Eaton Micro 6e Ch11

download Eaton Micro 6e Ch11

of 38

Transcript of Eaton Micro 6e Ch11

  • 7/27/2019 Eaton Micro 6e Ch11

    1/38

    2005 Pearson Education Canada Inc.11.1

    Chapter 11

    Input Markets and the

    Allocation of Resources

  • 7/27/2019 Eaton Micro 6e Ch11

    2/38

    2005 Pearson Education Canada Inc.11.2

    Perfectly Competitive Input Markets

    There are two types of input markets:

    1. Primary inputmarkets include resourcesthat have not been processed by otherfirms, such as land, oil and labour.

    2. Intermediate inputmarkets are theprocessed output from other firms, suchas iron ingots, hog bellies and rolledsteel.

  • 7/27/2019 Eaton Micro 6e Ch11

    3/38

  • 7/27/2019 Eaton Micro 6e Ch11

    4/38

    2005 Pearson Education Canada Inc.11.4

    The Supply of Non-Labour Inputs

    Renewable resources, such as land, can

    be used over and over again.

    Non-Renewable resources, like oil, onceused it is gone.

    In the analysis that follows, it is assumed

    that the supply of non-labour inputs is

    perfectly price-elastic.

  • 7/27/2019 Eaton Micro 6e Ch11

    5/38

    2005 Pearson Education Canada Inc.11.5

    The Supply of Labour

    An individual faces two constraints:

    1. The time constraint says that totaltime available (T) equals work time(h) plus leisure time (x1): h+x1=T

    2. The income constraintsays that apersons income (x

    2

    ) is the sum ofwork income (wage x h) and non-workincome (A): X2=wh+A

  • 7/27/2019 Eaton Micro 6e Ch11

    6/38

    2005 Pearson Education Canada Inc.11.6

    The Leisure-Income Constraint

    The leisure income constraint:wx1+x2=A+wT

    The wage (w) is the price of leisure and

    the slope of the budget constraint.A+wT is full (all work) income.

    The utility maximizing bundle of

    leisure/labour is where the indifferencecurve is tangent to the leisure-incomeconstraint in Figure 11.1

  • 7/27/2019 Eaton Micro 6e Ch11

    7/38

    2005 Pearson Education Canada Inc.11.7

    Figure 11.1 The demand for

    leisure and the supply of labour

  • 7/27/2019 Eaton Micro 6e Ch11

    8/38

    2005 Pearson Education Canada Inc.11.8

    Figure 11.2 Leisure as a normal good

  • 7/27/2019 Eaton Micro 6e Ch11

    9/38

    2005 Pearson Education Canada Inc.11.9

    Figure 11.3 Income and substitution

    effects for a wage change

  • 7/27/2019 Eaton Micro 6e Ch11

    10/38

    2005 Pearson Education Canada Inc.11.10

    Response to a Change in Wage Rate

    When leisure is a normal good, the hours ofwork may increase or decrease in response to awage increase depending upon whether the

    income effect is greater than or less than theincome effect.

    When leisure is an inferior good, an increase inwage rate invariably leads to a decrease in

    leisure hours and an increase in work hours

  • 7/27/2019 Eaton Micro 6e Ch11

    11/38

    2005 Pearson Education Canada Inc.11.11

    Figure 11.4 (a & b) The demand for

    leisure and the supply of labour

  • 7/27/2019 Eaton Micro 6e Ch11

    12/38

    2005 Pearson Education Canada Inc.11.12

    Firms Demand for One variable Input

    The short-run demand functionrelates to a scenario where only oneinput is variable.

  • 7/27/2019 Eaton Micro 6e Ch11

    13/38

    2005 Pearson Education Canada Inc.11.13

    Input Demand in a One-Good Economy

    For any wage less than themaximum value of the averageproduct, the firms demand function

    is the downward sloping portion ofthe marginal product curve.

    For any wage rate greater than themaximum value of the averageproduct, the firm maximizes profitsby hiring no labour.

  • 7/27/2019 Eaton Micro 6e Ch11

    14/38

    2005 Pearson Education Canada Inc.11.14

    Figure 11.5 Input demand in a one-good economy

  • 7/27/2019 Eaton Micro 6e Ch11

    15/38

    2005 Pearson Education Canada Inc.11.15

    Transforming the Product Curves

    into Revenue Curves

    Marginal Revenue Product is the marginalproduct from an addition unit of labourtimes the marginal revenue when the

    additional output is sold:MRP(z)=MR(y)MP(z)

    Similarly, average revenue productequals the price of the output timesaverage product of the variable input:

    ARP(z)=pAP(z)

  • 7/27/2019 Eaton Micro 6e Ch11

    16/38

    2005 Pearson Education Canada Inc.11.16

    Figure 11.6 The firms demand for

    one variable input

  • 7/27/2019 Eaton Micro 6e Ch11

    17/38

  • 7/27/2019 Eaton Micro 6e Ch11

    18/38

    2005 Pearson Education Canada Inc.11.18

    The Firms Demand Curve for One

    Variable Input

    The value of the marginal product (MRP)of the variable input (VMPz) is outputprice time marginal product:

    VMPz=pMP(z).For a perfect competitor VMP =MRP

    (since p=MR).

    For a monopolisy MRP

  • 7/27/2019 Eaton Micro 6e Ch11

    19/38

    2005 Pearson Education Canada Inc.11.19

    Input Demand with Many Variable Inputs

    In the long-run all inputs arevariable.

    In the long run, the firms responseto an input-price change will via boththe substitution effect and the outputeffect, produce a downward sloping

    input demand curve

  • 7/27/2019 Eaton Micro 6e Ch11

    20/38

    2005 Pearson Education Canada Inc.11.20

    Figure 11.7 The substitution effect

    of an input price change

  • 7/27/2019 Eaton Micro 6e Ch11

    21/38

    2005 Pearson Education Canada Inc.11.21

    Figure 11.8 Comparing long-run and

    short-run input demand functions

  • 7/27/2019 Eaton Micro 6e Ch11

    22/38

    2005 Pearson Education Canada Inc.11.22

    Elasticity Rules for Derived Demand

    The response to an input pricechange in both the short and longrun is to demand more (less) of an

    input as its price fall (rises).

    The response to a input price changeis greater in the long run than in the

    short run.

  • 7/27/2019 Eaton Micro 6e Ch11

    23/38

    2005 Pearson Education Canada Inc.11.23

    Equilibrium in a Competitive Market

    In the long run, a firm that is a perfectcompetitor in both its output and input marketwill chose a input bundle such that for eachinput:

    we=MRP(z)=pMP(z)=VMP(z)

    In long-run equilibrium, a firm that is a perfectcompetitor in its input markets but a

    competitor in its output market, will choose aninput bundle such that for each input:

    we=MRP(z)=MR(y)MP(z)

  • 7/27/2019 Eaton Micro 6e Ch11

    24/38

    2005 Pearson Education Canada Inc.11.24

    Figure 11.9 Equilibrium in a

    competitive input market

  • 7/27/2019 Eaton Micro 6e Ch11

    25/38

    2005 Pearson Education Canada Inc.11.25

    Monopsony in Input Markets

    A monopsonist has significant controlover what it pays for an input.

    The relationship between input price(w) and quantity of the input (z) isdetermined by the market supplyfunction for the input: w=S(w).

  • 7/27/2019 Eaton Micro 6e Ch11

    26/38

    2005 Pearson Education Canada Inc.11.26

    Monopsony in Input Markets

    The monopsonist buys all units of aninput at the same price (averagefactor cost or AFC).

    Total factor cost (TFC) is quantity (z)times AFC or price S(z):

    TFC(z)=zS(z)

  • 7/27/2019 Eaton Micro 6e Ch11

    27/38

    2005 Pearson Education Canada Inc.11.27

    Monopsony in Input Markets

    The marginal factor cost (MFC) is the rateat which TFC changes as the quantity ofoutput (z) changes.

    When a monopsonist buys a positivequantity of the input, the MFC exceedsprice (w) or average factor cost.

    The MFC=w+z(slope of supply curve):

  • 7/27/2019 Eaton Micro 6e Ch11

    28/38

    2005 Pearson Education Canada Inc.11.28

    Figure 11.11 A monopsonists

    profit-maximizing decision

  • 7/27/2019 Eaton Micro 6e Ch11

    29/38

    2005 Pearson Education Canada Inc.11.29

    Profit Maximizing Input Decisions

    The general profit-maximizing rule in aninput market is to buy an input up to thepoint where marginal factor cost is equal

    to marginal revenue product.

    For a competitive input market:

    MRP(z*)=MFC(z*)=w*

    For a monopsonist:

    MRP(z*)=MFC(z*)>w*

  • 7/27/2019 Eaton Micro 6e Ch11

    30/38

    2005 Pearson Education Canada Inc.11.30

    Figure 11.13 The inefficiency of monopsony

  • 7/27/2019 Eaton Micro 6e Ch11

    31/38

    2005 Pearson Education Canada Inc.11.31

    Figure 11.15 Resource allocation summarized

  • 7/27/2019 Eaton Micro 6e Ch11

    32/38

    2005 Pearson Education Canada Inc.11.32

    The Firms Demand for Capital Inputs

    Since capital is durable, the sum of presentvalues of MRP through time is:

    MRP=MRP0+[MRP1/(1+i)]++[MRP1/(1+i)D-1]

    The optimal quantity of capital input is thequantity where the present value of themarginal revenue products over its life is equalto the present value of all costs of this input

    (p= MRP). The MRP is the firms demand curve for

    gadgets.

  • 7/27/2019 Eaton Micro 6e Ch11

    33/38

    2005 Pearson Education Canada Inc.11.33

    Figure 11.16 The demand for a capital input

  • 7/27/2019 Eaton Micro 6e Ch11

    34/38

    2005 Pearson Education Canada Inc.11.34

    Human Capital Decisions Over Time

    Human capital-investments in educationand training.

    Human capital production function:

    R=F(H)Which says additional income (return on

    human capital investment) (R), is a

    diminishing function of the quantity ofhuman capital (H).

  • 7/27/2019 Eaton Micro 6e Ch11

    35/38

    2005 Pearson Education Canada Inc.11.35

    Figure 11.17 Investing in human capital

  • 7/27/2019 Eaton Micro 6e Ch11

    36/38

    2005 Pearson Education Canada Inc.11.36

    From Figure 11.17

    Invest in an additional dollar ofhuman capital if the marginalproduct (MP) exceeds the rate at

    which current foregone consumptioncan generate future consumption(1+i).

    To maximize the present value of netincome, invest in human capital upto the point where MP=(1+i).

  • 7/27/2019 Eaton Micro 6e Ch11

    37/38

    2005 Pearson Education Canada Inc.11.37

    Figure 11.18 Another perspective on

    the human capital investment

  • 7/27/2019 Eaton Micro 6e Ch11

    38/38

    2005 Pearson Education Canada Inc11 38

    Figure 11.19 The life-cycle choice