Evalution In Et
description
Transcript of Evalution In Et
![Page 1: Evalution In Et](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082916/5498ed6db47959f21e8b458b/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Evaluation in educational technology
Done by: Mi Al-Nasri
Kareema Al-Siyabi
![Page 2: Evalution In Et](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082916/5498ed6db47959f21e8b458b/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Outline:
First Study:
Evaluation methodology in Educational technology
Second Study:
Evaluation of specific technology features
![Page 3: Evalution In Et](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082916/5498ed6db47959f21e8b458b/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
First Study:
Evaluation methodology in
Educational technology
![Page 4: Evalution In Et](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082916/5498ed6db47959f21e8b458b/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Title of Study
The Integrated Studies of Educational
Technology: A Formative Evaluation of the
E-Rate Program
![Page 5: Evalution In Et](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082916/5498ed6db47959f21e8b458b/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
purpose
This study focused to answer these two main
questions:
To what extent is the E-Rate helping to equalize
access to the types of digital technology eligible for
program discounts?
Are schools and teachers able to use the technology
that E-Rate supports? How is it being used in the
classroom?
![Page 6: Evalution In Et](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082916/5498ed6db47959f21e8b458b/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Instruments
The data -for answering two questions- was collected using the following data sources:
1. ISET surveys conducted during school year 2000–2001, including the following surveys:
a survey of technology coordinator in all 50 states and the District of Columbia,
The Survey of District Technology Coordinators The Survey of School Principals The Survey of Classroom Teachers.
![Page 7: Evalution In Et](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082916/5498ed6db47959f21e8b458b/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Instruments
2. E-Rate administrative data covering all E-
Rate applications and funded commitments
through January 2000.
![Page 8: Evalution In Et](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082916/5498ed6db47959f21e8b458b/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Second Study:Evaluation of specific technology
features
![Page 9: Evalution In Et](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082916/5498ed6db47959f21e8b458b/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Title of Study
Statistics E-learning Platforms Evaluation: Case Study
![Page 10: Evalution In Et](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082916/5498ed6db47959f21e8b458b/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Purpose
This study aims to examine the effect on using e-
learning platforms in statistics course, through the
study course, gender, previous experience with e-
learning, understanding statistics, study level,
structured format, and self-study, the flexibility and
freedom in dealing with the course, interactive
environment and e-learning problems.
![Page 11: Evalution In Et](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082916/5498ed6db47959f21e8b458b/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Evaluation of e-learning platforms Features
Flexibility: This feature is evaluated using this question: “Do
you think that e-learning platforms give you the
freedom and flexibility to work with the course?”.
The question is re-classified into 4 categories:
Yes, partial, no, I do not know.
![Page 12: Evalution In Et](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082916/5498ed6db47959f21e8b458b/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Evaluation of e-learning platforms Features
Structured format:
The question was evaluated by students using
the following question: What is your opinion about
the structured format of e-learning platform which
you have used?
This variable is re-classified into 4 categories:
Good, acceptable, bad, I do not know.
![Page 13: Evalution In Et](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082916/5498ed6db47959f21e8b458b/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Evaluation of e-learning platforms Features
Self-study:. The following question was distributed to
students: Do you think that e-learning platforms
improves and increases your self-study?
This variable is re-classified into 4 categories:
Yes, partial, no, i do not know.
![Page 14: Evalution In Et](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082916/5498ed6db47959f21e8b458b/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Evaluation of e-learning platforms Features
Interactive environment: The question was to the students: What are your opinions
about the interactive environment of e-learning platforms?
This variable is re-classified into 4 categories:
Good,
acceptable,
bad,
I do not know.
![Page 15: Evalution In Et](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082916/5498ed6db47959f21e8b458b/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Reference
J. Puma.M, D. Chaplin.D, M. Olson.K, C. Pandjiris.A. (October 2002).
The Integrated Studies of Educational Technology: A Formative
Evaluation of the E-Rate Program. The Urban Institute. Washington,
DC 20037-1207.
Ahmad .T, H¨ardle.W.( August 31, 2008)Statistics E-learning Platforms
Evaluation: Case Study _ CASE - Center for Applied Statistics and
Economics Humboldt-Universit¨at zu Berlin. Spandauerstrasse 1,
10178 Berlin, Germany. Retrived on 14/2/2008 from:
http://www.econbiz.de/archiv1/2008/58778_statistics_elearning_platforms.pdf