EMMA 2 Public Launch 20 th April 2006 Malpensa

Integrated Project of theSixth Framework Programme,

Priority 1.4: Aeronautics and Space,

sponsored by EC, DG TRENContract FP6-503192

Internet: http://www.dlr.de/emma

EUROPEAN AIRPORT MOVEMENT MANAGEMENT BY A-SMGCS, Part 2

EMMA 2 Public Launch20th April 2006

Malpensa

A. Nuzzo, ENAV S.p.A.

G. d’Auria, SELEX Sistemi Integrati

Mal

pens

a, 2

0th A

pril

2006

EMMA 2 Public Launch 2


SMR

Malpensa before EMMA

Surveillance:Apron •SMR Based Surveillance

•Apron Area Excluded

Apron

Apron

APP Radars

Mal

pens

a, 2

0th A

pril

2006




Surveillance:Apron

Surveillance:Labelling

•Arriving Flights: Automatic Labelling

•Departing flights: No Automatic LabellingSMR

APP Radars

Mal

pens

a, 2

0th A

pril

2006



SMRAPP Radars


Surveillance:Apron


Surveillance:Vehicles

•Localization in maneuvering area only•No identification

Mal

pens

a, 2

0th A

pril

2006



SMRAPP Radars


Surveillance:Apron



Control

•Basic Surface Conflict Alert

Mal

pens

a, 2

0th A

pril

2006



Malpensa: The EMMA Solution

Surveillance:Apron



Control

Multilateration

TWR/ACC Integration/Multilateration

Advanced Vehicle Management System

Enhanced Surface Conflict Alert

Mal

pens

a, 2

0th A

pril

2006





Surveillance:Apron

Multilateration

Surface Conflict AlertControl

ADAM - ADvanced Airport Multilateration System


•Selective Interrogation replies DF4/5/20/21 RX1

RX2

Target

RX1

RX2

Target

RX1

RX2

TargetRX3

RX1

RX2

TargetRX3

MLAT is based on the TDOA principle, the Time Difference of Arrival between the “arrivals” of one transponder’s signal received at several receivers

•Based on Spontaneous Squitters (DF11/17/18)

Mal

pens

a, 2

0th A

pril

2006





Surveillance:Apron

Multilateration

TWR/ACC Integration



ADAM - ADvanced Airport Multilateration System

•Configuration

•10 RX

•2 TX 1030 interrogators

•2 1090 TX Synchronisers


•ADS-B ES Data Extraction:

•Surface Position

•Airborne Position

•Airborne Velocity

•Aircraft Identification

•Operational Status

Mal

pens

a, 2

0th A

pril

2006





Surveillance:Apron

Multilateration

TWR/ACC Integration




Sector 1Sector 2

Sector 3

Sector 4

Sector 6

Sector 7

Sector 5

ACC

Apron Services

TWR Ground

TWR Air

TWR Ground

Airport

Area of Overlap

Sector 1Sector 2

Sector 3

Sector 4

Sector 6

Sector 7

Sector 5

Apron Services

TWR Ground

TWR Air

TWR Ground

ACC/TWRIntegration

Airport: Sector of ACC

•Shared Flight Plan ACC •Power on Flight Plan

Mal

pens

a, 2

0th A

pril

2006





Control

Surveillance:Apron

•Aircraft Mode 3A/C Code and Call Sign received through MLAT infrastructure

•Correlation of Mode 3A/C Code with Call Sign

37443744

AZA0203

•Flight Plans with Call Signs received trough TWR/ACC integration

3744Mode A codeCallsign


Mal

pens

a, 2

0th A

pril

2006





Control

Surveillance:Apron

Call Sign taken directly from MULTILAT if:

• Flight Plan not available• No Correlation between Transponder Code and Flight Plan

37443744

AZA0203Surveillance:Labelling

Mal

pens

a, 2

0th A

pril

2006





Surveillance:Apron

Multilateration

TWR/ACC Integration




AVMS - Advanced Vehicle Management System

•Movement area: MULTILAT

•Dual Data Link architecture:

VehicleType 1

WLAN MLAT

Movement area

VehicleType 2

WLAN

Apron

Apron

•Apron Area: WLAN

Mal

pens

a, 2

0th A

pril

2006





Surveillance:Apron

Multilateration

TWR/ACC Integration




E-SCA – Enhanced Surface Conflict Alert•Full configuration flexibility

•Selective enabling for conflict class•Selective enabling for area•Selective management of warnings and alarms

Mal

pens

a, 2

0th A

pril

2006





Surveillance:Apron

Multilateration

TWR/ACC Integration




•Two sessions held at NLR – Amsterdam for tuning the system

E-SCA – Enhanced Surface Conflict Alert

Mal

pens

a, 2

0th A

pril

2006



MXP Validation TrialsMXP Validation TrialsReal Time SimulationsReal Time Simulations

A-SMGCS onA-SMGCS on

A-SMGCS offA-SMGCS off

Res

po

nse

tim

eR

esp

on

se t

ime

00

11

22

33

44

55

66

77SAFETYSAFETY

Reaction Time for alert Reaction Time for alert situations occurrences is situations occurrences is reduced when A-SMGCS reduced when A-SMGCS

Level II functionality is in Level II functionality is in useuse

To demonstrate or validate that the To demonstrate or validate that the AdvancedAdvanced system (including the system (including the E-SCA tool) is preferred over the E-SCA tool) is preferred over the BaselineBaseline system by verifying ad-hoc system by verifying ad-hoc

HypothesisHypothesis

Mal

pens

a, 2

0th A

pril

2006






Res

po

nse

tim

eR

esp

on

se t

ime

00

11

22

33

44

55

66

77SAFETYSAFETY

6464

6666

6868

7070

7272

7474

7676

7878

11 22visibility visibility

SU

sco

reS

U s

core

System Usability (HMI)System Usability (HMI)

The Controllers accepted A-SMGCS Level II The Controllers accepted A-SMGCS Level II related tools and procedurerelated tools and procedure

Mal

pens

a, 2

0th A

pril

2006






Res

po

nse

tim

eR

esp

on

se t

ime

00

11

22

33

44

55

66

77SAFETYSAFETY

visibilityvisibility00

101020203030404050506060707080809090

100100

11 22

Rat

ing

Rat

ing

Workload (NASA TLX)Workload (NASA TLX)

6464

6666

6868

7070

7272

7474

7676

7878


SU

sco

reS

U s

core


Controllers workload shall Controllers workload shall decrease when A-SMGCS decrease when A-SMGCS Level II functionality is in Level II functionality is in

useuse

Mal

pens

a, 2

0th A

pril

2006






Res

po

nse

tim

eR

esp

on

se t

ime

00

11

22

33

44

55

66

77SAFETYSAFETY

visibilityvisibility00

101020203030404050506060707080809090

100100

11 22

Rat

ing

Rat

ing

Workload (NASA TLX)Workload (NASA TLX)

6464

6666

6868

7070

7272

7474

7676

7878


SU

sco

reS

U s

core


11

22

33

44

55

66

11 22visibilityvisibility

Rat

ing

(1

- 5)

Rat

ing

(1

- 5)

Situation AwarenessSituation Awareness

Situation Awareness of Situation Awareness of controllerscontrollers

is increased when A-SMGCS Level is increased when A-SMGCS Level II functionality is in useII functionality is in use

Mal

pens

a, 2

0th A

pril

2006



INDICATORSINDICATORS EXAMPLES OF QUESTIONNAIRE ITEMSEXAMPLES OF QUESTIONNAIRE ITEMS MXP Mean ValuesMXP Mean Values

SafetySafety When I will use A-SMGCS it will help me to operate safer.When I will use A-SMGCS it will help me to operate safer. Answers from 1 (disagreement) through 6 (agreement)Answers from 1 (disagreement) through 6 (agreement)

4.74.7

CapacityCapacity

How do you assess impact of A-SMGCS on the RWY Departure ThroughputHow do you assess impact of A-SMGCS on the RWY Departure Throughput??

2 cases: Vis. Cond. 1 and Vis. Cond. 2 - Answers: positive, negative, no impact.2 cases: Vis. Cond. 1 and Vis. Cond. 2 - Answers: positive, negative, no impact.

If positive, how do you estimate the benefits compared with the existing baseline?If positive, how do you estimate the benefits compared with the existing baseline?

2 cases: Vis. Cond. 1 and Vis. Cond. 2 Answers: 0-5%, 5-10%, 10-15%, 15-20%, more2 cases: Vis. Cond. 1 and Vis. Cond. 2 Answers: 0-5%, 5-10%, 10-15%, 15-20%, more

Vis. 1Vis. 1

No Impact: No Impact: 96.9%96.9%

Vis. 2Vis. 2

Positive: Positive: 62.5%62.5%

0-5%: 0-5%: 90%90%

EfficiencyEfficiency

How do you assess impact of A-SMGCS on the Taxi-in DelayHow do you assess impact of A-SMGCS on the Taxi-in Delay??

2 cases: Vis. Cond. 1 and Vis. Cond. 2 - Answers: positive, negative, no impact.2 cases: Vis. Cond. 1 and Vis. Cond. 2 - Answers: positive, negative, no impact.

If positive, how do you estimate the benefits compared with the existing baseline?If positive, how do you estimate the benefits compared with the existing baseline?

2 cases: Vis. Cond. 1 and Vis. Cond. 2 Answers: 0-5%, 5-10%, 10-15%, 15-20%, more2 cases: Vis. Cond. 1 and Vis. Cond. 2 Answers: 0-5%, 5-10%, 10-15%, 15-20%, more

Vis. 1Vis. 1

No Impact: No Impact: 87.5%87.5%

Vis. 2Vis. 2

Positive: Positive: 71.9%71.9%

0-5%: 91,30-5%: 91,3%%

AcceptanceAcceptance

- I think A-SMGCS is easy to use- I think A-SMGCS is easy to use- Some relevant information is frequently missing in the A-SMGCS displaySome relevant information is frequently missing in the A-SMGCS display- With the A-SMGCS it is easier to detect runway incursionsWith the A-SMGCS it is easier to detect runway incursions- With the A-SMGCS it is easier to detect aircraft on the ApronWith the A-SMGCS it is easier to detect aircraft on the Apron

Answers from 1 (disagreement) through 6 (agreement)Answers from 1 (disagreement) through 6 (agreement)

4.14.1

2.72.7

4.64.6

4.34.3

UsabilityUsability

- I found the various functions in this system were well integratedI found the various functions in this system were well integrated- I think I would need the support of a technical person to be able to use this systemI think I would need the support of a technical person to be able to use this system

Answers from 1 (disagreement) through 5 (agreement)Answers from 1 (disagreement) through 5 (agreement)

4.24.2

1.21.2

5 typologies of debriefing questionnaires submitted to the ATCo after every session5 typologies of debriefing questionnaires submitted to the ATCo after every session

MXP Validation TrialsMXP Validation TrialsShadow ModeShadow Mode

Mal

pens

a, 2

0th A

pril

2006



EMMA Evolution

ADS B In

EFS

Route Planner

ADS B Out

CPDLCClearances & Guidance

Mal

pens

a, 2

0th A

pril

2006



EMMA Evolution

Meteo Data

Flight Data

Surveillance DataAircraft Category

Surveillance Data

Light Status

Segment StatusAirport Category

Airport Category

Runway Status

Flight PlanAircraft Category

Surveillance

Replanning

Divergencewarning

Runway Planning

Taxi Planner

ConformanceCheck

ADS B In

EFS

Route Planner

ADS B Out


Mal

pens

a, 2

0th A

pril

2006



EMMA Evolution

ADS B In

EFS

Route Planner

ADS B Out


TWR Air

ACCMXP

Sector 1 Sector 2

Sector 3

Sector 4

Sector 6

Sector 7

Sector 5

•Electronic Flight Strips replacing paper strips

•Electronic Flight Strips supporting a more general Data Sharing:•extending Data Sharing from Boundary towards the Apron Services:

•TWR•GND•Apron Management•Airport Operator•Aircraft Operators

Area of Data Sharing

Extended Area of Data Sharing

ACC/TWRIntegrationApron Services

TWR Ground

TWR Ground

Mal

pens

a, 2

0th A

pril

2006



EMMA Evolution

ADS B In

EFS

Route Planner

ADS B Out


•ADS B using Extended Squitter technology and MLAT infrastructure

Mal

pens

a, 2

0th A

pril

2006



EMMA Evolution

ADS B In

EFS

Route Planner

ADS B Out


Mal

pens

a, 2

0th A

pril

2006



EMMA Evolution

ADS B In

EFS

Route Planner

ADS B Out


Cleared for start up


Mal

pens

a, 2

0th A

pril

2006



EMMA Evolution

ADS B In

EFS

Route Planner

ADS B Out




WILCO

WILCO

Mal

pens

a, 2

0th A

pril

2006



The Way Ahead

Test Aircraft

Real Time Simulations

Traffic of Opportunity

Test Van

Mal

pens

a, 2

0th A

pril

2006



For More information:

Antonio Nuzzo: [email protected], +39 06 8166733

Giuliano d‘Auria: [email protected], +39 06 4150 4448

EMMA 2 Public Launch 20 th April 2006 Malpensa

Documents

Transcript of EMMA 2 Public Launch 20 th April 2006 Malpensa