Environmental Monitoring Report

# Annual Report January - December 2019 October 2020

Indonesia: Neighborhood Upgrading and Shelter

Project - Phase 2

Prepared by the Directorate General of Human Settlements, Ministry of Public Works and Housing

for the Republic of Indonesia and the Asian Development Bank.

CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS (as of 26 October 2020)

Currency unit – rupiah (Rp) Rp1.00 = $0.0000680874

$1.00 = Rp14,687

NOTE

(i) In this report, "$" refers to United States dollars unless otherwise stated This environmental monitoring report is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area.

Table of Contents

Table of Contents ...................................................................................................................................

List of Figures ........................................................................................................................................ i

List of Tables .......................................................................................................................................... i

List of Appendices ................................................................................................................................. i

Abbreviations ........................................................................................................................... ii

Chapter 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................... 1

Chapter 2. Key Project Activities and Progress ...................................................................... 2

Chapter 3. Environmental Mitigation and Monitoring Status ................................................... 4

3.1 Requirements of Environmental Safeguards ...................................................... 4

3.2 Key Roles and Responsibilities ........................................................................... 4

3.3 Community Contracts .......................................................................................... 7

3.4 Complex Civil Work Contract .............................................................................. 7

3.5 New Site Development Contracts ....................................................................... 8

Chapter 4. Public Consultation and Information Disclosure .................................................... 8

Chapter 5. Information Disclosure .......................................................................................... 8

Chapter 6. Grievance Redress Mechanism ............................................................................ 9

Chapter 7. Project Staffing and Capacity Building ................................................................ 10

Chapter 8. Key Issues and Corrective Actions ..................................................................... 10

Chapter 9. Conclusions and Recommendations ................................................................... 11

APPENDICES ....................................................................................................................... 13

i

List of Figures

Figure 1. NUSP-2 Project Location ................................................................................................... 1

Figure 2. Paving Road and Drainage Channel Contract, Tambak Rejo - Semarang ................ 3

Figure 3. Monthly Reports Prepared by the City Coordinators ..................................................... 7

Figure 4. Grievance Redress Mechanism ........................................................................................ 9

List of Tables

Table 1. Institutional Roles and Responsibilities ............................................................................. 4

Table 2. Key Issues and Corrective Actions .................................................................................. 11

List of Appendices

Appendix 1. Environmental Screeening and Assessment for Sawah Lebar Baru Community

Contract, Bengkulu ............................................................................................................................. 14

Appendix 2. Monitoring Progress of Construction Work in Tambak Rejo, Semarang ............. 17

Appendix 3. CAP Drafting Process for Kota Karang, Bandar Lampung .................................... 20

Appendix 4. Technical Coordination Meeting, January 2019 ...................................................... 25

ii

Abbreviations

ADB Asian Development Bank

AP

Bappenas

affected people

Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan Nasional (National Planning Bureau)

CA Community Advisor

CAP Community Action Plan

CC City Coordinator

CIO Community Implementing Organization (or BKM Badan Keswadayaan

Masyarakat)

CPMU Central Project Management Unit

DGHS Directorate General of Housing Settlements

DLH Dinas Lingkungan Hidup (Environmental Agency)

EA Executing Agency

EARF Environmental Review and Assessment Framework

EIA Environmental Impact Assessment

EMP Environmental Management Plan

EMS Environmental Management System

FY Fiscal Year

GRC Grievance Redress Committee

GRM Grievance Redress Mechanism

IEE Initial Environmental Examination

IPAL Instalasi Pengolahan Air Limbah (Communal Wastewater Treatment

Plant)

KPP Kelompok Pemanfaat dan Pemelihara (Operation and Maintenance

Group)

KSM Kelompok Swadaya Masyarakat (Community Self-Help Group)

LCO Local Coordinating Office

MDG Millennium Development Goals

MPWH Ministry of Public Work and Housing

Muskel Musyawarah Kelurahan (neighborhood assembly meeting)

NMC National Management Consultant

NSD New Site Development

NUSP-2 Neighborhood Upgrading and Shelter Project Phase 2

O&M Operation and Maintenance

PIU Project Implementing Unit (Satker or Satuan Kerja)

PMU

PPK

Project Management Unit

Pejabat Pembuat Komitmen (Commitment Officer)

Satker Satuan Kerja (Project Implementing Unit)

SPPL Surat Pernyataan Kesanggupan Pengelolaan dan Pemantauan

Lingkungan (Statement Letter for Environmental Management and

Monitoring)

UKL-UPL

UPTD

Upaya Pengelolaan Lingkungan dan Upaya Pemantauan Lingkungan

(Environmental Management Effort - Environmental Monitoring Effort)

document

Unit Pelaksana Teknis Daerah (Local Technical Implementing Unit)

Chapter 1. Introduction

1. Project Background. The Neighborhood Upgrading and Shelter Project – Phase 2

(NUSP-2) is aimed to upgrade basic public infrastructure in slum settlements, and contribute

to meeting the Millennium Development Goal (MDG) targets for achieving significant

improvement in the lives of slum dwellers (MDG target 7D) and halving the proportion of urban

households without sustainable access to safe drinking water and basic sanitation (MDG

target 7C).1 The NUSP-2 also contributes to the implementation of the Cities without Slums

Program launched by the Indonesian Government.2

2. The NUSP-2 is an ADB-funded project, particularly upgrading and/or developing basic

infrastructure and facilities for selected slum areas at 99 neighborhoods (kelurahan). These

neighborhoods are distributed in 20 districts (kabupaten) and municipalities (kota) located

across Sumatra, Java, Kalimantan, Sulawesi, Nusa Tenggara, and Maluku Islands as shown

in Figure 1. The executing agency of the NUSP-2 is the Directorate General of Human

Settlements (DGHS) of the Ministry of Public Works and Housing (MPWH).

Figure 1. NUSP-2 Project Location

3. The NUSP-2 assists the local governments in upgrading and/or developing basic

infrastructure and facilities at selected neighborhoods in order to achieve the following:

1 The 2015 MDG target for the proportion of the urban population living in slums is 6%; in 2011, 12.6% of the

urban population lived in slums. The 2015 MDG target for the proportion of households with sustainable access to an improved water source is 75.5%; in 2011, 40.5% of urban households had access to an improved water source, 72.5% had access to basic sanitation. The proportion of households with access to safe water and basic sanitation in slum areas is assumed to be much lower.

2 The Cities without Slums Program is incorporated in the National Long-Term Development Plan, 2005–2025. It aims to reduce slum areas in cities by 2025 by promoting concerted initiatives by the central and local governments, private sector, and civil society.

Tanjung

Balai

Bengkulu

Serang

Sukabumi

Semarang

Pasuruan

Bima

Tanjung

Jabung Barat

Kapuas

Bandar

Lampung

Makassar

Kendari

Ambon

Batam

Palembang

Banjarmasin

Pekalongan

Palangkaraya

Bone

Palopo

2

Output 1: Institutional capacities for managing pro-poor urban development strengthened;

Output 2: Infrastructure in slum neighborhoods upgraded; and

Output 3: New settlements for poor families established.

4. There are seven types of infrastructures and facilities built under the NUSP-2, among

others, construction of road, bridge, basic sanitation facilities, and communal wastewater

treatment plant; installation of clean water supply and street lighting; and provision of municipal

solid waste handling facility and transportation as well as basic fire-fighting equipment.

5. Objective and Scope of the Monitoring Report. This 2019 annual environmental

monitoring report (AEMR) summarizes the NUSP-2 activities and describes its environmental

safeguards implementation and compliance against the EARF requirements in 2019. This is

the final monitoring report submitted to ADB following the loan closing date for NUSP-2 in

December 2019. This monitoring report covers the following aspects:

• Chapter 2 Key project activities and progress

• Chapter 3 Implementation of environmental mitigation and monitoring status

• Chapter 4 Public consultation and disclosure

• Chapter 5 Information disclosure

• Chapter 6 Grievance redress mechanism

• Chapter 7 Capacity building

• Chapter 8 Key issues and corrective actions

• Chapter 9 Conclusions and recommendations.

Chapter 2. Key Project Activities and Progress

6. Community contract. In 2019, the NUSP-2 planned to commission 31 community

contract works in 6 cities/district (i.e., Tanjung Jabung Barat, Bengkulu, Bandar Lampung,

Semarang, Kapuas, and Makassar). However, these community contract works were

cancelled due to partial loan cancelation recommended by the National Planning Bureau

(Bappenas).

7. Complex civil work. Only 1 (one) complex civil work was continued and completed in

Tambak Rejo neighborhood, Semarang City. The types of infrastructure constructed under

this contract in are road paving and associated drainage channel. This construction work has

been completed in March 2019. The progress and the result of this construction works are

shown in Figure 1.

8. New site development (NSD). The activities of four NSDs in Kendari, Palopo, Bima

and Kapuas are reported separately under the obligation of the initial environmental

examination (IEE) report. In 2019, the construction of infrastructure and facilities at the two

NSD sites in Kendari and Palopo have been completed, whereas those of Bima and Kapuas

just commenced in late 2019. Nevertheless, the occupation of houses at these NSD has

commenced since 2019.

3

Construction Phase

After Construction

Figure 2. Paving Road and Drainage Channel Contract, Tambak Rejo - Semarang

4

Chapter 3. Environmental Mitigation and Monitoring Status

3.1 Requirements of Environmental Safeguards

9. According to the ADB’s Safeguard Policy Statement (2009), the NUSP-2 is classified

as Category B project, i.e., the project could have some adverse environmental impacts, but

of lesser degree or significance than those in category A project. The impacts are site specific

and can be readily addressed through common mitigation measures. The NUSP-2 creates

positive impacts on the environment and improves the wellbeing of the community through

alleviation of slum areas in emerging cities in Indonesia.

10. The Environmental Assessment and Review Framework (EARF) document for NUSP-

2 was prepared in 2014, providing screening procedure and checklist to review environmental

implications of the infrastructure and facility to be constructed. The EARF requires that:

• An initial environmental examination (IEE) report is prepared by DGHS as part of the new

site development (NSD) proposal and then cleared by ADB for disclosure; and

• Environmental Mitigation and Monitoring Effort (UKL-UPL) or Statement Letter to Conduct

Environmental Mitigation and Monitoring (SPPL) is prepared by DGHS according to the

Ministry of Environment Regulations No. 5/2012 on Types of Activities and/or Projects

Requiring Environmental Impact Assessment (AMDAL) and No. 16/2012 on the Guidance

for the Preparation of Environmental Documents; and Ministry of Public Work Regulation

No. 10/PRT/M/2008 on Types of Activities and/or Projects in the Public Work Sector

Subject to be Completed with UKL-UPL.

3.2 Key Roles and Responsibilities

11. The key roles and responsibilities of the executing and implementing agencies

involved in the implementation of NUSP-2 including their respective environmental

responsibilities, are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1 Institutional Roles and Responsibilities

Institutions and Responsibilities

Activities and Status Status

Directorate General of Housing Settlement (Executing Agency)

• Overall coordination,

supervision,

monitoring.

The coordination, supervision and monitoring by the

PMU/EA were mostly done through coordinating and

review meetings, in which safeguard issues were

discussed, including collecting evidences. Some

supervision meetings were conducted on ad hoc basis and

on the sites.

Compliant

• Preparation and

submission of quarterly

progress and

evaluation reports.

In 2019 the PMU submitted four quarterly progress and

evaluation reports to ADB (QPR 1 January – March; QPR

2 April – June; QPR 3 July - September; QPR 4 October –

December).

Compliant

• Prepare guidelines for

the environmental due

diligence and

monitoring of

environmental

management plan.

The DGHS had published a Technical Guideline on Social

and Environmental Management in September 2016, that

has been used along the implementation of NUSP-2

project. This guideline was a sort of manual and reference

to implement and monitor the environmental and social

safeguard components using screening checklist forms

and templates provided.

Compliant

5

Institutions and Responsibilities

Activities and Status Status

Public Works (Local Coordinating Officer) at City or District Level

• Provide overall

coordination,

supervision, monitoring

and approval of

neighborhood

proposals including

environmental

checklists.

In 2019, the LCO at the Local Planning Agencies of the

selected 6 cities oversaw the overall implementation of

NUSP-2 intervention, including approval of the

neighborhood proposals to continue the community

contract construction works. The supervision and

monitoring by the LCO and City Satker conducted through

the finalization process of the Community Action Plan

(CAP).

For the 4 NSDs, the LCO also coordinated and supervised

the proposal and the implementation of environmental

safeguard mitigations and monitoring through various

meetings.

Complied

• Prepare quarterly

progress reports

including

environmental.

The LCO provided inputs to the PMU on the quarterly

progress reports of the NUSP-2 intervention. Some reports

included monitoring on infrastructure progress on 50% and

on 100%, which were also uploaded in Management

Information System or MIS (www.nusp2.id).

Complied

• Provide technical

support to community

advisors and

BKMs/CIOs.

The technical support provided by LCO through

consultation and coordination when the Badan

Keswadayaan Masyarakat (BKM) presents their CAP.

Along the process of construction works, the Local Public

Work Agency provide technical support, coaching and

empowerment.

Complied

• Carry out

environmental due

diligence.

• For the community contract, the environmental due

diligence was carried out using the environmental

screening checklist. Subsequently, this information is

utilized to develop the SPPL for submission to the Local

Environmental Agency.

• For the complex civil work contract, the SPPL is

prepared by City Satker and the contractor firm assisted

by the CCs (City Coordinators).

• For the NSD, the IEE and UKL-UPL documents are

prepared for ADB/DGHS endorsement and local

government respectively. Subsequently, in 2019, all

mitigation and monitoring measures have been reported

in the Semi-Annual Environmental Monitoring Report of

each NSD.

• Complied

• Complied

• Complied

• Monitor the

implementation of the

environmental

management plan.

The LCO has been monitoring the implementation of

environmental management plan in ad-hoc basis through

visiting the site for visual inspection. There was no

documentation on this activity recorded as this is a

common practice.

Complied

Environmental Agency at City or District Level (Dinas Lingkungan Hidup/DLH)

• Provide guidance on

environmental

checklists.

The Environmental Agencies used the checklists provided

in the Technical Guidelines mentioned above as the

reference for issuing the approval for SPPL document for

each CAP.

Complied

• Coordinate with

community advisors to

conduct site visits to

validate the screening

results.

The Environmental Agencies conducted site visits to

validate the environmental screening results on 0% point

of infrastructure during the community meeting, and

validate monitoring results on 50% and 100% of

infrastructure progress to verify the requirement of budget

disbursement. There was no documentation on this activity

recorded as this is a common practice.

Complied

6

Institutions and Responsibilities

Activities and Status Status

• Review the engineering

design and

environmental

checklists and provide

permit for construction

of a deep well.

There is no deep well constructed as part of the NUSP-2 in

2019.

Not applicable

• Conduct random

checking during

construction and after

completion to inspect

environmental

procedures and

impacts.

Random checking was done by the Environmental

Agencies during construction and after completion to also

make sure of infrastructure quality and gave technical

inputs for improvement where needed. There was no

documentation on this activity recorded as this is a common

practice.

Complied

Health Agency at City or District Level

• Test collected water

quality samples to

determine if collected

water sources meet the

drinking water

standards.

This water testing was not conducted, as most of the clean

water source for the NSD sites were supplied from treated

water from the municipal water company (known as

Perusahaan Daerah Air Minum or PDAM).

Not applicable

Community Implementation Organization (CIO)

• Responsible for

establishing project

implementation units.

The CIO established the project implementing units in the

form of community self-help group (Kelompok Swadaya

Masyarakat or KSM) to implement the NUSP-2 activities.

Complied

• Responsible for

conducting

environmental

checklists assisted by

community advisors/

safeguard specialist.

The CIO, assisted by the CA and CC, conducted

environmental screening by visual inspection and review

of the CAP using the checklist forms included in the

Technical Guideline for Social and Environmental

Management (2016).

Complied

• Formulate the

Operation and

Maintenance (O & M)

mechanisms.

The O&M mechanism was formulated during finalization of

the CAP. In 2019, since there was a loan cancelation, the

CIOs only underwent the process up till formulating the

CAP.

Complied

• Responsible for

monitoring construction

activities and

conducting inspection

for completed

interventions.

This activity of responsibility was not performed since the

project did not proceed to the construction works for the

community contract due to loan cancelation.

Not applicable

• Disclose, on the

neighborhood board,

neighborhood

proposals and

contracts including

environmental

checklists.

The discussion to develop and finalize the neighborhood

proposals was conducted through series of discussion at

the neighborhood assembly meetings (musyawarah

kelurahan/Muskel II - III). However, the proposals,

contracts, and checklists were not disclosed on the

neighborhood board due to uncertainty of the funds to

continue of project.

Partially complied

• Responsible for taking

any negative feedback

related to site,

construction, and

operation from other

neighborhood

members and

This activity was not performed since the project did not

proceed to the construction works due to partial loan

cancelation in 2019.

Not applicable

7

Institutions and Responsibilities

Activities and Status Status

organizing meetings to

solve problems.

• Responsible for

reporting environmental

monitoring to LCOs

This activity of responsibility was not performed since the

project did not proceed to the construction works for the

community contract due to partial loan cancelation.

Not applicable

3.3 Community Contracts

12. Environmental Mitigation and Monitoring. The community contracts for 31

neighborhoods in 6 cities (i.e., Bengkulu, Tanjung Jabung Barat, Bandar Lampung,

Semarang, Kapuas, and Makassar) were cancelled for 2019 following the partial loan

cancellation. However, prior to this, the CIO of each neighborhood has prepared the CAP,

starting with the environmental and social screening process based on the NUSP-2 Technical

Guidelines on Social and Environmental Management. A sample of this screening process

using the checklist forms is provided in Appendix 1.

13. Assisted by the CA, the CIO conducted a neighborhood meeting (Musyawarah

Kelurahan or Muskel III) to disseminate the screening result and discuss the CAP. However,

due to the partial loan cancellation in 2019, the process beyond the CAP is discontinued.

Nevertheless, the City Coordinators kept preparing the monthly project reports for these 31

community contracts until March 2019 (as shown in Figure 3).

Figure 3. Monthly Reports Prepared by the City Coordinators

3.4 Complex Civil Work Contract

14. Environmental Mitigation. In 2019, one remaining package of multi-year contract in

Tambak Rejo neighborhood, Semarang City was progressed and completed in March 2019.

The SPPL for this civil work contract was submitted to the Integrated Permitting Office (Dinas

Penanaman Modal Pelayanan Terpadu Satu Pintu) of Semarang City in early January 2019.

15. Environmental Monitoring. For the complex civil work contract, the CCs in

coordination with LCO are responsible for the day-to-day environmental monitoring during the

8

construction activities. The SG-5 form was used to conduct the monitoring for both social and

environmental safeguard of the construction works conducted at Tambak Rejo neighborhood

(see Appendix 2).

3.5 New Site Development Contracts

16. As of end 2019, the semi-annual monitoring reports (SAEMR) of Bima and Palopo

NSDs have been completely submitted and cleared by ADB for disclosure. However, Kapuas

and Kendari NSDs have only submitted the SAEMR of January to June 2019 to ADB, and

therefore the July to December 2019 reports are still pending. In any case, the environmental

mitigation and monitoring measures for each NSD were implemented by the respective

contractors and monitored by each City/District Satker.

Chapter 4. Public Consultation and Information Disclosure

17. The NUSP-2 project conducted public consultation as an integral part of the

identification, selection and implementation of neighborhood infrastructure interventions. For

the community contract packages, neighborhood meetings (known as musyawarah

kelurahan) were conducted to discuss the environmental and social safeguard, formulate the

Community Action Plan (CAP), and select the kelompok swadaya masyarakat (KSM, or

Community Implementing Organization or CIO) as the implementing unit. Through these

meetings, all community members and concerned stakeholders would have such forum to

raise their concerns on the project and subsequently seek resolution. So far, there is no report

of any concerns or complaints addressed to the KSM.

18. In 2019, public consultation concerning the community-contract typed projects were

conducted. An example of this public consultation in Kota Karang neighborhood of Bandar

Lampung City is presented in Appendix 3. At this consultation, the community members

discussed the activity plan formulated into the CAP and disseminated safeguard requirements

for the project.

19. Other public consultations were conducted at Kendari, Palopo, Bima, and Kapuas with

potential beneficiaries whether they are interested in occupying the houses in the he NSD

including associated rules and responsibilities. The local communities were consulted for job

and business opportunities to be recruited as construction workers or suppliers. The more

detailed description with evidences and documentations of these consultation and discussion

are reported separately and provided in each Semi-Annual Environmental Monitoring Reports

of each NSD.

Chapter 5. Information Disclosure

20. The information on the implementation, the progress, as well as on related public

consultation, discussion, and neighborhood meetings of community contract and complex civil

work packages are documented and uploaded into the NUSP-2’s website (www.nusp2.id).

9

Along the project, NUSP-2 had also published about six posters explaining the NUSP-2 project

and one special poster on NSD. These posters dissemination is another strategy to reach out

the potential beneficiaries. These posters have been distributed gradually in 2016 till 2018 and

mentioning the email addresses and mobile contact numbers to redress grievance or

complains from communities. Most of these posters had been presented in previous AEMR of

2017 and 2018.

Chapter 6. Grievance Redress Mechanism

21. The NUSP-2 has established its Grievance Redress Mechanism (GRM), which

consists of three levels, i.e. at the neighborhood, at the city/district, and at the national levels

as shown in Figure 4. This leveling system of the GRM is expected to timely address any

complaints during project implementation. Affected people will have the right to file complaints

and/or queries related to disturbance or environmental impacts due to the project activities.

Figure 4. Grievance Redress Mechanism

22. There was no major complaint about the NUSP-2 project reported in 2019. Some minor

complaints concerning the maintenance of the NSD housing were recorded and resolved by

respective Management Board and reported in related Semi-Annual Environmental Monitoring

Report of the respective NSD.

10

Chapter 7. Project Staffing and Capacity Building

23. The consulting services are provided at the national, city/district and kelurahan level.

At the national level, a team of consultants assist the Central Project Management Unit

(CPMU) of the NUSP-2, namely the National Management Consultant (NMC) based in

Jakarta. Part of this NMC, a safeguard specialist and the two safeguard assistants were

recruited to prepare social and environmental management guidelines, checking supporting

data and documents from the field in the project’s NUSP-2 website, incorporating

environmental monitoring in the quarterly progress reports and environmental survey results

in the monitoring and evaluation framework. The NMC’s safeguard team also prepared the

reports on annual environmental monitoring, semi-annual social monitoring, and semi-annual

environmental monitoring report of NSD.

24. In addition to each NSD, there are four sub-specialists responsible to assist in day-to-

day monitoring and evaluation for the implementation of the NSD. This also includes assisting

the city/district Satker and the LCO and collecting data for monitoring the implementation of

mitigation measures set forth in the EMP of the IEE. They are based in the NSD sites of

Kendari, Palopo, Bima, and Kapuas

25. At the city/district level there were City Coordinators (CCs) based in 6 cities/districts of

the NUSP-2 project, responsible in assisting the city/district Satker, the Local Coordinating

Offices (LCOs), and the Community Advisors (CAs). The CCs also responsible for conducting

review and screening of the environmental and social safeguard checklists. Further, they

reviewed the completion of necessary safeguard documents, and reviewed the quality of

documentations uploaded by the CAs or the Community Implementing Organizations (CIOs)

in the NUSP-2 website.

26. At the kelurahan level, there were CAs who may in-charge for 1 - 2 kelurahans, and

responsible for assisting each CIO for day-to-day management of the community contract

works, among others, facilitating the establishment of CIO and user groups; facilitating the

preparation of Community Action Plans (CAPs); and providing the community with technical

guidance in book-keeping, documentation and report preparation.

27. In January 2019, the Safeguard Team joined the Technical Coordination Meeting in

Grand Tropic Hotel, Jakarta, for the CCs, CAs and Sub-Specialists NSD. The Safeguard

Specialist joined the class of Sub-Specialist NSD to brief them the Environmental

Management Plan (EMP) on each NSD site. Invitation letter and pictures of these events is

shown in Appendix 4. In addition, the capacity building was also done by the Satker staff

members and safeguard consultant team during the site visit to the NSDs in Kapuas (March

2019), Palopo (April 2019), Kendari (May 2019), and Bima (September 2019).

Chapter 8. Key Issues and Corrective Actions

28. Some corrective actions for pending issues were completed, some are still partially

achieved and some not achieved. The corrective actions on the gaps of EMP implementation

identified in the 2018 AEMR have been followed up in 2019, and reported in Table 2 .

11

Table 2 Key Issues and Corrective Actions

No Key Issues / Gaps Corrective Actions PIC & Schedule Status/Progress

up to Oct 2019

1 The Local

Environmental

Agencies (DLH) have

not yet conducted

random checking

during construction

and after completion to

inspect environmental

procedures and

impacts.

The Local

Environmental Agencies

needs to conduct

random checking during

and after completion of

the construction works

in 2019.

PIC: DLHs

Schedule: During site

visits and ad-hoc

events in Q4 of 2018

and Q1 of 2019.

Completed – The DLH

officer checked the

completion of complex

civil works in Tambak

Rejo, Semarang.

2 The formulation and

establishment of the

O&M mechanism.

Monitoring the formulation of O&M mechanism for Kendari, Bima and Kapuas NSD in the Q1 2019.

PIC: LCO at respective local Public Work offices.

Schedule: Q1 2019

Partially achieved –

Palopo, Bima and

Kapuas NSDs already

have the O&M

mechanism for NSD

Management Board,

while for Kendari NSD,

the local government is

now preparing the

Mayor’s Decree for NSD Management Board

3 Environmental

safeguard monitoring

at Tambak Rejo

neighborhood,

Semarang City

Monitoring the continuation of multi-years contract in Tambak Rejo neighborhood, Semarang City (to be reported in the next report).

PIC: CA/CC

Schedule:

During site visits

Completed – the work

completed on March

2019.

Chapter 9. Conclusions

29. Conclusions. In 2019, there were only few NUSP-2 subprojects conducted: NSD

construction activities in Bima City and Kapuas District; and a multi-year, complex civil work

contract in Tambak Rejo, Semarang City. Thirty-one community-typed contracts were

cancelled due to Bappenas’ recommendation to partially cancel the NUSP-2 loan.

30. The monitoring of environmental mitigation was conducted in a participatory and

consultative manner, involving the related stakeholders particularly the community. Monitoring

of environmental mitigation on the projects/sub-projects implemented has generally improved

over the previous year with regards to the capacity building conducted, completeness and

quality of supporting documents provided for this 2019 monitoring report.

31. As for the responsibility of the agencies and community organizations, only partially

complied status is about the proposals, contracts, and checklists which were not disclosed on

the neighborhood boards. The disclosure was not conducted due to uncertainty of the funds

to continue of project. However, the process of preparing these checklists, proposals and

contracts were conducted in a participatory and transparent manner through series of

neighborhood meetings.

12

32. Corrective actions identified in the 2018 monitoring reports in relation to conducting

safeguards monitoring have been completed in 2019. One corrective action remains partially

achieved is related to the absence of major decree on the establishment of Kendari NSD

board.

13

APPENDICES

14

Appendix 1. Environmental Screeening and Assessment for Sawah Lebar Baru Community Contract, Bengkulu

1.a. Form SFG-1 to Screen Out Negative Investment List Activities for Community Contract Work Packages in Sawah Lebar Baru, Bengkulu City

15

16

1.b. Form SFG-2 to Identify Social and Environment Impacts

17

Appendix 2. Monitoring Progress of Construction Work in Tambak Rejo, Semarang

18

19

20

Appendix 3. CAP Drafting Process for Kota Karang, Bandar Lampung

3.a. Minutes of Meeting MUSKEL III

21

22

23

3.a. List Attendances of Meeting MUSKEL III

24

3.c. Notes of Meeting MUSKEL III

3.d. Photos of Meeting MUSKEL III

25

Appendix 4. Technical Coordination Meeting, January 2019

4a. The Invitation Letter to the Meeting

26

4b. Picture of Technical Coordination Meeting, January 2019