Drug resistant gram-negative bacteria

download Drug resistant gram-negative bacteria

of 51

Transcript of Drug resistant gram-negative bacteria

  • 7/30/2019 Drug resistant gram-negative bacteria

    1/51

    Dr.T.V.Rao MD

    DRUG RESISTANT GRAM-NEGATIVE

    BACTERIA

    08-12-2012DR.T.V.RAO MD 1

  • 7/30/2019 Drug resistant gram-negative bacteria

    2/51

    Bugs, No Drugs: No ESKAPE

    Enterococcus faecium (E), Staphylococcus aureus (S), Klebsiella

    pneumoniae (K),Acinetobacter baumannii(A), Pseudomonas aeruginosa

    (P), and Enterobacterspp. (E)ate-stage clinical development

    pipeline remains unacceptably lean

    Some important molecules for problematic pathogens

    such as MRSA

    Few novel molecules for other ESKAPE pathogens

    No new drugs for infection due to multidrug-resistant Gram-negative

    bacilli (eg,A. baumanniiand P. aeruginosa)

    None represent more than an incremental advance over currently

    available therapies

    NO ESKAPE ? FROM PATHOGENS

    08-12-2012DR.T.V.RAO MD 2

  • 7/30/2019 Drug resistant gram-negative bacteria

    3/51

    EXTENDED-SPECTRUM -LACTAMASES (ESBLS):

    THE FORGOTTEN (AND UNDERRATED) MDR GNB

    Most commonly identified in enterobacteriaceae

    Plasmid-mediated

    Impart decreased susceptibility to -lactam

    antimicrobials

    Often co-resistance to aminoglycosides,fluoroquinolones

    Carbapenems are drugs of choice for invasive

    infections due to ESBL-producers 08-12-2012DR.T.V.RAO MD 3

  • 7/30/2019 Drug resistant gram-negative bacteria

    4/51

    ESBLs are enzymes

    capable of

    hydrolysing

    penicillins, broad-

    spectrum

    cephalosporins and

    Monobactams, andare generally derived

    from TEM and SHV-

    type enzymes

    WHAT ARE ESBL

    08-12-2012DR.T.V.RAO MD 4

  • 7/30/2019 Drug resistant gram-negative bacteria

    5/51

    ALEXANDER FLEMINGNOBEL LECTURE, DECEMBER 11, 1945

    It arose simply from a fortunate occurrence which happened when I

    was working on a purely academic bacteriological problem which had

    nothing to do with antagonism, or moulds, or antiseptics, or

    antibiotics.

    www.nobelprize.org

    Google images

    08-12-2012DR.T.V.RAO MD 5

  • 7/30/2019 Drug resistant gram-negative bacteria

    6/51

    Abx Penicillin

    Cephalosporin

    Monobactam

    Carbapenem

    Bactericidal

    WHAT IS A BETA-LACTAM?

    Google Images

    08-12-2012DR.T.V.RAO MD 6

  • 7/30/2019 Drug resistant gram-negative bacteria

    7/51

    Enterobacteriaceae

    Resistance to

    oxyimino-

    cephalosporins andmonobactams but

    not cephamycins and

    carbamenems

    Susceptible to

    beta-lactamase

    inhibitors

    ESBLS

    Oteo, et al., 201008-12-2012DR.T.V.RAO MD 7

  • 7/30/2019 Drug resistant gram-negative bacteria

    8/51

    SHV

    TEM

    CTX-M

    OXA

    AmpC

    GENES

    08-12-2012DR.T.V.RAO MD 8

  • 7/30/2019 Drug resistant gram-negative bacteria

    9/51

    CLASSIFICATION Ambler Classification

    Molecular class A D

    A

    Bush-Jacoby-Medeiros Classification

    Functional group 1 4

    2

    2b

    2be

    Paterson and Bonomo, 200508-12-2012DR.T.V.RAO MD 9

  • 7/30/2019 Drug resistant gram-negative bacteria

    10/51

    Mid 1980s

    Variants of TEM and

    SHV

    Breakdown 3rd

    generation

    cephalosporins

    Mainly in hospitalKlebsiella

    Spread world wide

    ESBL EVOLUTION

    1008-12-2012DR.T.V.RAO MD

  • 7/30/2019 Drug resistant gram-negative bacteria

    11/51

    ESBLs are often

    located on

    plasmids that aretransferable from

    strain to strain and

    between bacterialspecies.

    WHERE ESBL ARE LOCATED

    08-12-2012DR.T.V.RAO MD 11

  • 7/30/2019 Drug resistant gram-negative bacteria

    12/51

    Common ESBL worldwide, often produced by

    Escherichia coli

    Often causes UTI

    Now reported in US Healthcare associated

    Some community

    Community-based ESBL infection raiseconcern for continued increases in

    carbapenem use

    CTX-M: ESBL EPIDEMIC

    08-12-2012DR.T.V.RAO MD 12

  • 7/30/2019 Drug resistant gram-negative bacteria

    13/51

    WHY WE NEED ESBL DETECTION

    ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae have been

    responsible for numerous outbreaks of infection

    throughout the world and pose challenging infection

    control issues. Clinical outcomes data indicate thatESBLs are clinically significant and, when detected,

    indicate the need for the use of appropriate

    antibacterial agents.

    Unfortunately, the laboratory detection of ESBLs can be

    complex and, at times, misleading.

    08-12-2012DR.T.V.RAO MD 13

  • 7/30/2019 Drug resistant gram-negative bacteria

    14/51

    ESBL PRODUCING BACTERIA ARE MORE

    COMPLEX ?

    Antibacterial choice is often complicated by

    multi-resistance. Many ESBLproducing

    organisms also expressAmpC -lactamases and may be co-transferredwith

    plasmids mediating aminoglycoside

    resistance. In addition, there is anincreasing association between ESBL

    production and fluoroquinolone resistance

    08-12-2012DR.T.V.RAO MD 14

  • 7/30/2019 Drug resistant gram-negative bacteria

    15/51

    08-12-2012DR.T.V.RAO MD 15

    DYNAMICS OF ANTIBIOTIC

    RESISTANCE

  • 7/30/2019 Drug resistant gram-negative bacteria

    16/51

    1st generation

    Extended-

    spectrum With or w/o

    beta-lactamase

    inhibitor Broad spectrum

    PENICILLINS

    08-12-2012DR.T.V.RAO MD 16

  • 7/30/2019 Drug resistant gram-negative bacteria

    17/51

    CEPHALOSPORINS

    Willey, et al., 2008

    1st

    2nd

    3rd

    4th

    08-12-2012DR.T.V.RAO MD 17

  • 7/30/2019 Drug resistant gram-negative bacteria

    18/51

    Although in in vitro tests

    ESBLs are inhibited by

    -lactamase inhibitors such

    as clavulanic acid, the

    activity of -lactam/-lactamase inhibitor

    combination agents is

    influenced by the bacterial

    inoculum, doseadministration regimen and

    specific type of ESBL

    present

    ESBL DYNAMICS

    08-12-2012DR.T.V.RAO MD 18

  • 7/30/2019 Drug resistant gram-negative bacteria

    19/51

    Beta-lactam

    Beta-lactamase

    Beta-lactamase

    inhibitor

    ESBL

    THE FIGHT

    Google Images

    08-12-2012DR.T.V.RAO MD 19

  • 7/30/2019 Drug resistant gram-negative bacteria

    20/51

    THE FIGHT

    BETA-LACTAM

    cell

    PG

    NO

    LYSIS08-12-2012DR.T.V.RAO MD 20

    THE FIGHT

  • 7/30/2019 Drug resistant gram-negative bacteria

    21/51

    THE FIGHT

    BETA-LACTAMASE

    cell

    PG

    NO

    beta-lactamase

    08-12-2012DR.T.V.RAO MD 21

  • 7/30/2019 Drug resistant gram-negative bacteria

    22/51

    THE FIGHT

    BETA-LACTAMASE

    cell

    PG

    NHO

    OH

    08-12-2012DR.T.V.RAO MD 22

  • 7/30/2019 Drug resistant gram-negative bacteria

    23/51

    THE FIGHT

    BETA-LACTAMASE INHIBITOR

    cell

    PG

    NO

    beta-lactamase

    Inhibitor

    08-12-2012DR.T.V.RAO MD 23

  • 7/30/2019 Drug resistant gram-negative bacteria

    24/51

    THE FIGHT

    BETA-LACTAMASE INHIBITOR

    cell

    PG

    NO

    beta-lactamase

    Inhibitor

    LYSIS08-12-2012DR.T.V.RAO MD 24

  • 7/30/2019 Drug resistant gram-negative bacteria

    25/51

    WHAT ARE EXTENDED-SPECTRUM

    -LACTAMASES?

    ESBLs are enzymes that mediate

    resistance to extended-spectrum (third

    generation) cephalosporins (e.g.,ceftazidime, cefotaxime, and ceftriaxone)

    and monobactams (e.g., aztreonam) but do

    not affect cephamycins (e.g., cefoxitin andcefotetan) or Carbapenems (e.g.,

    meropenem or imipenem

    08-12-2012DR.T.V.RAO MD 25

  • 7/30/2019 Drug resistant gram-negative bacteria

    26/51

    WHY SHOULD CLINICAL LABORATORY PERSONNEL BE

    CONCERNED ABOUT DETECTING THESE ENZYMES?

    The presence of an ESBL-producing organism in a clinicalinfection can result in treatment failure if one of the above

    classes of drugs is used. ESBLs can be difficult to detect

    because they have different levels of activity against

    various cephalosporins. Thus, the choice of whichantimicrobial agents to test is critical. For example, one

    enzyme may actively hydrolyze ceftazidime, resulting in

    ceftazidime minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of

    256 g/ml, but have poor activity on cefotaxime, producing

    MICs of only 4 g/ml. If an ESBL is detected, all penicillins,

    cephalosporins, and aztreonam should be reported as

    resistant, even if in vitro test results indicate susceptibility08-12-2012DR.T.V.RAO MD 26

  • 7/30/2019 Drug resistant gram-negative bacteria

    27/51

    HOW CAN CLINICAL LABORATORY

    PERSONNEL CONFIRM ESBL PRODUCTION?

    NCCLS recommends performing phenotypic confirmation of

    potential ESBL-producing isolates of K. pneumoniae, K.

    oxytoca, or E. coli by testing both cefotaxime and ceftazidime,

    alone and in combination with clavulanic acid . Testing can be

    performed by the broth micro dilution method or by diskdiffusion. For MIC testing, a decrease of > 3 doubling dilutions

    in an MIC for either cefotaxime or ceftazidime tested in

    combination with 4 g/ml clavulanic acid, versus its MIC when

    tested alone, confirms an ESBL-producing organism. For diskdiffusion testing, a > 5 mm increase in a zone diameter for either

    antimicrobial agent tested in combination with clavulanic acid

    versus its zone when tested alone confirms an ESBL-producing

    organism.08-12-2012DR.T.V.RAO MD 27

  • 7/30/2019 Drug resistant gram-negative bacteria

    28/51

    CLINICAL STRATEGY TO DETECT

    ESBL

    CTX CTX/CLA

    CAZ CAZ/CLA

  • 7/30/2019 Drug resistant gram-negative bacteria

    29/51

    NCCLS suggests making

    disks by adding 10 l of a

    1000 g/ml stock solution

    of clavulanic acid to

    cefotaxime and ceftazidimedisks each day of testing .

    In the future, commercial

    manufacturers of

    antimicrobial disks mayproduce disks containing

    cefotaxime and ceftazidime

    with clavulanic acid.

    HOW SHOULD LABORATORY PERSONNEL TEST FOR

    CEFOTAXIME AND CEFTAZIDIME IN COMBINATION WITH

    CLAVULANIC ACID?

    08-12-2012DR.T.V.RAO MD 29

  • 7/30/2019 Drug resistant gram-negative bacteria

    30/51

    Common ESBL worldwide, often produced by

    Escherichia coli

    Often causes UTI

    Now reported in US Healthcare associated

    Some community

    Community-based ESBL infection raise concern

    for continued increases in carbapenem use

    CTX-M: ESBL EPIDEMIC

    Urban, Diag Micro Infect Dis, 2010; Sjlund-Karlsson, EID, 201108-12-2012DR.T.V.RAO MD 30

  • 7/30/2019 Drug resistant gram-negative bacteria

    31/51

    CARBAPENEM RESISTANCE

    Emerging problem in Pseudomonasaeruginosa,Acinetobacter baumannii,Enterobacteriaceae (CRE)

    Risk factors include ICU stay, prolongedexposures to healthcare, indwelling devices,antibiotic exposures

    Long-term acute care centers (LTACs)

    Severely limits treatment options

    Increased use of older, toxic agents such ascolistin

    08-12-2012DR.T.V.RAO MD 31

  • 7/30/2019 Drug resistant gram-negative bacteria

    32/51

    KLEBSIELLA PNEUMONIAECARBAPENEMASES (KPCS)

    Plasmid-mediated carbapenemases

    KPC-producing strains ofKlebsiella pneumonia and other

    enterobacteriaceae

    KPC-2, KPC-3

    Endemicity in many locales in the US

    Hyperendemicity in NYC

    24% of K. pneumoniae infections were due to KPCs in 2

    hospitals

    Country-wide outbreak ongoing in Israel, Greece, Columbia and

    others

    *08-12-2012DR.T.V.RAO MD 32

  • 7/30/2019 Drug resistant gram-negative bacteria

    33/51

    KPCS (CONT)

    Might appear susceptible to imipenem ormeropenem, but with borderline MICs per 2009 CLSI

    breakpoints

    Usually Ertapenem resistant Modified Hodge test

    Usually only susceptible to colistin, Tigecycline and

    select aminoglycosides Easily spread in hospitals (often requires Cohorting of

    staff and patients to control)

    08-12-2012DR.T.V.RAO MD 33

  • 7/30/2019 Drug resistant gram-negative bacteria

    34/51

    Other isolates ofEnterobacteriaceae, suchas Salmonella species andProteus mirabilis, andisolates of Pseudomonasaeruginosa produceESBLs. However, at thistime, methods for screeningand phenotypicconfirmatory testing of

    these isolates have notbeen determined byNCCLS.

    DO ISOLATES OTHER THAN K. PNEUMONIAE,

    K. OXYTOCA, OR E. COLI PRODUCE ESBLS?

    08-12-2012DR.T.V.RAO MD 34

  • 7/30/2019 Drug resistant gram-negative bacteria

    35/51

    HOW SHOULD CEPHALOSPORIN AND

    PENICILLIN RESULTS BE REPORTED?

    08-12-2012DR.T.V.RAO MD 35

    If an isolate is confirmed as an ESBL-producer by the

    NCCLS-recommended phenotypic confirmatory test

    procedure, all penicillins, cephalosporins, and

    aztreonam should be reported as resistant. This listdoes not include the Cephamycins (cefotetan and

    cefoxitin), which should be reported according to their

    routine test results. If an isolate is not confirmed as an

    ESBL-producer, current recommendations suggestreporting results as for routine testing. Do not change

    interpretations of penicillins, cephalosporins, and

    aztreonam for isolates not confirmed as ESBL

    BACTERIA NOT TO TEST FOR

  • 7/30/2019 Drug resistant gram-negative bacteria

    36/51

    Acinetobacter

    Often S to clavulanate

    alone

    S. maltophila +ve resultby inhibition of L-2

    chromosomal b-

    lactamase, ubiquitous

    in the species

    BACTERIA NOT TO TEST FOR

    ESBLS

    08-12-2012DR.T.V.RAO MD 36

    NEW DELHI METALLO BETA LACTAMASE 1

  • 7/30/2019 Drug resistant gram-negative bacteria

    37/51

    NEW DELHI METALLO-BETA-LACTAMASE-1

    (NDM-1)

    Carbapenemases mediating broad spectrumresistance

    Usually found in Klebsiella pneumonia, E. coli

    Initially identified in India, Pakistan, Bangladesh

    Recovered in Australia, France, Japan, Kenya,

    North America, Singapore, Taiwan, and the United

    Kingdom, Australia, Canada

    Recovered in the US (Massachussetts, Illinois and

    California)08-12-2012DR.T.V.RAO MD 37

  • 7/30/2019 Drug resistant gram-negative bacteria

    38/51

    MDR GNB IN LONG TERM CARE

    Quinolone resistance increasingly common in

    hospitals, long-term care and in some community

    settings

    B-lactam resistance established in hospitals, many

    long-term care settings

    Risk factors in long-term care for resistant Gram-

    negative bacilli

    Indwelling devices Poor functional status

    Pressure ulcers/wounds

    Antimicrobial/quinolone exposure

    Prior hospitalization 08-12-2012DR.T.V.RAO MD 38

    STRATEGIES TO CONTROL THE

  • 7/30/2019 Drug resistant gram-negative bacteria

    39/51

    Contact

    precautions/hand

    hygiene

    Environment andsource control

    Antibiotic stewardship

    Enhanced infectioncontrol measures

    Bundles

    STRATEGIES TO CONTROL THE

    SPREAD OF MDR GNB

    08-12-2012DR.T.V.RAO MD 39

  • 7/30/2019 Drug resistant gram-negative bacteria

    40/51

    ROLE OF THE ENVIRONMENT

    Environmental sources of contamination/infection

    Increasingly recognized as sources of infection

    Particularly important with pathogens such asClostridium difficile, Norovirus,Acinetobacterspp.

    Bleach preparations are more effective for somepathogens (still need cleaning)

    Latest technology being tested: UV light,

    hydrogen peroxide vapor08-12-2012DR.T.V.RAO MD 40

  • 7/30/2019 Drug resistant gram-negative bacteria

    41/51

    ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANING Adequacy of cleaning of patients rooms

    suboptimal

    Improve monitoring and feedback of efficacy of

    cleaning

    Direct observation and culturing not efficient, time-

    consuming and expensive

    Other options: ATP bioluminescence andfluorescent dyes

    Monitor process, efficacy of cleaning08-12-2012DR.T.V.RAO MD 41

  • 7/30/2019 Drug resistant gram-negative bacteria

    42/51

    SUPPLEMENTS TO ROUTINE ENVIRONMENTAL

    CLEANING

    Disinfection units that decontaminate

    environmental surfaces

    Must remove debris and dirt in order forthese units to be effective

    Two most common methods

    UV light

    Hydrogen peroxide (HP)

    08-12-2012DR.T.V.RAO MD 42

  • 7/30/2019 Drug resistant gram-negative bacteria

    43/51

    Broad-spectrumantimicrobial disinfectant

    Preferred agent for skinpreparation prior to

    insertion of vascularcatheter and prior tosurgery

    Studied for source control,

    decrease in degree ofcontamination of patientsby problem hospitalpathogens

    CHLORHEXIDINE GLUCONATE (CHG)

    08-12-2012DR.T.V.RAO MD 43

  • 7/30/2019 Drug resistant gram-negative bacteria

    44/51

    ENHANCED INFECTION CONTROL PROCESSES

    Active Surveillance

    Use of screening cultures to identify patients colonized with

    pathogens (usually MDR) of interest

    Goal is to prevent spread in the hospital by identifying patients who

    are colonized and intervening to prevent spread Most experience is with Gram positive pathogens

    Limited use for some pathogens (due to low sensitivity)

    Cohorting of patients

    Dedicated staff

    08-12-2012DR.T.V.RAO MD 44

  • 7/30/2019 Drug resistant gram-negative bacteria

    45/51

    ANTIMICROBIAL STEWARDSHIP - GOALS

    Optimize appropriate use of antimicrobials The right agent, dose, timing, duration, route

    Optimize clinical outcomes

    Reduce emergence of resistance

    Limit drug-related adverse events

    Minimize risk of unintentional consequences

    Help reduce antimicrobial resistance

    The combination of effective antimicrobial stewardship andinfection control has been shown to limit the emergence andtransmission of antimicrobial-resistant bacteria

    Dellit TH et al. Clin Infect Dis. 2007;44(2):159177; . Drew RH. J Manag Care Pharm.2009;15(2 Suppl):S18S23; Drew RH et al. Pharmacotherapy. 2009;29(5):593607.

    08-12-2012DR.T.V.RAO MD 45

  • 7/30/2019 Drug resistant gram-negative bacteria

    46/51

    A bundle is a structuredway of improving theprocesses of care andpatient outcomes: a

    small, straightforwardset of evidence-basedpractices that, whenperformed collectivelyand reliably, have been

    proven to improvepatient outcomes.

    Resar R, Joint Commission Journalon ualit and Patient Safet .

    BUNDLES

    08-12-2012DR.T.V.RAO MD 46

  • 7/30/2019 Drug resistant gram-negative bacteria

    47/51

    CONCLUSIONS MDR GNB are growing in prevalence in multiple

    geographic locales Occur in a variety of healthcare associated

    settings

    Even in the community Antimicrobial stewardship is here to stay

    Problem is compounded by dry pharmaceutical

    pipeline Novel methods to control spread of MDROs are

    attractive but not clearly effective/cost-effective

    08-12-2012DR.T.V.RAO MD 47

    NEW DELHI METALLO BETA LACTAMASE 1

  • 7/30/2019 Drug resistant gram-negative bacteria

    48/51

    NEW DELHI METALLO-BETA-LACTAMASE-1

    (NDM-1)

    Carbapenemases mediating broad spectrumresistance

    Usually found in Klebsiella pneumonia, E. coli

    Initially identified in India, Pakistan, Bangladesh

    Recovered in Australia, France, Japan, Kenya,

    North America, Singapore, Taiwan, and the United

    Kingdom, Australia, Canada

    Recovered in the US (Massachussetts, Illinois and

    California)08-12-2012DR.T.V.RAO MD 48

  • 7/30/2019 Drug resistant gram-negative bacteria

    49/51

    STILL THE BEST WAY TO PREVENT SPREAD OF

    INFECTIONS AND DRUG RESISTANCE IS

    08-12-2012DR.T.V.RAO MD 49

  • 7/30/2019 Drug resistant gram-negative bacteria

    50/51

    VISIT ME FOR MORE ARTICLES OF INTEREST

    ON INFECTIOUS DISEASES

    08-12-2012DR.T.V.RAO MD 50

  • 7/30/2019 Drug resistant gram-negative bacteria

    51/51

    Programme Created by Dr.T.V.Rao MD

    for Microbiologists in the Developing

    World

    Email

    [email protected]