DudLess deja vu’s the Derby cardd284f45nftegze.cloudfront.net/BenetBennett/DudLess deja vus the...

20
DudLess deja vu’s the Derby card (Long two Jorge Navarro entrants @ 14-1 and 13-1) DudLess May 2016

Transcript of DudLess deja vu’s the Derby cardd284f45nftegze.cloudfront.net/BenetBennett/DudLess deja vus the...

  • DudLess deja vu’s the Derby card(Long two Jorge Navarro entrants @ 14-1 and 13-1)

    DudLess

    May 2016

  • Recitals – Race 7 – 2016 Churchill Downs Stakes

  • sholker [printed: August 29, 2007 8:03 AM] [saved: August 29, 2007 8:19 AM] C:\Documents and Settings\sholker\Desktop\Sholk\Presentation\Sholk Molecular Diagnostics Presentation Final.ppt

    Whereas,

    9 thoroughbreds competed in the 2016 Churchill Downs Stakes, a Grade II stakes

    race on the Kentucky Derby undercard

    2016 Churchill Downs Stakes - Final odds

    Horse # Horse name Post-takeout implied win %

    1 Kobe's Back 3.6 to 1.0 1.0 in 4.6 21.7%

    2 Squadron A 39.1 to 1.0 1.0 in 40.1 2.5%

    3 Calculator 6.2 to 1.0 1.0 in 7.2 13.9%

    4 Barbados 15.1 to 1.0 1.0 in 16.1 6.2%

    5 Limousine Liberal 4.7 to 1.0 1.0 in 5.7 17.5%

    6 Speightster 3.0 to 1.0 1.0 in 4.0 25.0%

    7 Holy Boss 8.4 to 1.0 1.0 in 9.4 10.6%

    8 Salutos Amigos 4.6 to 1.0 1.0 in 5.6 17.9%

    9 Catalina Red 14.1 to 1.0 1.0 in 15.1 6.6%

    Source: Equibase Check 122.0%

    Takeout

    18.0%

    Horse # Horse name Bettor-implied win probability

    1 Kobe's Back 4.6 to 1.0 1.0 in 5.6 17.8%

    2 Squadron A 47.9 to 1.0 1.0 in 48.9 2.0%

    3 Calculator 7.8 to 1.0 1.0 in 8.8 11.4%

    4 Barbados 18.6 to 1.0 1.0 in 19.6 5.1%

    5 Limousine Liberal 6.0 to 1.0 1.0 in 7.0 14.4%

    6 Speightster 3.9 to 1.0 1.0 in 4.9 20.5%

    7 Holy Boss 10.5 to 1.0 1.0 in 11.5 8.7%

    8 Salutos Amigos 5.8 to 1.0 1.0 in 6.8 14.6%

    9 Catalina Red 17.4 to 1.0 1.0 in 18.4 5.4%

    Source: Equibase, analyst adjustments Check 100.0%

    Actual odds on win bet Implied win probability

    0% takeout odds on win bet Implied win probability

  • sholker [printed: August 29, 2007 8:03 AM] [saved: August 29, 2007 8:19 AM] C:\Documents and Settings\sholker\Desktop\Sholk\Presentation\Sholk Molecular Diagnostics Presentation Final.ppt

    Whereas,

    One horse, Catalina Red (9), was entered by trainer Jorge Navarro, whose 2016

    win rate of 31% was higher than every trainer with entrants in the race and all but

    two trainers in the United States with more than 100 starts

    While it’s true trainers and

    jockeys don’t win races, we

    do put horses in positions to

    win races. In that regard, I’ve

    been among the very best

    trainers in the US in 2016.

    Source: Equibase (link)

    https://www.equibase.com/profiles/Results.cfm?type=People&searchType=T&eID=264779https://www.equibase.com/profiles/Results.cfm?type=People&searchType=T&eID=264779https://www.equibase.com/stats/View.cfm?tf=year&tb=trainer&rbt=TB

  • sholker [printed: August 29, 2007 8:03 AM] [saved: August 29, 2007 8:19 AM] C:\Documents and Settings\sholker\Desktop\Sholk\Presentation\Sholk Molecular Diagnostics Presentation Final.ppt

    Whereas,

    Bettors bid up Catalina Red’s win bet odds to 14-1 (17-1 pre-takeout), which

    implied the Navarro-entered horse had a far lower ~5% chance to win, meaning

    bettors collectively believed clearly superior horses to Catalina Red were entered

    Horse # Horse name Bettor-implied win probability

    6 Speightster 3.9 to 1.0 1.0 in 4.9 20.5%

    1 Kobe's Back 4.6 to 1.0 1.0 in 5.6 17.8%

    8 Salutos Amigos 5.8 to 1.0 1.0 in 6.8 14.6%

    5 Limousine Liberal 6.0 to 1.0 1.0 in 7.0 14.4%

    3 Calculator 7.8 to 1.0 1.0 in 8.8 11.4%

    7 Holy Boss 10.5 to 1.0 1.0 in 11.5 8.7%

    9 Catalina Red 17.4 to 1.0 1.0 in 18.4 5.4%

    4 Barbados 18.6 to 1.0 1.0 in 19.6 5.1%

    2 Squadron A 47.9 to 1.0 1.0 in 48.9 2.0%

    Source: Equibase, analyst adjustments Check 100.0%

    0% takeout odds on win bet Implied win probability

    Of every 100 bananas bet to

    win, Catalina Red took only 5.4.

    Prior to race start, bettors

    believed 6 other horses had a

    better chance to win.

  • sholker [printed: August 29, 2007 8:03 AM] [saved: August 29, 2007 8:19 AM] C:\Documents and Settings\sholker\Desktop\Sholk\Presentation\Sholk Molecular Diagnostics Presentation Final.ppt

    Whereas,

    None of the other horses’ past performances suggested they were clearly superior

    to Catalina Red

    Bettors likely avoided Catalina Red because he had earned the lowest top

    Beyer Speed Figure in the field. However, he’d earned it in a win after an

    extended layoff, was racing for a 31% trainer for the first time since being

    transferred from a 13% trainer and had J. Castellano up (1 of 3 jockeys in the

    race with 20%+ win rates). Could a warmup race, the Navarro effect, an elite

    jockey and a demonstrated will to win bridge a 2-4 length speed gap?

    Horse # Horse namePost-takeout

    win bet final odds

    Pre-takout

    win bet final odds

    Bettor-implied win

    probability

    Highest 2016

    Beyer Speed Figure Will to win?* Potential winner?

    6 Speightster 3.0 3.9 20.5% NA, last start Jul. 2015Questionable, won last 3 starts but no

    starts in 10 months due to injury?

    1 Kobe's Back 3.6 4.6 17.8% 101 Yes, won last 2 starts this year Yes

    8 Salutos Amigos 4.6 5.8 14.6% 104 Yes, won last 2 starts this year Yes

    5 Limousine Liberal 4.7 6.0 14.4% 100Yes, won last start this year in first start

    as 4-year old after 5-month layoffYes

    3 Calculator 6.2 7.8 11.4% 102Questionable, 1 of 3 this year but 0 for 2

    in last 2 startsYes

    7 Holy Boss 8.4 10.5 8.7% 100No, had not won in 4 starts run over the

    last 9 months?

    9 Catalina Red 14.1 17.4 5.4% 96Yes, won last start this year in first start

    as 4-year old after 6-month layoffYes

    4 Barbados 15.1 18.6 5.1% 100Questionable, 1 of 2 this year but win

    came in a slow race (88 BSF)?

    2 Squadron A 39.1 47.9 2.0% 96 No, no wins 2015-2016 No

    Source: Equibase, Daily Racing Form

    *Some fast horses seemingly lack the will to run in front of other horses.

  • Considering the foregoing

  • sholker [printed: August 29, 2007 8:03 AM] [saved: August 29, 2007 8:19 AM] C:\Documents and Settings\sholker\Desktop\Sholk\Presentation\Sholk Molecular Diagnostics Presentation Final.ppt

    DudLess questions the consensus

    The 5 banana win bet paid 75.5

    bananas (30.2 / 2 x 5) and the 5

    banana place bet paid 34.5 bananas

    (13.8 / 2 x 5)

    Catalina Red (9)

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6uqejqlQaHghttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6uqejqlQaHg

  • Outstanding question

  • sholker [printed: August 29, 2007 8:03 AM] [saved: August 29, 2007 8:19 AM] C:\Documents and Settings\sholker\Desktop\Sholk\Presentation\Sholk Molecular Diagnostics Presentation Final.ppt

    Bet every Navarro entrant at 10-to-1 odds or higher?

    Not exactly sure

    This 12 banana exacta bet won if

    any combination of the 3,4,8 or 9

    horses finished 1st and 2nd.

    1 banana on the winning

    combination paid 107.5 bananas.

    Catalina Red (9)Calculator (3)

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6uqejqlQaHghttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6uqejqlQaHg

  • Recitals – Race 10 – 2016 Pat Day Mile Stakes

  • sholker [printed: August 29, 2007 8:03 AM] [saved: August 29, 2007 8:19 AM] C:\Documents and Settings\sholker\Desktop\Sholk\Presentation\Sholk Molecular Diagnostics Presentation Final.ppt

    Whereas,

    14 thoroughbreds competed in the 2016 Pat Day Mile Stakes, a Grade III stakes

    race on the Kentucky Derby undercard

    2016 Pat Day Mile Stakes - Final odds

    Horse # Horse name Post-takeout implied win %

    1 Discreetness 28.5 to 1.0 1.0 in 29.5 3.4%

    2 Ralis 30.6 to 1.0 1.0 in 31.6 3.2%

    3 Torrontes 61.9 to 1.0 1.0 in 62.9 1.6%

    4 Gray Sky 29.8 to 1.0 1.0 in 30.8 3.2%

    5 Imperial Hint 7.6 to 1.0 1.0 in 8.6 11.6%

    6 Sharp Azteca 13.1 to 1.0 1.0 in 14.1 7.1%

    7 Forevamo 8.5 to 1.0 1.0 in 9.5 10.5%

    8 American Dubai 61.8 to 1.0 1.0 in 62.8 1.6%

    9 Fellowship 6.9 to 1.0 1.0 in 7.9 12.7%

    10 Cocked and Loaded 7.2 to 1.0 1.0 in 8.2 12.2%

    11 American Freedom 1.4 to 1.0 1.0 in 2.4 41.7%

    12 Unbridled Outlaw 17.4 to 1.0 1.0 in 18.4 5.4%

    13 Star Hill 14.7 to 1.0 1.0 in 15.7 6.4%

    14 Lookin for a Kiss 55.7 to 1.0 1.0 in 56.7 1.8%

    Source: Equibase Check 122.3%

    Takeout

    18.2%

    Horse # Horse name Bettor-implied win probability

    1 Discreetness 35.1 to 1.0 1.0 in 36.1 2.8%

    2 Ralis 37.7 to 1.0 1.0 in 38.7 2.6%

    3 Torrontes 75.9 to 1.0 1.0 in 76.9 1.3%

    4 Gray Sky 36.7 to 1.0 1.0 in 37.7 2.7%

    5 Imperial Hint 9.5 to 1.0 1.0 in 10.5 9.5%

    6 Sharp Azteca 16.2 to 1.0 1.0 in 17.2 5.8%

    7 Forevamo 10.6 to 1.0 1.0 in 11.6 8.6%

    8 American Dubai 75.8 to 1.0 1.0 in 76.8 1.3%

    9 Fellowship 8.7 to 1.0 1.0 in 9.7 10.3%

    10 Cocked and Loaded 9.0 to 1.0 1.0 in 10.0 10.0%

    11 American Freedom 1.9 to 1.0 1.0 in 2.9 34.1%

    12 Unbridled Outlaw 21.5 to 1.0 1.0 in 22.5 4.4%

    13 Star Hill 18.2 to 1.0 1.0 in 19.2 5.2%

    14 Lookin for a Kiss 68.4 to 1.0 1.0 in 69.4 1.4%

    Source: Equibase, analyst adjustments Check 100.0%

    Actual odds on win bet Implied win probability

    0% takeout odds on win bet Implied win probability

  • sholker [printed: August 29, 2007 8:03 AM] [saved: August 29, 2007 8:19 AM] C:\Documents and Settings\sholker\Desktop\Sholk\Presentation\Sholk Molecular Diagnostics Presentation Final.ppt

    Whereas,

    One horse, Sharp Azteca (6), was entered by trainer Jorge Navarro, whose 2016

    win rate of 31% was higher than every other trainer with entrants in the race and all

    but two trainers in the United States with more than 100 starts

    While it’s true trainers and

    jockeys don’t win races, we

    do put horses in positions to

    win races. In that regard, I’ve

    been among the very best

    trainers in the US in 2016.

    Source: Equibase (link)

    https://www.equibase.com/profiles/Results.cfm?type=People&searchType=T&eID=264779https://www.equibase.com/profiles/Results.cfm?type=People&searchType=T&eID=264779https://www.equibase.com/stats/View.cfm?tf=year&tb=trainer&rbt=TB

  • sholker [printed: August 29, 2007 8:03 AM] [saved: August 29, 2007 8:19 AM] C:\Documents and Settings\sholker\Desktop\Sholk\Presentation\Sholk Molecular Diagnostics Presentation Final.ppt

    Whereas,

    Bettors bid up Sharp Azteca’s win bet odds to 13-1 (16-1 pre-takeout), which

    implied the Navarro-entered horse had a far lower ~6% chance to win, meaning

    bettors collectively believed clearly superior horses to Sharp Azteca were entered

    Horse # Horse name Bettor-implied win probability

    11 American Freedom 1.9 to 1.0 1.0 in 2.9 34.1%

    9 Fellowship 8.7 to 1.0 1.0 in 9.7 10.3%

    10 Cocked and Loaded 9.0 to 1.0 1.0 in 10.0 10.0%

    5 Imperial Hint 9.5 to 1.0 1.0 in 10.5 9.5%

    7 Forevamo 10.6 to 1.0 1.0 in 11.6 8.6%

    6 Sharp Azteca 16.2 to 1.0 1.0 in 17.2 5.8%

    13 Star Hill 18.2 to 1.0 1.0 in 19.2 5.2%

    12 Unbridled Outlaw 21.5 to 1.0 1.0 in 22.5 4.4%

    1 Discreetness 35.1 to 1.0 1.0 in 36.1 2.8%

    4 Gray Sky 36.7 to 1.0 1.0 in 37.7 2.7%

    2 Ralis 37.7 to 1.0 1.0 in 38.7 2.6%

    14 Lookin for a Kiss 68.4 to 1.0 1.0 in 69.4 1.4%

    8 American Dubai 75.8 to 1.0 1.0 in 76.8 1.3%

    3 Torrontes 75.9 to 1.0 1.0 in 76.9 1.3%

    Source: Equibase, analyst adjustments Check 100.0%

    0% takeout odds on win bet Implied win probability

    Of every 100 bananas bet to win,

    Sharp Azteca took only 5.8. Prior

    to race start, bettors believed 5

    other horses had a better chance

    to win, with 1 of those 5

    overwhelmingly favored.

  • sholker [printed: August 29, 2007 8:03 AM] [saved: August 29, 2007 8:19 AM] C:\Documents and Settings\sholker\Desktop\Sholk\Presentation\Sholk Molecular Diagnostics Presentation Final.ppt

    Whereas,

    None of the other horses’ past performances suggested they were clearly superior

    to Sharp Azteca

    American Freedom’s speed was notable but a win bet was overvalued at 1.4-to-1 (favorites win 1 in 3

    races, so should not be bet below 2-to-1 odds). Imperial Hint and Sharp Azteca had lower Beyer Speed

    Figures but had earned them in easy wins, which suggested they may run faster if put to a tougher test.

    Horse # Horse namePost-takeout

    win bet final odds

    Pre-takout

    win bet final odds

    Bettor-implied win

    probability

    Highest 2016

    Beyer Speed Figure Will to win?* Potential winner?

    11 American Freedom 1.4 1.9 34.1% 98 Yes, won only start Yes

    9 Fellowship 6.9 8.7 10.3% 87 No, 2 of 11 lifetime, lost last 6 starts ?

    10 Cocked and Loaded 7.2 9.0 10.0% 82Questionable, 3rd in only start this year,

    last win 7 months and 3 starts backNo

    5 Imperial Hint 7.6 9.5 9.5% 93Yes, won last 2 starts this year by 6 3/4 and

    4 1/4 lengthsYes

    7 Forevamo 8.5 10.6 8.6% 89No, 1 of 7 lifetime, placed in 2 of last 4

    starts but had not won in ~5 months ?

    6 Sharp Azteca 13.1 16.2 5.8% 88Yes, won last 2 starts this year by 7 1/2 and

    4 lengthsYes

    13 Star Hill 14.7 18.2 5.2% 88Questionable, won 3 months and 3 starts

    back, finished 3rd and 5th in last 2?

    12 Unbridled Outlaw 17.4 21.5 4.4% 88 No, 1 of 6 lifetime, lost last 4 starts No

    1 Discreetness 28.5 35.1 2.8% 86Questionable, won 2 by a neck and a nose

    4 months back, lost last 3 badlyNo

    4 Gray Sky 29.8 36.7 2.7% 84 No, 1 of 9 lifetime, lost last 4 starts No

    2 Ralis 30.6 37.7 2.6% 80 No, 2 of 9 lifetime, lost last 4 badly No

    14 Lookin for a Kiss 55.7 68.4 1.4% 77Questionable, 1 of 3 lifetime, lost last

    start badly after drop to low win % trainerNo

    8 American Dubai 61.8 75.8 1.3% 88No, 1 of 3 lifetime, lost last 4 starts with

    regression, lost last 2 by 13+ lengthsNo

    3 Torrontes 61.9 75.9 1.3% 83Questionable, 2 of 6 lifetime, won last

    start, lost 2 previous starts badlyNo

    Source: Equibase, Daily Racing Form

    *Some fast horses seemingly lack the will to run in front of other horses.

  • Considering the foregoing

  • sholker [printed: August 29, 2007 8:03 AM] [saved: August 29, 2007 8:19 AM] C:\Documents and Settings\sholker\Desktop\Sholk\Presentation\Sholk Molecular Diagnostics Presentation Final.ppt

    DudLess questions the consensus

    The 10 banana win bet paid 141

    bananas (28.2 x 5) and the 10

    banana place bet paid 66 bananas

    (13.2 x 5).

    Sharp Azteca (6)

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1y0lWTHuJmwhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1y0lWTHuJmw

  • Outstanding question

  • sholker [printed: August 29, 2007 8:03 AM] [saved: August 29, 2007 8:19 AM] C:\Documents and Settings\sholker\Desktop\Sholk\Presentation\Sholk Molecular Diagnostics Presentation Final.ppt

    Bet every Navarro entrant at 10-to-1 odds or higher?

    Not exactly sure

    Sharp Azteca (6)Forevamo (7)

    This 10 banana exacta bet won if

    the 5 or 6 horse finished 1st and

    any of the 5,6,7,11,12 or 13 horses

    finished 2nd. 1 banana on the

    winning combination paid 94.6

    bananas.

    This 12 banana exacta bet won if

    any combination of the 5,6 or 7

    horses finished 1st and 2nd.

    2 bananas on the winning

    combination paid 189.2 bananas.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1y0lWTHuJmwhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1y0lWTHuJmw

  • sholker [printed: August 29, 2007 8:03 AM] [saved: August 29, 2007 8:19 AM] C:\Documents and Settings\sholker\Desktop\Sholk\Presentation\Sholk Molecular Diagnostics Presentation Final.ppt

    DudLess