EVALUATION

Rules1. The class will be divided into three teams. Each team will have a colored

flag to use as a buzzer to ring in their readiness to answer the question. Teams signify their desire to answer a question by raising their flag, not by replying out loud. A team will automatically lose $500 if they shout out the answer.

2. The team to choose first will be decided by rolling a dice- highest number goes first. The first team will choose a category and monetary amount.

3. The emcee will then read the question. The first team to raise their flag will have the opportunity to respond after they are recognized by the scorekeeper.

4. If the team answers correctly, they receive the designated amount of $$ and have the opportunity to choose another category and monetary amount. If they do not answer correctly, they lose the designated amount of points and the team that raised their flag second will have the opportunity to answer.

5. If a team gets a “Daily Double” question only that team can answer the question. They must first wager a bet- from $1 to the amount of $$ they currently have.

6. After the last question is answered, or time runs out, the team with the most money wins. If there is a tie, a final jeopardy round will occur with one bonus question that can apply to any of the approaches.

EVALUATION

Evaluation JeopardyObjective Management Consumer Expertise Participant Empowerment

100 100 100 100 100 100

200 200 200 200 200 200

300 300 300 300 300 300

400 400 400 400 400 400

500 500 500 500 500 500

Objective-oriented evaluation was developedmainly in what field (or area)?

What are the methods defined by Sandersand Cunningham to evaluate goals and objectives themselves?

List at least two weaknesses of Objective-oriented evaluation.

List three types of programs that wouldmost likely use Objective-oriented evaluation.

Take a stand either for or against the use of the Sunshine State Standards in the front of text books.

Provide two reasons to substantiate your position.

List three stakeholders who mightfind this evaluation method useful.

Define the acronym CIPP and state who developed this method.

Describe two strengths of this form of evaluation.

List at least two weaknesses of Management-oriented evaluation.

The Home County School District has to make some decisions about the budget and possible program cuts.

Who might participate in the evaluation process? What groups might be left outin this evaluation proces?

Describe the stakeholder who wouldbe attending this type of evaluation workshop.

What is one of the items in Scriven’s checklist associated with dissemination plan, size, and importance of potential commercial activities?

What is the contribution of the Consumer-oriented approach on consumers’ knowledge in selecting educational products?

What is the impact on the cost of the product with a Consumer-oriented approach to evaluation?

You are doing an evaluation on various FSU online career workshops such as career exploration, employment strategies, matching occupation, developing a curriculum vita, etc.

How would you compile information with regard to the effectiveness type of questions?

Schools, universities and hospitals are the primary stakeholders in what formal professional review system?

What is the type of approach in which published standards are used as part of the review?

List at least two general benefits of the expertise-oriented approaches.

What might occur if a program is evaluated only by those with expertise in program content?

Suppose you are conducting an evaluation on the gym facilities at FSU, (e.g. The Leach Center).

Assuming a limited budget, who would you include in your expert panels?

Oppressed or maligned stakeholders are those participants represented by which Participant-oriented approach?

Developing general principles from a limited set of observations is a key feature of Participant-oriented evaluations.

What is the name for this way of drawing conclusions?

List three benefits of Participant-oriented approaches.

Take any two benefits of this approach and explain how they can also be weaknesses.

In 2002 BYU conducted an evaluation of the learning technologies used in their online courses. At least five different stakeholder groups participated.

List at least three stakeholder groups who may have been included and give one example of the data each group could have used in the evaluation.

How are the roles of the evaluator and participant different in Empowerment evaluation?

Describe at least two ways that the evaluator acts as a facilitator or “critical friend” during Empowerment evaluation activities.

Briefly explain why training is considered one of strengths of Empowerment evaluation?

List at least three limitations of Empowerment evaluation.

A statewide HIV prevention program must produce outcome-based evaluation findings in order to receive state and federal funds. They have decided to use an Empowerment evaluation approach as a pilot in one of their outreach centers that can then be used statewide.

Identify at least three groups of stakeholders and briefly explain whether this approach is a good or bad choice.

What is another name for the “thick” contextual descriptions used in Participant-oriented evaluations?

Capacity-building is mentioned as one of the strengths of empowerment evaluations.

In a few sentences, describe how empowerment evaluations are capacity-building.