International Development Evaluation: Comparing DAC and Non-DAC Approaches

47

description

 

Transcript of International Development Evaluation: Comparing DAC and Non-DAC Approaches

Page 1: International Development Evaluation: Comparing DAC and Non-DAC Approaches
Page 2: International Development Evaluation: Comparing DAC and Non-DAC Approaches
Page 3: International Development Evaluation: Comparing DAC and Non-DAC Approaches
Page 4: International Development Evaluation: Comparing DAC and Non-DAC Approaches
Page 5: International Development Evaluation: Comparing DAC and Non-DAC Approaches
Page 7: International Development Evaluation: Comparing DAC and Non-DAC Approaches
Page 8: International Development Evaluation: Comparing DAC and Non-DAC Approaches
Page 9: International Development Evaluation: Comparing DAC and Non-DAC Approaches
Page 10: International Development Evaluation: Comparing DAC and Non-DAC Approaches
Page 12: International Development Evaluation: Comparing DAC and Non-DAC Approaches
Page 13: International Development Evaluation: Comparing DAC and Non-DAC Approaches
Page 14: International Development Evaluation: Comparing DAC and Non-DAC Approaches
Page 15: International Development Evaluation: Comparing DAC and Non-DAC Approaches

Health17%

Agriculture23%

Other22%

Education13%

Environment7%

Public Security7%

Public Administration

5%

Energy3%

Social Development

3%

Industry0.2%

Page 16: International Development Evaluation: Comparing DAC and Non-DAC Approaches
Page 17: International Development Evaluation: Comparing DAC and Non-DAC Approaches
Page 18: International Development Evaluation: Comparing DAC and Non-DAC Approaches
Page 19: International Development Evaluation: Comparing DAC and Non-DAC Approaches
Page 22: International Development Evaluation: Comparing DAC and Non-DAC Approaches
Page 24: International Development Evaluation: Comparing DAC and Non-DAC Approaches
Page 25: International Development Evaluation: Comparing DAC and Non-DAC Approaches

Inter-national

orgs 65%

Con-cessional and non-

concessional loans 26%

Technical-scientific

cooperation 7%

Educational-cultural

cooperation 2%

Humani-tarian aid

0.2%

Page 26: International Development Evaluation: Comparing DAC and Non-DAC Approaches
Page 27: International Development Evaluation: Comparing DAC and Non-DAC Approaches
Page 28: International Development Evaluation: Comparing DAC and Non-DAC Approaches
Page 29: International Development Evaluation: Comparing DAC and Non-DAC Approaches
Page 30: International Development Evaluation: Comparing DAC and Non-DAC Approaches
Page 31: International Development Evaluation: Comparing DAC and Non-DAC Approaches

21 Source: JICA, Evaluation Department. (2010). New JICA Guidelines for Project Evaluation, First Edition.

Page 32: International Development Evaluation: Comparing DAC and Non-DAC Approaches
Page 33: International Development Evaluation: Comparing DAC and Non-DAC Approaches
Page 34: International Development Evaluation: Comparing DAC and Non-DAC Approaches
Page 35: International Development Evaluation: Comparing DAC and Non-DAC Approaches
Page 36: International Development Evaluation: Comparing DAC and Non-DAC Approaches
Page 37: International Development Evaluation: Comparing DAC and Non-DAC Approaches
Page 39: International Development Evaluation: Comparing DAC and Non-DAC Approaches
Page 40: International Development Evaluation: Comparing DAC and Non-DAC Approaches
Page 41: International Development Evaluation: Comparing DAC and Non-DAC Approaches
Page 42: International Development Evaluation: Comparing DAC and Non-DAC Approaches
Page 43: International Development Evaluation: Comparing DAC and Non-DAC Approaches
Page 44: International Development Evaluation: Comparing DAC and Non-DAC Approaches
Page 45: International Development Evaluation: Comparing DAC and Non-DAC Approaches
Page 46: International Development Evaluation: Comparing DAC and Non-DAC Approaches
Page 47: International Development Evaluation: Comparing DAC and Non-DAC Approaches