EUV-initiated surface changes in polymerstransmission grating TG 5000 lines/mm (high resolution) and...

17
EUV-initiated surface changes in polymers A. Bartnik, H. Fiedorowicz, R. Jarocki, J. Kostecki, M. Szczurek Institute of Optoelectronics, Military University of Technology, Kaliskiego 2 ,00-908 Warsaw, Poland A. Biliński, O. Chernyayeva, J.W. Sobczak Institute of Physical Chemistry Polish Academy of Sciences, 44- 52 Kasprzaka Street, 01-224 Warsaw, Poland

Transcript of EUV-initiated surface changes in polymerstransmission grating TG 5000 lines/mm (high resolution) and...

  • EUV-initiated surface changes in polymers

    A. Bartnik, H. Fiedorowicz, R. Jarocki, J. Kostecki, M. Szczurek Institute of Optoelectronics, Military University of Technology,

    Kaliskiego 2 ,00-908 Warsaw, Poland

    A. Biliński, O. Chernyayeva, J.W. Sobczak Institute of Physical Chemistry Polish Academy of Sciences, 44-

    52 Kasprzaka Street, 01-224 Warsaw, Poland

  • Outline

    • motivations

    • laser - plasma EUV source for surface modification

    - the source description

    - EUV parameters

    • interaction with selected polymers

    - surface morphology - SEM measurements

    - chemical changes - XPS measurements

    • summary

  • Motivations

    • Surface processing- what for?

    Change of some surface properties: wettability, roughness, optical and adhesive properties, biocompatibility

    • How can be obtained?

    Changing surface morphology and chemical structure

    • Physical methods:

    plasma treatment, ion implantation, UV irradiation

    • Why EUV irradiation?

    Additional method, very small penetration depth, applicable for any polymer

  • EUV source for surface processing

    Laser-plasma EUV source,

    Gas-puff target,Low vacuum

    EUV collector,Efficient turbo pump,Differential pumping

    Chamber for irradiation,Options:•High vacuum for mass spectrometry,•Reactive gas under low pressure• possible use for micromachining

    EUVbeam

  • EUV source for surface processing

    View of the EUV source for surface modification

    Source section, low vacuum

    Schematic view of the double stream gas puff target

    Gas puff target area

    Gas valve

    Orifice for differential pumping

    lenslaser

    beam

    low-Z gas(hydrogen, helium)

    krypton

    outer nozzle inner nozzle

    LaserNd:YAG

    0.8 J, 4 ns, 10 Hz

  • Spectra of Xe, Kr, Kr+10%Xe EUV direct radiation measured using a spectrograph withtransmission grating TG 5000 lines/mm (high resolution) and 250 lines/mm (low resolution)

    EUV spectra of Kr, Kr+Xe, Xe plasmas

  • High resolution spectra of Xe, Kr, Kr+10%Xe EUV reflected from Au plated ellipsoidal collector,measured using a spectrograph with transmission grating TG 5000 lines/mm

    EUV spectra of Kr, Kr+Xe, Xe plasmas (reflected)

  • Low resolution spectra of Xe, Kr, Kr+10%Xe EUV reflected from Au plated ellipsoidal collector,measured using a spectrograph with 250 lines/mm transmission grating

    EUV spectra of Kr, Kr+Xe, Xe plasmas (reflected)

  • 2,0 1,5 1,0 0,5 0,0 0,5 1,0

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    fluen

    ce (

    mJ/

    cm2 )

    distance from axis (mm)

    Intensity distribution close to 10nm in the focal plane of the EUV collector

    Intensity distribution in the wide wavelength range in the focal plane of the EUV collector

    2 1 0 1 20

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    fluen

    ce (

    mJ/

    cm2 )

    distance (mm)

    EUV fluence in the focal plane for Kr plasma

  • Poly (methyl methacrylate) PMMA 5 EUV pulsesa)no further treatmentb)soaked in PMMA developer (methyl isobutyl ketone + isopropyl alcohol)

    Polyamide 6 (Nylon) 5 EUV pulsesa)no further treatmentb)soaked in isopropyl alcohol)

    EUV induced structures on PMMA and PA surfaces

    Two opposite processes are possible: crosslinking and fragmentation of polymer chains.

    Evidences of fragmentation shown here and in next slides

  • SEM images of the microstructures formed under EUV irradiation with the fluence close to maximum, well above the ablation threshold, followed by acetone rinsing

    Surface morphology of PET foil irradiated with different number of EUV pulses

    with further acetone treatment:

    a) 10 pulses,

    b) 25 pulses,

    without acetone treatment:

    c) 10 pulses

    d) 250 pulses

    The acetone rinsing removes the light fractions revealing the nanostructures having the form of grains with the size of the order of tens nanometers. The general form of surface microstructures remains unchanged.

    EUV induced structures on PET surface

  • Measurements of chemical changes

    500 1000 1500 2000

    0,0

    0,2

    0,4

    0,6

    0,8

    1,0

    1,2

    1,4

    1,6

    not - irradiated EUV - irradiated

    inte

    nsity

    (ar

    b. u

    nits

    )wave number (cm-1)

    •Raman scattering

    •Infrared spectroscopy

    •X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy

    500 1000 1500 2000

    EUV - irradiated not - irradiated

    inte

    nsity

    wavenumber (cm-1)

    Raman spectra Infrared spectraSignals come mainly from bulk with a very small contribution from the modified near surface layer. Hence the spectra before and afterirradiation are almost identical.

  • XPS spectra of PEN

    1400 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 00

    1x105

    2x105

    3x105

    4x105 b)a)

    C KL1

    O KL1

    C 1sO 1s

    C KL1

    O KL1C 1s

    O 1s

    inte

    nsity

    (ar

    b. u

    nits

    )

    binding energy (eV)

    1400 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 00

    1x1052x1053x1054x105

    binding energy (eV)

    inte

    nsity

    (ar

    b. u

    nits

    )

    290 288 286 284 2820

    1x1042x1043x1044x1045x104

    290 288 286 284 2820.0

    2.0x104

    4.0x104

    6.0x104

    C2

    C3

    C1

    c)

    a)

    d)

    b)

    inte

    nsity

    (arb

    . uni

    ts)

    binding energy (eV)536 534 532 530 528

    1x1042x1043x1044x1045x104

    O1O2

    int

    ensi

    ty (a

    rb. u

    nits

    )

    binding energy (eV)

    C1C

    2C

    3

    inte

    nsity

    (arb

    . uni

    ts)

    binding energy (eV)536 534 532 530 528

    1x104

    2x104

    3x104

    4x104

    O1O2

    inte

    nsity

    (arb

    . uni

    ts)

    binding energy (eV)

    • Concentration of C2 and C3remarkably decreased,• Concentration of oxygen decreased• O1/O2 ratio remained almost unchanged

    • Broadening of the peaks• Shift of maxima of the peaks

    oxygen is being removed as a whole O-C=O functional group

    each peak comes from more than one unique specie

  • XPS spectra of PET, PEN and PI

    • Carbon enrichment in the near surface layer in all cases

    • Concentration of O and N decreased

    Changes in ablation and surface modification

    thresholds

    polymer PET PEN PI

    component C1s O1s C1s O1s C1s O1s N1s

    non-treated 72,07 27,94 70,67 26,92 75,9 17,51 6,58

    irradiated 80,23 19,77 82,16 17,85 82,92 12,31 4,77

  • 40 30 20 10 0 -10

    PEN not-irradiated PEN EUV-irradiated

    inte

    nsity

    binding energy (eV)

    40 30 20 10 0 -10

    PI not-irradiated PI EUV-irradiated

    inte

    nsity

    binding energy (eV)

    30 20 10 0 -10

    -C=C-(benzene)

    O=C-O

    C-CC=OC-O

    PET not-irradiated

    inte

    nsity

    binding energy (eV)

    30 20 10 0 -10

    PET EUV-irradiated

    inte

    nsity

    binding energy (eV)

    PET – valence XPS

    not-irradiated

    EUVirradiated

    not-irradiated

    EUV rradiated

    not-irradiated

    EUV irradiated

    PEN – valence XPS

    PI – valence XPS

    XPS spectra of PET, PEN and PI

  • Conclusions

    • EUV source for surface modification was presented

    • Parameters of the EUV source were measured

    • morphology changes in selected polymers were presented

    • chemical changes were proved

    • results and interpretation of XPS measurements were presented

  • The research was partially performed in the frame of the EUREKA project E! 3892 ModPolEUV

    and under COST Action MP0601, funded by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education

    (decision Nr 120/EUR/2007/02)

    Acknowledgements