Eaton Micro 6e Ch12
-
Upload
sailormoon8998 -
Category
Documents
-
view
223 -
download
0
Transcript of Eaton Micro 6e Ch12
7/27/2019 Eaton Micro 6e Ch12
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/eaton-micro-6e-ch12 1/27
© 2005 Pearson Education Canada Inc.12.1
Chapter 12
The Distribution of Income
7/27/2019 Eaton Micro 6e Ch12
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/eaton-micro-6e-ch12 2/27
© 2005 Pearson Education Canada Inc.12.2
The Lorenz Curve
The Lorenz Curve measures income distributionby ranking individuals by income and thenplotting their cumulative number against the
cumulative percentage of income received. A perfectly equal distribution of income would
be 45 degree line.
The more unequal the distribution of income,the more “bowed” the Lorenz Curve becomes.
7/27/2019 Eaton Micro 6e Ch12
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/eaton-micro-6e-ch12 3/27
© 2005 Pearson Education Canada Inc.12.3
Figure 12.1 A Lorenz curve
7/27/2019 Eaton Micro 6e Ch12
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/eaton-micro-6e-ch12 5/27
© 2005 Pearson Education Canada Inc.12.5
Product Exhaustion
If any measure of productivity is to serveas a distributional principle, it must fulfillthe product exhaustion criterion.
The product exhaustion criterion statesthat if owners of all resources receivewhat their resources produce, then the
individual shares of the total product piemust sum to 1.
7/27/2019 Eaton Micro 6e Ch12
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/eaton-micro-6e-ch12 6/27
© 2005 Pearson Education Canada Inc.12.6
Product Exhaustion
Consider a firm in long-run equilibriumusing 2 inputs to producing y* of output.
The value of the firm’s output (py*), isthe sum of the firm’s input payments(w1z1*) + (w2z2*).
If, at the firm level, the product is justused up, the two must be equal.
Therefore: py*=w1z1*+w2z2*
7/27/2019 Eaton Micro 6e Ch12
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/eaton-micro-6e-ch12 7/27
© 2005 Pearson Education Canada Inc.12.7
Product Exhaustion
Re-writing gives:
p=(w1z1*+w2z2*)/y=LAC(y*)
This equality follows from the price beingequal to minimum average cost in long-run perfectly competitive equilibrium.
The product-exhaustion criteria istherefore satisfied in a competitiveequilibrium.
7/27/2019 Eaton Micro 6e Ch12
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/eaton-micro-6e-ch12 8/27
© 2005 Pearson Education Canada Inc.12.8
The Redistributionist Principle
The redistribution principle is at oddswith the productivity principle.
Redistributionists find significanteconomic inequalities unacceptable.
They argue that wealth and incomein the real world should beredistributed from rich to poor.
7/27/2019 Eaton Micro 6e Ch12
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/eaton-micro-6e-ch12 9/27
© 2005 Pearson Education Canada Inc.12.9
Redistribution of Income
Regardless of why income distributiontakes place, some methods are betterthan others.
Many of the schemes inevitable result ina conflict between equity and efficiency.
The challenge is to design economic
institutions that achieve the desireddistribution and minimize the resultinginefficiencies.
7/27/2019 Eaton Micro 6e Ch12
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/eaton-micro-6e-ch12 10/27
© 2005 Pearson Education Canada Inc.12.10
Minimum Wage Legislation
The real question regarding minimumwage legislations is, “do they help theworking poor?”
- Does it achieve the desired redistributionof income?
- Are workers in the industry better-off?
- Whose income falls to make up for therise in minimum wage income?
- Is inefficiency an invariable side effect?
7/27/2019 Eaton Micro 6e Ch12
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/eaton-micro-6e-ch12 11/27
© 2005 Pearson Education Canada Inc.12.11
Figure 12.2 Minimum-wage legislation
in a competitive labour market
7/27/2019 Eaton Micro 6e Ch12
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/eaton-micro-6e-ch12 12/27
© 2005 Pearson Education Canada Inc.12.12
Minimum Wage Legislation
In a competitive market, inefficiencyis a necessary by-product of aneffective minimum wage law.
As labour services are no longer putto there most productive uses, eitherunemployment or underemployment
will signal that inefficiency.
7/27/2019 Eaton Micro 6e Ch12
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/eaton-micro-6e-ch12 13/27
© 2005 Pearson Education Canada Inc.12.13
Figure 12.3 Minimum wage and a
monopsonist’s marginal factor cost
7/27/2019 Eaton Micro 6e Ch12
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/eaton-micro-6e-ch12 14/27
© 2005 Pearson Education Canada Inc.12.14
Monopsonistic Labour Markets
Once a minimum wage is brought into amonopsony, the marginal factor cost willchange.
From Figure 12.3, if the monopsonist hires anamount of labour less than z’, its marginalfactor cost is w’.
If it hires beyond that point, its marginal factor
cost is segment BC of its original marginalfactor cost function because it can hireadditional workers only at a wage rate higherthan w’.
7/27/2019 Eaton Micro 6e Ch12
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/eaton-micro-6e-ch12 15/27
© 2005 Pearson Education Canada Inc.12.15
Figure 12.4 Minimum wage and monopsony
7/27/2019 Eaton Micro 6e Ch12
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/eaton-micro-6e-ch12 16/27
© 2005 Pearson Education Canada Inc.12.16
Minimum Wage and Monopsony
Does a minimum wage increase workersincomes?
Yes, if wage is not higher than w”’ someworkers are better off and none worse off
because:- At w* or below, it has no effect.
- At above w* but below w’’’ workers hiredbefore the introduction of the minimum
wage will paid more and new workers will behired at the new (minimum) wage.
- If the rate is w”’, no new workers are hired,but existing workers will be paid more.
7/27/2019 Eaton Micro 6e Ch12
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/eaton-micro-6e-ch12 17/27
© 2005 Pearson Education Canada Inc.12.17
Minimum Wage Legislation
The attractiveness of minimum wage legislationdepends upon whether labour markets arecompetitive or a monopsony.
Empirical evidence suggests that labour
markets covered by minimum wage laws arecompetitive, and the laws are problematic.
Workers who remain employed are better off.Its is not clear at whose expense the gain is
made (we do not know who pays). By creating un/underemployment the
legislation will hurt some people it wasintended to help.
7/27/2019 Eaton Micro 6e Ch12
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/eaton-micro-6e-ch12 18/27
© 2005 Pearson Education Canada Inc.12.18
Figure 12.5 Title
7/27/2019 Eaton Micro 6e Ch12
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/eaton-micro-6e-ch12 19/27
© 2005 Pearson Education Canada Inc.12.19
Figure 12.5: The Underemployment
Equilibrium
Imposing the wage floor means that someworkers are reallocated from sector 1 tosector 2 and as a result the wage rate in
sector 2 falls. Because $6 is less than the competitive
wage of $9, workers are not allocated totheir most productive jobs.
The wage floor yields an equilibrium withunderemployment.
7/27/2019 Eaton Micro 6e Ch12
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/eaton-micro-6e-ch12 20/27
© 2005 Pearson Education Canada Inc.12.20
Figure 12.6 Wage floors and search
unemployment in a two-sector model
7/27/2019 Eaton Micro 6e Ch12
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/eaton-micro-6e-ch12 21/27
© 2005 Pearson Education Canada Inc.12.21
Figure 12.6: The Unemployment
Equilibrium
The equilibrium wage in sector 2 of theunderemployment model is lower than thesector 2 wage of the unemploymentmodel.
In unemployment model, some non-unionized workers will leave sector 2 tochase union jobs in sector 1.
As a result, the smaller number on non-unionized workers remaining in sector 2will earn a higher wage.
7/27/2019 Eaton Micro 6e Ch12
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/eaton-micro-6e-ch12 22/27
© 2005 Pearson Education Canada Inc.12.22
Figure 12.6: The Unemployment
Equilibrium
Two sources of inefficiency arise inthis model:
1. There is unemployment equal to uin quadrant I of Figure 12.6.
2. The allocation of workers who areemployed is inefficient because thewage floor exceeds the equilibriumwage.
7/27/2019 Eaton Micro 6e Ch12
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/eaton-micro-6e-ch12 24/27
© 2005 Pearson Education Canada Inc.12.24
The Efficient Transfer Mechanism
Although the lump-sum mechanismis efficient, it is not practical.
There is no systematic way of
choosing a target indifference curveor identifying individual preferencesand budgets to pinpoint recipients.
As a result, maintenance policies areformulated in terms of income ratherthan utility (income-maintenance).
7/27/2019 Eaton Micro 6e Ch12
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/eaton-micro-6e-ch12 25/27
© 2005 Pearson Education Canada Inc.12.25
Income-Maintenance Programs
Income-maintenance programs havethe objective of raising the income of anyone below a targeted level of
income, up to that level. In practical income-maintenance
schemes, the amount of the incometransfer is conditional upon theamount of the recipient’s earnedincome.
7/27/2019 Eaton Micro 6e Ch12
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/eaton-micro-6e-ch12 26/27
© 2005 Pearson Education Canada Inc.12.26
Figure 12.8 An inefficient
income-transfer mechanism