EDUCATION DIVISIONeducation.gov.mt/en/education/quality-assurance/Docu… · Web viewTable 23:...
Transcript of EDUCATION DIVISIONeducation.gov.mt/en/education/quality-assurance/Docu… · Web viewTable 23:...
MINISTRY FOR EDUCATION AND EMPLOYMENTDirectorate for Quality and Standards in EducationQuality Assurance Department
College NameSchool Name
Internal ReviewScholastic Year
20 / 20
School Contact DetailsName of Head of
School
Postal Address
Telephone/s
Web Address http://
Email Address
0
MINISTRY FOR EDUCATION AND EMPLOYMENTDirectorate for Quality and Standards in EducationQuality Assurance Department
The School Vision and Mission
School Vision
Replace this text with your school’s vision statement: A vision statement focuses on the future. It provides a broad and inspirational image of the
future the school seeks to create, presented in a sentence or short paragraph.
Mission Statement
Replace this text with your school’s mission statement: A mission statement focuses on the present. It describes who we are and what we do as a
school. It may include the core values of the school, the educational services provided, student and parental involvement, resources available and school achievements.
1
MINISTRY FOR EDUCATION AND EMPLOYMENTDirectorate for Quality and Standards in EducationQuality Assurance Department
School Context
State school class equivalent KG1 KG2 Yr1 Yr2 Yr3 Yr4 Yr5 Yr6
Total number of learners
No of refugees and asylum seekers
No of learners for whom Maltese is not their first language
No of learners with a statement of needs
Number of learners attending nurture group
Table 1: Learner Data (latest updates)
Staff information~ Total number
New Staff
Total number
New Staff
No of Assistant Heads No of regular Kindergarten Assistants
No of regular class teachers No of Supply Kindergarten Assistants
No of supply class teachers No of regular LSAs
No of peripatetic teachers No supply LSAs
No of complementary teachers No of Clerical Staff
No of Nurture Group staff No of Minor Staff
Number of staff members requesting a transfer at the end of the previous year
~ The total number of staff includes the number of staff new to the school.Table 2: Staff Data
2
MINISTRY FOR EDUCATION AND EMPLOYMENTDirectorate for Quality and Standards in EducationQuality Assurance Department
School Context
External support staff rendering service in the schoolTotal
numberTotal
number
Literacy support teacher Health and safety teacher
Maths support teacher Early intervention teacher
Head of Department (Assessment for Learning)
Other peripatetic teachers (e.g. for the hearing impaired)
Head of Department (Malta Writing Programme) Anti-bullying teacher
Head of Department (Literacy) Anti-substance abuse teacher
Counsellor Occupational therapist
Educational psychologist SEBD specialist
INCO Speech pathologist
Prefect of discipline
Psychotherapist
Social support worker
Social worker
Table 3: External support Staff Data
3
MINISTRY FOR EDUCATION AND EMPLOYMENTDirectorate for Quality and Standards in EducationQuality Assurance Department
School ContextFacilities and InitiativesArt Room Accessibility to learners with special needs
Chapel Comenius project
Computer Zone/Lab Green Flag
Drama room Health and Safety risk assessment
Food Lab/Kitchen Internet accessibility throughout the school
Guidance Room Potable water availability
Music Room School Behaviour Policy
Nurture Room School Council
Offices for SMT School Dress Code
Play Grounds School evacuation plan
PSD Rooms School Handbook
Resource Room/Stores School Magazine
School Gym School Newsletter
School Hall School Website
School Library Students’ clubs
Science Room/Lab Students’ Council
Secretary Office Teacher welfare committee
Staff Rooms Time allocated for departmental meetings
Tuck Shop / Canteen
Table 4: School Facilities and Initiatives: tick or insert amount as appropriate, add if necessary. Kindly indicate with * the rooms used for more than one purpose
4
MINISTRY FOR EDUCATION AND EMPLOYMENTDirectorate for Quality and Standards in EducationQuality Assurance Department
School Context
5
Attainment SheetYr4 Yr5 Yr6
/ Benchmark
Mean [average] in MathematicsFor year 4, 5 and 6
National Mean for Mathematics
Sectorial Mean for Mathematics
Mean [average] MalteseFor year 4, 5 and 6
National Mean for Maltese
Sectorial Mean for Maltese
Mean [average] EnglishFor year 4, 5 and 6
National Mean for English
Sectorial Mean for English
Mean [average] ScienceFor year 4, 5 and 6
National Mean for Science
Sectorial (State)Mean for Science
Table 5: Attainment Sheet: Add % mark as appropriate and add other subjects if necessary
Learners exempted from Benchmark examNumber of learners % of total
Mathematics
Maltese
English
Table 6: No of learners exempted from benchmark
Core competenciesYr1 Yr2 Yr3 Yr4
No students on core competenciesYR 1-4 Obtained from Literacy support unit
Table 7: Attainment Sheet: Add % mark as appropriate and add other subjects if necessary
MINISTRY FOR EDUCATION AND EMPLOYMENTDirectorate for Quality and Standards in EducationQuality Assurance Department
School evaluation and development processes
SDP Meetings timeline 20__-20__ Date TopicTerm 1 – 2 hour Meeting during school hoursTerm 2 – 2 hour Meeting during school hoursTerm 3 – 2 hour Meeting during school hoursTerm 3 – Full Day Meeting
Table 8: SDP meetings
CPD timeline 20__-20__ Date TopicTerm 1 – 2 hours after school hoursTerm 2 – 2 hours after school hoursTerm 3 – 2 hours after school hoursAlternative CPD
Table 9: CPD sessions
School Initiatives and resources used for School Development Planning 20__-20__
Virtual Learning Platform [e.g. Fronter] Newsletters
E Surveys Circulars
Regular group meetings Email/group mail
Questionnaires Web site
Parental meetings Assemblies
Open Days
Focus groups
Table 10: School Initiatives and resources used for School Development Planning
Add comments on the implementation process of the School Development Plan 20__-20__
6
MINISTRY FOR EDUCATION AND EMPLOYMENTDirectorate for Quality and Standards in EducationQuality Assurance Department
Summary of Internal Evaluation 20__-20__
Teachers Questionnaires Distributed Response Rate [%]
Table 11: Response rate teachers’ questionnaire
Teachers’ View [Strengths]% of teachers
indicating strongly agree and agree
Weighted average score
Q1.
Q2.
Q3.
Q4.
Q5.
Q6.
Q7.
Q8.
Q9.
Q10.Table 12: Main strengths highlighted by teachers
Teachers’ View [Weaknesses]% of teachers
indicating strongly disagree and
disagree
Weighted average score
Q1.
Q2.
Q3.
Q4.
Q5.
Q6.
Q7.
Q8.
Q9.
Q10.Table 13: Main weaknesses highlighted by teachers
7
MINISTRY FOR EDUCATION AND EMPLOYMENTDirectorate for Quality and Standards in EducationQuality Assurance Department
Summary of Internal Evaluation 20__-20__ParentsQuestionnaires Distributed Response Rate [%]
Table 14: Response rate parents questionnaire
Parents’ View [Strengths]% of parents
indicating strongly agree and agree
Weighted average score
Q1.
Q2.
Q3.
Q4.
Q5.
Q6.
Q7.
Q8.
Q9.
Q10.Table 15: Main strengths highlighted by parents
Parents’ View [Weaknesses]% of parents
indicating strongly disagree and
disagree
Weighted average score
Q1.
Q2.
Q3.
Q4.
Q5.
Q6.
Q7.
Q8.
Q9.
Q10.Table 16: Main weaknesses highlighted by parents
8
MINISTRY FOR EDUCATION AND EMPLOYMENTDirectorate for Quality and Standards in EducationQuality Assurance Department
Summary of Internal Evaluation 20__-20__Learners
Questionnaires Distributed Response Rate [%]
Table 17: Response rate learners questionnaire
Learners’ View [Strengths]% of learners
indicating strongly agree and agree
Weighted average score
Q1.
Q2.
Q3.
Q4.
Q5.
Q6.
Q7.
Q8.
Q9.
Q10.Table 18: Main strengths highlighted by learners
Learners’ View [Weaknesses]% of learners
indicating strongly disagree and
disagree
Weighted average score
Q1.
Q2.
Q3.
Q4.
Q5.
Q6.
Q7.
Q8.
Q9.
Q10.Table 19: Main weaknesses highlighted by learners
9
MINISTRY FOR EDUCATION AND EMPLOYMENTDirectorate for Quality and Standards in EducationQuality Assurance Department
Summary of Internal Evaluation 20__-20__
Insert the outcomes, if any, that were derived from research methods other than the questionnaire.
10
MINISTRY FOR EDUCATION AND EMPLOYMENTDirectorate for Quality and Standards in EducationQuality Assurance Department
Summary of Internal Evaluation 20__-20__
Specific Targeted Measures – comparison of results obtained in previous year and current internal evaluations
Area of concern 1: Identified in previous year’s internal evaluationWeighted
average score 20__-20__
Weighted average score
20__-20__S1. Learners
Actual statement utilised in close-ended questionnaire.S1. Teachers:
Actual statement utilised in close-ended questionnaire.S1. Parents
Actual statement utilised in close-ended questionnaire.
Area of concern 2: Identified in previous year’s internal evaluationWeighted
average score 20__-20__
Weighted average score
20__-20__S2. Learners
Actual statement utilised in close-ended questionnaire.S2. Teachers
Actual statement utilised in close-ended questionnaire.S2. Parents
Actual statement utilised in close-ended questionnaire.Table 20: Data of the specific measures identified by school
Area of concern 1
20__-20__ 20__-20__
-1.5
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
1.5
LearnersTeachersParents
Area of concern 2
20__-20__ 20__-20__
-2
-1.5
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
LearnersTeachersParents
Graphs 1 and 2: graphical representations of the specific measures indicated by the school
11
MINISTRY FOR EDUCATION AND EMPLOYMENTDirectorate for Quality and Standards in EducationQuality Assurance Department
Summary of Internal Evaluation 20__-20__Specific Targeted Measures [QAD] – refer to latest internal evaluation questionnaire results
Target 1 – Satisfaction% of learners
indicating strongly agree and agree
Weighted average score
S1. Learners I feel happy at school.
S1. Teachers: I feel fulfilled working in my school.
S1. ParentsI would recommend the school to other parents.
Target 2 – Behaviour% of learners
indicating strongly agree and agree
Weighted average score
S2. Learners The school handles disciplinary problems effectively.
S2. Teachers The school’s behaviour management policy is effective in promoting good behaviour.
S2. ParentsThe school handles disciplinary problems in a firm but caring manner.
Table 22: Data of the specific measures indicated by the QAD
Target 1 Target 20
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
LearnersTeachersParents
Graph 2: graphical representation re the specific measures indicated by the QAD (% of respondents indicating agree or strongly agree)
12
MINISTRY FOR EDUCATION AND EMPLOYMENTDirectorate for Quality and Standards in EducationQuality Assurance Department
Evaluation of Action Plans
Evaluation of success criteria for effectiveness in action plans implemented during 20__-20__ (indicate scholastic year)Priority Development Target 1:
Success Criteria 1: Success Criteria [Effectiveness] Identified in action plan
Evaluation[actual outcome]
Success Criteria 2: Success Criteria [Effectiveness] Identified in action plan
Evaluation[actual outcome]
Success Criteria 3: Success Criteria [Effectiveness] Identified in action plan
Evaluation[actual outcome]
Priority Development Target 2:
Success Criteria 1: Success Criteria [Effectiveness] Identified in action plan
Evaluation[actual outcome]
Success Criteria 2: Success Criteria [Effectiveness] Identified in action plan
Evaluation[actual outcome]
Success Criteria 3: Success Criteria [Effectiveness] Identified in action plan
Evaluation[actual outcome]
Priority Development Target 3:
Success Criteria 1: Success Criteria [Effectiveness] Identified in action plan
Evaluation[actual outcome]
Success Criteria 2: Success Criteria [Effectiveness] Identified in action plan
Evaluation[actual outcome]
Success Criteria 3: Success Criteria [Effectiveness] Identified in action plan
Evaluation[actual outcome]
Priority Development Target 4:
Success Criteria 1: Success Criteria [Effectiveness] Identified in action plan
Evaluation[actual outcome]
Success Criteria 2: Success Criteria [Effectiveness] Identified in action plan
Evaluation[actual outcome]
Success Criteria 3: Success Criteria [Effectiveness] Identified in action plan
Evaluation[actual outcome]
Table 23: Evaluation of action plans implemented in 20__-20__
13
MINISTRY FOR EDUCATION AND EMPLOYMENTDirectorate for Quality and Standards in EducationQuality Assurance Department
SWOT analysis
This SWOT exercise is to be completed after the analysis of the internal evaluation process that may include questionnaires, focus groups, SMT meetings, staff meetings, parents’ meetings, student council meetings, etc. (N.B. Keep available a record of
the outcomes.)
Strengths Weaknesses
Opportunities Threats
Table 24: Summary of SWOT derived from school self evaluation
School Priorities
Priority Development Target 1
Priority Development Target 2
Priority Development Target 3
Priority Development Target 4
Table 25: Priority Development Targets identified during school self evaluation
14