8/10/2019 Doh- Pes Peer Rating

1/2

INSTRUCTIONS

1.

This form is used for evaluating the performance of your peer

in this rating period. Please use pen or ballpen when

accomplishing this

2.

Please observe fairness and objectivity when rating your peer.

3.

In rating your peer, please encircle the box that most

objectively describes his/her attitude and behavior in the

performance of his/her functions. Where 10 is Outstanding, 8 is

Very Satisfactory, 6, is Satisfactory, 4 is Unsatisfactory, 2 is

Poor.

4. After accomplishing this form, please affix your signature and

submit this to your immediate supervisor.

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

FACTORS TO BE RATED

1. Courtesy Peers behavior to be polite, kind manner of

speech and actuation and relations with your and other

publics.

Always goes all the way to make people comfortable

and satisfied even under pressure and occupied with

work; very effective in dealing with people.

Frequently goes out of the way even under pressure and

occupied with work; generally courteous and accommodating.

Usually goes out of the way to assist the public; able to deal

with public and peer although need some advise at times.

Occasionally assist the public; at times discourteous;

shows lack of patience in dealing with people.

Oftentimes discourteous and irritable; regularly

complained due to inconsiderate attitude.

2. Human Relationspeers integrated concern for people at

work, office clientele, and supervisor-subordinate relationship

into work situations.

Very effective in dealing with public. G ets along easily with

other members of the workforce. Has cordial relationship

with subordinates and peers.

Can be relied upon to deal with the public, and is generally

courteous and accommodating.

Has the ability to deal pleasantly with the public, subordinates

and peers.

Has some difficulty in dealing with the public, occasionally

discourteous except when attending to important or influential

persons.

Has considerable difficulty in dealing with the public. Draws

negative reactions. Often discourteous and irritable.

3. Integrity -Peers adherence to the Code of Conduct & Ethical

Standards and values. Demonstrated ability in the adherence

to a code of moral conduct and values.

Always righteous, upright and can be trusted on any matter;

always straight, uncompromising and incorruptible in his dailydealings.

Consistently sincere in his/her dealings with others; free from

fraud and deception.

Fair and just in dealing with self and others; since in purpose

and deed and unpretentious most of the time.

Insincere, not trustworthy in carrying out duties and

responsibilities; allows him to be used by others in situations,

which may lead to fraud and deception.

Dishonest in any transaction and dealing with others

4.

Stress Tolerance

Peers demonstrated ability ofperformance under pressure or opposition.

Always calm and shows pleasant disposition; consistently

confident and positive even during stressful conditions at work;

never loses patience and never allows tension and anxiety to

affect workplace (performance in workplace)

Most of the time calm, confident and positive; occasionally

loses emotional control during stressful conditions.

Normally calm, confident and positive; occasionally loses

emotional control during stressful conditions.

Often loses emotional control in dealing with stressful work

situations; often complains about people and situations atwork.

Cannot handle stress, highly emotional and into violent

arguments with others.

5. Initiative and Resourcefulness Peers demonstrated ability

to start action, project and performance assigned tasks.

Highly creative with new ideas and suggestions that r

increased effectiveness, efficiency and productivity; h

ideal outlook and concern to the work and can perfec

problems own initiative, attentive to work, usually ov

extra ordinary problems.

Resourceful in doing his own job more efficiently, effe

and productively; takes own initiative, attentive to wo

usually overcomes extra ordinary problems.

Average attitude and interest in his work; performs a

to his job descriptions and responsibilities fairly comp

handle ordinary problems.

Hardly performs his job d escription and responsibiliti

only after consistent prodding.

Requires very close coordination; rarely meets deadli

to find ways out of any difficulties.

6. Compliance to office rules and regulations

observance and adherence to existing office poli

Always complies to office rules and reminds others to

them

Generally complies to office rules with minimal

.reminders

Occasionally lax in observing office rules and re

Regularly reminded of existing office rules and r

Ignores and violates office rules and regulations

7. Punctuality and AttendancePeers observed

of coming to office on time as to be present at

complete assigned responsibilities.

Always within the working area of place of work

Mostly within the working area or place of work

Often times within the working area or place of

Rarely within the working area or place of work

Always not within the working area or place of w

10

8

6

4

2

10

8

6

4

2

10

8

6

4

2

10

8

6

4

2

10

8

6

4

2

10

8

6

4

2

10

8

6

4

2

8/10/2019 Doh- Pes Peer Rating

2/2

8. Leadership Peers demonstrated ability to influence,

motivate and develop confidence to work as a team

and accomplish assigned task, leading the

organizational unit to achieve his/her goal and

objectives enthusiastically.

Leads subordinates exceptionally well; easily achieves high

productivity through teamwork; maintains a good balance of

task and people concern.

Leads subordinate effectively; often gets job done through

teamwork.

Leads subordinates adequately well; usually gets job done.

Seldom exercise leadership over subordinates; seldom gets job

done on time.

Cannot lead subordinates; no teamwork; productivity low; no

balance of task and people concerns.

9. Judgment/decision makingPeers demonstrated ability to

analyze data, identify issues and problems, make conclusions

based on factual information.

Has superior ability in data analysis and always arrives at

excellent decisions even on complex problems.

Often make very good and sound decisions based on relevant

information and good data analysis.

Analysis of data and problems normally adequate. Generally

arrives at correct decisions on routine concerns.

Sometimes make bad decisions because of inadequate.

Generally arrives at correct decisions on routine analysis.

Decisions made are often bad because of poor analysis and

judgment; usually refuses to make decision.

COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS:

_________________________________

NAME AND SIGNATUE OF RATER

_________________________________________

POSITION

_____________________________________

OFFICE/DIVISION

_____________________________

DATE

DOH- PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SYS

(DOH-PES)

PEER RATER FORM

Sept. 12Dec. 31, 2011

________________________________

RATING PERIOD

GLADYS D. BULADACO

_________________________________

NAME OF THE PEER TO BE RATED

FHSIS Data Processor/Encoder

_________________________________POSITION

ARD/ Statistics/ FHSIS Unit

CHD- Caraga

_________________________________

OFFICE

Note: Factors No. 7 and 8 for Supervisors onl

PLEASE READ THE INSTRUCTIONS CAREFULLY

BEFORE ACCOMPLISHING THIS FORM

10

8

6

4

2

10

8

6

4

2