1: Facebook Group:

Facebook Group:The group is called:

Psych281 Spring08Available only to University of Alberta network

Sorry to be rude but…Please don’t add me as a friend (avoiding any

kind of favoritism, etc…)

Page 2: Facebook Group:
Page 3: Facebook Group:

Ivan Petrovich Pavlov (1849-1936)Pavlovian (Classical) conditioningPhysiologistDigestion

DogsConditional redirection of reflexes

Conditional reflexes

Page 4: Facebook Group:

Conditional??Yes, conditional

Mistranslated to conditioned

For learning at least, this is where the term “conditioning” came from

Page 5: Facebook Group:

TerminologyUnconditional stimulus (US)

Stimulus that elicits the innate reflex (e.g., food)Unconditional response (UR)

Reflex action that occurs in response to US (e.g., salivation)

Conditional stimulus (CS)Any stimulus that doesn’t originally elicit the UR

(e.g., buzzer)Conditional response (CR)

The action elicited by the CS (e.g., salivation)THIS IS LEARNED

Page 6: Facebook Group:

The BasicsUse behaviours that are already in place –

ReflexesAssociate some new (neutral) stimulus with

the stimulus that evokes the reflexHow? Present them together!

Buzzer-food (salivate)Buzzer-food (salivate)Buzzer-food (salivate)Buzzer-?

- CS-US UR- CS-US (CR) UR- CS-US (CR) UR- CS CR

Page 7: Facebook Group:

The BasicsTIME

Conditional Stimulus

on

off

Unconditional Stimulus

on

off

Unconditional Response

(after enough pairings)Conditional Response

Page 8: Facebook Group:

Measuring ConditioningSometimes difficult to measure CR

e.g., if CS & US close together, CR & UR can overlap

Buzzer-food-saliva, buzzer-saliva-food? How long is the separation between the buzzer and

the food?

IntensityDoes CR intensity increase with experience?

Test trial (probe trial)Give CS alone

Page 9: Facebook Group:

Probe (Test) TrialsTIME

Conditional Stimulus

on

off

Unconditional Stimulus

on

off

No Unconditional Response without the US!

Conditional Response?

Page 10: Facebook Group:

Some notes & examples…Awareness is NOT necessaryEyeblinkConditioned Suppression (Conditioned

Emotional Response)Suppression ratiosAnother way of MEASURING conditioning

Taste AversionTequila?

Page 11: Facebook Group:

S-S or S-R?

US

CS

Response

What kind of connection is being made?

Page 12: Facebook Group:

Rescorla (1973)So, how do you get rid of a response that is

hard wired to a stimulus?How can you get rid of a reflex?Habituation

Page 13: Facebook Group:

Results

Less suppression in Habituation group(In other words, more responding)

Therefore, the connection MUST be S – S

GroupGroup Phase 1Phase 1 Phase 2Phase 2 TestTest

HabituationHabituation L L N N (startle)(startle)

Noise Noise (habituate)(habituate)

LightLight

ControlControl L L N N (startle)(startle)

NothingNothing LightLight

Page 14: Facebook Group:

Higher Order ConditioningS-S-S?CSs and USs can be associated (First-order)CSs can be associated with other CSsSecond-order conditioning

salivation (CR)

first-order CS

tone (CS1) food (US)

second-order CS

Light (CS2)

Page 15: Facebook Group:
Page 16: Facebook Group:

Types of ConditioningDelay

ShortLong

TraceSimultaneousBackwardsInhibitory

Page 17: Facebook Group:

Delay ConditioningCS and US overlapShort

Usually the most effective

Longtiming

Page 18: Facebook Group:

Trace ConditionFrom “memory trace”Must remember CSOther stimuli interfere

CS

US

GAP

Page 19: Facebook Group:

Simultaneous conditioningWeaker than short delayCS can’t signal onset of US

Not predictive

CS

US

Page 20: Facebook Group:

Backwards conditioningMuch more difficultIgnores order

CS

US

Page 21: Facebook Group:

Conditioned InhibitionCS-

Up until now, we’ve been talking about CS+CS signals the ABSENSE or NON-

OCCURRENCE of USNeeds to be some expectation of the US for

this to work

CS+

US

CS-

Page 22: Facebook Group:
Page 23: Facebook Group:

Factors that affect conditioningContiguityContingencyStimulus FeaturesPrior ExperienceNumber of PairingsIntertrial Interval

Page 24: Facebook Group:

ContiguityCloseness together in time and/or spaceUsually, more learning if greater contiguity

between CS & USType of conditioning may influence thise.g., eyeblink vs. taste aversion

BUT, contiguity is not sufficient!

Page 25: Facebook Group:

Group CS-US pairings

US alone CR strength

A .40 0 Very strong

B .40 .10 strong

C .40 .20 Medium

D .40 .40 weak

Page 26: Facebook Group:

ContingencyIf-then situationConsistency of pairing CS and USGreater contingency, greater learninginformative

Page 27: Facebook Group:

Stimulus FeaturesIntensity of stimuli (CS & US)Compound Stimuli

Two+ simple CSs presented at the same timePaired with USOvershadowing – if one CS is more salient, the

other CS may be ignoredNature of Stimuli (relevance or

belongingness)Loud & noisy water?

Page 28: Facebook Group:

Prior experiencePrior experience with CS and/or US affects

conditioningcontingency

Latent inhibitionPrior experience with an neutral stimulus

makes it harder for it to become a CS laterNovelty

BlockingIntroducing a new CS (CS2) in compound with

an already trained CS (CS1)CS2 won’t be learned about

Page 29: Facebook Group:

Sensory preconditioningPair two CSsPair one with a USUnpaired CS still elicits CR

Phase 1 (CS1+CS2):-Light + Tone-Light + Tone-Light + Tone

Phase 2 (CS1+US):-Light + Food-Light + Food-Light + Food

Test (CS2?)-Tone?(measure response)

Page 30: Facebook Group:

Number of PairingsAcquisition curveNon-linearAsymptote

Conditioning Trials

CR

Str

en

gth

asymptote

Page 31: Facebook Group:

Intertrial IntervalITITime between each CS-US pairing (i.e.,

between trials)Generally, around 30 seconds effective

Page 32: Facebook Group:

Extinction, Spontaneous Recovery and Reacquisition

Page 33: Facebook Group:

ExtinctionContinued pairing of CS with US maintains

CRCS without US --> ExtinctionWeakening and stopping of CR

Not forgettingA type of conditioning

Withhold respondingCS paired with absence of US

Page 34: Facebook Group:

Spontaneous RecoveryAfter extinction, let time passPresent CS again (no US)Temporary, small return of CRShows extinction is not forgetting!!

Page 35: Facebook Group:

ReacquisitionExtinguish CRRecondition with CS-US pairingFewer trials required

Page 36: Facebook Group:

All Together Now!

Trials/Time

Str

en

gth

of

CR

Acquisition ExtinctionSpontaneous Recovery Reacquisition

CS&US CS alone CS alone CS&US

Page 37: Facebook Group:

How does this all work?

Page 38: Facebook Group:

Stimulus Substitution TheoryPavlovCR and UR produced by same neural region

Response centerCS takes on properties of USSubstitution

UScenter

CScenter

Responsecenter

Page 39: Facebook Group:

Sign Tracking

Food

Page 40: Facebook Group:

Sign Tracking

Page 41: Facebook Group:

But…CR should be the same as UR

e.g. signtracking, autoshapingBut it’s NOT!!Intensity, magnitudesOmissions & additions

Different CSs elicit different CRsCompensatory responses

Page 42: Facebook Group:

Preparatory Response TheoryLearn responses that prepare organism for

US occurrenceSometimes CR same as UR, sometimes

differentDrug Tolerance