Dowdle Draft Spec Opns CMH Presentation V2

download Dowdle Draft Spec Opns CMH Presentation V2

of 38

Transcript of Dowdle Draft Spec Opns CMH Presentation V2

  • 7/28/2019 Dowdle Draft Spec Opns CMH Presentation V2

    1/38

    From Raids to Recon:Special Operations in the Civil War

  • 7/28/2019 Dowdle Draft Spec Opns CMH Presentation V2

    2/38

    Modern Definition of Special Operations

    2

    As defined by ADM William McRaven from his book,

    SPEC OPS: Case Studies in Special Operations Warfare and Practice: 1995

    A Special Operation (SO) is conducted by forces specially trained,

    equipped, and supported for a Specific target whose destruction,

    elimination or rescue (if hostages) is a political or military objective.

  • 7/28/2019 Dowdle Draft Spec Opns CMH Presentation V2

    3/38

    Historical Context

    3

  • 7/28/2019 Dowdle Draft Spec Opns CMH Presentation V2

    4/38

    Types of Modern Special Operations

    Types:

    - Unconventional Warfare (Guerrilla Warfare)*- Raids*

    - Special Reconnaissance*- Psychological Operations (Psyops)

    - Civil Affairs

    - Direct Action

    * Most common Civil War missions

    4

  • 7/28/2019 Dowdle Draft Spec Opns CMH Presentation V2

    5/38

    Modern Definitions

    Unconventional Warfare - ----; in the Civil War, defined as

    Irregular Operations

    Raids -

    Special Reconnaissance -

    5

  • 7/28/2019 Dowdle Draft Spec Opns CMH Presentation V2

    6/38

    Types of Irregular Warfare/Units in the Civil War

    Irregular Warfare-all forms of conflict, from raids to bushwhacking, that did not

    involve the main armies from either side

    Guerrilla- self-constituted armed sets of men in times of war, who form no integrant part ofan organized army, take up arms and lay them down at intervals, and carry on petty war byconducting raids, extortion, massacre, and destruction; who cannot carry many prisoners,and therefore generally give no quarter (Francis Lieber, 1862; issued as GEN ORD 100,Union Army, 1863)

    Brigands and bushwhackers were considered types of guerrilla organizations

    Partisans-small, elite conventional based units given an unconventional mission or role(43rdVA Cavalry BN, Mosbys Rangers)

    NOTE: Partisan organizations communicated withan

    d received orders and direction from theirrespective main armies or legitimate government

    authorities

    As defined in the book, The Uncivil War: Irregular Warfare in the Upper South,

    1861-1865, by Robert R. Macksay, 2000

  • 7/28/2019 Dowdle Draft Spec Opns CMH Presentation V2

    7/38

    Guerrilla Units and Leaders

    Confederate

    IndividualsWilliam Quantrell

    Bill Anderson

    Jesse/Frank James

    Cole/Jim Younger

    George Todd

    Champ Ferguson

    Joseph Porter

    Jack Henson

    Units/Organization

    Quantrells RaidersMissouri Guerrillas

    Arkansas Guerillas

    Deserters

    UnionIndividuals

    SEN James Lane

    John Brown

    Charles Jennison

    Tinker Dave Beaty

    Units/Organizations

    JayHawkers

    Deserters

    Beatys Partisans

    Heroes of America

    Peace Society

  • 7/28/2019 Dowdle Draft Spec Opns CMH Presentation V2

    8/38

    8

    Individuals with Partisan Characteristics

    Confederate

    John Mosby

    John McNeill

    Jesse McNeill

    John Hunt Morgan

    Nathan Bedford Forrest

    John Taylor WoodCharles W. Savez Read

    John Yates Beall

    Harry Gilmor

    Turner Asby

    Elijah Lige White

    Joe ShelbyM. Jeff Swamp Fox Thompson

    James McGee

    Joe Barton

    Adam Stovepipe Johnson

    Union

    William B. Cushing

    James Andrews

    Ben Grierson

    James Wilson

    Charles Carpenter

    (Jessie Scouts)

    Richard Blazer

    Harrison Gray Otis

  • 7/28/2019 Dowdle Draft Spec Opns CMH Presentation V2

    9/38

    9

    Partisan Units

    Confederate

    43rd VA Partisan BN

    1st and 2nd KY Cavalry

    McNeills Rangers

    1st MD Cavalry BN

    Union

    Blazers Union Scouts

    Jessie Scouts

    1

    st

    Arkansas Cavalry1st Missouri Cavalry

  • 7/28/2019 Dowdle Draft Spec Opns CMH Presentation V2

    10/38

    1010

    Partisan Styled Missions in the Civil War

    Confederate

    Mosbys Fairfax Raid Morgans Christmas Raid

    Van Dorns Holly Spring Raid

    Forrests Memphis Raid

    St Albans, VT Raid

    Hamptons Beefsteak Raid

    J.T. Woods NE Coast Raid w/CS Tallahassee CS Hunleys Attack on the Housatonic

    Forrests Floating Cavalry Attack on

    Johnsonville, TN

    C.W. Reads June 1863 NE Coastal Raid

    Mosbys Greenback Raid

    Jesse McNeills Capture of Union Generals

    Crook and Kelley Adam Stovepipe Johnsons capture of

    Newburn, IN

    Jones & Imbodens West VA Raid

    McCauslands PA Raid

    UnionAndrews Raid

    Griersons MISS Raid

    Dahlgren-Kilpatrick Raid

    Wilsons Raid

    Cushings Southport Raid

    Cushings CSAlbermarle Attack Cushings Recon of Cape Fear

    River Averells December 1863 Raid

    Streights April 1863 AL Raid

    Ellets Riverine Capture ofMemphis

  • 7/28/2019 Dowdle Draft Spec Opns CMH Presentation V2

    11/38

    Relative Superiority (RS):

    A condition that exists when an attacking force,generally smaller, gains a decisive advantage over a

    larger or well-defended enemy. It is:

    a. Achieved at the pivotal moment in an engagementb. Once achieved, it must be maintained toaccomplish mission

    c. If lost, RS is difficult to regain

    Key to Spec Ops mission is to gain RS early in the fight

    Central Concept of Modern Special Operations

    11

    As defined by ADM William McRaven from his book,

    SPEC OPS: Case Studies in Special Operations Warfare and Practice: 1995

  • 7/28/2019 Dowdle Draft Spec Opns CMH Presentation V2

    12/38

    Six Characteristics of Relative Superiority

    12

    Simplicity Most crucial characteristic: 3 elements needed to achieve simplicity: Limit

    number of objectives to those considered vital objectives; good intelligence reduces

    unknown factors and number of variables; Innovation eliminates or avoids obstacles that

    compromise or complicate mission execution; NOTE: Simple does not imply easy!

    Security -

    Repetition

    Surprise

    Speed

    Purpose - Two aspects to Purpose: a clearly defined mission statement; and personal

    commitment

    As defined by ADM William McRaven from his book,

    SPEC OPS: Case Studies in Special Operations Warfare and Practice: 1995.

  • 7/28/2019 Dowdle Draft Spec Opns CMH Presentation V2

    13/38

    13

    The Special Operations Model

    SURPRISE SPEED PURPOSE

    SECURITY REPETITION

    SIMPLICITY

    EXECUTION

    MORAL FACTORS

    PLANNING

    PREPARATION

    FRICTIONS OF WAR

    A simple plan, carefully concealed, repeatedly and realistically rehearsed,and executed with surprise, speed and purpose, achieves Relative Superiority.

  • 7/28/2019 Dowdle Draft Spec Opns CMH Presentation V2

    14/38

    14

    Relative Superiority Graph Sample

    1 2 3 4 5 6TIME (HOURS)

    (X-AXIS)

    PROBABILITY

    OF

    MISSION

    COMPLETION

    (Y-AXIS)

    MISSION COMPLETION

    RELATIVE SUPERIORITY

    ACHIEVED

    POINT

    OF

    VULNERABILITY

    (PV)

    KEY MISSIONEVENTS

    RELATIVE SUPERIORITY

    LINE (RS LINE)

    AREA

    OF

    VULNERABILITY

  • 7/28/2019 Dowdle Draft Spec Opns CMH Presentation V2

    15/38

    15

    Personal Characteristics

    Independent

    Self-Motivated

    Non-conformist

    Disciplined

    Takes Calculated Risks, but does not Gamble

    Adaptive, Flexible

    Perfectionist

  • 7/28/2019 Dowdle Draft Spec Opns CMH Presentation V2

    16/38

    Criteria for Case Studies

  • 7/28/2019 Dowdle Draft Spec Opns CMH Presentation V2

    17/38

    17

    Case Study 1: Mosbys Fairfax Raid

    Who: John Mosbys 43rd VA Partisan Rangers

    What: Harassing Federal forces in northern VA

    When: March 8-9, 1863

    Where: Fairfax, Virginia

    Why: To snatch (kidnap) COL Sir Percy Wynham, Union Army

  • 7/28/2019 Dowdle Draft Spec Opns CMH Presentation V2

    18/38

    18

    Background for Fairfax Raid

  • 7/28/2019 Dowdle Draft Spec Opns CMH Presentation V2

    19/38

    19

    Objective of Fairfax Raid

    Edwin B. StoughtonCOL Percy Wynham

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Edwin_H._Stoughton.jpghttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Edwin_H._Stoughton.jpg
  • 7/28/2019 Dowdle Draft Spec Opns CMH Presentation V2

    20/38

    20

    43rd VA Partisan Ranger BN

  • 7/28/2019 Dowdle Draft Spec Opns CMH Presentation V2

    21/38

    21

    John Mosby: The Gray Ghost

  • 7/28/2019 Dowdle Draft Spec Opns CMH Presentation V2

    22/38

    22

    Actions Before the Raid

  • 7/28/2019 Dowdle Draft Spec Opns CMH Presentation V2

    23/38

    23

    Mission Timeline & Events

  • 7/28/2019 Dowdle Draft Spec Opns CMH Presentation V2

    24/38

    24

    Mission Timeline & EventsMission Timeline & Events (cont)

  • 7/28/2019 Dowdle Draft Spec Opns CMH Presentation V2

    25/38

    25

    Analysis of Fairfax Raid

  • 7/28/2019 Dowdle Draft Spec Opns CMH Presentation V2

    26/38

    26

    Impact of Fairfax Raid

    President Lincoln, on hearing of the capture, said "he did not so much mindthe loss of a brigadier general, for he could make another in five minutes; 'but

    those horses cost $125 apiece!

  • 7/28/2019 Dowdle Draft Spec Opns CMH Presentation V2

    27/38

    27

    Case Study 2: Cushings Attack on the CSAlbermarle

    Who: LT William B. Cushing

    What:

    When: October 27-28, 1864

    Where: Plymouth, NC

    Why: To neutralize the ironclad CS Albemarle supporting

    Confederate forces at Plymouth, NC

    Impossibilities Are For the Timid

    http://dmn.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/61.jpg
  • 7/28/2019 Dowdle Draft Spec Opns CMH Presentation V2

    28/38

    28

    Background of Cushings Attack

    http://ironbrigader.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/NC-coastal-map.png
  • 7/28/2019 Dowdle Draft Spec Opns CMH Presentation V2

    29/38

    29

    Objective of Cushings Attack

  • 7/28/2019 Dowdle Draft Spec Opns CMH Presentation V2

    30/38

    30

    Cushings Crew and Torpedo Boat

  • 7/28/2019 Dowdle Draft Spec Opns CMH Presentation V2

    31/38

    31

    William B. Cushing: Lincolns Commando

  • 7/28/2019 Dowdle Draft Spec Opns CMH Presentation V2

    32/38

    32

    Actions Before the Attack

  • 7/28/2019 Dowdle Draft Spec Opns CMH Presentation V2

    33/38

    33

    Mission Timeline & Events

    http://dmn.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/34.jpg
  • 7/28/2019 Dowdle Draft Spec Opns CMH Presentation V2

    34/38

    34

    Mission Timeline & Events (cont)

    http://bendermaritime.com/artwork/originals/pages/DavidGoliath_lg.html
  • 7/28/2019 Dowdle Draft Spec Opns CMH Presentation V2

    35/38

    35

    Analysis of Cushings Attack

    6 Characteristics

  • 7/28/2019 Dowdle Draft Spec Opns CMH Presentation V2

    36/38

    36

    Impact of Cushings Attack

  • 7/28/2019 Dowdle Draft Spec Opns CMH Presentation V2

    37/38

    37

    Conclusion

    Q i ?

  • 7/28/2019 Dowdle Draft Spec Opns CMH Presentation V2

    38/38

    38

    Questions?

    http://norbay.com/product/naval-special-warfare-special-boat-team-12-decalhttp://norbay.com/product/special-forces-detachment-delta-decal-0http://norbay.com/product/special-operations-command-patch-1http://norbay.com/product/army-ranger-75th-rgt-tabshttp://norbay.com/product/usaf-pararescue-decalhttp://norbay.com/product/marines-special-operations-command-marsoc-decalhttp://norbay.com/product/naval-special-warfare-command-decalhttp://norbay.com/product/air-force-special-ops-command-decal