WELCOME 1 DOUBLE DIGIT GROWTH ACTION PLAN KOLLIPARA MANDAL GUNTUR DISTRICT 2.
Double Digit Growth Agriculture Department Mandal : Thondur Year : 2015 - 16.
-
Upload
angelica-perry -
Category
Documents
-
view
216 -
download
2
Transcript of Double Digit Growth Agriculture Department Mandal : Thondur Year : 2015 - 16.
Double Digit Growth Agriculture Department
Mandal : ThondurYear : 2015 - 16
Thondur Mandal Map
Thondur : Mandal profile
S.No Particulars Unit Area
1 Total Geographic Area Ha 25686
2 Forest Area Ha 1931
3 Barren & Uncultivable area Ha 3863
4 Cultivable waste Ha 1515
5 Permanent Pastures& Other grazing lands Ha 0
6 Area under orchards Ha 750
7 Fallow Lands Ha 1718
8 No.of.Villages/Gram Panchayats No 15
9 No.of. Revenue Villages No 17
10 Agriculture families
a)Small Farmers No /ha 3370
b)Marginal Farmers No / ha 1959
c)Others No/ ha 3257
Agriculture
Growth Engines• Groundnut• Bengalgram• Cotton• Sesamum• Jowar
3. Normal Areas,Production &Productivity of crops ( for last 2 yrs) 2013-14& 2014-15.
Mandal: Thondur
S.No Crop
2013 -14 2014 -15
Area in Ha
Productivity in
Kgs./Ha
Production in MTs.
GVA in Crs.
Area in Ha
Productivity in
Kgs./Ha
Production in MTs.
GVA in Crs.
1 Groundnut 2254 1175 2648 11.9 1185 925 1096 4.93
2 Cotton 3805 350 1332 5.66 2675 766 2049 8.71
3 Bengalgram 3920963
3775 14.4 1204 562 677 2.57
4 Maize 20 7048 141 0.2 0 0 0 0
5 Sunflower 2712 965 2617 10.5 1266 545 690 2.76
6 Jowar 616 1250 1170 1.23 260 780 203 0.32
7 Sesamum 0 0 0 0 258 365 94 0.15
8 Other Crops 239 145 0.56 230 160 0.62
4. Area, Production& Productivity of targets of Growth Engines for 2015-16 .
Mandal: Thondur
S.No Crop
2014 -15 2015 - 16 Net Increases
Area in Ha
Productivity in
Kgs./Ha
Production
in MTs.
GVA in
Crs.Area in Ha
Productivity in
Kgs./Ha
Production
in MTs.
GVA in
Crs.Area in Ha
Productivity in
Kgs./Ha
Production
in MTs.
GVA in
Crs.
1Groundnut 1185 925 1096 4.93 2254 1156 2606 11.73 1069 231 1510 6.8
2 Cotton 2675 766 2049 8.71 2950 770 2272 9.66 275 4 223 0.95
3Bengalgram 1204 562 677 2.57 2550 880 2244 8.53 1346 318 1567 5.96
4 Sunflower 1266 545 690 2.76 1498 850 1273 5.09 232 305 583 2.33
5 Jowar 260 780 203 0.32 309 1768 547 0.88 49 988 344 0.56
3 Sesamum 258 365 94 0.15 258 380 98 0.53 0 15 4 0.38
7Other Crops 230 160 0.62 239 145 0.56 9 0 -15 -0.06
Interventions proposed to achieve Double Digit Growth
Interventions
1.Seed replacement
2. Integrated Nutrient Management (INM)
a. Macro Nutrient application
b.Micro Nutrient application (Zinc Sulphate)
3. Integrated pest management (IPM)
4. Farm Mechanization
5. Area proposed of previous year brought under cultivation
Present and Projected scenario
Year Area(Ha) Production
( MT)Productvity(Kg
s per Ha)GVA (Rs. In
crores)
2014-15 1204 677 562 2.57
2015-16 2550 2244 880 8.53
Net Increase 1346 1567 318 5.96
Mandal :
Thondur
Crop :
Bengalgram
1Seed Replacement
a Area Proposed under Seed Replacement Ha 1204
b Cost reduction per Ha due to supply of Subsidy seed Rs. /ha 500
c Total cost reduction due to supply of subsidy seed Rs. In Crs 0.0602
d Yield increase per Ha Qtls. 0.8
e Total Yield Increase Qtls. 963.2
f Benefit due to Yield increase Rs. In Crs 0.33712
g Net benefit due to Seed Replacement Rs. In Crs 0.39732
h Net benefit to the farmer due to seed replacement per Ha Rs. /ha 3300
2Integrated Nutrient Management
AMacro Nutrient application
a Area Proposed under INM Ha 1204
b NPK as per recommended dose Rs. /ha 2444
c Cost of fertilizer as per farmers usage Rs. /ha 3737
dCost reduce per Ha due adopting of INM Macro Nutient application Rs. /ha 1293
e Total benefit on Macro Nutrient application Rs. In Crs 0.155677
f Yield increase per Ha Qtls. 0.6
g Total Yield Increase Qtls. 722.4
h Benefit due to Yield increase Rs. In Crs 0.25284
I Net benefit due to Macro Nutrient application Rs. In Crs 0.408517
jNet benefit to the farmer due to Macro Nutrient application per Ha Rs. /ha 3393
BMicro Nutrient application (Zinc Sulphate)
a Area Proposed under Zinc Sulphate Application Ha 200
bCost reduction per Ha due to supply of Zinc Suplhate under Subsidy Pattern Rs. /ha 790
cTotal cost reduction due to supply of Zinc Sulphate under Subsidy Pattern Rs. In Crs 0.0158
d Yield increase per Ha Qtls. 0.5
e Total Yield Increase Qtls. 100
f Benefit due to Yield increase Rs. In Crs 0.035
g Net benefit due to Zinc Sulphate application Rs. In Crs 0.0508
hNet benefit to the farmer due to Zinc Sulphate application per Ha Rs. /ha 2540
3Integrated Pest Management
Adpoting of IPM
a Area Proposed under IPM Application Ha 1204
b IPM as per recommended dose Rs. /ha 3523
c Farmer Practice usage Rs. /ha 7100
d Cost reduction Ha due to adopting of IPM Rs. /ha 3577
e Total benefit on IPM application Rs. In Crs 0.430671
f Yield increase per Ha Qtls. 0.6
g Total Yield Increase Qtls. 722.4
h Benefit due to Yield increase Rs. In Crs 0.25284
i Net benefit due to IPM application Rs. In Crs 0.683511
j Net benefit to the farmer due to IPM application per Ha Rs. /ha 5677
4FYM application
a Area Proposed under FYM Application Ha 1204
b Cost increaseper Ha due to FYM application Rs. /ha 2500
c Total benefit on FYM application Rs. In Crs 0.301
d Yield increase per Ha Qtls. 1
e Total Yield Increase Qtls. 1204
f Benefit due to Yield increase Rs. In Crs 0.4214
g Net benefit due to FYM application Rs. In Crs 0.1204
h Net benefit to the farmer due to FYM application per Ha Rs. /ha 1000
4Farm Mechanisation
a Area Proposed under Farm Mechanisation Application Ha 2380
bCost reduction per Ha due to Rotavator& Ferti cum Seed drill & Tractor mounted sprayer and MCT. Rs. /ha 2500
c Cost reduction due to FM implementaion on Labour Rs. In Crs 0.595
d Yield increase per Ha Qtls. 0.4
e Total Yield Increase Qtls. 952
f Benefit due to Yield increase Rs. In Crs 0.3332
g Net benefit due to FM Rs. In Crs 0.9282
h Net benefit to the farmer due to FM per Ha Rs. /ha 3900
5Increase of Area
a Area proopsed to be increase Ha 1095
b Yield increase per Ha Qtls. 8.8
c Total Yield Increase Qtls. 9636
d Benefit due to Yield increase Rs. In Crs 3.3726
e Net benefit due to additional area Rs. In Crs 3.3726
SUMMARY 0
a Total area proposed Ha 2299
b Cost reduction /ha due to interventions Rs. /ha 5370
c Net bebifit to the farmers due to interventions Rs. /ha 19810
d Total value increase Rs. In Crs 5.96
Interventions proposed to achieve Double Digit Growth
Present and Projected scenario
Year Area(Ha) Production
( MT)Productvity (Kgs.per Ha)
GVA (Rs. In crores)
2014-15 2675 2049 766 8.71
2015-16 2950 2272 770 9.66
Net Increase 275 223 4 0.95
Interventions
1.Integrated Nutrient Management (INM)
a. Macro Nutrient application
b.Micro Nutrient application (Boron)
2. Integrated pest management (IPM)
Mandal : Thondur Crop : Cotton
1Integrated Nutrient Management
AMacro Nutrient application
a Area Proposed under INM Ha 1550.00
b NPK as per recommended dose Rs. /ha 4261.00
c Cost of fertilizer as per farmers usage Rs. /ha 5480.00
d Cost reduce per Ha due adopting of INM Macro Nutient application Rs. /ha 1219.00
e Total benefit on Macro Nutrient application Rs. In Crs 0.19
f Yield increase per Ha Qtls. 0.30
g Total Yield Increase Qtls. 465.00
h Benefit due to Yield increase Rs. In Crs 0.19
i Net benefit due to Macro Nutrient application Rs. In Crs 0.38
j Net benefit to the farmer due to Macro Nutrient application per Ha Rs. /ha 2434.00
BMicro Nutrient application (Boron)
a Area Proposed under Boron Application Ha 1000.00
b Cost reduction per Ha due to supply of Boron under Subsidy Pattern Rs. /ha 135.00
c Total cost reduction due to supply of Boron under Subsidy Pattern Rs. In Crs 0.01
d Yield increase per Ha Qtls. 0.20
e Total Yield Increase Qtls. 200.00
f Benefit due to Yield increase Rs. In Crs 0.08
g Net benefit due to Boron application Rs. In Crs 0.09
h Net benefit to the farmer due to Boron application per Ha Rs. /ha 945.00
2Integrated Pest Management
Adpoting of IPM
a Area Proposed under IPM ApplicationHa
1020.00
b IPM as per recommended dose Rs. /ha
2000.00
c Farmer Practice usageRs. /ha
3000.00
d Cost reduction Ha due to adopting of IPMRs. /ha
1000.00
e Total benefit on IPM applicationRs. In Crs
0.40
f Yield increase per HaQtls.
0.20
g Total Yield IncreaseQtls.
204.00
h Benefit due to Yield increaseRs. In Crs
0.08
i Net benefit due to IPM application Rs. In Crs
0.48
j Net benefit to the farmer due to IPM application per HaRs. /ha
4731.57
SUMMARY
0.00
a Total area proposedha
2950.00
b Cost reduction /ha due to interventionsRs. /ha
2354.00
c Net bebifit to the farmers due to interventionsRs. /ha
8110.57
d Total value increase Rs. In Crs
0.95
Interventions
1. Seed replacement
2. Integrated Nutrient Management (INM)
a) Macro Nutrient Management
b) Micro Nutrient application (Gypsum)
3. Farm Yard Manure
4. Integrated Pest Management (IPM)
5. Area of previous year brought under cultivation
Interventions proposed to achieve Double Digit Growth
Present and Projected scenario
Year Area(Ha) Production (MT)Productvity (Kgs.
per Ha)GVA (Rs. In crores)
2014-15 1185 1096 925 4.932015-16 2254 2606 1156 11.73
Net Increase 1069 1510 231 6.80
Mandal : Thondur Crop : Groundnut
1Seed Replacement
a Area Proposed under Seed Replacement Ha 1185.00
b Cost reduction per Ha due to supply of Subsidy seed Rs. /ha 2700.00
c Total cost reduction due to supply of subsidy seed Rs. In Crs 0.32
d Yield increase per Ha Qtls. 0.72
e Total Yield Increase Qtls. 853.20
f Benefit due to Yield increase Rs. In Crs 0.51
g Net benefit due to Seed Replacement Rs. In Crs 0.83
h Net benefit to the farmer due to seed replacement per Ha Rs. /ha 7020.00
2Integrated Nutrient Management 0.00
AMacro Nutrient application 0.00
a Area Proposed under INM Ha 1185.00
b NPK as per recommended dose Rs. /ha 2922.00
c Cost of fertilizer as per farmers usage Rs. /ha 4825.00
d Cost reduce per Ha due adopting of INM Macro Nutient application Rs. /ha 1903.00
e Total benefit on Macro Nutrient application Rs. In Crs 0.23
f Yield increase per Ha Qtls. 0.50
g Total Yield Increase Qtls. 592.50
h Benefit due to Yield increase Rs. In Crs 0.36
i Net benefit due to Macro Nutrient application Rs. In Crs 0.58
j Net benefit to the farmer due to Macro Nutrient application per Ha Rs. /ha 4903.00
BMicro Nutrient application (GYPSUM)
a Area Proposed under Gypsum Application Ha 1185.00
bCost increse per Ha due to supply of Gypsum under Subsidy Pattern Rs. /ha 1800.00
cTotal cost reduction due to supply of Gypsum under Subsidy Pattern Rs. In Crs 0.21
d Yield increase per Ha Qtls. 0.50
e Total Yield Increase Qtls. 592.50
f Benefit due to Yield increase Rs. In Crs 0.36
g Net benefit due to Gypsum application Rs. In Crs 0.57
h Net benefit to the farmer due to Gypsum application per Ha Rs. /ha 4800.00
3FYM application 0.00
a Area Proposed under FYM Application Ha 1185.00
b Cost increaseper Ha due to FYM application Rs. /ha 2500.00
c Total benefit on FYM application Rs. In Crs 0.30
d Yield increase per Ha Qtls. 0.50
e Total Yield Increase Qtls. 592.50
f Benefit due to Yield increase Rs. In Crs 0.36
g Net benefit due to FYM application Rs. In Crs 0.06
h Net benefit to the farmer due to FYM application per Ha Rs. /ha 500.00
4Integrated Pest Management Adpoting of IPM
a Area Proposed under IPM Application Ha 1185.00
b IPM as per recommended dose Rs. /ha 1602.00
c Farmer Practice usage Rs. /ha 2537.00
d Cost reduction Ha due to adopting of IPM Rs. /ha 935.00
e Total benefit on IPM application Rs. In Crs 0.11
f Yield increase per Ha Qtls. 0.50
g Total Yield Increase Qtls. 592.50
h Benefit due to Yield increase Rs. In Crs 0.36
i Net benefit due to IPM application Rs. In Crs 0.47
j Net benefit to the farmer due to IPM application per Ha Rs. /ha 3935.00
5Increase of Area 0.00
a Area proopsed to be increase Ha 1069.00
b Yield increase per Ha Qtls. 6.70
c Total Yield Increase Qtls. 7162.30
d Benefit due to Yield increase Rs. In Crs 4.30
e Net benefit due to additional area Rs. In Crs 4.30
SUMMARY 0.00
a Total area proposed Ha 2254.00
b Cost reduction /ha due to interventions Rs. /ha 2840
c Net bebifit to the farmers Rs. /ha 21158
d Total value increase Rs. In Crs 6.80
Interventions proposed to achieve Double Digit Growth
Present and Projected scenario
Year Area(Ha) Production
(MT)Productvity (Kgs.per Ha)
GVA (Rs. In crores)
2014-15 260 203 780 0.32
2015-16 309 547 1768 0.88
Net Increase 49 344 988 0.56
Interventions
1.Integrated Nutrient Management (INM)
a. Macro Nutrient application
b.Micro Nutrient application (Zinc Sulphate)
2. Integrated pest management (IPM)
Mandal: Thondur Crop : Jowar
1Integrated Nutrient Management
AMacro Nutrient application
a Area Proposed under INM Ha 309.00
b NPK as per recommended dose Rs. /ha 1749.00
c Cost of fertilizer as per farmers usage Rs. /ha 2705.00
d Cost reduce per Ha due adopting of INM Macro Nutient application Rs. /ha 956.00
e Total benefit on Macro Nutrient application Rs. In Crs 0.03
f Yield increase per Ha Qtls. 3.50
g Total Yield Increase Qtls. 1081.50
h Benefit due to Yield increase Rs. In Crs 0.18
i Net benefit due to Macro Nutrient application Rs. In Crs 0.21
j Net benefit to the farmer due to Macro Nutrient application per Ha Rs. /ha 6906.002Integrated Pest Management 0.00
Adpoting of IPM 91.00
a Area Proposed under IPM Application Ha 395.00
b IPM as per recommended dose Rs. /ha 0.00
c Farmer Practice usage Rs. /ha 1.50
d Cost reduction Ha due to adopting of IPM Rs. /ha 136.50
e Total benefit on IPM application Rs. In Crs 0.02
f Yield increase per Ha Qtls. 0.03
g Total Yield Increase Qtls. 2945.00
h Benefit due to Yield increase Rs. In Crs 309.00
i Net benefit due to IPM application Rs. In Crs 1749.00
j Net benefit to the farmer due to IPM application per Ha Rs. /ha 2705.00
2Integrated Pest Management Adpoting of IPM
a Area Proposed under IPM Application Ha 309.00
b IPM as per recommended dose Rs. /ha 920.00
c Farmer Practice usage Rs. /ha 1380.00
d Cost reduction Ha due to adopting of IPM Rs. /ha 460.00
e Total benefit on IPM application Rs. In Crs 0.01
f Yield increase per Ha Qtls. 3.00
g Total Yield Increase Qtls. 927.00
h Benefit due to Yield increase Rs. In Crs 0.16
i Net benefit due to IPM application Rs. In Crs 0.17
j Net benefit to the farmer due to IPM application per Ha Rs. /ha 5560.00
3Increase of Area
a Area proopsed to be increase Ha 49.00
b Yield increase per Ha Qtls. 18.00
c Total Yield Increase Qtls. 882.00
d Benefit due to Yield increase Rs. In Crs 0.15
e Net benefit due to additional area Rs. In Crs 0.15 SUMMARY
a Total area proposed Ha 309.00
b Cost reduction /ha due to interventions Rs. /ha 1811.00
c Net bebifit to the farmers due to interventions Rs. /ha 12466.00
d Total value increase Rs. In Crs 0.56
Interventions proposed to achieve Double Digit Growth
Present and Projected scenario
Year Area(Ha) Production
(MT)Productvity
(Kgs. per Ha)GVA (Rs. In
crores)
2014-15 1266 690 545 2.76
2015-16 1498 1273 850 5.09
Net Increase 232 583 305 2.33
Mandal: Thondur Crop : Sunflower
Interventions
1. Integrated Nutrient Management (INM)
a. Macro Nutrient application
b.Micro Nutrient application (Zinc Sulphate)
2. Integrated pest management (IPM)
3. Farm Mechanization
4. Area of previous year brought under cultivation
1Integrated Nutrient Management AMacro Nutrient application
a Area Proposed under INMHa
1266.00
b NPK as per recommended dose Ha
2271.00
c Cost of fertilizer as per farmers usage
3535.00
d Cost reduce per Ha due adopting of INM Macro Nutient applicationRs. /ha
1264.00
e Total benefit on Macro Nutrient applicationRs. In Crs
0.16
f Yield increase per HaQtls.
1.50
g Total Yield IncreaseQtls.
1899.00
h Benefit due to Yield increaseRs. In Crs
0.76
i Net benefit due to Macro Nutrient application Rs. In Crs
0.92
j Net benefit to the farmer due to Macro Nutrient application per HaRs. /ha
7264.00
BMicro Nutrient application (Boron)
0.00
a Area Proposed under Boron ApplicationHa
344.00
bCost reduction per Ha due to supply of Boron under Subsidy Pattern
Rs. /ha135.00
c Total cost reduction due to supply of Boron under Subsidy PatternRs. In Crs
0.00
d Yield increase per HaQtls.
0.50
e Total Yield IncreaseQtls.
172.00
f Benefit due to Yield increaseRs. In Crs
0.07
g Net benefit due to Boron application Rs. In Crs
0.07
h Net benefit to the farmer due to Boron application per HaRs. /ha
2135.00
2Integrated Pest Management
Adpoting of IPM
a Area Proposed under IPM Application Ha 1195.00
b IPM as per recommended dose Ha 2050.00
c Farmer Practice usage 3500.00
d Cost reduction Ha due to adopting of IPM Rs. /ha 1450.00
e Total benefit on IPM application Rs. In Crs 0.17
f Yield increase per Ha Qtls. 1.00
g Total Yield Increase Qtls. 1195.00
h Benefit due to Yield increase Rs. In Crs 0.48
i Net benefit due to IPM application Rs. In Crs 0.65
j Net benefit to the farmer due to IPM application per Ha Rs. /ha 5450.00
3Increase of Area
a Area proopsed to be increase Ha 232.00
b Yield increase per Ha Qtls. 7.00
c Total Yield Increase Qtls. 1624.00
d Benefit due to Yield increase Rs. In Crs 0.68
e Net benefit due to additional area Rs. In Crs 0.68 SUMMARY a Total area proposed Ha 1498.00b Cost reduction /ha due to interventions Rs. /ha 2849.00c Net bebifit to the farmers due to interventions Rs. /ha 14849.00d Total value increase Rs. In Crs 2.33
Interventions proposed to achieve Double Digit Growth
Present and Projected scenario
Year Area(Ha) Production
( MT)Productvity (Kgs.per Ha)
GVA (Rs. In crores)
2014-15 49 20 412 0.11
2015-16 49 22 450 0.12
Net Increase 0 2 38 0.01
Interventions
1.Integrated Nutrient Management (INM)
a. Macro Nutrient application
b.Micro Nutrient application (Boron)
2. Integrated pest management (IPM)
Mandal : Thondur Crop : Sesamum
1Integrated Nutrient Management A Macro Nutrient application a Area Proposed under INM Ha 258.00b NPK as per recommended dose Rs. /ha 2177.00c Cost of fertilizer as per farmers usage Rs. /ha 2868.00d Cost reduce per Ha due adopting of INM Macro Nutient application Rs. /ha 1117.00e Total benefit on Macro Nutrient application Rs. In Crs 0.03f Yield increase per Ha Qtls. 1.50g Total Yield Increase Qtls. 387.00h Benefit due to Yield increase Rs. In Crs 0.19 i Net benefit due to Macro Nutrient application Rs. In Crs 0.21
j Net benefit to the farmer due to Macro Nutrient application per Ha Rs. /ha 8317.002Integrated Pest Management 0.00
Adpoting of IPM 0.00a Area Proposed under IPM Application Ha 258.00b IPM as per recommended dose Rs. /ha 1402.00c Farmer Practice usage Rs. /ha 1970.00d Cost reduction Ha due to adopting of IPM Rs. /ha 568.00e Total benefit on IPM application Rs. In Crs 0.01f Yield increase per Ha Qtls. 1.20g Total Yield Increase Qtls. 309.60h Benefit due to Yield increase Rs. In Crs 0.15 i Net benefit due to IPM application Rs. In Crs 0.16j Net benefit to the farmer due to IPM application per Ha Rs. /ha 6328.00 SUMMARY 0.00a Total area proposed Ha 258.00b Cost reduction /ha due to interventions Rs. /ha 1685.00c Net bebifit to the farmers due to interventions Rs. /ha 0.38d Total value increase Rs. In Crs 0.38
Soil Condition
S.No Problem Remedy to address the problem
1 Low Organic carbon content in the soil Raising of legume crops(PULSES) for nitrogen fixation in soil and application of soil amendments like castor cake ,Neem seed kernal extract etc
2 Low nitrogen content in soil Split application of nitrogenous fertilisers as basal and top dressing and Prevention of nitrogen losses by using neem coated urea
3Increase in phosphates (P2O5) content in soil
Recommendation of increased use of organic fertiliser and application of phosphorus solubilising bio fertilisers in soil
4 Increase in PH OF SOIL i.e>8.7 Application of Gypsum at an average of 500 kg /acre
5 Decerese in PH i.e <4.00 Application of lime at an average of 600 to 1200 Kg/acre
6Micronutrient deficiency for zinc and iron elements
Application of the respective Micronutrient fertiliser
7 Increase in Electrical conductivity Managing drainage problem in irrigation and leaching of excess salts in soil
5.Soil Health Profile based on soil test results conducted during 2015.
Sl. No.
Component Target
No.of soil
samples collecte
d by MAOs
No.of Soil
Sample received to Lab
No.of Soil
Sample analyse
d
Soil Health Cards online
Soil Health Cards
distributed
1 Macro 440 440 440 440
226 2262 Micro 220 220 220 220
S.No Particulars Status S.No Particulars Status
1Ogranic Carbon Low 1Zinc 90% deficient
2Nitrogen Low 2Boran 40 % deficient
3Phosphorous Medium 3Iron 71% deficient
4Potash High 4Sulphar 31 % deficient
• Potassium Content in Soils is Very high, hence Farmers recommended not to apply Potassium to Soils apply of Phosphate as Basal dose only in follow of recommendations• Apply of Neem coated Urea for increase efficiency of Nitrogen• As per the analysis reports received Micronutrient deficiencies observed as detailed Zinc- 90% deficiency, Iron- 71% deficiency, Sulphure- 31% deficiency, Boron- 40% deficiency. •To correct Micronutrient deficiencies, the following Micronutrients proposed to Supply by Department of Agriculture as follows• Zinc targeted area proposed is 291 ha, allotted 5.0mts• Boron targeted area proposed is 1344 ha, allotted 0.92mts• Gypsum targeted area proposed is 1969 ha, allotted 264 MTs
6. Key Performance Indicators (KPIs)
I Additional Areas:-
• Additional Areas under irrigation provided by Irrigation department.:- nil
• Areas crop wise targeted by Department of Agriculture:-
• Areas crop wise brought under diversification and previous area brought
under cultivation detailed below.
Crop Bengal gram
Ground nut
Cotton Sunflower Total
Area in ha 1346 1069 275 232 2922
Crop Bengal gram Remarks
Name of Variety NBG-3 Seed availability is the major constrain
No. of ha’s proposed 1000
Qty of Seed required in qtls
1429.00
B) Varietal Replacement plan targeted for 2015-16:-
6. Key Performance Indicators (KPIs)
Sno Year
Mandal Normal area Urea DAP NPK Other Total
1 2013-14 19058 290 358 860 132 1640
2 2014-15 15510 162 101 552 95 910
III Soil Health Management
A. Fertilizer requirement as per Normal Areas for last 2 years.
Sno Year
Mandal Normal area Urea DAP NPK Other Total Remarks
1 2013-14 19058 290 358 860 132 1640
Fertilizer Consumption assumed based on the Fertilizer sales at Mandal level
B.Actual chemical fertilizer consumed for last 2 years.
Sno Year
Mandal Normal area Urea DAP MOP NPK SSP Total
1 2015-16 16854 850 750 350 1100 110 3160
C.As per the targeted area, fertilizer requirement for 2015-16 (as per the soil test based recommendations).
Sl.
NoName of the
DivisionName of the
Mandal
Gypsum 42% deficiencyKharif-15 Rabi-15-16
Area in Ha Target Positione
dDistribut
edArea in
Ha Target Positioned
Distributed
1 Muddanur Thondur 1644 114 21 2 325 150
Sl. No
Name of the
Division
Name of the Manda
l
Boron Boron 40% Deficiency
Total TargetKharif-15 Rabi-15-16
Basal Basal Foliar
Area
Target
Positioned
Distributed
AreaTarget
Positioned
Distributed
Area
Target
Positioned
Distributed
Area
Target
Positioned
Distributed
1 MuddanurThondur
1344 0.920 0.25 0 1008 0.75 0.25 0 34 0.010 269 0.15
Sl. No
Name of the
Division
Name of the Manda
l
Zinc Sulphate 65% deficiancyTotal Kharif-15 Rabi-15-16
Area
Target
Positioned
Distributed
Basal Foliar 12% Basal
AreaTarget
Positioned
Distributed
Area
Target
Positioned
Distributed
Area
Target
Positioned
Distributed
1 Muddanur Thondur 291 5 0 0 233 4 0 0 7 0.13 7 0.13
Allocation of Micro Nutrients for the year 2015-16
D.Saving of fertilizer by following soil test based recommendations.
. Potassium Content in Soils is Very high, hence Farmers recommended not to apply
Potassium to Soils.
. Apply of Phosphate as Basal dose only in follow of Recommendations.
. Apply of Neem coated Urea for increase of efficiency
E.Micro nutrient deficiency in Normal areas and targets F. Problematic soils like Saline,
Alkaline, salt etc. and areas and measures taken for reclamation (quantify Nil).
•Detailed good agronomical practices to be adopted crop wise.
•Groundnut:- Seed Treatment with T.viridae-8-10g/kg of Seed
. Basal application of Zinc 50kgs /ha
. Gypsum application at peg penetrtion stage@500Kg/Ha. .
Mechanized Harvesting
•Cotton:- Seed treatment with Imidacloprid -48%- 7gms/kg
.Basal application of Zinc-50kg/ha, Boron-2.5kg/ha, Magnesium-
10kg/ha
Application of Fertilizer within 90DAS
.Stem application method within 60DAS
. Inter cropping with Redgram crop
. To reduce pesticide consumption sowing of Non-Bt cotton.
IV Good Agricultural Practices
3.Bengal gram:- .Seed treatment with T.viridae-8-10g/kg of Seed./
Hexaconazole-2ml/kg of seed
. Inter cropping with Coriander @8:2 ratio
• Highlight locally adopted best agronomical practices and
indigenously developed practices.:- Nil
•Crop sequence:- 1. Groundnut- coriander, 2.Cotton-Pulses(Green gram
or Black gram)
•Crop rotation:- 1. . Cotton-Bengal gram
2. Bengal gram- Coriander
•Double cropping 1. Groundnut- Pulses
Inter cropping:- 1.Cotton-Redgram
IV Good Agricultural Practices
A)Crop Sequence:Groundnut crop sequence with Green gram or sesamum
results in increased yields.
B) Crop rotation:with legumes in cereals increases nitrogen fixation and results
in increased yields.
C)Intercropping:Intercropping with castor or cow pea in ground nut reduces
incidence of Spodoptera and leaf eating caterpillars.Intercropping with Red gram
in ground nut provides additional income.Border cropping with Jowar or bajra in
ground nut reduces incidence of Bud necrosis by arresting thrips movement.
D)Double cropping:Ground nut with Sesamum or sorghum will not only reduces
preparation cost for other crop and also reduces pest incidence leads to
increased returns.
IV Good Agricultural Practices
Strategies and techniques followed to reduce cost of cultivation.
•Chemical fertilizer applications (Nitrogen ):- By application of Green
manure seed, improves the Fertilizer efficiency, there by reduces the
Application of Nitrogenous Fertilizers up to 30%.
Without green manures applies 375kgs/ha, With green manure applies
250kgs/ha.
•Pest management.:- Application of Neem oil 3000ppm reduces the Pest
infestation.
•Promotion of organic pesticides, fertilizers and other botanicals.:- Seed
treatment with Pseudomonas, Application of PSB 10kgs/ha,
•Application of Weedicide:- Application of Weedicides as pre-emergence
and Post-emergence will reduces cost.
V Cost Reduction
VI. Extensions and Capacity building•Polam pilusthondhi- schedule detailed information required •ChandrannaRythukshetralu
Sl. No. Mandal DateVillage visited
8.30AM to 12.00noon 2.00PM to 5.30PM1 2 3 4 51 Thonduru 2.06.15
2 Thonduru 3.06.15 Inaganuru,PaluruAgaduru, Saanthakovvurru
3 Thonduru 4.06.15Sydapuram, Gundlamadugu
Thelluru,Maduru
4 Thonduru 5.06.15 Udavagandla Goturu
5 Thonduru 6.06.15 Mallela,Thonduru Mallela,Thonduru
6 Thonduru 08.06.15 Bhadrampalli,Buchupalli Bodivaripalli
7 Thonduru 09.06.15 Santhakovuru Paluru
8 Thonduru 10.06.15 Agadur Inagalur
9 Thonduru 16.06.15 S.Cherlopalli Yadavavaripalli
10 Thonduru 17.06.15 Udavagandla Gangadevipalli
11 Thonduru 23.06.15 Mallela Madur
12 Thonduru 24.06.15 Yadavakunta Balijapalli
13 Thonduru 30.06.15 Buchupalli Bodivaripalli
VI. Extensions and Capacity building
Sl. No. Mandal DateVillage visited
8.30AM to 12.00noon 2.00PM to 5.30PM1 2 3 4 5
14 Thonduru 01.07.15 Gotur Thimmapurampeta
15 Thonduru 07.07.15 Bhadrapalli B.Kothapalli
16 Thonduru 08.07.15 Teluru Thummalapalli
17 Thonduru 14.07.15 Thondur Koravanipalli
18 Thonduru15.07.15
Sydapuram Jalaparthi
19 Thonduru 21.07.15 Ganganapalli Pothulapalli
20 Thonduru 22.07.15 Gundlamadugu Krishnamgaripalli
21 Thonduru 28.07.15 Santhakovuru Paluru
22 Thonduru 29.07.15 Agadur Inagalur
23 Thonduru 04.08.15 S.Cherlopalli Yadavavaripalli
24 Thonduru 05.08.15 Udavagandla Gangadevipalli
25 Thonduru 11.08.15 Mallela Madur
26 Thonduru 12.08.15 Yadavakunta Balijapalli
VI. Extensions and Capacity building
Sl. No. Mandal DateVillage visited
8.30AM to 12.00noon 2.00PM to 5.30PM
1 2 3 4 5
27 Thonduru 18.08.15 Buchupalli Bodivaripalli
28 Thonduru19.08.15
Gotur Thimmapurampeta
29 Thonduru25.08.15
Bhadrapalli B.Kothapalli
30 Thonduru26.08.15
Teluru T.Thummalapalli
31 Thonduru01.09.15
Thondur Koravanipalli
32 Thonduru02.9.15
Sydapuram Jalaparthi
33 Thonduru08.09.15
Ganganapalli Pothulapalli
34 Thonduru09.09.15
Gundlamadugu Krishnamgaripalli
35 Thonduru15.09.15
Santhakovuru Paluru
36 Thonduru16.09.15
Agadur Inagalur
37 Thonduru22.09.15
S.Cherlopalli Yadavavaripalli
38 Thonduru23.09.15
Udavagandla Gangadevipalli
39 Thonduru29.09.15
Mallela Madur
Statement showing the details of CRKs proposals in Thondur for the Year 2015-16
Sl. No.
Division
Mandal
Area covered under Chandranna Rythu Kshetralu in Ha
Total CRK
Division
Wise
Paddy
MaizeBeng
al Gram
Cotton
(Kappas)
Ground Nut
Sunflower
Sesamum
JowarOther crops
1 Muddanur Thondur 0 0 10 0 10 0 0 0 0 20
•Special awareness programs and trainings conducted to
MPEOs and Farmers in highlighting cost reduction and
promotion of Natural Farming.:- Trainings organized on
Organic Farming in Co-ordination with Scientists from
KVK, ARS, DAATT center.
•Identification of Best Adoptive Farmers as Master
Trainers.:-
•Involvement RMGs, SHGs, NGOs & other Organisations.
•Exposure of farmers to CMSA villages.
VI. Extensions and Capacity building
•Farm machinery- item wise required to cover 100%.:-
Rotavators-20no.s, 9-Tyne cultivators-45 no.s, 7-Tyne Cultivators-25
no.s, Seed drills-100 no.s, Combined paddy Harvesters- 5no.s, Taiwan
sprayers-50no.s, Tarpaulins-500 no.s, MCTs-15no.s, CHC(Cotton)-
10no.s, ISS-10No.s
•Action plan for supply of farm machinery as per allocation 2015-16.:-
Planned In JBMV program and collected implement wise Farmer
details. After allotment details intimated to the Farmers.
•Cost reduction through farm mechanization .:- Cost is reduced by
application of Rotavator up to Rs. 2000/ha, By application of
Mechanized harvesting it reduces up to Rs.2200/ha. Use threshing
Machinery reduces cost upto Rs.2500/ha.
•Enhancement of yields through farm mechanization:- Nil
•Farm Mechanisation
Statement showing the Mandal wise component wise category wisebudget allocation Under NSP during-2015-16 -Thonduru
Mandal.
S.No MandalName of the implement Phy Fin Remarks
1 ThonduruTractor Drawn Implements 29 2.87
2 Thonduru Rotavators 4 2
3 ThonduruPlant protection
equipment 31 1.14
4 Thonduru Diesel engines 4 0.4
5 Thonduru Power Tiller 1 0.75
6 Thonduru Mini Tractors 0 0
7 Thonduru Tarpalins(HDPE) 119 1.48
8 Thonduru Trapalins(MCL) 18 0.225
•Enrolment of farmers to M-Kissan portal.:- 1. This fastens the
advising of the Farmers. 2.This creates awareness on Modern
practices 3.
•All beneficiary farmers of all schemes of department to be enrolled
in M- Kissan.:- 1.This is useful to get the details of Farmers who
availed schemes previously 2. This prevents repetition, there by
more Farmers availing Scheme benefits.
VIII. IT – Applications
The Thondur mandal people are mainly depending on Agriculture
and majority of the farmers are big and marginal farmers. They
cultivating Bengalgram as major rain fed crop for their Livelyhood and
also growing paddy, Cotton as a major crops in Kharif.
The soils also having poor organic carbon, low Nitrogen, P2O5
medium and having High K2O and also deficient in micro nutrients such
as Zinc. Advocating of farmers through Department personnel adopting
Neam Coated Urea and Straight Fertilizers to improve Fertilizere use
Efficiency and micronutrients application in all the crops to correct the
deficiencies.
Conclusion:
The extension staff of the mandal are extensively giving wide
publicity though trainings and distributing Phamplets to create
awareness to all the farmers on Soil sampling and advantages of soil
sampling, duly adopting the Soil test based fertilizer application for all
the crops.
The rural poor living standards and economical standards there is
a need of technology transfer to the farmer by giving trainings,
exposure visits, conducting Demos with increases the capacity
building of the individual farmer will increases the confidence Leeds to
adopt new practices in future for getting better results. Promoting farm
mechanization, organic farming, and application of Bio agents reduce
the cost of cultivation and maintains the ecology.
Due to above efforts of the Department the cost benefit ratio of
farming community in the mandal has been increased which results in
successful achievement of double digit growth for the year 2015-16.
Conclusion: