Ralf M. Schnell Technical Evangelist Microsoft Deutschland GmbH.
DocMD: Eric H. Schnell ([email protected]) Associate Professor Prior Health Sciences Library The...
-
Upload
ashlee-wright -
Category
Documents
-
view
215 -
download
0
Transcript of DocMD: Eric H. Schnell ([email protected]) Associate Professor Prior Health Sciences Library The...
docMD:
Eric H. Schnell ([email protected])
Associate Professor
Prior Health Sciences Library
The Ohio State University
Bringing Electronic Document Delivery to Small Hospital Libraries
docMD is funded through support by the National Network of Libraries of Medicine, Greater Midwest Region.
docMD Goal
“ To establish an electronic document delivery service for hospital libraries that are unable to support such a service themselves due to limited human, financial, or technical resources “
docMD Objectives
Establish a mediated direct-to-customer document delivery service for hospital libraries
Identify the costs involved in providing such a service
Develop a model for use by other resource libraries in other regions of the country
Geography
What is IDD?
Internet Document Delivery
Library to library (Odyssey / Ariel)
Library to library to customer (patron delivery)
Lending library to requesting customer (future)
Why IDD / docMD?
Reduces telecom costs (Landes ’97)
Reduces turnaround time13.76 days (Budd ‘86)
reduced to 2.52 days (Sellen ‘99)
Reduces supply costs(Weible ’02)
Barriers to IDD Implementation
Firewalls (McKnight 2001)
communication ports
network authority
Workflow / staffing (Jackson 1993)
Access to technical staff
Fiscal resources
How docMD Jumps these Barriers
Firewalls a common communication port is used (80)
Workflow / staffing ILL processing remains the same Less physical processing of documents
Access to technical staff Technical staff at mediation center Little site support needed
Fiscal resources NLM / GMR supported
Traditional ILL/IDD Customer
Processing Model
Local Library
Customer
OCLC / DOCLINE
Lending “A” Lending “B”
Scans/Sends though IDD Scans/Sends though IDD
IDD
Web Server
docMD Delivery Model
Scans/Sends though IDD Scans/Sends though IDD
Local Library
Customer
OCLC /DOCLINE
Lending “A” Lending “B”
docMD
Web Server
Email with docID#
Email Alert
docMD Statistics (as of Aug 5, ‘05)
490 registered customers
4750 documents processed
<1% required reposting
<1% alternative distribution
<1% posting failures
~15% have gone unviewed
>40% sent to the librarian
docMD Statistics
Average document processing time: 1 minute
Average number of documents requiring follow up: 1 per week
Number of customers contacting docMD central regarding difficulty in
downloading: 4
Turnaround Time
Pre – docMD: 6.53 days (max 19 days)
Post – docMD: 3.52 days (max 11)
46% reduction
Feedback
“Our docs are always so delighted when personalized mail arrives for them.” one has a “raft of administrators tooling past his office wanting to know how his articles were retrieved electronically. They believe that he magically pulled them up all by himself. “
Issues:
Geography: Project leaders / librarian face-to-face contact difficult
Geography II: Difficult if not impossible to organize group training
Geography III: Email helps. Phone is more effective but more time consuming
Issues:
How docMD is implemented at a site is dependent on the hospital librarian
Level of participation is dependent on the marketing performed by the hospital librarians
Too much hand-holding or separation anxiety?
Issues: Funding
Pay-to-Play Hospitals pays a fee based on the number of
documents or per document fee schedule.
Subsidized Each NNLM region establishes funding
opportunities for resource libraries to support a docMD service for their resource area.
Benevolent Any library can provide the service but
supports it using their individual operating funds and can pursue reimbursement from the participants.