Education in the United States & No Child Left Behind

Marc McGuiganPhysics Education ForumMonday, April 23, 2007

Outline

Education in the United States How is elementary and secondary

education funded? What is the role of the federal government?

NCLB What is NCLB? Components of NCLB Controversy

What should be done?

How is elementary and secondary education funded?

Total U.S. Expenditures for Elementary and Secondary Education

Source: Department of Education www.ed.gov

How is elementary and secondary education funded?

Total Expenditures per Pupil (for Fall

Enrollment)

Annual Secondary Education Expenditures

per Student

Source: Department of Education www.ed.gov

The Role of the Federal Government United States Department of Education Secretary of Education – Margaret Spellings National Education Budget $69.4 million (2006) Federal government provides about 8.5% of

public school funds, the rest of the funding comes from state and local taxes.

In FY 2004 the federal government gave $24.3 billion to states to implement NCLB (40% increase from FY 2001)

In FY 2004 federal Title I funding was $12.34 billion

The Role of the Federal GovernmentFederal Spending Under the

Elementary and Secondary Education Act

No Child Left Behind Funding: 2002-06

Source: Department of Education www.ed.gov

The Problem

“Studies show less than half of those who do graduate are ready for college-level math and science.”

“Although U.S. fourth graders score well against international competition, they fall near the bottom or dead last by 12th grade in mathematics and science, respectively.”

Source: Department of Education www.ed.gov

Source: No Politician Left Behind. The Wall Street Journal Editorial Page. February, 15, 2004. http://www.opinionjournal.com/editorial/feat

ure.html?id=110004698

The ProblemPercentage of Twelfth Graders Proficient in Science

                                 

As the U.S. Commission on National Security in the Twenty-First Century reports, "More Americans will have to understand and work competently with science and math on a daily basis . . . the inadequacies of our systems of research and education pose a greater threat to U.S. national security over the next quarter century than any potential conventional war that we might imagine."

The longer students stay in the current system the worse they do. According to the 1995 Third International Mathematics and Science Study, U.S. fourth graders ranked second. By twelfth grade, they fell to 16th, behind nearly every industrialized rival and ahead of only Cyprus and South Africa.

Source: Department of Education www.ed.gov

What is the No Child Left Behind Act? A federal law that reauthorizes many federal

programs (Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965)

Passed by the House of Representatives by a vote of 381 – 41 on December 13, 2001

Passed by the Senate by a vote of 87 – 10 on December 18, 2001

Signed into law by President Bush on January 8, 2002

670 Pages!!

No Child Left Behind

FY 2006 Budget $37.6 billion K-12 Education ESEA, Title I: $13.3 billion IDEA (Individuals with Disabilities Education

Act), Part B, Grants to States: $11.1 billion Improving Teacher Quality: $2.9 billion 21st Century Community Learning Centers:

$991.1 million English Language Learners: $675.8 million Impact Aid: $1.2 billion

No Child Left Behind

Title I Grants for Disadvantaged

Children

Federal Grants to States for Special

Education

Source: Department of Education www.ed.gov

Title I, Part A - Tests Develop state standards in math and

reading/language arts (not new) and science standards by 2005-2006

By 2005-2006 states must implement assessments in reading and math every year in grades 3–8 and once in grades 10–12

By 2007-2008 the states must administer science assessment at least once in grades 3-5, 6-9, and 10-12

Source: Department of Education www.ed.gov

Title I, Part A - Reporting States must disaggregate test results:

Gender English proficiency major racial and ethnic groups migrant status Disability status as economically advantaged

States must make available test results to school districts before the beginning of the next school year

4th and 8th graders in states must participate in the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) to evaluate state academic standards

State Report Cards School District Report Cards Annual State Report to the Secretary of Education

Title I, Part A – Adequate Yearly Progress States must define adequate yearly progress States must review the progress of schools receiving Title I funds If a school fails to meet adequate yearly progress for:

2 years “in need of improvement” Students given the option to transfer to another public school School must spend 10% of Title I Part A on professional development that

address problem 3 years

School must allow low-income students to receive supplemental educational services with Title I funds

4 years – Corrective Action (one of the following) Replace staff New curriculum Decrease management authority Appoint outside exert Extend school day or year

5 years Initiate plans to restructure school

Title I, Part A

Highly Qualified Teachers State certification Bachelor’s degree Subject area competency - New middle and

high school teachers Academic major, graduate degree, coursework

equivalent to an academic major, advanced certification credentialing

State exam

Implement practices based on scientific research

Title II

“The National Science Foundation and the U.S. Department of Education will provide an estimated $1 billion over

five years for results-oriented partnerships between local districts and universities to bring urgency,

tested methods, and high level expertise to rebuilding math

excellence.”Source: Department of Education www.ed.gov

Controversy

National Education Association and the American Federation of Teachers are critical of the NCLB Act

May 3, 2005 Utah governor, Jon Huntsman signs a state law that allows Utah districts to ignore components of NCLB

Unfunded Mandate Argument Against NCLB:

The federal government does not provide the funding necessary to implement the mandates outlined in the NCLB Act

Education is a state and local issue not a federal issue.

Opposing Position: The federal funding of education has increased in

recent years It is not clear whether increased spending improves

the quality of education A state does not have to implement the

components of NCLB. It only has to implement NCLB if it wants to receive federal education funds.

Teach to the Test

Argument Against: Teachers and students spend time on certain topics at

the expense of other interesting topics. Administering tests takes away class time. Tests are not a good indicator of a school’s performance.

Opposing Argument: Tests can gauge if students are learning the necessary

material. Tests allow parents and administrators to compare

schools within a given state as well as identify schools that are failing.

Tests provide accountability for education funding.

Adequate Yearly Progress

Argument Against NCLB: There is an incentive to set expectations low. NCLB sets unrealistically high standards so that

many schools fail, federal education funding drops, and the Department of Education is eliminated.

Opposing Argument: AYP Reports allow students and their parents to

identify failing schools and if a student is in a failing school NCLB gives he/she the opportunity to receive additional services or transfer schools.

References

National Center for Education Statistics, http://nces.ed.gov/ No Child Left Behind: A Desktop Reference,

http://www.ed.gov/admins/lead/account/nclbreference/reference.pdf

Frequently Asked Questions about No Child Left Behind, http://edworkforce.house.gov/issues/108th/education/nclb/nclbfaq.pdf

No Politician Left Behind. The Wall Street Journal Editorial Page. February, 15, 2004. http://www.opinionjournal.com/editorial/feature.html?id=110004698

Highly Qualified Teachers. No Child Left Behind. United States Department of Education. http://www.ed.gov/programs/teacherqual/guidance.doc

Wikipedia