Evaluation of the Rethink Your Drink 9th-12th Grade ...npi.ucanr.edu/files/294030.pdfA Rethink Your...
Transcript of Evaluation of the Rethink Your Drink 9th-12th Grade ...npi.ucanr.edu/files/294030.pdfA Rethink Your...
Evaluation of the Rethink Your Drink 9th-12th Grade Curriculum, 2017 Prepared for: California Department of Public Health Nutrition Education and Obesity Prevention Branch Prepared by: Nutrition Education and Obesity Prevention Research and Evaluation Unit, Nutrition Policy Institute, University of California, Division of Agriculture & Natural Resources Authors: Ron Strochlic, MS, Nutrition Policy Institute, University of California, Division of Agriculture & Natural Resources Kaela Plank, MPH, Nutrition Policy Institute, University of California, Division of Agriculture & Natural Resources Sridharshi Hewawitharana, MPH, Nutrition Policy Institute, University of California, Division of Agriculture & Natural Resources Marianne Hernandez, MS, Nutrition Education and Obesity Prevention Branch, California Department of Public Health Jackie Richardson, MIB, Nutrition Education and Obesity Prevention Branch, California Department of Public Health Kenneth Hecht, JD Unit Director, Nutrition Policy Institute
Pat Crawford, DrPH, RD Principal Investigator, Nutrition Policy Institute
July 2018
This material was funded by USDA's Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program-SNAP This project was supported by funds received from the State of California, Department of Public Health.
i
ExecutiveSummaryRethinkYourDrink(RYD)isaCaliforniaDepartmentofPublicHealth(CDPH)NutritionEducationObesityPreventionBranch(NEOPB)Initiativedesignedtoprovidenutritioneducationanddevelopskills,suchaslabelreading,tohelppeoplemakehealthierbeveragechoicesincludingwater,fat-freeorlow-fat(1%)milk,and100%juiceinlimitedamounts.ARethinkYourDrinkhighschoolcurriculumtargetingstudentsingrades9-12wasdevelopedin2012.Thecurriculumpromotesfourkeybehaviors:• Drinkwaterinsteadofsugarydrinkssuchassodas,energydrinks,andjuicedrinks.• Choosefromavarietyofhealthydrinkoptionssuchaswater,1%milk,fat-freemilk,100%
fruitjuice,orunsweetenedteaorcoffeeoversugarydrinks.• UsetheNutritionFactslabeltochoosefoodsandbeverageswithlesstotalsugars.• UsetheIngredientListtochoosefoodsandbeverageswithlittleornoaddedsugars.Thecurriculumconsistsoffour50-60-minutelessonsthatbuildononeanotherandaredesignedtobetaughtoverthecourseofseveralweeks.Learningobjectivesaretoexpandstudentunderstandingoftheeffectsofexcessivesugarconsumptiononhealth;increaseawarenessofwhichbeveragesstudentsandtheirpeerschoosetodrinkandreasonsforchoosingthosebeverages;communicatetheimportanceofaccessingvalidhealthinformationandteachstudentshowtousethenutritionfactslabelstocomparesugarcontentofvariousbeverages;identifyandevaluatetheinternalandexternalinfluencesthataffectfoodandbeveragechoices;identifythestepsofthedecision-makingprocessanduseittomakehealthierbeveragechoices.AnevaluationoftheRYDcurriculumwasconductedbytheUniversityofCaliforniaNutritionPolicyInstitutein2017toaddressthefollowingquestions:• WhatimpactsdidtheRYDcurriculumhaveonhighschoolstudents’knowledge,attitudes
andbehaviorsregardingsugar-sweetenedandnon-sugarydrinks?• Whatwereteacherandstudentperceptionsofthecurriculum?• Whatrecommendationsdidteachersandstudentshaveforenhancingandimprovingthe
curriculum?
Evaluationmethodsincludeda2-grouppre-posttestadministeredtointerventionandcomparisongroupstudentsimmediatelypriortoandfollowingcurriculumimplementation;focusgroupdiscussionswithinterventiongroupstudents;anonlinesurveyofinterventiongroupteachers;andsemi-structuredinterviewswithinterventiongroupteachers.Thestudentsurveyassessedbehaviors,knowledge,self-efficacy,andattitudes,whilestudentfocusgroupsassessedperceptionsofthecurriculumandrecommendationsforimprovements.Theteachersurveyassessedcurriculumimplementation,whiletheteacherinterviewselicitedperceptionsofthecurriculumandrecommendationsforimprovements.
ii
Keyfindingsfromthestudentsurveyincludethefollowing:• Withrespecttoconsumptionpatterns,therewasnosignificantdifferenceinthenumber
ofsugarsweetenedbeveragesconsumed,suchassoda,sportsdrinksandflavoredmilk,betweeninterventionandcomparisongroupstudents.However,theinterventionwasassociatedwithaslightbutstatisticallysignificantdecreaseinconsumptionofdietsodaaswellaswithasmallincreaseinthenumberoftypesofhealthydrinksstudentschosewheneatingout(0.19;95%CI:0.05,0.34).
• StudentsexposedtotheRYDcurriculumreportedincreaseduseofnutrientlabelingofbeveragesascomparedtostudentsnotexposedtoit.Interventionstudentsreportedasmall,butstatisticallysignificantgreaterincreaseinthefrequencyofreadingtheNutritionFactsLabelwhenchoosingadrinkcomparedtocomparisongroupstudents(0.10;95%CI:0.03,0.17).
• TheRYDcurriculumhadlimitedeffectsonknowledgeassociatedwithself-efficacy.Interventionstudentsreportedasmallbutstatisticallysignificantgreaterincreaseintheirunderstandingofreasonsforchoosingcertainbeveragesascomparedtocomparisongroupstudents(0.19;95%CI:0.07,0.32).
• TheRYDcurriculumhadnosignificantimpactsonstudentattitudesregardingconsumptionofsugarandsugarydrinks.
• StudentsreceivingtheRYDcurriculumreportedchangesintheinfluenceoftwofactorsaffectingbeveragechoice.Theinterventionwasassociatedwithsmallbutsignificantdecreasesintheself-reportedamountofinfluenceofnumberofcaloriesinadrink(0.17;95%CI:0.11,0.23)aswellasbeverageadvertisements(0.18;95%CI:0.12,0.24)onbeveragechoice.
Keyfindingsfromtheteachersurveyandinterviewsandstudentfocusgroupsincludethefollowing:• Teachersfeltpositivelyaboutthecurriculum.Teachersagreedwiththefollowing
statementsregardingeachofthelessons:“Thetrainingadequatelypreparedmetoteachthislesson,”“Ifeltadequatelypreparedtoteachthislesson,”and“TheContentStandardshelpedidentifythelesson’sfitwithgrade-levelinstructionrequirements.”
• Teachersbelievedthatthelessonswerewell-alignedwithlearningobjectives.Nearlyallteachersfeltthelessonswere“very”or“somewhat”well-alignedwiththelearningobjectivespresentedforeachlesson.
• Teachersdidnotimplementallcomponentsofthecurriculum.Duetolackoftimeand/orreluctancetoburdenstudentswithadditionalhomework,teachersconsistentlyreportedthattheydidnotincorporatethelastcomponentsofthecurriculum.
• Thecurriculummaybemoreeffectivewithyoungerstudents.Studentsfeltthathighschoolstudentshaveingrainedhabitsthatcanbehardtobreak,whileteachersnotedtheinformationwasredundantforsomestudents,whohadalreadybeenexposedtoit.
iii
ThelimitedimpactoftheRYDcurriculumonthekeyoutcomesofinterest,i.e.studentintakeofsugarydrinksandhealthyalternativessuggeststhatthatthiscurricularapproachalonemaybeinsufficienttoachievebehaviorchangeonitsown.ThatisconsistentwiththeSNAP-Edtheoryofchange,whichpositsthatacombinationofeducationalapproaches,policysystemsandenvironmentalchange(PSE),andsocialmarketingarerequiredtoachieveconsistentandenduringbehaviorchange.EvaluationfindingssuggestthatthecurriculumshouldberevisedinaccordancewiththestudentandteacherfeedbackandimplementedwithcomplementaryPSEandsocialmarketingapproaches.
1
Introduction
RethinkYourDrink(RYD)isaCaliforniaDepartmentofPublicHealth(CDPH)NutritionEducationObesityPreventionBranch(NEOPB)Initiativedesignedtoprovidenutritioneducationanddevelopskills,suchaslabelreading,tohelppeoplemakehealthierbeveragechoicesincludingwater,fat-freeorlow-fat(1%)milk,and100%juiceinlimitedamounts.Recenteffortstotaxsugarydrinkshaveraisedawarenessoftheirimpactonhealthandhavemadeeffortstopromotehealthybeveragechoicesparticularlytimely.NEOPB,whichisfundedbytheUnitedStatesDepartmentofAgricultureSupplementalNutritionAssistanceProgram-Education(SNAP-Ed),addressesrisingobesityratesthroughstatewide,regional,andlocalprogramsandpartnershipsthatpromotehealthyeating,physicalactivity,andfoodsecuritywithanemphasisoncommunitieswiththegreatesthealthdisparities.
In2009,theBayAreaNutritionandPhysicalActivityCollaborative(BANPAC)launchedthefirstmulti-countyRethinkYourDrinknutritioneducationcampaigntoencouragetheconsumptionofwaterinsteadofsugarydrinks.ThecampaignwasimplementedinsixBayAreacounties:Alameda,ContraCosta,Marin,SanFrancisco,SanMateoandSantaClara,andincludedconsumereducationaswellasrecommendationsforenvironmentalsupportsthatpartnerorganizationscouldimplementtofacilitateconsumerchoiceandincreaseaccesstohealthybeverages.ThecampaignwasbasedontheAlamedaCountyPublicHealthDepartment’ssuccessfulSodaFreeSummerCampaign,aseason-longpublichealtheventthatencouragedconsumerstodrinkwaterinsteadofsoda.
The2010DietaryGuidelinesforAmericans(DGA),urgedAmericanstoconsumefeweraddedsugars,specificallyfromsodasandothersugarydrinks.iIn2012,CDPHreleasedaresearchbriefbasedontheresultsofthreestatewidesurveysondietandphysicalactivitypracticesamongadults,teens,andchildren.iiThesurveyfindingsrevealedthatapproximatelyhalfofCaliforniachildren,teens,andadultsdrankatleastoneservingofasugarydrinkdaily.TheCDPHbriefalsohighlightedassociationsbetweensugarsweetenedbeverageintakeanddemographicandsocioeconomicfactors;consumptionofhealthyandlesshealthyfoods;healthbehaviors;psychosocialfactors;andthehome,work,andschoolenvironments.BasedonthesefindingsanddirectionfromtheDGA,CaliforniaSNAP-Ed,withCDPHsupport,begantoimplementhealthybeverageeducationstatewidethroughlocalandregionalefforts.Today,RethinkYourDrinkisprimarilyimplementedthroughSNAP-Ed-fundedlocalpartners.
ThisreportpresentstheresultsofanevaluationoftheRethinkYourDrinkeducationalprogramdesignedforandimplementedamong9ththrough12thgradestudents.Previousevaluationsofschool-basedcurriculapromotinghealthybeveragechoicesamongelementaryagestudentshaveshownmixedresults.Whereassomefoundself-reportedreductionsinsugarydrinkconsumptioniii,ivalongwithincreasedwaterconsumption,vothersfoundnochangesinself-reportedsugarydrinkorwaterconsumption.vi,viiNostudieswithcomparablecurriculatargetinghighschoolyouthwereidentified.
2
BackgroundoftheRethinkYourDrinkHighSchoolCurriculum
TheRethinkYourDrinkhighschoolcurriculumemergedfromadesiretoprovideskills-basedhealthybeverageinstructiontoadolescents,agroupwithhighratesofsugar-sweetenedbeverageconsumption.ThelessonsweredevelopedtocomplementexistingRethinkYourDrinkmaterials,aswellasotherhealthybeveragematerialsdevelopedbytheAlamedaCountyPublicHealthDepartment,BANPAC,theOrangeCountyNutritionandPhysicalActivityCollaborative,theNorthcoastNutritionandFitnessCollaborative,andtheGoldCountryHealthEatingActiveLivingCollaborative.Inpartnershipwithclassroomteachers,whosefeedbackwasincludedin2011,andeducationandpublichealthexperts,NEOPBdevelopedtheRethinkYourDrinkhighschoolcurriculumin2012.Thecurriculumwaspilot-testedattenin-andafter-schoolprogramsservingmiddleandhigh-school-agedyoutharoundthestate.ThepilottestwasevaluatedbyreviewersfromCDPH,theCaliforniaHealthyKidsResourceCenterandtheCaliforniaDepartmentofEducation.Twoschooldistrictcoordinatorsalsocontributedrecommendationsforimprovement.ThematerialswerereleasedforstatewideimplementationthroughSNAP-Edfundedprojectsin2012.Sincethen,thematerialshavebeenrevisedtoreflecttheupdated2015-2020DGAsandthecurriculumhasbeenshortenedtoensurethatthelessonscanbecompletedwithinaverageclasstimeof50-60minutes.
TheRYDhighschoollessonsincorporatenutritionandphysicalactivityrecommendationsfromtheUnitedStatesDepartmentofAgricultureandtheDepartmentofHealthandHumanServices’2015DietaryGuidelinesforAmericansandthe2008PhysicalActivityGuidelines,whichemphasizetheimportanceofbalancingcaloricintakewithphysicalactivity.Onesignificantrecommendationincludeslimitingcaloricintakefromsoda,energy,andsportsdrinks—eachamajorsourceofaddedsugarandcaloriesinthedietofmanyAmericans.
TheRYDcurriculumisalsobasedontheHealthEducationContentStandardsforCaliforniaPublicSchools,viiiwhichidentifyessentialhealthknowledgeandskillsthatstudentsshouldhaveateachgradelevel,andtheCaliforniaNutritionCompetenciesixforgrades9-12,whichidentifynutritionknowledgeandskillsstudentsneedtomakehealthfulfoodchoices.
TheRYDHighSchoolCurriculumpromotesfourkeybehaviorsamongstudents:• Drinkwaterinsteadofsugarydrinkssuchassodas,energydrinks,andjuicedrinks.• Choosefromavarietyofhealthydrinkoptionssuchaswater,1%milk,fat-freemilk,100%
fruitjuice,orunsweetenedteaorcoffeeoversugarydrinks.• UsetheNutritionFactslabeltochoosefoodsandbeverageswithlesstotalsugars.• UsetheIngredientListtochoosefoodsandbeverageswithlittleornoaddedsugars.DescriptionoftheRethinkYourDrinkcurriculum
Thecurriculumincludestwolessons,eachofwhichconsistsoftwoparts,foratotaloffour50-60-minutesessionsthataresequential,buildononeanother,andaredesignedtobetaughtoverthecourseofseveralweeks.Eachlessoncontainsanoverviewofitsobjectives,key
3
messages,materials,andadditionalreferences,andidentifiesCaliforniaHealthEducationContentStandards,andCaliforniaNutritionEducationCompetenciesaddressed.LessoncomponentsincludeaWarmUp,MainActivity,CoolDown,CheckforLearning,HomeConnection,andExtension/Links.Extensionideasandlinkstoothercoresubjectandcontentareasareincludedforgreaterapplicationoftheskillslearned.Thecurriculumincludesteacherresources,lessonoutline,andlessonhandouts.Theestimatedteacherpreparationtimeis20minutesforeachlesson.
Lesson1(“What’sinYourDrink?”)isdividedintoLesson1A“LearningtheFacts”andLesson1B“SugarSleuths.”Lesson2(“ThinkBeforeYouDrink!”)isdividedintoLesson2A“WhatInfluencesYourHealth?”andLesson2B“ChoosingDrinksforHealth.”
Lesson1A’slearningobjectivesaretoexpandunderstandingoftheeffectsofexcessivesugarconsumptiononoverallhealthandtoincreaseawarenessofwhatbeveragesstudentsandtheirpeerschoosetodrinkaswellasreasonsforchoosingspecificbeverages.Activitiesinclude“LearningtheFactsCardsMatch-up”and“LearningtheFactsBingo,”interactiveactivitiesinwhichstudentsmatchfactsanddefinitionsorquestionsandanswers.Lesson1Ahasanoptionalhomeworkactivityinwhichstudentsinterviewfamilymembersaboutbeveragesthattheydrinkandhowtheyfeelaboutthehealtheffectsoftheirchoices.
Lesson1B’slearningobjectivesaretocommunicatetheimportanceofaccessingvalidhealthinformationandtoteachstudentshowtousetheNutritionFactslabelstocomparesugarcontentofvariousbeverages.Activitiesinclude“HowMuchSugar,”inwhichstudentslearntocalculatetheamountofsugarindifferentbeveragesusingsugarcubes,andthe“NutritionFactsScavengerHunt,”inwhichstudentslearntoreadtheNutritionFactslabel.AnoptionalhomeworkactivityconsistsoffillinginablankNutritionFactslabelworksheetwithinformationabouttwodrinksconsumedathome.
Lesson2A’slearningobjectivesaretoidentifyandevaluatetheinternalandexternalinfluencesthataffectfoodandbeveragechoices.The“WhatAreMyInfluences?”activitypromotesstudentawarenessofthereasonsbehindbeveragechoices.Themandatoryhomeworkassignment,“AssessingMyDrinkOptions,”encouragesstudentstothinkaboutthefactorsinfluencingtheirpersonalbeveragechoices.
Lesson2B’slearningobjectivesaretoidentifythestepsofthedecision-makingprocessandhowtouseittomakehealthierbeveragechoices.Lessonactivitiesincludethe“Decision-MakingProcess,”inwhichstudentsdiscusstheresultsoftheLesson2A“AssessingMyDrinkOptions”homeworkassignmentinsmallgroups,andthe“ChooseaHealthyDrinkChallenge,”inwhichstudentscommittochoosinghealthierbeveragesbasedonanevaluationofvaluesandconsequences,andmakeaplantocarryouttheirdecision.Studentsreceivea“HealthyBeverageHighlights”handoutsummarizingallkeymessagesafterthislesson.
4
Theneedforapilottesttoexamineprogrameffectivenessandimplementationchallenges
AnevaluationofthisprogramwasconductedbyNPIin2017.ItwasguidedbythedesireoftheCDPHtobetterunderstandthebenefitsofthecurriculumandwaysinwhichimplementationcouldbeenhanced.Theevaluationaddressedthefollowingquestions:• WhatimpactsdidtheRYDcurriculumhaveonhighschoolstudents’knowledge,attitudes
andbehaviorsregardingsugar-sweetenedandnon-sugarydrinks?• Whatwereteacherandstudentperceptionsofthecurriculum?• Whatrecommendationsdidteachersandstudentshaveforenhancingandimprovingthe
curriculum?
Selectingsitesforthepilottest
AlistofhighschoolsinSacramentoandYoloCountiesmeetingtheSNAP-Edqualifyingthresholdofatleast50percentofstudentseligibleforfreeorreducedpricemealsandwithcomparabledemographiccharacteristics,wascompiled.CDPHstaffcontactedschooladministratorsatqualifyingschoolstoassessinterestinparticipatinginthiseffort.AdministratorsexpressinginterestdirectedCDPHstafftospecificteachers,whowerecontactedbyCDPHstaffandofferedastipendforparticipation.Seventeachersatfiveschoolsagreedtoparticipate.Thefinalsampleconsistedofthreeinterventionschools(twoinSacramentoCountyandoneinYoloCounty)andtwocomparisonschools(oneinSacramentoCountyandoneinYoloCounty),withfourandthreeteachersrespectively.Threeinterventiongroupteachersvolunteeredtoimplementthecurriculuminmorethanoneclass.Thefinalinterventiongroupconsistedofeightclasses,includingHealth(n=2classes),AVID(collegeprep,n=2classes),Economics(n=3classes),andPhysicalEducation(n=1class).Thecomparisongroupconsistedofthreeteacherswithoneclasseach:Health,PhysicalEducationandForensics.Allstudentsininterventionandcomparisonclassroomswereeligibletoparticipateintheevaluation.ParticipantdemographicsarepresentedinTable1.
Methodsusedtoexaminetheeffectivenessofthecurriculum
TheRYDcurriculum’simpactonstudentknowledge,attitudes,andbehaviorswasassessedviapre/post-testsurveyadministeredintheclassroom.An“optout”letterwassenthometostudents’parents/guardians,providinginformationabouttheresearchandrequestingthatparents/guardiansreturnasignedlettertotheschooliftheydidnotwanttheirchildtoparticipateinthispieceoftheevaluation.Studentswereinformedtheycoulddeclinetoparticipateinthesurveywithnonegativeconsequences.
Interventiongroupstudentscompletedtheself-administeredpre-testandpost-testsurveysduringclasstime,twoweekspriortoandthreeweeksfollowingimplementationofthe
5
curriculum.Comparisongroupstudentscompletedthesurveyswithinthesametimeframe.StudentswhooptedoutoftheRethinkYourDrinkevaluationcompletedanalternateactivityinordertoremainindistinguishablefromparticipants.Membersoftheresearchteamproctoredsurveyadministration,andansweredstudents’questions.
ThestudentsurveysincludedquestionsadaptedfromtheNEOPB“WhatDoYouDrink?”survey(unpublished)aswellasnewly-developedquestions.Bothpre-testandpost-testsurveysassessedstudentbehaviors,knowledge,self-efficacy,andattitudes:• Behaviors:frequencyofconsumptionofsugar-andnon-sugarsweetenedbeverages
(times/day);preferredtypeofmilk;mostfrequentlyconsumedbeveragesathome,schoolandwhenout;frequencyofreadingtheNutritionFactsLabelandIngredientsListwhenchoosingadrink(4-pointscale:Always,Usually,Sometimes,Never);
• Knowledge:abilitytorankbeveragesbasedonsugarcontent,identifybeverageswithaddedsugar,identifytheamountofsugarinabeverage,identifyhealthimpactsofsugarconsumptionandidentifybeverageswithaddedsugarbasedonareviewoftheNutritionFactsLabelandIngredientsList;andunderstandingofthedifferencebetweennaturally-occurringandaddedsugars(4-pointscale:Verywell,Somewhatwell,Notverywell,Notatallwell);
• Self-efficacy:confidenceinabilitytoidentifyahealthybeverageandfindvalidhealthinformationaboutdifferentbeverages(4-pointscale:Veryconfident,Somewhatconfident,Notveryconfident,Notatallconfident);self-perceptionofextenttowhichtheyunderstandtheirreasonsforchoosingcertainbeverages(4-pointscale:Verywell,Somewhatwell,Notverywell,Notatallwell);
• Attitudes:agreementwithstatementsthat“Consumingtoomuchsugarcanimpactmyhealth”and“Iwouldliketodrinkfewersweeteneddrinks”(5-pointscale:Stronglyagree,agree,don’tagreeordisagree,Disagree,Stronglydisagree);andextenttowhichinternalandexternalfactorsinfluencebeveragechoices(4-pointscale:Alot,Alittle,Notmuch,Notatall).
Allstudentswhocompletedboththepre-andpost-testsurveywereincludedintheanalysis.Intheanalysis,ordinalcategoricaloutcomesweretreatedascontinuousoutcomesandanalysisofcovariancewasconductedontheirchangescores,controllingforpre-testscores.Forbinaryoutcomes,generalizedestimatingequationsmodelswerefitusingprocgenmod.Allanalyseswereadjustedforgrade,gender,andrace/ethnicity,andaccountedforclusteringbyteacher.AllanalyseswereconductedusingSAS9.4.
Methodsusedtocollectteacherandstudentfeedback
TeacherandstudentinputregardingtheRYDcurriculumwaselicitedviaasurveyofandinterviewswithinterventiongroupteachersandfocusgroupswithinterventiongroupstudents.Teacherswereaskedtocompleteanonlinesurveytoprovidefeedbackonthecurriculumand
6
lessonimplementationafterteachingeachlesson.Toencouragetimelyresponse,linkstothesurveysweresenttoteachersonceaweekonthedaytheywerescheduledtoteacheachlesson.Thesurveyelicitedteacherperceptionsregardingpreparednesstoteachthelesson;organization;clarityofinstructions;timeallocation;lessonflow;appropriatenessoflearninglevel;studentengagement;appropriatenessfordiverseculturesandindividuals;modifications;andfeedbackonindividuallessoncomponents.
Inaddition,semi-structuredkey-informantinterviewswereconductedwitheachoftheinterventionteacherswithinfourweeksofcompletingthecurriculum.Theinterviewselicitedteacherperceptionsofthecurriculum,includinghowwellthecurriculummetitsoverallobjectiveofincreasingstudentknowledgeandpromotinghealthybeveragechoices,alongwithrecommendationsforimprovingthecurriculum.
Twofocusgroupswereconductedwith9thgradeinterventiongroupstudentsattwoschoolswithinthefour-weekperiodfollowingcurriculumcompletion.Participationinthefocusgroupswasonan“opt-in”basis,requiringsignedparentalconsentandstudentassent.Lettersweresenthometoparents/guardiansexplainingthepurposeofthefocusgroupsandrequestingsignedconsentforstudentstoparticipate.Studentswereinformedthattheycoulddeclineparticipationinthefocusgroupswithnonegativeconsequences.
Twenty-oneparentsprovidedconsentandthirteenstudentsagreedtoparticipateinfocusgroups(nineatoneschool,fouratanother),whichlasted23and40minutes,respectively.
Thefocusgroupstookplaceduringschoolhoursinprivateclassroomsateachschoolsite.Eachfocusgroupwasconductedbytwomembersoftheresearchteam,withonefacilitatingandtheothertakingnotesandaskingoccasionalfollowupquestions.Inaddition,aschoolstaffmemberwaspresentateachfocusgroup,inaccordancewithschoolregulations.Toreducepotentialbias,theschoolstaffmemberwasnotintimatelyfamiliarwiththestudents,satatadistancefromthefocusgroup,andworkedonunrelatedmaterial.Afocusgroupscriptwasusedtoreduceinterviewerbiasduringdiscussions.
Thefocusgroupselicitedstudents’perceptionsoftheRYDcurriculum,including:whichcomponentstheyfeltweremosteffectiveinachievingthecurriculum’sobjectives;whichactivitiestheywouldkeepiftheyweretodesignasimilarcurriculumforhighschoolstudents;howtheywouldmodifythecurriculumtomakeitmoreengaging;andthecurriculum’simpactsonstudentknowledge,attitudesandbehaviorsregardingSSBs.Participantsexandrace/ethnicitywererecordedbasedonobservation.
Thekeyinformantinterviewsandfocusgroupswereaudiorecordedtosupplementdetailednotes.Interviewandfocusgroupresultswereanalyzedusingcontentanalysis.Inadditionto
7
generalfindings,theanalysisidentifiedconcordantanddiscordantemergentthemesbetweenstudentandteacherexperiencesandperspectivesregardingRYD.
Schoolprotocolwasfollowedforon-sitevisitationduringallresearchactivities.Allresearchteammembersunderwentafingerprintscan(LiveScan);acredentialedK-12teacherwaspresentintheroomatalltimes;andschoolsign-in/sign-outprocedureswerefollowed.
Descriptionofthesampleofstudentsselected
Theinterventiongroupconsistedof2489th-12thgradestudentsineightclassroomsatthreepublichighschoolsinSacramentoandYoloCounties,CA.Thecomparisongroupconsistedof1029th-12thgradestudentsinthreeclassroomsattwopublichighschoolinSacramentoandYoloCounties,CA.Theparent/guardianofoneinterventiongroupstudentreturnedasignedletteroptingtheirstudentoutofthesurvey.Twootherstudentsdeclinedtoparticipateinthesurvey.
Threehundredforty-ninestudentscompletedapre-testsurvey(ncomparison=101,nintervention=248)and333studentscompletedapost-testsurvey(ncomparison=102,nintervention=231).Studentswhodidnotcompletebothsurveysweredroppedfromanalyses,yieldingafinalsampleof222interventionand92comparisonstudents.Therewerenosignificantdifferencesbetweeninterventionandcomparisongroupstudentswithrespecttokeydemographiccharacteristics(Table1).
8
Table1.Demographicsofstudentsininterventionandcomparisongroup,RethinkYourDrinkEvaluation,YoloandSacramentoCounties,CA,2016-17(ncomparison=92,nintervention=222) ComparisonGroup InterventionGroup p-value2
n %(SE)1 n %(SE)1GenderMale 47 51.09(7.10) 114 51.35(4.85)
0.174Female 38 41.30(4.52) 104 46.85(5.24)Other 5 5.43(2.21) 3 1.35(1.06)Missing 2 2.17(2.03) 1 0.45(0.43)Grade9th 50 54.35(27.79) 84 37.84(26.21)
0.85610th 6 6.52(6.10) 23 10.36(9.97)11th 15 16.30(13.61) 31 13.96(13.43)12th 15 16.30(13.61) 84 37.84(29.56)Missing 6 6.52(3.18) 0 0.00(0.00)Race/EthnicityMultiple 11 11.96(4.83) 47 21.17(1.73)
0.866
Asian 13 14.13(6.13) 26 11.71(7.00)Black/AfricanAmerican 5 5.43(5.08) 7 3.15(1.72)Latino 47 51.09(8.26) 108 48.65(13.24)White 14 15.22(3.06) 31 13.96(3.98)Missing 2 2.17(1.07) 3 1.35(0.60)
1Percentsadjustedforclusteringbyteacher.2Differencesincategoricalvariablesbetweencomparisonandinterventiongroupsbychi-squaretest.Boldfaceindicatesstatisticalsignificanceatp<0.05.
ImpactoftheRYDcurriculumonstudentknowledge,attitudesandbehavior
StudentsurveyfindingsregardingimpactsoftheRYDcurriculumonstudentknowledge,attitudesandbehaviorarepresentedbelow.Withrespecttoconsumptionpatterns,therewasnotasignificantdifferenceinthenumberofsugarsweetenedbeveragesconsumed,suchassoda,sportsdrinksandflavoredmilk,betweeninterventionandcomparisongroupstudents.However,theinterventionwasassociatedwithaslightbutstatisticallysignificantdecreaseinconsumptionofdietsodaaswellaswithasmallincreaseinthenumberoftypesofhealthydrinksstudentschosewheneatingout(0.19;95%CI:0.05,0.34)(Table2).
9
Table2:ImpactofRethinkYourDrinkcurriculumondietarybehaviorsregardingsugar-andnon-sugarydrinks,RethinkYourDrinkEvaluation,SacramentoandYoloCounties,2017.
InterventionGroup ComparisonGroup
Adjusted1Mean
DifferenceinChangeBetween
Interventionand
Comparison
p-value
n
Adjusted1MeanChange
(post-pre)
n
Adjusted1MeanChange
(post-pre)
(95%ConfidenceInterval)
Dietarybehaviorsinthelast24hoursConsumptionofregularsoda(containers/glasses/bottles/cans) 208 -0.10 82 0.06 -0.16
(-0.42,0.10) 0.23
Consumptionofdietsoda(containers/glasses/bottles/cans) 205 0.03 81 0.12 -0.10
(-0.18,-0.02) 0.02
Consumptionof100%juices210 0.00 82 -0.05
0.060.50
(containers/glasses/bottles/cans) (-0.11,0.22)Consumptionoffruitdrinksandfruitnectars 205 0.11 80 0.18
-0.070.52
(containers/glasses/bottles/cans) (-0.28,0.14)Consumptionofsportsdrinks
210 -0.32 83 -0.320.01
0.95(containers/glasses/bottles/cans) (-0.25,0.26)Consumptionofenergydrinks
213 -0.08 83 -0.080.01
0.93(containers/glasses/bottles/cans) (-0.09,0.10)Consumptionofflavoredmilkandmilktypedrinks 212 0.20 84 0.16
0.040.61
(containers/glasses/bottles/cans) (-0.11,0.19)Consumptionofregularplainwhitemilkormilksubstitutes 210 -0.16 84 -0.17
0.010.90
(containers/glasses/bottles/cans) (-0.20,0.22)Consumptionofreducedfatplainwhitemilk 210 -0.19 83 -0.11
-0.080.44
(containers/glasses/bottles/cans) (-0.29,0.12)Consumptionofsweetenedcoffeeandteadrinks 213 -0.10 84 -0.14
0.040.11
(containers/glasses/bottles/cans) (-0.01,0.08)Consumptionofunsweetenedcoffeeandteadrinks 209 0.11 84 0.14
-0.030.59
(containers/glasses/bottles/cans) (-0.15,0.09)
10
InterventionGroup ComparisonGroup
Adjusted1Mean
DifferenceinChangeBetween
Interventionand
Comparison
p-value
n
Adjusted1MeanChange
(post-pre)
n
Adjusted1MeanChange
(post-pre)
(95%ConfidenceInterval)
Consumptionofflavoredwaters210 -0.31 83 -0.19
-0.110.29
(containers/glasses/bottles/cans) (-0.32,0.10)Consumptionofplainwater(taporbottled) 215 0.04 84 0.15
-0.110.24
(containers/glasses/bottles/cans) (-0.30,0.08)Frequencyofdrinkingfromthewaterfountain(numberoftimes) 217 0.24 83 0.20
0.040.76
(-0.22,0.30)
Dietarybehaviors:General
Numberoftypesofunhealthydrinks2chosenatschoolcafeteria(outof5) 130 0.18 60 0.12
0.060.25
(-0.04,0.17)Numberoftypesofhealthydrinks3chosenatschoolcafeteria(outof5) 129 0.17 60 0.20
-0.030.76
(-0.25,0.18)Numberoftypesofunhealthydrinks2chosenwheneatingout(outof5) 219 0.05 84 0.05
0.001.00
(-0.21,0.20)Numberoftypesofhealthydrinks3chosenwheneatingout(outof5) 219 -0.25 84 -0.44
0.190.01
(0.05,0.34)Numberoftypesofunhealthydrinks2chosenwhenbringinglunchtoschool(outof5)
164 -0.11 70 -0.05-0.06
0.56(-0.27,0.14)
Numberoftypesofhealthydrinks3chosenwhenbringinglunchtoschool(outof5)
164 -0.12 70 0.01-0.13
0.17(-0.31,0.05)
Numberoftypesofunhealthydrinks2chosenat/broughttoschool(outof5)
212 0.13 81 0.120.01
0.89(-0.17,0.19)
Numberoftypesofhealthydrinks3chosenat/broughttoschool(outof5)
206 0.23 78 0.28-0.06
0.42(-0.19,0.08)
1Adjustedforbaseline,grade,gender,andrace/ethnicity.2Unhealthydrinksincluderegularsoda;dietsoda;fruitdrinks(not100%juice,notdiet);sweetenedcoffeeorteadrinks(notdiet);flavoredmilkormilkdrinks(hotchocolate,yogurtdrinks,smoothies).3Healthydrinksinclude100%fruitjuice;unsweetenedcoffeeorteadrinks;plainwhitemilkormilksubstitutes(soy,almond,ricemilk,etc.);bottledwater(plainorsparkling);tapwater.
11
StudentsexposedtotheRYDcurriculumreportedincreaseduseofnutrientlabelingofbeveragesascomparedtostudentsnotexposedtoit.Interventionstudentsreportedasmall,butstatisticallysignificantgreaterincreaseinthefrequencyofreadingtheNutritionFactsLabelwhenchoosingadrinkcomparedtocomparisongroupstudents(0.10;95%CI:0.03,0.17)(Table3).
Table3:ImpactofRethinkYourDrinkcurriculumonnutritionknowledgebehaviors,RethinkYourDrinkEvaluation,SacramentoandYoloCounties,2017.
InterventionGroup ComparisonGroup
Adjusted1Mean
DifferenceinChangeBetween
Interventionand
Comparison
p-value
n
Adjusted1MeanChange
(post-pre)
n
Adjusted1MeanChange
(post-pre)
(95%ConfidenceInterval)
FrequencyreadtheNutritionFactsLabel(4pointLikertscale2) 217 0.11 82 0.01
0.100.01
(0.03,0.17)FrequencyreadtheIngredientsList(4pointLikertscale2) 216 0.22 84 0.16
0.060.16
(-0.03,0.15)
AbilitytoreadNutritionFactsLabel 175 0.09 64 0.070.02
0.85(-0.20,0.25)
1Adjustedforbaseline,grade,gender,andrace/ethnicity.2All4pointscaleshavevaluesfromnever(1)-always(4).
12
TheRYDcurriculumhadlimitedeffectsonknowledgeassociatedwithself-efficacy.Interventionstudentsreportedasmallbutstatisticallysignificantgreaterincreaseintheirunderstandingofreasonsforchoosingcertainbeveragesascomparedtocomparisongroupstudents(0.19;95%CI:0.07,0.32)(Table4).
Table4:ImpactofRethinkYourDrinkcurriculumonnutritionknowledgeandself-efficacy,RethinkYourDrinkEvaluation,SacramentoandYoloCounties,2017.
InterventionGroup ComparisonGroup
Adjusted1Mean
DifferenceinChangeBetween
Interventionand
Comparison
p-value
n
Adjusted1MeanChange
(post-pre)
n
Adjusted1MeanChange
(post-pre)
(95%ConfidenceInterval)
Confidenceinabilitytoidentifyhealthybeverages 215 0.14 80 0.17
-0.030.62
(4-pointLikertscale2) (-0.16,0.10)Understandingofreasonsforchoosingcertainbeverages 215 0.29 82 0.10
0.19<0.01
(4-pointLikertscale3) (0.07,0.32)Confidenceinabilitytofindvalidhealthinformationaboutbeverages 214 0.27 81 0.38
-0.110.26
(4-pointLikertscale2) (-0.29,0.08)Understandingofdifferencebetweennaturalandaddedsugars 215 0.36 82 0.26
0.100.13
(4-pointLikertscale3) (-0.03,0.23)Numberofdrinkscorrectlyidentifiedascontainingsugar(outof4) 219 0.25 84 0.22
0.030.81
(-0.23,0.30)Numberofdrinkscorrectlyidentifiedascontainingaddedsugar(outof13) 219 -0.02 84 0.02
-0.040.78
(-0.35,0.26)Numberofingredientscorrectlyidentifiedasbeingtypesofaddedsugar(outof5)
219 0.38 84 0.070.31
0.10(-0.06,0.68)
Numberofhealthconditionscorrectlyidentifiedasresultofconsumingalotofsugar(outof5)
219 0.17 84 0.21-0.05
0.70(-0.28,0.19)
1Adjustedforbaseline,grade,gender,andrace/ethnicity.2Valuesfromnotatallconfident(1)–veryconfident(4).3Valuesfromnotatallwell(1)–verywell(4).
13
TheRYDcurriculumhadnosignificantimpactsonstudentattitudesregardingconsumptionofsugarandsugarydrinks(Table5).
Table5:ImpactofRethinkYourDrinkcurriculumonattitudesregardingconsumptionofsugarandsugarydrinks,RethinkYourDrinkEvaluation,SacramentoandYoloCounties,2017.
InterventionGroup ComparisonGroup
Adjusted1Mean
DifferenceinChangeBetween
Interventionand
Comparison
p-value
n
Adjusted1MeanChange
(post-pre)
n
Adjusted1MeanChange
(post-pre)
(95%ConfidenceInterval)
Agreementwithstatement:Iwouldliketodrinkfewersweeteneddrinks 198 0.06 74 -0.04
0.100.32
(5-pointLikertscale2) (-0.10,0.30)Agreementwithstatement:Consumingtoomuchsugarcanaffectmyhealth 215 0.04 80 0.03
0.010.91
(5-pointLikertscale2) (-0.13,0.15)1Adjustedforbaseline,grade,gender,andrace/ethnicity.2Valuesfromstronglydisagree(1)–stronglydisagree(5).
StudentsreceivingtheRYDcurriculumreportedchangesintheinfluenceoftwofactorsaffectingbeveragechoice.Theinterventionwasassociatedwithsmallbutsignificantdecreasesintheself-reportedamountofinfluenceofnumberofcaloriesinadrink(0.17;95%CI:0.11,0.23)aswellasbeverageadvertisements(0.18;95%CI:0.12,0.24)onbeveragechoice(Table6).
14
Table6:ImpactofRethinkYourDrinkcurriculumonfactorsinfluencingbeveragechoice,RethinkYourDrinkEvaluation,SacramentoandYoloCounties,2017.
InterventionGroup ComparisonGroup
Adjusted1Mean
DifferenceinChangeBetween
Interventionand
Comparison
p-value
n
Adjusted1MeanChange
(post-pre)
n
Adjusted1MeanChange
(post-pre)
(95%ConfidenceInterval)
Taste211 0.02 81 -0.01
0.030.39
(4-pointLikertscale2) (-0.04,0.10)Cost
209 0.20 81 0.170.03
0.67(4-pointLikertscale2) (-0.12,0.18)Whatfriendsdrink
210 0.20 79 0.190.02
0.80(4-pointLikertscale2) (-0.11,0.15)Whatfamilydrinks
211 0.13 80 0.070.07
0.38(4-pointLikertscale2) (-0.08,0.21)Amountofsugarinthedrink
208 0.19 80 0.090.10
0.10(4-pointLikertscale2) (-0.02,0.23)Numberofcaloriesinthedrink
210 0.01 80 -0.160.17
<0.01(4-pointLikertscale2) (0.11,0.23)Whetherthedrinkishealthy
210 0.11 81 0.010.09
0.34(4-pointLikertscale2) (-0.10,0.28)Adsforthedrink
210 0.15 80 -0.030.18
<0.01(4-pointLikertscale2) (0.12,0.24)Whetherthedrinkgivesenergy
209 0.51 80 0.400.11
0.14(4-pointLikertscale2) (-0.04,0.26)Whetherthedrinkhasvitamins,minerals,orprotein 210 0.11 80 -0.01
0.120.21
(4-pointLikertscale2) (-0.07,0.31)Whetherthedrinkhelpsconcentrate
207 0.25 80 0.38-0.13
0.17(4-pointLikertscale2) (-0.31,0.06)Whetherthedrinkhelpsstayhydrated
211 0.22 79 0.24-0.02
0.82(4-pointLikertscale2) (-0.21,0.17)
1Adjustedforbaseline,grade,gender,andrace/ethnicity.2Valuesfromalot(1)–notatall(4).
15
SynthesisoffeedbackfromteachersandstudentsregardingimplementationoftheRYDcurriculum
Theteachersurveyandinterviewsandstudentfocusgroupselicitedperceptionsofthecurriculumandrecommendationsforimprovements,includingthesekeyfindings:
Teachersfeltpositivelyaboutthecurriculum.Theteachersagreedwiththefollowingstatementsregardingeachofthelessons:“Thetrainingadequatelypreparedmetoteachthislesson,”“Ifeltadequatelypreparedtoteachthislesson,”and“TheContentStandardshelpedidentifythelesson’sfitwithgrade-levelinstructionrequirements.”Teachersbelievedthatthelessonswerewell-alignedwithlearningobjectives.Nearlyallteachersfeltthelessonswere“very”or“somewhat”well-alignedwiththelearningobjectivespresentedforeachlesson.Allteachersreportedthatthenutritioneducationcompetencieshelpedthemunderstandthelesson’sfitwithhealtheducationcontentstandards.Teachersdidnotimplementallcomponentsofthecurriculum.Duetolackoftimeand/orreluctancetoburdenstudentswithadditionalhomework,teachersconsistentlyreportedthattheydidnotincorporatethelastcomponentsofthecurriculum,includingthe“CoolDown,”“CheckforLearning”and“Extension/Links.”Futureversionsofthecurriculummaywishtoconsideromittingthosecomponents,particularlyconsideringthateventeachersreceivingastipendinthispilotstudydidnotimplementthem.Teachersandstudentsbelievethatthecurriculumwouldbemosteffectivewithyoungerstudents.SomestudentsfeltthattheRYDcurriculummightbemoresuitableformiddleorelementarystudents,notingthathighschoolstudentshaveingrainedhabitsthatmaybehardtobreak.Astudentexplainedthat,“wealreadyhave...habitsand...can'treallybreakthem.”SomestudentsalsoreportedlearningthesameinformationfoundintheRTYDcurriculuminmiddleschool.Astudentcommentedthat,“thelearningwaskindofrepetitivebecause...in[middleschool]HealthSciencethey...alreadyteachyouthis...soIstillrememberit.”Thatwascorroboratedbyateacher,whofeltthecurriculum“wouldbebetterforamiddleschoollevel,”notingthat“alotofstudentssaidtheyalreadylearnedthisinhealth[class].”Werethecurriculumobjectivesachieved?Studentsreportedbeneficialchangesinknowledge,includingawarenessofnutritionfactslabels.Focusgroupparticipantsreportedincreasedawarenessoftheimpactofsugarydrinks.Forexample,onesaidtheRYDcurriculumhelps“peoplerealizehowmuchsugar...affectsyourbody.”Studentscitedincreasedabilitytoreadnutritionfactslabelsandcalculatetheamountofsugarinbeverageswithonesaying,forexample,“Icanread…thenutritionlabeleasierandcalculatehowmuchsugarisin[abeverage].”
16
Increasedstudentknowledgewasnotalwaysassociatedwithbehaviorchange.Onefocusgroupparticipantsaid:“I'lllookatthenutritionlabel,butIjustlikefiguringouthowmuchsugarisinitforfun;I'llstilldrinkit.”(AsimilarphenomenonwasreportedbyJensenatal.,xwhofoundincreasedreadingofnutritionfactslabelswithnochangeintheuseoflabelingtochoosefooditems.)Behaviorchangeoccurred,butonalimitedscale.Asmallnumberoffocusgroupparticipantsreportedbehaviorchanges,includingdrinkinglowerfatmilkathome,drinkingmorewaterandchoosingsmallerportionsofsugarydrinks.Asmallnumberoffocusgroupstudentsalsoreportedaskingtheirparentstostopdrinkingsodaandtopreparehealthybeveragesfromtherecipecardsprovidedaspartofthecurriculum.TeacherinterviewsandstudentfocusgroupsprovidedspecificfeedbackoneachofthefourRethinkYourDrinklessonsLesson1A:“LearningtheFactsCards”and“LearningtheFactsBingo”Moststudentsandteacherspraisedthesocialcomponentandinteractivenatureofthislesson,butmanystudentswerealreadyfamiliarwiththeinformationitprovidedandfeltthe“LearningtheFacts”cards’contentcouldbeimprovedbyprovidingadditionalfactsaboutSSBs.Further,somestudentswereconcernedthattheinformationprovidedinLearningtheFactsBingosimplyrestatedfactsalreadypresentedbytheLearningtheFactsCards.While3ofthe4teachersinterviewedpraisedthefactthatstudentsgotoutoftheirseatsandmovedaroundfortheseactivities,oneteacherhadreservationsaboutmovementaroundacrowdedclassroom.Lesson1B:“HowMuchSugar”WhenassessingLesson1B,studentsandteachersfocusedonincreasesinknowledgeaboutthesugarcontentofvariousbeverages.TheyagreedthatthetactileandvisualaspectsofthislessonsuccessfullyreinforcedtheRYDmessage.StudentsfeltthisactivitywasimpactfulbecauseitallowedthemtovisuallyseeandfeeltheamountsofsugaractuallycontainedinSSBs.Forexample,onesaid:“Ilikeditwhenliketheyshowedtheactualsugarscubes.Thatactuallyhelpedmeseelikehowmuchsugarisactuallyinit.”Teachersalsoappreciatedthatstudentscould“touchandfeelsugarcubes.[The]kidswerelike‘Wow.’[It]hithomewiththem.”Lesson2A:“WhatAreMyInfluences”Thisactivity,designedtoidentifyandevaluateinfluencesthataffectfoodandbeveragechoices,waswell-receivedbybothstudentsandteachers.Asastudentexplained,“Ilikedthat[activity]...becauseitmadeusrealize...whatinfluencesus.”Teachersfeltstudentsfoundtheactivityengagingbecauseitallowedthemtodiscusstheirpersonallives.Ateacherexplainedthat“formanystudents,thisactivityisthefirsttimethattheywereaskedtoconnecthowthey
17
areinfluencedtohowtheseinfluencesaffecttheirchoices.Theyenjoyedtalkingabouttheirlifeandreasonswhytheychoosecertaindrinks.”Anothernotedthatstudents“reallygotintoitandtalkedaboutfamilyandhowtheymakecertainchoices…andunderstandandfeelthepressureswhenaroundotherfriends.”Lesson2B:“DecisionMakingProcess”(withconsiderationofLesson2A’s“AssessingMyDrinkOptions”homeworkassignment)and“ChooseaHealthyDrinkChallenge”Thegoalofthislessonwastoidentifyandevaluatevariedinfluencesonfoodandbeveragechoices.Studentandteacherresponsestoboth“DecisionMakingProcessandthe“ChooseaHealthyDrinkchallenge”weremixed.“Decision-MakingProcess,”inwhichstudentsconsideredresponsestothe“AssessingmyDrinkOptions”homeworkassignment,wasnotverywellreceivedbysomestudents.Theyfoundthedecision-makingprocessoverlycomplexwithrespecttowhattheyfeltwasarelativelystraightforwardchoicebetweenhealthyandunhealthybeverages.Teacherscorroboratedstudentdislikeofthisactivity,notingthatitfeltredundantwithotherlessons.Asoneteachernoted,“As11thand12graders(16-18[yearsold]),theywerepoliteaboutmyinstructions,butseemedabitbored.”Thiswasechoedbyanotherteacher,whofeltthat“itwaskindofaboringlesson.Lotsofmetalkingatthemandthenaworksheettheydidbythemselves.Thestudentswerenotasintoitastheotherlessons.”However,a9thgradeteachersaidthatstudentsfoundthisactivitychallenging,andrecommendedthathavingtwoorthreeconcretecompleteexamplesusingthestepsintheDecisionMakingModelwouldbeveryhelpful.”Anotherteacherrecommended“bringout[the]beveragelabelsagain.Bringoutimagesofvariousbeveragesandsay,‘Sowhichoneareyougoingtochoosenow?’.”Teachersalsofelttheinstructionsneedtoprovidemoreexplanationofterminology.Studentsandteachersalsoexpressedmixedopinionsaboutthe“ChooseaHealthyDrinkChallenge”activity.Studentssuggestedthattheactivityshouldincludesettingsbeyondtheschoolenvironment.Asoneexplained:“Weonlyhavelikethreedrinksatschool:chocolatemilk,milk,andwater,so…itwasabithardtoanswerthequestion,‘Which[drink]would[you]choose?’whenthere’s[notmuchtochoosefrom].”StudentsandteachersfeltthatLesson2Bcouldpotentiallybeeliminatedfromfutureversionsofthecurriculum.Asateacherexplained,“Iwouldn’tteach[Lesson2B]again….Itwasboringandfeltredundantforalotoftheinformationinthislesson.Ithinkbynowtheyhavelearnedwhataregoodandwhatarepoorbeveragechoices.”Teachersandstudentsprovidedseveralconcreterecommendationsforimprovingthecurriculum.Theseincluded:• Reducingthecurriculumtothreelessons(1A,1Band2A).
18
• Improvingflowbydesigningthecurriculumasasingleunittobetaughtoverseveralconsecutivedaysratherthanseveralweeks,allowingteacherstocontinueteachingincompleteactivitiesthefollowingday.
• Targetingyoungerstudentstopreventtheadoptionofunhealthyhabitsthatmaybecomeingrainedbyhighschool.
• IncludingPowerPointtypeslides(whichseveralteachershaddevelopedontheirown)tomakethecurriculummoreengagingforstudentsandeasierforteacherstoimpart.
• Providinghealthydrinksforstudentstosample,greateruseoftechnologyandonlineactivities,moregames,andmoreopportunitiesforsocialinteraction.
Studystrengthsandlimitations
Studystrengthsincludeapre-postdesignwithbothaninterventionandacomparisongroupandtheuseofmixedqualitativeandquantitativemethodstoelicitteacherandstudentfeedbacktoinformmodificationsoftheRYDcurriculum.TeachersandstudentsprovidedarangeofrecommendationsformodifyingtheRYDcurriculuminareasincludinglessonorganization,appropriatenessoflearninglevel,timeallocationandstudentengagement.Thisstudyalsohadseverallimitations.Interventionandcomparisongroupteachersreceivedastipendforparticipationintheresearch,whichmayhaveinfluencedcurriculumimplementationandmayhavealsoledtosocialdesirabilitybias,resultinginmorepositivesurveyresponsesthanmighthaveotherwisebeenthecase.Theprovisionofstipendsandthein-persontrainingoftheteachersmaylimitthegeneralizabilityofthefindings,giventhatisitnotlikelythatthesecomponentswouldbefeasibleshouldthecurriculumbeimplementedonalargerscale.Thelimitednumberofteacherswhowerewillingtoparticipatealsolimitedthegeneralizabilityoftheirexperiencewiththecurriculum.Limitationsofthefocusgroupsincludepossibleself-selectionbias.
ImplicationsforFutureEffortsThelimitedimpactoftheRYDcurriculumonthekeyoutcomesofinterest,i.e.studentintakeofsugarydrinksandhealthyalternativessuggeststhatthatthiscurricularapproachaloneisinsufficienttoachievebehaviorchange.ThisisconsistentwiththeSNAP-Edtheoryofchange,whichpositsthatacombinationofeducationalapproaches,policysystemsandenvironmentalchange,andsocialmarketingarerequiredtoachieveconsistentandenduringbehaviorchange.Furthermore,studentsandteachersalikenotedthatsomeofthecurriculumwasredundantwithlessonsreceivedinearliergradesandthatingeneralthismaterialismorelikelytohaveimpactwithyoungerstudents,whosehabitsmaybelessengrained.Severalsuggestionsweremadeforimprovingthelessons,eliminatinglesswell-receivedcomponents,andrestructuringandshorteningthecurriculumtoincreasefeasibilityandreceptivityonthepartofstudentsandteachers.Thesefindingssuggestthatthecurriculumshouldbe:1)revisedinaccordancewith
19
thesuggestedfeedbackdescribedinthereport;2)implementedwithcomplementaryPSEandsocialmarketingapproaches;and3)thatafterthesemodificationsaremadethecomprehensiveinterventionshouldbeevaluatedexactlyasitisintendedforlargescaledissemination,i.e.withoutcomponentssuchasstipendsandin-persontrainingwhicharenotfeasibleforwidespreadprogramimplementation.Furthermore,PSEapproachescouldbeevenmoreimpactfuliftheyweretoincludethebroadercommunitywherestudentslive.Thisistrueparticularlyinareaswhereschoolshavealreadyimplementedstrongsugarsweetenedbeverageschoolpolicieslimitingstudentacquisitionoftheseproducts.
20
REFERENCESCITED
iU.S.DepartmentofAgricultureandU.S.DepartmentofHealthandHumanServices.DietaryGuidelinesforAmericans,2010.7thEdition,Washington,DC:U.S.GovernmentPrintingOffice,December2010.iiKeihnerAJ,LinaresAM,RiderCD,SugermanS,MitchellPR,Hudes,M.Education,DietandEnvironmentalFactorsInfluenceSugar-SweetenedBeverageConsumptionAmongCaliforniaChildren,Teens,andAdults.Sacramento,CA:CaliforniaDepartmentofPublicHealth;2012.iiiBall,S.,Cohen,A.,&Meyer,M.(2012).Jumpintoaction.JournalofExtension[On-line],50(3),Article3FEA4.Availableat:http://www.joe.org/joe/2012june/a4.php.RetrievedJanuary16,2018.ivRider,C,Johnson-Arthur,C,Linares,A.(2015).RethinkYourDrink:YouthInterventionSuccessesandaCalltoAction.Posterpresentedatthe2015ChildhoodObesityConference,SanDiego,CA.NutritionPolicyInstitute,UniversityofCalifornia,DivisionofAgricultureandNaturalResources,Oakland,CA.vRider,C,Johnson-Arthur,C,Linares,A.(2015).RethinkYourDrink:YouthInterventionSuccessesandaCalltoAction.Posterpresentedatthe2015ChildhoodObesityConference,SanDiego,CA.NutritionPolicyInstitute,UniversityofCalifornia,DivisionofAgricultureandNaturalResources,Oakland,CA.viJensen,B.,Kattelman,K.,Ren,C.,&Wey,H.(2009).TheefficacyofKidQuest:anutritionandphysicalactivitycurriculumfor5thand6thgradeyouth.JournalofExtension[On-line],47(3),Article3FEA4.Availableat:https://www.joe.org/joe/2009june/a4.php.RetrievedJanuary16,2018.viiWikes,N.(2007).Theinfluenceofclassroomeducationonbeverageselectioninchildren.InMastersAbstractsInternational(Vol.46,No.04).RetrievedJanuary16,2018.viiihttps://www.cde.ca.gov/be/st/ss/documents/healthstandmar08.pdf.RetrievedJanuary23,2018.ixhttps://www.cde.ca.gov/ls/nu/he/documents/nergch1.pdf.RetrievedJanuary23,2018.xJensen,B.,Kattelman,K.,Ren,C.,&Wey,H.(2009).TheefficacyofKidQuest:anutritionandphysicalactivitycurriculumfor5thand6thgradeyouth.JournalofExtension[On-line],47(3),Article3FEA4.Availableat:https://www.joe.org/joe/2009june/a4.php.RetrievedJanuary16,2018.