DS 102 2011

12
DS 102: Perspectives in Development II Politics and Development Development Studies Program School of Social Sciences Ateneo de Manila University 1 st Semester, SY 2011-12 Dr. Benjamin T. Tolosa, Jr. [email protected] Course Description and Objectives By introducing students to various perspectives in the study of politics and development, the course seeks to underline the crucial importance of the ‘political’ in the development process. Particular attention shall be devoted to two theoretical and empirical issues which are at the center of contemporary debates in the field: the significance, nature and role of the state, and the challenges and dilemmas of democratization. The aim is not to privilege certain norms and forms of ‘political development’ as the goal or ideal, but instead to problematize these conceptions and institutions themselves, and how they have emerged historically and with what implications. Part of the task is to analyze political change as it relates with global processes of capitalist development and how political development shapes and is shaped by social relations and hierarchies at various levels. We shall draw on the theoretical and empirical material examined in the readings and discussions to think critically about politics and development in the Philippines from a comparative perspective. Course Requirements and Grading System Class Participation and Reports 10% Quizzes 10% Group Research and Presentation 20% Mid-term Exam 30% Final Exam 30% 100% Consultation Hours: 9:30-11:00 am ThF or by appointment

Transcript of DS 102 2011

Page 1: DS 102 2011

DS 102: Perspectives in Development II

Politics and Development

Development Studies Program School of Social Sciences

Ateneo de Manila University

1st Semester, SY 2011-12 Dr. Benjamin T. Tolosa, Jr.

[email protected] Course Description and Objectives

By introducing students to various perspectives in the study of politics and development, the course seeks to underline the crucial importance of the ‘political’ in the development process. Particular attention shall be devoted to two theoretical and empirical issues which are at the center of contemporary debates in the field: the significance, nature and role of the state, and the challenges and dilemmas of democratization. The aim is not to privilege certain norms and forms of ‘political development’ as the goal or ideal, but instead to problematize these conceptions and institutions themselves, and how they have emerged historically and with what implications. Part of the task is to analyze political change as it relates with global processes of capitalist development and how political development shapes and is shaped by social relations and hierarchies at various levels. We shall draw on the theoretical and empirical material examined in the readings and discussions to think critically about politics and development in the Philippines from a comparative perspective. Course Requirements and Grading System Class Participation and Reports 10% Quizzes 10% Group Research and Presentation 20% Mid-term Exam 30% Final Exam 30% 100% Consultation Hours: 9:30-11:00 am ThF or by appointment

Page 2: DS 102 2011

2

Basic References Tornquist, O. (1999) Politics and Development. Sage Publications. Randall, V. and R. Theobald (1998) Political Change and Underdevelopment. Duke

University Press. Outline and Reading List A. Introduction: Politics and the Study of Development Tornquist, Chs. 1-3

Randall and Theobald, “Introduction”. Brett, E.A. (2009) Reconstructing Development Theory. Basingstoke: Palgrave

Macmillan, Introduction and Chs. 1-3. Schuurman, F. (2009) “Critical Development Theory: Moving Out of the Twilight Zone”

Third World Quarterly 30(5): 831-848. Leftwich, A. (2006) “Politics in Command: Development Studies and the Rediscovery of

Social Science” in A. Payne (ed.) Key Debates in Political Economy. London: Routledge.

Toye, J. (1993) Dilemmas of Development. Blackwell Publishers, Ch. 1. Clapham, C. (1988) Third World Politics. Routledge., Chs. 1-3 Sivanandan, T. (2004) “Anticolonialism, national liberation, and postcolonial nation

formation” in N. Lazarus (ed.) Cambridge Companion to Postcolonial Literary Studies. Cambridge University Press.

B. Does Socioeconomic Modernization lead to Political Development? Arguments and Counter-arguments

1. Modernization and Political Development Theory Tornquist, Chs. 5-6 Randall and Theobald, Chs. 1-3 Huntington, S. (1965). “Political Development and Political Decay” World

Politics 17(3): 386-430.

Snuffleupagus
Page 3: DS 102 2011

3

Leys, C. (1996) “Samuel Huntington and the End of Classical Modernization Theory” in The Rise and Fall of Development Theory. Indiana University Press.

Hagopian, P. (2000). “Political Development, Revisited” Comparative Political

Studies 33(6/7): 880-911. Cammack, P. (1997) Capitalism and Democracy in the Third World, Chs. 2-5, 7. 2. Dependency and the Politics of Underdevelopment

Tornquist, Ch. 7 Randall and Theobald, Ch. 4 Munck, R. (1999) “Dependency and Imperialism in the New Times: A Latin

American Perspective,” European Journal of Development Research. 11(1): 56-74.

________. (2009) “Democracy and Development in a Globalized World: Thinking About Latin America from Within” Studies in Comparative

International Development 44: 337-358. Cardoso, F. H. (2009) “New Paths: Globalization in Historical Perspective”

Studies in Comparative International Development 44: 296–317. Heller, P., D. Rueschemeyer and R. Snyder (2009) “Dependency and

Development in a Globalized World: Looking Back and Forward” Studies in Comparative International Development 44: 287-295.

Evans, P. (2009) “From Situations of Dependency to Globalized Social

Democracy” Studies in Comparative International Development 44: 318-36.

Harriss, J. (2009) “How Much Space is there for Political Agency in Dependent

Economies? Reflections on Papers on Contemporary Development Inspired by Cardoso and Faletto’s Dependencia y Desarrollo en America Latina” Studies in Comparative International Development 44: 435-440.

C. What is the Role of States in Socioeconomic Transformation?

1. An Overview of Perspectives on the State: History and Theory Tornquist, Ch. 8 Randall and Theobald, Ch. 5

Snuffleupagus
Page 4: DS 102 2011

4

King, R. and G. Kendall (2004) The State, Democracy and Globalization.

Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, Chs. 1-3. Hay, C. and M. Lister (2006) “Introduction: Theories of the State” in Hay, Lister

and Marsh (eds.) The State: Theories and Issues. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Hay, C. (2006) “(What’s Marxist about) Marxist State Theory?” in Hay, Lister

and Marsh (eds.) The State: Theories and Issues. Held, D. (1984) “Central Perspectives on the Modern State” in McLennan et. al.

(eds.) The Idea of the Modern State. Open University Press. ________. (1992/2003). “The Development of the Modern State” in S. Hall and

B. Gieben (eds.) Formations of Modernity. Polity Press and Open University.

Anderson, B. (2003) Imagined Communities. Anvil, Chs. 1, 3, 10. Scott, J. (1998) “Cities, People, and Language” in Seeing Like A State. Yale

University Press, Ch. 2. 2. The Neoliberal Counterrevolution and its Aftermath Tornquist, Ch. 9 Hindmoor, A. (2006) “Public Choice” in Hay, Lister and Marsh (eds.) The State:

Theories and Issues. Smith, M. (2006) “Pluralism” in Hay, Lister and Marsh (eds.) The State: Theories

and Issues. King, R. and G. Kendall (2004) The State, Democracy and Globalization.

Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, Chs. 8. Brett, E.A. (2009) Reconstructing Development Theory. Part II. Przeworski, A. (1992) “The Neoliberal Fallacy” Journal of Democracy 3(3): 45-

59. Minogue, M. (2002) “Power to the People? Good Governance and the Reshaping

of the State” in Kothari and Minogue (eds.) Williams, D. (1996) “Governance and the Discipline of Development,” European

Journal of Development Research. 8(2): 157-177.

Snuffleupagus
Snuffleupagus
Snuffleupagus
Snuffleupagus
Snuffleupagus
Page 5: DS 102 2011

5

Goldsmith, A. (2011) “No Country Left Behind?: Performance Standards and

Accountability in US Foreign Assistance” Development Policy Review 29(S1): 157-176.

Grindle, M. (2011) “Good Enough Governance Revisited” Development Policy

Review 29(S1):199-176. Robison, R., G. Rodan, and K. Hewison. (2005) “Transplanting the neoliberal

state in Southeast Asia” in R. Boyd and T. Ngo (eds.) Asian States: Beyond the Developmental Perspective. Routledge.

Cammack, P. (2002) “Neoliberalism, the World Bank and the New Politics of

Development” in U. Kothari and M. Minogue (eds.) Development Theory and Practice. Palgrave.

Jayasuriya, K. and K. Hewison (2006) “The Antipolitics of Good Governance” in

G. Rodan and K. Hewison (eds.) Neoliberalism and Conflict in Asia after 9/11. Routledge.

Fine, B. (2005) “Beyond the developmental state: Towards a political economy of

development” in Lapavitsas and Noguchi (eds.). Beyond Market-Driven Development. Routledge.

Jomo, K.S. (2005) “What remains of the East Asia model?” in C. Lapavitsas and

M. Noguchi (eds.). Borras, S. (2007) “'Free market', export-led development strategy and its impact

on rural livelihoods, poverty and inequality: The Philippine experience seen from a Southeast Asian perspective” Review of International Political Economy 14(1): 143-175.

Wade, R. (2008) “The First-World Debt Crisis of 2007–2010 in Global

Perspective” Challenge. 51(4) (July/August 2008): 23–54. Obama, B. (2009) “Remarks on the Economy” (14 April)

http://www.whitehouse.gov/the_press_office/Remarks-by-the-President-on-the-Economy-at-Georgetown-University/

Brassett, J., L. Rethel and M. Watson (2010) “The Political Economy of the

Subprime Crisis: The Economics, Politics and Ethics of Response” New Political Economy 15(1): 1-7.

Thompson, G. (2010) “ ‘Financial Globalisation' and the 'Crisis': A Critical

Assessment and 'What is to be Done'?” New Political Economy 15(1): 127-145.

Page 6: DS 102 2011

6

3. Neo-Weberian Approaches and their Implications Skocpol, T. (1985) “Bringing the State Back in: Strategies of Analysis in Current

Research” in P., Evans, D. Rueschemeyer and T. Skocpol (eds.) Bringing the State Back In. Cambridge University Press.

Evans, M (2006) “Elitism” in Hay, Lister and Marsh (eds.) The State: Theories

and Issues. Amsden, A. (1985) “The State and Taiwan’s Economic Development” in Evans,

Rueschemeyr and Skocpol. Wade, R. (1992) “East Asia’s Economic Success: Conflicting Perspectives,

Partial Insights, Shaky Evidence” World Politics 44(2): 270-320. Hutchcroft, P. (1991) “Oligarchs and Cronies in the Philippine State: The Politics

of Patrimonial Plunder” World Politics 43(3): 414-450. ________. (1997) “The Politics of Privilege: Assessing the Impact of Rents,

Corruption and Clientelism on Third World Development” Political Studies 45: 639-658.

________. (1998) Booty Capitalism: The Politics of Banking in the Philippines.

Quezon City: Ateneo de Manila University Press., Chs. 1-3; 10. Schneider, B. and S. Maxfield (1997) “Business, the State and Economic

Performance in Developing Countries” in Maxfield, S. and B. Schneider (eds.) (1997) Business and the State in Developing Countries. Cornell University Press.

Evans, P. (1997) “State Structures, Government-Business Relations and

Economic Transformation” in Maxfield and Schneider (eds.). _________. (1996) “Government Action, Social Capital and Development:

Reviewing the Evidence on Synergy,” World Development. 24(6): 1119-1132.

4. The State, Globalization and Governance Randall and Theobald (1998), Ch. 6 King, R. and G. Kendall (2004) The State, Democracy and Globalization.

Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, Chs. 6-7.

Snuffleupagus
Snuffleupagus
Page 7: DS 102 2011

7

Scholte, J. (1996) “Beyond the Buzzword: Towards a Critical Theory of Globalization” in E. Kofman and G. Youngs (eds.) Globalization: Theory and Practice. London: Pinter.

Cerny, P. (2000) “Restructuring the Political Arena: Globalization and the

Paradoxes of the Competition State” in R. Germain (ed.) Globalization and its Critics: Perspectives from Political Economy. Basingstoke: Macmillan Press.

Rosenau, J. (2002) “Governance in a New Global Order” in D. Held.and A.

McGrew (eds.) Governing Globalization. Cambridge: Polity Press. Evans, P. (1997) “The Eclipse of the State? Reflections on Stateness in an Era of

Globalization” World Politics 50(1): 62-87. Held, D. (2010) “Global Challenges: Accountability and Effectiveness” in C. Hay

New Directions in Political Science. Basinstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Rochlin, J. (2007) “Latin America’s Left Turn and the New Strategic Landscape:

the case of Bolivia” Third World Quarterly 28(7): 1327-1342.

D. What Kinds of Institutions Promote Development? Tornquist, Chs. 10-11 Hall, P. and R. Taylor (1996) “Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms”

Political Studies. 44(5): 936-957. Schmidt, V. (2006) “Institutionalism” in Hay, Lister and Marsh (eds.) The State: Theories

and Issues. Brett, E.A. (2009) Reconstructing Development Theory. Basingstoke: Palgrave

Macmillan, Chs. 9-12, 14 and Conclusion Leftwich, A. and K. Sen (2011) “’Don’t Mourn: Organize’: Institutions and

Organizations in the Politics and Economics of Growth and Poverty-Reduction” Journal of International Development 23: 319-337.

Booth, D. (2011) “Aid, Institutions and Governance: What Have we Learned?”

Development Policy Review 29(S1): 5-26. Williams, G., A. Duncan, P. Landell-Mills and S. Unsworth (2011) “Politics and

Growth” Development Policy Review 29(S1): 29-55. Scharpf, F. (2000) “Institutions in Comparative Policy Research” Comparative Political

Studies 33(6/7).

Page 8: DS 102 2011

8

De Dios, E. and H. Esfahani (2001) “Centralization, Political Turnover and Investment in

the Philippines” in J.E. Campos (ed.) Corruption: The Boom and Bust of East Asia. Ateneo de Manila University Press.

Hutchcroft, P. (2001) “Centralization and Decentralization in Administration and

Politics: Assessing Territorial Dimensions of Authority and Power” Governance: An International Journal of Policy and Administration 14(1): 23–53.

Li, S. and J. Wu (2010) “Why Some Countries Thrive Despite Corruption: The Role of

Trust in the Corruption-Efficiency Relationship” Review of International Political Economy 17(1): 129-154.

Fabella, R. (2006) “What Happens Institutions Do Not Work: Jueteng, Crises of

Presidential Legitimacy, and Electoral Failures in the Philippines” Asian Economic Papers 5(3).

Theobald, R, P. Hutchroft et. al (2002) “Debate: Containing Corruption” New Political

Economy 7(3). Chang, H.. (2007). “Institutional Change and Economic Development: An Introduction”

and “Understanding the Relationship Between Institutions and Economic Development – Some Key Theoretical Issues.” in H. Chang (ed.) Institutional Change and Economic Development. UNU Press and Anthem.

Evans, P. (2007) “Extending the ‘Institutional’ Turn: Property, Politics, and Development

Trajectories” in Chang (ed.). Toye, J. (2007) “Modern Bureaucracy” in Chang (ed.). Epstein, G. (2007) “Central Banks as Agents of Economic Development” in Chang (ed). Di John, J. (2007) “The Political Economy of Taxation and Tax Reform in Developing

Countries” in Chang (ed.). Sinclair, T. (1999) “Deficit Discourse: The Social Construction of Financial Rectitude,”

in R. Germain (ed.). Porter, T. (1999) “The Late-Modern Knowledge Structure and World Politics,” in M.

Hewson and T. Sinclair (eds.). Approaches to Global Governance Theory. SUNY Press.

Tolosa, B. (2004) “Representations of the Philippine Stock Market and Securities

Research, and Global Financial Regularization” Philippine Studies 52(1): 3-42.

Page 9: DS 102 2011

9

E. What are the Dilemmas of Democratization in the South? Is Democracy Compatible with Development? What Kinds of Institutions and Political Actors Facilitate Democratization?

Tornquist, Chs. 12-13. Randall and Theobald, Ch. 5 (pp.216-221) King, R. and G. Kendall (2004) The State, Democracy and Globalization. Basingstoke:

Palgrave Macmillan, Ch. 4. Brett, E.A. (2009) Reconstructing Development Theory. Basingstoke: Palgrave

Macmillan, Chs. 5, 13. Schmitter, P. and T.L. Karl (1991) “What Democracy Is… And Is Not” Journal of

Democracy 2(3). Schmitter, P. (2004) “The Ambiguous Virtues of Accountability” Journal of Democracy

15(4). Shin, D.C. (1994) “On the Third Wave of Democratization: A Synthesis and Evaluation

of Recent Theory and Research” World Politics. 47(1): 135-170. Diamond, L. (2008) “The Democratic Rollback: The Resurgence of the Predatory State”

Foreign Affairs (March-April). ________. (2004) “The Quality of Democracy: An Overview” Journal of Democracy

15(4). Leftwich, A., E. Huber, M.H. Khan, J. Grugel, and B. Hettne (2002) “Debate: Democracy

and Development” New Political Economy 7(2): 269-281. Leftwich, A. (2005) “Democracy and development: Is there institutional

incompatibility?” Democratization. 12(5): 686–703. Power, T. and M. Gasiorowski (1997) “Institutional Design and Democratic

Consolidation in the Third World” Comparative Political Studies 30(2):123-155. Valenzuela, A. (2004) “Latin American Presidencies Interrupted” Journal of Democracy

15(4). Croissant, A. (2003) “Legislative Powers, Veto Players and the Emergence of Delegative

Democracy: A Comparison of Presidentialism in the Philippines and South Korea” Democratization 10(3): 68-98.

Snuffleupagus
Page 10: DS 102 2011

10

Haggard, S. and R. Kaufman (1995) The Political Economy of Democratic Transitions. Princeton University Press (see Introduction and Part III).

Rueschemeyer, D., E. Stephens and J. Stephens (1992) Capitalist Development and

Democracy. University of Chicago Press., Ch. 4 Rueschemeyer, D. (2004) “Addressing Inequality” Journal of Democracy 15(4). Huber, E., D. Rueschemeyer and J. Stephens (1997) “The Paradoxes of Contemporary

Democracy: Formal, Participatory and Social Dimensions” Comparative Politics 29(3): 323-342.

Moore, M. (1996) “Is Democracy Rooted in Material Prosperity?” in Luckham and White

(eds). Democratization in the South. Manchester. Przeworski, A., M. Alvarez, J. Cheibub and F. Limongi (1996) “What Makes

Democracies Endure?” Journal of Democracy 7(1):39-55. White, G. (1996) “Civil Society, Democratization and Development” in Luckham and

White (eds.) Democratization in the South. Manchester. ________. (1995) “Towards a Democratic Developmental State” IDS Bulletin 26(2)

1995: 27-36. Loh, F. (2008) “Procedural democracy, participatory democracy and regional

networking: the multi-terrain struggle for democracy in Southeast Asia” Inter-Asia Cultural Studies 9(1).

Ufen, A. (2008) “Political party and party system institutionalization in Southeast Asia:

lessons for democratic consolidation in Indonesia, the Philippines and Thailand” Pacific Review 21(3): 327-350.

Case, W. (2007) “Democracy’s Quality and Breakdown: New Lessons from Thailand”

Democratization 14(4): 622–642. Thitinan Pongsudhirak (2008) “Thailand Since the Coup” Journal of Democracy 19(4):

140-153. Sandbrook, R., M. Edelman, P. Heller and J. Teichman (2007) Social Democracy in the

Global Periphery: Origins, Challenges and Prospects. Cambridge, Parts I and III. Castaneda, J. (2006) “Latin America’s Left Turn” Foreign Affairs 85(3): 28-43. Leiras, M. (2007) “Latin America’s Electoral Turn: Left, Right and Wrong” Constellations

14(3).

Lynch, N. (2007) “What ‘Left’ Means in Latin America Now” Constellations 14(3).

Page 11: DS 102 2011

11

Arditi, B. (2008) “Arguments about the Left Turns in Latin America: A Post-Liberal Politics?” Latin American Research Review 43(3).

Murray, J., M. Cameron and E. Hershberg (2009) “Latin America’s Left Turns: An

Introduction” Third World Quarterly 30(2): 319–330. Cameron, M. (2009) “Latin America’s Left Turns: Beyond Good and Bad” Third World

Quarterly 30(2): 331–348. French, J. (2009) “Understanding the Politics of Latin America’s Plural Lefts

(Chavez/Lula)” Third World Quarterly 30(2): 349-370. Luna, J. and F. Filgueira (2009) “The Left Turns as Multiple Paradigmatic Crises” Third

World Quarterly 30(2): 371–395. Elshtain, J. B. (2009) “Religion and Democracy” Journal of Democracy 20(2): 5-17. Brown, D. and T. Cheng (2005/06) “Religious Organizations and Democratic

Consolidation” International Journal of the Humanities 3(11). Carothers, T. (2009) “Democracy Assistance: Political vs. Developmental?” Journal of

Democracy, 20(1): 5-19. Blair, H. (2004) “Assessing Civil Society Impact for Democracy Programmes”

Democratization 11(1): 77-103. Kapstein, E. and N. Converse (2008) “Why Democracies Fail” Journal of Democracy

19(4): 57-68. F. The Philippines: Politics, Development and Democracy Hutchcroft, P. (1999) “After the Fall: Prospects for Political and Institutional Reform in

Post-Crisis Thailand and the Philippines” Government and Opposition ________. (2008) “The Arroyo Imbroglio in the Philippines” Journal of Democracy

19(1). ________. and J. Rocamora (2003) “Strong Demands and Weak Institutions: The Origins

and Evolution of the Democratic Deficit in the Philippines” Journal of East Asian Studies. 3: 259–292.

Dimond, P. (2006) “The Philippines: Fragile Democracy or Strong Republic?” Asian

Affairs 37(2): 210-219. Reid, B. (2006) “Historical Blocs and Democratic Impasse in the Philippines: 20 years

Page 12: DS 102 2011

12

after ‘people power’” Third World Quarterly 27(6): 1003-1020. Rogers, S. (2004) “Philippine Politics and the Rule of Law” Journal of Democracy 15(4). Montinola, G. (1999) “Parties and Accountability in the Philippines” Journal of

Democracy 10(1): 126-140. Magadia, J. (2003) State-Society Dynamics: Policy Making in a Restored Democracy.

Quezon City: Ateneo de Manila University Press. Eaton, K. (2003) “Restoration or Transformation? ‘Trapos’ versus NGOs in the

Democratization of the Philippines” The Journal of Asian Studies, 62(2): 469-496.

Rüland, J. (2003) “Constitutional Debates in the Philippines: From Presidentialism to

Parliamentarianism?” Asian Survey 43(3): 461-484. Quimpo, N. (2005) “The Left, Elections, and the Political Party System in the

Philippines” Critical Asian Studies 37(1): 3-28. Rivera, T. (2002) “Transition Pathways and Democratic Consolidation in Post-Marcos

Philippines” Contemporary Southeast Asia 24(3): 466-483. Zialcita, F. (1997) “Barriers and Bridges to a Democratic Culture” in M. S. Diokno (ed.)

Democracy and Citizenship in Filipino Culture. Third World Studies Center. Karaos, A. (1997) “Perceptions and Practices of Democracy and Citizenship Among

Urban Middle Class Families” in Diokno (ed.). Bautista, C. (2001) “People Power 2: ‘The Revenge of the Elite on the Masses’?” in A.

Doronila (ed.) Between Fires. Inquirer Books. Hernandez, C. (2001) “Reflections on the Role of the Military in People Power 2” in A.

Doronila (ed.). Coronel, S., Y. Chua, L. Rimban and B. Cruz (2004) The Rulemakers: How the Wealthy

and Well-Born Dominate Congress. Quezon City: Philippine Center for Investigative Journalism.

Snuffleupagus
Snuffleupagus