Extra Vehicular Activity
description
Transcript of Extra Vehicular Activity
2-Dec-04 USC 2004 AME 557 Space Exploration Architecture
EVA Suit Requirements Camera for exterior shots and face shots Direct voice com independent of rover Support EVA time of up to 10 hours EVA suits will be provided by HERCULES staff
2-Dec-04 USC 2004 AME 557 Space Exploration Architecture
Technology Development Targets Skin tight suits Hard suits – “inflate” soft suit inside carbon fiber
shell Joint technology challenges Anti-dust coatings – electrostatic approach Vacuum/abrasion resistant coatings
EVA mobility EVA tools Garage and Resupply Aids
2-Dec-04 USC 2004 AME 557 Space Exploration Architecture
Custom Suits – The old way
Apollo 17 Suit – Harrison Schmitt – Photo Courtesy of NASA
Gemini 4 Suit - Ed White – Photo Courtesy of NASA
The Apollo suit, including the life support backpack, weighed about 180 pounds.
(Source NASA http://history.nasa.gov/spacesuits.pdf)
2-Dec-04 USC 2004 AME 557 Space Exploration Architecture
Modular Suit - Now
Shuttle EMU - Modular – Courtesy of NASA
(Source NASA http://history.nasa.gov/spacesuits.pdf)
Shuttle suit with the life support system, weighs about 310 pounds. The suit itself weighs about 110 pounds.
2-Dec-04 USC 2004 AME 557 Space Exploration Architecture
Suit Mass/Life Support Requirements The life support system design goal - 10 hours EVA
Water: 2.4 kg Oxygen: 0.35 kg Food: 0.25 kg Waste Products Removal/Handling:
CO2: 0.4 kg Urine: 0.66 kg Solid Waste: 0.09 kg
Mass is in fabric, pumps, electronics, etc.
2-Dec-04 USC 2004 AME 557 Space Exploration Architecture
Rover Suit Design Concepts/Sizing Mass < 100 pounds + modular life support for variable duration Straw man design:
One standard COTS pressure tank (0.727 kg of O2) + 1 smaller reserve tank, + third nitrogen tank
CO2 Removal: Lithium hydroxide or rechargeable metal oxide cartridges.
Food, Water, Waste Water ~ 90-100 ounces (ref. NASA STD-3000 Food dispenser – small built into helmet Waste collection: derived from the Shuttle Waste
Contamination System (WCS)(Reference: AIAA2003-
6276.SCOUT.pdf)
2-Dec-04 USC 2004 AME 557 Space Exploration Architecture
Hard Suit Prototype
Hard Suit Prototype – not enhanced
Mark III Suit – Evaluation Unit - Photo Courtesy of NASA
2-Dec-04 USC 2004 AME 557 Space Exploration Architecture
Skin Tight Suits – The Choice for Rovers Skin tight suits – Biosuit 1
Use mechanical counter pressure (MCP) for pressure production Active materials/piezo-electric
based pressure production Suit is donned like conventional
clothes – then shrinks to fit Smaller, more mobile Duration extension with recharge
packs on cart
Figure: http://mvl.mit.edu/EVA/biopics/DJN_MarsTwoView.jpg
Note 1: As described in “An Astronaut ‘Bio-Suit’ System for Exploration Missions, Newman, D. J.; Hoffman, J.; et al - Presentation to NIAC by MIT (ref. http://mvl.mit.edu/EVA/workshop.html)
2-Dec-04 USC 2004 AME 557 Space Exploration Architecture
Augmented Hard Suit – Construction and Serious EVA
Dust free EVA/hardsuits mounted on habitat walls (thus system must clean a minimal area before re-dock) – Scaled lander docking technology – Suit docks
Enhanced mobility through movement amplifiers
Spring based hopper and gyroscopic stability options
Training required for use! Race Support/Rescue Personnel,
but probably not for rover teams
2-Dec-04 USC 2004 AME 557 Space Exploration Architecture
Space Suit Feature Trades Trade of
Suit Types and suitability
Based on: ASTRONAUT PERFORMANCE: IMPLICATIONS FOR FUTURE SPACESUIT DESIGN: Frazer, A. L, et al, IAC-02-G.5.03
Type Advantages Disadvantages
Mechanical Counter Pressure
Ease of use, manueverable,
small
Less protection than other suits, waste collection
Modular Suits (Hard/Soft)
Current conventional
design, modular, low risk to design
Poor dust resistance, mass, size, pre-breathe
Hard Suit (not enhanced)
1 atm design, protection for
wearer
Reduced mobility. Increased size,
dust
Hard Suit (enhanced)
Enhance user capabilities, dust
free interior, 1 atm
Complexity, size, training
2-Dec-04 USC 2004 AME 557 Space Exploration Architecture
Suit Technology – Race will Accelerate and Prove Concepts
Electrostatic charging effects – use dust properties to repel rather than attract dust Cleaning station – baghouse with electrostatic
precipitator components built into suit – plug in? Electrostatic dust removal from rover surfaces –
hatch areas, viewports, solar cells Skin Suits that integrate self-cleaning fabrics Disposable covers for contingency use suits
2-Dec-04 USC 2004 AME 557 Space Exploration Architecture
Backpack to Dock
Suit docks 1
Adaptable to soft or hard suit designs
Note 1: “Suitport” - the NASA-Ames Hazmat vehicle, and the Hamilton-Sundstrand “Ready to Wear” Marssuit (Hodgeson & Guyer, 1998, 2000)
2-Dec-04 USC 2004 AME 557 Space Exploration Architecture
Helmet Incorporates Video Features + Stereoscopic cameras Work lights Interior camera for facial
shot - video appeal Multiband Radio/suit
controls – Radio links to Rover Earth-comm link (satellite) Other EVA
Food/Water dispenser
2-Dec-04 USC 2004 AME 557 Space Exploration Architecture
Rover Competion Drives Spiral Development of rover concepts will drive,
and in some cases, be driven by suit design
Race will serve to force suit evolution for focused needs and lead to diversified suit choices
Race will accelerate tool/EVA aid design
2-Dec-04 USC 2004 AME 557 Space Exploration Architecture
EVA Tools Design of suitable tools and EVA aids
facilitates competition goals Design for simplicity and utility and… Video appeal
2-Dec-04 USC 2004 AME 557 Space Exploration Architecture
Lunar Crossbow Simple, effective, photogenic Ideal for projecting rescue, tow,
comm or even power lines Max Range = v0
2/g, where gmoon = 1.62 m/s2
A projectile launcher capable of 105 meters/second initial velocity will have a max range of ~ 6.8 km. Off the shelf sporting crossbows can propel 26 gram projectiles at this velocity
Future study: Review designs for fishing crossbows, FOG/M missiles for lunar use
2-Dec-04 USC 2004 AME 557 Space Exploration Architecture
Regolith Hammer Simple hammer
device filled with regolith to aid in hammering stakes, etc., into the lunar surface
Bipod stabilization
2-Dec-04 USC 2004 AME 557 Space Exploration Architecture
EVA Scooter vs. Nonconventional Personal Locomotion
Trade – Amplified foot transport, conventional scooter, Segway type devise
Vendor/sponsor developed “common cycle” for all rovers
All will face dust challenges
Area needs more study!
Device Advantages Disadvantages
Scooter Fore/aft balance, ease of use
Size, front wheel dust
Amplified walker/hopper
Pogo or two footed spring devices
Training, safety
Segway™ Fast, easy to use, compact
Slopes, traction in 1/6 g and on regolith
2-Dec-04 USC 2004 AME 557 Space Exploration Architecture
Garage and Way Station Technologies En route solar storm protection desirable for
team safety Way Stations need crew resupply and rescue
aids Way stations demonstrate autonomous
helpers
2-Dec-04 USC 2004 AME 557 Space Exploration Architecture
Inflatable Way Station Garage
Self-erecting structure
Unmanned landing pod
Completed Garage
Unfolding two layerpetal-like structure with embedded inflatable beams
Regolith “pumps” while inflating
Idea adapted from: Chow, P. Y., and Lin, T. Y. ~1988:. ‘‘Structures for the Moon.’’ Engineering, construction, and operations in space, S. W. Johnson and J. P.Wetzel, eds., ASCE, New York, 362–374.
2-Dec-04 USC 2004 AME 557 Space Exploration Architecture
Way Station Resupply/Rescue
LSRU – Lunar Surface Replaceable Units
Way station has drive under resupply device Dock port on top or
side of rover Resupply cannister
plugs in
2-Dec-04 USC 2004 AME 557 Space Exploration Architecture
Resupply/Rescue/Transfer Concept
Way station automatically cleans rover dock area and attaches tunnel, crew crawls through and manually collects resupply
Could serve as crew transfer/rescue aid
2-Dec-04 USC 2004 AME 557 Space Exploration Architecture
Autonomous Helpers Way stations will be deployed with an autonomous or remote
controlled mini-rover. Remote control or autonomous
Drive to some local high point (perhaps within 5 km - approx line of site) of the waypoint to aid in location of the waypoint once a rover gets close.
Provides rover inspection and damage assement utility Camera link to way station for video transmission to earth Minimal supply cache transportation to nearby rover Power from solar/battery combination Size (small enough to go underneath most rovers for inspection)
2-Dec-04 USC 2004 AME 557 Space Exploration Architecture
Autonomous Helpers – Utility and Advertising
2-Dec-04 USC 2004 AME 557 Space Exploration Architecture
Conclusion EVA Capability,
events crucial to race appeal
Race provides stimulus for EVA development
2-Dec-04 USC 2004 AME 557 Space Exploration Architecture
Inflatable Structure
Graphic from: Engineering, Design and Construction of Lunar Bases H. Benaroya; L. Bernold; and K. M. Chua, ASCE 0893-13212002
2-Dec-04 USC 2004 AME 557 Space Exploration Architecture
EVA-Lunar Soil Properties References http://rtreport.ksc.nasa.gov/techreports/2001repo
rt/200/206.html Key milestones: Experiment with actual lunar dust. Determine the charge generated on dust particles by
photoemission due to ultraviolet absorption. Expose materials to charged and uncharged lunar
dust under simulated lunar environmental conditions. Contact: Dr. C.I. Calle (Carlos.Calle-
[email protected]), YA-F2-T, (321) 867-3274
2-Dec-04 USC 2004 AME 557 Space Exploration Architecture
EVA-Electrostatic Charging http://debye.colorado.edu/ZoltansJGR.pdf Contact charging of Lunar and Martian dust
simulants Quotes: “Our experiments demonstrated that both
regolith analog samples (JSC-1 and JSC-Mars-1) can become highly charged from a contact with either an insulating or conducting surface. The dust charge from contacts thus can be comparable or even exceed the charge a dust particle collects in a typical low temperature space plasma environment where the equilibrium charge is on the order of the electron temperature, Te, which is typically few eV [Horányi, 1996].”
2-Dec-04 USC 2004 AME 557 Space Exploration Architecture
EVA-Electrostatic Charging (cont’d) “The large contact charges described here
for planetary regolith analogs JSC-1 and JSC-Mars-1 suggest that grains lifted off airless planetary surfaces will carry a significant charge, regardless of ambient plasma conditions.”
2-Dec-04 USC 2004 AME 557 Space Exploration Architecture
EVA-Dust Properties – Research and Simulation
Minnesota Lunar Dust Simulant: “This simulant reproduces the chemical composition of lunar dust as well as its microscopic morphology. It does not reproduce well the mechanical properties of in situ lunar dust, due to the absence of Van der Waals (intermolecular level attraction) forces between grains at ambient pressure.”
Klinkrad H., U. Fuller, J.C. Zarnecki, "Retrieval of Space Debris Information from ESA's DISCOS Catalogue", Proc. ESA Workshop on Space Environment Analysis, Noordwijk, 9-12 October 1990 (ESA WPP-23)