Evaluating Web Pages. In MS, students learn to evaluate web sites for Relevancy and Appropriateness....

15
Evaluating Web Pages

Transcript of Evaluating Web Pages. In MS, students learn to evaluate web sites for Relevancy and Appropriateness....

Page 1: Evaluating Web Pages. In MS, students learn to evaluate web sites for Relevancy and Appropriateness. This is what the and the first in RADCAB stand for.

Evaluating Web Pages

Page 2: Evaluating Web Pages. In MS, students learn to evaluate web sites for Relevancy and Appropriateness. This is what the and the first in RADCAB stand for.

In MS, students learn to evaluate web sites for Relevancy and Appropriateness.

This is what the and the first in RADCAB stand for.

Page 3: Evaluating Web Pages. In MS, students learn to evaluate web sites for Relevancy and Appropriateness. This is what the and the first in RADCAB stand for.

Here are some of the questions we ask ourselves about the Relevancy and Appropriateness of web sites:

Should I be looking at this? If my Grandma walked in and saw this, what would she think?

Am I wasting my time looking at this?Does this have anything to do with what I’m

doing?Am I on the right track to find what I’m

looking for?Am I using the right search terms?

Page 4: Evaluating Web Pages. In MS, students learn to evaluate web sites for Relevancy and Appropriateness. This is what the and the first in RADCAB stand for.

“RADCAB” ™ A mnemonic acronym for information

evaluationCreated by Karen M. Christensson, M.S. Library

Media Education

“How much information do I need?” is a valuable question to ask early in the research process. The answer should help you determine where to look for information and when you can stop looking.

Check the information source for detail. Does the information source offer you the depth of coverage you need for your assignment?

Page 5: Evaluating Web Pages. In MS, students learn to evaluate web sites for Relevancy and Appropriateness. This is what the and the first in RADCAB stand for.

COVERAGE• There are specific details to look for in a

website that can help the researcher determine the site's usefulness. Using these details will help you evaluate a website for its quality of construction, content, and depth of coverage.

Page 6: Evaluating Web Pages. In MS, students learn to evaluate web sites for Relevancy and Appropriateness. This is what the and the first in RADCAB stand for.

How much information do I need?

Is this information really helpful, or is it “fluff”?

LOOK AT THE DETAILS!

Are there links to help me find out more information?

Is there a search feature?

Did the author cite sources?

Is the page easy-to-use, or confusing?

Page 7: Evaluating Web Pages. In MS, students learn to evaluate web sites for Relevancy and Appropriateness. This is what the and the first in RADCAB stand for.

“RADCAB” ™ A mnemonic acronym for information

evaluationCreated by Karen M. Christensson, M.S. Library

Media Education

What are the details? How are they useful?Site map Navigation and scope

Page organization: titles, headings, and subtitles

Navigation and evidence of quality construction

Works cited pages Credit to information sources used

External links Additional information sources

Internal search engine Quick information retrieval

Interactive, graphic elements Visual aids and interface interaction

Design appeal Easy and pleasant to use

Page 8: Evaluating Web Pages. In MS, students learn to evaluate web sites for Relevancy and Appropriateness. This is what the and the first in RADCAB stand for.

Both RADCAB and the Evaluating Methods for your unit use Currency as a criteria for judging web sites.

When was the page written or last updated?

How up to date are the links? Any “dead” links?

Is there newer, better information out there on my topic?

Do I want the newest “best” information available ?

Page 9: Evaluating Web Pages. In MS, students learn to evaluate web sites for Relevancy and Appropriateness. This is what the and the first in RADCAB stand for.

AND/OR

CCURACY• Are both important criteria with much in

common.

• Who wrote or published this page and can you contact him or her?

• Is the person qualified to write this document and are their qualifications listed?

• Is the information believable? Cross-check to make sure it is accurate.

Page 10: Evaluating Web Pages. In MS, students learn to evaluate web sites for Relevancy and Appropriateness. This is what the and the first in RADCAB stand for.

Why was this information written?

Is this written to try and sell me something? Convince me of something? Inform me of something?

Is this just a “fun” website? Is the author in favor or against my topic?

LOOK FOR CLUES!

Website name/website suffix

Advertising (if any)

Bias isn’t always bad…when you know it’s bias!

ORO

Page 11: Evaluating Web Pages. In MS, students learn to evaluate web sites for Relevancy and Appropriateness. This is what the and the first in RADCAB stand for.

Political Party websites: BIAS

http://www.gop.com/index.php

http://www.democrats.org/?nosplash=true

VERSUS

Page 12: Evaluating Web Pages. In MS, students learn to evaluate web sites for Relevancy and Appropriateness. This is what the and the first in RADCAB stand for.

Uniform Resource Locator• Com – commercial organization/business• Edu – College or University (SC.edu)• Org – non-profit organization (schools)• Gov – US Government or organization• Net – Network provider (Earthlink.net)• Mil – US Military (Army,Navy,Marines,etc)

• And many others!

Page 13: Evaluating Web Pages. In MS, students learn to evaluate web sites for Relevancy and Appropriateness. This is what the and the first in RADCAB stand for.

CREDITS

The following images were found on Google Images:

• Slide #1RADCAB Imagehttp://www.radcab.com/images/main/bottom.jpg

• Slide #2RADCAB Cabhttp://www.radcab.com/v2/images/taxi.gif

The following slides were borrowed from the RADCAB powerpoint found at http://www.greenwood52.org/1675206311336103/FileLib/browse.asp?A=374&BMDRN=2000&BCOB=0&C=55259

• Slides #10 & 11The following slides were developed using information found at

http://www.radcab.com/detail.html

• Slides #4 & 6

Page 14: Evaluating Web Pages. In MS, students learn to evaluate web sites for Relevancy and Appropriateness. This is what the and the first in RADCAB stand for.

Works Cited

Beck, Susan A. "The Good, the Bad and the Ugly, or, why it's a good idea to evaluate web resources." New Mexico State University Library Instruction Program. 09 Aug. 2007. New Mexico State University. 18 Jan 2008 <http://lib.nmsu.edu/instruction/eval.html>.

Christensson, Karen. "RADCAB- Your Vehicle for Information Evaluation." 22 Oct. 2007. RADCAB.com. 17 Jan. 2008 <http://www.radcab.com>.

Page 15: Evaluating Web Pages. In MS, students learn to evaluate web sites for Relevancy and Appropriateness. This is what the and the first in RADCAB stand for.

Works Cited (cont.)Christensson, Karen. "RADCAB- Your Vehicle for

Information Evaluation.(ppt.)" 17 Sep. 2008. RADCAB.com. 7 Jan. 2009 <http://www.greenwood52.org/1675206311336103/FileLib/browse.asp?A=374&BMDRN=2000&BCOB=0&C=55259>.

O'Neill, Ann B.. "Trash or Treasure? How to Evaluate Internet Resources." Information Literacy Skills used in BCPS Research Modules. 16 Oct. 2002. Baltimore County Public Library. 18 Jan. 2007 <http://www.bcpl.net/~sullivan/modules/tips/eval.html>.