Effects of dam’s dry period length on heifer development H. D. Norman and J. L. Hutchison*

1
Effects of dam’s dry period length on heifer development H. D. Norman and J. L. Hutchison* Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, Agricultural Research Center, USDA, Beltsville, MD 20705-2350 Abstr. M66 201 1 INTRODUCTION Considerable research has been done to determine effects of dry period on cow’s later performance. Few studies have looked at dam’s dry period on heifer development. However, over 50% of in utero calf weight gain occurs during the last 2 months of gestation. OBJECTIVES To investigate effect of dam’s days dry (DD) on: ! Calving difficulty (CD), scored 1-5 (higher score=more difficulty) ! Stillbirth rate (SB), calf livability to 48 hours ! Age at first breeding of heifer calf (AFB) ! Survival to first calving of heifer calf (SURV1), 0=no first lactation, 1=had a first lactation DATA & METHODS ! Holstein calving and breeding records from January 1997 through December 2010 ! Data edits Dam’s first calving after January 1997 Dam’s calving date within 10 d of expected calving date For AFB and SURV1, heifer’s birth date before January 2008 to allow time for first lactation ! Dam’s DD categorized into 12 groups (0-30, 31-35, 36-40, …, 66-70, 71- 80, 81-90, 91-120 d) ! Linear fixed-effects models Same model for CD and SB Dam’s calving herd-year, dam’s calving year-state-month, parity of dam, calf sex, and dam’s DD category Gestation length (GL) and milk yield were added to CD model to see if effect remained AFB = heifer’s breeding herd-year, heifer’s breeding year-state-month, and dam’s DD category SURV1 = dam’s calving herd-year, dam’s calving year-state-month, parity of dam, heifer parent RESULTS DD group Dam’s DD Number of records CD SB AFB 1 SURVI 1 0-30 13,487 4,506 549 6,147 2 31-35 16,227 6,674 811 7,649 3 36-40 42,530 18,904 2,402 18,505 4 41-45 91,965 40,019 4,631 37,070 5 46-50 164,562 64,722 7,368 64,389 6 51-55 241,816 84,854 8,809 95,568 7 56-60 263,659 83,705 7,424 104,602 8 61-65 188,091 54,125 4,313 73,291 9 66-70 91,265 24,148 1,829 34,664 10 71-80 62,231 15,745 1,561 24,259 11 81-90 30,804 7,602 876 11,924 12 91-120 41,207 11,106 1,250 15,684 Total 1,247,844 416,110 41,823 493,752 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 Dam’s DD group Stillbirth, % ! Dam’s stillbirth 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1.20 1.25 1.30 1.35 1.40 1.45 CD model GL & milk included in model Dam’s DD group CD score ! Dam’s calving difficulty 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 455 457 459 461 463 465 Dam’s DD group Age at first breeding, d ! Heifer’s age at first breeding 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 SURV1 model Stillborn calves removed Dam’s DD group Survival to first calving, % ! Heifer’s survival to first calving 1 Small number of records for AFB due to heifer breeding records not stored until 2003 and reporting is minimal DISCUSSION ! Dam’s calving difficulty Increased linearly as dam’s DD increased until 66 d and then leveled off Difference between DD categories were all significantly different (P < 0.0001) when compared to 56-60 and 61-65 DD, although differences were small ranging 0.11 between 0- 30 and 91-120 DD When GL and milk were included in the model, calving difficulty still increased as dam’s DD increased ! Dam’s stillbirth Optimal at 51-65 DD Short (≤35 d) and long (≥71 d) DD were detrimental to calf survival ! Heifer’s age at first breeding Increased 5 d when dam had 0-30 DD compared to 56-60 DD Differences were significant between 0-30 DD and 56-60 DD (P < 0.05) but not significant between 56-60 and 91-120 DD ! Heifer’s survival to first calving Decreased 2.9 and 3.3 percentage points when dam had 0-30 DD and 1.1 and 1.6 percentage points for 91- 120 DD compared to 56-60 and 61-65 DD Differences were significant between 0-30 and 56-60 DD (P < 0.0001) and between 56-60 and 91- 120 DD (P < 0.05) When stillborn calves were removed, heifers were still more likely to survive to first lactation when their dam’s had a 56-65 DD http://aipl.arsusda.gov CONCLUSION Dam’s dry period length is associated with calf and heifer survivability. These results support avoiding the use of extreme dry period lengths, either short (≤35 d) or long (≥71 d), to maximize calf survival.

description

Effects of dam’s dry period length on heifer development H. D. Norman and J. L. Hutchison* Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, Agricultural Research Center, USDA, Beltsville, MD 20705-2350. 2011. Abstr . M66. INTRODUCTION - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Effects of dam’s dry period length on heifer development H. D. Norman and J. L. Hutchison*

Page 1: Effects of dam’s dry period length on heifer development H. D. Norman and J. L. Hutchison*

Effects of dam’s dry period length on heifer development

H. D. Norman and J. L. Hutchison*Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, Agricultural Research Center, USDA, Beltsville, MD 20705-

2350Abstr. M66 2011

INTRODUCTIONConsiderable research has been done to determine effects of dry period on cow’s later performance. Few studies have looked at dam’s dry period on heifer development. However, over 50% of in utero calf weight gain occurs during the last 2 months of gestation.

OBJECTIVESTo investigate effect of dam’s days dry (DD) on:

! Calving difficulty (CD), scored 1-5 (higher score=more difficulty)

! Stillbirth rate (SB), calf livability to 48 hours

! Age at first breeding of heifer calf (AFB)

! Survival to first calving of heifer calf (SURV1), 0=no first lactation, 1=had a first lactation

DATA & METHODS! Holstein calving and breeding records from

January 1997 through December 2010

! Data edits Dam’s first calving after January 1997 Dam’s calving date within 10 d of

expected calving date For AFB and SURV1, heifer’s birth date

before January 2008 to allow time for first lactation

! Dam’s DD categorized into 12 groups (0-30, 31-35, 36-40, …, 66-70, 71-80, 81-90, 91-120 d)

! Linear fixed-effects models Same model for CD and SB

Dam’s calving herd-year, dam’s calving year-state-month, parity of dam, calf sex, and dam’s DD category

Gestation length (GL) and milk yield were added to CD model to see if effect remained

AFB = heifer’s breeding herd-year, heifer’s breeding year-state-month, and dam’s DD category

SURV1 = dam’s calving herd-year, dam’s calving year-state-month, parity of dam, heifer parent average DPR, and dam’s DD category

RESULTS

DD group Dam’s DD

Number of records

CD SB AFB1 SURVI1 0-30 13,487 4,506 549 6,1472 31-35 16,227 6,674 811 7,6493 36-40 42,530 18,904 2,402 18,5054 41-45 91,965 40,019 4,631 37,0705 46-50 164,562 64,722 7,368 64,3896 51-55 241,816 84,854 8,809 95,5687 56-60 263,659 83,705 7,424 104,6028 61-65 188,091 54,125 4,313 73,2919 66-70 91,265 24,148 1,829 34,66410 71-80 62,231 15,745 1,561 24,25911 81-90 30,804 7,602 876 11,92412 91-120 41,207 11,106 1,250 15,684Total 1,247,844 416,110 41,823 493,752

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 122.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

4.5

Dam’s DD group

Sti

llb

irth

, %

! Dam’s stillbirth

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 121.20

1.25

1.30

1.35

1.40

1.45

CD modelGL & milk included in model

Dam’s DD group

CD

sco

re

! Dam’s calving difficulty

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12455

457

459

461

463

465

Dam’s DD group

Ag

e a

t fi

rst

bre

ed

ing

, d

! Heifer’s age at first breeding

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 1264

65

66

67

68

69

70

71

SURV1 model Stillborn calves removed

Dam’s DD group

Su

rviv

al

to fi

rst

calv

ing

, %

! Heifer’s survival to first calving

1 Small number of records for AFB due to heifer breeding records not stored until 2003 and reporting is minimal

DISCUSSION! Dam’s calving difficulty

Increased linearly as dam’s DD increased until 66 d and then leveled off

Difference between DD categories were all significantly different (P < 0.0001) when compared to 56-60 and 61-65 DD, although differences were small ranging 0.11 between 0-30 and 91-120 DD

When GL and milk were included in the model, calving difficulty still increased as dam’s DD increased

! Dam’s stillbirth Optimal at 51-65 DD Short (≤35 d) and long (≥71 d) DD were

detrimental to calf survival

! Heifer’s age at first breeding Increased 5 d when dam had 0-30 DD

compared to 56-60 DD Differences were significant between 0-

30 DD and 56-60 DD (P < 0.05) but not significant between 56-60 and 91-120 DD

! Heifer’s survival to first calving Decreased 2.9 and 3.3 percentage points

when dam had 0-30 DD and 1.1 and 1.6 percentage points for 91-120 DD compared to 56-60 and 61-65 DD

Differences were significant between 0-30 and 56-60 DD (P < 0.0001) and between 56-60 and 91-120 DD (P < 0.05)

When stillborn calves were removed, heifers were still more likely to survive to first lactation when their dam’s had a 56-65 DD

http://aipl.arsusda.gov

CONCLUSIONDam’s dry period length is associated with calf and heifer survivability. These results support avoiding the use of extreme dry period lengths, either short (≤35 d) or long (≥71 d), to maximize calf survival.