Etp Guideline (September 2015)
-
Upload
farahaffandy -
Category
Documents
-
view
214 -
download
0
Transcript of Etp Guideline (September 2015)
-
8/15/2019 Etp Guideline (September 2015)
1/39
ENGINEERING TEAM PROJECT (MCB 3053)
GUIDELINES
------
SEPTEMBER 2015
UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI PETRONAS 31750 Bandar Seri Iskandar, Perak Darul Ridzuan, Malaysia.
-
8/15/2019 Etp Guideline (September 2015)
2/39
E n g i n e e r i n g T e a m P r o j e c t ( E T P ) : S e p t e m b e r 2 0 1 5 S e m e s t e r Page 2
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Contents Page
_______________________________________________________________________
1. INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . 4
2. OBJECTIVES AND LEARNING OUTCOMES . . . 4
3. SCOPE OF PROJECT . . . . . . 5
4. SUMMARY OF PROJECT WORK . . . . . 5
4.1 Project Proposal . . . . . . 5
4.2 Progress Report . . . . . . 6
4.3 Development of Prototype / Model . . . . 6
4.4 Poster Presentation . . . . . . 6
4.5 Demonstration of Working Prototype / Model . . . 6
4.6 Engineering Design Exhibition (SEDEX) . . 7
4.7 Oral Presentation . . . . . . 7
4.8 Final Report . . . . . . . 7
5. ETP COORDINATORS . . . . . . 8
6. SUPERVISORS . . . . . . . 8
6.1 Supervisor 1 . . . . . . . 8
6.2 Supervisor 2 . . . . . . . 8
7. ETP ANNOUNCEMENTS . . . . . . 8
8. ATTENDANCE AND MEETINGS . . . . . 9
9. EVALUATION . . . . . . . 9
10. PROJECT EXPENDITURE . . . . . 9
11. LABORATORY . . . . . . . 13
12. PLAGIARISM . . . . . . . 13
13. WRITING FORMAT FOR FINAL REPORT . . . 13
-
8/15/2019 Etp Guideline (September 2015)
3/39
E n g i n e e r i n g T e a m P r o j e c t ( E T P ) : S e p t e m b e r 2 0 1 5 S e m e s t e r Page 3
14. APPENDICES . . . . . . . 18
APPENDICES:
Page
APPENDIX I IMPORTANTDATES 18 ..................................................................................................................
APPENDIX II PROJECT ASSESSMENT RUBRIC....................................................19
APPENDIX III PROJECT PROPOSAL SCORE SHEET ............................................ 21
APPENDIX IV PROGRESS REPORT SCORE SHEET .............................................. 22
APPENDIX V FABRICATION SCORE SHEET ......................................................... 23
APPENDIX VI POSTER EVALUATION SHEET ........................................................ 24
APPENDIX VII DEMO. OF WORKING PROTOTYPE/MODEL ............................... 25
APPENDIX VIII ORAL PRESENTATION: GROUP ASSESSMENT ......................... 26
APPENDIX IX FINAL REPORT SCORE SHEET ....................................................... 27
APPENDIX X CALCULATION OF INDIVIDUAL CONTRIBUTION (IC) ............ 28
APPENDIX XI RESULTCOMPILATION 29 ..................................................................................................................
APPENDIX XII LOGBOOK SUMMARY ....................................................................... 30
APPENDIX XIII PROJECT PROPOSAL CONTENT .................................................... 31
APPENDIX XIV SAMPLE OF REFERENCING FORMAT .......................................... 32
APPENDIX XV SAMPLE OF COVER PAGE FOR FINAL REPORT ....................... 33
APPENDIX XVI STUDENTS’ REQUISITION FORM. .................................................. 34
APPENDIX XVII STUDENTS’ REQUISITION FORM – SAMPLE .............................. 35
APPENDIX XVIII JUSTIFICATION LETTER .................................................................. 36
APPENDIX XIX JUSTIFICATION LETTER – SAMPLE ............................................. 37
APPENDIX XX ETP CLAIM BREAKDOWN FORM ................................................... 38
APPENDIX XXI PEER EVALUATION TEMPLATE ................................................... 39
-
8/15/2019 Etp Guideline (September 2015)
4/39
E n g i n e e r i n g T e a m P r o j e c t ( E T P ) : S e p t e m b e r 2 0 1 5 S e m e s t e r Page 4
1. INTRODUCTION
This course is offered to the 3rd year engineering students. The subject is designed to ensure
that students will acquire the knowledge in conducting research and development by
working in a team. This includes conducting literature research, preparing project proposal,
performing preliminary design concepts, simulation, and evaluation for the best concept
and designing the selected concept.
Students will be divided into groups that consist of five to six members of variousdisciplines namely Mechanical, Electrical & Electronics, Chemical, Civil and Petroleum
Engineering. Please note that in view of the dissimilar number of students registering for
this module from each engineering program, there are groups that may not have studentsfrom all five engineering disciplines. One or two supervisors will be assigned to each
group.
2. OBJECTIVES AND LEARNING OUTCOMES
The objectives of the Engineering Team Project (ETP) course are as follows:
To inculcate teamwork spirit.
To develop leadership skills as well as technical competency in:o delegation of various taskso analysing engineering problemso performing engineering designo enhancing software related skills
To broaden the knowledge on commercially available off-the-shelf equipment aswell as industrial equipment.
To develop knowledge in integrating components into a comprehensive workingsystem.
To provide a platform for advanced design courses.
To nurture creativity, innovativeness, and business acumen.
To provide exposure on project management skills
The course outcomes are; at the end of this course, students should be able to:
1. Apply engineering knowledge and solve engineering design problem.2. Work in a multi-disciplinary team-based project work.3. Apply the principle of project management.
4. Apply proper design process to produce creative and innovative solution.5. Demonstrate effective communication, report writing, presentation and
entrepreneur skills.
Note: These are NOT the objectives of the project work you are worki ng on.
-
8/15/2019 Etp Guideline (September 2015)
5/39
E n g i n e e r i n g T e a m P r o j e c t ( E T P ) : S e p t e m b e r 2 0 1 5 S e m e s t e r Page 5
3. SCOPE OF PROJECT
The scope of the project includes:
To generate conceptual designs
To perform necessary engineering calculations To generate engineering drawings of the selected concept
To develop a working model or prototype
The final result of the project shall be exhibited in the form of engineering drawings,reports, and a WORKING MODEL or PROTOTYPE. The conceptual design should
incorporate as many as possible elements or components of Electrical / Electronic /
Mechanical / Chemical / Civil / Petroleum engineering. The approach to solutions and
methodologies such as selection of materials, problem analysis etc., shall be based onfundamental engineering calculations. The feasibility and suitability of a project to be taken
as an ETP project are assessed by using the Project Assessment Rubric in Appendix II.
4. SUMMARY OF PROJECT WORK
Please refer to Appendix I for the schedule of the present semester.
4.1 Project Proposal
Each group shall discuss among members to come out with a suitable and feasible projectand more importantly within the time frame as specified in Appendix I. When an
agreement has been reached among the team members and also the supervisor, a project
proposal must be submitted for assessment. Prior to submission, the project proposal must be discussed with the respective supervisors to determine the scope, problems, and
practicality of the proposed project. The content of the proposal must be based on the
format in Appendix XIII. The report shall not exceed 12 pages including the appendices.
Each group must submit the project proposal to the supervisor by the due date specified in
Appendix I. The proposal will be assessed based on the marking scheme in Appendix III.
Note: Supervisors need to ensure that any draft proposal be reviewed and returned promptl y to
ensure that students are able to submi t their work on time.
-
8/15/2019 Etp Guideline (September 2015)
6/39
E n g i n e e r i n g T e a m P r o j e c t ( E T P ) : S e p t e m b e r 2 0 1 5 S e m e s t e r Page 6
4.2 Progress Report
A progress report must be submitted to the supervisor by the due date specified inAppendix I. The report will be graded based on the marking scheme in Appendix IV. Thereport, which shall not exceed 12 pages including the appendices, shall comprise:
details of the activities that need to be carried out
identification of potential problems
a few conceptual designs that have been considered
necessary preliminary engineering calculations, data collection and benefit-costanalysis that have been used in deciding the final design.
4.3 Development of Prototype / Model
Throughout the project, the supervisor will monitor the overall progress and development
of the project through meetings and logbooks as well as progress report. The prototype ormodel of the project must be completed by the date specified in Appendix I. Upon
completion, the group must make an arrangement with the supervisor for assessment of the
prototype or model. The assessment will generally be based on the planning, execution andthe quality of the prototype or model. Please refer to the format in Appendix V for the
guidelines of the assessment.
4.4 Poster Presentation
Each group will be required to present their results and findings in the form of ONE A-1
size poster with a portrait-layout. The poster presentation provides an opportunity for
students to expose or share their work, knowledge and experience with other students and
also with lecturers. The poster from each group will be examined, unmanned, by one ormore examiners in a session that will be advised further. Appendix VI provides the
guidelines on the poster exhibition assessment criteria. The tentative time for the sessionis indicated in Appendix I. The use of more than one poster will be penalised.
Selected posters will be exhibited in the Engineering Design Exhibition (SEDEX), whichis described in Section 4.6. The selection will be made based on the scores given by the
examiners for the posters and the demonstration/simulation of the working
prototype/model.
4.5 Demonstration / Simulation of Working Prototype/Model
All groups are also required to demonstrate or simulate a working prototype or model oftheir project before one or more examiners (non-supervisor). An actual model
demonstration is preferable, however, in certain cases, a computer simulation might be
acceptable depending on the nature of the project. This demonstration/simulation will beassessed based on the criteria specified in Appendix VII.
The scores for the demonstration/simulation, together with the poster, will be used by the
ETP Coordinators in selecting groups that will participate in the SEDEX.
-
8/15/2019 Etp Guideline (September 2015)
7/39
E n g i n e e r i n g T e a m P r o j e c t ( E T P ) : S e p t e m b e r 2 0 1 5 S e m e s t e r Page 7
4.6 Science & Engineering Design Exhibition (SEDEX)
The Science & Engineering Design Exhibition (SEDEX) is an event organized by the
university towards the end of every semester. It provides opportunities for students to
present their project works, mainly through the ETP and Final Year Project (FYP) courses.
Only selected projects will be allowed invited to participate. For ETP, selection will
generally be made based on the score obtained by groups in the evaluations for posters anddemonstrations.
All participants will be given certificates, and in addition winners will be awarded. Projects
with certain outstanding quality and innovation will be selected to represent the university
at national and international level competitions. It must be noted that the operationalmatters of the SEDEX is beyond the responsibility of ETP supervisors and coordinators.
There shall also be no extra marks for groups that participate or win awards in the SEDEX.
Certificates, awards and details of the SEDEX should be obtained only from the SEDEX
Committee.
4.7 Oral Presentation
During the demonstration session, students shall deliver a presentation on their findingsusing own laptop. Assessment on visual aspects, clarity of presentation, logic, knowledge
of subject matter and the overall content of the presentation will be made on a group basis
(Appendix VIII). Each group member must present some portion of the materials. Eachgroup will be allocated 10 minutes for the presentation, and another 5 minutes for a
question and answer session. The examiners will be the appointed lecturers, other than the
group supervisor.
4.8 Final Report
Each group shall submit a final report by the due date specified in Appendix I. The reportwill be assessed using the form in Appendix IX. In this report, the ultimate results and
findings of the project shall be presented. The report shall be assessed based on:
Critical review of current problems/solutions
Literature review
Development of alternatives and options
Decision making processes
Final Design (engineering drawing)
Technical/Scientific aspects/support
Business and economic considerations
Application/Viability of selected design Suggestion for area of improvements
Recommendations for future work
Please note that the report must be limited to thirty (30) pages excluding appendices,
figures and drawings.
-
8/15/2019 Etp Guideline (September 2015)
8/39
E n g i n e e r i n g T e a m P r o j e c t ( E T P ) : S e p t e m b e r 2 0 1 5 S e m e s t e r Page 8
5. COORDINATORS
The following lecturers are appointed by the Head of the Mechanical Engineering
Programme as the ETP Coordinators.
1. Dr Hilmi Hussin (05 368 7027, [email protected])2. Dr Setyamartana Parman (05 368 7197, [email protected])3. Dr Mazli Mustapha (05 368 7208, [email protected])
The responsibilities of the Coordinators can be summarised as follows:
Managing and implementing the ETP course.
Assigning student groups and supervisors.
Advising supervisors on the project assessment or any other problemsencountered during the project work.
Assigning examiners and coordinate seminar presentation and poster exhibition.
Facilitate expenditure claims. Compiling students’ results.
6. SUPERVISORS
6.1 Supervisor 1
Evaluating the project proposal, progress report, fabrication and final report basedon the rubric provided on timely basis.
Advising students on the preparation of their design projects, including but notlimited to the technical, economical and management aspects.
Monitoring of student's progress against Gantt chart through their weekly progressreports.
Certifying students’ expenditure claims.
Obtaining claims and disbursement to students.
Assigning IC score to individual student appropriately.
6.2 Supervisor 2 or Co-Supervisor
A Supervisor 2 may be nominated to assist in the supervision of a team. The responsibilities
of the Supervisor 2 are:
Where applicable, guiding students or providing support in any specific areasincluding but not limited to soft skills, language, report writing, business acumen,
etc., as and when necessary within the project time frame.
Representing Supervisor 1 in executing the tasks stipulated in Clause 6.1 under thecircumstances whereby Supervisor 1 is not able to perform the task(s).
-
8/15/2019 Etp Guideline (September 2015)
9/39
E n g i n e e r i n g T e a m P r o j e c t ( E T P ) : S e p t e m b e r 2 0 1 5 S e m e s t e r Page 9
7. ANNOUNCEMENTS
All announcements regarding ETP will be made through e-Learning or posters at strategic
locations (e.g. Pocket C and Pocket D). Students MUST regularly visit these sites to keep
themselves updated and informed of all important dates and announcements.
8. ATTENDANCE AND MEETINGS
Students are required to conduct meetings regularly among themselves on project
implementation. In addition, all groups are required to arrange weekly meetings with the
supervisor. The attendance of group members will be recorded. The logbook, theattendance record as well as students active participation will be monitored to calculate for
Individual Contribution (IC) (see Section 9. EVALUATION).
Each student must forward logbooks individually to the supervisor during weeklymeetings. The verified logbook shall be returned at the end of the meeting. Each student
shall bring the compilation of the logbooks to the weekly meeting.
9. EVALUATION
Students will be evaluated based on their capability in undertaking the project, producing
the written report and presenting the result. The main components of evaluation are givenin Table 1. In general, the evaluation of the group will be carried out by supervisors
(55 %), appointed examiners (40 %), and peer evaluation (5 %), with a total of 100 %. The
evaluation forms for each component are given in the Appendices.
The individual score for Individual Contribution (IC) (see Appendix X) described in
Section 8. ATTENDANCE AND MEETINGS, and peer evaluation (Appendix XXI)will be used to differentiate the individual score for each student in a group. Each studentwill also be evaluated based on prescribed criteria by other members of the team, by means
of peer evaluation. Instructions on peer evaluation will be provided approximately in the
last 3 weeks of the semester.
10. PROJECT EXPENDITURE
In building the prototype or model, each group may request project fund of up to RM 200
to purchase approved components or materials that are not available in laboratories at UTP.
Figure 1 shows the ETP Purchase Requisition Flow Chart that students need to follow in
order to purchase project materials, in which failure to comply with this procedure mayresult in non-payment of the claims. Table 2 provides further explanation to the process
flow chart.
-
8/15/2019 Etp Guideline (September 2015)
10/39
E n g i n e e r i n g T e a m P r o j e c t ( E T P ) : S e p t e m b e r 2 0 1 5 S e m e s t e r Page 10
Table 1: ETP Grading Structure.
Tentative ComponentsAssessment Contribution
Evaluation
Time Supervisor Panel of
Examiners
Peer
Evaluation
Forms
W 3 Project Proposal10 %
Appendix III
W 7 Progress Report10 %
Appendix IV
W 10Fabrication of Prototype or
Model10 % Appendix V
W 11 Poster Evaluation 10 % Appendix VI
W 11Demonstration of Prototype or
Model20% Appendix VII
W 11 Group Oral Presentation 10 % Appendix VIII
W 14 Peer Evaluation 5 % Appendix XXI
W 14 Final Report 15% Appendix IX
Continuous
Individual Contribution
(Logbook & Meeting, Active
Participation)
10% Appendix X
Total 55 % 40 % 5 %
-
8/15/2019 Etp Guideline (September 2015)
11/39
E n g i n e e r i n g T e a m P r o j e c t ( E T P ) : S e p t e m b e r 2 0 1 5 S e m e s t e r Page 11
Figure 1: Purchase Requisition Flow Chart
6. Submit ETP Claim Breakdown Form and receipts
(hardcopies and softcopies) to ETP Coordinator
7. Collect claims from SV
End
Star t
5. - Arrange original receipts according to sequence in FORM 03- Paste original receipts on A4 papers
(Students are strongly advised to make copy of all receipts)
- Fill up ETP Claim Breakdown Form (App XX)
4. Purchase items
1. - Fill up FORM 03 (App XVI)
- Obtain verification from Lab Executive
Amount
exceed
RM200?
2. Prepare justification letter (App XVIII)
Note: 1. Submission of FORM 03 does not guarantee approval.
2. All deadlines stated are to be complied strictly. Late submissions will not be entertained.
Y
Legend
SV Supervisor
3. - Obtain signature from SV for FORM 03 and justification letter
(if exceed RM200)
- Submit FORM 03 and justification letter to coordinator
Deadline: 15 Nov 2013
N
-
8/15/2019 Etp Guideline (September 2015)
12/39
E n g i n e e r i n g T e a m P r o j e c t ( E T P ) : S e p t e m b e r 2 0 1 5 S e m e s t e r Page 12
Table 2: Explanation to Purchase Requisition Flow Chart.
FlowChartItem #
Description Remarks
1- Fill up FORM 03 (App XVI)- Obtain verification from Lab Executive
- Fill up FORM 03 completely. Refer sample, App XVII. - Obtain verification from Lab Executive on availability ofthe items in UTP.
2- Obtain signature from SV for FORM 03
and justification letter (if exceed RM200)- Prepare justification letter (App XVIII)
- Justification letter is applicable for purchase exceedingRM200. Refer sample, App XIX.
3- Submit FORM 03 and justification letter to
Coordinator (make copy for future reference)
- Incomplete or inaccurate information will result in delay ornon-approval.- Late submissions will not be entertained.
4 Purchase items
- Items purchased must be according to FORM 03 submitted.- If additional items are required, a new FORM 03 must be
submitted to the coordinator.- Claims of additional items not listed in the first FORM 03
will be honoured based on the discretion of coordinator.- Purchases are made using students' own money in advance.
5
- Arrange original receipts according tosequence in FORM 03
- Paste original receipts on A4 papers(Students are strongly advised to make copyof all receipts)- Fill up ETP Claim Breakdown Form(App XX)
- Receipts should be arranged according to sequence inFORM 03.
- All original receipts are to be pasted on A4 papers.- Copies of receipts are to be retained by students.- Fill up App XX completely, including Receipt No. for all
items.
6Submit ETP Claim Breakdown Form andreceipts to Coordinator in both softcopy and
hardcopy forms.
- Late submissions will not be entertained.- Please e-mail the softcopy version as well.
7 Collect claims from SV- Students are responsible to follow up with SV on payment.Please allow some time for payment to reach SV.
-
8/15/2019 Etp Guideline (September 2015)
13/39
E n g i n e e r i n g T e a m P r o j e c t ( E T P ) : S e p t e m b e r 2 0 1 5 S e m e s t e r Page 13
11. LABORATORY
Students are allowed to use the laboratory for the purposes of experiments or fabrications
of their model or prototype. The technicians who are in-charged for the laboratory related
to this course are responsible in co-ordinating the lab operations, which include the Health,
Safety and Environment (HSE) aspects, scheduling of equipment, checking and providing
consumables. Students are required to notify the technicians on their intent to use the labin advance. All lab regulations must be complied. Lab coats and proper attire shall be worn
in the lab. Each group must carry out housekeeping and the technicians will monitor this.Failure to comply with the regulations may result in deduction of marks by the
Coordinators.
12. PLAGIARISM
Plagiarism is strictly prohibited and is a serious offence. Kindly refer to Section 5.1 of the
UTP’s undergraduate handbook, A Guide to University Academic Policies and Procedures.Any work that is found to have been copied or plagiarized will NOT be assessed.
13. WRITING FORMAT FOR FINAL REPORT
The writing format of the ETP final report should follow the UTP standard as described
below. The report consists of many parts arranged in a certain order. It is recommendedthat the contents be in the following order, although not every report will include all the
items listed.
a) Title b) Acknowledgementc) Executive Summary / Abstract
d) Table of Contentse) Background of Project Workf) Identification and Definition of Problemg) Objective and Scopeh) Project Managementi) Literature Review j) Theoryk) Procedure / Methodologyl) Engineering Analysism) Business / Economic Analysisn) Discussion of Results
o) Conclusion p) Recommendationq) Referencesr) Appendices
-
8/15/2019 Etp Guideline (September 2015)
14/39
E n g i n e e r i n g T e a m P r o j e c t ( E T P ) : S e p t e m b e r 2 0 1 5 S e m e s t e r Page 14
General Writing Format
Students must follow specific guidelines for writing the report as stated below.
a) Language
The report must be written in English Language.
b) Font and Spacing
All text should be double-spaced (Times New Roman regular font-style, size 12)
written on one side of each white A4 paper. However, foot note, computer programcodes (must be reduced to font size 8), and captions for tables and figures should
be single-spaced.
c) Length
The report shall not be more than 30 pages, excluding the appendices. Students are
encouraged to be brief and concise in their writing and avoid jargon and passivevoice as much as possible.
d) Numbering
All pages must be numbered in proper sequence from introduction to the end of thereport including pages on figures, tables, computer programs and appendices. Page
numbers appear by themselves and are not to be enclosed in parenthesis, hyphens
or other decorative symbols. Page number must be positioned at the bottom and
centred.
e) Margin
The top, bottom and right margins are 25 mm. The left margin must be 40 mm.
f) Mathematical Text
Mathematical text must be spaced out, superscript and subscript must be clearly
shown as such.
g) Heading
Major headings, such as INTRODUCTION, should be in capitals. Times NewRoman and font size 14 should be used. Secondary headings such as Example, the
first letter should be capitalised, bold and font size 12 should be used, and tertiary
heading should be in Times New Roman.
-
8/15/2019 Etp Guideline (September 2015)
15/39
E n g i n e e r i n g T e a m P r o j e c t ( E T P ) : S e p t e m b e r 2 0 1 5 S e m e s t e r Page 15
h) Tables and Figures
Tables and figures less than a page in size should be inserted into the text near the
point of reference with a three-line space above and below. Tables should be
continuous and not carried over to the succeeding page. Margins’ limits are the
same as text full-page. All tables and figures should be numbered consecutively.
Tables and figures are must be within the main text. Table captions should be positioned at the top middle of each table. The captions for figures should be
positioned at the bottom middle of each figure.
i) References
The method of writing references must follow the standard format. See
Appendix XIV for samples of reference format.
j) Title Page
The title page should be set out in accordance with the Appendix XV and should
include the followings:- name of the group members in FULL complete with the Matrix Number.
- title of the ETP project
- month and year in which the ETP final report is submitted
Students must submit one copy of their ETP final report to the respective supervisor
on week 14.
General Content
This section will elaborate more about the general content needed in each part of the report
format.
a) Title
The project title should reflect the focus on core issues of the research work.
b) Acknowledgements
Acknowledgements should include the names of the contributors to the projectwork including the supervisors and members of the group, preferably not more than
one page.
-
8/15/2019 Etp Guideline (September 2015)
16/39
E n g i n e e r i n g T e a m P r o j e c t ( E T P ) : S e p t e m b e r 2 0 1 5 S e m e s t e r Page 16
c) Summary / Abstract
The summary or abstract briefly covers the content of the work. It should contain
the (i) Objectives of the project; i.e., state the core issue, research question or
objective of the design work, (ii) Methodology; i.e., briefly describe the methods
or techniques used in achieving the objectives, (iii) Results; i.e., describe the results
obtained from the methodology employed, and (iv) Conclusions; i.e., interpretationof the results in relation to the theory or hypotheses. Draw conclusions and state
the implications. The summary or abstract is presented so that any other reader,who is attracted by the title of the project, can know a little more without having to
read the whole report. Any reference to the literature is not made in the abstract but
if such references are necessary, they should be footnoted. Abstract should not bemore than one page.
d) Table of Contents
Table of contents lists all headings and sub-headings, tables, figures, appendices,
bibliography with the page numbers.
e) Background of Project Work
The background covers the research project, the definition of the problem, the
achievement expected from the project, the importance of the project as well as therange and depth of the study.
f) Objective and Scope
The aim of the study includes main/general matter that needs to be achieved orimplemented. Objectives are more detailed and closely related to aim. Scope is the boundary for the research work planned by the students to ensure the feasibility of
the project to be carried out within the given time frame.
g) Project Management
Project management should focus on progress monitoring and task allocation withthe usage of Gantt chart.
h) Literature Review
Literature review includes the review of written materials on the topic and area
chosen. It gives the background of the current studies of the problem area chosen
from various written sources of references. This section reviews the previous
research analytically, critically and objectively.
-
8/15/2019 Etp Guideline (September 2015)
17/39
E n g i n e e r i n g T e a m P r o j e c t ( E T P ) : S e p t e m b e r 2 0 1 5 S e m e s t e r Page 17
i) Theory, Methodology and Procedure
This section shall contain all the relevant theories, hypotheses, facts and data
obtained from references and literature reviews. The theories included must be
relevant with the objectives and the findings of the project, thus allowing the
comparison between the results achieved and the theory to be outstanding. The
methodology must be relevant and used in the project.
j) Engineering Analysis
This section should include data gathering, data analysis, tools required, possible
solutions to problems, decision making on the selected solution and project benefits.
k) Discussion on Result and Findings
This section presents the finding or outcome of the research work. It is suggested
that the results obtained be presented clearly in the form of tables and figures suchas graphs, diagrams or others.
l) Conclusions
Conclusion highlights whether the work completed complies with the set objectiveand the significance of the findings. Recommendation for future work should be
stated in this section to ensure the set objective can be achieved and improved or
even expanded.
m) References
This section is to record all references used for preparing the proposed project. Usethe standard format as given in the appendix.
n) Appendices
Lengthy calculations, figures, raw data, computer programs/source codes, outputs,
etc. are to be enclosed as appendices. They should be titled and numbered accordingto chronological order. Each appendix is preferably named using capital letters and
the appendices need to be listed down in the Table of Contents.
-
8/15/2019 Etp Guideline (September 2015)
18/39
E n g i n e e r i n g T e a m P r o j e c t ( E T P ) : S e p t e m b e r 2 0 1 5 S e m e s t e r Page 18
APPENDIX I: IMPORTANT DATES
Week Number
Activities 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
Seminar I (ETP Briefing) 23/9
Seminar II 30/9
Seminar III 7/10
Project proposal due 13/10
Lab Safety Briefing 14/10
Seminar IV 21/10
Progress Report due 4/11
Submission of Form 03 11/11
Evaluation on Fabrication 25/10
Poster & Product Demo &Presentation assessment(PRESEDEX)
3/12
SEDEX(May & Sep semesters only)
9/12
Submission of ClaimBreakdown form & Receipts
16/12
Submission of PeerEvaluation Form
23/12
Submission of Final Report 23/12
* By co-ordinator: List of students, groups, supervisors and topics
Note: The above schedule is subjected to change. Please check messages in the e-learning regularly for updates.
-
8/15/2019 Etp Guideline (September 2015)
19/39
APPENDIX II: PROJECT ASSESSMENT RUBRIC
ETP Group: _______________________________ Project Title: _______________________________
Purpose: The assessment aims to measure the feasibility and suitability of a project to be taken as an ETP project.
Instruction: 1. Assign the appropriate score to each criteria, according to the most fitting description provided.
2. Sum up the total scores for all criteria in the last column.
3. Refer to the score indication table.
Criteria / Score 4 3 2 1 Sc
1. Opportunity for teamwork
development
[to assess suitability of project as
means to inculcate teamwork]
Supports development ofteamwork
Reflects interdependenceand balanced participation
Every member’s role isdefined and understoodby all.
Reasonable opportunityfor development ofteamwork andbalanced participation
Tasks are defined butnot all membersunderstand them
Not much opportunity forteamwork developmentas the tasks are highlysegmented andindependent of eachother
No opportunity forteamwork development
2. Level of technical competence
and capability of the team vis-
à-vis project’s requirement
(such as specialized
knowledge or skill)
The team possesses thenecessary technicalcapability to accomplishthe tasks
The team possessesthe necessary technicalcapability to accomplishthe tasks, however,some additional study
or guidance may beneeded
The team lacks thetechnical capability toaccomplish the tasks andrequires substantialguidance by supervisor
and extensive study
The team does not havethe technical capability toaccomplish the tasks
3. Availability of equipment
required
All equipment required areavailable in UTP
Most of the equipmentare available in UTP
Most of the equipmentrequired are NOTavailable in UTP
All equipment requiredare NOT available in UTP
4. Opportunity to incorporate
creativity, innovativeness andbusiness acumen
High opportunity Moderate opportunity Little opportunity No opportunity
-
8/15/2019 Etp Guideline (September 2015)
20/39
E n g i n e e r i n g T e a m P r o j e c t ( E T P ) : S e p t e m b e r 2 0 1 5 S e m e s t e r Page 20
Criteria / Score 4 3 2 1 Sc
5. Risk in operational safety (e.g.
laser cutting)
Minimal risk Low risk Moderate risk. Mayrequire trained personnel
High risk. Only authorizedand trained personnel(technicians) allowed tooperate / handle projectequipment or materials.
6. Project involves hazardous
materials (e.g. arsenic)
None at all A small amount of
hazardous material,within the capability ofthe labs at UTP
Moderate amount of
hazardous material
Large amount of
hazardous material
7. Time required for project
completion
Can be completed within10 weeks, with somebuffer time
Can be completedwithin 10 weeks, withno buffer time
May face difficulties incompleting within 10weeks
Cannot be completedwithin 10 weeks
8. Project involves
multidisciplinary knowledge
and skills
Involves more than 3engineering fields whichare adequately balanced
Involves 3 engineeringfields, which areadequately balanced
Involves 2 engineeringfields, which areadequately balanced
Involves only 1engineering field
9. Project cost Estimated less thanRM200
Estimated betweenRM200 – RM250
Estimated betweenRM250 – RM300
Estimated more thanRM300
Total Score
Total Score Indication
28 – 36 Project is highly feasible and suitable for ETP
19 – 27 Project is moderately feasible and suitable for ETP. Project requires review to improve on the criteria where the scores are low.
< 19 Project does not meet ETP expectations. It is strongly suggested to modify the topic or change to a more feasible topic.
Supervisor’s Signature: _______________________________
Name: _______________________________Date: _______________________________
-
8/15/2019 Etp Guideline (September 2015)
21/39
APPENDIX III: PROJECT PROPOSAL SCORE SHEET FORM E1
MCB 3053 – ENGINEERING TEAM PROJECT
Group No Name ID
Supervisor 1.
Title
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Breakdown Guidelines for MarkingMarks
AllocatedMarks
1 Introduction
- Background analysis
- Objective statement- Problem definition- Design approach / methodology
30
2Project planning
- Gantt Chart- Task / work allocation- Project flow showing
involvement of all project
members
30
3Data gathering and
analysis
- Preliminary information(Behaviour trend and analysis)
- Documentation: references /survey / site visit
30
4Compliance to
requirement
- In-time submission- Report complies to
requirement/format10
TOTAL 100
Weightage in course: 10%
_________________________
Supervisor’s signature
Date: ____________________Note: Supervisors shall forwar d the completed form ( scanned copy) to ETP Coordi nator by th e deadline given.
-
8/15/2019 Etp Guideline (September 2015)
22/39
E n g i n e e r i n g T e a m P r o j e c t ( E T P ) : S e p t e m b e r 2 0 1 5 S e m e s t e r Page 22
APPENDIX IV: PROGRESS REPORT SCORE SHEET FORM E2
MCB 3053 – ENGINEERING TEAM PROJECT
Group No Name ID
Supervisor 1.
Title
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Breakdown Guidelines for MarkingMarks
AllocatedMarks
1 Introduction
- Project definition and problem
statement- Identification of potential solutions- Literature review- Design concept- Justification in choosing design
30
2 Project
planning
- Task listing and distribution- Logic of sequence of task- Feasibility of plan
20
3 Methodology- Identification of suitable tools or
software20
4Data gathering
and analysis
- Application of fundamentalengineering knowledge in solving or
analysing design problem- Validity & suitability of data
20
5Economical / business
consideration
- Capital cost considerations- Operational cost considerations- Alternatives in materials
5
6 Conclusion- Summary of progress and findings- Next plan of action
5
TOTAL 100
Weightage in course: 10%
_________________________
Supervisor’s signature
Date: ____________________Note: Supervisors shall forwar d the completed form (scanned copy) to ETP Coordi nator by th e deadline given.
-
8/15/2019 Etp Guideline (September 2015)
23/39
-
8/15/2019 Etp Guideline (September 2015)
24/39
E n g i n e e r i n g T e a m P r o j e c t ( E T P ) : S e p t e m b e r 2 0 1 5 S e m e s t e r Page 24
APPENDIX VI: POSTER EVALUATION SHEET FORM E4
MCB 3053 – ENGINEERING TEAM PROJECT
Group No
Title
Group Leader ID
Weightage: 10%
________________________ ____________________Examiner’s signature Name & Date
No. Component 4 3 2 1 Marks
1 Clarity of Images All images are in focus.Identifiable 2m away.
Most images are in focusIdentifiable 2m away
Most images are in focusIdentifiable 1m away
Many images are notclear or are too small.
2Originality ofGraphics
The graphics used reflectan exceptional degree ofstudent creativity.
One or two of thegraphics used reflectstudent creativity.
The graphics are madeby the student, but arebased on the designs ofothers.
No graphics made by thestudent are included.
3
Relevance of
Graphics
All graphics relevant.
All borrowed graphicshave a source citation.
Most graphics relevant.
All borrowed graphicshave a source citation.
Most graphics irrelevant.
Most borrowed graphicshave a source citation.
All graphics not relevant.
Most borrowed graphicswithout a source citation.
4OverallComposition:Figures, text, background.
Creatively composed.Suitable choice of colors.
Creatively composed. Satisfactorily composed Messy and distracting
5Accuracy ofContent / Facts
Over 90% accurate
Citation provided
Up to 70% accurate
Citation provided
Up to 50% accurate
Citation provided
Less than 50% accurate
Citation not provided
6Introduction:Problem statement,background & objective.
Clear & concise Satisfactory but lengthy Unclear No description at all
7 Methodology Clear & concise Satisfactory but lengthy Unclear No description at all
8Results &Conclusions
Clear & concise Satisfactory but lengthy Unclear No description at all
9Business/EconomicConsiderations
Clear & concise Satisfactory but lengthy Unclear No description at all
10 Texts & GrammarSuitable text sizes
No grammatical errors
Suitable text sizes
Some grammatical errors
Unsuitable text sizes
Some grammatical errors
Unsuitable text sizes
Many grammatical errors
Total (Max = 40)
-
8/15/2019 Etp Guideline (September 2015)
25/39
E n g i n e e r i n g T e a m P r o j e c t ( E T P ) : S e p t e m b e r 2 0 1 5 S e m e s t e r Page 25
APPENDIX VII: DEMONSTRATION OF WORKING PROTOTYPE/MODEL FORM E5
MCB 3053 – ENGINEERING TEAM PROJECT
Group No
Title
THEMEGroup Leader ID
Weightage: 20%
RECOMMENDED FOR SEDEX? YES / NO
________________________ ____________________Examiner’s signature Name & Date
No. Component 4 3 2 1 Marks
1 Level of Creativity
High:Excellent new andpractical idea that canbring extreme benefits tosociety
Substantial:New and practical ideathat can bring benefits tosociety
IncrementalPractical idea that canbring benefits to society
Operational:Repeating ideas andexisting procedures withlittle team input into theideas behind the project
2 Level of Innovation
Radical orBreakthrough:The work tackles a newmethodology to achievethe same function, andcould lead to a new
avenue of researchE.g. Using bioenergy ofhuman rider as powersource for bicycles
Substantial:The work is furtherapplied research,tackling a newmethod/material toachieve an existing
subfunctionE.g. The fabrication of aracing bicycle sub frameusing bamboo
Incremental:The work is appliedresearch, looking atsimple improvement ofan existing concept ordesign
E.g. Rear sensors on abicycle to warn riders ofimminent collision
Data Gathering:The work is purelynumber-crunching, withlittle associated noveltyE.g. measurement of
stress in bicycle spokesduring typical loadingcycle during cycling.
3Completion ofprototype
100 % 90 – 99 % 80 – 89 % < 80%
4Aesthetics &Finishing quality
Excellent geometry andassembly. Attractive colorand overall look. Cuttingsare very neat. Excellent
jointing
Attractive color andoverall look. Neatassembly. Cuttings arequite neat.Proper jointing.
Proper color chosen.Neat assembly.Poor cuttings.Satisfactory jointing
Poor overall look andcolor. Poor assemblyPoor cuttings.Poor jointing.
5Structure ofPrototype
Excellently rigid structure.Satisfactorily rigidstructure
Marginally stablestructure
Unstable structure.
6 Materials Appropriate materialswere carefully selectedbased on scientific facts.
Materials were selectedbased on scientific facts.
Materials were partlyselected based onscientific facts.
Inappropriate materialswere selected.
7Testing &Measurements
Clear evidence.Data taken several timesin a careful, reliablemanner.
Sufficient evidence.Data taken twice in acareful, reliable manner.
Some evidence.Data taken once in acareful, reliable manner.
Data not taken in areliable manner.
8
Understanding ofscientific principlesunderlying thefabrication/product
Members havecompletely clear andaccurate understanding
Members understandmost
Members have littleunderstanding
Members generally DIDNOT understand
9
Functionality /Ability toimplement thedesired task
Functions extraordinarilywell. 100%implementation
Functions well.90 – 99 %implementation
Functions pretty well, butwith minor defects80 – 89 %implementation
Major flaws in function.< 80% implementation
10 Demonstration skill Highly convincing Quite convincing Quite dubious Highly dubious
Total (Max = 40)
-
8/15/2019 Etp Guideline (September 2015)
26/39
E n g i n e e r i n g T e a m P r o j e c t ( E T P ) : S e p t e m b e r 2 0 1 5 S e m e s t e r Page 26
APPENDIX VIII: ORAL PRESENTATION: GROUP ASSESSMENT FORM E6
MCB 3053 – ENGINEERING TEAM PROJECT
Group No
Title
Group Leader ID
Weightage: 10%
________________________ ____________________Examiner’s signature Name & Date
No. Component 4 3 2 1 Marks
1Clarity ofPresentation
Very clear Quite clear Quite vague Very vague
2Sequence & TimeLimit
Logical sequence.Good continuityCompliance to time limit.
Logical sequence. Acceptable continuityExceed the time limit.
Acceptable continuityExceed the time limit.
Poor continuity.Exceed the time limit.
3Composition ofSlides
Very Good Good Marginal Poor
4Visual Aids(drawings & illustrations)
SuitableHigh quality
Adequate
Reasonable quality Adequate
Reasonable qualityInadequate
Low qualityInadequate
5Introduction(Background, problemstatement and objective)
Very clear Quite clear Quite vague Very vague
6Literature Review /Data Gathering
Highly adequate andrelevant
Adequate Marginal Poor
7 MethodologyJustified design selection
Adequate engineeringanalysis
Questionable designselection
Adequate engineeringanalysis
No design selectionSome engineeringanalysis
No design selectionMinimal engineeringanalysis
8 Project Planning Good work flowGood schedulingProper task distribution
Reasonable work flowProper schedulingProper task distribution
Quite poor work flowProper schedulingProper task distribution
Poor work flowPoor schedulingImproper task distribution
9Results &Discussions
Prototype well tested.Good discussions onresults.Business/Economicconsiderations
Prototype tested.Reasonable discussionson results
Prototype tested.Inadequate discussionson results
Prototype not tested.Minimal discussions.
10Conclusion &Recommendations
Highly convincing Quite convincing Quite dubious Highly dubious
Total (Max = 40)
-
8/15/2019 Etp Guideline (September 2015)
27/39
E n g i n e e r i n g T e a m P r o j e c t ( E T P ) : S e p t e m b e r 2 0 1 5 S e m e s t e r Page 27
APPENDIX IX: FINAL REPORT SCORE SHEET FORM E8
MCB3053 – ENGINEERING TEAM PROJECT
Group No Name ID Prog.
Supervisor
Title
Breakdown Guidelines for MarkingMarks
AllocatedMarks
1 Layout and
presentability
- Summary- Table of contents
- Appendices (compilation of relevantinformation)
10
2 Introduction - Background of project work- Objective- Problem definition and identification- Literature review
20
3 Procedure andanalysis
- Approach to solutions / methodology- Fundamental engineering analysis
20
4 Results - Technical specification and engineeringdrawing
- Project output
- Discussion on result- Conclusion- Recommendations
40
5Project
management
- Progress monitoring (Gantt Chart)- Task allocation
10
TOTAL 100
/ 15
Weightage in course: 15%
_________________________Supervisor’s signature
Date: ____________________Note: Supervisors shall forwar d the completed form ( scanned copy) to ETP Coordi nator by th e deadline given.
-
8/15/2019 Etp Guideline (September 2015)
28/39
E n g i n e e r i n g T e a m P r o j e c t ( E T P ) : S e p t e m b e r 2 0 1 5 S e m e s t e r Page 28
APPENDIX X: CALCULATION OF INDIVIDUAL CONTRIBUTION (IC) FORM E9
MCB3053 – ENGINEERING TEAM PROJECT
Group No
Supervisor
Title
No
Name IDWeek 2 Week 3 Week 4 Week 5 Week 6 Week 7 Week 8 Week 9 Week 10 Week 11 LB
5%MP5%
IC(10%
LB MP LB MP LB MP LB MP LB MP LB MP LB MP LB MP LB MP LB MP
1
2
3
4
5
Logbook marking guidelines (LB)
Criteria Score
Submit & Complete all tasks 0.9-1Submit & Complete most tasks 0.8-0.9
Submit & Complete few tasks 0.1-0.8
No submission (w/o reason) 0
Meeting & Participation marking guidelines (MP)
Criteria Score
Come on time & active 0.8-1Come on time & less active 0.7-0.8
Late & active 0.5-0.7
Late & less active 0.1-0.5
Absent (w/o reason) 0
______________________
Supervisor’s signature
Date: ____________________ Weightage: 10%
CALCULATION OF IC (EXAMPLE)
No
Name IDWeek 2 Week 3 Week 4 Week 5 Week 6 Week 7 Week 8 Week 9 Week 10 Week 11 LB
5%MP5%
IC(10%
LB MP LB MP LB MP LB MP LB MP LB MP LB MP LB MP LB MP LB MP
1 Ali 1234 0.9 0.7 0.8 0.8 0.9 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.9 0.9 0.8 0.9 0.9 0.8 0.9 0.9 0.8 0,8 0.9 0.8 4.3 4.1 8.4
-
8/15/2019 Etp Guideline (September 2015)
29/39
E n g i n e e r i n g T e a m P r o j e c t ( E T P ) : S e p t e m b e r 2 0 1 5 S e m e s t e r Page 29
APPENDIX XI: RESULT COMPILATION FORM E10
MCB3053 – ENGINEERING TEAM PROJECT
Group No
Supervisor
Title
SUPERVISOR OTHER EXAMINERS
No IDStudentName Prog.
Proj.Prop.
Prog.Rpt. Fab.
FinalRpt IC
Subtotal1 Poster Demo
GrpOral
Subtotal2
PeerEval T
10% 10% 10% 15% 10% 55% 15% 10% 10% 40% 5% 1
1
2
3
4
5
6
ASSESSMENT FOR EACH STUDENT (EXAMPLE)
SUPERVISOR OTHER EXAMINERS
No ID Student Name Prog.Proj.Prop.
Prog.Rpt. Fab.
FinalRpt IC
Subtotal1 Poster Demo
GrpOral
Subtotal2 To
10% 10% 10% 15% 10% 55% 10% 20% 10% 40% 100
1 XXXX STUDENT 1 CH 8 7.9 8.1 12 9 45 8 15 9.0 32 7
2 XXXX STUDENT 2 CH 8 7.9 8.1 12 8.7 44.7 8 15 9.0 32 76
3 XXXX STUDENT 3 CV 8 7.9 8.1 12 7.9 43.9 8 15 9.0 32 75
4 XXXX STUDENT 4 EE 8 7.9 8.1 12 9 45 8 15 9.0 32 7
5 XXXX STUDENT 5 ME 8 7.9 8.1 12 8 44 8 15 9.0 32 7
Note: Supervisors shall forward the completed form (scanned copy) to ETP Coordinator by the deadline given.
-
8/15/2019 Etp Guideline (September 2015)
30/39
E n g i n e e r i n g T e a m P r o j e c t ( E T P ) : S e p t e m b e r 2 0 1 5 S e m e s t e r Page 30
APPENDIX XII: LOGBOOK SUMMARY FORM E11
MCB3053 – ENGINEERING TEAM PROJECT
Group No Week No
SupervisorTitle
Student Name ID
Completed Activities (from last week)
Planned Activities (for next week)
Overall group progress vs. Gantt Chart:
Problems encountered:
Note: 1) Maximum 2 pages only
2) Supervisor needs to verify each student’s activities during the weekly meeting.
_______________________
Supervisor’s signature
Date: ____________________Note: Supervisors shall retain the forms for two consecutive years.
-
8/15/2019 Etp Guideline (September 2015)
31/39
E n g i n e e r i n g T e a m P r o j e c t ( E T P ) : S e p t e m b e r 2 0 1 5 S e m e s t e r Page 31
APPENDIX XIII: PROJECT PROPOSAL CONTENT
The project proposal must have the followings at minimum:
Details of the Project Team (front page)
Short Summary/Abstract
Problem Statement
Project Objectives
Background Study
Design Approach/MethodologyProceduresPlan and Schematic Flow Process of the ProjectHardware/Tools and Software
Project ManagementTask Allocation and Activities
Schedule/Gantt Chart
Group NumberProject:
Matric Number
Team LeaderMember
Member
…
-
8/15/2019 Etp Guideline (September 2015)
32/39
E n g i n e e r i n g T e a m P r o j e c t ( E T P ) : S e p t e m b e r 2 0 1 5 S e m e s t e r Page 32
APPENDIX XIV: SAMPLE OF REFERENCING FORMAT
The format of references for the respective sources is as follows:
1. journal refer to Meguid and Zhu (1995)
2. book refer to Glister P. (1993) 3. book in series refer to Ochoa, O.O and Reddy, J.N. (1989) 4. article in book/conference proceedings refer to Eskey, D and Grabe, W. (1988) 5. thesis refer to Mohd Shariff, A. (1995) 6. interview refer to Hamouda, A.M.S. (1994) 7. website refer to Duncan, Donna. (1998)
Meguid, S.A. and Zhu, Z.H., 1995, "A novel finite element for treating inhomogeneous solids,"
International Journal Numerical Methods Eng ineering 38 (2): 1579-1592
Glister P. 1993, The Internet Navigator, New York, John Wiley & Sons
Eskey, D and Grabe, W. 1988, "Interactive models for second language reading" in
P. Carrell, J. Devine and D. Eskey (Eds) Interactive approaches to Second Language Reading ,
Cambridge; Cambridge University Press
Hitam, P., 1995, Fundamental Study of X-111 Soil Characteristics, Ph.D. Thesis, Universiti Teknologi
PETRONAS, Malaysia.
Hamouda, A.M.S. 1994. LUSAS Ltd., UK, Private communication.
Websites (with author):
Author, Year, Title, Date accessed, from URL
Duncan, D. M., 2008, How to Eat Humble Pie, 6 Sept 2009, from http://www.geovillage.com
Websites (without author):
Title, Year, Date accessed, from URL
-
8/15/2019 Etp Guideline (September 2015)
33/39
E n g i n e e r i n g T e a m P r o j e c t ( E T P ) : S e p t e m b e r 2 0 1 5 S e m e s t e r Page 33
APPENDIX XV: SAMPLE OF COVER PAGE FOR FINAL REPORT
ENGINEERING TEAM PROJECT
TI TLE OF PROJECT
BY
GROUP NUMBER
Member 1 ( Matric Number)
Member 2 ( Matric Number)
Member 3 ( Matric Number)Member 4 ( Matric Number)
Member 5 ( Matric Number)
Member 6 ( Matric Number)
Supervisor:
January 2030
Universiti Teknologi PetronasBandar Seri Iskandar
31750 Tronoh,
-
8/15/2019 Etp Guideline (September 2015)
34/39
E n g i n e e r i n g T e a m P r o j e c t ( E T P ) : S e p t e m b e r 2 0 1 5 S e m e s t e r Page 34
Perak Darul Ridzuan
APPENDIX XVI: STUDENTS’ REQUISITION FORM FORM 03
Student's Name Student's ID
E-mail Address Contact No
ETP Group No Date
Project Title
Note: The cost of preparing project reports and posters including photocopying and stationeries are to be borne by the students
themselves.
No. Item Brand & Model
Dimension (L X W X H)/
description / material /specification
Vendor /
supplier
Unit
Price(RM) Qty
Amount
(RM)
Total
Verified by:(Lab Executive)
Certified by:(Project Supervisor)
Endorsed by:(ETP Coordinator)
Approved by:(Programme Head)
Signature
OfficialStamp
-
8/15/2019 Etp Guideline (September 2015)
35/39
E n g i n e e r i n g T e a m P r o j e c t ( E T P ) : S e p t e m b e r 2 0 1 5 S e m e s t e r Page 35
Date
APPENDIX XVII: STUDENTS’ REQUISITION FORM - SAMPLE FORM 03
Student's Name Suhana Bt Ramli Student's ID 12345
E-mail Address [email protected] Contact No 012-345 6789
ETP Group No 91 Date 14 Feb 2008
Project Title Electron X – provide brief description
Note: The cost of preparing project reports and posters including photocopying and stationeries are to be borne by the students
themselves.
No. Item Brand & Model
Dimension (L X W X H)/
description / material /specification
Vendor /
supplier
Unit
Price(RM) Qty
Amount
(RM)
1 Photovoltaic module Kyocera 120 X 10 X 10 mm / 250W Sunny Boy 88.90 1 88.90
2 Inductor Sumida CDH53 68 uH 1.5Arms 0.18DCR Xcel Circuit 63.50 1 63.50
3 Padding N/A 50 X 11 X 6 mm / rubber Eng Huat 5.00 6 30.00
4 Dividers N/A 3" X 6" sheet metal / steel Eng Huat 8.50 3 25.50
5 Spray paint Net Paint 1 liter / Oil-based paint Eng Huat 10.00 2 20.00
6 Galvanised washers N/A 3/8" / steel Eng Huat 3.50 4 14.00
7 Ply wood N/A 100 X 80 X 6 mm / wood Eng Huat 12.80 1 12.80
8 Hinges N/A 30 X 90 mm / brass Eng Huat 2.00 2 4.00
Total 258.70
Verified by:(Lab Executive)
Certified by:(Project Supervisor)
Endorsed by:(ETP Coordinator)
Approved by:(Programme Head)
Signature
Official
Stamp
Date
-
8/15/2019 Etp Guideline (September 2015)
36/39
E n g i n e e r i n g T e a m P r o j e c t ( E T P ) : S e p t e m b e r 2 0 1 5 S e m e s t e r Page 36
APPENDIX XVIII: JUSTIFICATION LETTER
MBB3013 – ENGINEERING TEAM PROJECT
To : AP Ir Dr Masri bin Baharom
Head, Department of Mechanical Engineering
From :
ETP Group No Contact :
CC (Supervisor) : Date :
Dear Sir,
RE: JUSTIFICATION FOR PURCHASE EXCEEDING ETP BUDGET
Referring to the above, we wish to request your approval to allow purchases more than RM200 for our ETP project. The table
below shows the list of items to be purchased, in descending order of price and corresponding justifications or supporting remarks.
No ItemPrice
(RM) Supplier
Is there any
cheaper
alternative
source?
Justifications / supporting remarks
Total
Thank you for your consideration.
Yours sincerely, Endorsed by (Supervisor ):
___ _____________ ___ _____________
Decision: tick ( )
Sign: __________________________ Date: __________________________
Remarks (if any): ______________________________________________________________________________
Approved Not Approved
-
8/15/2019 Etp Guideline (September 2015)
37/39
E n g i n e e r i n g T e a m P r o j e c t ( E T P ) : S e p t e m b e r 2 0 1 5 S e m e s t e r Page 37
APPENDIX XIX: JUSTIFICATION LETTER - SAMPLE
MAB/MBB 3013 – ENGINEERING TEAM PROJECT
To : Dr. Masri B Baharom
Head, Department of Mechanical Engineering
From : Suhana Bt Ramli
ETP Group No 88 Contact : 012 – 345 6789
CC (Supervisor) : Dr Mohd Jefri Date : 14 Feb 2008
Dear Sir,
RE: JUSTIFICATION FOR PURCHASE EXCEEDING ETP BUDGET
Referring to the above, we wish to request your approval to allow purchases more than RM200 for our ETP project. The table
below shows the list of items to be purchased, in descending order of price and corresponding justifications or supporting remarks.
No ItemPrice
(RM) Supplier
Is there any
cheaper
alternative
source?
Justifications / supporting remarks
1 Photovoltaicmodule
88.90Sunny
Boy No
There is only one sole supplier (Sunny Boy) in
Malaysia.
2
Inductor 63.50Xcel
Circuit No
Three quotations were obtained (RM77.50,
RM72.00 and RM63.50) and Xcel Circuit provided
the lowest price based on the same specification.
3 Padding 30.00
Eng Huat
For Items #3 - #8, Eng Huat is selected as the
location is near UTP, it has a complete range of
products meeting the specifications, hence is
convenient and helps reduce traveling time and
cost.
4 Dividers 25.50
5 Spray paint 20.00
6 Galvanised
washers14.00
7 Ply wood 12.808 Hinges 4.00
Total 258.70
Thank you for your consideration.
Yours sincerely, Endorsed by (Supervisor ):
___(Signature) _____________ ___(Signature) _____________
Decision: tick ( )
Sign: __________________________ Date: __________________________
Remarks (if any): ______________________________________________________________________________
Approved Not Approved
-
8/15/2019 Etp Guideline (September 2015)
38/39
E n g i n e e r i n g T e a m P r o j e c t ( E T P ) : S e p t e m b e r 2 0 1 5 S e m e s t e r Page 38
APPENDIX XX: ETP CLAIM BREAKDOWN FORM
MAB/MBB 3013 – ENGINEERING TEAM PROJECT
PREPARED BY
Student's Name Student's ID
E-mail Address Contact No
ETP Group No Date
Project Title (Refer Finance Reference from UTP Claim Form)
Please attach the completely endorsed Form UTP 03 and all the receipts.
Please use additional pages if necessary.
No. ItemDimension (L x W x H)/ description / material /
specificationReceipt No. Qty Amount
Total
Prepared by,
___________________________
-
8/15/2019 Etp Guideline (September 2015)
39/39
APPENDIX XXI: PEER EVALUATION TEMPLATE
Peer Evaluation : Engineering Team Project ETP GRP:
Student to be evaluated
Name: ID:
CATEGORY 4 3 2 1 ScoreContributions Routinely provides
useful ideas whenparticipating in the groupwork and discussion. Adefinite leader ormember who contributesa lot of effort.
Usually provides usefulideas when participating inthe group work anddiscussion. A strong groupmember who tries hard!
Sometimes providesuseful ideas whenparticipating in groupwork and discussion. Asatisfactory groupmember who does whatis required.
Rarely provides usefulideas when participatingin group work anddiscussion. May refuseto participate.
Quality ofWork
Provides work of thehighest quality.
Provides high qualitywork.
Provides work thatoccasionally needs tobe checked/redone byother group members toensure quality.
Provides work thatusually needs to bechecked/redone byothers to ensure quality.
Time-management
Routinely uses time wellthroughout the project toensure things get doneon time. Group does nothave to adjust deadlinesor work responsibilitiesbecause of this person'sprocrastination.
Usually uses time wellthroughout the project, butmay have procrastinatedon one thing. Group doesnot have to adjustdeadlines or workresponsibilities because ofthis person'sprocrastination.
Tends to procrastinate,but always gets thingsdone by the deadlines.Group does not have toadjust deadlines orwork responsibilitiesbecause of thisperson'sprocrastination.
Rarely gets things doneby the deadlines ANDgroup has to adjustdeadlines or workresponsibilities becauseof this person'sinadequate timemanagement.
Problem-solving
Actively looks for andsuggests solutions toproblems.
Refines solutionssuggested by others.
Does not suggest orrefine solutions, but iswilling to try outsolutions suggested byothers.
Does not try to solveproblems or help otherssolve problems. Letothers do the work.
Attitude Always has a positiveattitude about the
task(s). Never is publiclycritical of the project orthe work of others.
Often has a positiveattitude about the task(s).
Rarely is publicly critical ofthe project or the work ofothers.
Usually has a positiveattitude about the
task(s). Occasionally ispublicly critical of theproject or the work ofother members of thegroup.
Often has a negativeattitude about the
task(s). Often is publiclycritical of the project orthe work of othermembers of the group.
Reliability Consistently staysfocused on the task andwhat needs to be done.Very self-directed.
Focuses on the task andwhat needs to be donemost of the time. Othergroup members can counton this person.
Focuses on the taskand what needs to bedone some of the time.Other group membersmust sometimes nag,prod, and remind tokeep this person on-task.
Rarely focuses on thetask and what needs tobe done. Lets others dothe work.
TOTAL
Adapted from: http://coe.nevada.edu/slefevre/grouprubric.html
http://coe.nevada.edu/slefevre/grouprubric.htmlhttp://coe.nevada.edu/slefevre/grouprubric.htmlhttp://coe.nevada.edu/slefevre/grouprubric.htmlhttp://coe.nevada.edu/slefevre/grouprubric.html