Dr Rachel Norman University of Stirling 10 th June 2010.
description
Transcript of Dr Rachel Norman University of Stirling 10 th June 2010.
![Page 1: Dr Rachel Norman University of Stirling 10 th June 2010.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062305/568150c9550346895dbeedd1/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Dr Rachel NormanDr Rachel Norman
University of StirlingUniversity of Stirling
1010thth June 2010. June 2010.
Why Multi scale modelling of biological systems is important.
![Page 2: Dr Rachel Norman University of Stirling 10 th June 2010.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062305/568150c9550346895dbeedd1/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
My background
•Rabies in ethiopian wolves
•Louping ill in red grouse
•Fish parasites
![Page 3: Dr Rachel Norman University of Stirling 10 th June 2010.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062305/568150c9550346895dbeedd1/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Why is changing scale Why is changing scale important?important?
Arises in a large number of systemsArises in a large number of systems
• Physical: From individuals to populations- Physical: From individuals to populations- cells, enzymes, people, animals…cells, enzymes, people, animals…
• Spatial: From local to global- bee hives, Spatial: From local to global- bee hives, villages, farms….villages, farms….
• Temporal: From short term to evolutionary Temporal: From short term to evolutionary time scales – transient dynamics vs time scales – transient dynamics vs equilibrium, present time vs evolutionary equilibrium, present time vs evolutionary time…time…
![Page 4: Dr Rachel Norman University of Stirling 10 th June 2010.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062305/568150c9550346895dbeedd1/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Individuals to populations: Examples
Population growth
Epidemiology
Immunology
![Page 5: Dr Rachel Norman University of Stirling 10 th June 2010.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062305/568150c9550346895dbeedd1/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Population growth
Exponential growth
rXXbabXaXdt
dX )(
Exponential growth
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2
time
X
r=-0.2 r=0 r=0.15 r=0.25
![Page 6: Dr Rachel Norman University of Stirling 10 th June 2010.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062305/568150c9550346895dbeedd1/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Saturated growth
Assume birth decreases or death increases linearly with density
XsXrdt
dX)(
Logistic Growth
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Time
X(t
)
![Page 7: Dr Rachel Norman University of Stirling 10 th June 2010.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062305/568150c9550346895dbeedd1/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Other possibilities
))1(1( KXrX tt
KXrX tt 1exp
trXK exp1
tt
XKXK
2
11
ctt
XKXK
2
1
1
ctt
XKXK
2
1
1
•Name (ref)
•Quadratic [6]
•Ricker [7]
•Skellam [8]
•Beverton Holt [9]
•Hassell [10]
•Maynard-Smith-Slatkin [11]
![Page 8: Dr Rachel Norman University of Stirling 10 th June 2010.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062305/568150c9550346895dbeedd1/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Brannstrom and Sumpter (Proc Roy soc, 272, 2065-2072. 2005)
Built model based on distribution of individuals amongst discrete resource sites.
Changed rules about competition.
Some models, for example the quadratic model cannot be derived this way.
Why not?
![Page 9: Dr Rachel Norman University of Stirling 10 th June 2010.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062305/568150c9550346895dbeedd1/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Questions
Why can’t you get the quadratic model?
What is the best form of a population growth model under different assumptions about the way individuals interact?
![Page 10: Dr Rachel Norman University of Stirling 10 th June 2010.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062305/568150c9550346895dbeedd1/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Epidemiology
![Page 11: Dr Rachel Norman University of Stirling 10 th June 2010.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062305/568150c9550346895dbeedd1/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Example :1 simple SIR model
Susceptible Infected Immune
births
deaths
![Page 12: Dr Rachel Norman University of Stirling 10 th June 2010.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062305/568150c9550346895dbeedd1/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
![Page 13: Dr Rachel Norman University of Stirling 10 th June 2010.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062305/568150c9550346895dbeedd1/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Transmission Term f(S,I)
• Transmission rate per susceptible– contact*prob(infection)*prop infected =
c*p*I/N
• Density dependent transmission– Contact rate = constant * N– Transmission =
• Frequency dependent transmission– Contact rate = constant– Transmission =
SI
N
SI
![Page 14: Dr Rachel Norman University of Stirling 10 th June 2010.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062305/568150c9550346895dbeedd1/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Other forms
Hochberg (JTB, 153, 301-321, 1991)
Fenton, Fairbairn, Norman and Hudson (JAE, 71, 893-905, 2002)
Fitted experimental data on insect parasites to this transmission rate and compared with others in the literature.
baIS
![Page 15: Dr Rachel Norman University of Stirling 10 th June 2010.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062305/568150c9550346895dbeedd1/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Turner, Begon and Bowers (Proc Roy soc, 270, 105-112, 2003)
Cellular Automata
Defined contacts locally for density and frequency dependent transmission.
Look at what happens globally.
They found that they got frequency dependent transmission globally in both cases.
![Page 16: Dr Rachel Norman University of Stirling 10 th June 2010.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062305/568150c9550346895dbeedd1/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Questions:
Does that mean that you cannot get density dependent transmission from an IBM?
What is the “correct” form of the transmission form under different assumptions about interaction?
![Page 17: Dr Rachel Norman University of Stirling 10 th June 2010.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062305/568150c9550346895dbeedd1/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Immunology
Fenton and Perkins (Parasitology, 137, 1027-1038, 2010)
IIPefdt
dI
PIfrPdt
dP
)(
)(
![Page 18: Dr Rachel Norman University of Stirling 10 th June 2010.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062305/568150c9550346895dbeedd1/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
![Page 19: Dr Rachel Norman University of Stirling 10 th June 2010.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062305/568150c9550346895dbeedd1/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Questions
Are these the right assumptions to make about interaction terms?
Can we derive better functions for this?
![Page 20: Dr Rachel Norman University of Stirling 10 th June 2010.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062305/568150c9550346895dbeedd1/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Conclusion
There are many systems where we make population level assumptions about interaction terms.
How do we write down rules about how be observe that individuals behave and derive the population level terms?