Equations for Static Failure
-
Upload
rob-morien -
Category
Documents
-
view
242 -
download
2
Transcript of Equations for Static Failure
R. Rizza 3/22/2007
Equations for Static Failure Theory.
by
Dr. Robert Rizza Associate Professor
Department of Mechanical Engineering Milwaukee School of Engineering
1025 N. Broadway Milwaukee, WI 53202
(414) 277-7377 Fax:(414) 277-2222
Email: [email protected] http://people.msoe.edu/~rizza
The equations are believed to be correct. But, if you find any errors please let me know by writing to [email protected].
1
R. Rizza 3/22/2007
Nomenclature Symbol Meaning
a Half the length of a 2-D crack β Stress intensity modification factor
ΚΙ, ΚΙΙ, ΚΙΙ Stress intensity factors KIc Fracture toughness (mode I) n Safety factor
σmax, σmin Maximum and minimum principal stresses σ1, σ2, σ3 Principal stresses
σeff Effective stress (Von Mises) σ% Effective stress (Coulomb-Mohr) σys Yield stress
Sut, Suc Ultimate tensile strength in tension and compression
Sys Strength in shear Ssu Ultimate shear strength
Ductile
1. Tresca (Maximum Shear Stress Theory) The failure criterion is:
max
max minmin
max min max min
if σ and have the same sign
if σ and have opposite sign
ys
ys
ys
σ σσ
σ σ
σ σ σ σ
⎫= ⎪⎬
= ⎪⎭− =
Safety factor (n):
1 3
ysnσ
σ σ=
−
Strength in pure shear:
2ys
ysSσ
=
2
R. Rizza 3/22/2007
2. Von Mises (Distortion Energy Theorem) The failure criterion is:
( ) ( ) ( )2 2 2 2
1 2 2 3 3 12 2 21 1 2 2
2 (3-D)
(plane stress)
ys
ys
σ σ σ σ σ σ σ
σ σ σ σ σ
− + − + − =
− + =
Safety factor (n):
ys
effn
σσ
=
where
( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
2 2 21 2 3 1 2 2 3 1 3
2 2 2 2 2 2
2 2 2
6
2
3 (plane stress)
eff
x y y z z x xy yz x
eff x y x y xy
σ σ σ σ σ σ σ σ σ σ
σ σ σ σ σ σ τ τ τ
σ σ σ σ σ τ
= + + − − −
− + − + − + + +=
= + − +
z
Strength in pure shear:
su2, S
33ys ut
shearSS
σ= =
Brittle Let σut and σuc be the strength in tension and compression, respectively. 1. Rankine (Maximum Normal Stress Theory) The failure criterion is:
1
2
ut
ut
S
S
σ
σ
=
=
3
R. Rizza 3/22/2007
2. Coulomb-Mohr (Modified Mohr) An approach by Dowling that does not require the drawing of the failure envelope (Figure 1, Figure 5-13 in Norton or Figure 6-22 Shigley) is based on the need to find an equivalent stress σ% . The safety factor is then
1 2 3 1 2 3Max(C , , , , , )0 if Max < 0
utSn
C Cσ
σ σ σ σσ
=
=
=
%
%
%
where
( )
( )
( )
1 1 2 1 2
2 2 3 2
3 3 1 3 1
212
212
212
ut uc
uc
ut uc
uc
ut uc
uc
C
C
C
σ σσ σ σ σ
σ
σ σσ σ σ σ
σ
σ σσ σ σ σ
σ
⎡ ⎤−= − + +⎢ ⎥
−⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦⎡ ⎤−
= − + +⎢ ⎥−⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦
⎡ ⎤−= − + +⎢ ⎥
−⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦
3
Figure 1 (based on Norton Figure 5-13, page 273 or page 272 Shigley).
4
R. Rizza 3/22/2007
Columb-Mohr for Plane Stress (σA and σB are principal stresses. Not good for fourth quadrant)
0
1 0
0
= ≥
− = ≥ ≥
= − ≥ ≥
utA A
A BA B
ut uc
ucB A
Sn
S S nSn
σ σ
σ σ
≥B
B
σ
σ σ
σ σ σ
Modified II-Mohr for Plane Stress (Good for fourth quadrant) ( ) 1 0 1
0
uc ut A B BA B
uc ut uc A
ucB A
S Sand
S S S nSn
σ σ σσ σσ
σ σ
−− = ≥ ≥ >
= − ≥ ≥ Bσ
Brittle Fracture Failure Modes
5
R. Rizza 3/22/2007
Crack Geometry and Nomenclature
Stress Field 1. Mode I
( )
3cos 1 sin sin2 2 2 2
3cos 1 sin sin , 02 2 2 2
3sin sin cos2 2 2 2
0 plane stress
plane strain
Ix
Iy xz yz
Ixy
zx y
Kr
Kr
Kr
θ θ θσ σπ
θ θ θσ σ τ τπ
θ θ θτ σπ
σν σ σ
⎛ ⎞⎛ ⎞ ⎛ ⎞ ⎛ ⎞= −⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟⎜ ⎟⎝ ⎠ ⎝ ⎠ ⎝ ⎠⎝ ⎠⎛ ⎞⎛ ⎞ ⎛ ⎞ ⎛ ⎞= +⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟⎜ ⎟⎝ ⎠ ⎝ ⎠ ⎝ ⎠⎝ ⎠
⎛ ⎞ ⎛ ⎞ ⎛ ⎞= ⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟⎝ ⎠ ⎝ ⎠ ⎝ ⎠
⎧⎪= ⎨ +⎪⎩
= =
2. Mode II
( )
3sin 2 cos cos2 22
3sin cos cos2 2 22
31 sin sin2 22
0 plane stress
plane strain
0
IIx
IIy
IIxy
zx y
xz yz
Kr
Kr
Kr
2θ θ θσ
πθ θ θσ
πθ θτ
π
σν σ σ
τ τ
⎛ ⎞⎛ ⎞ ⎛ ⎞ ⎛ ⎞= +⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟⎜ ⎟⎝ ⎠ ⎝ ⎠ ⎝ ⎠⎝ ⎠⎛ ⎞ ⎛ ⎞ ⎛ ⎞= ⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟⎝ ⎠ ⎝ ⎠ ⎝ ⎠
⎛ ⎞⎛ ⎞ ⎛ ⎞= − ⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟⎜ ⎟⎝ ⎠ ⎝ ⎠⎝ ⎠⎧⎪= ⎨ +⎪⎩
= =
6
R. Rizza 3/22/2007
3. Mode III
sin22
cos22
0
IIIxz
IIIyz
z x y xy
Kr
Kr
θτπ
θτπ
σ σ σ τ
⎛ ⎞= − ⎜ ⎟⎝ ⎠
⎛ ⎞= ⎜ ⎟⎝ ⎠
= = = =
Safety Factor
IC
I
KnK
=
Fracture Toughness of some Materials
7
R. Rizza 3/22/2007
Theoretical Stress Intensity Factors (From Machine Design February 1, 1968)
8
R. Rizza 3/22/2007
9
R. Rizza 3/22/2007
10