ecology and environment, inc. · CERCLIS No. OK0002024099. II BACKGROUND. The Imperial Refining...
Transcript of ecology and environment, inc. · CERCLIS No. OK0002024099. II BACKGROUND. The Imperial Refining...
CERCLIS No. OK0002024099
REMOVAL ASSESSMENT REPORT -WASTE ENCAPSULATION
FORIMPERIAL REFINING COMPANY
ARDMORE, CARTER COUNTY, OKLAHOMA
October 6,2000
Prepared for:
Henry Thompson, Jr.Project Officer
Program Management BranchEPA - Region 6
Contract No. 68-W6-0013 90641 o
ecology and environment, inc.International Specialists in the Environment1999 Bryan Street, Dallas, Texas 75201Tel: (214) 245-1000, Fax: (214) 245-1001
recycled paper
CERCLIS No. OK0002024099
ecology and environment, inc.International Specialists in the Environment
1999 Bryan StreetDallas, Texas 75201Tel: (214) 245-1000, Fax: (214) 245-1001
Date: October 6,2000
To: Nancy Jones, OSCEPA Region 6 Response and Prevention Branch
Thru: Henry Thompson, Jr., POEPA Region 6 Program Management Branch
Thru: Chris Quina, STLRegion 6 Superfund Technical Assessment and Response Team
From: Dean Rotan, PMRegion 6 Superfund Technical Assessment and Response Team
Subj: Removal Assessment Report: Imperial Refining CompanyArdmore, Carter County, OklahomaTDD#: S06-00-09-0011PAN: 124501SFXXLATITUDE: 34° 11' 30" NorthLONGITUDE: 97° 06' 30" West
Site coordinates were obtained from the Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality(ODEQ) Site Inspection Report. The coordinates refer to the center of the site.
I INTRODUCTION
On September 19, 2000, the Region 6 Superfund Technical Assessment and Response team(START) contractor, Ecology and Environment, Inc. (E & E), was tasked by the United StatesEnvironmental Protection Agency Response and Prevention Branch (EPA-RPB) to provideremoval assessment support under Contract 68-W6-0013, Technical Direction Document (TDD)S06-00-09-0011. Specific tasks included providing cost and volume estimates for thewaste/drum cascade area and the contaminated drainage areas at the site, west of Highway 142.The cost estimate is for encapsulating the waste on-site.
1 TDD No. S06-00-09-0011recycled paper
CERCLIS No. OK0002024099
II BACKGROUND
The Imperial Refining Company (IRC) was a crude oil refining facility that operated from 1917until 1924. According to ODEQ's Preliminary Assessment report, the Sanborn Fire InsuranceMap of the refinery showed that the refinery's tanks and buildings were removed in 1924. Thelarge amount of waste present on the ground indicates that waste products associated with thestructures were dumped onto the ground during the dismantling of the refinery's structures,tanks, and piping. Wastes generated during dismantling operations included contaminated soilsfrom tank bottoms, coke piles, reservoir sediments, and rubble from buildings. IRC declaredbankruptcy in 1934.
The legal description of the property is the SE1/4 of the NE1/4 of Section 20, and the SW1/4 ofthe NW1/4 of Section 21, Township 4 South, Range 2 East, Carter County, Oklahoma. IRCowned additional land in the SW1/4 of the NW1/4 of Section 21, Township 4 South, Range 2East, to the south and east of the Atchison, Topeka, and Santa Fe railroad tracks, bringing thetotal amount of property owned by IRC to approximately 80 acres. According to county records,C.W. and Miriam Hogan presently own the land where IRC operated.
From December 8-10 and 16-17,1998, START members surveyed the site to develop wastevolume estimates. START members utilized Global Positioning System (GPS) technology andTotal Station Electronic Distance Measuring (EDM) instruments to survey the areas containingwaste piles. Approximately 10 to 30 measurements were taken along the perimeter of eachwaste pile to determine its surface area. START members used a Geoprobe™ hydraulic pushsampler and JMC slam-bar samplers to determine the depth of the tar and oily clay layers, anddistance to the clean clay layer (by visual observation) in each area. Approximately 10 to 40depth measurements were taken along transects in each area.
See START'S Removal Assessment Report for Imperial Refining Company, TDD S06-98-10-0020 for a detailed description of volume calculations and sampling missions.
Ill VOLUME AND COSTS ESTIMATES
The waste/drum cascade area was referred to as Area B and the contaminated drainage pathwayinto the wetlands west of Highway 142 was referred to as Area D in the Removal AssessmentReport for Imperial Refining Company. The volume estimates for the two areas are:
Waste/Drum Cascade Area 1,383 cubic yardsDrainage Pathway Area 1.854 cubic yards
Total 3,237 cubic yards
TDD No. S06-00-09-0011
CERCLIS No. OK0002024099
Cost estimates were calculated for encapsulating the wastes on-site. Estimates were determinedfor three possible options: each area separately, and both areas combined. The followingequipment is included in all cost estimates:• One dozer (D4 or D6) with disc attachment. Two dump trucks (16.5 cubic yards)• One sheepfoot roller/compactor• One 3,000-gallon water truck• One track-hoe hydraulic excavator (1.5 cubic yard)• One front-end loader (1 cubic yard)
For encapsulating the waste on-site, it was estimated that a half-acre area would have to becleared and graded. Table 1 lists the approximate sizes of the encapsulation cells for the threeoptions.
Table 1Encapsulation Cell Size
AreaWaste/Drum AreaDrainage AreaBoth Areas Combined
Length (ft)100100125
Width (ft)100100125
Height (ft)688
For all three encapsulation options, the following assumptions were made:. 1-foot clay base for encapsulation area,. 1.5-feet clay cap,. 0.5-foot topsoil cover over clay cap,
1:3 slope for sides of cell.
The R.S. Means, Environmental Cost and Handling Options and Solutions 1997 handbook wasused to estimate capital costs. The estimated capital costs (excluding labor, oversight, etc.) foreach option is:
Waste/Drum Area $58,000Drainage Area $63,000Both Areas Combined $92,000
For detailed descriptions of each option's cost estimate, see Tables 3, 4, and 5 in Attachment A.
Since contractor labor rates were unknown, the hours for each task were included in Table 2.The hours can be used to calculate labor costs once the number of personnel on-site and theirassociated labor rates are known. For cost estimation purposes, it was estimated that a four mancrew would operate equipment on-site.
TDD No. S06-00-09-0011
CERCLIS No. OK0002024099
Table 2Hour Estimate - Per Person
TaskMobilization/Set-upSite Clearing/GrubbingSite GradingSurveyingClay Hauling/CompactingExcavation - Drum AreaExcavation - Drainage AreaLoading/Compacting CellCapping ClayCapping SoilSurveying
Total
Days35313353321
32
Hours/Person1
3050301030305030302010
320Based on 10-hour work day.
ATTACHMENTS
A Cost Estimate; Tables 3 thru 7B Copy of TDD Number S06-00-09-0011
TDD No. S06-00-09-0011
ATTACHMENT A
Table 3IMPERIAL REFINING COMPANY
Ardmore, OklahomaPreliminary Construction Cost Estimate - Waste Encapsulation
Drum Cascade Area
Reference1
Estimated021 1040010021 104015017030101025 122010033 08 0507022 238 0250022 266 00100222620010022 204 2300021 14402001805030118054021805201Estimated
DescriptionMobilization/demobilization2
Site clearingGrub stumps and removeRough gradingFine gradingClay, compacted in place3
Excavating waste materialHauling waste to fill areaSpread dumped waste materialCompactionStrippingTop soil, on-site, 6" liftSeeding, fertilizing.wateringSilt fence, temporarySurvey
Quantity1
0.50.5
2420242095213831383138313832151940.5400
2
Unitlump sumacreacresq. yardssq. yardscubic yardscubic yardscubic yardscubic yardscubic yardscubic yardscubic yardsacrelinear feetlump sum
Rate$10,000.00$2,175.00$1,063.00
S2.32$0.46
$11.87$1.76$2.67$1.40$2.34$0.47$4.35
$2,382.75S3.93
$1,000.00
Subtotal Direct Capital CostOverhead and Profit (12%)Total Direct Capital Cost
Contingency Allowance (10%)
Total Capital Cost (rounded to the nearest SI, 000)
Cost$10,000$1,088
$532$5,614$1,113
$11,300$2,434$3,693$1,936$3,236
$101$844
$1,191$1,572$2,000
$46,654$5,599
$52,253$5,225
$58,000
R.S. Means, Environmental Cost and Handling Options and Solutions, 19972See Table 63See Table 7
Table 4IMPERIAL REFINING COMPANY
Ardmore, OklahomaPreliminary Construction Cost Estimate - Waste Encapsulation
Drainage Area
Reference1
Estimated021 1040010021 104015017030101025 122010033 08 0507022 238 025002226600100222620010022 204 2300021 14402001805030118054021805201Estimated
DescriptionMobi lization/demobi lizationSite clearingGrub stumps and removeRough gradingFine gradingClay, compacted in placeExcavating waste materialHauling waste to fill areaSpread dumped waste materialCompactionStrippingTop soil, on-site, 6" liftSeeding, fertilizing,wateringSilt fence, temporarySurvey
Quantity1
0.50.5
2420242098618541854185418542252050.5400
2
Unitlump sumacreacresq. yardssq. yardscubic yardscubic yardscubic yardscubic yardscubic yardscubic yardscubic yardsacrelinear feetlump sum
Rate$10,000.00
$2,175.00$1,063.00
$2.32$0.46
$11.87$1.76$2.67$1.40$2.34$0.47$4.35
$2,382.75$3.93
$1,000.00
Subtotal Direct Capital CostOverhead and Profit (12%)Total Direct Capital Cost
Contingency Allowance (10%)
Total Capital Cost (rounded to the nearest $1,000)
Cost$10,000
$1,088$532
$5,614$1,113
$11,704$3,263$4,950$2,596$4,338
$106$892
$1,191$1,572$2,000
$50,958$6,115
$57,073$5,707
$63,000
'R.S. Means, Environmental Cost and Handling Options and Solutions, 1997
'See Table 63See Table 7
Table 5IMPERIAL REFINING COMPANY
Ardmore, OklahomaPreliminary Construction Cost Estimate - Waste Encapsulation
Drum Cascade Area and Drainage Pathway Combined
Reference'Estimated021 1040010021 104015017030101025 122010033 08 0507022 238 025002226600100222620010022 204 2300021 14402001805030118054021805201Estimated
DescriptionMobilization/demobilization*Site clearingGrub stumps and removeRough gradingFine gradingClay, compacted in place'5
Excavating waste materialHauling waste to fill areaSpread dumped waste materialCompactionStrippingTop soil, on-site, 6" liftj
Seeding, fertilizing,wateringSilt fence, temporarySurvey
Quantity1
0.50.5
39773977152632373237323732373503160.5500
2
Unitlump sumacreacresq. yardssq. yardscubic yardscubic yardscubic yardscubic yardscubic yardscubic yardscubic yardsacrelinear feetlump sum
Rate$10,000.00$2,175.00$1,063.00
$2.32$0.46
$11.87S1.76$2.67$1.40$2.34$0.47$4.35
$2,382.75$3.93
$1,000.00
Subtotal Direct Capital CostOverhead and Profit (12%)Total Direct Capital Cost
Contingency Allowance (10%)
Total Capital Cost (rounded to the nearest $1,000)
Cost$10,000$1,088
$532$9,227$1,829
$18,114$5,697$8,643$4,532$7,575
$165$1,375$1,191$1,965$2,000
$73,930$8,872
$82,802$8,280
$92,000
'R.S. Means, Environmental Cost and Handling Options and Solutions, 19972See Table 6'See Table 7
Table 6Mobilization and Demobilization Estimate
Reference'
015-904-450
010-034-0100
010-034-0120
010-034-0140
010-034-0160
010-036-0120
016-420-6410
022-274-0020
0022-274-1200
Estimated
Estimated
EstimatedEstimated
Description
Office Trailer (50 feet x 10 feet)
Office Equipment Rental
Office SuppliesTelephone
Field Office Lights & HVAC
Field EngineerPortable Chemical Toilet
Dozer, Mobilization/Demobilization
Front End Loader, Mobilization/Demobilization
Health and Safety PlanInitial Survey
Excavator
Dump Truck
Quantity
11
1
1
11
111
1
112
Unit
per month
per month
per month
per monthper month
per month
per month
each
each
eachacre
eacheach
Rate
280129
83230
86
3100
90
240.5
214
2000
1500
Cost
280129
83
230
86
3100
90
240.5
214
2000
1500
1250
378Total $9,581
'R.S. Means, Environmental Cost and Handling Options and Solutions, 1997
LengthBase 125Top 80
Clay Volume For CapTop Area =Surface Area Sides =Cap Thickness =Total Cap Volume =
Clay Volume For BaseBase Area =Base Thickness =Total base Volume =
Total Clay Volume »
Topsoil CoverTop Area =Surface Area Sides =Soil Thickness =Total Soil Volume =
Areas CombinedWidth Height
12580 8
6400 sq ft10660 sq ft
18 inches948 cu yds
15625 sqf t12 inches
579 cu yds
1 526 cu yds
6400 sqft10660 sq ft
6 inches316 cuyds
Table 7Clay Volume Calculations
Drum Area OnlyLength Width Height
100 10055 55 6
3025 sq ft7440 sq ft
18 inches581 cuyds
10000 sq ft12 inches
370 cu yds
952 cuyds
3025 sq ft7440 sqf t
6 inches194 cuyds
Drainage Area OnlyLength Width Height
100 10055 55 8
3025 sq ft8060 sq ft
18 inches616 cuyds
10000 sq ft12 inches
370 cu yds
986 cu yds
3025 sq ft8060 sq ft
6 inches205 cu yds
ATTACHMENT B
EPA Technical Direction Document(TDD) 06-00-09-0011
START CONTRACT #: 68-W6-0013Activity Type: IV.A.O Removal AssessmentsTask: smatlGeneral Task Description: Removal AssessmentEstimated Completion Date: 10/06/2000
Created On: 09/18/2000DPO/PO: ThompsonTask Monitor: Jones N. (214/665-8041)Task Codes: SF; RS
Imperial Refining CompanyEast of Refinery Road and South Hwy
Site/Project Name:Street Address:142County Name: CarterCity, State, Zip: Ardmore, OK 73401SSID#: GX CERCLIS#: OK0002024099
Estimated Cost; $2,024.80Estimated Hrs; 40
Dedicated:40Non-Dedicated:0
Funds Source: CERCLADCN #(s):SCR007 (BGW) CERCLA $2,024.80
Deliverable:l_etter ReportOvertime: Not ApplicableReference: No
TDD Expenditure Limit: $2,024.80Hours: 40
Dedicated Hours: 40Non-Dedicated Hours: 0
Staffing: Dedicated StaffPriority: HighStart Date: 09/15/2000
Comments: Provide cost and volume estimate for waste/drum cascade area and contaiminated drainagepathways that lead directly to wetlands. The cost estimate should be for encapsulating the wasteon-site. The estimate should be for the individual areas and a total cost.
Standard Language: Coordinate with Task Monitor
A. TDD Created By: - Signed by Nancy Jones/R6/USEPA/US on 09/15/2000 03:24:46 PM, according to /USEP
Signed On:
B. Reviewed and Approved By: - Signed by Tobin Osterberg/R6/USEPA/US on 09/18/2000 06:47:24 PM, accoiContract Officer: 09/18/2000
Tobin Osterberg Signed On:
TDD #06-00-09-0011 Printed On 09/19/2000 at 01:08:01 PM