ERIC VANDENBURG, SPENCER HOMAN, and TREVOR LARSON Team website: 1.
-
date post
19-Dec-2015 -
Category
Documents
-
view
216 -
download
0
Transcript of ERIC VANDENBURG, SPENCER HOMAN, and TREVOR LARSON Team website: 1.
1
TEAM STEADY SUPPLY
ERIC VANDENBURG, SPENCER HOMAN, and TREVOR LARSON
Team website: http://seniordesign.engr.uidaho.edu/2010-2011/microgrid/
2
Table of contents: Problem statement Project learning Design specifications Current design Pros & Cons of current design Constraints Ideas Load information Budget Schedule Goals
3
Problem description:
The purpose of this project is to redesign the auxiliary power system on the Advanced Electric Ship Demonstrator (AESD) to address the current shortcomings it possesses. It is important to perform a feasible study on this because the current power system has been found as a limiting factor in how well the ship can conduct necessary testing.
4
Project Learning
Gained knowledge of DC microgrids A better understanding of one-line
diagrams Basic battery bank design Site visit
The operations and uses of the AESD
5
Current Design:
6
What is an uninterruptible power supply (UPS):
7
Design specifications: Remove the (4) uninterruptible power supplies
(UPS) causing unwanted acoustics. Continuous power supply to the loads at all times. Draw power from a common bus. (possibly an
idea) Batteries capable of providing power for 1 hour. Shorten length of charge time to less than 3hours
8
Pros & Cons of existing design:
ConsUPS’s create acoustic noiseLoad balancing with UPS’sUPS’s discharging to fast, weak batteriesCharge timeRun time
ProsUninterruptible power supplyAlready implemented
○ Cheap
9
Constraints:
There are not to many constraints with this project the one that we keep in mind is space on the ship.
10
Options to consider for design
Lead-acid Lithium ion battery system Fuel cells (not feasible)
• Size needed for storage• cost
Back up battery banks Inverters, voltage protection, relays,
buck/boost converters….. Same designs but using different battery
types
11
Design process:
Brainstormed/researched DC microgrids Obtained load profiles from NAVSEA Calculated power consumed by the
auxiliary power system Determined the number of batteries
needed Design
12
New Design schematic
13
New design schematic
14
New design schematic
15
New design schematic
16
Load information:With Onboard Data Acquisition System (ODAS) equipment off:• UPS #1 – 6.0A• UPS #2 – 13.9A• UPS #3 – 2.0A• UPS #4 – 3.3A
With ODAS equipment on:• UPS #1 – 17.4A• UPS #2 – 18.5A• UPS #3 – 7.3A• UPS #4 – 3.3A
UPS #4 has weak batteries causing ODAS configuration not to be utilized for this unit.
17
Budget:
Since this is a design project with no prototypes our budget is limited to site visits.
18
Schedule: Design review November 18, 2010 Research battery bank designs by
November 19, 2010 Research cost of battery banks by
November 30, 2010 Create design by December 2, 2010 December 3, 2010 snapshot day December 9, 2010 design report and
website due December 9, 2010 log books due
19
Goals for next semester
(3) Detailed designsLead-acid battery designLithium-ion battery designOther
Documentation Choosing specific components with cut-
sheets Choose the best design for Expo
20
Questions: