Effect of local market access on diets consumption and nutitional indicators in ethiopia
-
Upload
externalevents -
Category
Education
-
view
116 -
download
1
Transcript of Effect of local market access on diets consumption and nutitional indicators in ethiopia
ETHIOPIAN DEVELOPMENT RESEARCH INSTITUTE
Rural roads, welfare and nutrition
David Stifel (Lafayette College) and Bart Minten (IFPRI)
1
Background
• Average calorie consumption 9% higher in last decade
• Poverty declined from 55% to 33% (1.9 USD per day)
• Stunting of children reduced from 57% to 40% (2000 – 2014)
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
2000 2005 2011
Kcal
/day
/ad
ult
eq
uiv
alen
t
cereals non-cereals
3
Background
• Important changes in Ethiopia in market access during that period
1996/1997 2010/2011
4
The Question:
What are the impacts of improved market access on household well-being and nutrition?
To what can we attribute these impacts?
5
Data
• Sample area selected purposefully
o Homogeneous region
o Except for transport costs
o Without a road
• Households’ circumstances differ because of different transport costs…
…not because of land characteristics, etc.
6
7
Market Access – Transport Costs
• Donkey costs (Birr/kg)
o Cost of renting donkey
o Weight donkey can carry
• Economic transport costs
o Include the opportunity cost of time
8
Household Per Capita Consumption & Market Access
0
50
010
00
15
00
20
00
25
00
Birr
/ pe
rson
0 20 40 60 80Transport Cost (Birr/kg)
Per Capita Household Consumption Food
Non-Food
9
Food Security
0.1
.2.3
Perc
ent o
f H
ouse
ho
lds
Least Remote Quintile 2 Quintile 3 Quintile 4 Most Remote
Worry Not Enough Food in Past 30 Days
1-2 Times 3-10 Times
10+ Times
10
Food Security0
.1.2
.3
Perc
ent o
f H
ouse
ho
lds
Least Remote Quintile 2 Quintile 3 Quintile 4 Most Remote
Ate Fewer Meals in Past 30 Days
1-2 Times 3-10 Times
10+ Times
0.1
.2.3
Perc
ent o
f H
ouse
ho
lds
Least Remote Quintile 2 Quintile 3 Quintile 4 Most Remote
Ate Smaller Meals in Past 30 Days
1-2 Times 3-10 Times
10+ Times
11
Dietary Diversity
01
23
45
6
Avera
ge
Num
ber
of F
ood
Gro
ups
0 20 40 60 80Transport Cost (Birr/kg)
All Household Members Chldren under age 5
Average Number of Food Groups in Household Diet
12
Child Stunting-6
-20
26
He
ight-
for-
Age
Z-s
core
0 20 40 60 80Transport Costs (Birr/Quintal)
bandwidth = .8
Stunting: HAZ < -2
• 36 percent stunted
• Statistically not different by remoteness
13
What can explain the relationship between market access and wellbeing?
1. Agricultural Production
2. Terms of trade
o Marketed surplus
o Purchased consumption items
14
Value of HH Agric Production
0
20
00
40
00
60
00
Birr
0 20 40 60 80Transport Cost (Birr/kg)
Total Production Cereals
Oilseeds Vegetables
Despite similarities in land productivity…
15
Household Marketed Surplus
0
20
00
40
00
60
00
Birr
0 20 40 60 80Transport Cost (Birr/kg)
Total Production Marketed Surplus
Own Consumption
16
Household Food Consumption & Market Access
0
50
010
00
15
00
20
00
25
00
Birr
/ pe
rson
0 20 40 60 80Transport Cost (Birr/kg)
Per Capita Food Consumption Purchased
Own-Consumption
17
Household Food Purchases
0
10
00
20
00
30
00
40
00
50
00
Birr
0 20 40 60 80Transport Cost (Birr/kg)
Total Food Purchases Meat
Beverages Cereals
Spices (incl salt & sugar)
18
Nutrition knowledge and its impact on children’s dietary diversity
19
Conclusions
Households with greater market access have…
• Greater consumption
• More food security
• Greater dietary diversity
20
Conclusions
These differences may be attributed to…
• Greater agricultural production
• Improved terms of trade that result in increased…o Marketed agricultural
surplus
o Purchased consumption goods
21
Conclusions
• But, no discernable effects on nutrition outcomes
• Why?o Number of food groups low for all households
o Food consumption alone is not enough to affect nutrition outcomes
o Limited access to clean water, sanitation & healthcare throughout the survey area
o Knowledge on nutrition impact, but more impact if closer to market