Executive Coaching An HR View of What Works Dr Gavin R Dagley October 2006.

24
Executive Coaching An HR View of What Works Dr Gavin R Dagley October 2006

Transcript of Executive Coaching An HR View of What Works Dr Gavin R Dagley October 2006.

Executive Coaching

An HR View of What Works

Dr Gavin R DagleyOctober 2006

Research questions

how has executive coaching been used?

how effective was it?

what were the factors that predicted success?

Scale

17 interviews

1000+ executives

$15.4m spend

manufacturing / retail / corporate services / industrial / local government / government organisations / logistics / financial

“larger” ($1m+) and “smaller” ($200k-) programs

Does it work?

Overall, how effective has EC been in your organisation?

O’all $1m+ $200k-

5 - Outstandingly effective 1 1 -

4 - Very effective 6 2 4

3 - Moderately effective 10 3 7

2 - Marginally effective - - -

1 - Not effective - - -

What do executives think?

Overall, what have been the participants’ responses to the degree of benefit they received from EC? O’all $1m+ $200k-

5 - Outstandingly effective 3 2 1

4 - Very effective 11 4 7

3 - Moderately effective 2 - 2

2 - Marginally effective - - -

1 - Not effective - - -

What do executives gain?

Which of the following specific gains for the individuals have you become aware of that resulted from the EC work? (of 20)

strong some Total

Style, responses & issues 16 1 33

Communication & engagement 7 9 23

Robustness 6 7 19

Understanding own performance 7 4 18

Understanding org issues & solutions 3 11 17

What executives gain less?

Which of the following specific gains for the individuals have you become aware of that resulted from the EC work?

strong some

Total

Improved measured performance 2 711

Improved work throughput 2 4 8

Improved delegation ability - 8 8

What does the organisation gain?

Which of the following organisational gains occurred as result of using EC? (all)

strong some Total

Building talent pool capability 8 8 24

Talent retention & morale 6 6 18

Effective leadership 4 7 15

Cultural change 3 6 12

Team cohesion 3 6 12

Conflict resolution 1 9 11

Performance remediation 3 5 11

What are the drawbacks?

What drawbacks and difficulties have you experienced with EC services?

big some Total

Expensive 4 6 14

Making session time 1 12 14

Poor translation to behaviours 3 6 12

Negative perceptions of EC 3 6 12

Locating good coaches 3 5 11

Difficulty linking to org performance 1 9 11

Programs & Costs

9 sessions (4 to 18) 90-minute sessions (50 to 120) 7 months duration (3 to 12) range - $600 for 4 >> $45,000 for 18 $12,600 per executive ($10k median) $717 per hour ($488 median)

Cost/benefit estimates

If you were to make an estimate, overall, how do you rate EC in terms of the extent to which the dollar returns exceeded (or were exceeded by) the cost?

O’all $1m+ $200k-

Greatly exceeded 2 11

Exceeded 4 3 1

Equal 2 11

Less than 1 - 1

A lot less than - --

Are you interested?

How much interest do you have in using EC services in the next two years?

Strong 15

Some 2

Little -

None -

What makes it effective?

What makes it effective?For each of the following program factors please indicate the

relative importance of each using a 4 to 1 scale, with [4] meaning CRITICALLY IMPORTANT and [1] meaning NOT IMPORTANT: (22 factors)

Highly skilled coaches 4.0

Rapport and trust between the coach and participant 3.9

Confidentiality of discussions to coach and participant only 3.9

Senior management support and engagement 3.8

Participant engagement and commitment 3.8

Other ethical considerations effectively dealt with 3.8

What makes it effective?For each of the following program factors please indicate the

relative importance of each using a 4 to 1 scale, with [4] meaning CRITICALLY IMPORTANT and [1] meaning NOT IMPORTANT: (22 factors)

….continued

Careful matching of coach and participant 3.8

Sponsor/supervisor support and engagement 3.7

Allowing coaches considerable flexibility to individually

tailor program content 3.6

Rigorous coach selection procedures 3.5

Careful participant selection 3.5

What factors have less effect?For each of the following program factors please

indicate the relative importance of each using a 4 to 1 scale, with [4] meaning CRITICALLY IMPORTANT and [1] meaning NOT IMPORTANT: (22 factors)

Participant choice in the selection of the coach 2.8

Formal measurement and reporting processes 2.8

Having a standard structure for coaching programs 2.4

Use of psychometric tools and inventories in the content of

each program 2.2

Collation and presentation of EC results 2.2

Having a standard model for the delivery of content 1.9

What makes EC effective?4.0

3.3

2.0

Interesting stuff

Defining coaching

Goal-setting

Concern about reporting

Fascinating contrasts

Efficacy vs interest

Individual vs organisational gains

Larger vs smaller programs

Value of structure vs measurement & support

The bind

EC >> $$

Complexity & uncertainty

Pressure for structure

Individual vs organisational benefits

Strong interestLimited options

Expensive

Hypothesis

Extraordinary executive coaching functions in a niche

in which results are difficult to measure

that sometimes produces extraordinary changes

that is otherwise largely inaccessible

Foundations

ConvictionTalent develop >> Org performance

TensionThe bind

MethodOptions & agendas

Best practice

Executives

Delivery structures

RelationshipCoaches

ReportingEnvironment Organisational performance

Individual development

Contact details

Gavin [email protected]

PO Box 55St Kilda VIC 3182

0425 795 675