Dr. Robin Saha Study of the U.S. Institute University of Montana July 8, 2010.

26
Introduction to Environmental Politics and Policy Dr. Robin Saha Study of the U.S. Institute University of Montana July 8, 2010

Transcript of Dr. Robin Saha Study of the U.S. Institute University of Montana July 8, 2010.

Page 1: Dr. Robin Saha Study of the U.S. Institute University of Montana July 8, 2010.

Introduction to Environmental Politics and Policy

Dr. Robin SahaStudy of the U.S. Institute

University of MontanaJuly 8, 2010

Page 2: Dr. Robin Saha Study of the U.S. Institute University of Montana July 8, 2010.

TopicsFeatures of U.S. political system

Role of state governmentDefinitions – policy and power – sources of powerPublic policy theoriesHistoric periods of U.S. environmental policyMajor environmental policies in the U.S.Policy process / policy stages / policy cyclePolicy “actors” – strategies and tactics to

influence decision makersPolicy typologyGroup activity (if we have time)

Page 3: Dr. Robin Saha Study of the U.S. Institute University of Montana July 8, 2010.

Features of U.S. Political System1. Democratically-elected leaders

2. High level of citizen participation

3. Constitutional separation of powers among the executive, legislative, and judicial (3) branches – horizontal fragmentation

A. Federalism – federal supremacy over state government (hierarchy or levels of governmental authority), constitutionally-reserved state powers, with local powers deriving from state authority – vertical fragmentation

B. Resulting in dispersed and ever-contested power

4. Relatively open government

5. Primacy of individual (and corporate) freedom and private property rights

6. Constitutional guarantee of freedom of belief, expression, and the press, and rights to associate with others

7. Powerful organized interests

8. Short terms for elected officials

9. Campaign financing allowed

10. Enduring two-party systemTo read more, see: http://bensguide.gpo.gov/9-12/index.html

Page 4: Dr. Robin Saha Study of the U.S. Institute University of Montana July 8, 2010.

Public PolicyRepresents government’s attempt to address and/or solve perceived public problems and:

1. Includes the intentions, actions, and effects of government.

2. The intentions may or may not be publicly stated.

3. Any formal declarations such as laws, regulations, executive orders, and court decisions are public policy.

Page 5: Dr. Robin Saha Study of the U.S. Institute University of Montana July 8, 2010.

Government Policy Types Corresponding to the U.S. government structure and the three branches of government

Legislative policy – policies enacted by Congress, state legislatures, and city councils

Administrative policy – executive branch policies established by the president, state governors, city mayors and their political appointees, and by federal and state agencies and city offices (bureaucracies)

Judicial policy – policies established by the federal and state courts

Page 6: Dr. Robin Saha Study of the U.S. Institute University of Montana July 8, 2010.

Role of State Government in Environmental PolicyImplement federal environmental laws and programs through

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)

Must have state legislation modeled after federal legislation (must be as or more stringent than federal laws)

In 1980s and 1990s, developed capacity to implement environmental and natural resource laws, accompanied by growth in the state environmental bureaucracy (number and size of agencies)

States have tended to follow federal leadership

Some states (esp. California) are environmental policy innovators – can provide good ideas for federal (national) policy

State can be important testing grounds for new policy approaches

Page 7: Dr. Robin Saha Study of the U.S. Institute University of Montana July 8, 2010.

Environmental Policy“… comprises a diversity of governmental actions that affect or attempt to affect environmental quality or the use of natural resources …. We cannot expect to locate environmental policy in any single decision or statute. Rather it is the aggregate of statutes, regulations, and court precedents, and the attitudes and behavior of public officials charged with making, implementing, and enforcing them. Policies may be tangible or largely symbolic … they may nevertheless bring about important environmental changes over time by influencing public beliefs and organizational values and decision making.” – Michael Kraft (2003).

Page 8: Dr. Robin Saha Study of the U.S. Institute University of Montana July 8, 2010.

Public Policy Theories(also see Vaughn book, Ch. 3)

Elite theory Policy reflects the values, preferences, and

judgments of the governing elites

Elites include powerful government officials, foundations, corporate executives, and influential professionals such as scientists, doctors, lawyers

Focuses on the role of leaders and leadership

Assumes elites influence (manipulate?) “the Masses” rather than the other way around

Movement of non-elites into elite positions is slow and controlled to maintain stability

Page 9: Dr. Robin Saha Study of the U.S. Institute University of Montana July 8, 2010.

Public Policy Theories (continued)Group Theory

Policy is the result of the continuous struggle among interests groups made up of individuals or organizations with common beliefs, values, and goals

Groups differ in the amount and type of resources (political capital), and thus their influence over other groups and policy makers

Government acts as the neutral arbitrator.

Different groups may cancel out or check the power of other groups

Policy makers and the political system manage group conflict by establishing rules of struggle, arranging or imposing compromises, and balancing interests

Policy is the result of the balancing of power between competing groups and represents an equilibrium point

Page 10: Dr. Robin Saha Study of the U.S. Institute University of Montana July 8, 2010.

PowerPower is ability to

reward other actors for doing what one wants or to penalize or punish them for working against ones interests

Page 11: Dr. Robin Saha Study of the U.S. Institute University of Montana July 8, 2010.

What are some sources of power?

Page 12: Dr. Robin Saha Study of the U.S. Institute University of Montana July 8, 2010.

Public Policy Theories (continued)Government Politics Model

A “middle ground” theory that views policies as the result of the influences of elites and organized interest groups

Assumes that policy decisions are the result of the competition, bargaining, and compromise among a diverse set of policy actors

Policy actors have unique interests, resources, and strategies they use to advance their interests

Actors include government decision makers (more on policy actors later)

Political process leads to incremental policy making, i.e., modest new policies and small changes to existing ones,

The political system is most likely to overcome these tendencies in times of major crises

Page 13: Dr. Robin Saha Study of the U.S. Institute University of Montana July 8, 2010.

What are some advantages (good things) about

incremental decision making?

What are some disadvantages?

Page 14: Dr. Robin Saha Study of the U.S. Institute University of Montana July 8, 2010.

Non-governmental policy actorsInterest groups (e.g., NGOs, professional

associations, unions – organized labor), their lobbyists, and members

Corporations, industry trade associations, and their lobbyists

Political Action Committees (PACs)The MediaScientists and scientific bodiesThink tanks (policy and legal research institutes)CelebritiesGeneral public, individual citizens, and public

opinion

Page 15: Dr. Robin Saha Study of the U.S. Institute University of Montana July 8, 2010.

Factors Related to Interest Group InfluenceSize of group membershipAbility to mobilize members into actionMonetary and other resources, including

technical and scientific capabilitiesSkill of its leadershipSocial status and prestige of organization and

leadersSalience of policy issue to mission of the

organizationPresence of absence of competing organizationsAttitudes of public officials (decision makers)

toward group and access to decision makersSite of decision making in the political system

Page 16: Dr. Robin Saha Study of the U.S. Institute University of Montana July 8, 2010.

What are some tactics and strategies used by

non-governmental policy actors to achieve their

environmental policy goals in political battles

Page 17: Dr. Robin Saha Study of the U.S. Institute University of Montana July 8, 2010.

Historical Periods of U.S. Environmental Policy(from Vaughn book, Ch. 1)

Colonial period: 1607 to 1900

Progression reforms and conservationism : 1900 to 1945

Recreation and the age of ecology: post-WWII to 1969

Earth Days and deregulation: 1970 to 1992

Global awareness and gridlock: 1993 to 2000

Rollback: 2000 to 2009

Page 18: Dr. Robin Saha Study of the U.S. Institute University of Montana July 8, 2010.

Major Public Lands and Conservation PoliciesYellowstone National Park Established (1872)Yosemite National Park Established (1890)Forest Reserve Act of 1891Forest Management Act of 1897Antiquities Act of 1906Multiple Use and Sustained Yield Act of 1960 Wilderness Act of 1964National Environmental Policy Act of 1970 (NEPA)Endangered Species Act of 1973 (ESA)National Forest Management Act of 1976 (NFMA)Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976

(FLPMA)Alaska National Interest Land Conservation Act of 1980

(ANILCA)Health Forests Protection Act of 2003 (HFPA)

Page 19: Dr. Robin Saha Study of the U.S. Institute University of Montana July 8, 2010.

Major U.S. Environmental Policies(see separate handout)

Clean Air Act of 1970Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of

1972 (Clean Water Act)Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act

(FIFRA) of 1972Safe Water Drinking Act (SDWA) of 1974Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) of 1976Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of

1976Comprehensive Emergency Response Compensation

and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA)Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of

1986Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990

Page 20: Dr. Robin Saha Study of the U.S. Institute University of Montana July 8, 2010.

Policy Process Stages (Policy Cycle)(also see Vaughn book, Introduction)

Moving from problem to solution:Problem Identification/Definition Agenda SettingPolicy FormulationPolicy Adoption/LegitimationPolicy Implementation (and budgeting)Policy Evaluation Policy Change/EvolutionPolicy Termination or Problem Resolution  

Page 21: Dr. Robin Saha Study of the U.S. Institute University of Montana July 8, 2010.

Public Policy Typology (and associated politics)1. Distributive – grants, programs, and services that distribute resources or

projects (often “pork barrel”) with only “winners” (in the most narrow sense) • College student grants • Agricultural subsidies • Highways and bridges • Parks and other amenities

 

2. Redistributive – having goal of redistributing wealth, income, or opportunity to compensate for market or government failures, with clear “winners” and “losers” • Welfare • Taxes • Social security • Affirmative action

 

3. Regulatory – restricting individual or groups conduct to be within acceptable bounds with general societal benefits and costs to specific industries • Consumer protection • Workplace health and safety • Environmental • Licensing, anti-trust, etc.

Page 22: Dr. Robin Saha Study of the U.S. Institute University of Montana July 8, 2010.

Instruments of Public Policy1. Regulation

• Laws or decrees requiring citizens or corporations to do something or not do something

• Sanctions imposed for non-compliance2. Governmental Management

• Direct provision of services or programs to the public, private industry, or other levels of government

• Includes management of natural resources and environmental quality3. Taxing and Spending

• Mechanism to regulate and provide services• Also used to create incentives to encourage or discourage certain

behaviors and activities, such as smoking4. Market Mechanisms

• Involve decisions to intervene or not into the market place• Can include subsidies and other incentives, or disincentives, to

encourage or discourage certain behaviors and activities5. Education, Information, and Persuasion

• Attempts to persuade people or businesses to behave a certain way 

Page 23: Dr. Robin Saha Study of the U.S. Institute University of Montana July 8, 2010.

Incentive-Based RegulationRather than using penalties for non-compliance, incentive-

based regulation encourages individuals, government entities, and corporations to voluntarily perform desirable behaviors by providing incentives, usually economic (market-based incentives) though sometime rewards and recognition or relief from future regulation are used.

Examples: Cap and trade provisions for SO2 in Clean Air Act of 1990; similar proposed programs for reducing CO2 emissions and hazardous air pollutants such as mercury; tax credits for alternative energy; Candidate Conservation Assurances and Agreement (CCCAs) under the Endangered Species Act; beverage container deposits to encourage recycling; EPA’s Energy Star program to encourage energy conservation.

Page 24: Dr. Robin Saha Study of the U.S. Institute University of Montana July 8, 2010.

QUESTIONS?

Page 25: Dr. Robin Saha Study of the U.S. Institute University of Montana July 8, 2010.

ActivityIn your country groups

Pick an environmental problem or issue

Think of policy instruments (regulation; gov’t mgt., taxing & spending; market mechanisms; education, information, & persuasion) that can address or help solve the problem

For each policy instrument identify the level of government and policy actors that should be involved

Discuss obstacles or challenges to policy adoption

Report back to full group

Page 26: Dr. Robin Saha Study of the U.S. Institute University of Montana July 8, 2010.

Thank You!