Employee Engagement Doug

download Employee Engagement Doug

of 27

Transcript of Employee Engagement Doug

  • 7/31/2019 Employee Engagement Doug

    1/27

    Employee Engagement:Motivated and Productive People

    Who are Innovative and Creative.

    Doug Buchanan, Associate Vice Chancellor for Human Resources

  • 7/31/2019 Employee Engagement Doug

    2/27

    Tell me what you want me to do

    and Ill do it.

    Engaged?

  • 7/31/2019 Employee Engagement Doug

    3/27

    Introduction Overview of Employee Engagement

    UMKCs previous attempts to measure Employee

    Engagement

    New collaborations and a broader definition

    The Pilot Project

    What the research yields

    Blending all the research pieces together

    Recommendations for any organization

    Conclusion

  • 7/31/2019 Employee Engagement Doug

    4/27

    Overview of Employee Engagement Why we care

    Positive psychology vs. disease, damage, disorder, disability

    Research:

    Popular business publications, etc. (i.e. Q12)

    Anecdotal

    Scientific/academic literature (often connected to

    complementary study areas) Who is responsible for employees optimal performance?

  • 7/31/2019 Employee Engagement Doug

    5/27

    Employee Engagement Employee Engagement exists when the employee feels:

    Physically

    Intellectually

    Emotionally

    attached to their work (Kahn,1990)

    Work lifework and personal well being

    The extent that an employee is psychologically present inan organization role.

    Values, match, and fit.

  • 7/31/2019 Employee Engagement Doug

    6/27

    Some Research Claims for Employee Engagement Employee engagement research claims that it

    Predicts organizational and financial success throughtask and job motivation and organizational

    commitment. Increases with positive measures:

    Workload (reasonably)

    Control

    Rewards and recognitions

    Community and social support Perceived fairness

    Values fit

    Burnout is defined as negative

    measurements in these areas.

  • 7/31/2019 Employee Engagement Doug

    7/27

    Engaged Employees

    30% (Engaged)

    54% (Not Engaged)

    16% (Actively disengaged)

  • 7/31/2019 Employee Engagement Doug

    8/27

    12 Things Important to EmployeesFrom Gallups Q12:

    1. Knowing whats Expected

    2. Having the Right Materials & Equipment

    3. Opportunity to Do What I Do Best

    4. Recognition & Praise

    5. Caring for Me as a Person

    6. Encourages Development

  • 7/31/2019 Employee Engagement Doug

    9/27

    12 Important Thingscont.

    7. My opinion Counts

    8. Connection with Mission of Organization

    9. Co Workers Committed to Quality Work10. I have a Best Friend at Work

    11. Someone Has talked with Me About my

    Progress12. Opportunities to Learn and Grow

  • 7/31/2019 Employee Engagement Doug

    10/27

    Thoughtful Questions What are your expectations of work?

    Self Reflection Questions:(on a scale of 1-10, rate yourself on each question)

    I get up each day excited about going to work

    I like the contribution I make beyond what I get

    from it

    Work fits with my values

  • 7/31/2019 Employee Engagement Doug

    11/27

    UMKCs Previous Attempts to Measure

    Employee Engagement Workplace of Choice surveys

    To all UMKC employees

    Participation and results organized by department

    Worker satisfaction surveys Division of Administration and Finance

    Focus groups of employees for various departmentsand levels of the organization

    Workplace of choice committee IDP story demonstrated lack of trust and fear of

    sharing

  • 7/31/2019 Employee Engagement Doug

    12/27

    New Collaborations and a Broader Definition

    UM Board of Curators desire to conduct employeeengagement surveys with all employees

    UMKC HR accepted role to lead the first System effort

    UM System

    System Human Resources ALDP and UM Columbia Ph.D. student (Jill Hermsen)

    UMKC Campus

    UMKC Human Resources

    Student Affairs School of Art and Sciences (?)

    School of Education

  • 7/31/2019 Employee Engagement Doug

    13/27

    Pilot Project Project scope was outlined in a management document

    Theoretical and Practical research

    Survey development

    Proposed plan: Plan- Do- Check- Act Pre- survey

    Conduct focus groups with results

    Intervention workshops

    Post- survey Embed in the culture (institutionalize)

    Routinely checking (survey on anniversary)

    Continual training offerings

    Leadership awareness

  • 7/31/2019 Employee Engagement Doug

    14/27

    Blending All the Pieces Together

    Organizational behavior/ popular literature

    Employee needs to feel challenged Not Threatened

    Psychological contract

    Emotional vs. rational Academic literature:

    Measurement of Work engagement:

    Engaged vs. Burnout

    Vigor vs. Exhaustion Dedication vs. Cynicism

    Absorption vs. [Detachment]

  • 7/31/2019 Employee Engagement Doug

    15/27

    Survey Instrument Components

    Themes (Hermsen)

    1. Career Support

    I have opportunities to develop further skills in my career There are clear performance criteria outlined for my job

    I receive feedback on my performance.

    2. Recognition of Competence

    I am given recognition for my contributions.

    I have the authority to make decisions

  • 7/31/2019 Employee Engagement Doug

    16/27

    Survey Instrument Components cont.

    3. Intra Departmental Relations

    I have good relationships with colleagues in my unit.

    Turnover is NOT a problem in my unit.

    There is strong leadership in my unit. I have a best friend at work

    4. Working Conditions

    My unit receives adequate resources.

    I am satisfied with my salary.

    5. External Relations

    I have a good relationship with faculty.

  • 7/31/2019 Employee Engagement Doug

    17/27

    Survey Instrument Components cont.6. Job fit

    My work utilizes my full abilities.

    I feel competent and fully able to handle my job.

    My job and I are well matched.

    7. Role fit I like the identity my job gives me.

    My job fits how I see myself.

    8. Social Support

    My immediate supervisor goes out of his/her wayto do things to make my job easier.

    It is easy to talk with my immediate supervisor.

    My immediate supervisor can be relied on

    when things get tough at work.

  • 7/31/2019 Employee Engagement Doug

    18/27

    Survey Instrument Components cont.

    9. Job Satisfaction

    I enjoy working in my position.

    I have the trust and confidence of my colleagues.

    Compared to my peers of similar experience and skills,my salary compensation is fair.

    10. Work Engagement

    At my work, I feel bursting with energy.

    I am enthusiastic about my job. I get carried away when I am working.

    My job inspires me.

    I am proud of the work that I do.

  • 7/31/2019 Employee Engagement Doug

    19/27

    What the Academic Literature Yields to Help Us

    Employee Engagement

    Meaningfulness

    Safety

    Availability

    (Kahn, 1990)

  • 7/31/2019 Employee Engagement Doug

    20/27

    Reasons Cited as Why Employees Leave

    The job and/or workplace does not live up toexpectations

    Mismatch between job and worker

    Too little coaching and feedback

    Too few growth and advancement opportunities

    Feeling devalued and unrecognized

    Stress from overwork and work-life imbalance Loss of trust and confidence in senior leaders

    Branham (2005). 7 Hidden reasons employees leave.

  • 7/31/2019 Employee Engagement Doug

    21/27

    What Did Your Former Company Do Poorly?

    Poor management

    Lack of career growth and advancement opportunities

    Poor communications (top-down)

    Pay inequities and ineffective performance appraisals Lack of recognition

    Poor senior leadership

    Lack of training

    Excessive workload

    Lack of tools and resources Lack of teamwork

    Branham (2005).

  • 7/31/2019 Employee Engagement Doug

    22/27

    The J.M Smucker Company

    A simple code:

    Listen with your full attention

    Look for the good in others

    Have a sense of humor- but not at the expense of others

    And, say thank you for a good well done

    Result:

    By 2005, their stock had a 100 percent return over the pastfive years.

    3 percent voluntary turnover

  • 7/31/2019 Employee Engagement Doug

    23/27

    Recommendations

    Start with engaged people; Hire well First look inside

    Be clear and accurate

    Integrity first

    We can teach skills easier than Integrity Commit to Coaching and Feedback

    Performance Management

    Hold leaders accountable

    Clear expectations

    Commit to their Careers, not just your own Overall career development

    Internal pathways

    Succession planning

    Training

  • 7/31/2019 Employee Engagement Doug

    24/27

    Recommendations cont.

    Rewards and Recognition Its not only about the money

    Formal and Informal

    Genuine appreciation

    Work/Life Balance Care

    Flexibility when possible

    Encourage positive relationships

    Have some fun

    Be Trustworthy Honor commitments

    Trust them and their solutions

    Detect their value

    Give up control to gain control

  • 7/31/2019 Employee Engagement Doug

    25/27

    Recommendations cont.

    Support Meaningful work

    Value connection

    Fit

    Make it Safe

    Let them express their uniqueness

    Support their Availability

    Reasonable expectations

    Appropriate resources

  • 7/31/2019 Employee Engagement Doug

    26/27

    Concluding Questions

    Why do we tolerate personal incompetence in

    managers more than we would financial

    malfeasance?

    We lose more from interpersonal incompetence!

    What three qualities are essential for producing

    optimal employee performance?

    Uniqueness Service

    Community

  • 7/31/2019 Employee Engagement Doug

    27/27

    Bibliography First, Break All the Rules: What the World's Greatest Managers Do Differently. (Buckingham and

    Coffman, 1999).

    The Power of Full Engagement. (Loehr and Schwartz, 2003)

    12 Elements of Great Managing. (Wagner and Harter, 2006).

    Engagement is Not Enough. (Ayers, 2006).

    7 Hidden Reasons Employees Leave. (Branham, 2005).

    The psychological conditions of meaningfulness, safety and availability and the engagement of thehuman spirit at work.Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology. 77. (May, Gilson, andHarter, 2004).

    Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement.Journal of Managerial Psychology. 12(7).(Saks, 2006).

    Measurements of work engagement with a short questionnaire.Educational and PsychologicalMeasurements. 66(4). (Schaufeli and Bakker, 2006).

    Hardwiring Excellence. (Studer, 2003).

    The One Thing You Need to Know. (Buckingham, 2005).

    Resonant Leadership. (Boyatzis and McKee, 2005).

    Good to Great. (Collins, 2001).

    Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work..The Academy ofManagement Journal, 33, 692-724. (Kahn, 1990)