Elec Digest Valles and Labo

3
VALLES vs COMELEC FACTS: Rosalind Lopez was born on May 16, 1934 in Western Australia, to the spouses, Telesforo Ybasco, a Filipino citizen and native of Daet, Camarines Norte, and Theresa Marquez, an Australian. In 1949, at the age of fifteen, she left Australia and came to settle in the Philippines. In 1952, she was married to Leopoldo Lopez, a Filipino citizen. Since then, she has continuously participated in the electoral process not only as a voter but as a candidate, as well. She served as Provincial Board Member of the Sangguniang Panlalawigan of Davao Oriental. In 1992, she ran for and was elected governor of Davao Oriental. Subsequently, several other petitions were filed against Lopez, all of them questioning her citizenship. One of these petitions were filed by herein petitioner, Valles. However like all the other petitions, this was dismissed on based on the following grounds: 1. Her father, Telesforo Ybasco, is a Filipino citizen, and by virtue of the principle of jus sanguinis she was a Filipino citizen under the 1987 Philippine Constitution; 2. She was married to a Filipino, thereby making her also a Filipino citizen ipso jure under Section 4 of Commonwealth Act 473; 3. And that, she renounced her Australian citizenship on January 15, 1992 before the Department of Immigration and Ethnic Affairs of Australia and her Australian passport was accordingly cancelled as certified to by the Australian Embassy in Manila; Petitioner, on the other hand, maintains that the private respondent is an Australian citizen, placing reliance on the admitted facts that: 1. In 1988, private respondent registered herself with the Bureau of Immigration as an Australian national 2. She applied for the issuance of an Immigrant Certificate of Residence (ICR), and 3. She was issued Australian Passport ISSUE: W/N Lopez is a Filipino citizen, and is qualified to run for public office (YES) HELD: The Philippine law on citizenship adheres to the principle of jus sanguinis. Thereunder, a child follows the nationality or citizenship of the parents regardless of the place of his/her birth, as opposed to the doctrine of jus soli which determines nationality or citizenship on the basis of place of birth. Private respondent Rosalind Ybasco Lopez was born on May 16, 1934. Historically, this was a year before the 1935 Constitution took into effect and at that time, what served as the Constitution of the Philippines were the principal organic acts by which the United States governed the country The Philippine Bill of 1902 defined Philippine citizens as: all inhabitants of the Philippine Islands continuing to reside therein who were Spanish

description

Digest

Transcript of Elec Digest Valles and Labo

VALLES vs COMELECFACTS: Rosalind Lopez was born on May 16, 1934 in Western Australia, to the spouses, Telesforo bas!o, a "ilipino !itizen and nati#e of $aet, %a&arines 'orte, and Theresa Mar(uez, an Australian) *n 1949, at the a+e of fifteen, she left Australia and !a&e to settle in the ,hilippines)*n 19-., she was &arried to Leopoldo Lopez, a "ilipino !itizen) /in!e then, she has !ontinuously parti!ipated in the ele!toral pro!ess not only as a #oter but as a !andidate, as well) /he ser#ed as ,ro#in!ial 0oard Me&ber of the /an++unian+ ,anlalawi+an of $a#ao 1riental) *n 199., she ran for and was ele!ted +o#ernor of $a#ao 1riental)/ubse(uently, se#eral other petitions were filed a+ainst Lopez, all of the& (uestionin+ her !itizenship) 1ne of these petitions were filed by herein petitioner, 2alles)3owe#er li4e all the other petitions, this was dis&issed on based on the followin+ +rounds5 1) 3er father, Telesforo bas!o, is a "ilipino !itizen, and by #irtue of the prin!iple of jus sanguinis she was a "ilipino !itizen under the 1967 ,hilippine %onstitution8 .) /he was &arried to a "ilipino, thereby &a4in+ her also a "ilipino !itizen ipso jure under /e!tion4 of %o&&onwealth A!t 47383) And that, she renoun!ed her Australian !itizenship on 9anuary 1-, 199. before the $epart&entof *&&i+ration and :thni! Affairs of Australia and her Australian passport was a!!ordin+ly !an!elled as !ertified to by the Australian :&bassy in Manila8,etitioner, on the other hand, &aintains that the pri#ate respondent is an Australian !itizen, pla!in+ relian!e on the ad&itted fa!ts that51) *n 1966, pri#ate respondent re+istered herself with the 0ureau of *&&i+ration as an Australian national.) /he applied for the issuan!e of an *&&i+rant %ertifi!ate of Residen!e ;*%R