ERIC VANDENBURG, SPENCER HOMAN, and TREVOR LARSON Team website: 1.

20
TEAM STEADY SUPPLY ERIC VANDENBURG, SPENCER HOMAN, and TREVOR LARSON Team website: http://seniordesign.engr.uidaho.edu/2010-2011/microgr id/ 1
  • date post

    19-Dec-2015
  • Category

    Documents

  • view

    216
  • download

    0

Transcript of ERIC VANDENBURG, SPENCER HOMAN, and TREVOR LARSON Team website: 1.

Page 1: ERIC VANDENBURG, SPENCER HOMAN, and TREVOR LARSON Team website:  1.

1

TEAM STEADY SUPPLY

ERIC VANDENBURG, SPENCER HOMAN, and TREVOR LARSON

Team website: http://seniordesign.engr.uidaho.edu/2010-2011/microgrid/

Page 2: ERIC VANDENBURG, SPENCER HOMAN, and TREVOR LARSON Team website:  1.

2

Table of contents: Problem statement Project learning Design specifications Current design Pros & Cons of current design Constraints Ideas Load information Budget Schedule Goals

Page 3: ERIC VANDENBURG, SPENCER HOMAN, and TREVOR LARSON Team website:  1.

3

Problem description:

The purpose of this project is to redesign the auxiliary power system on the Advanced Electric Ship Demonstrator (AESD) to address the current shortcomings it possesses. It is important to perform a feasible study on this because the current power system has been found as a limiting factor in how well the ship can conduct necessary testing.

Page 4: ERIC VANDENBURG, SPENCER HOMAN, and TREVOR LARSON Team website:  1.

4

Project Learning

Gained knowledge of DC microgrids A better understanding of one-line

diagrams Basic battery bank design Site visit

The operations and uses of the AESD

Page 5: ERIC VANDENBURG, SPENCER HOMAN, and TREVOR LARSON Team website:  1.

5

Current Design:

Page 6: ERIC VANDENBURG, SPENCER HOMAN, and TREVOR LARSON Team website:  1.

6

What is an uninterruptible power supply (UPS):

Page 7: ERIC VANDENBURG, SPENCER HOMAN, and TREVOR LARSON Team website:  1.

7

Design specifications: Remove the (4) uninterruptible power supplies

(UPS) causing unwanted acoustics. Continuous power supply to the loads at all times. Draw power from a common bus. (possibly an

idea) Batteries capable of providing power for 1 hour. Shorten length of charge time to less than 3hours

Page 8: ERIC VANDENBURG, SPENCER HOMAN, and TREVOR LARSON Team website:  1.

8

Pros & Cons of existing design:

ConsUPS’s create acoustic noiseLoad balancing with UPS’sUPS’s discharging to fast, weak batteriesCharge timeRun time

ProsUninterruptible power supplyAlready implemented

○ Cheap

Page 9: ERIC VANDENBURG, SPENCER HOMAN, and TREVOR LARSON Team website:  1.

9

Constraints:

There are not to many constraints with this project the one that we keep in mind is space on the ship.

Page 10: ERIC VANDENBURG, SPENCER HOMAN, and TREVOR LARSON Team website:  1.

10

Options to consider for design

Lead-acid Lithium ion battery system Fuel cells (not feasible)

• Size needed for storage• cost

Back up battery banks Inverters, voltage protection, relays,

buck/boost converters….. Same designs but using different battery

types

Page 11: ERIC VANDENBURG, SPENCER HOMAN, and TREVOR LARSON Team website:  1.

11

Design process:

Brainstormed/researched DC microgrids Obtained load profiles from NAVSEA Calculated power consumed by the

auxiliary power system Determined the number of batteries

needed Design

Page 12: ERIC VANDENBURG, SPENCER HOMAN, and TREVOR LARSON Team website:  1.

12

New Design schematic

Page 13: ERIC VANDENBURG, SPENCER HOMAN, and TREVOR LARSON Team website:  1.

13

New design schematic

Page 14: ERIC VANDENBURG, SPENCER HOMAN, and TREVOR LARSON Team website:  1.

14

New design schematic

Page 15: ERIC VANDENBURG, SPENCER HOMAN, and TREVOR LARSON Team website:  1.

15

New design schematic

Page 16: ERIC VANDENBURG, SPENCER HOMAN, and TREVOR LARSON Team website:  1.

16

Load information:With Onboard Data Acquisition System (ODAS) equipment off:• UPS #1 – 6.0A• UPS #2 – 13.9A• UPS #3 – 2.0A• UPS #4 – 3.3A

With ODAS equipment on:• UPS #1 – 17.4A• UPS #2 – 18.5A• UPS #3 – 7.3A• UPS #4 – 3.3A

UPS #4 has weak batteries causing ODAS configuration not to be utilized for this unit.

Page 17: ERIC VANDENBURG, SPENCER HOMAN, and TREVOR LARSON Team website:  1.

17

Budget:

Since this is a design project with no prototypes our budget is limited to site visits.

Page 18: ERIC VANDENBURG, SPENCER HOMAN, and TREVOR LARSON Team website:  1.

18

Schedule: Design review November 18, 2010 Research battery bank designs by

November 19, 2010 Research cost of battery banks by

November 30, 2010 Create design by December 2, 2010 December 3, 2010 snapshot day December 9, 2010 design report and

website due December 9, 2010 log books due

Page 19: ERIC VANDENBURG, SPENCER HOMAN, and TREVOR LARSON Team website:  1.

19

Goals for next semester

(3) Detailed designsLead-acid battery designLithium-ion battery designOther

Documentation Choosing specific components with cut-

sheets Choose the best design for Expo

Page 20: ERIC VANDENBURG, SPENCER HOMAN, and TREVOR LARSON Team website:  1.

20

Questions: