EXAMPLE PRESENTATION Sweet Gum Stomatal Characteristics

download EXAMPLE PRESENTATION Sweet Gum Stomatal Characteristics

of 5

Transcript of EXAMPLE PRESENTATION Sweet Gum Stomatal Characteristics

  • 8/19/2019 EXAMPLE PRESENTATION Sweet Gum Stomatal Characteristics

    1/8

    9/23/20

    Testing Stomatal Density in

    LeavesAuthors deleted

    Transpiration in Plants

    Evaporation of water from stomata

    Loss of water creates pulling force

    Helps plants collect vital minerals

    97% of water evaporates

    Transpiration Rates

    increase in higher temperature and wind

    regulated by stomatal opening and closing

  • 8/19/2019 EXAMPLE PRESENTATION Sweet Gum Stomatal Characteristics

    2/8

    9/23/20

    Formulating Research Topic

    Leaf thickness article:

    Relates thickness/stomatal density to light intensity

    Leaves in direct sun thicker more stomata

    Plant-water relations article:

    Stomatal density affects transpiration rates affect

    photosynthesis rates

    Light of low intensity less effective than stronger

    illumination in inducing stomatal opening

    Formulating Research Topic

    Questions

    Sun v. shade effect # of stomata?

    Sun v. shade effect rate of transpiration?

    • Hypothesis

    Differences exist regarding stomatal density and

    transpiration rates when Liquidambarst styraciflua(Sweetgum) is located in a sunny environment and when it

    is located in a shady environment

    • Prediction

    Leaves in sunny environment have higher stomatal density

  • 8/19/2019 EXAMPLE PRESENTATION Sweet Gum Stomatal Characteristics

    3/8

    9/23/20

    Architecture of Experiment

    Testing

    Leaves

    Sunny v. Shady

    Conditions

    SweetgumLiquidambarst styraciflua

    •Large tree

    •Easily identified by Leaves•Not native to California

  • 8/19/2019 EXAMPLE PRESENTATION Sweet Gum Stomatal Characteristics

    4/8

    9/23/20

    Methods & Materials

    Test: Porometer measures stomatal conductance

    1. Find Sweet gum in shade

    2. Get reading, repeat for sun environment

    3. 6 Readings in total!

    Sample Size: 6 plants

    3 in shade

    3 in sun

    Location: LMU School grounds

    Statistics: T-Test

    Methods & Materials

    Test: Nail Polish Leaf Impression1. Acquire 6 sunny & 6 shady leaves

    2. Coat polish on both halves

    3. Place tape on polish, remove

    4. Tape on slides, view under microscope

    5. Count stomata

    Statistics: T-Test

  • 8/19/2019 EXAMPLE PRESENTATION Sweet Gum Stomatal Characteristics

    5/8

  • 8/19/2019 EXAMPLE PRESENTATION Sweet Gum Stomatal Characteristics

    6/8

  • 8/19/2019 EXAMPLE PRESENTATION Sweet Gum Stomatal Characteristics

    7/8

    9/23/20

    Results

    CalculatingStomataDensity

    Totalstomata/F.O.V

    mm^2

    Results

    Porometer P value = 0.0318

    P < .05

    Hypothesis Stands

    • Stomata Count• P value= 1.25781E-07

    • P < .05

    Hypothesis Stands

  • 8/19/2019 EXAMPLE PRESENTATION Sweet Gum Stomatal Characteristics

    8/8

    9/23/20

    Conclusion

    Differences exist b/w stomatal density of Sweet gum

    leaves in a sunny v. shady environment

    Higher stomatal density in sun

    Lower in shade

    T-Test Supports Claim

    Prediction Correct

    Leaves in sun need higher stomatal density to facilitate &

    control transpiration rates since in direct sunlight.

    Literature Cited

    Terashima, I. "Irradiance and Phenotype: Comparative

    Eco-development of Sun and Shade Leaves in Relation to

    Photosynthetic CO2 Diffusion." Journal of Experimental

    Botany 57.2 (2005): 343-54. Print.

    Bernard S. Meyer, "Plant-water relations," in

    AccessScience, ©McGraw-Hill Companies, 2008,

    http://www.accessscience.com