DONOR CHARTS - OECD...4% OVERVIEW Gender Equality Focus of DAC Members’ Aid by Sector Average...
38
Aid in Support of Gender Equality and Women’s Empowerment DONOR CHARTS March 2019 Statistics based on DAC Members’ reporting on the Gender Equality Policy Marker, 2016-2017 Creditor Reporting System database
Transcript of DONOR CHARTS - OECD...4% OVERVIEW Gender Equality Focus of DAC Members’ Aid by Sector Average...
Aid in Support of Gender Equality and Women’s Empowerment
DONOR CHARTS
March 2019
Statistics based on DAC Members’ reporting on the Gender Equality Policy Marker, 2016-2017
Creditor Reporting System database
DEFINITION
THE GENDER EQUALITY POLICY MARKER
DEFINITION
An activity should be classified as gender equality focused (score Principal or Significant) if:
It is intended to advance gender equality and women’s empowerment or reduce discrimination and inequalities based on sex.
CRITERIA FOR ELIGIBILITY Gender equality is explicitly promoted in activity documentation through specific measures which:
a) Reduce social, economic or political power inequalities between women and men, girls and boys, ensure that women benefit equally with men from the activity, or compensate for past discrimination; or
b) Develop or strengthen gender equality or anti-discrimination policies, legislation or institutions.
This approach requires analysing gender inequalities either separately or as an integral part of agencies’ standard procedures.
EXAMPLES OF TYPICAL ACTIVITIES
Examples of activities that could be marked as principal objective:
-- legal literacy for women and girls; -- male networks against gender violence; -- a social safety net project which focuses specifically on assisting women and girls as a particularly disadvantaged group in a society; -- capacity building of Ministries of Finance and Planning to incorporate gender equality objectives in national poverty reduction or comparable strategies.
Such activities can target women specifically, men specifically or both women and men. Examples of activities that could be marked as significant
objective:
-- activity which has as its principal objective to provide drinking water to a district or community while at the same time ensuring that women and girls have safe and easy access to the facilities; -- a social safety net project which focuses on the community as a whole and ensures that women and girls benefit equally with men and boys.
N.B. Support to women’s equality organisations and institutions (CRS sector code 15170) scores, by definition, principal objective.
OVERVIEW
Gender Equality Focus of DAC Members’ Aid by Sector Average annual value of commitments in 2016-2017
constant 2016 USD 44.8 billion
Coverage – All DAC members, except one, report on the gender equality focus of their aid. As from 2010 data, the calculation of allocable aid is no longer based on sectors but on types of aid. This new methodology slightly extends the scope of aid screened, mainly with the inclusion of humanitarian aid. The calculation includes the following types of aid: sector budget support, core support to NGOs, support to specific funds managed by international organisations, pooled funding, projects, donor country personnel and other technical assistance, and scholarships in donor country. The term bilateral allocable aid in this publication refers to this methodology.
These charts are based on commitment data, which best reflect current policies by donors. A two-year average is given, as the focus and volume of commitments vary from year to year. DAC members use a ‘marker’ to identify activities that have gender equality as a principal or significant objective. Reporting has strongly improved over the years, and although some members encounter difficulties in applying the methodology, the currently available data nevertheless give a reliable indication of the extent to which those donors that report address gender equality in their aid programmes.
10%
7%
8%
5%
18%
4%3%3%
7%
10%
2%
3%
8%
12%
Education
Health
Population Pol./Progr. & Reproductive Health
Water Supply & Sanitation
Government & Civil Society, incl. Conflict Prevention
Other Social Infrastructure & Services
Other Economic Infrastrustures & Services
Energy
Business, Banking &Financial Services
Agriculture & Rural Development
Other Multisector
General Environment Protection
Industry, Mining,Construction, Trade &
Tourim
USD 44.8 bn
Humanitarian Aid
AID AT A GLANCE - DONORS' CHARTS
The following charts (2016-2017 average) summarise statistics on aid focused on gender equality and women’s empowerment extended by each DAC member. Information shown includes the gender equality policy marker coverage, the top ten recipients and a sector breakdown of aid focused on gender equality and women’s empowerment.
Charts are not shown for Hungary which became DAC member in 2016 and did not report on the marker in 2016 and 2017.
Guidance for the interpretation of the charts: The first element to take into account when analysing the data for one country or when comparing data between countries is the COVERAGE RATIO, i.e. the proportion of aid which is screened. A high percentage of gender equality focused aid ALONE does not mean that aid is well aligned with the gender equality policy objective, such a conclusion would only be valid for a donor with 100% coverage. When comparing data between donors, both coverage ratio and % of aid focused on gender equality and women’s empowerment have to be considered. (A number of members do not screen contributions that are by nature likely to fall under the “not targeted” category, e.g. imputed student costs. Therefore, a high amount in the category “not screened” generally increases the percentage of gender equality focused aid significantly.)
Percentage of ODA focused on gender equality in Bilateral Allocable Aid 2016-2017 average
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
%
Principal Significant
Aid in support of Gender Equality and Women’s Empowerment, 2016-2017 average (2016 USD million)
Note: An activity can target gender equality as a "principal objective" or "significant objective". Principal means gender equality was an explicit objective of the activity and fundamental in its design. Significant means gender equality was an important, but secondary objective of the activity. Not targeted means that the activity was screened for promoting gender equality, but was found to not target it.
Principal Significant
Sub-Total:
Gender
Equality
focused
as % of aid
screenedNot targeted
Total:
aid screenedNot screened
Bilateral
allocable, total
a b c = a + b c / e d e = c + d f
Australia 220 961 1,181 60 784 1,965 123 2,088 26 31
Austria 7 97 104 42 142 246 67 313 3 1
Belgium 33 449 481 56 378 859 1 861 0 5
Canada 196 1,895 2,091 76 663 2,753 0 2,753 1 45
Czech Republic 2 13 16 48 17 33 17 50 0 0
Denmark 66 324 390 36 705 1,095 148 1,244 4 0
EU Institutions 363 9,714 10,077 47 11,156 21,233 0 21,233 56 16
Finland 30 203 232 58 169 402 1 402 5 1
France 209 1,611 1,820 31 3,993 5,813 1,132 6,945 1 1
Germany 182 6,291 6,472 40 9,789 16,262 486 16,748 28 4
Greece 0 3 3 23 11 14 0 14 0 0
Hungary .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 38 0 0
Iceland 3 19 22 82 5 27 0 27 1 0
Ireland 56 269 324 86 55 379 18 398 7 5
Italy 42 398 440 50 432 872 198 1,070 13 2
Japan 108 6,136 6,243 34 12,042 18,286 1,129 19,415 35 3
Korea 55 246 301 13 1,986 2,287 2 2,288 3 2
Luxembourg 21 61 82 31 182 263 0 263 2 1
Netherlands 405 1,042 1,448 62 890 2,338 0 2,338 57 3
New Zealand 7 162 169 48 185 354 0 354 1 0
Norway 110 577 687 27 1,888 2,575 0 2,575 42 27
Poland 1 2 4 2 147 151 0 151 0 0
Portugal 1 33 35 28 87 122 0 122 0 0
Slovak Republic 0 10 10 38 17 27 1 28 0 0
Slovenia 0 1 2 37 3 5 6 11 0 0
Spain 96 179 276 45 334 610 0 610 25 11
Sweden 530 1,450 1,980 87 286 2,266 94 2,360 81 17
Switzerland 67 658 725 40 1,079 1,804 145 1,949 6 9
United Kingdom 320 2,790 3,110 46 3,648 6,758 0 6,758 27 9
United States 1,502 4,606 6,109 22 21,121 27,229 0 27,229 4 0
Total DAC members 4,634 40,199 44,833 38 72,196 117,029 3,570 120,638 430 194
Support to
women's equality
organisations
and institutions
both included in (a)
Ending
violence
against
women and
girls
Australia
2016 2017
Principal objective 215 225
Significant objective 1,112 810
Not targeted 517 1,052
Not screened 247 0
Total bilateral allocable aid 2,091 2,086
Gender equality focused aid (3) 72% 50%
Memo:
Total non bilateral allocable aid 200 166
Included in principal:
- Aid to Women's equality organisations 22 29
- Ending violence against women 38 24
Contribution to UN Women (multilateral) 9 10
(*) break in bilateral allocable calculation method in 2010
Papua New Guinea 347 346 55%
Indonesia 223 215 72%
Solomon Islands 110 110 69%
Timor-Leste 61 61 66%
Afghanistan 59 59 63%
Cambodia 56 56 38%
Myanmar 55 55 80%
Philippines 52 52 58%
Fiji 51 51 72%
Viet Nam 45 45 50%
Papua New Guinea 346 185 55%
Indonesia 215 154 72%
Solomon Islands 110 64 69%
Myanmar 55 43 80%
Timor-Leste 61 38 66%
Fiji 51 35 72%
Bangladesh 39 32 83%
Afghanistan 59 32 63%
Philippines 52 29 58%
Vanuatu 44 24 56%
Aid in Support of Gender Equality and Women's Empowerment2016-2017
(1)
An activity can target gender equality as a "principal objective" or "significant objective". Principal means gender equality was an explicit objective of the activity and
fundemental in its design. Significant means gender equality was an important, but secondary, objective of the activity. Not targeted means that the activity was
screened for promoting gender equality, but was not found to have targeted it.
The use of the recommendended minimum criteria for the marker by some members in recent years can result in lower levels of aid reported as focused on gender
equality (2).
Not all activities have been screened against the gender marker: the coverage ratio for bilateral allocable activities is 94%.
Gender equality focus of donor's aid programme2016 USD million
(1) Amounts are average commitments for 2015-2016, unless otherwise shown
Sector breakdown Top ten recipients
Percentage of gender equality focused aid by sector Gender equality focus in aid to
top ten recipients 2016 USD million
Total aid Total bilateral
allocable aid
Gender
equality
focused aid (3)
Top ten recipients of gender equality
focused aidGender equality focus of sectors
2016 USD million2016 USD million
Total bilateral
allocable aid
Gender equality focused aid
(3)
(2) Handbook on the OECD-DAC Gender Equality Policy Marker 2016
(3) % of bilateral allocable aid excluding activities not screened against the gender equality marker.
Note: Statistics on gender focus exclude bilateral non-allocable aid since several members do not apply the gender marker on these forms of aid. This category
includes programme assistance (e.g. general budget support...), debt relief and in-donor expenses.
Source: (Creditor Reporting System) CRS Aid Activity database at http://oe.cd/oda-gender
020406080
100
Economicinfrastructure
Education
Government and civilsociety
Health
MultisectorOther social
infrastructure
Population andreproductive health
Production
Water and sanitation
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
Education Health andPopulation
Other SocialInfrast., incl.
Women'sequality
EconomicInfrastructure
Production Multisector
Gender equality focused aid Not targeted Not screened
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
0
400
800
1200
1600
2000
2002-03 04-05 06-07 08-09 *10-11 12-13 14-15 2016-17
Significant Principal Gender Eq. focused, %
2016 USD million % of bilateral allocable
Right hand scale
Left hand scale
Austria
2016 2017
Principal objective 7 8
Significant objective 89 104
Not targeted 118 166
Not screened 109 25
Total bilateral allocable aid 323 303
Gender equality focused aid (3) 45% 40%
Memo:
Total non bilateral allocable aid 753 313
Included in principal:
- Aid to Women's equality organisations 3 2
- Ending violence against women 0 1
Contribution to UN Women (multilateral) 0 0
(*) break in bilateral allocable calculation method in 2010
Turkey 58 41 1%
Bosnia and Herzegovina 20 1 15%
Ukraine 16 7 62%
Uganda 13 13 77%
Serbia 13 2 47%
Ethiopia 12 12 82%
Iran 11 0 13%
Kosovo 10 6 80%
Albania 9 7 27%
Syrian Arab Republic 9 7 75%
Uganda 13 10 77%
Ethiopia 12 10 82%
Syrian Arab Republic 7 5 75%
Kosovo 6 4 80%
Ukraine 7 4 62%
Burkina Faso 5 4 77%
Iraq 6 3 50%
Georgia 6 3 52%
West Bank and Gaza Strip 6 3 51%
Moldova 4 2 57%
Aid in Support of Gender Equality and Women's Empowerment2016-2017
(1)
An activity can target gender equality as a "principal objective" or "significant objective". Principal means gender equality was an explicit objective of the activity and
fundemental in its design. Significant means gender equality was an important, but secondary, objective of the activity. Not targeted means that the activity was
screened for promoting gender equality, but was not found to have targeted it.
The use of the recommendended minimum criteria for the marker by some members in recent years can result in lower levels of aid reported as focused on gender
equality (2).
Not all activities have been screened against the gender marker: the coverage ratio for bilateral allocable activities is 79%.
Gender equality focus of donor's aid programme2016 USD million
(1) Amounts are average commitments for 2015-2016, unless otherwise shown
Sector breakdown Top ten recipients
Percentage of gender equality focused aid by sector Gender equality focus in aid to
top ten recipients 2016 USD million
Total aid Total bilateral
allocable aid
Gender
equality
focused aid (3)
Top ten recipients of gender equality
focused aidGender equality focus of sectors
2016 USD million2016 USD million
Total bilateral
allocable aid
Gender equality focused aid
(3)
(2) Handbook on the OECD-DAC Gender Equality Policy Marker 2016
(3) % of bilateral allocable aid excluding activities not screened against the gender equality marker.
Note: Statistics on gender focus exclude bilateral non-allocable aid since several members do not apply the gender marker on these forms of aid. This category
includes programme assistance (e.g. general budget support...), debt relief and in-donor expenses.
Source: (Creditor Reporting System) CRS Aid Activity database at http://oe.cd/oda-gender
020406080
100
Economicinfrastructure
Education
Government and civilsociety
Health
MultisectorOther social
infrastructure
Population andreproductive health
Production
Water and sanitation
0
20
40
60
80
100
Education Health andPopulation
Other SocialInfrast., incl.
Women'sequality
EconomicInfrastructure
Production Multisector
Gender equality focused aid Not targeted Not screened
0%
8%
16%
24%
32%
40%
0
20
40
60
80
100
2002-03 04-05 06-07 08-09 *10-11 12-13 14-15 2016-17
Significant Principal Gender Eq. focused, %
2016 USD million % of bilateral allocable
Right hand scaleLeft hand scale
Belgium
2016 2017
Principal objective 36 29
Significant objective 435 462
Not targeted 425 331
Not screened 2 0
Total bilateral allocable aid 899 822
Gender equality focused aid (3) 53% 60%
Memo:
Total non bilateral allocable aid 508 598
Included in principal:
- Aid to Women's equality organisations 0 0
- Ending violence against women 7 3
Contribution to UN Women (multilateral) 4 17
(*) break in bilateral allocable calculation method in 2010
Democratic Republic of the Congo 104 103 56%
Turkey 38 38 18%
Niger 32 31 90%
Kenya 28 28 7%
Rwanda 28 27 60%
Uganda 25 25 91%
Mozambique 20 20 38%
Burkina Faso 19 19 80%
Mali 18 17 88%
Burundi 18 17 66%
Democratic Republic of the Congo 103 57 56%
Niger 31 28 90%
Uganda 25 23 91%
Rwanda 27 16 60%
Mali 17 15 88%
Burkina Faso 19 15 80%
West Bank and Gaza Strip 14 13 96%
Benin 16 13 84%
Iraq 14 12 83%
Burundi 17 11 66%
(2) Handbook on the OECD-DAC Gender Equality Policy Marker 2016
(3) % of bilateral allocable aid excluding activities not screened against the gender equality marker.
Note: Statistics on gender focus exclude bilateral non-allocable aid since several members do not apply the gender marker on these forms of aid. This category
includes programme assistance (e.g. general budget support...), debt relief and in-donor expenses.
Source: (Creditor Reporting System) CRS Aid Activity database at http://oe.cd/oda-gender
(1) Amounts are average commitments for 2015-2016, unless otherwise shown
Sector breakdown Top ten recipients
Percentage of gender equality focused aid by sector Gender equality focus in aid to
top ten recipients 2016 USD million
Total aid Total bilateral
allocable aid
Gender
equality
focused aid (3)
Top ten recipients of gender equality
focused aidGender equality focus of sectors
2016 USD million2016 USD million
Total bilateral
allocable aid
Gender equality focused aid
(3)
An activity can target gender equality as a "principal objective" or "significant objective". Principal means gender equality was an explicit objective of the activity and
fundemental in its design. Significant means gender equality was an important, but secondary, objective of the activity. Not targeted means that the activity was
screened for promoting gender equality, but was not found to have targeted it.
The use of the recommendended minimum criteria for the marker by some members in recent years can result in lower levels of aid reported as focused on gender
equality (2).
All activities have been screened against the gender marker: the gender coverage ratio is thus 100%.
Gender equality focus of donor's aid programme2016 USD million
Aid in Support of Gender Equality and Women's Empowerment2016-2017
(1)
020406080
100
Economicinfrastructure
Education
Government and civilsociety
Health
MultisectorOther social
infrastructure
Population andreproductive health
Production
Water and sanitation
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
Education Health andPopulation
Other SocialInfrast., incl.
Women'sequality
EconomicInfrastructure
Production Multisector
Gender equality focused aid Not targeted Not screened
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
0
200
400
600
800
2006-07 08-09 *10-11 12-13 14-15 2016-17
Significant Principal Gender Eq. focused, %
2016 USD million % of bilateral allocable
Right hand scale
Left hand scale
Canada
2016 2017
Principal objective 116 276
Significant objective 2,197 1,592
Not targeted 1,042 284
Not screened 0 0
Total bilateral allocable aid 3,354 2,153
Gender equality focused aid (3) 69% 87%
Memo:
Total non bilateral allocable aid 551 427
Included in principal:
- Aid to Women's equality organisations 0 3
- Ending violence against women 13 78
Contribution to UN Women (multilateral) 5 5
(*) break in bilateral allocable calculation method in 2010
Syrian Arab Republic 127 127 29%
Afghanistan 127 127 95%
Jordan 126 126 80%
Haiti 122 122 78%
Ethiopia 108 108 83%
Iraq 103 103 86%
Lebanon 88 88 74%
Ghana 87 87 98%
Mozambique 87 83 95%
Tanzania 80 80 88%
Afghanistan 127 120 95%
Jordan 126 101 80%
Haiti 122 96 78%
Ethiopia 108 90 83%
Iraq 103 89 86%
Ghana 87 85 98%
Mozambique 83 79 95%
Tanzania 80 70 88%
South Sudan 80 65 82%
Lebanon 88 65 74%
Aid in Support of Gender Equality and Women's Empowerment2016-2017
(1)
An activity can target gender equality as a "principal objective" or "significant objective". Principal means gender equality was an explicit objective of the activity and
fundemental in its design. Significant means gender equality was an important, but secondary, objective of the activity. Not targeted means that the activity was
screened for promoting gender equality, but was not found to have targeted it.
The use of the recommendended minimum criteria for the marker by some members in recent years can result in lower levels of aid reported as focused on gender
equality (2).
All activities have been screened against the gender marker: the gender coverage ratio is thus 100%.
Gender equality focus of donor's aid programme2016 USD million
(1) Amounts are average commitments for 2015-2016, unless otherwise shown
Sector breakdown Top ten recipients
Percentage of gender equality focused aid by sector Gender equality focus in aid to
top ten recipients 2016 USD million
Total aid Total bilateral
allocable aid
Gender
equality
focused aid (3)
Top ten recipients of gender equality
focused aidGender equality focus of sectors
2016 USD million2016 USD million
Total bilateral
allocable aid
Gender equality focused aid
(3)
(2) Handbook on the OECD-DAC Gender Equality Policy Marker 2016
(3) % of bilateral allocable aid excluding activities not screened against the gender equality marker.
Note: Statistics on gender focus exclude bilateral non-allocable aid since several members do not apply the gender marker on these forms of aid. This category
includes programme assistance (e.g. general budget support...), debt relief and in-donor expenses.
Source: (Creditor Reporting System) CRS Aid Activity database at http://oe.cd/oda-gender
020406080
100
Economicinfrastructure
Education
Government and civilsociety
Health
MultisectorOther social
infrastructure
Population andreproductive health
Production
Water and sanitation
0
200
400
600
800
1000
Education Health andPopulation
Other SocialInfrast., incl.
Women'sequality
EconomicInfrastructure
Production Multisector
Gender equality focused aid Not targeted Not screened
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
0
600
1200
1800
2400
2002-03 04-05 06-07 08-09 *10-11 12-13 14-15 2016-17
Significant Principal Gender Eq. focused, %
2016 USD million % of bilateral allocable
Right hand scale
Left hand scale
Czech Republic
2016 2017
Principal objective 1 4
Significant objective 5 22
Not targeted 24 11
Not screened 19 16
Total bilateral allocable aid 48 53
Gender equality focused aid (3) 18% 71%
Memo:
Total non bilateral allocable aid 24 25
Included in principal:
- Aid to Women's equality organisations 0.15 0.14
- Ending violence against women 0.05 0.00
Contribution to UN Women (multilateral) 0.02 0.02
Moldova 4.7 4.7 32%
Jordan 3.8 3.8 95%
Ethiopia 3.5 3.5 63%
Bosnia and Herzegovina 3.3 3.3 23%
Georgia 3.3 3.2 51%
Ukraine 2.8 2.8 54%
Serbia 2.2 2.2 38%
Iraq 2.2 2.2 84%
Syrian Arab Republic 2.1 1.9 93%
Mongolia 1.8 1.8 9%
Ethiopia 3.5 2.1 63%
Georgia 3.2 1.4 51%
Moldova 4.7 1.4 32%
Afghanistan 1.8 1.0 61%
Ukraine 2.8 0.8 54%
Syrian Arab Republic 1.9 0.8 93%
Bosnia and Herzegovina 3.3 0.7 23%
Libya 0.6 0.6 100%
Cambodia 1.7 0.5 29%
Lebanon 0.5 0.5 95%
Aid in Support of Gender Equality and Women's Empowerment2016-2017
(1)
An activity can target gender equality as a "principal objective" or "significant objective". Principal means gender equality was an explicit objective of the activity and
fundemental in its design. Significant means gender equality was an important, but secondary, objective of the activity. Not targeted means that the activity was
screened for promoting gender equality, but was not found to have targeted it.
The use of the recommendended minimum criteria for the marker by some members in recent years can result in lower levels of aid reported as focused on gender
equality (2).
Not all activities have been screened against the gender marker: the coverage ratio for bilateral allocable activities is 65%.
Gender equality focus of donor's aid programme2016 USD million
(1) Amounts are average commitments for 2015-2016, unless otherwise shown
Sector breakdown Top ten recipients
Percentage of gender equality focused aid by sector Gender equality focus in aid to
top ten recipients 2016 USD million
Total aid Total bilateral
allocable aid
Gender
equality
focused aid (3)
Top ten recipients of gender equality
focused aidGender equality focus of sectors
2016 USD million2016 USD million
Total bilateral
allocable aid
Gender equality focused aid
(3)
(2) Handbook on the OECD-DAC Gender Equality Policy Marker 2016
(3) % of bilateral allocable aid excluding activities not screened against the gender equality marker.
Note: Statistics on gender focus exclude bilateral non-allocable aid since several members do not apply the gender marker on these forms of aid. This category
includes programme assistance (e.g. general budget support...), debt relief and in-donor expenses.
Source: (Creditor Reporting System) CRS Aid Activity database at http://oe.cd/oda-gender
020406080
100
Economicinfrastructure
Education
Government and civilsociety
Health
MultisectorOther social
infrastructure
Population andreproductive health
Production
Water and sanitation
0
5
10
15
20
Education Health andPopulation
Other SocialInfrast., incl.
Women'sequality
EconomicInfrastructure
Production Multisector
Gender equality focused aid Not targeted Not screened
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
0
8
16
24
32
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Significant Principal Gender Eq. focused, %
2016 USD million % of bilateral allocable
Right hand scale
Left hand scale
Denmark
2016 2017
Principal objective 35 117
Significant objective 350 374
Not targeted 580 847
Not screened 189 107
Total bilateral allocable aid 1,154 1,446
Gender equality focused aid (3) 40% 37%
Memo:
Total non bilateral allocable aid 357 38
Included in principal:
- Aid to Women's equality organisations 4 4
- Ending violence against women 0 0
Contribution to UN Women (multilateral) 9 9
(*) break in bilateral allocable calculation method in 2010
Afghanistan 59 59 52%
Mozambique 52 52 42%
Myanmar 47 47 83%
Burkina Faso 46 34 99%
Bangladesh 43 43 80%
Syrian Arab Republic 41 41 7%
West Bank and Gaza Strip 33 33 59%
Mali 30 30 49%
Iraq 28 28 0%
Tanzania 25 25 93%
Myanmar 47 36 83%
Bangladesh 43 34 80%
Burkina Faso 34 33 99%
Afghanistan 59 30 52%
Tanzania 25 23 93%
Mozambique 52 22 42%
West Bank and Gaza Strip 33 19 59%
Nepal 17 15 91%
Ethiopia 20 15 86%
Niger 15 15 100%
(2) Handbook on the OECD-DAC Gender Equality Policy Marker 2016
(3) % of bilateral allocable aid excluding activities not screened against the gender equality marker.
Note: Statistics on gender focus exclude bilateral non-allocable aid since several members do not apply the gender marker on these forms of aid. This category
includes programme assistance (e.g. general budget support...), debt relief and in-donor expenses.
Source: (Creditor Reporting System) CRS Aid Activity database at http://oe.cd/oda-gender
(1) Amounts are average commitments for 2015-2016, unless otherwise shown
Sector breakdown Top ten recipients
Percentage of gender equality focused aid by sector Gender equality focus in aid to
top ten recipients 2016 USD million
Total aid Total bilateral
allocable aid
Gender
equality
focused aid (3)
Top ten recipients of gender equality
focused aidGender equality focus of sectors
2016 USD million2016 USD million
Total bilateral
allocable aid
Gender equality focused aid
(3)
An activity can target gender equality as a "principal objective" or "significant objective". Principal means gender equality was an explicit objective of the activity and
fundemental in its design. Significant means gender equality was an important, but secondary, objective of the activity. Not targeted means that the activity was
screened for promoting gender equality, but was not found to have targeted it.
The use of the recommendended minimum criteria for the marker by some members in recent years can result in lower levels of aid reported as focused on gender
equality (2).
Not all activities have been screened against the gender marker: the coverage ratio for bilateral allocable activities is 88%.
Gender equality focus of donor's aid programme2016 USD million
Aid in Support of Gender Equality and Women's Empowerment2016-2017
(1)
020406080
100
Economicinfrastructure
Education
Government and civilsociety
Health
MultisectorOther social
infrastructure
Population andreproductive health
Production
Water and sanitation
0
100
200
300
400
Education Health andPopulation
Other SocialInfrast., incl.
Women'sequality
EconomicInfrastructure
Production Multisector
Gender equality focused aid Not targeted Not screened
0%
15%
30%
45%
60%
0
200
400
600
800
2002-03 04-05 06-07 08-09 *10-11 12-13 14-15 2016-17
Significant Principal Gender Eq. focused, %
2016 USD million % of bilateral allocable
Right hand scale
Left hand scale
EU Institutions
2016 2017
Principal objective 206 521
Significant objective 9,572 9,855
Not targeted 11,998 10,313
Not screened 0 0
Total bilateral allocable aid 21,776 20,690
Gender equality focused aid (3) 45% 50%
Memo:
Total non bilateral allocable aid 1,505 1,407
Included in principal:
- Aid to Women's equality organisations 11 101
- Ending violence against women 3 28
Contribution to UN Women (multilateral) 0 0
(*) break in bilateral allocable calculation method in 2010
Turkey 2,832 2,831 31%
Morocco 682 677 23%
Ukraine 624 624 35%
Tunisia 584 584 35%
Syrian Arab Republic 426 426 46%
Serbia 422 422 11%
Afghanistan 373 261 81%
West Bank and Gaza Strip 333 333 59%
Niger 332 287 73%
Ethiopia 315 315 33%
Turkey 2,831 871 31%
Rwanda 229 222 97%
Ukraine 624 216 35%
Afghanistan 261 212 81%
Niger 287 209 73%
Tunisia 584 206 35%
Somalia 314 204 65%
Uganda 219 200 91%
West Bank and Gaza Strip 333 197 59%
Syrian Arab Republic 426 196 46%
Aid in Support of Gender Equality and Women's Empowerment2016-2017
(1)
An activity can target gender equality as a "principal objective" or "significant objective". Principal means gender equality was an explicit objective of the activity and
fundemental in its design. Significant means gender equality was an important, but secondary, objective of the activity. Not targeted means that the activity was
screened for promoting gender equality, but was not found to have targeted it.
The use of the recommendended minimum criteria for the marker by some members in recent years can result in lower levels of aid reported as focused on gender
equality (2).
All activities have been screened against the gender marker: the gender coverage ratio is thus 100%.
Gender equality focus of donor's aid programme2016 USD million
(1) Amounts are average commitments for 2015-2016, unless otherwise shown
Sector breakdown Top ten recipients
Percentage of gender equality focused aid by sector Gender equality focus in aid to
top ten recipients 2016 USD million
Total aid Total bilateral
allocable aid
Gender
equality
focused aid (3)
Top ten recipients of gender equality
focused aidGender equality focus of sectors
2016 USD million2016 USD million
Total bilateral
allocable aid
Gender equality focused aid
(3)
(2) Handbook on the OECD-DAC Gender Equality Policy Marker 2016
(3) % of bilateral allocable aid excluding activities not screened against the gender equality marker.
Note: Statistics on gender focus exclude bilateral non-allocable aid since several members do not apply the gender marker on these forms of aid. This category
includes programme assistance (e.g. general budget support...), debt relief and in-donor expenses.
Source: (Creditor Reporting System) CRS Aid Activity database at http://oe.cd/oda-gender
020406080
100
Economicinfrastructure
Education
Government and civilsociety
Health
MultisectorOther social
infrastructure
Population andreproductive health
Production
Water and sanitation
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
7,000
Education Health andPopulation
Other SocialInfrast., incl.
Women'sequality
EconomicInfrastructure
Production Multisector
Gender equality focused aid Not targeted Not screened
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
0
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
2002-03 04-05 06-07 08-09 *10-11 12-13 14-15 2016-17
Significant Principal Gender Eq. focused, %
2016 USD million % of bilateral allocable
Right hand scale
Left hand scale
Finland
2016 2017
Principal objective 22 37
Significant objective 137 268
Not targeted 140 198
Not screened 1 0
Total bilateral allocable aid 301 504
Gender equality focused aid (3) 53% 61%
Memo:
Total non bilateral allocable aid 181 121
Included in principal:
- Aid to Women's equality organisations 5 6
- Ending violence against women 2 0
Contribution to UN Women (multilateral) 0 23
(*) break in bilateral allocable calculation method in 2010
Ethiopia 23 22 90%
Tanzania 19 17 81%
Somalia 17 17 65%
Turkey 15 15 71%
Afghanistan 14 13 61%
Kenya 13 12 62%
Ukraine 13 13 0%
Myanmar 13 12 89%
Syrian Arab Republic 12 12 30%
Mozambique 11 10 100%
Ethiopia 22 20 90%
Tanzania 17 14 81%
Turkey 15 11 71%
Somalia 17 11 65%
Myanmar 12 11 89%
Mozambique 10 10 100%
Afghanistan 13 8 61%
Kenya 12 7 62%
Zambia 7 6 89%
Syrian Arab Republic 12 4 30%
Aid in Support of Gender Equality and Women's Empowerment2016-2017
(1)
An activity can target gender equality as a "principal objective" or "significant objective". Principal means gender equality was an explicit objective of the activity and
fundemental in its design. Significant means gender equality was an important, but secondary, objective of the activity. Not targeted means that the activity was
screened for promoting gender equality, but was not found to have targeted it.
The use of the recommendended minimum criteria for the marker by some members in recent years can result in lower levels of aid reported as focused on gender
equality (2).
All activities have been screened against the gender marker: the gender coverage ratio is thus 100%.
Gender equality focus of donor's aid programme2016 USD million
(1) Amounts are average commitments for 2015-2016, unless otherwise shown
Sector breakdown Top ten recipients
Percentage of gender equality focused aid by sector Gender equality focus in aid to
top ten recipients 2016 USD million
Total aid Total bilateral
allocable aid
Gender
equality
focused aid (3)
Top ten recipients of gender equality
focused aidGender equality focus of sectors
2016 USD million2016 USD million
Total bilateral
allocable aid
Gender equality focused aid
(3)
(2) Handbook on the OECD-DAC Gender Equality Policy Marker 2016
(3) % of bilateral allocable aid excluding activities not screened against the gender equality marker.
Note: Statistics on gender focus exclude bilateral non-allocable aid since several members do not apply the gender marker on these forms of aid. This category
includes programme assistance (e.g. general budget support...), debt relief and in-donor expenses.
Source: (Creditor Reporting System) CRS Aid Activity database at http://oe.cd/oda-gender
020406080
100
Economicinfrastructure
Education
Government and civilsociety
Health
MultisectorOther social
infrastructure
Population andreproductive health
Production
Water and sanitation
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
Education Health andPopulation
Other SocialInfrast., incl.
Women'sequality
EconomicInfrastructure
Production Multisector
Gender equality focused aid Not targeted Not screened
0%
15%
30%
45%
60%
0
100
200
300
400
2002-03 04-05 06-07 08-09 *10-11 12-13 14-15 2016-17
Significant Principal Gender Eq. focused, %
2016 USD million % of bilateral allocable
Right hand scale
Left hand scale
France
2016 2017
Principal objective 150 268
Significant objective 1,305 1,917
Not targeted 3,659 4,326
Not screened 1,320 944
Total bilateral allocable aid 6,435 7,456
Gender equality focused aid (3) 28% 34%
Memo:
Total non bilateral allocable aid 1,930 2,828
Included in principal:
- Aid to Women's equality organisations 2 0
- Ending violence against women 0 2
Contribution to UN Women (multilateral) 1 1
(*) break in bilateral allocable calculation method in 2010
Morocco 476 370 45%
Turkey 411 401 34%
Côte d'Ivoire 353 333 6%
Tunisia 315 271 37%
Iraq 249 10 92%
Colombia 237 222 99%
India 235 222 3%
Senegal 232 199 17%
Gabon 230 175 51%
Indonesia 227 222 1%
Colombia 222 217 99%
Morocco 370 157 45%
Nigeria 195 109 57%
Tunisia 271 95 37%
Turkey 401 92 34%
Gabon 175 88 51%
Angola 81 80 100%
Jordan 159 75 47%
Congo 95 60 64%
Philippines 87 56 66%
Aid in Support of Gender Equality and Women's Empowerment2016-2017
(1)
An activity can target gender equality as a "principal objective" or "significant objective". Principal means gender equality was an explicit objective of the activity and
fundemental in its design. Significant means gender equality was an important, but secondary, objective of the activity. Not targeted means that the activity was
screened for promoting gender equality, but was not found to have targeted it.
The use of the recommendended minimum criteria for the marker by some members in recent years can result in lower levels of aid reported as focused on gender
equality (2).
Not all activities have been screened against the gender marker: the coverage ratio for bilateral allocable activities is 84%.
Gender equality focus of donor's aid programme2016 USD million
(1) Amounts are average commitments for 2015-2016, unless otherwise shown
Sector breakdown Top ten recipients
Percentage of gender equality focused aid by sector Gender equality focus in aid to
top ten recipients 2016 USD million
Total aid Total bilateral
allocable aid
Gender
equality
focused aid (3)
Top ten recipients of gender equality
focused aidGender equality focus of sectors
2016 USD million2016 USD million
Total bilateral
allocable aid
Gender equality focused aid
(3)
(2) Handbook on the OECD-DAC Gender Equality Policy Marker 2016
(3) % of bilateral allocable aid excluding activities not screened against the gender equality marker.
Note: Statistics on gender focus exclude bilateral non-allocable aid since several members do not apply the gender marker on these forms of aid. This category
includes programme assistance (e.g. general budget support...), debt relief and in-donor expenses.
Source: (Creditor Reporting System) CRS Aid Activity database at http://oe.cd/oda-gender
020406080
100
Economicinfrastructure
Education
Government and civilsociety
Health
MultisectorOther social
infrastructure
Population andreproductive health
Production
Water and sanitation
0
500
1 000
1 500
2 000
Education Health andPopulation
Other SocialInfrast., incl.
Women'sequality
EconomicInfrastructure
Production Multisector
Gender equality focused aid Not targeted Not screened
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2008-09 *10-11 12-13 14-15 2016-17
Significant Principal Gender Eq. focused, %
2016 USD million % of bilateral allocable
Right hand scale
Left hand scale
Germany
2016 2017
Principal objective 169 195
Significant objective 6,113 6,469
Not targeted 9,228 10,351
Not screened 870 102
Total bilateral allocable aid 16,379 17,116
Gender equality focused aid (3) 40% 39%
Memo:
Total non bilateral allocable aid 8,266 8,064
Included in principal:
- Aid to Women's equality organisations 23 34
- Ending violence against women 1 8
Contribution to UN Women (multilateral) 5 4
(*) break in bilateral allocable calculation method in 2010
India 1,241 1,135 9%
Syrian Arab Republic 882 836 13%
China (People's Republic of) 844 628 6%
Turkey 675 630 59%
Indonesia 642 610 5%
Iraq 587 581 55%
Afghanistan 507 502 68%
Mexico 370 351 24%
Jordan 329 317 52%
Viet Nam 313 290 7%
Turkey 630 364 59%
Afghanistan 502 341 68%
Iraq 581 321 55%
Lebanon 300 269 90%
Colombia 275 188 68%
Jordan 317 164 52%
Ethiopia 142 115 81%
Syrian Arab Republic 836 107 13%
Democratic Republic of the Congo 133 106 80%
India 1,135 100 9%
Aid in Support of Gender Equality and Women's Empowerment2016-2017
(1)
An activity can target gender equality as a "principal objective" or "significant objective". Principal means gender equality was an explicit objective of the activity and
fundemental in its design. Significant means gender equality was an important, but secondary, objective of the activity. Not targeted means that the activity was
screened for promoting gender equality, but was not found to have targeted it.
The use of the recommendended minimum criteria for the marker by some members in recent years can result in lower levels of aid reported as focused on gender
equality (2).
Not all activities have been screened against the gender marker: the coverage ratio for bilateral allocable activities is 97%.
Gender equality focus of donor's aid programme2016 USD million
(1) Amounts are average commitments for 2015-2016, unless otherwise shown
Sector breakdown Top ten recipients
Percentage of gender equality focused aid by sector Gender equality focus in aid to
top ten recipients 2016 USD million
Total aid Total bilateral
allocable aid
Gender
equality
focused aid (3)
Top ten recipients of gender equality
focused aidGender equality focus of sectors
2016 USD million2016 USD million
Total bilateral
allocable aid
Gender equality focused aid
(3)
(2) Handbook on the OECD-DAC Gender Equality Policy Marker 2016
(3) % of bilateral allocable aid excluding activities not screened against the gender equality marker.
Note: Statistics on gender focus exclude bilateral non-allocable aid since several members do not apply the gender marker on these forms of aid. This category
includes programme assistance (e.g. general budget support...), debt relief and in-donor expenses.
Source: (Creditor Reporting System) CRS Aid Activity database at http://oe.cd/oda-gender
020406080
100
Economicinfrastructure
Education
Government and civilsociety
Health
MultisectorOther social
infrastructure
Population andreproductive health
Production
Water and sanitation
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
Education Health andPopulation
Other SocialInfrast., incl.
Women'sequality
EconomicInfrastructure
Production Multisector
Gender equality focused aid Not targeted Not screened
0%
20%
40%
60%
0
2,000
4,000
6,000
2002-03 04-05 06-07 08-09 *10-11 12-13 14-15 2016-17
Significant Principal Gender Eq. focused, %
2016 USD million % of bilateral allocable
Right hand scale
Left hand scale
Greece
2016 2017
Principal objective 0 0
Significant objective 3 3
Not targeted 8 13
Not screened 0 0
Total bilateral allocable aid 11 16
Gender equality focused aid (3) 25% 21%
Memo:
Total non bilateral allocable aid 148 67
Included in principal:
- Aid to Women's equality organisations 0 0
- Ending violence against women 0 0
Contribution to UN Women (multilateral) 0 0
(*) break in bilateral allocable calculation method in 2010
Turkey 10 10 2%
Albania 0.8 0.8 99%
Egypt 0.3 0.3 100%
Tunisia 0.2 0.2 100%
Syrian Arab Republic 0.2 0.2 13%
Ukraine 0.2 0.2 100%
West Bank and Gaza Strip 0.2 0.2 98%
Serbia 0.2 0.2 98%
Algeria 0.1 0.1 100%
Democratic Republic of the Congo 0.1 0.1 100%
Albania 0.8 0.8 99%
Egypt 0.3 0.3 100%
Turkey 10.3 0.2 2%
Tunisia 0.2 0.2 100%
Ukraine 0.2 0.2 100%
West Bank and Gaza Strip 0.2 0.2 98%
Serbia 0.2 0.2 98%
Algeria 0.1 0.1 100%
Democratic Republic of the Congo 0.1 0.1 100%
Lebanon 0.1 0.1 100%
(2) Handbook on the OECD-DAC Gender Equality Policy Marker 2016
(3) % of bilateral allocable aid excluding activities not screened against the gender equality marker.
Note: Statistics on gender focus exclude bilateral non-allocable aid since several members do not apply the gender marker on these forms of aid. This category
includes programme assistance (e.g. general budget support...), debt relief and in-donor expenses.
Source: (Creditor Reporting System) CRS Aid Activity database at http://oe.cd/oda-gender
(1) Amounts are average commitments for 2015-2016, unless otherwise shown
Sector breakdown Top ten recipients
Percentage of gender equality focused aid by sector Gender equality focus in aid to
top ten recipients 2016 USD million
Total aid Total bilateral
allocable aid
Gender
equality
focused aid (3)
Top ten recipients of gender equality
focused aidGender equality focus of sectors
2016 USD million2016 USD million
Total bilateral
allocable aid
Gender equality focused aid
(3)
An activity can target gender equality as a "principal objective" or "significant objective". Principal means gender equality was an explicit objective of the activity and
fundemental in its design. Significant means gender equality was an important, but secondary, objective of the activity. Not targeted means that the activity was
screened for promoting gender equality, but was not found to have targeted it.
The use of the recommendended minimum criteria for the marker by some members in recent years can result in lower levels of aid reported as focused on gender
equality (2).
All activities have been screened against the gender marker: the gender coverage ratio is thus 100%.
Gender equality focus of donor's aid programme2016 USD million
Aid in Support of Gender Equality and Women's Empowerment2016-2017
(1)
020406080
100
Economicinfrastructure
Education
Government and civilsociety
Health
MultisectorOther social
infrastructure
Population andreproductive health
Production
Water and sanitation
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
Education Health andPopulation
Other SocialInfrast., incl.
Women'sequality
EconomicInfrastructure
Production Multisector
Gender equality focused aid Not targeted Not screened
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
0
20
40
60
80
100
2002-03 04-05 06-07 08-09 *10-11 12-13 14-15 2016-17
Significant Principal Gender Eq. focused, %
2016 USD million % of bilateral allocable
Right hand scale
Left hand scale
Iceland
2016 2017
Principal objective 2 4
Significant objective 22 16
Not targeted 4 5
Not screened 0 0
Total bilateral allocable aid 29 26
Gender equality focused aid (3) 86% 79%
Memo:
Total non bilateral allocable aid 19 23
Included in principal:
- Aid to Women's equality organisations 1 2
- Ending violence against women 0 0
Contribution to UN Women (multilateral) 1 1
Uganda 4.8 4.8 97%
Malawi 4.0 4.0 100%
Syrian Arab Republic 2.9 2.8 96%
Mozambique 2.9 2.9 98%
Lebanon 0.7 0.7 80%
West Bank and Gaza Strip 0.6 0.6 64%
Afghanistan 0.5 0.5 58%
Ethiopia 0.4 0.4 100%
Belarus 0.3 0.3 100%
Jordan 0.2 0.2 100%
Uganda 4.8 4.6 97%
Malawi 4.0 4.0 100%
Mozambique 2.9 2.8 98%
Syrian Arab Republic 2.8 2.7 96%
Lebanon 0.7 0.6 80%
Ethiopia 0.4 0.4 100%
West Bank and Gaza Strip 0.6 0.4 64%
Afghanistan 0.5 0.3 58%
Belarus 0.3 0.3 100%
Jordan 0.2 0.2 100%
Aid in Support of Gender Equality and Women's Empowerment2016-2017
(1)
An activity can target gender equality as a "principal objective" or "significant objective". Principal means gender equality was an explicit objective of the activity and
fundemental in its design. Significant means gender equality was an important, but secondary, objective of the activity. Not targeted means that the activity was
screened for promoting gender equality, but was not found to have targeted it.
The use of the recommendended minimum criteria for the marker by some members in recent years can result in lower levels of aid reported as focused on gender
equality (2).
All activities have been screened against the gender marker: the gender coverage ratio is thus 100%.
Gender equality focus of donor's aid programme2016 USD million
(1) Amounts are average commitments for 2015-2016, unless otherwise shown
Sector breakdown Top ten recipients
Percentage of gender equality focused aid by sector Gender equality focus in aid to
top ten recipients 2016 USD million
Total aid Total bilateral
allocable aid
Gender
equality
focused aid (3)
Top ten recipients of gender equality
focused aidGender equality focus of sectors
2016 USD million2016 USD million
Total bilateral
allocable aid
Gender equality focused aid
(3)
(2) Handbook on the OECD-DAC Gender Equality Policy Marker 2016
(3) % of bilateral allocable aid excluding activities not screened against the gender equality marker.
Note: Statistics on gender focus exclude bilateral non-allocable aid since several members do not apply the gender marker on these forms of aid. This category
includes programme assistance (e.g. general budget support...), debt relief and in-donor expenses.
Source: (Creditor Reporting System) CRS Aid Activity database at http://oe.cd/oda-gender
020406080
100
Economicinfrastructure
Education
Government and civilsociety
Health
MultisectorOther social
infrastructure
Population andreproductive health
Production
Water and sanitation
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
Education Health andPopulation
Other SocialInfrast., incl.
Women'sequality
EconomicInfrastructure
Production Multisector
Gender equality focused aid Not targeted Not screened
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Significant Principal Gender Eq. focused, %
2016 USD million % of bilateral allocable
Right hand scale
Left hand scale
Ireland
2016 2017
Principal objective 49 63
Significant objective 264 273
Not targeted 60 50
Not screened 19 18
Total bilateral allocable aid 391 404
Gender equality focused aid (3) 84% 87%
Memo:
Total non bilateral allocable aid 36 74
Included in principal:
- Aid to Women's equality organisations 8 6
- Ending violence against women 0 10
Contribution to UN Women (multilateral) 2 2
(*) break in bilateral allocable calculation method in 2010
Ethiopia 39 38 98%
Mozambique 29 28 71%
Uganda 27 25 85%
Tanzania 25 24 95%
Malawi 22 21 95%
Zambia 13 12 96%
Sierra Leone 13 12 75%
South Sudan 11 11 91%
Viet Nam 10 10 57%
Turkey 10 10 13%
Ethiopia 38 36 98%
Tanzania 24 23 95%
Uganda 25 21 85%
Mozambique 28 20 71%
Malawi 21 20 95%
Zambia 12 11 96%
South Sudan 11 9 91%
Sierra Leone 12 9 75%
Democratic Republic of the Congo 9 8 96%
Kenya 8 7 96%
Aid in Support of Gender Equality and Women's Empowerment2016-2017
(1)
An activity can target gender equality as a "principal objective" or "significant objective". Principal means gender equality was an explicit objective of the activity and
fundemental in its design. Significant means gender equality was an important, but secondary, objective of the activity. Not targeted means that the activity was
screened for promoting gender equality, but was not found to have targeted it.
The use of the recommendended minimum criteria for the marker by some members in recent years can result in lower levels of aid reported as focused on gender
equality (2).
Not all activities have been screened against the gender marker: the coverage ratio for bilateral allocable activities is 95%.
Gender equality focus of donor's aid programme2016 USD million
(1) Amounts are average commitments for 2015-2016, unless otherwise shown
Sector breakdown Top ten recipients
Percentage of gender equality focused aid by sector Gender equality focus in aid to
top ten recipients 2016 USD million
Total aid Total bilateral
allocable aid
Gender
equality
focused aid (3)
Top ten recipients of gender equality
focused aidGender equality focus of sectors
2016 USD million2016 USD million
Total bilateral
allocable aid
Gender equality focused aid
(3)
(2) Handbook on the OECD-DAC Gender Equality Policy Marker 2016
(3) % of bilateral allocable aid excluding activities not screened against the gender equality marker.
Note: Statistics on gender focus exclude bilateral non-allocable aid since several members do not apply the gender marker on these forms of aid. This category
includes programme assistance (e.g. general budget support...), debt relief and in-donor expenses.
Source: (Creditor Reporting System) CRS Aid Activity database at http://oe.cd/oda-gender
020406080
100
Economicinfrastructure
Education
Government and civilsociety
Health
MultisectorOther social
infrastructure
Population andreproductive health
Production
Water and sanitation
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
Education Health andPopulation
Other SocialInfrast., incl.
Women'sequality
EconomicInfrastructure
Production Multisector
Gender equality focused aid Not targeted Not screened
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
2008-09 *10-11 12-13 14-15 2016-17
Significant Principal Gender Eq. focused, %
2016 USD million % of bilateral allocable
Right hand scale
Left hand scale
Italy
2016 2017
Principal objective 29 56
Significant objective 211 584
Not targeted 384 480
Not screened 72 324
Total bilateral allocable aid 696 1,445
Gender equality focused aid (3) 38% 57%
Memo:
Total non bilateral allocable aid 1,851 1,907
Included in principal:
- Aid to Women's equality organisations 19 7
- Ending violence against women 0 4
Contribution to UN Women (multilateral) 2 2
(*) break in bilateral allocable calculation method in 2010
Turkey 91 91 15%
Afghanistan 77 76 19%
Argentina 73 25 93%
Iraq 68 68 15%
Mozambique 64 63 89%
Cuba 46 1 53%
Ethiopia 41 41 62%
Lebanon 41 40 32%
Tunisia 40 39 92%
Niger 39 39 18%
Mozambique 63 56 89%
Tunisia 39 36 92%
Ethiopia 41 25 62%
Argentina 25 23 93%
Sudan 22 19 92%
Senegal 21 19 92%
West Bank and Gaza Strip 32 19 59%
Afghanistan 76 14 19%
El Salvador 15 13 88%
Lebanon 40 13 32%
Aid in Support of Gender Equality and Women's Empowerment2016-2017
(1)
An activity can target gender equality as a "principal objective" or "significant objective". Principal means gender equality was an explicit objective of the activity and
fundemental in its design. Significant means gender equality was an important, but secondary, objective of the activity. Not targeted means that the activity was
screened for promoting gender equality, but was not found to have targeted it.
The use of the recommendended minimum criteria for the marker by some members in recent years can result in lower levels of aid reported as focused on gender
equality (2).
Not all activities have been screened against the gender marker: the coverage ratio for bilateral allocable activities is 81%.
Gender equality focus of donor's aid programme2016 USD million
(1) Amounts are average commitments for 2015-2016, unless otherwise shown
Sector breakdown Top ten recipients
Percentage of gender equality focused aid by sector Gender equality focus in aid to
top ten recipients 2016 USD million
Total aid Total bilateral
allocable aid
Gender
equality
focused aid (3)
Top ten recipients of gender equality
focused aidGender equality focus of sectors
2016 USD million2016 USD million
Total bilateral
allocable aid
Gender equality focused aid
(3)
(2) Handbook on the OECD-DAC Gender Equality Policy Marker 2016
(3) % of bilateral allocable aid excluding activities not screened against the gender equality marker.
Note: Statistics on gender focus exclude bilateral non-allocable aid since several members do not apply the gender marker on these forms of aid. This category
includes programme assistance (e.g. general budget support...), debt relief and in-donor expenses.
Source: (Creditor Reporting System) CRS Aid Activity database at http://oe.cd/oda-gender
020406080
100
Economicinfrastructure
Education
Government and civilsociety
Health
MultisectorOther social
infrastructure
Population andreproductive health
Production
Water and sanitation
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
Education Health andPopulation
Other SocialInfrast., incl.
Women'sequality
EconomicInfrastructure
Production Multisector
Gender equality focused aid Not targeted Not screened
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
0
100
200
300
400
500
2008-09 *10-11 12-13 14-15 2016-17
Significant Principal Gender Eq. focused, %
2016 USD million % of bilateral allocable
Right hand scale
Left hand scale
Japan
2016 2017
Principal objective 98 117
Significant objective 6,186 6,085
Not targeted 12,456 11,629
Not screened 966 1,293
Total bilateral allocable aid 19,705 19,124
Gender equality focused aid (3) 34% 35%
Memo:
Total non bilateral allocable aid 1,318 1,735
Included in principal:
- Aid to Women's equality organisations 56 14
- Ending violence against women 5 1
Contribution to UN Women (multilateral) 5 0
(*) break in bilateral allocable calculation method in 2010
India 3,904 3,725 36%
Bangladesh 1,720 1,720 46%
Viet Nam 1,695 1,644 58%
Indonesia 1,036 1,036 84%
Myanmar 837 837 27%
Thailand 805 805 1%
Egypt 757 757 49%
Sri Lanka 634 588 36%
Iraq 545 292 16%
Cambodia 412 412 34%
India 3,725 1,319 36%
Viet Nam 1,644 923 58%
Indonesia 1,036 849 84%
Bangladesh 1,720 786 46%
Egypt 757 363 49%
Myanmar 837 215 27%
Sri Lanka 588 210 36%
Afghanistan 263 162 64%
Cambodia 412 136 34%
Philippines 344 102 33%
Aid in Support of Gender Equality and Women's Empowerment2016-2017
(1)
An activity can target gender equality as a "principal objective" or "significant objective". Principal means gender equality was an explicit objective of the activity and
fundemental in its design. Significant means gender equality was an important, but secondary, objective of the activity. Not targeted means that the activity was
screened for promoting gender equality, but was not found to have targeted it.
The use of the recommendended minimum criteria for the marker by some members in recent years can result in lower levels of aid reported as focused on gender
equality (2).
Not all activities have been screened against the gender marker: the coverage ratio for bilateral allocable activities is 94%.
Gender equality focus of donor's aid programme2016 USD million
(1) Amounts are average commitments for 2015-2016, unless otherwise shown
Sector breakdown Top ten recipients
Percentage of gender equality focused aid by sector Gender equality focus in aid to
top ten recipients 2016 USD million
Total aid Total bilateral
allocable aid
Gender
equality
focused aid (3)
Top ten recipients of gender equality
focused aidGender equality focus of sectors
2016 USD million2016 USD million
Total bilateral
allocable aid
Gender equality focused aid
(3)
(2) Handbook on the OECD-DAC Gender Equality Policy Marker 2016
(3) % of bilateral allocable aid excluding activities not screened against the gender equality marker.
Note: Statistics on gender focus exclude bilateral non-allocable aid since several members do not apply the gender marker on these forms of aid. This category
includes programme assistance (e.g. general budget support...), debt relief and in-donor expenses.
Source: (Creditor Reporting System) CRS Aid Activity database at http://oe.cd/oda-gender
020406080
100
Economicinfrastructure
Education
Government and civilsociety
Health
MultisectorOther social
infrastructure
Population andreproductive health
Production
Water and sanitation
0
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
Education Health andPopulation
Other SocialInfrast., incl.
Women'sequality
EconomicInfrastructure
Production Multisector
Gender equality focused aid Not targeted Not screened
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
7,000
2002-03 04-05 06-07 08-09 *10-11 12-13 14-15 2016-17
Significant Principal Gender Eq. focused, %
2016 USD million % of bilateral allocable
Right hand scale
Left hand scale
Korea
2016 2017
Principal objective 67 43
Significant objective 293 198
Not targeted 1,984 1,988
Not screened 3 0
Total bilateral allocable aid 2,347 2,229
Gender equality focused aid (3) 15% 11%
Memo:
Total non bilateral allocable aid 111 99
Included in principal:
- Aid to Women's equality organisations 4 2
- Ending violence against women 0 3
Contribution to UN Women (multilateral) 4 5
(*) break in bilateral allocable calculation method in 2010
Viet Nam 188 188 1%
Lao People's Democratic Republic 138 138 2%
Egypt 136 136 0%
Uzbekistan 132 132 0%
Sri Lanka 121 121 0%
Myanmar 118 118 0%
Cambodia 110 110 2%
Nicaragua 103 103 23%
Philippines 102 102 3%
Bangladesh 98 98 39%
Senegal 54 41 76%
Bangladesh 98 38 39%
Pakistan 41 38 92%
Nicaragua 103 24 23%
Iraq 28 18 65%
Bolivia 23 17 73%
Solomon Islands 16 15 94%
Ecuador 24 13 55%
Ghana 16 10 64%
Tanzania 63 9 14%
Aid in Support of Gender Equality and Women's Empowerment2016-2017
(1)
An activity can target gender equality as a "principal objective" or "significant objective". Principal means gender equality was an explicit objective of the activity and
fundemental in its design. Significant means gender equality was an important, but secondary, objective of the activity. Not targeted means that the activity was
screened for promoting gender equality, but was not found to have targeted it.
The use of the recommendended minimum criteria for the marker by some members in recent years can result in lower levels of aid reported as focused on gender
equality (2).
All activities have been screened against the gender marker: the gender coverage ratio is thus 100%.
Gender equality focus of donor's aid programme2016 USD million
(1) Amounts are average commitments for 2015-2016, unless otherwise shown
Sector breakdown Top ten recipients
Percentage of gender equality focused aid by sector Gender equality focus in aid to
top ten recipients 2016 USD million
Total aid Total bilateral
allocable aid
Gender
equality
focused aid (3)
Top ten recipients of gender equality
focused aidGender equality focus of sectors
2016 USD million2016 USD million
Total bilateral
allocable aid
Gender equality focused aid
(3)
(2) Handbook on the OECD-DAC Gender Equality Policy Marker 2016
(3) % of bilateral allocable aid excluding activities not screened against the gender equality marker.
Note: Statistics on gender focus exclude bilateral non-allocable aid since several members do not apply the gender marker on these forms of aid. This category
includes programme assistance (e.g. general budget support...), debt relief and in-donor expenses.
Source: (Creditor Reporting System) CRS Aid Activity database at http://oe.cd/oda-gender
020406080
100
Economicinfrastructure
Education
Government and civilsociety
Health
MultisectorOther social
infrastructure
Population andreproductive health
Production
Water and sanitation
0
200
400
600
800
1,000
Education Health andPopulation
Other SocialInfrast., incl.
Women'sequality
EconomicInfrastructure
Production Multisector
Gender equality focused aid Not targeted Not screened
0%
5%
10%
15%
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
2008-09 *10-11 12-13 14-15 2016-17
Significant Principal Gender Eq. focused, %
2016 USD million % of bilateral allocable
Right hand scale
Left hand scale
Luxembourg
2016 2017
Principal objective 27 15
Significant objective 60 63
Not targeted 169 194
Not screened 0 0
Total bilateral allocable aid 255 272
Gender equality focused aid (3) 34% 29%
Memo:
Total non bilateral allocable aid 21 23
Included in principal:
- Aid to Women's equality organisations 0 4
- Ending violence against women 1 1
Contribution to UN Women (multilateral) 1 1
(*) break in bilateral allocable calculation method in 2010
Niger 26 24 80%
Burkina Faso 22 20 57%
Mali 18 17 53%
Senegal 18 16 70%
Lao People's Democratic Republic 15 14 46%
Cabo Verde 10 9 34%
Nicaragua 10 9 76%
West Bank and Gaza Strip 8 8 1%
Kosovo 7 7 25%
Syrian Arab Republic 6 6 3%
Niger 24 19 80%
Burkina Faso 20 11 57%
Senegal 16 11 70%
Mali 17 9 53%
Nicaragua 9 7 76%
Lao People's Democratic Republic 14 6 46%
Viet Nam 5 4 71%
Cabo Verde 9 3 34%
Kosovo 7 2 25%
Democratic Republic of the Congo 3 1 33%
Aid in Support of Gender Equality and Women's Empowerment2016-2017
(1)
An activity can target gender equality as a "principal objective" or "significant objective". Principal means gender equality was an explicit objective of the activity and
fundemental in its design. Significant means gender equality was an important, but secondary, objective of the activity. Not targeted means that the activity was
screened for promoting gender equality, but was not found to have targeted it.
The use of the recommendended minimum criteria for the marker by some members in recent years can result in lower levels of aid reported as focused on gender
equality (2).
All activities have been screened against the gender marker: the gender coverage ratio is thus 100%.
Gender equality focus of donor's aid programme2016 USD million
(1) Amounts are average commitments for 2015-2016, unless otherwise shown
Sector breakdown Top ten recipients
Percentage of gender equality focused aid by sector Gender equality focus in aid to
top ten recipients 2016 USD million
Total aid Total bilateral
allocable aid
Gender
equality
focused aid (3)
Top ten recipients of gender equality
focused aidGender equality focus of sectors
2016 USD million2016 USD million
Total bilateral
allocable aid
Gender equality focused aid
(3)
(2) Handbook on the OECD-DAC Gender Equality Policy Marker 2016
(3) % of bilateral allocable aid excluding activities not screened against the gender equality marker.
Note: Statistics on gender focus exclude bilateral non-allocable aid since several members do not apply the gender marker on these forms of aid. This category
includes programme assistance (e.g. general budget support...), debt relief and in-donor expenses.
Source: (Creditor Reporting System) CRS Aid Activity database at http://oe.cd/oda-gender
020406080
100
Economicinfrastructure
Education
Government and civilsociety
Health
MultisectorOther social
infrastructure
Population andreproductive health
Production
Water and sanitation
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Education Health andPopulation
Other SocialInfrast., incl.
Women'sequality
EconomicInfrastructure
Production Multisector
Gender equality focused aid Not targeted Not screened
0%
20%
40%
60%
0
30
60
90
2008-09 *10-11 12-13 14-15 2016-17
Significant Principal Gender Eq. focused, %
2016 USD million % of bilateral allocable
Right hand scale
Left hand scale
Netherlands
2016 2017
Principal objective 574 237
Significant objective 986 1,099
Not targeted 1,013 768
Not screened 0 0
Total bilateral allocable aid 2,572 2,103
Gender equality focused aid (3) 61% 64%
Memo:
Total non bilateral allocable aid 700 1,262
Included in principal:
- Aid to Women's equality organisations 89 24
- Ending violence against women 0 6
Contribution to UN Women (multilateral) 18 0
(*) break in bilateral allocable calculation method in 2010
Ethiopia 72 72 64%
South Sudan 69 69 56%
Rwanda 69 69 16%
Lebanon 65 65 74%
Benin 65 65 89%
Turkey 55 55 0%
Mozambique 53 53 49%
Afghanistan 52 52 35%
Bangladesh 51 51 73%
Iraq 39 39 33%
Benin 65 58 89%
Lebanon 65 48 74%
Ethiopia 72 46 64%
South Sudan 69 38 56%
Bangladesh 51 37 73%
Yemen 38 36 94%
Syrian Arab Republic 35 29 83%
Jordan 34 28 81%
Mozambique 53 26 49%
Ghana 24 21 84%
Aid in Support of Gender Equality and Women's Empowerment2016-2017
(1)
An activity can target gender equality as a "principal objective" or "significant objective". Principal means gender equality was an explicit objective of the activity and
fundemental in its design. Significant means gender equality was an important, but secondary, objective of the activity. Not targeted means that the activity was
screened for promoting gender equality, but was not found to have targeted it.
The use of the recommendended minimum criteria for the marker by some members in recent years can result in lower levels of aid reported as focused on gender
equality (2).
All activities have been screened against the gender marker: the gender coverage ratio is thus 100%.
Gender equality focus of donor's aid programme2016 USD million
(1) Amounts are average commitments for 2015-2016, unless otherwise shown
Sector breakdown Top ten recipients
Percentage of gender equality focused aid by sector Gender equality focus in aid to
top ten recipients 2016 USD million
Total aid Total bilateral
allocable aid
Gender
equality
focused aid (3)
Top ten recipients of gender equality
focused aidGender equality focus of sectors
2016 USD million2016 USD million
Total bilateral
allocable aid
Gender equality focused aid
(3)
(2) Handbook on the OECD-DAC Gender Equality Policy Marker 2016
(3) % of bilateral allocable aid excluding activities not screened against the gender equality marker.
Note: Statistics on gender focus exclude bilateral non-allocable aid since several members do not apply the gender marker on these forms of aid. This category
includes programme assistance (e.g. general budget support...), debt relief and in-donor expenses.
Source: (Creditor Reporting System) CRS Aid Activity database at http://oe.cd/oda-gender
020406080
100
Economicinfrastructure
Education
Government and civilsociety
Health
MultisectorOther social
infrastructure
Population andreproductive health
Production
Water and sanitation
0
200
400
600
800
Education Health andPopulation
Other SocialInfrast., incl.
Women'sequality
EconomicInfrastructure
Production Multisector
Gender equality focused aid Not targeted Not screened
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
0
300
600
900
1,200
1,500
1,800
2002-03 04-05 06-07 08-09 *10-11 12-13 14-15 2016-17
Significant Principal Gender Eq. focused, %
2016 USD million % of bilateral allocable
Right hand scale
Left hand scale
New Zealand
2016 2017
Principal objective 10 4
Significant objective 159 164
Not targeted 186 185
Not screened 0 0
Total bilateral allocable aid 355 353
Gender equality focused aid (3) 48% 48%
Memo:
Total non bilateral allocable aid 81 84
Included in principal:
- Aid to Women's equality organisations 1 1
- Ending violence against women 0 0
Contribution to UN Women (multilateral) 3 2
(*) break in bilateral allocable calculation method in 2010
Solomon Islands 27 27 64%
Papua New Guinea 25 25 83%
Fiji 23 23 28%
Samoa 21 18 85%
Tokelau 18 10 15%
Kiribati 17 13 40%
Niue 16 9 30%
Cook Islands 13 13 61%
Vanuatu 13 13 49%
Myanmar 12 12 39%
Papua New Guinea 25 20 83%
Solomon Islands 27 17 64%
Samoa 18 16 85%
Timor-Leste 8 8 99%
Cook Islands 13 8 61%
Fiji 23 6 28%
Vanuatu 13 6 49%
Cambodia 6 5 93%
Tonga 8 5 63%
Kiribati 13 5 40%
Aid in Support of Gender Equality and Women's Empowerment2016-2017
(1)
An activity can target gender equality as a "principal objective" or "significant objective". Principal means gender equality was an explicit objective of the activity and
fundemental in its design. Significant means gender equality was an important, but secondary, objective of the activity. Not targeted means that the activity was
screened for promoting gender equality, but was not found to have targeted it.
The use of the recommendended minimum criteria for the marker by some members in recent years can result in lower levels of aid reported as focused on gender
equality (2).
All activities have been screened against the gender marker: the gender coverage ratio is thus 100%.
Gender equality focus of donor's aid programme2016 USD million
(1) Amounts are average commitments for 2015-2016, unless otherwise shown
Sector breakdown Top ten recipients
Percentage of gender equality focused aid by sector Gender equality focus in aid to
top ten recipients 2016 USD million
Total aid Total bilateral
allocable aid
Gender
equality
focused aid (3)
Top ten recipients of gender equality
focused aidGender equality focus of sectors
2016 USD million2016 USD million
Total bilateral
allocable aid
Gender equality focused aid
(3)
(2) Handbook on the OECD-DAC Gender Equality Policy Marker 2016
(3) % of bilateral allocable aid excluding activities not screened against the gender equality marker.
Note: Statistics on gender focus exclude bilateral non-allocable aid since several members do not apply the gender marker on these forms of aid. This category
includes programme assistance (e.g. general budget support...), debt relief and in-donor expenses.
Source: (Creditor Reporting System) CRS Aid Activity database at http://oe.cd/oda-gender
020406080
100
Economicinfrastructure
Education
Government and civilsociety
Health
MultisectorOther social
infrastructure
Population andreproductive health
Production
Water and sanitation
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Education Health andPopulation
Other SocialInfrast., incl.
Women'sequality
EconomicInfrastructure
Production Multisector
Gender equality focused aid Not targeted Not screened
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
0
50
100
150
200
2002-03 04-05 06-07 08-09 *10-11 12-13 14-15 2016-17
Significant Principal Gender Eq. focused, %
2016 USD million % of bilateral allocable
Right hand scale
Left hand scale
Norway
2016 2017
Principal objective 124 96
Significant objective 662 492
Not targeted 1,646 2,131
Not screened 0 0
Total bilateral allocable aid 2,432 2,719
Gender equality focused aid (3) 32% 22%
Memo:
Total non bilateral allocable aid 1,025 378
Included in principal:
- Aid to Women's equality organisations 42 42
- Ending violence against women 33 21
Contribution to UN Women (multilateral) 0 9
(*) break in bilateral allocable calculation method in 2010
Syrian Arab Republic 124 124 21%
Afghanistan 91 89 51%
Ethiopia 87 87 28%
Brazil 86 86 1%
South Sudan 76 76 24%
West Bank and Gaza Strip 74 74 16%
Malawi 62 62 37%
Lebanon 62 62 19%
Colombia 57 57 26%
Somalia 54 54 46%
Afghanistan 89 45 51%
Nepal 35 29 82%
Syrian Arab Republic 124 26 21%
Somalia 54 25 46%
Ethiopia 87 24 28%
Malawi 62 23 37%
South Sudan 76 18 24%
Mali 29 15 54%
Colombia 57 15 26%
Tanzania 28 14 51%
Aid in Support of Gender Equality and Women's Empowerment2016-2017
(1)
An activity can target gender equality as a "principal objective" or "significant objective". Principal means gender equality was an explicit objective of the activity and
fundemental in its design. Significant means gender equality was an important, but secondary, objective of the activity. Not targeted means that the activity was
screened for promoting gender equality, but was not found to have targeted it.
The use of the recommendended minimum criteria for the marker by some members in recent years can result in lower levels of aid reported as focused on gender
equality (2).
All activities have been screened against the gender marker: the gender coverage ratio is thus 100%.
Gender equality focus of donor's aid programme2016 USD million
(1) Amounts are average commitments for 2015-2016, unless otherwise shown
Sector breakdown Top ten recipients
Percentage of gender equality focused aid by sector Gender equality focus in aid to
top ten recipients 2016 USD million
Total aid Total bilateral
allocable aid
Gender
equality
focused aid (3)
Top ten recipients of gender equality
focused aidGender equality focus of sectors
2016 USD million2016 USD million
Total bilateral
allocable aid
Gender equality focused aid
(3)
(2) Handbook on the OECD-DAC Gender Equality Policy Marker 2016
(3) % of bilateral allocable aid excluding activities not screened against the gender equality marker.
Note: Statistics on gender focus exclude bilateral non-allocable aid since several members do not apply the gender marker on these forms of aid. This category
includes programme assistance (e.g. general budget support...), debt relief and in-donor expenses.
Source: (Creditor Reporting System) CRS Aid Activity database at http://oe.cd/oda-gender
020406080
100
Economicinfrastructure
Education
Government and civilsociety
Health
MultisectorOther social
infrastructure
Population andreproductive health
Production
Water and sanitation
0
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
Education Health andPopulation
Other SocialInfrast., incl.
Women'sequality
EconomicInfrastructure
Production Multisector
Gender equality focused aid Not targeted Not screened
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
0
200
400
600
800
2002-03 04-05 06-07 08-09 *10-11 12-13 14-15 2016-17
Significant Principal Gender Eq. focused, %
2016 USD million % of bilateral allocable
Right hand scale
Left hand scale
Poland
2016 2017
Principal objective 1 1
Significant objective 3 2
Not targeted 140 154
Not screened 0 0
Total bilateral allocable aid 144 158
Gender equality focused aid (3) 3% 2%
Memo:
Total non bilateral allocable aid 32 77
Included in principal:
- Aid to Women's equality organisations 0.0 0.1
- Ending violence against women 0.1 0.2
Contribution to UN Women (multilateral) 0.0 0.0
Ukraine 41 13 2%
Belarus 25 14 0%
Ethiopia 25 25 1%
Turkey 23 22 0%
Tanzania 14 14 3%
Syrian Arab Republic 7 7 0%
Kenya 5 5 11%
Angola 3 3 0%
Lebanon 2 2 1%
Iraq 2 2 6%
West Bank and Gaza Strip 1 0.6 53%
Kenya 5 0.6 11%
Tanzania 14 0.5 3%
Ukraine 13 0.3 2%
Ethiopia 25 0.3 1%
Jordan 1 0.2 28%
Georgia 2 0.2 13%
Myanmar 1 0.2 28%
Iraq 2 0.1 6%
Moldova 2 0.1 6%
Aid in Support of Gender Equality and Women's Empowerment2016-2017
(1)
An activity can target gender equality as a "principal objective" or "significant objective". Principal means gender equality was an explicit objective of the activity and
fundemental in its design. Significant means gender equality was an important, but secondary, objective of the activity. Not targeted means that the activity was
screened for promoting gender equality, but was not found to have targeted it.
The use of the recommendended minimum criteria for the marker by some members in recent years can result in lower levels of aid reported as focused on gender
equality (2).
All activities have been screened against the gender marker: the gender coverage ratio is thus 100%.
Gender equality focus of donor's aid programme2016 USD million
(1) Amounts are average commitments for 2015-2016, unless otherwise shown
Sector breakdown Top ten recipients
Percentage of gender equality focused aid by sector Gender equality focus in aid to
top ten recipients 2016 USD million
Total aid Total bilateral
allocable aid
Gender
equality
focused aid (3)
Top ten recipients of gender equality
focused aidGender equality focus of sectors
2016 USD million2016 USD million
Total bilateral
allocable aid
Gender equality focused aid
(3)
(2) Handbook on the OECD-DAC Gender Equality Policy Marker 2016
(3) % of bilateral allocable aid excluding activities not screened against the gender equality marker.
Note: Statistics on gender focus exclude bilateral non-allocable aid since several members do not apply the gender marker on these forms of aid. This category
includes programme assistance (e.g. general budget support...), debt relief and in-donor expenses.
Source: (Creditor Reporting System) CRS Aid Activity database at http://oe.cd/oda-gender
020406080
100
Economicinfrastructure
Education
Government and civilsociety
Health
MultisectorOther social
infrastructure
Population andreproductive health
Production
Water and sanitation
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Education Health andPopulation
Other SocialInfrast., incl.
Women'sequality
EconomicInfrastructure
Production Multisector
Gender equality focused aid Not targeted Not screened
0%
1%
2%
3%
4%
0
1
2
3
4
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Significant Principal Gender Eq. focused, %
2016 USD million % of bilateral allocable
Right hand scale
Left hand scale
Portugal
2016 2017
Principal objective 1 2
Significant objective 34 32
Not targeted 97 78
Not screened 0 0
Total bilateral allocable aid 132 112
Gender equality focused aid (3) 26% 31%
Memo:
Total non bilateral allocable aid 27 29
Included in principal:
- Aid to Women's equality organisations 0.0 0.1
- Ending violence against women 0.0 0.1
Contribution to UN Women (multilateral) 0.0 0.0
(*) break in bilateral allocable calculation method in 2010
Cabo Verde 30 23 8%
Mozambique 24 22 42%
Timor-Leste 15 13 79%
Sao Tome and Principe 13 12 39%
Guinea-Bissau 12 9 46%
Syrian Arab Republic 10 10 0%
Morocco 6 6 0%
Angola 5 4 53%
China (People's Republic of) 5 5 0%
Brazil 3 3 2%
Timor-Leste 13 10 79%
Mozambique 22 9 42%
Sao Tome and Principe 12 4 39%
Guinea-Bissau 9 4 46%
Angola 4 2 53%
Cabo Verde 23 2 8%
Kosovo 0 0.1 100%
Colombia 1 0.1 22%
Georgia 0 0.1 63%
Brazil 3 0.1 2%
Aid in Support of Gender Equality and Women's Empowerment2016-2017
(1)
An activity can target gender equality as a "principal objective" or "significant objective". Principal means gender equality was an explicit objective of the activity and
fundemental in its design. Significant means gender equality was an important, but secondary, objective of the activity. Not targeted means that the activity was
screened for promoting gender equality, but was not found to have targeted it.
The use of the recommendended minimum criteria for the marker by some members in recent years can result in lower levels of aid reported as focused on gender
equality (2).
All activities have been screened against the gender marker: the gender coverage ratio is thus 100%.
Gender equality focus of donor's aid programme2016 USD million
(1) Amounts are average commitments for 2015-2016, unless otherwise shown
Sector breakdown Top ten recipients
Percentage of gender equality focused aid by sector Gender equality focus in aid to
top ten recipients 2016 USD million
Total aid Total bilateral
allocable aid
Gender
equality
focused aid (3)
Top ten recipients of gender equality
focused aidGender equality focus of sectors
2016 USD million2016 USD million
Total bilateral
allocable aid
Gender equality focused aid
(3)
(2) Handbook on the OECD-DAC Gender Equality Policy Marker 2016
(3) % of bilateral allocable aid excluding activities not screened against the gender equality marker.
Note: Statistics on gender focus exclude bilateral non-allocable aid since several members do not apply the gender marker on these forms of aid. This category
includes programme assistance (e.g. general budget support...), debt relief and in-donor expenses.
Source: (Creditor Reporting System) CRS Aid Activity database at http://oe.cd/oda-gender
020406080
100
Economicinfrastructure
Education
Government and civilsociety
Health
MultisectorOther social
infrastructure
Population andreproductive health
Production
Water and sanitation
0
10
20
30
40
50
Education Health andPopulation
Other SocialInfrast., incl.
Women'sequality
EconomicInfrastructure
Production Multisector
Gender equality focused aid Not targeted Not screened
0%
8%
16%
24%
32%
0
10
20
30
40
2002-03 04-05 06-07 08-09 *10-11 12-13 14-15 2016-17
Significant Principal Gender Eq. focused, %
2016 USD million % of bilateral allocable
Right hand scale
Left hand scale
Slovak Republic
2016 2017
Principal objective 0.5 0.2
Significant objective 8 12
Not targeted 15 19
Not screened 1 1
Total bilateral allocable aid 24 33
Gender equality focused aid (3) 35% 39%
Memo:
Total non bilateral allocable aid 4 4
Included in principal:
- Aid to Women's equality organisations 0.0 0.2
- Ending violence against women 0.0 0.0
Contribution to UN Women (multilateral) 0.0 0.1
Turkey 1.7 1.7 100%
Ukraine 1.6 1.6 0%
Kenya 1.4 1.4 17%
Serbia 1.2 1.2 0%
Syrian Arab Republic 0.8 0.8 15%
South Sudan 0.7 0.7 0%
Moldova 0.6 0.6 0%
Afghanistan 0.6 0.6 3%
Georgia 0.5 0.5 11%
Haiti 0.3 0.3 0%
Turkey 1.7 1.7 100%
Kenya 1.4 0.2 17%
Kosovo 0.2 0.1 66%
Syrian Arab Republic 0.8 0.1 15%
Georgia 0.5 0.1 11%
Afghanistan 0.6 0.01 3%
West Bank and Gaza Strip 0.1 0.01 9%
India 0.02 0.003 14%
Aid in Support of Gender Equality and Women's Empowerment2016-2017
(1)
An activity can target gender equality as a "principal objective" or "significant objective". Principal means gender equality was an explicit objective of the activity and
fundemental in its design. Significant means gender equality was an important, but secondary, objective of the activity. Not targeted means that the activity was
screened for promoting gender equality, but was not found to have targeted it.
The use of the recommendended minimum criteria for the marker by some members in recent years can result in lower levels of aid reported as focused on gender
equality (2).
Not all activities have been screened against the gender marker: the coverage ratio for bilateral allocable activities is 96%.
Gender equality focus of donor's aid programme2016 USD million
(1) Amounts are average commitments for 2015-2016, unless otherwise shown
Sector breakdown Top ten recipients
Percentage of gender equality focused aid by sector Gender equality focus in aid to
top ten recipients 2016 USD million
Total aid Total bilateral
allocable aid
Gender
equality
focused aid (3)
Top ten recipients of gender equality
focused aidGender equality focus of sectors
2016 USD million2016 USD million
Total bilateral
allocable aid
Gender equality focused aid
(3)
(2) Handbook on the OECD-DAC Gender Equality Policy Marker 2016
(3) % of bilateral allocable aid excluding activities not screened against the gender equality marker.
Note: Statistics on gender focus exclude bilateral non-allocable aid since several members do not apply the gender marker on these forms of aid. This category
includes programme assistance (e.g. general budget support...), debt relief and in-donor expenses.
Source: (Creditor Reporting System) CRS Aid Activity database at http://oe.cd/oda-gender
020406080
100
Economicinfrastructure
Education
Government and civilsociety
Health
MultisectorOther social
infrastructure
Population andreproductive health
Production
Water and sanitation
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Education Health andPopulation
Other SocialInfrast., incl.
Women'sequality
EconomicInfrastructure
Production Multisector
Gender equality focused aid Not targeted Not screened
0%
9%
18%
27%
36%
45%
0
3
6
9
12
15
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Significant Principal Gender Eq. focused, %
2016 USD million % of bilateral allocable
Right hand scale
Left hand scale
Slovenia
2016 2017
Principal objective 0 1
Significant objective 1 2
Not targeted 4 3
Not screened 9 3
Total bilateral allocable aid 14 9
Gender equality focused aid (3) 18% 51%
Memo:
Total non bilateral allocable aid 17 13
Included in principal:
- Aid to Women's equality organisations 0.0 0.5
- Ending violence against women 0.0 0.0
Contribution to UN Women (multilateral) 0.0 0.0
(*) break in bilateral allocable calculation method in 2010
Bosnia and Herzegovina 3.8 1.1 40%
Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia 3.2 0.4 30%
Turkey 2.8 2.8 0%
Serbia 2.6 1.4 13%
Kosovo 1.5 0.9 69%
Montenegro 1.2 0.9 26%
Albania 0.5 0.5 73%
West Bank and Gaza Strip 0.3 0.3 87%
Ukraine 0.2 0.2 0%
Jordan 0.2 0.2 100%
Kosovo 0.9 0.6 69%
West Bank and Gaza Strip 0.3 0.2 87%
Bosnia and Herzegovina 1.1 0.2 40%
Jordan 0.2 0.2 100%
Albania 0.5 0.1 73%
Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia 0.4 0.1 30%
Lebanon 0.1 0.1 65%
Uganda 0.1 0.1 100%
Montenegro 0.9 0.1 26%
Moldova 0.1 0.1 100%
Aid in Support of Gender Equality and Women's Empowerment2016-2017
(1)
An activity can target gender equality as a "principal objective" or "significant objective". Principal means gender equality was an explicit objective of the activity and
fundemental in its design. Significant means gender equality was an important, but secondary, objective of the activity. Not targeted means that the activity was
screened for promoting gender equality, but was not found to have targeted it.
The use of the recommendended minimum criteria for the marker by some members in recent years can result in lower levels of aid reported as focused on gender
equality (2).
Not all activities have been screened against the gender marker: the coverage ratio for bilateral allocable activities is 45%.
Gender equality focus of donor's aid programme2016 USD million
(1) Amounts are average commitments for 2015-2016, unless otherwise shown
Sector breakdown Top ten recipients
Percentage of gender equality focused aid by sector Gender equality focus in aid to
top ten recipients 2016 USD million
Total aid Total bilateral
allocable aid
Gender
equality
focused aid (3)
Top ten recipients of gender equality
focused aidGender equality focus of sectors
2016 USD million2016 USD million
Total bilateral
allocable aid
Gender equality focused aid
(3)
(2) Handbook on the OECD-DAC Gender Equality Policy Marker 2016
(3) % of bilateral allocable aid excluding activities not screened against the gender equality marker.
Note: Statistics on gender focus exclude bilateral non-allocable aid since several members do not apply the gender marker on these forms of aid. This category
includes programme assistance (e.g. general budget support...), debt relief and in-donor expenses.
Source: (Creditor Reporting System) CRS Aid Activity database at http://oe.cd/oda-gender
020406080
100
Economicinfrastructure
Education
Government and civilsociety
Health
MultisectorOther social
infrastructure
Population andreproductive health
Production
Water and sanitation
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Education Health andPopulation
Other SocialInfrast., incl.
Women'sequality
EconomicInfrastructure
Production Multisector
Gender equality focused aid Not targeted Not screened
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
2010* 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Significant Principal Gender Eq. focused, %
2016 USD million % of bilateral allocable
Right hand scale
Left hand scale
Spain
2016 2017
Principal objective 91 101
Significant objective 150 209
Not targeted 342 327
Not screened 0 0
Total bilateral allocable aid 583 637
Gender equality focused aid (3) 41% 49%
Memo:
Total non bilateral allocable aid 2,350 443
Included in principal:
- Aid to Women's equality organisations 21 29
- Ending violence against women 10 13
Contribution to UN Women (multilateral) 0 1
(*) break in bilateral allocable calculation method in 2010
Cuba 1,062 5 84%
Turkey 144 143 1%
Syrian Arab Republic 60 7 55%
Venezuela 32 1 10%
Morocco 28 23 64%
Côte d'Ivoire 25 1 86%
Colombia 24 17 69%
Ukraine 23 4 0%
West Bank and Gaza Strip 21 15 58%
El Salvador 21 14 89%
Ecuador 20 17 88%
Guatemala 18 16 89%
Morocco 23 15 64%
Peru 17 15 89%
Paraguay 15 14 95%
El Salvador 14 13 89%
Colombia 17 11 69%
Bolivia 13 11 84%
Senegal 11 10 87%
Nicaragua 15 9 64%
Aid in Support of Gender Equality and Women's Empowerment2016-2017
(1)
An activity can target gender equality as a "principal objective" or "significant objective". Principal means gender equality was an explicit objective of the activity and
fundemental in its design. Significant means gender equality was an important, but secondary, objective of the activity. Not targeted means that the activity was
screened for promoting gender equality, but was not found to have targeted it.
The use of the recommendended minimum criteria for the marker by some members in recent years can result in lower levels of aid reported as focused on gender
equality (2).
All activities have been screened against the gender marker: the gender coverage ratio is thus 100%.
Gender equality focus of donor's aid programme2016 USD million
(1) Amounts are average commitments for 2015-2016, unless otherwise shown
Sector breakdown Top ten recipients
Percentage of gender equality focused aid by sector Gender equality focus in aid to
top ten recipients 2016 USD million
Total aid Total bilateral
allocable aid
Gender
equality
focused aid (3)
Top ten recipients of gender equality
focused aidGender equality focus of sectors
2016 USD million2016 USD million
Total bilateral
allocable aid
Gender equality focused aid
(3)
(2) Handbook on the OECD-DAC Gender Equality Policy Marker 2016
(3) % of bilateral allocable aid excluding activities not screened against the gender equality marker.
Note: Statistics on gender focus exclude bilateral non-allocable aid since several members do not apply the gender marker on these forms of aid. This category
includes programme assistance (e.g. general budget support...), debt relief and in-donor expenses.
Source: (Creditor Reporting System) CRS Aid Activity database at http://oe.cd/oda-gender
020406080
100
Economicinfrastructure
Education
Government and civilsociety
Health
MultisectorOther social
infrastructure
Population andreproductive health
Production
Water and sanitation
0
50
100
150
200
250
Education Health andPopulation
Other SocialInfrast., incl.
Women'sequality
EconomicInfrastructure
Production Multisector
Gender equality focused aid Not targeted Not screened
0%
15%
30%
45%
60%
0
200
400
600
800
2006-07 08-09 *10-11 12-13 14-15 2016-17
Significant Principal Gender Eq. focused, %
2016 USD million % of bilateral allocable
Right hand scaleLeft hand scale
Sweden
2016 2017
Principal objective 548 512
Significant objective 1,250 1,650
Not targeted 255 317
Not screened 179 10
Total bilateral allocable aid 2,232 2,489
Gender equality focused aid (3) 88% 87%
Memo:
Total non bilateral allocable aid 1,036 1,010
Included in principal:
- Aid to Women's equality organisations 120 43
- Ending violence against women 0 34
Contribution to UN Women (multilateral) 13 16
(*) break in bilateral allocable calculation method in 2010
Tanzania 179 179 80%
Mozambique 87 87 91%
Ethiopia 80 80 91%
Afghanistan 65 65 80%
Bangladesh 52 52 99%
Somalia 46 46 98%
Democratic Republic of the Congo 46 46 100%
Uganda 46 46 95%
Syrian Arab Republic 43 43 99%
Zimbabwe 38 38 99%
Tanzania 179 143 80%
Mozambique 87 79 91%
Ethiopia 80 73 91%
Afghanistan 65 52 80%
Bangladesh 52 52 99%
Democratic Republic of the Congo 46 46 100%
Somalia 46 44 98%
Uganda 46 44 95%
Syrian Arab Republic 43 42 99%
Zimbabwe 38 37 99%
Aid in Support of Gender Equality and Women's Empowerment2016-2017
(1)
An activity can target gender equality as a "principal objective" or "significant objective". Principal means gender equality was an explicit objective of the activity and
fundemental in its design. Significant means gender equality was an important, but secondary, objective of the activity. Not targeted means that the activity was
screened for promoting gender equality, but was not found to have targeted it.
The use of the recommendended minimum criteria for the marker by some members in recent years can result in lower levels of aid reported as focused on gender
equality (2).
Not all activities have been screened against the gender marker: the coverage ratio for bilateral allocable activities is 96%.
Gender equality focus of donor's aid programme2016 USD million
(1) Amounts are average commitments for 2015-2016, unless otherwise shown
Sector breakdown Top ten recipients
Percentage of gender equality focused aid by sector Gender equality focus in aid to
top ten recipients 2016 USD million
Total aid Total bilateral
allocable aid
Gender
equality
focused aid (3)
Top ten recipients of gender equality
focused aidGender equality focus of sectors
2016 USD million2016 USD million
Total bilateral
allocable aid
Gender equality focused aid
(3)
(2) Handbook on the OECD-DAC Gender Equality Policy Marker 2016
(3) % of bilateral allocable aid excluding activities not screened against the gender equality marker.
Note: Statistics on gender focus exclude bilateral non-allocable aid since several members do not apply the gender marker on these forms of aid. This category
includes programme assistance (e.g. general budget support...), debt relief and in-donor expenses.
Source: (Creditor Reporting System) CRS Aid Activity database at http://oe.cd/oda-gender
020406080
100
Economicinfrastructure
Education
Government and civilsociety
Health
MultisectorOther social
infrastructure
Population andreproductive health
Production
Water and sanitation
0
200
400
600
800
1,000
Education Health andPopulation
Other SocialInfrast., incl.
Women'sequality
EconomicInfrastructure
Production Multisector
Gender equality focused aid Not targeted Not screened
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2002-03 04-05 06-07 08-09 *10-11 12-13 14-15 2016-17
Significant Principal Gender Eq. focused, %
2016 USD million % of bilateral allocable
Right hand scale
Left hand scale
Switzerland
2016 2017
Principal objective 43 91
Significant objective 358 957
Not targeted 1,154 1,005
Not screened 0 290
Total bilateral allocable aid 1,555 2,343
Gender equality focused aid (3) 26% 51%
Memo:
Total non bilateral allocable aid 836 577
Included in principal:
- Aid to Women's equality organisations 5 6
- Ending violence against women 8 11
Contribution to UN Women (multilateral) 0 0
(*) break in bilateral allocable calculation method in 2010
Colombia 46 45 42%
Myanmar 44 42 60%
Niger 37 36 66%
Indonesia 36 36 44%
Burkina Faso 34 17 51%
Afghanistan 33 32 71%
West Bank and Gaza Strip 32 32 38%
Lao People's Democratic Republic 32 31 65%
Bangladesh 31 30 86%
Mozambique 30 29 49%
Myanmar 42 25 60%
Bangladesh 30 25 86%
Niger 36 24 66%
Afghanistan 32 23 71%
Lao People's Democratic Republic 31 20 65%
Kosovo 24 20 84%
Colombia 45 19 42%
Tajikistan 23 17 73%
Ghana 23 16 71%
Indonesia 36 16 44%
Aid in Support of Gender Equality and Women's Empowerment2016-2017
(1)
An activity can target gender equality as a "principal objective" or "significant objective". Principal means gender equality was an explicit objective of the activity and
fundemental in its design. Significant means gender equality was an important, but secondary, objective of the activity. Not targeted means that the activity was
screened for promoting gender equality, but was not found to have targeted it.
The use of the recommendended minimum criteria for the marker by some members in recent years can result in lower levels of aid reported as focused on gender
equality (2).
Not all activities have been screened against the gender marker: the coverage ratio for bilateral allocable activities is 93%.
Gender equality focus of donor's aid programme2016 USD million
(1) Amounts are average commitments for 2015-2016, unless otherwise shown
Sector breakdown Top ten recipients
Percentage of gender equality focused aid by sector Gender equality focus in aid to
top ten recipients 2016 USD million
Total aid Total bilateral
allocable aid
Gender
equality
focused aid (3)
Top ten recipients of gender equality
focused aidGender equality focus of sectors
2016 USD million2016 USD million
Total bilateral
allocable aid
Gender equality focused aid
(3)
(2) Handbook on the OECD-DAC Gender Equality Policy Marker 2016
(3) % of bilateral allocable aid excluding activities not screened against the gender equality marker.
Note: Statistics on gender focus exclude bilateral non-allocable aid since several members do not apply the gender marker on these forms of aid. This category
includes programme assistance (e.g. general budget support...), debt relief and in-donor expenses.
Source: (Creditor Reporting System) CRS Aid Activity database at http://oe.cd/oda-gender
020406080
100
Economicinfrastructure
Education
Government and civilsociety
Health
MultisectorOther social
infrastructure
Population andreproductive health
Production
Water and sanitation
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
Education Health andPopulation
Other SocialInfrast., incl.
Women'sequality
EconomicInfrastructure
Production Multisector
Gender equality focused aid Not targeted Not screened
5%
15%
25%
35%
45%
0
200
400
600
800
2006-07 08-09 *10-11 12-13 14-15 2016-17
Significant Principal Gender Eq. focused, %
2016 USD million % of bilateral allocable
Right hand scale
Left hand scale
United Kingdom
2016 2017
Principal objective 431 209
Significant objective 2,607 2,973
Not targeted 3,645 3,652
Not screened 0 0
Total bilateral allocable aid 6,683 6,833
Gender equality focused aid (3) 45% 47%
Memo:
Total non bilateral allocable aid 629 662
Included in principal:
- Aid to Women's equality organisations 18 36
- Ending violence against women 10 7
Contribution to UN Women (multilateral) 0 17
(*) break in bilateral allocable calculation method in 2010
Pakistan 352 350 81%
Syrian Arab Republic 302 174 46%
Ethiopia 264 264 61%
Somalia 219 217 94%
South Sudan 207 207 20%
Uganda 173 173 56%
Nigeria 169 169 83%
Tanzania 166 166 69%
Afghanistan 148 147 18%
Yemen 123 123 73%
Pakistan 350 284 81%
Somalia 217 205 94%
Ethiopia 264 161 61%
Nigeria 169 140 83%
Tanzania 166 115 69%
Uganda 173 97 56%
Yemen 123 90 73%
Bangladesh 97 87 89%
Syrian Arab Republic 174 80 46%
Rwanda 65 57 88%
Aid in Support of Gender Equality and Women's Empowerment2016-2017
(1)
An activity can target gender equality as a "principal objective" or "significant objective". Principal means gender equality was an explicit objective of the activity and
fundemental in its design. Significant means gender equality was an important, but secondary, objective of the activity. Not targeted means that the activity was
screened for promoting gender equality, but was not found to have targeted it.
The use of the recommendended minimum criteria for the marker by some members in recent years can result in lower levels of aid reported as focused on gender
equality (2).
All activities have been screened against the gender marker: the gender coverage ratio is thus 100%.
Gender equality focus of donor's aid programme2016 USD million
(1) Amounts are average commitments for 2015-2016, unless otherwise shown
Sector breakdown Top ten recipients
Percentage of gender equality focused aid by sector Gender equality focus in aid to
top ten recipients 2016 USD million
Total aid Total bilateral
allocable aid
Gender
equality
focused aid (3)
Top ten recipients of gender equality
focused aidGender equality focus of sectors
2016 USD million2016 USD million
Total bilateral
allocable aid
Gender equality focused aid
(3)
(2) Handbook on the OECD-DAC Gender Equality Policy Marker 2016
(3) % of bilateral allocable aid excluding activities not screened against the gender equality marker.
Note: Statistics on gender focus exclude bilateral non-allocable aid since several members do not apply the gender marker on these forms of aid. This category
includes programme assistance (e.g. general budget support...), debt relief and in-donor expenses.
Source: (Creditor Reporting System) CRS Aid Activity database at http://oe.cd/oda-gender
020406080
100
Economicinfrastructure
Education
Government and civilsociety
Health
MultisectorOther social
infrastructure
Population andreproductive health
Production
Water and sanitation
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
Education Health andPopulation
Other SocialInfrast., incl.
Women'sequality
EconomicInfrastructure
Production Multisector
Gender equality focused aid Not targeted Not screened
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
2002-03 04-05 06-07 08-09 *10-11 12-13 14-15 2016-17
Significant Principal Gender Eq. focused, %
2016 USD million % of bilateral allocable
Right hand scale
Left hand scale
United States
2016 2017
Principal objective 1,761 1,243
Significant objective 4,821 4,392
Not targeted 21,004 21,238
Not screened 0 0
Total bilateral allocable aid 27,586 26,873
Gender equality focused aid (3) 24% 21%
Memo:
Total non bilateral allocable aid 3,528 3,643
Included in principal:
- Aid to Women's equality organisations 4 4
- Ending violence against women 0 1
Contribution to UN Women (multilateral) 8 9
Afghanistan 1,190 1,119 46%
Ethiopia 1,049 1,032 26%
Jordan 987 978 14%
Syrian Arab Republic 956 954 1%
Kenya 931 920 22%
South Sudan 769 756 15%
Nigeria 755 744 20%
Uganda 679 666 22%
Iraq 646 633 4%
Pakistan 612 578 30%
Afghanistan 1,119 518 46%
Ethiopia 1,032 265 26%
Tanzania 601 222 37%
Kenya 920 205 22%
Pakistan 578 171 30%
Democratic Republic of the Congo 471 154 33%
Nigeria 744 146 20%
Uganda 666 146 22%
Jordan 978 140 14%
Ghana 436 129 29%
Aid in Support of Gender Equality and Women's Empowerment2016-2017
(1)
An activity can target gender equality as a "principal objective" or "significant objective". Principal means gender equality was an explicit objective of the activity and
fundemental in its design. Significant means gender equality was an important, but secondary, objective of the activity. Not targeted means that the activity was
screened for promoting gender equality, but was not found to have targeted it.
The use of the recommendended minimum criteria for the marker by some members in recent years can result in lower levels of aid reported as focused on gender
equality (2).
All activities have been screened against the gender marker: the gender coverage ratio is thus 100%.
Gender equality focus of donor's aid programme2016 USD million
(1) Amounts are average commitments for 2015-2016, unless otherwise shown
Sector breakdown Top ten recipients
Percentage of gender equality focused aid by sector Gender equality focus in aid to
top ten recipients 2016 USD million
Total aid Total bilateral
allocable aid
Gender
equality
focused aid (3)
Top ten recipients of gender equality
focused aidGender equality focus of sectors
2016 USD million2016 USD million
Total bilateral
allocable aid
Gender equality focused aid
(3)
(2) Handbook on the OECD-DAC Gender Equality Policy Marker 2016
(3) % of bilateral allocable aid excluding activities not screened against the gender equality marker.
Note: Statistics on gender focus exclude bilateral non-allocable aid since several members do not apply the gender marker on these forms of aid. This category
includes programme assistance (e.g. general budget support...), debt relief and in-donor expenses.
Source: (Creditor Reporting System) CRS Aid Activity database at http://oe.cd/oda-gender
020406080
100
Economicinfrastructure
Education
Government and civilsociety
Health
MultisectorOther social
infrastructure
Population andreproductive health
Production
Water and sanitation
0
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
Education Health andPopulation
Other SocialInfrast., incl.
Women'sequality
EconomicInfrastructure
Production Multisector
Gender equality focused aid Not targeted Not screened
0%
4%
8%
12%
16%
20%
24%
28%
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
7,000
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Significant Principal Gender Eq. focused, %
2016 USD million % of bilateral allocable
Right hand scale
Left hand scale
OECD-DAC Secretariat http://oe.cd/oda-gender
