Electronic Eau Claire Conversation E2C2
description
Transcript of Electronic Eau Claire Conversation E2C2
Electronic
Eau Claire
Conversation E2C2
Who
is lis
teni
ng? 358 people have read
Electronic Eau Claire Conversation.
Who
is g
iving
fe
edba
ck? 68 people wrote or
supported priorities. That's 3.4 hours of public comment @ three minutes per priorities.
Age
Dem
ogra
phics
Economic Development
Building Inspection
Planning and Zoning
Other Community Organizations
Recreation
Snow and Ice Control
Parks and Trails
Street maintenance
Library
Health
Transit
General Government
Fire and Rescue
Police
Capital Projects
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160
Budgeting By Priorities Results
CitizensResponseCurrentSpending
Dollars allocated of $500
Prio
ritie
s
Map
District 1 = 10 responsesDistrict 2 = 9, District 3 =10
District 5 = 9, District 5 = 20Outside of City = 9
Fire andRescue
Police
CapitalProjects
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160
Budgeting by Priorities Results
CurrentSpendingDistrict 1District 2District 3District 4District 5Outside EC
Dollars allocated of $500
EconomicDevelopment
Recreation
Snow andIce Control
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Budgeting by Priorities Results
CurrentSpendingDistrict 1District 2District 3District 4District 5Outside EC
Dollars allocated of $500
BuildingInspection
Planningand Zoning
OtherCommunity
Organizations
0 5 10 15 20 25
Budgeting by Priorities Results
CurrentSpendingDistrict 1District 2District 3District 4District 5Outside EC
Dollars allocated of $500
Parks andTrails
Streetmaintenance
Library
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
Budgeting by Priorities Results
CurrentSpendingDistrict 1District 2District 3District 4District 5Outside EC
Dollars allocated of $500
Health
Transit
GeneralGovernment
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Budgeting by Priorities Results
CurrentSpendingDistrict 1District 2District 3District 4District 5Outside EC
Dollars allocated of $500
Visit
ors t
o E2
C2
67 participants (18.7%)358 visitorsPeak Democracy normal 10 – 15%
Satis
fact
ion
Surv
eyYes = 56 (88%)No = 6 (12%)
Satis
fact
ion
Surv
ey
All “
no” c
omm
ents
error in using 50 cents. Site was difficult to navigate
with iPad and iPhone; ended up
having to enter information on
desktop. It was largely inaccessible to
me as a blind computer user
who reads with a screen reader.
It will get boring fast. I don't
feel compelled to come back
and use it again. It doesn't break thins (sic) down
into projects I may or may not
agree with.
Satis
fact
ion
Surv
ey
Sele
cted
“yes
” co
mm
ents
(17)
Very easy to navigate, allowed me to see percentage and make changes if I wanted.
It's nice to feel like you have a say. Hopefully it will matter. It was user friendly
and I felt like I had a say.