Doc 267-2 - Example legal fees audit by Stuart, Maue, Mitchell & James legal fees auditing firm...

153
MBD 001 Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 267-2 Filed 01/31/2008 Page 1 of 153

description

Doc 267-2 - Example legal fees audit by Stuart, Maue, Mitchell & James legal fees auditing firm. I am also uploading Doc 271 - Thomas Counteraffidavit, the rebuttal (which I wrote) showing the significant methodological errors.

Transcript of Doc 267-2 - Example legal fees audit by Stuart, Maue, Mitchell & James legal fees auditing firm...

Page 1: Doc 267-2 - Example legal fees audit by Stuart, Maue, Mitchell & James legal fees auditing firm (rebuttal also uploaded)

MBD 001

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 267-2 Filed 01/31/2008 Page 1 of 153

richard_aubin
Text Box
DEFENDANTS' EXHIBIT 1
Page 2: Doc 267-2 - Example legal fees audit by Stuart, Maue, Mitchell & James legal fees auditing firm (rebuttal also uploaded)

MBD 002

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 267-2 Filed 01/31/2008 Page 2 of 153

Page 3: Doc 267-2 - Example legal fees audit by Stuart, Maue, Mitchell & James legal fees auditing firm (rebuttal also uploaded)

MBD 003

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 267-2 Filed 01/31/2008 Page 3 of 153

Page 4: Doc 267-2 - Example legal fees audit by Stuart, Maue, Mitchell & James legal fees auditing firm (rebuttal also uploaded)

MBD 004

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 267-2 Filed 01/31/2008 Page 4 of 153

Page 5: Doc 267-2 - Example legal fees audit by Stuart, Maue, Mitchell & James legal fees auditing firm (rebuttal also uploaded)

MBD 005

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 267-2 Filed 01/31/2008 Page 5 of 153

Page 6: Doc 267-2 - Example legal fees audit by Stuart, Maue, Mitchell & James legal fees auditing firm (rebuttal also uploaded)

MBD 006

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 267-2 Filed 01/31/2008 Page 6 of 153

Page 7: Doc 267-2 - Example legal fees audit by Stuart, Maue, Mitchell & James legal fees auditing firm (rebuttal also uploaded)

MBD 007

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 267-2 Filed 01/31/2008 Page 7 of 153

Page 8: Doc 267-2 - Example legal fees audit by Stuart, Maue, Mitchell & James legal fees auditing firm (rebuttal also uploaded)

MBD 008

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 267-2 Filed 01/31/2008 Page 8 of 153

Page 9: Doc 267-2 - Example legal fees audit by Stuart, Maue, Mitchell & James legal fees auditing firm (rebuttal also uploaded)

MBD 009

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 267-2 Filed 01/31/2008 Page 9 of 153

Page 10: Doc 267-2 - Example legal fees audit by Stuart, Maue, Mitchell & James legal fees auditing firm (rebuttal also uploaded)

MBD 010

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 267-2 Filed 01/31/2008 Page 10 of 153

Page 11: Doc 267-2 - Example legal fees audit by Stuart, Maue, Mitchell & James legal fees auditing firm (rebuttal also uploaded)

MBD 011

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 267-2 Filed 01/31/2008 Page 11 of 153

Page 12: Doc 267-2 - Example legal fees audit by Stuart, Maue, Mitchell & James legal fees auditing firm (rebuttal also uploaded)

MBD 012

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 267-2 Filed 01/31/2008 Page 12 of 153

Page 13: Doc 267-2 - Example legal fees audit by Stuart, Maue, Mitchell & James legal fees auditing firm (rebuttal also uploaded)

MBD 013

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 267-2 Filed 01/31/2008 Page 13 of 153

Page 14: Doc 267-2 - Example legal fees audit by Stuart, Maue, Mitchell & James legal fees auditing firm (rebuttal also uploaded)

MBD 014

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 267-2 Filed 01/31/2008 Page 14 of 153

Page 15: Doc 267-2 - Example legal fees audit by Stuart, Maue, Mitchell & James legal fees auditing firm (rebuttal also uploaded)

MBD 015

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 267-2 Filed 01/31/2008 Page 15 of 153

Page 16: Doc 267-2 - Example legal fees audit by Stuart, Maue, Mitchell & James legal fees auditing firm (rebuttal also uploaded)

MBD 016

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 267-2 Filed 01/31/2008 Page 16 of 153

Page 17: Doc 267-2 - Example legal fees audit by Stuart, Maue, Mitchell & James legal fees auditing firm (rebuttal also uploaded)

MBD 017

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 267-2 Filed 01/31/2008 Page 17 of 153

Page 18: Doc 267-2 - Example legal fees audit by Stuart, Maue, Mitchell & James legal fees auditing firm (rebuttal also uploaded)

MBD 018

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 267-2 Filed 01/31/2008 Page 18 of 153

Page 19: Doc 267-2 - Example legal fees audit by Stuart, Maue, Mitchell & James legal fees auditing firm (rebuttal also uploaded)

MBD 019

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 267-2 Filed 01/31/2008 Page 19 of 153

Page 20: Doc 267-2 - Example legal fees audit by Stuart, Maue, Mitchell & James legal fees auditing firm (rebuttal also uploaded)

MBD 020

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 267-2 Filed 01/31/2008 Page 20 of 153

Page 21: Doc 267-2 - Example legal fees audit by Stuart, Maue, Mitchell & James legal fees auditing firm (rebuttal also uploaded)

Manziel Law OfficesENTRIES WITH DATE RANGES/MULTIPLE DATES

EXHIBIT A

STUART MAUE

EXHIBIT A PAGE 1 of 3

AssistantAttorneyManziel, L

HOURS FEESTIMEKEEPER

5.25 22.00 0.75

393.75 5,500.00

187.50

28.00 $6,081.25

COMBINED COMBINED

MBD 021

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 267-2 Filed 01/31/2008 Page 21 of 153

Page 22: Doc 267-2 - Example legal fees audit by Stuart, Maue, Mitchell & James legal fees auditing firm (rebuttal also uploaded)

Manziel Law OfficesENTRIES WITH DATE RANGES/MULTIPLE DATES

EXHIBIT A

~ See the last page of exhibit for explanation

STUART MAUE

EXHIBIT A PAGE 2 of 3

28.00 $6,081.25

06/12/07

06/12/07

12/21/07

01/03/08

01/07/08

DATE

Assistant

Attorney

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

NAME

5.25

22.00

0.25

0.25

0.25

ENTRY

5.25

22.00

0.25

0.25

0.25

COMBINED

393.75

5,500.00

62.50

62.50

62.50

COMBINED

01

01

01

01

01

1010

1009

1013

1018

1020

Total

1

1

1

1

1

6/12/2007 THROUGH 1/11/2008 - PREPARATION OF MOTION AND BRIEF FOR ATTORNEY FEES AND AFFIDAVIT AND EXHIBIT IN SUPPORTTHEREOF

6/12/2007 THROUGH 1/11/2008 - PREPARATION OF MOTION AND BRIEF FOR ATTORNEY FEES AND AFFIDAVIT AND EXHIBIT IN SUPPORTTHEREOF

12/21/2007 - LAM EMAIL TO AUBIN RE: CONFER RE: ATTORNEY FEES; 12/26/2007 - LAM DISCUSSION W/AUBIN RE: CONFER RE:ATTORNEY FEES AND

1/3/2008 - LAM EMAIL TO AUBIN RE: CONFER RE: ATTORNEY FEES; 1/4/2008 - LAM S/W AUBIN RE: MOTION FOR ATTORNEY FEES;1/7/2008 - LAM

1/7/2008 - LAM REV. EMAIL FROM AUBIN RE: STIPULATING AS TO AMOUNT ON ATTORNEY FEES; 1/9/2008 - LAM S/W AUBIN RE:STIPULATING AS TO

OTHER TASK~

/

/

/

/

/

Tue

Tue

Fri

Thu

Mon

DESCRIPTION

INFORMATIONAL

HOURS HOURS HOURSFEES EXH.

Number of Entries: 5

MBD 022

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 267-2 Filed 01/31/2008 Page 22 of 153

Page 23: Doc 267-2 - Example legal fees audit by Stuart, Maue, Mitchell & James legal fees auditing firm (rebuttal also uploaded)

Manziel Law OfficesENTRIES WITH DATE RANGES/MULTIPLE DATES

EXHIBIT A

STUART MAUE

EXHIBIT A PAGE 3 of 3

AssistantAttorneyManziel, L

TIMEKEEPER HOURS FEES HOURS FEES HOURS FEES HOURS FEES HOURS FEESISOLATED BLOCKED MAXIMUM PROPORTIONAL COMBINED

(~) REASONS FOR TASK HOUR ASSIGNMENTS

28.00 $6,081.25 0.00 $0.00 28.00 $6,081.25 0.00 $0.00 28.00 $6,081.25

5.25 22.00 0.75

393.75 5,500.00

187.50

0.00 0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00 0.00

5.25 22.00 0.75

393.75 5,500.00

187.50

0.00 0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00 0.00

5.25 22.00 0.75

393.75 5,500.00

187.50

RANGE OF HOURS

RANGE OF FEES

SUMMARY OF HOURS AND FEES BY INDIVIDUAL

MBD 023

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 267-2 Filed 01/31/2008 Page 23 of 153

Page 24: Doc 267-2 - Example legal fees audit by Stuart, Maue, Mitchell & James legal fees auditing firm (rebuttal also uploaded)

Manziel Law OfficesIMPOSSIBLE LONG BILLING DAYS

EXHIBIT B

STUART MAUE

EXHIBIT B PAGE 1 of 7

AssistantAttorneyManziel, LReinckens, J

HOURS FEESTIMEKEEPER

144.50 981.05

2.25 0.25

10,837.50 245,262.50

562.50 62.50

1,128.05 $256,725.00

COMBINED COMBINED

MBD 024

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 267-2 Filed 01/31/2008 Page 24 of 153

Page 25: Doc 267-2 - Example legal fees audit by Stuart, Maue, Mitchell & James legal fees auditing firm (rebuttal also uploaded)

Manziel Law OfficesIMPOSSIBLE LONG BILLING DAYS

EXHIBIT B

~ See the last page of exhibit for explanation

STUART MAUE

EXHIBIT B PAGE 2 of 7

03/06/03

03/06/03

03/06/03

03/06/03

03/06/03

03/06/03

03/28/03

03/28/03

03/28/03

03/28/03

03/29/04

03/29/04

03/29/04

03/29/04

09/13/04

09/13/04

09/13/04

09/13/04

DATE

Assistant

Assistant

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Assistant

Assistant

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Manziel, L

Assistant

Assistant

Attorney

Attorney

NAME

25.50

38.00

82.50

79.50

0.15

1.50

5.00

10.00

67.00

72.50

1.50

32.00

0.25

0.25

45.00

21.00

86.00

21.00

ENTRY

25.50

38.00

82.50

79.50

0.15

1.50

5.00

10.00

67.00

72.50

1.50

32.00

0.25

0.25

45.00

21.00

86.00

21.00

COMBINED

1,912.50

2,850.00

20,625.00

19,875.00

37.50

375.00

375.00

750.00

16,750.00

18,125.00

375.00

8,000.00

62.50

62.50

3,375.00

1,575.00

21,500.00

5,250.00

COMBINED

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

02

02

02

02

501

503

500

502

504

505

516

518

515

517

600

602

604

605

70

90

60

80

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

RESEARCH AND PREPARATION OF HARRIS MSJ #1 AGAINST SALES [DOC# 083]

RESEARCH AND PREPARATION OF HARRIS BRIEF AND APPENDIX SUPPORTING MSJ #1 [DOC# 084]

RESEARCH AND PREPARATION OF HARRIS MSJ #1 AGAINST SALES [DOC# 083]

RESEARCH AND PREPARATION OF HARRIS BRIEF AND APPENDIX SUPPORTING MSJ #1 [DOC# 084]

REVIEW OF ORDER GRANTING THIRD-PARTY LITIGANTS' MOTION TO EXTEND DISCOVERY DEADLINE FOR ADDITIONAL DEPOSITIONS[DOC# 100]

DEFENDANTS RESPONSES AND OBJECTIONS TO TRANSAM'S AND STANDARD SECURITY'S SECOND SET OF REQUESTS FORPRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS; LAM R

RESEARCH AND PREPARATION OF HARRIS RESPONSE TO SALES MSJ #1 [DOC# 108]

RESEARCH AND PREPARATION OF BRIEF AND APPENDIX SUPPORTING HARRIS RESPONSE TO SALES MSJ #1 [DOC# 109]

RESEARCH AND PREPARATION OF HARRIS RESPONSE TO SALES MSJ #1 [DOC# 108]

RESEARCH AND PREPARATION OF BRIEF AND APPENDIX SUPPORTING HARRIS RESPONSE TO SALES MSJ #1 [DOC# 109]

RESEARCH AND PREPARATION OF HARRIS' MOTION TO VACATE, ALTER OR AMEND OR FOR RECONSIDERATION [DOC# 157]

RESEARCH AND PREPARATION OF HARRIS' BRIEF ON ITS MOTION TO VACATE, ALTER OR AMEND OR FOR RECONSIDERATION [DOC#158]

INTEROFFICE EMAIL REINCKENS TO LAM RE: MODIFIED CROSSON MOTION

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM REINCKENS RE: MODIFIED CROSSON MOTION

RESEARCH AND PREPARATION OF FILED HARRIS' APPELLATE BRIEF

PREPARATION AND FILING OF HARRIS' RECORD EXCERPTS

RESEARCH AND PREPARATION OF FILED HARRIS' APPELLATE BRIEF

PREPARATION AND FILING OF HARRIS' RECORD EXCERPTS

OTHER TASK~

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Thu

Thu

Thu

Thu

Thu

Thu

Fri

Fri

Fri

Fri

Mon

Mon

Mon

Mon

Mon

Mon

Mon

Mon

DESCRIPTION

INFORMATIONAL

HOURS HOURS HOURSFEES EXH.

MBD 025

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 267-2 Filed 01/31/2008 Page 25 of 153

Page 26: Doc 267-2 - Example legal fees audit by Stuart, Maue, Mitchell & James legal fees auditing firm (rebuttal also uploaded)

Manziel Law OfficesIMPOSSIBLE LONG BILLING DAYS

EXHIBIT B

~ See the last page of exhibit for explanation

STUART MAUE

EXHIBIT B PAGE 3 of 7

11/10/04

01/31/06

01/31/06

01/31/06

01/31/06

01/31/06

01/31/06

01/31/06

01/31/06

01/31/06

01/31/06

01/31/06

01/31/06

01/31/06

01/31/06

01/31/06

01/31/06

01/31/06

01/31/06

DATE

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Manziel, L

NAME

65.00

45.00

50.00

3.50

4.00

6.00

4.00

7.00

6.00

6.00

5.00

2.00

3.00

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.50

0.25

0.25

ENTRY

65.00

45.00

50.00

3.50

4.00

6.00

4.00

7.00

6.00

6.00

5.00

2.00

3.00

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.50

0.25

0.25

COMBINED

16,250.00

11,250.00

12,500.00

875.00

1,000.00

1,500.00

1,000.00

1,750.00

1,500.00

1,500.00

1,250.00

500.00

750.00

62.50

62.50

62.50

125.00

62.50

62.50

COMBINED

02

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

140

742

744

746

747

748

749

750

751

752

754

756

757

758

759

760

761

762

763

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

RESEARCH AND PREPARATION OF HARRIS REPLY BRIEF

RESEARCH AND PREPARATION OF HARRIS 2ND MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [DOC# 178]

RESEARCH AND PREPARATION OF BRIEF SUPPORTING HARRIS 2ND MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [DOC# 179]

REVIEW OF BERKLEY'S RENEWED MOT TO STRIKE SALES' ANSWER TO COUNTERCLAIM [DOC# 180]

REVIEW OF BERKLEY'S RENEWED MSJ [DOC# 181]

REVIEW OF BERKLEY'S BRIEF SUPPORTING ITS RENEWED MSJ [DOC# 182]

REVIEW OF TRANSAMERICA & STANDARD'S RENEWED MSJ [DOC# 183]

REVIEW OF TRANSAMERICA'S BRIEF SUPPORTING ITS RENEWED MSJ [DOC# 184]

REVIEW OF STANDARD'S BRIEF SUPPORTING ITS RENEWED MSJ [DOC# 185]

REVIEW OF SALES MSJ (#2) V. HARRIS [DOC# 186]

REVIEW OF SALES BRIEF ON SALES MSJ#2 V. HARRIS [DOC# 187]

REVIEW OF SALES MPSJ (#2) V. TRANSAMERICA [DOC# 188]

REVIEW OF SALES BRIEF ON SALES MSJ#2 V. TRANSAMERICA [DOC# 189]

INTEROFFICE EMAIL AND DISCUSSION LAM TO REINCKENS RE: PROPOSED STATUS

INTEROFFICE EMAIL AND DISCUSSION LAM TO REINCKENS RE: PROPOSED STATUS; STATUS UNNECESSARY AT THIS TIME

INTEROFFICE EMAIL AND DISCUSSION REINCKENS TO LAM RE: PROPOSED STATUS

INTEROFFICE EMAIL AND DISCUSSION REINCKENS TO LAM RE: PROPOSED STATUS TO CLIENT

INTEROFFICE EMAIL AND DISCUSSION REINCKENS TO LAM RE: PROPOSED STATUS TO CLIENT; ADDITIONAL

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM AUBIN RE: JOINT PROTECTIVE ORDER, MEDIATOR CHOICE

OTHER TASK~

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Wed

Tue

Tue

Tue

Tue

Tue

Tue

Tue

Tue

Tue

Tue

Tue

Tue

Tue

Tue

Tue

Tue

Tue

Tue

DESCRIPTION

INFORMATIONAL

HOURS HOURS HOURSFEES EXH.

MBD 026

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 267-2 Filed 01/31/2008 Page 26 of 153

Page 27: Doc 267-2 - Example legal fees audit by Stuart, Maue, Mitchell & James legal fees auditing firm (rebuttal also uploaded)

Manziel Law OfficesIMPOSSIBLE LONG BILLING DAYS

EXHIBIT B

~ See the last page of exhibit for explanation

STUART MAUE

EXHIBIT B PAGE 4 of 7

01/31/06

01/31/06

02/21/06

02/21/06

02/21/06

02/21/06

02/21/06

02/21/06

02/21/06

02/21/06

02/21/06

02/21/06

02/21/06

02/21/06

02/21/06

02/21/06

03/08/06

03/08/06

DATE

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Manziel, L

Attorney

Attorney

NAME

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.15

3.00

6.50

0.50

75.00

32.00

0.25

16.00

12.00

12.00

0.25

16.00

0.25

7.50

2.50

ENTRY

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.15

3.00

6.50

0.50

75.00

32.00

0.25

16.00

12.00

12.00

0.25

16.00

0.25

7.50

2.50

COMBINED

62.50

62.50

62.50

37.50

750.00

1,625.00

125.00

18,750.00

8,000.00

62.50

4,000.00

3,000.00

3,000.00

62.50

4,000.00

62.50

1,875.00

625.00

COMBINED

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

764

765

818

819

820

822

824

825

827

829

830

832

834

836

837

839

858

860

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM CANDEE RE: SCHEDULING OF MEDIATION

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM CANDEE RE: SCHEDULING OF MEDIATION

REVIEW OF AGREED MOTION EXTENDING TIME FOR SALES TO RESPOND TO REINSURERS' MOT TO STRIKE 3RD PARTY CLAIM [DOC#192]

REVIEW OF ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND [DOC# 193]

REVIEW OF TRANSAMERICA'S RESPONSE TO SALES MPSJ [DOC# 194]

REVIEW OF TRANSAMERICA'S BRIEF RE RESPONSE TO SALES MPSJ [DOC# 195]

RESEARCH AND PREPARATION OF HARRIS RESPONSE TO SALES 2ND MSJ [DOC# 196]

RESEARCH AND PREPARATION OF BRIEF ON HARRIS RESPONSE TO SALES 2ND MSJ [DOC# 197]

COMPILE AND ORGANIZE APPENDIX FOR HARRIS RESPONSE TO SALES 2ND MSJ [DOC# 198]

REVIEW OF SALES RESPONSE TO REINSURER'S MSJ [DOC# 199]

REVIEW OF BRIEF RE SALES RESPONSE TO REINSURER'S MSJ [DOC# 200]

REVIEW OF SALES BRIEF RE RESPONSE TO STANDARD'S MSJ [DOC# 201]

REVIEW OF SALES RENEWED OBJECTIONS TO HARRIS EVIDENCE [DOC# 202]

REVIEW OF SALES RESPONSE TO HARRIS 2ND MSJ [DOC# 203]

REVIEW OF SALES BRIEF RE RESPONSE TO HARRIS 2ND MSJ [DOC# 204]

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM AUBIN RE: MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE RESPONSE; PROPOSED ORDER ATTACHED

REVIEW OF STANDARD'S REPLY ON EXCESS INSURER'S RENEWED MSJ [DOC# 209]

REVIEW OF STANDARD'S REPLY BRIEF ON EXCESS INSURER'S RENEWED MSJ [DOC# 210]

OTHER TASK~

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Tue

Tue

Tue

Tue

Tue

Tue

Tue

Tue

Tue

Tue

Tue

Tue

Tue

Tue

Tue

Tue

Wed

Wed

DESCRIPTION

INFORMATIONAL

HOURS HOURS HOURSFEES EXH.

MBD 027

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 267-2 Filed 01/31/2008 Page 27 of 153

Page 28: Doc 267-2 - Example legal fees audit by Stuart, Maue, Mitchell & James legal fees auditing firm (rebuttal also uploaded)

Manziel Law OfficesIMPOSSIBLE LONG BILLING DAYS

EXHIBIT B

~ See the last page of exhibit for explanation

STUART MAUE

EXHIBIT B PAGE 5 of 7

03/08/06

03/08/06

03/08/06

03/08/06

03/08/06

03/08/06

03/08/06

03/08/06

09/18/06

09/18/06

09/18/06

09/18/06

09/18/06

09/18/06

09/18/06

09/18/06

09/18/06

09/18/06

DATE

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Manziel, L

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Reinckens, J

NAME

0.25

62.00

0.25

3.50

8.00

4.00

0.50

0.25

0.25

65.00

0.25

0.50

0.25

0.50

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

ENTRY

0.25

62.00

0.25

3.50

8.00

4.00

0.50

0.25

0.25

65.00

0.25

0.50

0.25

0.50

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

COMBINED

62.50

15,500.00

62.50

875.00

2,000.00

1,000.00

125.00

62.50

62.50

16,250.00

62.50

125.00

62.50

125.00

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

COMBINED

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

861

862

864

865

866

868

870

871

943

944

946

948

950

952

949

951

953

947

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

RESEARCH AND PREPARATION OF HARRIS REPLY TO SALES RESPONSE TO HARRIS 2ND MSJ [DOC# 211]

RESEARCH AND PREPARATION OF BRIEF ON HARRIS REPLY TO SALES RESPONSE TO HARRIS 2ND MSJ [DOC# 212]

RESEARCH AND PREPARATION OF HARRIS OBJECTION TO VASQUEZ 2-26-2003 AFFIDAVIT [DOC# 213]

REVIEW OF SALES' REPLY BRIEF ON SALES MSJ V. TRANAMERICA [DOC# 214]

REVIEW OF SALES' OBJECTION TO HARRIS EVIDENCE [DOC# 215]

REVIEW OF SALES' REPLY TO HARRIS RESPONSE TO SALES MSJ#2 [DOC# 216]

INTEROFFICE EMAIL REINCKENS TO LAM RE: DOCUMENTS FILED TO DATE

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM REINCKENS RE: DOCUMENTS FILED TO DATE

RESEARCH AND PREPARATION OF HARRIS MOTION TO RECONSIDER [DOC# 227]

RESEARCH AND PREPARATION OF HARRIS BRIEF ON MOT TO RECONSIDER [DOC# 228]

INTEROFFICE EMAIL LAM TO REINCKENS RE: ORDER AND STATUS OF COURT'S COURTESY COPIES

INTEROFFICE EMAIL REINCKENS TO LAM RE: CROSSON AND PACIFICARE NOTICE

INTEROFFICE EMAIL REINCKENS TO LAM RE: ORDER AND STATUS OR COURT'S COURTESY COPIES; UPDATE PROVIDED

INTEROFFICE EMAIL REINCKENS TO LAM RE: RECONSIDER BRIEF; DOCUMENT ATTACHED

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM REINCKENS RE: CROSSON AND PACIFICARE NOTICE

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM REINCKENS RE: ORDER AND STATUS OR COURT'S COURTESY COPIES; UPDATE PROVIDED

LAM REV. EMAIL AND ATTACHMENT FROM REINCKENS RE: RECONSIDER BRIEF

REINCKENS REV. EMAIL FROM LAM RE: ORDER AND STATUS OF COURT'S COURTESY COPIES

OTHER TASK~

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Wed

Wed

Wed

Wed

Wed

Wed

Wed

Wed

Mon

Mon

Mon

Mon

Mon

Mon

Mon

Mon

Mon

Mon

DESCRIPTION

INFORMATIONAL

HOURS HOURS HOURSFEES EXH.

MBD 028

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 267-2 Filed 01/31/2008 Page 28 of 153

Page 29: Doc 267-2 - Example legal fees audit by Stuart, Maue, Mitchell & James legal fees auditing firm (rebuttal also uploaded)

Manziel Law OfficesIMPOSSIBLE LONG BILLING DAYS

EXHIBIT B

STUART MAUE

EXHIBIT B PAGE 6 of 7

1,128.05 $256,725.00

DATE NAMEENTRY COMBINED COMBINED

Total

OTHER TASK~ DESCRIPTION

INFORMATIONAL

HOURS HOURS HOURSFEES EXH.

Number of Entries: 73

MBD 029

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 267-2 Filed 01/31/2008 Page 29 of 153

Page 30: Doc 267-2 - Example legal fees audit by Stuart, Maue, Mitchell & James legal fees auditing firm (rebuttal also uploaded)

Manziel Law OfficesIMPOSSIBLE LONG BILLING DAYS

EXHIBIT B

STUART MAUE

EXHIBIT B PAGE 7 of 7

AssistantAttorneyManziel, LReinckens, J

TIMEKEEPER HOURS FEES HOURS FEES HOURS FEES HOURS FEES HOURS FEESISOLATED BLOCKED MAXIMUM PROPORTIONAL COMBINED

(~) REASONS FOR TASK HOUR ASSIGNMENTS

1,128.05 $256,725.00 0.00 $0.00 1,128.05 $256,725.00 0.00 $0.00 1,128.05 $256,725.00

144.50 981.05

2.25 0.25

10,837.50 245,262.50

562.50 62.50

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

144.50 981.05

2.25 0.25

10,837.50 245,262.50

562.50 62.50

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

144.50 981.05

2.25 0.25

10,837.50 245,262.50

562.50 62.50

RANGE OF HOURS

RANGE OF FEES

SUMMARY OF HOURS AND FEES BY INDIVIDUAL

MBD 030

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 267-2 Filed 01/31/2008 Page 30 of 153

Page 31: Doc 267-2 - Example legal fees audit by Stuart, Maue, Mitchell & James legal fees auditing firm (rebuttal also uploaded)

Manziel Law OfficesOTHER EXTRAORDINARILY LONG DAYS

EXHIBIT C

STUART MAUE

EXHIBIT C PAGE 1 of 3

AssistantAttorney

HOURS FEESTIMEKEEPER

49.50 140.50

3,712.50 35,125.00

190.00 $38,837.50

COMBINED COMBINED

MBD 031

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 267-2 Filed 01/31/2008 Page 31 of 153

Page 32: Doc 267-2 - Example legal fees audit by Stuart, Maue, Mitchell & James legal fees auditing firm (rebuttal also uploaded)

Manziel Law OfficesOTHER EXTRAORDINARILY LONG DAYS

EXHIBIT C

~ See the last page of exhibit for explanation

STUART MAUE

EXHIBIT C PAGE 2 of 3

190.00 $38,837.50

06/29/01

12/30/02

12/30/02

05/14/04

09/13/04

09/13/04

11/10/04

02/21/06

02/21/06

10/30/06

06/12/07

DATE

Attorney

Assistant

Attorney

Attorney

Assistant

Attorney

Assistant

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

NAME

14.00

13.50

13.50

18.00

21.00

21.00

15.00

16.00

16.00

20.00

22.00

ENTRY

14.00

13.50

13.50

18.00

21.00

21.00

15.00

16.00

16.00

20.00

22.00

COMBINED

3,500.00

1,012.50

3,375.00

4,500.00

1,575.00

5,250.00

1,125.00

4,000.00

4,000.00

5,000.00

5,500.00

COMBINED

01

01

01

01

02

02

02

01

01

01

01

1

428

427

618

90

80

150

830

837

999

1009

Total

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

RESEARCH AND PREPARATION OF HARRIS' ORIGINAL COMPLAINT [DOC# 001]

DEPOSITION OF KAREN HERMAN

DEPOSITION OF KAREN HERMAN

RESEARCH AND PREPARATION OF HARRIS' REPLY TO SALES' RESPONSE TO HARRIS' MOTION TO VACATE #1 [DOC# 162]

PREPARATION AND FILING OF HARRIS' RECORD EXCERPTS

PREPARATION AND FILING OF HARRIS' RECORD EXCERPTS

RESEARCH AND PREPARATION OF HARRIS REPLY BRIEF

REVIEW OF BRIEF RE SALES RESPONSE TO REINSURER'S MSJ [DOC# 200]

REVIEW OF SALES BRIEF RE RESPONSE TO HARRIS 2ND MSJ [DOC# 204]

RESEARCH AND PREPARATION OF HARRIS REPLY BRIEF TO SALES RESPONSE TO MOT TO RECONSIDER [DOC# 234]

6/12/2007 THROUGH 1/11/2008 - PREPARATION OF MOTION AND BRIEF FOR ATTORNEY FEES AND AFFIDAVIT AND EXHIBIT IN SUPPORTTHEREOF

OTHER TASK~

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Fri

Mon

Mon

Fri

Mon

Mon

Wed

Tue

Tue

Mon

Tue

DESCRIPTION

INFORMATIONAL

HOURS HOURS HOURSFEES EXH.

Number of Entries: 11

MBD 032

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 267-2 Filed 01/31/2008 Page 32 of 153

Page 33: Doc 267-2 - Example legal fees audit by Stuart, Maue, Mitchell & James legal fees auditing firm (rebuttal also uploaded)

Manziel Law OfficesOTHER EXTRAORDINARILY LONG DAYS

EXHIBIT C

STUART MAUE

EXHIBIT C PAGE 3 of 3

AssistantAttorney

TIMEKEEPER HOURS FEES HOURS FEES HOURS FEES HOURS FEES HOURS FEESISOLATED BLOCKED MAXIMUM PROPORTIONAL COMBINED

(~) REASONS FOR TASK HOUR ASSIGNMENTS

190.00 $38,837.50 0.00 $0.00 190.00 $38,837.50 0.00 $0.00 190.00 $38,837.50

49.50 140.50

3,712.50 35,125.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

49.50 140.50

3,712.50 35,125.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

49.50 140.50

3,712.50 35,125.00

RANGE OF HOURS

RANGE OF FEES

SUMMARY OF HOURS AND FEES BY INDIVIDUAL

MBD 033

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 267-2 Filed 01/31/2008 Page 33 of 153

Page 34: Doc 267-2 - Example legal fees audit by Stuart, Maue, Mitchell & James legal fees auditing firm (rebuttal also uploaded)

EXHIBIT D - Email of April 30, 2007

-----Original Message----- From: Lisa A. Manziel [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, April 30, 2007 1:18 PM To: Aubin, Richard E. Subject: Phone Call

Hi Rich: How are you? When will you have a few minutes to chat? Lisa.

Lisa A. Manziel MANZIEL LAW OFFICES 8330 Meadow Road, Suite 100 Dallas, TX 75231-3767 214-369-5500; Fax 214-369-6123

******************************************************************************* CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail transmission, including any attachments, is intended only for the use of the individual(s) and organization(s) named above and may contain information that is CONFIDENTIAL, PRIVILEGED and/or EXEMPT FROM DISCLOSURE under state or federal law, including attorney-client privilege or HIPAA. If you are not an intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of any of the information contained in this transmission is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. If you received this communication in error, immediately notify Manziel Law Offices at 214-369-5500 and delete the message. ********************************************************************************

MBD 034

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 267-2 Filed 01/31/2008 Page 34 of 153

Page 35: Doc 267-2 - Example legal fees audit by Stuart, Maue, Mitchell & James legal fees auditing firm (rebuttal also uploaded)

Manziel Law OfficesALL 362 EMAIL TASKS

EXHIBIT E

STUART MAUE

EXHIBIT E PAGE 1 of 23

Assistant 1AttorneyManziel, LReinckens, J

HOURS FEESTIMEKEEPER

3.00 39.00 64.25 8.25

268.75 9,750.00

16,062.50 2,062.50

114.50 $28,143.75

COMBINED COMBINED

MBD 035

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 267-2 Filed 01/31/2008 Page 35 of 153

Page 36: Doc 267-2 - Example legal fees audit by Stuart, Maue, Mitchell & James legal fees auditing firm (rebuttal also uploaded)

Manziel Law OfficesALL 362 EMAIL TASKS

EXHIBIT E

~ See the last page of exhibit for explanation

STUART MAUE

EXHIBIT E PAGE 2 of 23

09/14/01

09/17/01

05/20/02

05/20/02

06/17/02

06/19/02

08/08/02

08/13/02

08/13/02

08/15/02

08/15/02

08/16/02

08/18/02

08/18/02

08/19/02

08/20/02

08/20/02

08/20/02

DATE

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

NAME

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.50

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

ENTRY

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.50

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

COMBINED

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

125.00

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

COMBINED

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

12

14

55

56

69

75

107

108

109

114

115

119

121

122

123

126

127

128

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

LAM* EMAIL TO AUBIN RE: JOINT STATUS REPORT AND PROPOSED DISCOVERY PLAN

LAM REV. EMAIL RESPONSE FROM AUBIN RE: JOINT STATUS REPORT AND PROPOSED DISCOVERY PLAN; REVISIONS REQUESTED

LAM EMAIL TO CLIENT RE: TOPICS FOR DEPOSITION; SCHEDULING DEPOSITION

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM AUBIN RE: TOPICS FOR DEPOSITION

LAM EMAIL TO CLIENT REQUESTING INFO. AND MEDICAL RECORDS

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM CLIENT RE: REQUEST FOR INFO. AND MEDICAL RECORDS REQUESTED BY LAM [DOC #N/A]

LAM EMAIL TO AUBIN RE: SCHEDULING MEDIATION; RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION; MEDICAID RESPONSIBILITY

LAM EMAIL TO CLIENT CONFIRMING MEDIATION DETAIL

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM CLIENT REQUESTING CONFIRMATION OF MEDIATION DATE

LAM EMAIL TO CLIENT RE: RECORDS; UR NOTES INFO. REQUESTED

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM CLIENT RE: MEDICAL RECORDS; TO BE PROVIDED VIA OVERNIGHT DELIVERY

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM CLIENT RE: RECORDS

LAM EMAIL TO AUBIN RE: POSITION ON FILING PLAINTIFFS AMENDED SECOND AMENDED ORIGINAL PETITION; PLAINTIFFS MOTIONFOR LEAVE TO FI

LAM EMAIL TO WHITAKER RE: POSITION ON FILING PLAINTIFFS AMENDED SECOND AMENDED ORIGINAL PETITION; PLAINTIFFSMOTION FOR LEAVE TO

LAM REV. EMAIL RESPONSE FROM AUBIN RE: AMENDED MOTION; AUBIN REQUESTING LAM WITHDRAW PENDING MOTION

LAM EMAIL TO AUBIN RE: AMENDED MOTION; REQUESTING CONFIRMATION OF POSITION

LAM EMAIL TO CLIENT RE: UR RECORDS; QUESTION

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM CLIENT RE: UR RECORDS

OTHER TASK~

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Fri

Mon

Mon

Mon

Mon

Wed

Thu

Tue

Tue

Thu

Thu

Fri

Sun

Sun

Mon

Tue

Tue

Tue

DESCRIPTION

INFORMATIONAL

HOURS HOURS HOURSFEES EXH.

MBD 036

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 267-2 Filed 01/31/2008 Page 36 of 153

Page 37: Doc 267-2 - Example legal fees audit by Stuart, Maue, Mitchell & James legal fees auditing firm (rebuttal also uploaded)

Manziel Law OfficesALL 362 EMAIL TASKS

EXHIBIT E

~ See the last page of exhibit for explanation

STUART MAUE

EXHIBIT E PAGE 3 of 23

08/20/02

08/20/02

08/21/02

08/22/02

08/27/02

08/29/02

08/29/02

08/29/02

08/29/02

09/06/02

09/06/02

09/17/02

09/17/02

09/20/02

09/22/02

09/24/02

09/24/02

09/24/02

DATE

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

NAME

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

ENTRY

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

COMBINED

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

COMBINED

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

129

130

131

132

143

152

153

154

155

164

165

184

185

187

189

196

197

198

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM CLIENT RE: UTILIZATION REVIEW/RECORDS ON CROSSON

LAM REV. EMAIL RESPONSE FROM AUBIN RE: AMENDED MOTION; AUBIN NOT IN OPPOSITION

LAM EMAIL TO AUBIN RE: DEPOSITION SCHEDULING OF SSSI

LAM EMAIL TO AUBIN RE: SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSES TO DEFENSE'S REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION; SCHEDULING DEPOSITION OFSSSI

LAM EMAIL TO AUBIN RE: SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSES TO DEFENSE'S REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION

LAM EMAIL TO AUBIN RE: SCHEDULING MEDIATION; FILING AGREED MOTION RE: EXTENDING MEDIATION DATE

LAM EMAIL TO AUBIN RE: SCHEDULING REVIEW OF MEDICAID RECORDS; DATE SUGGESTED

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM AUBIN RE: SCHEDULING MEDIATION; POSTPONEMENT SUGGESTED

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM AUBIN RE: SCHEDULING REVIEW OF MEDICAID RECORDS; AUBIN REQUESTING DATE

LAM EMAIL TO CLIENT RE: PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS; REQUESTING CONFIRMATION OF NO ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS

LAM REV. EMAIL RESPONSE FROM CLIENT RE: PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS

LAM EMAIL TO AUBIN RE: MEDIATION/DEPOSITION OF KAREN HERMANN; CONFIRMING AGREEMENT TO POSTPONE DEPOSITION; RE-SCHEDULING OF SAME

LAM EMAIL TO AUBIN RE: TOPICS FOR DEPOSITION OF KAREN HARMANN

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM AUBIN RE: MS. CROSSON'S PRESENCE AT MEDIATION

LAM EMAIL TO AUBIN RE: MS. CROSSON'S PRESENCE AT MEDIATION; RESPONSE PROVIDED

LAM EMAIL TO AUBIN PROVIDING CONTACT INFO. FOR MS. CROSSON; REQUESTING CONFIRMATION OF DEPOSITION DATE

LAM EMAIL TO CANDEE RE: RESPONSES TO REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS; REQUEST FOR DEPOSITION DATES

LAM EMAIL TO COUNSEL REQUESTING ANY OBJECTIONS TO MS. CROSSON'S PRESENCE AT MEDIATION

OTHER TASK~

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Tue

Tue

Wed

Thu

Tue

Thu

Thu

Thu

Thu

Fri

Fri

Tue

Tue

Fri

Sun

Tue

Tue

Tue

DESCRIPTION

INFORMATIONAL

HOURS HOURS HOURSFEES EXH.

MBD 037

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 267-2 Filed 01/31/2008 Page 37 of 153

Page 38: Doc 267-2 - Example legal fees audit by Stuart, Maue, Mitchell & James legal fees auditing firm (rebuttal also uploaded)

Manziel Law OfficesALL 362 EMAIL TASKS

EXHIBIT E

~ See the last page of exhibit for explanation

STUART MAUE

EXHIBIT E PAGE 4 of 23

09/24/02

09/24/02

09/24/02

09/24/02

09/25/02

10/14/02

10/14/02

10/14/02

10/15/02

10/15/02

10/16/02

10/21/02

10/21/02

10/23/02

10/23/02

11/10/02

11/13/02

11/13/02

DATE

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Attorney

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

NAME

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.50

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

2.50

0.25

ENTRY

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.50

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

2.50

0.25

COMBINED

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

125.00

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

625.00

62.50

COMBINED

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

199

200

201

202

209

243

244

245

253

254

259

266

267

276

277

295

301

302

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

LAM EMAIL TO COUNSEL REQUESTING DEPOSITION DATES

LAM EMAIL TO COUNSEL REQUESTING MEDIATION/DEPOSITION DATES

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM AUBIN RE: DEPOSITION DATE; SCHEDULING ADDITIONAL DATES

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM AUBIN REQUESTING CONTACT INFO. FOR MS. CROSSON [DOC # N/A]

INTEROFFICE EMAIL LAM TO ASST. RE: DESIGNATION OF EXPERTS

LAM EMAIL TO AUBIN RE: PLAINTIFF'S SECOND REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS TO DEFENDANTS

LAM EMAIL TO AUBIN RE: PLAINTIFF'S SECOND REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS TO DEFENDANTS

LAM EMAIL TO CANDEE RE: PLAINTIFF'S FIRST REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS TO BERKLEY

LAM EMAIL TO AUBIN RE: PLAINTIFF'S THIRD SET OF REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS TO DEFENDANTS

LAM EMAIL TO CANDEE RE: PLAINTIFF'S SECOND SET OF REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS TO BERKLEY

LAM EMAIL TO AUBIN AND CANDEE RE: PLAINTIFFS FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES TO DEFENDANTS AND PLAINTIFFS FIRST SET OFINTERROGATOR

LAM EMAIL TO AUBIN RE: DEPOSITION OF SSSI, KAREN HERMANN; CASE LAW

LAM EMAIL TO AUBIN RE: DESIGNATION OF CORP. REP. [DOC # N/A]

LAM EMAIL TO AUBIN RE: SCHEDULED DEPOSITION OF SSSI, KAREN HERMANN; REQUESTING CONFIRMATION OF INTENTION TORESPOND TO DISCOVERY;

LAM EMAIL TO AUBIN REQUESTING DEPOSITION. SCHEDULING FOR MR. DUNSTON

LAM EMAIL TO CLIENT RE: OBTAINING CURRICULUM VITAE FOR WITNESSES.

LAM EMAIL TO AND CONFERENCE WITH CLIENT RE: CURRICULUM VITAE; SYNOPSIS OF CASE

LAM EMAIL TO CLIENT REQUESTING COMPLETION OF DISCOVERY AND VERIFICATION OF INTERROGATORIES

OTHER TASK~

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Tue

Tue

Tue

Tue

Wed

Mon

Mon

Mon

Tue

Tue

Wed

Mon

Mon

Wed

Wed

Sun

Wed

Wed

DESCRIPTION

INFORMATIONAL

HOURS HOURS HOURSFEES EXH.

MBD 038

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 267-2 Filed 01/31/2008 Page 38 of 153

Page 39: Doc 267-2 - Example legal fees audit by Stuart, Maue, Mitchell & James legal fees auditing firm (rebuttal also uploaded)

Manziel Law OfficesALL 362 EMAIL TASKS

EXHIBIT E

~ See the last page of exhibit for explanation

STUART MAUE

EXHIBIT E PAGE 5 of 23

11/17/02

11/18/02

11/19/02

11/20/02

11/20/02

11/20/02

11/26/02

11/27/02

12/06/02

12/06/02

12/08/02

12/09/02

01/07/03

01/27/03

01/31/03

02/23/03

02/24/03

DATE

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

NAME

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.50

0.50

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

ENTRY

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.50

0.50

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

COMBINED

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

125.00

125.00

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

COMBINED

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

317

319

325

332

333

335

354

360

376

377

383

386

444

457

463

478

480

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

LAM EMAIL TO CLIENT RE: SCHEDULING TELEPHONE DEPOSITIONS FOR PERSONS IDENTIFIED BY INITIALS IN PT. ACCT. NOTES [DOC #N/A]

LAM EMAIL TO CLIENT RE: IDENTITIES OF PERSON IN PT. ACCT. NOTES; QUESTION

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM CLIENT RE: IDENTITIES OF PERSON IN PT. ACCT. NOTES; ANSWER PROVIDED

LAM EMAIL TO CLIENT RE: IDENTITIES OF PERSON IN PT. ACCT. NOTES; COORDINATION AND PREP. FOR DEPOSITION

LAM EMAIL TO CLIENT RE: IDENTITIES OF PERSON IN PT. ACCT. NOTES; REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFO.

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM CLIENT RE: IDENTITIES OF PERSON IN PT. ACCT. NOTES; CONFIRMATION OF DEPOSITION DETAILS

LAM EMAIL TO CLIENT REQUESTING APPENDIX TO CONTRACT, COPY OF AGREEMENT

LAM EMAIL TO CLIENT RE: REQUEST FOR APPENDIX TO CONTRACT, COPY OF AGREEMENT; CORRECTION PROVIDED

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM CLIENT RE: PROAMERICA PAYOR LISTING; WILL NEED TO CONTACT PROAMERICA LEGAL DEPARTMENT;CONTACT INFO. PROVIDED

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM CLIENT RE: REQUEST FOR APPENDIX TO CONTRACT, COPY OF AGREEMENT; CLIENT ADVISED SUBPOENA MAYBE NECESSARY

LAM EMAIL TO CLIENT REQUESTING LAST KNOWN ADDRESS FOR FORMER HARRIS EMPLOYEE IDENTIFIED BY INITIALS IN PT. ACCT.NOTES [DOC # N/A]

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM CLIENT RE: REQUEST FOR LAST KNOWN ADDRESS FOR PERSON IDENTIFIED BY INITIALS IN PT. ACCT. NOTES;CLIENT ADVISED

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM CLIENT RE: REQUEST FOR WITNESS INFO.; INFORMATION PROVIDED WITH RESPECT TO PERSONS IDENTIFIEDBY INITIALS IN P

LAM EMAIL TO CLIENT REQUESTING REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF AFFIDAVITS RELATED TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGEMENT

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM CLIENT RE: REQUEST FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF AFFIDAVITS RELATED TO MOTION FOR SUMMARYJUDGEMENT; RESPONSES PR

LAM EMAIL TO CLIENT RE: SCHEDULING OF DEPOSITIONS; INFO. REQUESTED

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM CLIENT RE: SCHEDULING OF DEPOSITIONS OF DAVIS, CHAFFIN AND CROSSON; INFO. PROVIDED BY CLIENT

OTHER TASK~

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Sun

Mon

Tue

Wed

Wed

Wed

Tue

Wed

Fri

Fri

Sun

Mon

Tue

Mon

Fri

Sun

Mon

DESCRIPTION

INFORMATIONAL

HOURS HOURS HOURSFEES EXH.

MBD 039

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 267-2 Filed 01/31/2008 Page 39 of 153

Page 40: Doc 267-2 - Example legal fees audit by Stuart, Maue, Mitchell & James legal fees auditing firm (rebuttal also uploaded)

Manziel Law OfficesALL 362 EMAIL TASKS

EXHIBIT E

~ See the last page of exhibit for explanation

STUART MAUE

EXHIBIT E PAGE 6 of 23

04/16/03

04/16/03

05/02/03

05/02/03

05/02/03

05/02/03

05/05/03

05/05/03

05/05/03

05/05/03

05/05/03

05/05/03

06/04/03

06/04/03

12/15/03

12/15/03

12/18/03

12/18/03

DATE

Assistant 1

Manziel, L

Assistant 1

Assistant 1

Attorney

Manziel, L

Assistant 1

Assistant 1

Assistant 1

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Assistant 1

Manziel, L

Assistant 1

Manziel, L

Assistant 1

Manziel, L

NAME

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

ENTRY

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

COMBINED

18.75

62.50

18.75

18.75

62.50

62.50

18.75

18.75

18.75

62.50

62.50

62.50

18.75

62.50

18.75

62.50

18.75

62.50

COMBINED

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

524

525

536

538

535

539

540

542

545

541

543

546

558

559

576

577

581

582

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

LA EMAIL TO LAM RE: STATUS OF BRENDA CROSSON DEPOSITION

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM LA RE: STATUS OF BRENDA CROSSON DEPOSITION

LA EMAIL TO LAM RE: MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

LA EMAIL TO LAM RE: S/W AUBIN RE: MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; AUBIN REQUESTING SETTLEMENT

INTEROFFICE EMAIL LAM TO REINCKENS RE: MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; LA TO CONTACT AUBIN REQUESTING SETTLEMENTOFFER

LAM EMAIL TO LA RE: MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; AUBIN REQUESTING SETTLEMENT; LA TO REQUEST OFFER FROM AUBIN

LA EMAIL TO LAM RE: MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; LA TO CONTACT AUBIN REQUESTING SETTLEMENT OFFER

LA EMAIL TO LAM RE: MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; LA ADVISED AUBIN OF REQUEST FOR SETTLEMENT OFFER

LA EMAIL TO LAM RE: SETTLEMENT AMOUNT; LEVINE REQUESTING SETTLEMENT FIGURE FROM LAM

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM LA RE: MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; LA TO CONTACT AUBIN REQUESTING SETTLEMENT OFFER

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM LA RE: MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; LA ADVISED AUBIN OF REQUEST FOR SETTLEMENT OFFER

LAM REV. EMAIL RE: SETTLEMENT AMOUNT; LEVINE REQUESTING SETTLEMENT FIGURE FROM LAM

LA EMAIL TO LAM RE: MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT RESPONSE; TO BE SENT VIA U.S. MAIL

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM LA RE: MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT RESPONSE; TO BE SENT VIA U.S. MAIL

LA EMAIL TO LAM RE: AGREED MOTION TO CANCEL PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE

LAM REV. EMAIL RE: AGREED MOTION TO CANCEL PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE

LA EMAIL TO LAM RE: PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE AND PRE-TRIAL ORDER SUBMISSION

LAM REV. EMAIL RE: PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE AND PRE-TRIAL ORDER SUBMISSION

OTHER TASK~

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Wed

Wed

Fri

Fri

Fri

Fri

Mon

Mon

Mon

Mon

Mon

Mon

Wed

Wed

Mon

Mon

Thu

Thu

DESCRIPTION

INFORMATIONAL

HOURS HOURS HOURSFEES EXH.

MBD 040

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 267-2 Filed 01/31/2008 Page 40 of 153

Page 41: Doc 267-2 - Example legal fees audit by Stuart, Maue, Mitchell & James legal fees auditing firm (rebuttal also uploaded)

Manziel Law OfficesALL 362 EMAIL TASKS

EXHIBIT E

~ See the last page of exhibit for explanation

STUART MAUE

EXHIBIT E PAGE 7 of 23

03/26/04

03/26/04

03/26/04

03/26/04

03/26/04

03/26/04

03/27/04

03/28/04

03/28/04

03/28/04

03/28/04

03/29/04

03/29/04

04/16/04

04/16/04

05/04/04

05/04/04

06/06/04

DATE

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Attorney

Manziel, L

Assistant 1

Manziel, L

Attorney

Manziel, L

Attorney

NAME

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

ENTRY

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

COMBINED

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

18.75

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

COMBINED

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

589

591

593

590

592

594

595

596

598

597

599

604

605

611

612

615

616

622

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

INTEROFFICE EMAIL REINCKENS TO LAM RE: FORMATTING OF MOTION

INTEROFFICE EMAIL REINCKENS TO LAM RE: LATEST VERSION OF MOTION; BENEFIT ASSIGNMENT

INTEROFFICE EMAIL REINCKENS TO LAM RE: RATIFICATION OF ASSIGNMENT; RELEVANCY OF CONTENTS OF BRENDA CROSSON'SAFFIDAVIT

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM REINCKENS RE: FORMATTING OF MOTION

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM REINCKENS RE: LATEST VERSION OF MOTION; BENEFIT ASSIGNMENT

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM REINCKENS RE: RATIFICATION OF ASSIGNMENT; RELEVANCY OF CONTENTS OF BRENDA CROSSON'SAFFIDAVIT

INTEROFFICE EMAIL REINCKENS TO LAM REQUESTING LATEST MOTION

INTEROFFICE EMAIL REINCKENS TO LAM RE: DIFFERENCE BETWEEN ASSIGNMENT AND AUTHORIZATION

INTEROFFICE EMAIL REINCKENS TO LAM RE: FALLING THRU TO STATE LAW IF CONTRACT IS AMBIGUOUS

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM REINCKENS RE: DIFFERENCE BETWEEN ASSIGNMENT AND AUTHORIZATION

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM REINCKENS RE: FALLING THRU TO STATE LAW IF CONTRACT IS AMBIGUOUS

INTEROFFICE EMAIL REINCKENS TO LAM RE: MODIFIED CROSSON MOTION

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM REINCKENS RE: MODIFIED CROSSON MOTION

LA EMAIL TO LAM RE: PREP. & FAX OF DOC.S TO RYE & HINDER FOR MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION [DOC # N/A]

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM LA RE: PREP. AND FAX OF DOCUMENTS TO RYE & HINDER FOR MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION [DOC # N/A]

INTEROFFICE EMAIL REINCKENS TO LAM RE: STATUS OF CASES IN FED. COURT

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM REINCKENS RE: STATUS OF CASES IN FED. COURT [DOC #N/A]

INTEROFFICE EMAIL LAM EMAIL TO REINCKENS REQUESTING PREP. OF NOTICE OF APPEAL

OTHER TASK~

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Fri

Fri

Fri

Fri

Fri

Fri

Sat

Sun

Sun

Sun

Sun

Mon

Mon

Fri

Fri

Tue

Tue

Sun

DESCRIPTION

INFORMATIONAL

HOURS HOURS HOURSFEES EXH.

MBD 041

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 267-2 Filed 01/31/2008 Page 41 of 153

Page 42: Doc 267-2 - Example legal fees audit by Stuart, Maue, Mitchell & James legal fees auditing firm (rebuttal also uploaded)

Manziel Law OfficesALL 362 EMAIL TASKS

EXHIBIT E

~ See the last page of exhibit for explanation

STUART MAUE

EXHIBIT E PAGE 8 of 23

06/06/04

06/07/04

06/07/04

06/16/04

06/16/04

06/16/04

06/16/04

09/15/04

11/03/04

04/07/05

04/13/05

04/21/05

04/22/05

04/22/05

04/22/05

04/22/05

04/22/05

10/13/05

DATE

Reinckens, J

Attorney

Manziel, L

Attorney

Attorney

Manziel, L

Reinckens, J

Manziel, L

Attorney

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Attorney

NAME

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.50

ENTRY

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.50

COMBINED

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

125.00

COMBINED

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

623

624

625

626

628

627

629

652

657

661

662

663

664

665

666

667

668

671

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

REINCKENS REV. EMAIL FROM LAM RE: PREP. OF NOTICE OF APPEAL

INTEROFFICE EMAIL REINCKENS TO LAM RE: NOTICE OF APPEAL PREPPED

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM REINCKENS RE: NOTICE OF APPEAL PREPPED

INTEROFFICE EMAIL REINCKENS TO LAM RE: STATUS OF APPEAL NOTICE; CLERK'S OFFICE ACCESSES SAME INTERNET-BASEDSYSTEM COUNSEL CAN ACC

INTEROFFICE EMAIL LAM TO REINCKENS REQUESTING NEXT DAY SYSTEM CHECK

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM REINCKENS RE: STATUS OF APPEAL NOTICE; CLERK'S OFFICE ACCESSES SAME INTERNET-BASED SYSTEMCOUNSEL CAN ACCESS,

REINCKENS REV. EMAIL FROM LAM RE: NEXT DAY SYSTEM CHECK

LAM EMAIL TO SEWELL RE: APPELLANT'S BRIEF ATTACHED

INTEROFFICE EMAIL LAM TO REINCKENS RE: POINTS FOR BRIEF REPLY

LAM EMAIL TO AUBIN RE: JOINT MOTION TO WAIVE ORAL ARGUMENT; REQUESTING AUBIN TO ADVISE ASAP

LAM EMAIL TO AUBIN REQUESTING STATUS OF MOTION TO WAIVE ORAL ARGUMENT

LAM EMAIL TO WHITAKER RE: JOINT MOTION TO WAIVE ORAL ARGUMENT; REQUESTING WHITAKER TO ADVISE ASAP

LAM EMAIL TO AUBIN RE: JOINT MOTION TO WAIVE ORAL ARGUMENT; CHANGE TO BE MADE

LAM EMAIL TO AUBIN RE: WAIVER OF ORAL ARGUMENT, FINAL VERSION

LAM EMAIL TO CANDEE RE: WAIVER OF ORAL ARGUMENT, FINAL VERSION; CORRECTION TO BE MADE

LAM REV. EMAIL RESPONSE FROM AUBIN RE: JOINT MOTION TO WAIVE ORAL ARGUMENT; AUBIN REQUESTING CHANGE

LAM REV. EMAIL RESPONSE FROM CANDEE RE: WAIVER OF ORAL ARGUMENT, FINAL VERSION; CANDEE REQUESTING CORRECTION

INTEROFFICE EMAIL AND DISCUSSION LAM TO REINCKENS RE: STATUS OF RECORD RETURN; REINCKENS TO OBTAIN CURRENTSTATUS

OTHER TASK~

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Sun

Mon

Mon

Wed

Wed

Wed

Wed

Wed

Wed

Thu

Wed

Thu

Fri

Fri

Fri

Fri

Fri

Thu

DESCRIPTION

INFORMATIONAL

HOURS HOURS HOURSFEES EXH.

MBD 042

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 267-2 Filed 01/31/2008 Page 42 of 153

Page 43: Doc 267-2 - Example legal fees audit by Stuart, Maue, Mitchell & James legal fees auditing firm (rebuttal also uploaded)

Manziel Law OfficesALL 362 EMAIL TASKS

EXHIBIT E

~ See the last page of exhibit for explanation

STUART MAUE

EXHIBIT E PAGE 9 of 23

10/14/05

10/16/05

10/17/05

11/08/05

11/16/05

11/16/05

11/21/05

11/21/05

11/21/05

11/21/05

11/22/05

11/22/05

11/22/05

11/22/05

11/22/05

11/22/05

11/22/05

11/22/05

DATE

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Reinckens, J

Manziel, L

Reinckens, J

Reinckens, J

Reinckens, J

Attorney

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Reinckens, J

NAME

0.50

0.25

0.25

0.50

0.25

0.25

0.50

0.50

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.50

0.50

0.50

0.50

0.50

0.50

0.25

ENTRY

0.50

0.25

0.25

0.50

0.25

0.25

0.50

0.50

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.50

0.50

0.50

0.50

0.50

0.50

0.25

COMBINED

125.00

62.50

62.50

125.00

62.50

62.50

125.00

125.00

62.50

62.50

62.50

125.00

125.00

125.00

125.00

125.00

125.00

62.50

COMBINED

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

672

674

675

682

684

683

686

685

687

688

689

690

691

692

693

694

695

696

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

INTEROFFICE EMAIL REINCKENS TO LAM RE: STATUS OF RECORD RETURN

INTEROFFICE EMAIL LAM TO REINCKENS RE: STATUS OF RECORD RETURN; LAM REQUESTING FURTHER EXPLANATION FROMREINCKENS

INTEROFFICE EMAIL REINCKENS TO LAM RE: STATUS OF RECORD RETURN; ADDITIONAL EXPLANATION PROVIDED

LAM EMAIL TO ALL COUNSEL RE: JOINT STATUS REPORT; REQUESTING DRAFTS FROM ALL COUNSEL BY 11/15/2005

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM REINCKENS RE: RE: JOINT STATUS REPORT; REQUESTING PARTIES' POSITIONS ON ADDITIONAL MEDIATION

REINCKENS EMAIL TO ALL COUNSEL RE: JOINT STATUS REPORT; REQUESTING PARTIES' POSITIONS ON ADDITIONAL MEDIATION

LAM, REINCKENS REV. EMAIL RESPONSE FROM WHITAKER; POSITION PROVIDED

REINCKENS EMAIL TO ALL COUNSEL RE: CLARIFICATION OF POSITIONS FOR JOINT STATUS REPORT

REINCKENS EMAIL TO ALL COUNSEL RE: JOINT STATUS REPORT (ADDITIONAL); REQUESTING RESPONSE TO CLARIFICATION

REINCKENS EMAIL TO ALL COUNSEL REQUESTING ANY ADDITIONAL JOINT STATUS REPORT LANGUAGE TO BE INCLUDED IN DRAFT

INTEROFFICE EMAIL REINCKENS TO LAM RE: JOINT STATUS REPORT, MEDIATOR CHANGE

LAM, REINCKENS REV. EMAIL FROM AUBIN RE: MEDIATOR CHANGE; JOINT STATUS LANGUAGE PROVIDED

LAM, REINCKENS REV. EMAIL RESPONSE FROM AUBIN APPROVING JOINT STATUS REPORT

LAM, REINCKENS REV. EMAIL RESPONSE FROM CANDEE RE: CHANGE IN MEDIATOR

LAM, REINCKENS REV. EMAIL RESPONSE FROM CANDEE APPROVING JOINT STATUS REPORT

LAM, REINCKENS REV. EMAIL RESPONSE FROM CANDEE APPROVING JOINT STATUS REPORT

LAM, REINCKENS REV. EMAIL RESPONSE FROM WHITAKER; WHITAKER REQUESTING CHANGE IN LANGUAGE

REINCKENS EMAIL TO ALL COUNSEL RE: DRAFT OF JOINT STATUS REPORT

OTHER TASK~

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Fri

Sun

Mon

Tue

Wed

Wed

Mon

Mon

Mon

Mon

Tue

Tue

Tue

Tue

Tue

Tue

Tue

Tue

DESCRIPTION

INFORMATIONAL

HOURS HOURS HOURSFEES EXH.

MBD 043

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 267-2 Filed 01/31/2008 Page 43 of 153

Page 44: Doc 267-2 - Example legal fees audit by Stuart, Maue, Mitchell & James legal fees auditing firm (rebuttal also uploaded)

Manziel Law OfficesALL 362 EMAIL TASKS

EXHIBIT E

~ See the last page of exhibit for explanation

STUART MAUE

EXHIBIT E PAGE 10 of 23

11/22/05

11/22/05

11/22/05

11/22/05

11/23/05

11/23/05

11/23/05

11/23/05

11/23/05

11/23/05

11/23/05

11/23/05

11/23/05

01/09/06

01/09/06

01/10/06

01/10/06

DATE

Reinckens, J

Reinckens, J

Reinckens, J

Reinckens, J

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Reinckens, J

Reinckens, J

Attorney

Manziel, L

Attorney

Attorney

NAME

0.25

0.50

0.25

0.25

0.25

1.00

1.00

0.50

0.50

0.50

0.50

0.25

0.25

0.50

0.50

0.25

0.25

ENTRY

0.25

0.50

0.25

0.25

0.25

1.00

1.00

0.50

0.50

0.50

0.50

0.25

0.25

0.50

0.50

0.25

0.25

COMBINED

62.50

125.00

62.50

62.50

62.50

250.00

250.00

125.00

125.00

125.00

125.00

62.50

62.50

125.00

125.00

62.50

62.50

COMBINED

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

697

698

699

700

703

704

705

706

707

708

709

710

711

715

716

717

718

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

REINCKENS EMAIL TO CANDEE REQUESTING JOINT STATUS REPORT POSITION, ITEMS 2 AND 3

REINCKENS EMAIL TO COUNSEL RE: DRAFT OF JOINT STATUS REPORT, INCLUDING REQUESTED REVISIONS

REINCKENS EMAIL TO WHITAKER RE: JOINT STATUS REPORT; NO KNOWN TIMEFRAME FOR REVISED DRAFT

REINCKENS REV. EMAIL RESPONSE FROM AUBIN AUTHORIZING ELECTRONIC SIG.

LAM EMAIL TO COUNSEL NOTIFYING JOINT STATUS REPORT FILED ELECTRONICALLY; COPY ATTACHED

LAM, REINCKENS REV. AND DISCUSS EMAIL RESPONSE FROM AUBIN RE: LANGUAGE REQUESTED BY WHITAKER FOR JOINT STATUSREPORT

LAM, REINCKENS REV. AND DISCUSS EMAIL RESPONSE FROM WHITAKER RE: JOINT STATUS REPORT; WHITAKER REQUESTINGADDITIONAL LANGUAGE

LAM, REINCKENS REV. EMAIL RESPONSE FROM AUBIN AUTHORIZING ELECTRONIC SIG. FOR JOINT STATUS REPORT

LAM, REINCKENS REV. EMAIL RESPONSE FROM CANDEE RE: LANGUAGE REQUESTED BY WHITAKER FOR JOINT STATUS REPORT

LAM, REINCKENS REV. EMAIL RESPONSE FROM WHITAKER AUTHORIZING ELECTRONIC SIG. FOR JOINT STATUS REPORT

LAM, REINCKENS REV. EMAIL RESPONSE FROM WHITAKER RE: JOINT STATUS REPORT; WHITAKER REQUESTING ADDITIONALLANGUAGE

REINCKENS EMAIL TO WHITAKER RE: JOINT STATUS REPORT, RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL LANGUAGE

REINCKENS EMAIL TO WHITAKER RE: JOINT STATUS REPORT; REQUESTED LANGUAGE INCLUDED; REQUESTING AUTHORIZATION FORELECTRONIC SIGNATUR

INTEROFFICE EMAIL AND DISCUSSION REINCKENS TO LAM RE: LENGTH OF BRIEF

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM REINCKENS RE: LENGTH OF BRIEF

INTEROFFICE EMAIL LAM TO REINCKENS RE: LENGTH OF BRIEF; RESPONSE

INTEROFFICE EMAIL REINCKENS TO LAM RE: LENGTH AND FORMATTING OF MOTION AND BRIEF

OTHER TASK~

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Tue

Tue

Tue

Tue

Wed

Wed

Wed

Wed

Wed

Wed

Wed

Wed

Wed

Mon

Mon

Tue

Tue

DESCRIPTION

INFORMATIONAL

HOURS HOURS HOURSFEES EXH.

MBD 044

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 267-2 Filed 01/31/2008 Page 44 of 153

Page 45: Doc 267-2 - Example legal fees audit by Stuart, Maue, Mitchell & James legal fees auditing firm (rebuttal also uploaded)

Manziel Law OfficesALL 362 EMAIL TASKS

EXHIBIT E

~ See the last page of exhibit for explanation

STUART MAUE

EXHIBIT E PAGE 11 of 23

01/10/06

01/12/06

01/12/06

01/16/06

01/16/06

01/18/06

01/18/06

01/18/06

01/18/06

01/19/06

01/19/06

01/26/06

01/26/06

01/26/06

01/26/06

01/27/06

01/27/06

01/27/06

01/27/06

DATE

Manziel, L

Attorney

Manziel, L

Attorney

Manziel, L

Attorney

Attorney

Manziel, L

Reinckens, J

Attorney

Manziel, L

Attorney

Attorney

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Manziel, L

NAME

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.50

0.50

0.25

0.50

ENTRY

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.50

0.50

0.25

0.50

COMBINED

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

125.00

125.00

62.50

125.00

COMBINED

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

719

720

721

722

723

724

725

726

727

728

729

730

732

731

733

734

736

738

735

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM REINCKENS RE: LENGTH AND FORMATTING OF MOTION AND BRIEF

INTEROFFICE EMAIL REINCKENS TO LAM RE: QUESTION ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT FOOTNOTE 14

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM REINCKENS RE: QUESTION ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT FOOTNOTE 14

INTEROFFICE EMAIL REINCKENS TO LAM RE: QUESTION ON BRIEF FOOTNOTE 4

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM REINCKENS RE: QUESTION ON BRIEF FOOTNOTE 4

INTEROFFICE EMAIL LAM TO REINCKENS RE: NO CHANGES TO SECOND MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, QUESTION ON TITLE

INTEROFFICE EMAIL REINCKENS TO LAM RE: NO CHANGES TO SECOND MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

LAM REV. AND RESPOND TO EMAIL FROM REINCKENS RE: NO CHANGES TO SECOND MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; QUESTION

REINCKENS REV. EMAIL FROM LAM RE: NO CHANGES TO SECOND MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; QUESTION

INTEROFFICE EMAIL REINCKENS TO LAM RE: NO CHANGES TO SECOND MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; QUESTION ANSWERED

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM REINCKENS RE: NO CHANGES TO SECOND MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; QUESTION ANSWERED

INTEROFFICE EMAIL REINCKENS TO LAM RE; NEED APPENDIX REF. FOR MEDICAID FILING

INTEROFFICE EMAIL REINCKENS TO LAM RE: UB02 FOR MEDICAID CLAIM FILING

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM REINCKENS RE: NEED APPENDIX REF. FOR MEDICAID FILING

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM REINCKENS RE: UB02 FOR MEDICAID CLAIM FILING

INTEROFFICE EMAIL AND DISCUSSION REINCKENS TO LAM RE: MEDICAID REIMBURSEMENT; ADDITIONAL ISSUES

INTEROFFICE EMAIL REINCKENS TO LAM RE: MEDICAID LANGUAGE FOR BRIEF OR MOTION

INTEROFFICE EMAIL REINCKENS TO LAM RE: MEDICAID REIMBURSEMENT

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM REINCKENS RE: MEDICAID REIMBURSEMENT; ADDITIONAL ISSUES

OTHER TASK~

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Tue

Thu

Thu

Mon

Mon

Wed

Wed

Wed

Wed

Thu

Thu

Thu

Thu

Thu

Thu

Fri

Fri

Fri

Fri

DESCRIPTION

INFORMATIONAL

HOURS HOURS HOURSFEES EXH.

MBD 045

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 267-2 Filed 01/31/2008 Page 45 of 153

Page 46: Doc 267-2 - Example legal fees audit by Stuart, Maue, Mitchell & James legal fees auditing firm (rebuttal also uploaded)

Manziel Law OfficesALL 362 EMAIL TASKS

EXHIBIT E

~ See the last page of exhibit for explanation

STUART MAUE

EXHIBIT E PAGE 12 of 23

01/27/06

01/27/06

01/30/06

01/30/06

01/31/06

01/31/06

01/31/06

01/31/06

01/31/06

01/31/06

01/31/06

01/31/06

02/01/06

02/01/06

02/01/06

02/01/06

02/01/06

02/01/06

02/01/06

DATE

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Attorney

Manziel, L

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

NAME

0.25

0.50

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.50

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.50

0.50

0.25

0.50

0.50

ENTRY

0.25

0.50

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.50

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.50

0.50

0.25

0.50

0.50

COMBINED

62.50

125.00

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

125.00

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

125.00

125.00

62.50

125.00

125.00

COMBINED

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

737

739

740

741

758

759

760

761

762

763

764

765

767

768

769

771

773

775

777

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM REINCKENS RE: MEDICAID LANGUAGE FOR BRIEF OR MOTION

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM REINCKENS RE: MEDICAID REIMBURSEMENT

INTEROFFICE EMAIL REINCKENS TO LAM RE: SCHEDULING ORDER; MOTIONS TO BE FILED BY 1/31

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM REINCKENS RE: SCHEDULING ORDER; MOTIONS TO BE FILED BY 1/31

INTEROFFICE EMAIL AND DISCUSSION LAM TO REINCKENS RE: PROPOSED STATUS

INTEROFFICE EMAIL AND DISCUSSION LAM TO REINCKENS RE: PROPOSED STATUS; STATUS UNNECESSARY AT THIS TIME

INTEROFFICE EMAIL AND DISCUSSION REINCKENS TO LAM RE: PROPOSED STATUS

INTEROFFICE EMAIL AND DISCUSSION REINCKENS TO LAM RE: PROPOSED STATUS TO CLIENT

INTEROFFICE EMAIL AND DISCUSSION REINCKENS TO LAM RE: PROPOSED STATUS TO CLIENT; ADDITIONAL

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM AUBIN RE: JOINT PROTECTIVE ORDER, MEDIATOR CHOICE

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM CANDEE RE: SCHEDULING OF MEDIATION

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM CANDEE RE: SCHEDULING OF MEDIATION

INTEROFFICE EMAIL LAM TO AA*** RE: PACER INVOICES

INTEROFFICE EMAIL REINCKENS TO AA RE: PACER INVOICES

INTEROFFICE EMAIL REINCKENS TO LAM RE: BERKLEY'S JAN 31 06 FILINGS

INTEROFFICE EMAIL REINCKENS TO LAM RE: DOWNLOADING E-FILINGS

INTEROFFICE EMAIL REINCKENS TO LAM RE: NOTICE OF SELECTION OF MEDIATOR

INTEROFFICE EMAIL REINCKENS TO LAM RE: SSSI'S JAN 31 06 FILINGS

INTEROFFICE EMAIL REINCKENS TO LAM RE: TRANSAM & STANDARD'S JAN 31 06 FILINGS

OTHER TASK~

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Fri

Fri

Mon

Mon

Tue

Tue

Tue

Tue

Tue

Tue

Tue

Tue

Wed

Wed

Wed

Wed

Wed

Wed

Wed

DESCRIPTION

INFORMATIONAL

HOURS HOURS HOURSFEES EXH.

MBD 046

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 267-2 Filed 01/31/2008 Page 46 of 153

Page 47: Doc 267-2 - Example legal fees audit by Stuart, Maue, Mitchell & James legal fees auditing firm (rebuttal also uploaded)

Manziel Law OfficesALL 362 EMAIL TASKS

EXHIBIT E

~ See the last page of exhibit for explanation

STUART MAUE

EXHIBIT E PAGE 13 of 23

02/01/06

02/01/06

02/01/06

02/01/06

02/01/06

02/01/06

02/02/06

02/02/06

02/02/06

02/02/06

02/02/06

02/02/06

02/02/06

02/10/06

02/10/06

02/10/06

02/10/06

02/10/06

DATE

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

NAME

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.50

0.25

0.50

0.25

0.50

0.25

ENTRY

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.50

0.25

0.50

0.25

0.50

0.25

COMBINED

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

125.00

62.50

125.00

62.50

125.00

62.50

COMBINED

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

770

772

774

776

778

779

780

782

784

781

783

785

786

791

792

794

793

795

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM REINCKENS RE: BERKLEY'S JAN 31 06 FILINGS

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM REINCKENS RE: DOWNLOADING E-FILINGS

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM REINCKENS RE: NOTICE OF SELECTION OF MEDIATOR

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM REINCKENS RE: SSSI'S JAN 31 06 FILINGS

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM REINCKENS RE: TRANSAM & STANDARD'S JAN 31 06 FILINGS

LAM EMAIL TO AUBIN REQUESTING CONFIRMATION OF MEDIATION SCHEDULING

INTEROFFICE EMAIL REINCKENS TO LAM RE: MEDICAID REIMBURSEMENT REGULATIONS; ATTACHED

INTEROFFICE EMAIL REINCKENS TO LAM RE: QUESTION ON VASQUEZ SUPPLEMENTAL AFFIDAVIT

INTEROFFICE EMAIL REINCKENS TO LAM RE: VASQUEZ SUPPLEMENTAL AFFIDAVIT

LAM REV. EMAIL AND ATTACHMENT FROM REINCKENS TO LAM RE: MEDICAID REIMBURSEMENT REGULATIONS

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM REINCKENS RE: VASQUEZ SUPPLEMENTAL AFFIDAVIT; ANSWER

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM REINCKENS RE: VASQUEZ SUPPLEMENTAL AFFIDAVIT

LAM REV. EMAIL RESPONSE FROM AUBIN RE: MEDIATION SCHEDULING; REQUESTED DATE TENTATIVELY APPROVED, FINALCONFIRMATION TO FOLLOW

INTEROFFICE EMAIL LAM TO REINCKENS RE: MEDICAID REFUND ISSUE; REQUESTING REINCKENS TO PREP. PART OF BRIEF

INTEROFFICE EMAIL REINCKENS TO LAM RE: MEDICAID REFUND ISSUE

INTEROFFICE EMAIL REINCKENS TO LAM RE: STATUS OF MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM REINCKENS RE: MEDICAID REFUND ISSUE

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM REINCKENS TO LAM RE: STATUS OF MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

OTHER TASK~

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Wed

Wed

Wed

Wed

Wed

Wed

Thu

Thu

Thu

Thu

Thu

Thu

Thu

Fri

Fri

Fri

Fri

Fri

DESCRIPTION

INFORMATIONAL

HOURS HOURS HOURSFEES EXH.

MBD 047

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 267-2 Filed 01/31/2008 Page 47 of 153

Page 48: Doc 267-2 - Example legal fees audit by Stuart, Maue, Mitchell & James legal fees auditing firm (rebuttal also uploaded)

Manziel Law OfficesALL 362 EMAIL TASKS

EXHIBIT E

~ See the last page of exhibit for explanation

STUART MAUE

EXHIBIT E PAGE 14 of 23

02/10/06

02/13/06

02/13/06

02/13/06

02/13/06

02/13/06

02/13/06

02/13/06

02/14/06

02/14/06

02/16/06

02/16/06

02/16/06

02/16/06

02/16/06

02/16/06

02/16/06

02/16/06

DATE

Reinckens, J

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Reinckens, J

Reinckens, J

Attorney

Manziel, L

Assistant 1

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

NAME

0.50

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

ENTRY

0.50

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

COMBINED

125.00

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

COMBINED

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

796

797

799

801

800

802

798

803

804

805

812

806

808

810

807

809

811

813

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

REINCKENS EMAIL TO MR. BROADHURST RE: MEDICAID AFFIDAVIT; REQUESTING EXECUTED AFFIDAVIT

INTEROFFICE EMAIL LAM TO REINCKENS RE: PT. ACCT. NOTES [DOC # N/A]

INTEROFFICE EMAIL REINCKENS TO LAM RE: PT. ACCT. NOTES, ADDITIONAL [DOC # N/A]

INTEROFFICE EMAIL REINCKENS TO LAM RE: REPLY BRIEF FORMATTING

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM REINCKENS RE: PT. ACCT. NOTES, ADDITIONAL [DOC # N/A]

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM REINCKENS RE: REPLY BRIEF FORMATTING

REINCKENS REV. EMAIL FROM LAM RE: PT. ACCT. NOTES [DOC # N/A]

REINCKENS EMAIL TO MR. BROADHURST RE: ADDITION TO AFFIDAVIT

INTEROFFICE EMAIL REINCKENS TO LAM RE: RESPONSE BRIEF

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM REINCKENS RE: RESPONSE BRIEF

LA EMAIL TO LAM RE: CROSSON RESPONSE TO SALES 2ND MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

INTEROFFICE EMAIL REINCKENS TO LAM RE: CHANGES TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

INTEROFFICE EMAIL REINCKENS TO LAM RE: MINOR ADDITION TO CROSSON RESPONSE

INTEROFFICE EMAIL REINCKENS TO LAM RE: MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT RESPONSE; REINCKENS TO PREP. BRIEF ANDRESPONSE

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM REINCKENS RE: CHANGES TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM REINCKENS RE: MINOR ADDITION TO CROSSON RESPONSE

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM REINCKENS RE: MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT RESPONSE; REINCKENS TO PREP. BRIEF AND RESPONSE

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM LA RE: CROSSON RESPONSE TO SALES 2ND MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

OTHER TASK~

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Fri

Mon

Mon

Mon

Mon

Mon

Mon

Mon

Tue

Tue

Thu

Thu

Thu

Thu

Thu

Thu

Thu

Thu

DESCRIPTION

INFORMATIONAL

HOURS HOURS HOURSFEES EXH.

MBD 048

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 267-2 Filed 01/31/2008 Page 48 of 153

Page 49: Doc 267-2 - Example legal fees audit by Stuart, Maue, Mitchell & James legal fees auditing firm (rebuttal also uploaded)

Manziel Law OfficesALL 362 EMAIL TASKS

EXHIBIT E

~ See the last page of exhibit for explanation

STUART MAUE

EXHIBIT E PAGE 15 of 23

02/19/06

02/19/06

02/19/06

02/19/06

02/21/06

02/22/06

02/22/06

02/22/06

02/22/06

02/24/06

02/24/06

02/28/06

02/28/06

03/04/06

03/04/06

03/06/06

03/06/06

03/07/06

03/07/06

DATE

Attorney

Attorney

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Attorney

Attorney

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Attorney

Manziel, L

Attorney

Manziel, L

Attorney

Manziel, L

Attorney

Manziel, L

Attorney

Manziel, L

NAME

0.50

1.00

0.50

0.50

0.25

0.50

0.50

0.25

0.25

0.50

0.25

0.25

0.25

1.00

0.50

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

ENTRY

0.50

1.00

0.50

0.50

0.25

0.50

0.50

0.25

0.25

0.50

0.25

0.25

0.25

1.00

0.50

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

COMBINED

125.00

250.00

125.00

125.00

62.50

125.00

125.00

62.50

62.50

125.00

62.50

62.50

62.50

250.00

125.00

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

COMBINED

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

814

816

815

817

839

840

842

841

843

844

845

850

851

852

853

854

855

856

857

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

INTEROFFICE EMAIL REINCKENS TO LAM CONFIRMING RECEIPT OF EMAILS RE: CROSSON

INTEROFFICE EMAIL REINCKENS TO LAM RE: OBJECTIONS TO VASQUEZ AFFIDAVIT

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM REINCKENS CONFIRMING RECEIPT OF EMAILS RE: CROSSON

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM REINCKENS RE: OBJECTIONS TO VASQUEZ AFFIDAVIT

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM AUBIN RE: MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE RESPONSE; PROPOSED ORDER ATTACHED

INTEROFFICE EMAIL REINCKENS TO LAM RE: FILINGS AND OBJECTION TO VASQUEZ AFFIDAVIT; DOCUMENTS ATTACHED

INTEROFFICE EMAIL REINCKENS TO LAM RE: STATUS OF CROSSON FILINGS AND RESPONSE

LAM REV. EMAIL AND ATTACHMENT FROM REINCKENS RE: FILINGS AND OBJECTION TO VASQUEZ AFFIDAVIT

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM REINCKENS RE: STATUS OF CROSSON FILINGS AND RESPONSE

INTEROFFICE EMAIL REINCKENS TO LAM RE: FILINGS; DOCUMENTS ATTACHED

LAM REV. EMAIL AND ATTACHMENT FROM REINCKENS TO LAM RE: FILINGS

INTEROFFICE EMAIL REINCKENS TO LAM RE: QUESTION ON PLAN'S ASSIGNMENT TIMELINE

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM REINCKENS RE: QUESTION ON PLAN'S ASSIGNMENT TIMELINE

INTEROFFICE EMAIL AND DISCUSSION REINCKENS TO LAM RE: REPLY BRIEF, LATEST VERSION

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM REINCKENS RE: REPLY BRIEF, LATEST VERSION

INTEROFFICE EMAIL REINCKENS TO LAM RE: REPLY BRIEF, PDF FORMAT

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM REINCKENS RE: REPLY BRIEF, PDF FORMAT

INTEROFFICE EMAIL REINCKENS TO LAM RE: REPLY BRIEF, LATEST VERSION

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM REINCKENS RE: REPLY BRIEF, LATEST VERSION

OTHER TASK~

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Sun

Sun

Sun

Sun

Tue

Wed

Wed

Wed

Wed

Fri

Fri

Tue

Tue

Sat

Sat

Mon

Mon

Tue

Tue

DESCRIPTION

INFORMATIONAL

HOURS HOURS HOURSFEES EXH.

MBD 049

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 267-2 Filed 01/31/2008 Page 49 of 153

Page 50: Doc 267-2 - Example legal fees audit by Stuart, Maue, Mitchell & James legal fees auditing firm (rebuttal also uploaded)

Manziel Law OfficesALL 362 EMAIL TASKS

EXHIBIT E

~ See the last page of exhibit for explanation

STUART MAUE

EXHIBIT E PAGE 16 of 23

03/08/06

03/08/06

03/09/06

03/09/06

03/09/06

03/09/06

03/10/06

03/13/06

03/13/06

03/15/06

03/15/06

03/15/06

03/16/06

03/16/06

03/16/06

03/22/06

03/22/06

03/27/06

03/27/06

DATE

Attorney

Manziel, L

Attorney

Attorney

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Attorney

Attorney

Manziel, L

Attorney

Attorney

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Attorney

Attorney

NAME

0.50

0.25

0.50

0.50

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.50

0.50

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

ENTRY

0.50

0.25

0.50

0.50

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.50

0.50

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

COMBINED

125.00

62.50

125.00

125.00

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

125.00

125.00

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

COMBINED

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

870

871

872

874

873

875

876

877

878

883

884

885

886

887

888

889

890

891

893

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

INTEROFFICE EMAIL REINCKENS TO LAM RE: DOCUMENTS FILED TO DATE

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM REINCKENS RE: DOCUMENTS FILED TO DATE

INTEROFFICE EMAIL REINCKENS TO LAM RE: DOCUMENTS FILED TO DATE

INTEROFFICE EMAIL REINCKENS TO LAM RE: DOCUMENTS FILED TO DATE, ADDITIONAL

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM REINCKENS RE: DOCUMENTS FILED TO DATE

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM REINCKENS RE: DOCUMENTS FILED TO DATE, ADDITIONAL

LAM EMAIL TO CLIENT RE: MEDIATION DATE; REQUESTING CONFERENCE CALL

LAM REV. EMAIL RESPONSE FROM CLIENT RE: REQUEST FOR CONFERENCE CALL

LAM REV. EMAIL RESPONSE FROM CLIENT SCHEDULING CONFERENCE CALL

INTEROFFICE EMAIL AND DISCUSSION REINCKENS TO LAM RE: POST-HOC RATIONAL; CASE LAW

INTEROFFICE EMAIL REINCKENS TO LAM RE: E-FILINGS

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM REINCKENS RE: E-FILINGS

INTEROFFICE EMAIL AND DISCUSSION LAM TO REINCKENS RE: POST-HOC RATIONAL, CROSSON

INTEROFFICE EMAIL AND DISCUSSION REINCKENS TO LAM RE: POST-HOC RATIONAL; CASE LAW, ADDITIONAL

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM REINCKENS RE: POST-HOC RATIONAL; CASE LAW, ADDITIONAL

LAM EMAIL TO CLIENT CONFIRMING SCHEDULED CONFERENCE CALL

LAM REV. EMAIL RESPONSE FROM CLIENT; CONFIRMATION PROVIDED

INTEROFFICE EMAIL LAM TO REINCKENS RE: MEDIATION FEE

INTEROFFICE EMAIL REINCKENS TO LAM RE: MEDIATION FEE

OTHER TASK~

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Wed

Wed

Thu

Thu

Thu

Thu

Fri

Mon

Mon

Wed

Wed

Wed

Thu

Thu

Thu

Wed

Wed

Mon

Mon

DESCRIPTION

INFORMATIONAL

HOURS HOURS HOURSFEES EXH.

MBD 050

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 267-2 Filed 01/31/2008 Page 50 of 153

Page 51: Doc 267-2 - Example legal fees audit by Stuart, Maue, Mitchell & James legal fees auditing firm (rebuttal also uploaded)

Manziel Law OfficesALL 362 EMAIL TASKS

EXHIBIT E

~ See the last page of exhibit for explanation

STUART MAUE

EXHIBIT E PAGE 17 of 23

03/27/06

03/27/06

03/27/06

03/27/06

03/29/06

03/29/06

03/29/06

03/29/06

04/19/06

04/19/06

04/26/06

06/02/06

06/02/06

06/02/06

08/13/06

09/06/06

09/06/06

09/06/06

09/07/06

DATE

Attorney

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Reinckens, J

Attorney

Attorney

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Attorney

Manziel, L

Reinckens, J

Attorney

Manziel, L

Reinckens, J

Manziel, L

Attorney

Attorney

Manziel, L

Assistant 1

NAME

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.50

0.50

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.50

0.25

0.25

0.50

0.50

0.25

ENTRY

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.50

0.50

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.50

0.25

0.25

0.50

0.50

0.25

COMBINED

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

125.00

125.00

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

125.00

62.50

62.50

125.00

125.00

18.75

COMBINED

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

895

894

896

892

897

899

898

900

909

910

911

914

915

916

917

921

922

923

930

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

INTEROFFICE EMAIL REINCKENS TO LAM RE: MEDIATION FEE, RESPONSE

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM REINCKENS RE: MEDIATION FEE

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM REINCKENS RE: MEDIATION FEE, RESPONSE

REINCKENS REV. EMAIL FROM LAM RE: MEDIATION FEE

INTEROFFICE EMAIL REINCKENS TO LAM RE: E-FILINGS TO DATE

INTEROFFICE EMAIL REINCKENS TO LAM RE: E-FILINGS TO DATE, SECOND EMAIL

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM REINCKENS RE: E-FILINGS TO DATE

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM REINCKENS RE: E-FILINGS TO DATE, SECOND EMAIL

INTEROFFICE EMAIL REINCKENS TO LAM REQUESTING STATUS OF MEDIATION

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM REINCKENS RE: STATUS OF MEDIATION

REINCKENS EMAIL TO AUBIN RE: MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO MEDIATE

INTEROFFICE EMAIL REINCKENS TO LAM RE: STATUS UPDATE

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM REINCKENS RE: STATUS UPDATE

REINCKENS EMAIL TO MR. BROADHURST RE: STATUS UPDATE

LAM EMAIL TO AUBIN RE: SCHEDULING DEPOSITION; MATTERS TO BE INCLUDED IN DEPOSITION

INTEROFFICE EMAIL LAM TO REINCKENS RE: ORDER ON OBJECTIONS TO EVIDENCE

INTEROFFICE EMAIL REINCKENS TO LAM RE: EVIDENCE OBJECTIONS; DOCUMENTS ATTACHED

LAM REV. EMAIL AND ATTACHMENT FROM REINCKENS RE: EVIDENCE OBJECTIONS; DOCUMENTS ATTACHED

LA EMAIL TO CLIENT REQUESTING CONFERENCE CALL

OTHER TASK~

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Mon

Mon

Mon

Mon

Wed

Wed

Wed

Wed

Wed

Wed

Wed

Fri

Fri

Fri

Sun

Wed

Wed

Wed

Thu

DESCRIPTION

INFORMATIONAL

HOURS HOURS HOURSFEES EXH.

MBD 051

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 267-2 Filed 01/31/2008 Page 51 of 153

Page 52: Doc 267-2 - Example legal fees audit by Stuart, Maue, Mitchell & James legal fees auditing firm (rebuttal also uploaded)

Manziel Law OfficesALL 362 EMAIL TASKS

EXHIBIT E

~ See the last page of exhibit for explanation

STUART MAUE

EXHIBIT E PAGE 18 of 23

09/07/06

09/07/06

09/07/06

09/07/06

09/08/06

09/08/06

09/08/06

09/08/06

09/12/06

09/12/06

09/12/06

09/12/06

09/16/06

09/16/06

09/17/06

09/17/06

09/18/06

09/18/06

09/18/06

DATE

Attorney

Attorney

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Attorney

Attorney

Manziel, L

Reinckens, J

Attorney

Attorney

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Attorney

Manziel, L

Attorney

Manziel, L

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

NAME

0.25

0.75

0.25

0.50

0.25

0.75

0.50

0.25

0.50

0.75

0.50

0.25

0.75

0.50

0.50

0.25

0.25

0.50

0.25

ENTRY

0.25

0.75

0.25

0.50

0.25

0.75

0.50

0.25

0.50

0.75

0.50

0.25

0.75

0.50

0.50

0.25

0.25

0.50

0.25

COMBINED

62.50

187.50

62.50

125.00

62.50

187.50

125.00

62.50

125.00

187.50

125.00

62.50

187.50

125.00

125.00

62.50

62.50

125.00

62.50

COMBINED

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

926

928

927

929

931

933

934

932

935

937

936

938

939

940

941

942

946

948

950

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

INTEROFFICE EMAIL REINCKENS TO LAM RE: END CHARGES UNDER MEDICAID

INTEROFFICE EMAIL REINCKENS TO LAM RE: PRE-JUDGMENT INTEREST

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM REINCKENS RE: END CHARGES UNDER MEDICAID

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM REINCKENS RE: PRE-JUDGMENT INTEREST

INTEROFFICE EMAIL LAM TO REINCKENS RE: END CHARGES UNDER MEDICAID, QUESTION

INTEROFFICE EMAIL REINCKENS TO LAM RE: END CHARGES UNDER MEDICAID, RESPONSE PROVIDED

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM REINCKENS RE: END CHARGES UNDER MEDICAID, RESPONSE PROVIDED

REINCKENS REV. EMAIL FROM LAM RE: END CHARGES UNDER MEDICAID, QUESTION

INTEROFFICE EMAIL REINCKENS TO LAM RE: ISSUE, PREMIUM PAYMENTS

INTEROFFICE EMAIL REINCKENS TO LAM RE: ADDITIONAL ISSUE, PREMIUM PAYMENTS

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM REINCKENS RE: ISSUE, PREMIUM PAYMENTS

LAM REV. EMAIL REINCKENS RE: ADDITIONAL ISSUE, PREMIUM PAYMENTS

INTEROFFICE EMAIL REINCKENS TO LAM RE: BRIEF ON MOTION TO AMEND

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM REINCKENS RE: BRIEF ON MOTION TO AMEND

INTEROFFICE EMAIL REINCKENS TO LAM RE: CROSSON AND PACIFICARE NOTICE

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM REINCKENS RE: CROSSON AND PACIFICARE NOTICE

INTEROFFICE EMAIL LAM TO REINCKENS RE: ORDER AND STATUS OF COURT'S COURTESY COPIES

INTEROFFICE EMAIL REINCKENS TO LAM RE: CROSSON AND PACIFICARE NOTICE

INTEROFFICE EMAIL REINCKENS TO LAM RE: ORDER AND STATUS OR COURT'S COURTESY COPIES; UPDATE PROVIDED

OTHER TASK~

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Thu

Thu

Thu

Thu

Fri

Fri

Fri

Fri

Tue

Tue

Tue

Tue

Sat

Sat

Sun

Sun

Mon

Mon

Mon

DESCRIPTION

INFORMATIONAL

HOURS HOURS HOURSFEES EXH.

MBD 052

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 267-2 Filed 01/31/2008 Page 52 of 153

Page 53: Doc 267-2 - Example legal fees audit by Stuart, Maue, Mitchell & James legal fees auditing firm (rebuttal also uploaded)

Manziel Law OfficesALL 362 EMAIL TASKS

EXHIBIT E

~ See the last page of exhibit for explanation

STUART MAUE

EXHIBIT E PAGE 19 of 23

09/18/06

09/18/06

09/18/06

09/18/06

09/18/06

09/19/06

09/19/06

09/20/06

09/20/06

09/27/06

09/27/06

09/27/06

09/27/06

10/09/06

10/09/06

10/10/06

10/10/06

10/10/06

10/10/06

DATE

Attorney

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Reinckens, J

Attorney

Reinckens, J

Attorney

Manziel, L

Attorney

Attorney

Manziel, L

Reinckens, J

Attorney

Manziel, L

Attorney

Attorney

Reinckens, J

Reinckens, J

NAME

0.50

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.50

0.25

0.25

0.50

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

ENTRY

0.50

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.50

0.25

0.25

0.50

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

COMBINED

125.00

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

125.00

62.50

62.50

125.00

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

COMBINED

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

952

949

951

953

947

954

955

956

957

959

961

962

960

966

967

970

972

971

973

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

INTEROFFICE EMAIL REINCKENS TO LAM RE: RECONSIDER BRIEF; DOCUMENT ATTACHED

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM REINCKENS RE: CROSSON AND PACIFICARE NOTICE

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM REINCKENS RE: ORDER AND STATUS OR COURT'S COURTESY COPIES; UPDATE PROVIDED

LAM REV. EMAIL AND ATTACHMENT FROM REINCKENS RE: RECONSIDER BRIEF

REINCKENS REV. EMAIL FROM LAM RE: ORDER AND STATUS OF COURT'S COURTESY COPIES

INTEROFFICE EMAIL LAM TO REINCKENS RE: COURT'S COURTESY COPIES; CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE

REINCKENS REV. EMAIL FROM LAM RE: COURT'S COURTESY COPIES; CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE

INTEROFFICE EMAIL REINCKENS TO LAM RE: CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM REINCKENS RE: CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE

INTEROFFICE EMAIL LAM TO REINCKENS REQUESTING ORDERS FROM COURT

INTEROFFICE EMAIL REINCKENS TO LAM RE: ORDER; DOCUMENT ATTACHED

LAM REV. EMAIL AND ATTACHMENT FROM REINCKENS RE: ORDER

REINCKENS REV. EMAIL FROM LAM RE: ORDERS FROM COURT

INTEROFFICE EMAIL REINCKENS TO LAM RE: STATUS OF E-FILING

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM REINCKENS RE: STATUS OF E-FILING

INTEROFFICE EMAIL LAM TO REINCKENS RE: E-FILING REPLY TIME; REQUESTING CONFIRMATION

INTEROFFICE EMAIL LAM TO REINCKENS RE: STATUS OF E-FILING; QUESTION ON TIMELINESS

REINCKENS REV. EMAIL FROM LAM RE: E-FILING REPLY TIME; REQUESTING CONFIRMATION

REINCKENS REV. EMAIL FROM LAM RE: STATUS OF E-FILING; QUESTION ON TIMELINESS

OTHER TASK~

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Mon

Mon

Mon

Mon

Mon

Tue

Tue

Wed

Wed

Wed

Wed

Wed

Wed

Mon

Mon

Tue

Tue

Tue

Tue

DESCRIPTION

INFORMATIONAL

HOURS HOURS HOURSFEES EXH.

MBD 053

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 267-2 Filed 01/31/2008 Page 53 of 153

Page 54: Doc 267-2 - Example legal fees audit by Stuart, Maue, Mitchell & James legal fees auditing firm (rebuttal also uploaded)

Manziel Law OfficesALL 362 EMAIL TASKS

EXHIBIT E

~ See the last page of exhibit for explanation

STUART MAUE

EXHIBIT E PAGE 20 of 23

10/11/06

10/11/06

10/11/06

10/11/06

10/11/06

10/11/06

10/19/06

10/23/06

10/26/06

10/26/06

10/26/06

10/26/06

10/26/06

10/26/06

10/26/06

10/26/06

10/26/06

10/26/06

DATE

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Reinckens, J

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

NAME

0.25

0.75

0.25

0.50

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.50

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

ENTRY

0.25

0.75

0.25

0.50

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.50

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

COMBINED

62.50

187.50

62.50

125.00

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

125.00

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

COMBINED

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

974

976

978

977

979

975

980

982

983

985

987

989

988

990

991

992

993

994

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

INTEROFFICE EMAIL LAM TO REINCKENS RE: RESPONSE TO MOTION TO RECONSIDER; REQUESTING REINCKENS TO PREPAREMOTION TO STRIKE DEFENDAN

INTEROFFICE EMAIL REINCKENS TO LAM RE: E-FILING REPLY TIME; ANSWER PROVIDED

INTEROFFICE EMAIL REINCKENS TO LAM RE: MOTION TO STRIKE DEFENDANTS' RESPONSE

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM REINCKENS RE: E-FILING REPLY TIME; ANSWER PROVIDED

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM REINCKENS RE: MOTION TO STRIKE DEFENDANTS' RESPONSE

REINCKENS REV. EMAIL FROM LAM RE: RESPONSE TO MOTION TO RECONSIDER; REQUESTING TO PREPARE MOTION TO STRIKEDEFENDANTS' RESPONSE

LAM EMAIL TO AUBIN RE: MOTION TO SET-ASIDE

LAM REV. EMAIL RESPONSE FROM AUBIN RE; MOTION TO SET-ASIDE; AUBIN IN AGREEMENT

INTEROFFICE EMAIL LAM TO REINCKENS RE: MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION; ""FINAL JUDGME

INTEROFFICE EMAIL LAM TO REINCKENS RE: MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION; QUESTION RE: ""FINAL JUDGME

INTEROFFICE EMAIL REINCKENS TO LAM RE: MOTION FOR FEES

INTEROFFICE EMAIL REINCKENS TO LAM RE: MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION; RESPONSE PROVIDED

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM REINCKENS RE: MOTION FOR FEES

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM REINCKENS RE: MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION; RESPONSE PROVIDED

LAM EMAIL TO AUBIN RE: REVISED MOTION TO SET-ASIDE; REQUESTING CONFERENCE CALL

LAM EMAIL TO AUBIN RE: SCHEDULED CONFERENCE CALL; PHONE NO. PROVIDED

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM AUBIN RE: SCHEDULED CONFERENCE CALL

LAM REV. EMAIL RESPONSE FROM AUBIN RE: MOTION TO SET-ASIDE; CONFIRMING CONFERENCE CALL

OTHER TASK~

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Wed

Wed

Wed

Wed

Wed

Wed

Thu

Mon

Thu

Thu

Thu

Thu

Thu

Thu

Thu

Thu

Thu

Thu

DESCRIPTION

INFORMATIONAL

HOURS HOURS HOURSFEES EXH.

MBD 054

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 267-2 Filed 01/31/2008 Page 54 of 153

Page 55: Doc 267-2 - Example legal fees audit by Stuart, Maue, Mitchell & James legal fees auditing firm (rebuttal also uploaded)

Manziel Law OfficesALL 362 EMAIL TASKS

EXHIBIT E

~ See the last page of exhibit for explanation

STUART MAUE

EXHIBIT E PAGE 21 of 23

10/26/06

10/26/06

10/27/06

10/27/06

10/27/06

10/27/06

10/31/06

10/31/06

04/30/07

12/21/07

12/28/07

01/02/08

01/03/08

01/07/08

01/09/08

DATE

Reinckens, J

Reinckens, J

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

NAME

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.50

0.25

0.25

0.25

ENTRY

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.50

0.25

0.25

0.25

COMBINED

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

125.00

62.50

62.50

62.50

COMBINED

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

984

986

995

996

997

998

1002

1003

1008

1013

1016

1017

1018

1020

1021

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

REINCKENS REV. EMAIL FROM LAM RE: MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION; ""FINAL JUDGME

REINCKENS REV. EMAIL FROM LAM RE: MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION; QUESTION RE: ""FINAL JUDGME

LAM EMAIL TO AUBIN REQUESTING STATUS OF MOTION

LAM EMAIL TO AUBIN REQUESTING UPDATE ON STATUS OF MOTION

LAM REV. EMAIL RESPONSE FROM AUBIN RE: STATUS OF MOTION; AUBIN TO CHECK WITH CANDEE AND WHITAKER

LAM REV. EMAIL RESPONSE FROM AUBIN RE: STATUS OF MOTION; PER AUBIN, CANDEE NOT OPPOSED; NO RESPONSE FROMWHITAKER; AUBIN TO COMPLE

LAM EMAIL TO AUBIN RE: UPDATED STATUS OF MOTION

LAM REV. EMAIL RESPONSE FROM AUBIN RE: UPDATED STATUS OF MOTION; UPDATE PROVIDED TO LA

LAM EMAIL TO AUBIN RE: ANY POSSIBLE SETTLEMENT OF CASE

12/21/2007 - LAM EMAIL TO AUBIN RE: CONFER RE: ATTORNEY FEES; 12/26/2007 - LAM DISCUSSION W/AUBIN RE: CONFER RE:ATTORNEY FEES AND

12/28/2007 - LAM EMAIL TO AUBIN RE: MOTION FOR ATTORNEY FEES; 12/28/2007 - LAM REV. EMAIL FROM AUBIN RE: MOTION FORATTORNEY FEES;

1/2/2008 - LAM S/W AUBIN RE: MOTION FOR ATTORNEY FEES; 1/2/2008 - LAM EMAIL TO AUBIN RE: CONFER RE: ATTORNEY FEES;1/2/2008 - LAM

1/3/2008 - LAM EMAIL TO AUBIN RE: CONFER RE: ATTORNEY FEES; 1/4/2008 - LAM S/W AUBIN RE: MOTION FOR ATTORNEY FEES;1/7/2008 - LAM

1/7/2008 - LAM REV. EMAIL FROM AUBIN RE: STIPULATING AS TO AMOUNT ON ATTORNEY FEES; 1/9/2008 - LAM S/W AUBIN RE:STIPULATING AS TO

1/9/2008 - LAM REV. EMAIL FROM AUBIN RE: STIPULATING AS TO AMOUNT ON ATTORNEY FEES

OTHER TASK~

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Thu

Thu

Fri

Fri

Fri

Fri

Tue

Tue

Mon

Fri

Fri

Wed

Thu

Mon

Wed

DESCRIPTION

INFORMATIONAL

HOURS HOURS HOURSFEES EXH.

MBD 055

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 267-2 Filed 01/31/2008 Page 55 of 153

Page 56: Doc 267-2 - Example legal fees audit by Stuart, Maue, Mitchell & James legal fees auditing firm (rebuttal also uploaded)

Manziel Law OfficesALL 362 EMAIL TASKS

EXHIBIT E

STUART MAUE

EXHIBIT E PAGE 22 of 23

114.50 $28,143.75

DATE NAMEENTRY COMBINED COMBINED

Total

OTHER TASK~ DESCRIPTION

INFORMATIONAL

HOURS HOURS HOURSFEES EXH.

Number of Entries: 362

MBD 056

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 267-2 Filed 01/31/2008 Page 56 of 153

Page 57: Doc 267-2 - Example legal fees audit by Stuart, Maue, Mitchell & James legal fees auditing firm (rebuttal also uploaded)

Manziel Law OfficesALL 362 EMAIL TASKS

EXHIBIT E

STUART MAUE

EXHIBIT E PAGE 23 of 23

Assistant 1AttorneyManziel, LReinckens, J

TIMEKEEPER HOURS FEES HOURS FEES HOURS FEES HOURS FEES HOURS FEESISOLATED BLOCKED MAXIMUM PROPORTIONAL COMBINED

(~) REASONS FOR TASK HOUR ASSIGNMENTS

114.50 $28,143.75 0.00 $0.00 114.50 $28,143.75 0.00 $0.00 114.50 $28,143.75

3.00 39.00 64.25 8.25

268.75 9,750.00

16,062.50 2,062.50

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.00 39.00 64.25 8.25

268.75 9,750.00

16,062.50 2,062.50

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.00 39.00 64.25 8.25

268.75 9,750.00

16,062.50 2,062.50

RANGE OF HOURS

RANGE OF FEES

SUMMARY OF HOURS AND FEES BY INDIVIDUAL

MBD 057

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 267-2 Filed 01/31/2008 Page 57 of 153

Page 58: Doc 267-2 - Example legal fees audit by Stuart, Maue, Mitchell & James legal fees auditing firm (rebuttal also uploaded)

Manziel Law OfficesTASKS FOR APRIL 21, 2005 EMAILS

EXHIBIT F

STUART MAUE

EXHIBIT F PAGE 1 of 3

Manziel, L

HOURS FEESTIMEKEEPER

0.75 187.50

0.75 $187.50

COMBINED COMBINED

MBD 058

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 267-2 Filed 01/31/2008 Page 58 of 153

Page 59: Doc 267-2 - Example legal fees audit by Stuart, Maue, Mitchell & James legal fees auditing firm (rebuttal also uploaded)

Manziel Law OfficesTASKS FOR APRIL 21, 2005 EMAILS

EXHIBIT F

~ See the last page of exhibit for explanation

STUART MAUE

EXHIBIT F PAGE 2 of 3

0.75 $187.50

04/21/05

04/22/05

04/22/05

DATE

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

NAME

0.25

0.25

0.25

ENTRY

0.25

0.25

0.25

COMBINED

62.50

62.50

62.50

COMBINED

01

01

01

663

664

667

Total

1

1

1

LAM EMAIL TO WHITAKER RE: JOINT MOTION TO WAIVE ORAL ARGUMENT; REQUESTING WHITAKER TO ADVISE ASAP

LAM EMAIL TO AUBIN RE: JOINT MOTION TO WAIVE ORAL ARGUMENT; CHANGE TO BE MADE

LAM REV. EMAIL RESPONSE FROM AUBIN RE: JOINT MOTION TO WAIVE ORAL ARGUMENT; AUBIN REQUESTING CHANGE

OTHER TASK~

/

/

/

Thu

Fri

Fri

DESCRIPTION

INFORMATIONAL

HOURS HOURS HOURSFEES EXH.

Number of Entries: 3

MBD 059

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 267-2 Filed 01/31/2008 Page 59 of 153

Page 60: Doc 267-2 - Example legal fees audit by Stuart, Maue, Mitchell & James legal fees auditing firm (rebuttal also uploaded)

Manziel Law OfficesTASKS FOR APRIL 21, 2005 EMAILS

EXHIBIT F

STUART MAUE

EXHIBIT F PAGE 3 of 3

Manziel, LTIMEKEEPER HOURS FEES HOURS FEES HOURS FEES HOURS FEES HOURS FEES

ISOLATED BLOCKED MAXIMUM PROPORTIONAL COMBINED

(~) REASONS FOR TASK HOUR ASSIGNMENTS

0.75 $187.50 0.00 $0.00 0.75 $187.50 0.00 $0.00 0.75 $187.50

0.75 187.50 0.00 0.00 0.75 187.50 0.00 0.00 0.75 187.50

RANGE OF HOURS

RANGE OF FEES

SUMMARY OF HOURS AND FEES BY INDIVIDUAL

MBD 060

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 267-2 Filed 01/31/2008 Page 60 of 153

Page 61: Doc 267-2 - Example legal fees audit by Stuart, Maue, Mitchell & James legal fees auditing firm (rebuttal also uploaded)

EXHIBIT G – Emails of April 21, 2005 -----Original Message----- From: Aubin, Richard E. Sent: Friday, April 22, 2005 10:28 AM To: 'Lisa A. Manziel'; [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Subject: RE: Waiver of Oral Argument

Lisa, This looks fine to me, but I would ask that you make one change: from: The issues presented amongst Appellees and Third-Party Defendants were rendered moot by the District Court and likewise involve questions of law. to: The issues presented amongst Appellees and Third-Party Defendants involve claims ruled moot by the District Court and likewise involve questions of law. Thanks, Rich Richard E. Aubin Vial, Hamilton, Koch & Knox, L.L.P. 1700 Pacific Avenue, Suite 2800 Dallas, Texas 75201-4632 214-712-4400 - Phone 214-712-4402 - Fax

There is no professional relationship of any kind between Robert G. Vial and Vial, Hamilton, Koch & Knox, L.L.P.

This e-mail may contain privileged communications. If you are not an intended recipient, please immediately delete or destroy all copies or versions you have of this message and notify the sender at 214-712-4400 or [email protected] so that I may take

steps to prevent any further disclosures. -----Original Message----- From: Lisa A. Manziel [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2005 4:33 PM To: [email protected] Cc: Aubin, Richard E.; [email protected] Subject: Waiver of Oral Argument

Dear Andrew:

MBD 061

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 267-2 Filed 01/31/2008 Page 61 of 153

Page 62: Doc 267-2 - Example legal fees audit by Stuart, Maue, Mitchell & James legal fees auditing firm (rebuttal also uploaded)

Per your request, attached is the proposed motion. Please advise as soon as possible. I would like to get this in the mail tomorrow if at all possible. Thank all of you for your time and assistance. Lisa. Lisa A. Manziel Manziel Law Offices 8330 Meadow Road, Suite 100 Dallas, Texas 75231 214.369.5500 214.369.6123 Fax CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS FACSIMILE MESSAGE IS ATTORNEY PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION INTENDED ONLY FOR THE USE FOR THE INDIVIDUAL OR ENTITY NAMED ABOVE. IF THE READER OF THIS MESSAGE IS NOT THE INTENDED RECIPIENT, YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT ANY DISSEMINATION, DISTRIBUTION OR COPYING OF THIS COMMUNICATION IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. IF YOU HAVE RECEIVED THIS COMMUNICATION IN ERROR, PLEASE IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THIS FIRM BY TELEPHONE, AND RETURN THE ORIGINAL MESSAGE TO THIS FIRM AT THE ABOVE ADDRESS VIA U.S. MAIL. THANK YOU!

MBD 062

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 267-2 Filed 01/31/2008 Page 62 of 153

Page 63: Doc 267-2 - Example legal fees audit by Stuart, Maue, Mitchell & James legal fees auditing firm (rebuttal also uploaded)

Manziel Law OfficesTASKS FOR OCTOBER 26, 2006 EMAILS

EXHIBIT H

STUART MAUE

EXHIBIT H PAGE 1 of 3

Manziel, L

HOURS FEESTIMEKEEPER

0.50 125.00

0.50 $125.00

COMBINED COMBINED

MBD 063

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 267-2 Filed 01/31/2008 Page 63 of 153

Page 64: Doc 267-2 - Example legal fees audit by Stuart, Maue, Mitchell & James legal fees auditing firm (rebuttal also uploaded)

Manziel Law OfficesTASKS FOR OCTOBER 26, 2006 EMAILS

EXHIBIT H

~ See the last page of exhibit for explanation

STUART MAUE

EXHIBIT H PAGE 2 of 3

0.50 $125.00

10/26/06

10/26/06

DATE

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

NAME

0.25

0.25

ENTRY

0.25

0.25

COMBINED

62.50

62.50

COMBINED

01

01

991

994

Total

1

1

LAM EMAIL TO AUBIN RE: REVISED MOTION TO SET-ASIDE; REQUESTING CONFERENCE CALL

LAM REV. EMAIL RESPONSE FROM AUBIN RE: MOTION TO SET-ASIDE; CONFIRMING CONFERENCE CALL

OTHER TASK~

/

/

Thu

Thu

DESCRIPTION

INFORMATIONAL

HOURS HOURS HOURSFEES EXH.

Number of Entries: 2

MBD 064

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 267-2 Filed 01/31/2008 Page 64 of 153

Page 65: Doc 267-2 - Example legal fees audit by Stuart, Maue, Mitchell & James legal fees auditing firm (rebuttal also uploaded)

Manziel Law OfficesTASKS FOR OCTOBER 26, 2006 EMAILS

EXHIBIT H

STUART MAUE

EXHIBIT H PAGE 3 of 3

Manziel, LTIMEKEEPER HOURS FEES HOURS FEES HOURS FEES HOURS FEES HOURS FEES

ISOLATED BLOCKED MAXIMUM PROPORTIONAL COMBINED

(~) REASONS FOR TASK HOUR ASSIGNMENTS

0.50 $125.00 0.00 $0.00 0.50 $125.00 0.00 $0.00 0.50 $125.00

0.50 125.00 0.00 0.00 0.50 125.00 0.00 0.00 0.50 125.00

RANGE OF HOURS

RANGE OF FEES

SUMMARY OF HOURS AND FEES BY INDIVIDUAL

MBD 065

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 267-2 Filed 01/31/2008 Page 65 of 153

Page 66: Doc 267-2 - Example legal fees audit by Stuart, Maue, Mitchell & James legal fees auditing firm (rebuttal also uploaded)

EXHIBIT I – Emails of October 26, 2006 -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 10:17 AM To: Lisa A. Manziel Subject: Re: Revised Motion to Set- Aside Lisa, I'll look at it and email you if it is agreeable. Otherwise 2:00 should work for me (better than 1:30) Richard Aubin Vial Hamilton *** sent via Blackberry *** -----Original Message----- From: "Lisa A. Manziel" <[email protected]> Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2006 10:02:44 To:<[email protected]> Cc:"'Rick Reinckens'" <[email protected]> Subject: Revised Motion to Set- Aside Dear Rich: Attached is a revised Motion to Set-Aside. Is this acceptable to you? If not, are you available for a conference call today at 1:30 P.M.? If not, when are you available today? Thanks, Lisa. Lisa A. Manziel MANZIEL LAW OFFICES 8330 Meadow Road, Suite 100 Dallas, TX 75231-3767 214-369-5500; Fax 214-369-6123

MBD 066

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 267-2 Filed 01/31/2008 Page 66 of 153

Page 67: Doc 267-2 - Example legal fees audit by Stuart, Maue, Mitchell & James legal fees auditing firm (rebuttal also uploaded)

************************************************************************ **** *** CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail transmission, including any attachments, is intended only for the use of the individual(s) and organization(s) named above and may contain information that is CONFIDENTIAL, PRIVILEGED and/or EXEMPT FROM DISCLOSURE under state or federal law, including attorney-client privilege or HIPAA. If you are not an intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of any of the information contained in this transmission is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. If you received this communication in error, immediately notify Manziel Law Offices at 214-369-5500 and delete the message. ************************************************************************ **** **** ########################################### This message has been scanned by F-Secure Anti-Virus for Microsoft Exchange. For more information, connect to http://www.f-secure.com/

MBD 067

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 267-2 Filed 01/31/2008 Page 67 of 153

Page 68: Doc 267-2 - Example legal fees audit by Stuart, Maue, Mitchell & James legal fees auditing firm (rebuttal also uploaded)

Manziel Law OfficesTASKS FOR OCTOBER 27, 2006 EMAILS

EXHIBIT J

STUART MAUE

EXHIBIT J PAGE 1 of 3

Manziel, L

HOURS FEESTIMEKEEPER

0.50 125.00

0.50 $125.00

COMBINED COMBINED

MBD 068

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 267-2 Filed 01/31/2008 Page 68 of 153

Page 69: Doc 267-2 - Example legal fees audit by Stuart, Maue, Mitchell & James legal fees auditing firm (rebuttal also uploaded)

Manziel Law OfficesTASKS FOR OCTOBER 27, 2006 EMAILS

EXHIBIT J

~ See the last page of exhibit for explanation

STUART MAUE

EXHIBIT J PAGE 2 of 3

0.50 $125.00

10/27/06

10/27/06

DATE

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

NAME

0.25

0.25

ENTRY

0.25

0.25

COMBINED

62.50

62.50

COMBINED

01

01

995

997

Total

1

1

LAM EMAIL TO AUBIN REQUESTING STATUS OF MOTION

LAM REV. EMAIL RESPONSE FROM AUBIN RE: STATUS OF MOTION; AUBIN TO CHECK WITH CANDEE AND WHITAKER

OTHER TASK~

/

/

Fri

Fri

DESCRIPTION

INFORMATIONAL

HOURS HOURS HOURSFEES EXH.

Number of Entries: 2

MBD 069

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 267-2 Filed 01/31/2008 Page 69 of 153

Page 70: Doc 267-2 - Example legal fees audit by Stuart, Maue, Mitchell & James legal fees auditing firm (rebuttal also uploaded)

Manziel Law OfficesTASKS FOR OCTOBER 27, 2006 EMAILS

EXHIBIT J

STUART MAUE

EXHIBIT J PAGE 3 of 3

Manziel, LTIMEKEEPER HOURS FEES HOURS FEES HOURS FEES HOURS FEES HOURS FEES

ISOLATED BLOCKED MAXIMUM PROPORTIONAL COMBINED

(~) REASONS FOR TASK HOUR ASSIGNMENTS

0.50 $125.00 0.00 $0.00 0.50 $125.00 0.00 $0.00 0.50 $125.00

0.50 125.00 0.00 0.00 0.50 125.00 0.00 0.00 0.50 125.00

RANGE OF HOURS

RANGE OF FEES

SUMMARY OF HOURS AND FEES BY INDIVIDUAL

MBD 070

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 267-2 Filed 01/31/2008 Page 70 of 153

Page 71: Doc 267-2 - Example legal fees audit by Stuart, Maue, Mitchell & James legal fees auditing firm (rebuttal also uploaded)

EXHIBIT K - Emails of October 27, 2006 ----- Original Message ----- From: <[email protected]> To: "Lisa A. Manziel" <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, October 27, 2006 11:07 AM Subject: Re: Call Lisa, As of yesterday evening I had not heard back from Bob or Andrew. I'm on my way back from a hearing in county court and will check on this first thing. Rich Richard Aubin Vial Hamilton *** sent via Blackberry *** -----Original Message----- From: "Lisa A. Manziel" <[email protected]> Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 10:58:35 To:<[email protected]> Subject: RE: Call Rich, What is the status of the motion? Lisa. -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 1:48 PM To: Lisa A. Manziel Subject: Call Lisa, I am running a few minutes behind and will call you at about 2:15.

MBD 071

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 267-2 Filed 01/31/2008 Page 71 of 153

Page 72: Doc 267-2 - Example legal fees audit by Stuart, Maue, Mitchell & James legal fees auditing firm (rebuttal also uploaded)

Rich Richard Aubin Vial Hamilton *** sent via Blackberry *** ########################################### This message has been scanned by F-Secure Anti-Virus for Microsoft Exchange. For more information, connect to http://www.f-secure.com/ ########################################### This message has been scanned by F-Secure Anti-Virus for Microsoft Exchange. For more information, connect to http://www.f-secure.com/

MBD 072

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 267-2 Filed 01/31/2008 Page 72 of 153

Page 73: Doc 267-2 - Example legal fees audit by Stuart, Maue, Mitchell & James legal fees auditing firm (rebuttal also uploaded)

Manziel Law OfficesREVIEW OF ORDERS - UNIT BILLING 0.15

EXHIBIT L

STUART MAUE

EXHIBIT L PAGE 1 of 5

Attorney

HOURS FEESTIMEKEEPER

5.85 1,462.50

5.85 $1,462.50

COMBINED COMBINED

MBD 073

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 267-2 Filed 01/31/2008 Page 73 of 153

Page 74: Doc 267-2 - Example legal fees audit by Stuart, Maue, Mitchell & James legal fees auditing firm (rebuttal also uploaded)

Manziel Law OfficesREVIEW OF ORDERS - UNIT BILLING 0.15

EXHIBIT L

~ See the last page of exhibit for explanation

STUART MAUE

EXHIBIT L PAGE 2 of 5

07/03/01

10/26/01

11/20/01

02/14/02

02/27/02

03/01/02

05/02/02

06/11/02

08/28/02

08/29/02

09/25/02

10/16/02

10/17/02

11/04/02

11/20/02

11/21/02

11/22/02

12/03/02

12/06/02

DATE

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

NAME

0.15

0.15

0.15

0.15

0.15

0.15

0.15

0.15

0.15

0.15

0.15

0.15

0.15

0.15

0.15

0.15

0.15

0.15

0.15

ENTRY

0.15

0.15

0.15

0.15

0.15

0.15

0.15

0.15

0.15

0.15

0.15

0.15

0.15

0.15

0.15

0.15

0.15

0.15

0.15

COMBINED

37.50

37.50

37.50

37.50

37.50

37.50

37.50

37.50

37.50

37.50

37.50

37.50

37.50

37.50

37.50

37.50

37.50

37.50

37.50

COMBINED

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

5

17

21

26

28

32

45

66

146

151

205

257

262

290

331

337

340

371

375

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

REVIEW OF ORDER REQUIRING AMENDED COMPLAINT [DOC# 004]

REVIEW OF INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER [DOC# 009]

REVIEW OF ORDER TO JOIN THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANTS [DOC# 012]

REVIEW OF ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR STANDARD SECURITY TO ANSWER [DOC# 019]

REVIEW OF AGREED ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR TRANSAMERICA LIFE TO ANSWER [DOC# 021]

REVIEW OF AGREED ORDER EXTENDING BERKLEY'S ANSWER DATE [DOC# 024]

REVIEW OF ORDER APPOINTING MEDIATOR JOHN SEWELL [DOC# 030]

REVIEW OF AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER [DOC# 032]

REVIEW OF ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO FILE SECOND AMENDED ORIGINAL PETITION [DOC# 041]

REVIEW OF ORDER FOR LEAVE TO SUBSTITUTE AFFIDAVIT (COST AND NECESSITY) [DOC# 043]

REVIEW OF ORDER GRANTING SALES MOTION TO AMEND THIRD-PARTY COMPLAINT [DOC# 052]

REVIEW OF ORDER ALLOWING BERKLEY TO FILE THIRD-PARTY COUNTERCLAIM [DOC# 061]

REVIEW OF ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR SALES TO RESPOND TO STANDARD'S AND TRANSAMERICA'S MSJ #1 [DOC# 063]

REVIEW OF ORDER BRIEFLY EXTENDING CERTAIN PRE-TRIAL DEADLINES [DOC# 068]

REVIEW OF ORDER REFERRING MOTION TO COMPEL TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE [DOC# 071]

REVIEW OF ORDER GRANTING HARRIS PROTECTIVE ORDER, QUASHING DEPOSITION NOTICES, DENYING SANCTIONS [DOC# 072]

REVIEW OF ORDER DENYING SALES PROTECTIVE ORDER, GRANTING SALES MOTION TO COMPEL [DOC# 073]

REVIEW OF ORDER DENYING HARRIS' AND SALES' REQUESTS FOR SANCTIONS ON SALES' MOTION TO COMPEL [DOC# 076]

REVIEW OF ORDER SETTING DEPOSITION [DOC# 077]

OTHER TASK~

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Tue

Fri

Tue

Thu

Wed

Fri

Thu

Tue

Wed

Thu

Wed

Wed

Thu

Mon

Wed

Thu

Fri

Tue

Fri

DESCRIPTION

INFORMATIONAL

HOURS HOURS HOURSFEES EXH.

MBD 074

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 267-2 Filed 01/31/2008 Page 74 of 153

Page 75: Doc 267-2 - Example legal fees audit by Stuart, Maue, Mitchell & James legal fees auditing firm (rebuttal also uploaded)

Manziel Law OfficesREVIEW OF ORDERS - UNIT BILLING 0.15

EXHIBIT L

~ See the last page of exhibit for explanation

STUART MAUE

EXHIBIT L PAGE 3 of 5

12/18/02

03/06/03

05/02/03

05/14/03

07/03/03

11/13/03

12/22/03

04/19/04

05/20/04

10/07/04

11/19/04

12/10/04

05/02/05

12/16/05

02/08/06

02/21/06

09/28/06

09/29/06

DATE

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

NAME

0.15

0.15

0.15

0.15

0.15

0.15

0.15

0.15

0.15

0.15

0.15

0.15

0.15

0.15

0.15

0.15

0.15

0.15

ENTRY

0.15

0.15

0.15

0.15

0.15

0.15

0.15

0.15

0.15

0.15

0.15

0.15

0.15

0.15

0.15

0.15

0.15

0.15

COMBINED

37.50

37.50

37.50

37.50

37.50

37.50

37.50

37.50

37.50

37.50

37.50

37.50

37.50

37.50

37.50

37.50

37.50

37.50

COMBINED

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

02

02

02

02

01

01

01

01

01

401

504

534

548

567

573

583

613

620

110

170

220

270

712

788

819

963

964

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

REVIEW OF ORDER EXTENDING SALES' TIME TO RESPOND TO SECURITY'S MSJ, AND ORDER UNFILING TRANSAMERICA'S MSJ [DOC#078]

REVIEW OF ORDER GRANTING THIRD-PARTY LITIGANTS' MOTION TO EXTEND DISCOVERY DEADLINE FOR ADDITIONAL DEPOSITIONS[DOC# 100]

REVIEW OF ORDER GRANTING SALES' MOTION TO FILE SECOND MSJ (RE INSURERS) [DOC# 124]

REVIEW OF ORDER EXTENDING THIRD-PARTY SUMMARY JUDGMENT BRIEFING AND RESPONSE SCHEDULE [DOC# 126]

REVIEW OF ORDER ALLOWING BERKLEY TO SUPPLEMENT SUMMARY JUDGMENT RECORD [DOC# 143]

REVIEW OF ORDER FOR TRIAL-SETTING CONFERENCE [DOC# 151]

REVIEW OF ORDER ON MOTION TO POSTPONE [DOC# 153]

REVIEW OF ORDER EXTENDING SALES' TIME TO RESPOND TO HARRIS' MOTION TO VACATE [DOC# 160]

REVIEW OF ORDER ON HARRIS' MOTION TO ALTER JUDGMENT [DOC# 163]

REVIEW OF ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR SALES TO FILE CONSOLIDATED BRIEF

REVIEW OF ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR TRANSAMERICA AND STANDARD TO FILE BRIEF

REVIEW OF ORDER ALLOWING SALES TO FILE CONSOLIDATED REPLY/BRIEF IN THIRD-PARTY APPEAL

REVIEW OF ORDER WAIVING ORAL ARGUMENT

REVIEW OF SCHEDULING ORDER [DOC# 175]

REVIEW OF ORDER APPOINTING MEDIATOR (RIP PARKER) [DOC# 191]

REVIEW OF ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND [DOC# 193]

REVIEW OF ORDER STRIKING SSSI'S ANSWER TO BERKLEY'S COUNTERCLAIM [DOC# 230]

REVIEW OF ORDER GRANTING BERKLEY'S MSJ V SALES [DOC# 231]

OTHER TASK~

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Wed

Thu

Fri

Wed

Thu

Thu

Mon

Mon

Thu

Thu

Fri

Fri

Mon

Fri

Wed

Tue

Thu

Fri

DESCRIPTION

INFORMATIONAL

HOURS HOURS HOURSFEES EXH.

MBD 075

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 267-2 Filed 01/31/2008 Page 75 of 153

Page 76: Doc 267-2 - Example legal fees audit by Stuart, Maue, Mitchell & James legal fees auditing firm (rebuttal also uploaded)

Manziel Law OfficesREVIEW OF ORDERS - UNIT BILLING 0.15

EXHIBIT L

~ See the last page of exhibit for explanation

STUART MAUE

EXHIBIT L PAGE 4 of 5

5.85 $1,462.50

10/03/06

11/09/06

DATE

Attorney

Attorney

NAME

0.15

0.15

ENTRY

0.15

0.15

COMBINED

37.50

37.50

COMBINED

01

01

965

1006

Total

1

1

REVIEW OF ORDER FOR TRIAL-SETTING CONFERENCE [DOC# 232]

REVIEW OF ORDER SETTING ASIDE TRIAL-SETTING CONFERENCE [DOC# 238]

OTHER TASK~

/

/

Tue

Thu

DESCRIPTION

INFORMATIONAL

HOURS HOURS HOURSFEES EXH.

Number of Entries: 39

MBD 076

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 267-2 Filed 01/31/2008 Page 76 of 153

Page 77: Doc 267-2 - Example legal fees audit by Stuart, Maue, Mitchell & James legal fees auditing firm (rebuttal also uploaded)

Manziel Law OfficesREVIEW OF ORDERS - UNIT BILLING 0.15

EXHIBIT L

STUART MAUE

EXHIBIT L PAGE 5 of 5

AttorneyTIMEKEEPER HOURS FEES HOURS FEES HOURS FEES HOURS FEES HOURS FEES

ISOLATED BLOCKED MAXIMUM PROPORTIONAL COMBINED

(~) REASONS FOR TASK HOUR ASSIGNMENTS

5.85 $1,462.50 0.00 $0.00 5.85 $1,462.50 0.00 $0.00 5.85 $1,462.50

5.85 1,462.50 0.00 0.00 5.85 1,462.50 0.00 0.00 5.85 1,462.50

RANGE OF HOURS

RANGE OF FEES

SUMMARY OF HOURS AND FEES BY INDIVIDUAL

MBD 077

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 267-2 Filed 01/31/2008 Page 77 of 153

Page 78: Doc 267-2 - Example legal fees audit by Stuart, Maue, Mitchell & James legal fees auditing firm (rebuttal also uploaded)

Manziel Law OfficesTRUNCATED ENTRIES

EXHIBIT M

STUART MAUE

EXHIBIT M PAGE 1 of 7

AssistantAssistant 1AttorneyManziel, LReinckens, J

HOURS FEESTIMEKEEPER

6.00 1.00

23.00 6.25 1.00

450.00 75.00

5,750.00 1,562.50

250.00

37.25 $8,087.50

COMBINED COMBINED

MBD 078

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 267-2 Filed 01/31/2008 Page 78 of 153

Page 79: Doc 267-2 - Example legal fees audit by Stuart, Maue, Mitchell & James legal fees auditing firm (rebuttal also uploaded)

Manziel Law OfficesTRUNCATED ENTRIES

EXHIBIT M

~ See the last page of exhibit for explanation

STUART MAUE

EXHIBIT M PAGE 2 of 7

04/10/02

05/11/02

08/18/02

08/18/02

08/19/02

08/23/02

08/23/02

09/11/02

09/11/02

09/24/02

09/27/02

10/08/02

10/16/02

10/23/02

DATE

Attorney

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Assistant

Attorney

Assistant

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Attorney

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

NAME

1.50

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.50

1.50

0.25

0.50

0.25

0.25

1.00

0.25

0.25

ENTRY

1.50

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.50

1.50

0.25

0.50

0.25

0.25

1.00

0.25

0.25

COMBINED

375.00

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

37.50

375.00

18.75

125.00

62.50

62.50

250.00

62.50

62.50

COMBINED

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

39

49

121

122

124

136

135

180

179

203

217

227

259

276

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANTS TRANSAM'S AND STANDARD SECURITY'S FIRST SET OF REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTSTO DEFENDANTS, TO DEFEN

LAM REV. LETTER TO WHITAKER FROM AUBIN RE: DEFENDANT'S RESPONSES AND OBJECTIONS TO TRANSAM'S AND STANDARDSECURITY'S FIRST SET OF

LAM EMAIL TO AUBIN RE: POSITION ON FILING PLAINTIFFS AMENDED SECOND AMENDED ORIGINAL PETITION; PLAINTIFFS MOTIONFOR LEAVE TO FI

LAM EMAIL TO WHITAKER RE: POSITION ON FILING PLAINTIFFS AMENDED SECOND AMENDED ORIGINAL PETITION; PLAINTIFFSMOTION FOR LEAVE TO

LAM REV. LETTER FROM AUBIN RE: PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED SECOND AMENDED ORIGINAL PETITION ANDPROPOSED PLAINTIF

PLAINTIFF'S FIRST REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION TO DEFENDANTS, TO DEFENDANTS SSSI EMPLOYEE HEALTH CARE PLAN AND SSSI,TRANSAM, STANDARD S

PLAINTIFF'S FIRST REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION TO DEFENDANTS, TO DEFENDANTS SSSI EMPLOYEE HEALTH CARE PLAN AND SSSI,TRANSAM, STANDARD S

LAM LETTER TO AUBIN RE: MEDICAL RECORDS, DOCUMENTS; PLAINTIFF'S SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSES TO DEFENDANTS'REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTI

LAM LETTER TO AUBIN RE: MEDICAL RECORDS, DOCUMENTS; PLAINTIFF'S SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSES TO DEFENDANTS'REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTI

LAM REV. LETTER FROM CANDEE RE: THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT BERKLEY'S OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES TO PLAINTIFF'S FIRSTREQUEST FOR ADMISSIO

LAM REV. LETTER FROM AUBIN RE: DEFENDANTS' OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES TO PLAINTIFF'S FIRST SET OF REQUESTS FORPRODUCTION AND DOCUME

THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANTS TRANSAM'S AND STANDARD SECURITY'S FIRST SET OF REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTSTO THIRD-PARTY DEFENDAN

LAM EMAIL TO AUBIN AND CANDEE RE: PLAINTIFFS FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES TO DEFENDANTS AND PLAINTIFFS FIRST SET OFINTERROGATOR

LAM EMAIL TO AUBIN RE: SCHEDULED DEPOSITION OF SSSI, KAREN HERMANN; REQUESTING CONFIRMATION OF INTENTION TORESPOND TO DISCOVERY;

OTHER TASK~

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Wed

Sat

Sun

Sun

Mon

Fri

Fri

Wed

Wed

Tue

Fri

Tue

Wed

Wed

DESCRIPTION

INFORMATIONAL

HOURS HOURS HOURSFEES EXH.

MBD 079

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 267-2 Filed 01/31/2008 Page 79 of 153

Page 80: Doc 267-2 - Example legal fees audit by Stuart, Maue, Mitchell & James legal fees auditing firm (rebuttal also uploaded)

Manziel Law OfficesTRUNCATED ENTRIES

EXHIBIT M

~ See the last page of exhibit for explanation

STUART MAUE

EXHIBIT M PAGE 3 of 7

10/28/02

11/06/02

11/13/02

11/15/02

11/15/02

11/19/02

11/19/02

12/06/02

12/06/02

12/06/02

12/06/02

12/28/02

01/02/03

01/07/03

DATE

Attorney

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Attorney

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Assistant

Assistant

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

NAME

0.50

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

1.00

2.00

3.00

3.25

1.50

0.25

0.25

ENTRY

0.50

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

1.00

2.00

3.00

3.25

1.50

0.25

0.25

COMBINED

125.00

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

75.00

150.00

750.00

812.50

375.00

62.50

62.50

COMBINED

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

282

293

303

315

309

326

327

379

381

378

380

417

435

444

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

DEFENDANT'S OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES TO PLAINTIFF'S NOTICE OF INTENTION TO TAKE ORAL DEPOSITION AND SUBPOENADUCES TECUM, FROM DEF

LAM REV. LETTER FROM WHITAKER REQUESTING DATES FOR DEPOSITION OF VARIOUS HARRIS WITNESSES, CHERYLE CHAFFIN,LOIS ELAINE DAVIS, A.

LAM REV. LETTER FROM WHITAKER REQUESTING DATES FOR DEPOSITION OF VARIOUS HARRIS WITNESSES, CHERYLE CHAFFIN,LOIS ELAINE DAVIS, A.

NOTICE OF INTENTION TO TAKE DEPOSITIONS OF JACK ROPER, VICKI SAYLOR, CORDELL MUSCH, LINDA POWELL, DIANE BROWN, ANDJILL KRAATZ, BY

LAM LETTER TO AUBIN RE: PLAINTIFF'S OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES TO DEFENDANTS' FIRST REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS, TODEFENDANTS' SECOND RE

LAM REV. LETTER FROM AUBIN RE: TOPICS OF DEPOSITION; RESCHEDULING DEPOSITIONS OF VARIOUS PERSONS IDENTIFIED BYINITIALS IN PT. ACC

LAM REV. LETTER TO WHITAKER FROM AUBIN RE: SCHEDULING DEPOSITIONS; AUBIN TO WITHDRAW NOTICES OF DEPOSITION FORTRANSAM AND STANDAR

THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT BERKLEY'S OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES TO THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANTS TRANSAM'S AND STANDARDSECURITY'S FIRST SET OF

THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT BERKLEY'S OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES TO THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANTS TRANSAM'S AND STANDARDSECURITY'S FIRST SET OF

THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT BERKLEY'S OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES TO THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANTS TRANSAM'S AND STANDARDSECURITY'S FIRST SET OF

THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT BERKLEY'S OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES TO THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANTS TRANSAM'S AND STANDARDSECURITY'S FIRST SET OF

THE EXCESS-LOSS INSURER'S MOTION TO COMPEL AND FOR SANCTIONS, FILED BY THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANTS TRANSAM ANDSTANDARD SECURITY AGAINS

LAM LETTER TO WHITAKER RE: SCHEDULING DEPOSITIONS OF CHAFFIN, DAVIS, NIEMAN, REYNOLDS, CUNNINGHAM AND UNKNOWNPERSONS IDENTIFIED B

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM CLIENT RE: REQUEST FOR WITNESS INFO.; INFORMATION PROVIDED WITH RESPECT TO PERSONS IDENTIFIEDBY INITIALS IN P

OTHER TASK~

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Mon

Wed

Wed

Fri

Fri

Tue

Tue

Fri

Fri

Fri

Fri

Sat

Thu

Tue

DESCRIPTION

INFORMATIONAL

HOURS HOURS HOURSFEES EXH.

MBD 080

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 267-2 Filed 01/31/2008 Page 80 of 153

Page 81: Doc 267-2 - Example legal fees audit by Stuart, Maue, Mitchell & James legal fees auditing firm (rebuttal also uploaded)

Manziel Law OfficesTRUNCATED ENTRIES

EXHIBIT M

~ See the last page of exhibit for explanation

STUART MAUE

EXHIBIT M PAGE 4 of 7

01/17/03

01/17/03

01/17/03

01/20/03

01/22/03

01/31/03

02/04/03

02/04/03

02/12/03

02/12/03

02/14/03

02/14/03

02/15/03

02/20/03

DATE

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Manziel, L

NAME

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.50

0.25

0.25

1.00

0.75

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

ENTRY

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.50

0.25

0.25

1.00

0.75

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

COMBINED

62.50

62.50

62.50

125.00

62.50

62.50

250.00

187.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

COMBINED

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

446

447

449

453

455

463

464

465

468

469

471

472

474

477

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

NOTICE TO TAKE DEPOSITION OF KATHRYN INGENITO, BY THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT STANDARD SECURITY TO DEFENDANTS SSSLAND THIRD-PARTY DEFEN

NOTICE TO TAKE DEPOSITION OF JUDIE GOODLIFFE, BY THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT STANDARD SECURITY TO DEFENDANTS SSSL ANDTHIRD-PARTY DEFEND

NOTICE TO TAKE DEPOSITION OF WILLIAM GRENKER, BY THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT STANDARD SECURITY TO DEFENDANTS SSSI ANDTHIRD-PARTY DEFEND

THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT STANDARD SECURITY'S OBJECTIONS TO NOTICE OF INTENTION TO TAKE THE DEPOSITION OF ACORPORATE REPRESENTATIVE,

LAM REV. LETTER TO AUBIN FROM MR. JUBINSKY RE: THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT STANDARD SECURITY'S OBJECTIONS TO NOTICE OFINTENTION TO TAKE

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM CLIENT RE: REQUEST FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF AFFIDAVITS RELATED TO MOTION FOR SUMMARYJUDGEMENT; RESPONSES PR

THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANTS TRANSAM'S AND STANDARD SECURITY'S SECOND SET OF REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTSTO DEFENDANTS, TO DEFE

THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANTS TRANSAM'S AND STANDARD SECURITY'S SECOND SET OF REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTSTO THIRD-PARTY DEFENDA

AMENDED NOTICE TO TAKE DEPOSITION OF STEPHEN DUNSTON, BY THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT STANDARD SECURITY TODEFENDANTS SSSI AND THIRD-PART

AMENDED NOTICE TO TAKE DEPOSITION OF DONNA STONE, BY THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT TRANSAM TO DEFENDANTS SSSI ANDTHIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT BE

NOTICE TO TAKE DEPOSITION OF CHERYLE CHAFFIN, BY THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT TRANSAM TO DEFENDANTS SSSI AND THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT BERKLE

NOTICE TO TAKE DEPOSITION OF LOIS ELAINE DAVIS, BY THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT STANDARD SECURITY TO DEFENDANTS SSSI ANDTHIRD-PARTY DEFE

NOTICE OF INTENTION TO TAKE THE DEPOSITION OF A CORPORATE REPRESENTATIVE OF TRANSAM, BY DEFENDANT SSSI, ON02/21/2002 [MISTYPED DO

LAM REV. LETTER FROM WHITAKER RE: THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT TRANSAM'S OBJECTIONS TO NOTICE OF INTENTION TO TAKE THEDEPOSITION OF A CO

OTHER TASK~

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Fri

Fri

Fri

Mon

Wed

Fri

Tue

Tue

Wed

Wed

Fri

Fri

Sat

Thu

DESCRIPTION

INFORMATIONAL

HOURS HOURS HOURSFEES EXH.

MBD 081

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 267-2 Filed 01/31/2008 Page 81 of 153

Page 82: Doc 267-2 - Example legal fees audit by Stuart, Maue, Mitchell & James legal fees auditing firm (rebuttal also uploaded)

Manziel Law OfficesTRUNCATED ENTRIES

EXHIBIT M

~ See the last page of exhibit for explanation

STUART MAUE

EXHIBIT M PAGE 5 of 7

02/24/03

03/03/03

03/03/03

03/03/03

03/03/03

03/06/03

04/09/03

04/16/03

12/15/03

05/04/04

06/16/04

11/23/05

10/11/06

10/19/06

10/26/06

10/26/06

DATE

Attorney

Assistant

Assistant

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Assistant 1

Assistant 1

Reinckens, J

Attorney

Reinckens, J

Attorney

Manziel, L

Attorney

Attorney

NAME

0.25

0.75

1.50

0.75

2.50

1.50

0.25

0.50

0.50

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.50

0.25

0.25

ENTRY

0.25

0.75

1.50

0.75

2.50

1.50

0.25

0.50

0.50

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.50

0.25

0.25

COMBINED

62.50

56.25

112.50

187.50

625.00

375.00

62.50

37.50

37.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

125.00

62.50

62.50

COMBINED

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

479

492

494

491

493

505

519

523

575

617

626

711

974

981

983

985

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT TRANSAM'S OBJECTIONS TO NOTICE OF INTENTION TO TAKE THE DEPOSITION OF A CORPORATEREPRESENTATIVE, BY DEFENDA

THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT BERKLEY'S OBJECTIONS TO NOTICE TO TAKE DEPOSITION, BY THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT TRANSAM

THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT BERKLEY'S OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES TO THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANTS TRANSAM'S AND STANDARDSECURITY'S SECOND SET OF

THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT BERKLEY'S OBJECTIONS TO NOTICE TO TAKE DEPOSITION, BY THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT TRANSAM

THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT BERKLEY'S OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES TO THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANTS TRANSAM'S AND STANDARDSECURITY'S SECOND SET OF

DEFENDANTS RESPONSES AND OBJECTIONS TO TRANSAM'S AND STANDARD SECURITY'S SECOND SET OF REQUESTS FORPRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS; LAM R

NOTICE TO TAKE DEPOSITION OF CHRISTOPHER SILLITO, BY THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT TRANSAM, TO DEFENDANTS SSSL ANDTHIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT B

LA S/W GLORIA, MERIT COURT REPORTERS RE: STATUS OF BRENDA CROSSON DEPOSITION.; PARTY THAT PAYS FOR DEPOSITIONSIS CUSTODIAN OF ORI

LA S/W CANDEE RE: AGREED MOTION TO CANCEL PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE AND PRE-TRIAL ORDER OF SUBMISSION; CANDEE TOPREPARE MOTION FOR REV

REINCKENS S/W DEPUTY CLERK FW DIV. OF NORTHERN DISTRICT RE: STATUS OF CASES IN FED. COURT; 24HRS FOR CLERK'S OFFICETO SCAN AND DO

INTEROFFICE EMAIL REINCKENS TO LAM RE: STATUS OF APPEAL NOTICE; CLERK'S OFFICE ACCESSES SAME INTERNET-BASEDSYSTEM COUNSEL CAN ACC

REINCKENS EMAIL TO WHITAKER RE: JOINT STATUS REPORT; REQUESTED LANGUAGE INCLUDED; REQUESTING AUTHORIZATION FORELECTRONIC SIGNATUR

INTEROFFICE EMAIL LAM TO REINCKENS RE: RESPONSE TO MOTION TO RECONSIDER; REQUESTING REINCKENS TO PREPAREMOTION TO STRIKE DEFENDAN

LAM S/W MS. SMALLING AND ""CHERYL"" RE: ORDER SETTING PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE; MOTION TO SET-A

INTEROFFICE EMAIL LAM TO REINCKENS RE: MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION; ""FINAL JUDGME

INTEROFFICE EMAIL LAM TO REINCKENS RE: MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION; QUESTION RE: ""FINAL JUDGME

OTHER TASK~

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Mon

Mon

Mon

Mon

Mon

Thu

Wed

Wed

Mon

Tue

Wed

Wed

Wed

Thu

Thu

Thu

DESCRIPTION

INFORMATIONAL

HOURS HOURS HOURSFEES EXH.

MBD 082

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 267-2 Filed 01/31/2008 Page 82 of 153

Page 83: Doc 267-2 - Example legal fees audit by Stuart, Maue, Mitchell & James legal fees auditing firm (rebuttal also uploaded)

Manziel Law OfficesTRUNCATED ENTRIES

EXHIBIT M

~ See the last page of exhibit for explanation

STUART MAUE

EXHIBIT M PAGE 6 of 7

37.25 $8,087.50

10/26/06

10/26/06

10/27/06

12/21/07

01/07/08

DATE

Reinckens, J

Reinckens, J

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

NAME

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

ENTRY

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

COMBINED

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

COMBINED

01

01

01

01

01

984

986

998

1013

1020

Total

1

1

1

1

1

REINCKENS REV. EMAIL FROM LAM RE: MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION; ""FINAL JUDGME

REINCKENS REV. EMAIL FROM LAM RE: MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION; QUESTION RE: ""FINAL JUDGME

LAM REV. EMAIL RESPONSE FROM AUBIN RE: STATUS OF MOTION; PER AUBIN, CANDEE NOT OPPOSED; NO RESPONSE FROMWHITAKER; AUBIN TO COMPLE

12/21/2007 - LAM EMAIL TO AUBIN RE: CONFER RE: ATTORNEY FEES; 12/26/2007 - LAM DISCUSSION W/AUBIN RE: CONFER RE:ATTORNEY FEES AND

1/7/2008 - LAM REV. EMAIL FROM AUBIN RE: STIPULATING AS TO AMOUNT ON ATTORNEY FEES; 1/9/2008 - LAM S/W AUBIN RE:STIPULATING AS TO

OTHER TASK~

/

/

/

/

/

Thu

Thu

Fri

Fri

Mon

DESCRIPTION

INFORMATIONAL

HOURS HOURS HOURSFEES EXH.

Number of Entries: 63

MBD 083

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 267-2 Filed 01/31/2008 Page 83 of 153

Page 84: Doc 267-2 - Example legal fees audit by Stuart, Maue, Mitchell & James legal fees auditing firm (rebuttal also uploaded)

Manziel Law OfficesTRUNCATED ENTRIES

EXHIBIT M

STUART MAUE

EXHIBIT M PAGE 7 of 7

AssistantAssistant 1AttorneyManziel, LReinckens, J

TIMEKEEPER HOURS FEES HOURS FEES HOURS FEES HOURS FEES HOURS FEESISOLATED BLOCKED MAXIMUM PROPORTIONAL COMBINED

(~) REASONS FOR TASK HOUR ASSIGNMENTS

37.25 $8,087.50 0.00 $0.00 37.25 $8,087.50 0.00 $0.00 37.25 $8,087.50

6.00 1.00

23.00 6.25 1.00

450.00 75.00

5,750.00 1,562.50

250.00

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

6.00 1.00

23.00 6.25 1.00

450.00 75.00

5,750.00 1,562.50

250.00

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

6.00 1.00

23.00 6.25 1.00

450.00 75.00

5,750.00 1,562.50

250.00

RANGE OF HOURS

RANGE OF FEES

SUMMARY OF HOURS AND FEES BY INDIVIDUAL

MBD 084

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 267-2 Filed 01/31/2008 Page 84 of 153

Page 85: Doc 267-2 - Example legal fees audit by Stuart, Maue, Mitchell & James legal fees auditing firm (rebuttal also uploaded)

Manziel Law OfficesATTORNEY & ASSISTANT BOTH BILL

EXHIBIT N

STUART MAUE

EXHIBIT N PAGE 1 of 18

AssistantAttorneyManziel, L

HOURS FEESTIMEKEEPER

491.25 1,352.15

81.75

36,843.75 338,037.50 20,437.50

1,925.15 $395,318.75

COMBINED COMBINED

MBD 085

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 267-2 Filed 01/31/2008 Page 85 of 153

Page 86: Doc 267-2 - Example legal fees audit by Stuart, Maue, Mitchell & James legal fees auditing firm (rebuttal also uploaded)

Manziel Law OfficesATTORNEY & ASSISTANT BOTH BILL

EXHIBIT N

~ See the last page of exhibit for explanation

STUART MAUE

EXHIBIT N PAGE 2 of 18

06/29/01

06/29/01

06/29/01

06/29/01

08/09/01

08/09/01

08/16/01

08/16/01

09/19/01

09/19/01

01/07/02

01/07/02

02/27/02

02/27/02

06/17/02

06/17/02

06/18/02

06/18/02

DATE

Assistant

Assistant

Attorney

Attorney

Assistant

Attorney

Assistant

Attorney

Assistant

Attorney

Assistant

Manziel, L

Assistant

Attorney

Assistant

Attorney

Assistant

Attorney

NAME

5.50

0.50

14.00

1.00

0.50

2.50

0.25

0.50

0.50

2.50

1.25

0.50

0.25

1.00

8.00

8.00

2.50

2.00

ENTRY

5.50

0.50

14.00

1.00

0.50

2.50

0.25

0.50

0.50

2.50

1.25

0.50

0.25

1.00

8.00

8.00

2.50

2.00

COMBINED

412.50

37.50

3,500.00

250.00

37.50

625.00

18.75

125.00

37.50

625.00

93.75

125.00

18.75

250.00

600.00

2,000.00

187.50

500.00

COMBINED

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

2

4

1

3

8

7

10

9

16

15

24

23

30

29

72

71

74

73

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

RESEARCH AND PREPARATION OF HARRIS' ORIGINAL COMPLAINT [DOC# 001]

RESEARCH AND PREPARATION OF HARRIS' CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS [DOC# 002]

RESEARCH AND PREPARATION OF HARRIS' ORIGINAL COMPLAINT [DOC# 001]

RESEARCH AND PREPARATION OF HARRIS' CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS [DOC# 002]

REVIEW OF SALES' ANSWER TO COMPLAINT [DOC# 006]

REVIEW OF SALES' ANSWER TO COMPLAINT [DOC# 006]

PLAINTIFFS REQUEST FOR DISCLOSURE PURSUANT TO RULE 194.2; TO DEFENDANT, SSSI EMPLOYEE HEALTH CARE PLAN, THROUGHAUBIN

PLAINTIFFS REQUEST FOR DISCLOSURE PURSUANT TO RULE 194.2; TO DEFENDANT, SSSI EMPLOYEE HEALTH CARE PLAN, THROUGHAUBIN

RESEARCH AND PREPARATION OF JOINT STATUS REPORT AND PROPOSED DISCOVERY PLAN [DOC# 008]

RESEARCH AND PREPARATION OF JOINT STATUS REPORT AND PROPOSED DISCOVERY PLAN [DOC# 008]

LAM S/W AUBIN AND PREPARED LETTER RE: RULE 11 AGREEMENT BETWEEN HARRIS AND SSSI TO EXTEND HARRIS'

LAM S/W AUBIN AND PREPARED LETTER RE: RULE 11 AGREEMENT BETWEEN HARRIS AND SSSI TO EXTEND HARRIS'

REVIEW OF STANDARD SECURITY LIFE'S 3RD PARTY ANSWER [DOC# 022]

REVIEW OF STANDARD SECURITY LIFE'S 3RD PARTY ANSWER [DOC# 022]

PLAINTIFF HARRIS INITIAL WRITTEN DISCLOSURES, RULE 26(A)

PLAINTIFF HARRIS INITIAL WRITTEN DISCLOSURES, RULE 26(A)

PLAINTIFF HARRIS INITIAL WRITTEN DISCLOSURES, RULE 26(A)

PLAINTIFF HARRIS INITIAL WRITTEN DISCLOSURES, RULE 26(A)

OTHER TASK~

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Fri

Fri

Fri

Fri

Thu

Thu

Thu

Thu

Wed

Wed

Mon

Mon

Wed

Wed

Mon

Mon

Tue

Tue

DESCRIPTION

INFORMATIONAL

HOURS HOURS HOURSFEES EXH.

MBD 086

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 267-2 Filed 01/31/2008 Page 86 of 153

Page 87: Doc 267-2 - Example legal fees audit by Stuart, Maue, Mitchell & James legal fees auditing firm (rebuttal also uploaded)

Manziel Law OfficesATTORNEY & ASSISTANT BOTH BILL

EXHIBIT N

~ See the last page of exhibit for explanation

STUART MAUE

EXHIBIT N PAGE 3 of 18

06/25/02

06/25/02

07/31/02

07/31/02

08/06/02

08/06/02

08/07/02

08/07/02

08/08/02

08/08/02

08/15/02

08/15/02

08/16/02

08/16/02

08/23/02

08/23/02

08/28/02

DATE

Assistant

Attorney

Assistant

Attorney

Assistant

Manziel, L

Assistant

Manziel, L

Assistant

Attorney

Assistant

Attorney

Assistant

Manziel, L

Assistant

Attorney

Assistant

NAME

2.00

8.00

2.00

3.75

7.00

7.00

6.00

6.00

7.50

7.50

2.50

6.75

0.50

3.50

0.50

1.50

4.00

ENTRY

2.00

8.00

2.00

3.75

7.00

7.00

6.00

6.00

7.50

7.50

2.50

6.75

0.50

3.50

0.50

1.50

4.00

COMBINED

150.00

2,000.00

150.00

937.50

525.00

1,750.00

450.00

1,500.00

562.50

1,875.00

187.50

1,687.50

37.50

875.00

37.50

375.00

300.00

COMBINED

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

78

77

95

94

101

100

103

102

106

105

113

112

118

117

136

135

149

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

PREPARATION FOR DEPOSITION OF JILL KRAATZ

PREPARATION FOR DEPOSITION OF JILL KRAATZ

REVIEW OF SALES' MOTION TO COMPEL AGAINST HARRIS [DOC# 033]

REVIEW OF SALES' MOTION TO COMPEL AGAINST HARRIS [DOC# 033]

LAM REV. RULE 26(A) DISCLOSURES OF TRANSAM

LAM REV. RULE 26(A) DISCLOSURES OF TRANSAM

LAM REV. RULE 26(A) DISCLOSURES OF TRANSAM

LAM REV. RULE 26(A) DISCLOSURES OF TRANSAM

REV. OF TRANSAM DISCLOSED DOCUMENTS

REV. OF TRANSAM DISCLOSED DOCUMENTS

RESEARCH AND PREPARATION OF HARRIS' RESPONSE TO SALES' MOTION TO COMPEL [DOC# 035]

RESEARCH AND PREPARATION OF HARRIS' RESPONSE TO SALES' MOTION TO COMPEL [DOC# 035]

LAM LETTER TO AUBIN REQUESTING DEPOSITION DATES; TOPICS OF DEPOSITION

LAM LETTER TO AUBIN REQUESTING DEPOSITION DATES; TOPICS OF DEPOSITION

PLAINTIFF'S FIRST REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION TO DEFENDANTS, TO DEFENDANTS SSSI EMPLOYEE HEALTH CARE PLAN AND SSSI,TRANSAM, STANDARD S

PLAINTIFF'S FIRST REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION TO DEFENDANTS, TO DEFENDANTS SSSI EMPLOYEE HEALTH CARE PLAN AND SSSI,TRANSAM, STANDARD S

HARRIS' SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSES TO DEFENDANTS' FIRST SET OF REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION TO HARRIS, TO DEFENDANTSSSI

OTHER TASK~

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Tue

Tue

Wed

Wed

Tue

Tue

Wed

Wed

Thu

Thu

Thu

Thu

Fri

Fri

Fri

Fri

Wed

DESCRIPTION

INFORMATIONAL

HOURS HOURS HOURSFEES EXH.

MBD 087

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 267-2 Filed 01/31/2008 Page 87 of 153

Page 88: Doc 267-2 - Example legal fees audit by Stuart, Maue, Mitchell & James legal fees auditing firm (rebuttal also uploaded)

Manziel Law OfficesATTORNEY & ASSISTANT BOTH BILL

EXHIBIT N

~ See the last page of exhibit for explanation

STUART MAUE

EXHIBIT N PAGE 4 of 18

08/28/02

08/30/02

08/30/02

09/07/02

09/07/02

09/08/02

09/08/02

09/09/02

09/09/02

09/10/02

09/10/02

09/10/02

09/10/02

09/11/02

09/11/02

09/11/02

09/11/02

DATE

Attorney

Assistant

Attorney

Assistant

Manziel, L

Assistant

Manziel, L

Assistant

Attorney

Assistant

Assistant

Attorney

Manziel, L

Assistant

Assistant

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

NAME

7.50

0.25

2.00

4.00

8.50

8.00

9.00

2.00

3.00

0.25

4.00

4.50

0.50

8.50

0.25

8.50

0.50

ENTRY

7.50

0.25

2.00

4.00

8.50

8.00

9.00

2.00

3.00

0.25

4.00

4.50

0.50

8.50

0.25

8.50

0.50

COMBINED

1,875.00

18.75

500.00

300.00

2,125.00

600.00

2,250.00

150.00

750.00

18.75

300.00

1,125.00

125.00

637.50

18.75

2,125.00

125.00

COMBINED

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

148

158

157

167

166

169

168

171

170

174

176

175

173

178

180

177

179

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

HARRIS' SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSES TO DEFENDANTS' FIRST SET OF REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION TO HARRIS, TO DEFENDANTSSSI

REVIEW OF SALES' REPLY TO HARRIS' RESPONSE TO SALES' MOTION TO COMPEL [DOC# 044]

REVIEW OF SALES' REPLY TO HARRIS' RESPONSE TO SALES' MOTION TO COMPEL [DOC# 044]

LAM REV. & PREPARE HARRIS RULE 26(A) DISCLOSURES

LAM REV. & PREPARE HARRIS RULE 26(A) DISCLOSURES

LAM REV. & PREPARE HARRIS RULE 26(A) DISCLOSURES

LAM REV. & PREPARE HARRIS RULE 26(A) DISCLOSURES

NOTICE OF INTENTION TO TAKE ORAL DEPOSITION AND SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM, BY PLAINTIFF TO DEFENDANT SSSI, ON 09/25/2002

NOTICE OF INTENTION TO TAKE ORAL DEPOSITION AND SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM, BY PLAINTIFF TO DEFENDANT SSSI, ON 09/25/2002

LAM LETTER TO AUBIN RE: DEPOSITION NOTICE

NOTICE OF INTENTION TO TAKE ORAL DEPOSITION AND SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM, BY PLAINTIFF TO DEFENDANT SSSI, ON 09/25/2002

NOTICE OF INTENTION TO TAKE ORAL DEPOSITION AND SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM, BY PLAINTIFF TO DEFENDANT SSSI, ON 09/25/2002

LAM LETTER TO AUBIN RE: DEPOSITION NOTICE

LAM PREPARE AND FILE HARRIS' SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSES TO DEFENDANTS' FIRST SET OF REQUESTS FORPRODUCTION TO HARRIS

LAM LETTER TO AUBIN RE: MEDICAL RECORDS, DOCUMENTS; PLAINTIFF'S SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSES TO DEFENDANTS'REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTI

LAM PREPARE AND FILE HARRIS' SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSES TO DEFENDANTS' FIRST SET OF REQUESTS FORPRODUCTION TO HARRIS

LAM LETTER TO AUBIN RE: MEDICAL RECORDS, DOCUMENTS; PLAINTIFF'S SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSES TO DEFENDANTS'REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTI

OTHER TASK~

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Wed

Fri

Fri

Sat

Sat

Sun

Sun

Mon

Mon

Tue

Tue

Tue

Tue

Wed

Wed

Wed

Wed

DESCRIPTION

INFORMATIONAL

HOURS HOURS HOURSFEES EXH.

MBD 088

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 267-2 Filed 01/31/2008 Page 88 of 153

Page 89: Doc 267-2 - Example legal fees audit by Stuart, Maue, Mitchell & James legal fees auditing firm (rebuttal also uploaded)

Manziel Law OfficesATTORNEY & ASSISTANT BOTH BILL

EXHIBIT N

~ See the last page of exhibit for explanation

STUART MAUE

EXHIBIT N PAGE 5 of 18

09/24/02

09/24/02

09/25/02

09/25/02

10/08/02

10/08/02

10/09/02

10/09/02

10/10/02

10/10/02

10/10/02

10/10/02

10/11/02

10/11/02

10/12/02

10/12/02

10/14/02

10/14/02

10/14/02

DATE

Assistant

Manziel, L

Assistant

Attorney

Assistant

Attorney

Assistant

Attorney

Assistant

Assistant

Attorney

Attorney

Assistant

Attorney

Assistant

Attorney

Assistant

Assistant

Attorney

NAME

0.25

0.75

1.00

3.50

4.00

10.50

8.00

8.00

4.00

1.00

7.50

1.50

1.00

8.50

2.50

9.00

8.50

2.50

10.00

ENTRY

0.25

0.75

1.00

3.50

4.00

10.50

8.00

8.00

4.00

1.00

7.50

1.50

1.00

8.50

2.50

9.00

8.50

2.50

10.00

COMBINED

18.75

187.50

75.00

875.00

300.00

2,625.00

600.00

2,000.00

300.00

75.00

1,875.00

375.00

75.00

2,125.00

187.50

2,250.00

637.50

187.50

2,500.00

COMBINED

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

195

194

211

210

225

224

230

229

233

235

232

234

239

238

241

240

247

249

246

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

LAM LETTER TO CANDEE RE: RESPONSES TO PLAINTIFFS FIRST REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS TO DEFENDANTS; DEPOSITION DATES

LAM LETTER TO CANDEE RE: RESPONSES TO PLAINTIFFS FIRST REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS TO DEFENDANTS; DEPOSITION DATES

PLAINTIFF'S AMENDED DISCLOSURE OF EXPERT WITNESSES

PLAINTIFF'S AMENDED DISCLOSURE OF EXPERT WITNESSES

PLAINTIFFS SECOND REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS TO DEFENDANTS, TO DEFENDANTS SSSI

PLAINTIFFS SECOND REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS TO DEFENDANTS, TO DEFENDANTS SSSI

PLAINTIFF'S SECOND SET OF REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS TO THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT BERKLEY

PLAINTIFF'S SECOND SET OF REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS TO THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT BERKLEY

PLAINTIFF'S SECOND SET OF REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS TO THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT BERKLEY

NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF SUBPOENA, UPON PROAMERICA

PLAINTIFF'S SECOND SET OF REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS TO THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT BERKLEY

NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF SUBPOENA, UPON PROAMERICA

NOTICE OF INTENTION TO TAKE ORAL DEPOSITION AND SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM, BY PLAINTIFF TO DEFENDANT SSSI, ON 10/29/2002

NOTICE OF INTENTION TO TAKE ORAL DEPOSITION AND SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM, BY PLAINTIFF TO DEFENDANT SSSI, ON 10/29/2002

PLAINTIFF'S FIRST REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS TO THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT BERKLEY

PLAINTIFF'S FIRST REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS TO THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT BERKLEY

PLAINTIFF'S THIRD SET OF REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS TO DEFENDANTS, TO DEFENDANTS SSSI

PLAINTIFF HARRIS' FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES TO DEFENDANTS, TO DEFENDANTS SSSI

PLAINTIFF'S THIRD SET OF REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS TO DEFENDANTS, TO DEFENDANTS SSSI

OTHER TASK~

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Tue

Tue

Wed

Wed

Tue

Tue

Wed

Wed

Thu

Thu

Thu

Thu

Fri

Fri

Sat

Sat

Mon

Mon

Mon

DESCRIPTION

INFORMATIONAL

HOURS HOURS HOURSFEES EXH.

MBD 089

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 267-2 Filed 01/31/2008 Page 89 of 153

Page 90: Doc 267-2 - Example legal fees audit by Stuart, Maue, Mitchell & James legal fees auditing firm (rebuttal also uploaded)

Manziel Law OfficesATTORNEY & ASSISTANT BOTH BILL

EXHIBIT N

~ See the last page of exhibit for explanation

STUART MAUE

EXHIBIT N PAGE 6 of 18

10/14/02

10/14/02

10/14/02

10/15/02

10/15/02

10/16/02

10/16/02

10/22/02

10/22/02

10/30/02

10/30/02

10/31/02

10/31/02

11/13/02

11/13/02

11/14/02

11/14/02

11/15/02

DATE

Attorney

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Assistant

Attorney

Assistant

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Assistant

Attorney

Assistant

Attorney

Assistant

Attorney

Assistant

Attorney

Assistant

NAME

4.00

0.25

0.25

1.50

3.50

0.25

1.00

0.75

1.50

1.50

1.50

0.50

2.50

1.50

6.50

4.00

8.50

2.00

ENTRY

4.00

0.25

0.25

1.50

3.50

0.25

1.00

0.75

1.50

1.50

1.50

0.50

2.50

1.50

6.50

4.00

8.50

2.00

COMBINED

1,000.00

62.50

62.50

112.50

875.00

18.75

250.00

187.50

375.00

112.50

375.00

37.50

625.00

112.50

1,625.00

300.00

2,125.00

150.00

COMBINED

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

248

243

244

256

255

261

260

272

274

285

284

287

286

305

304

308

307

312

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

PLAINTIFF HARRIS' FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES TO DEFENDANTS, TO DEFENDANTS SSSI

LAM EMAIL TO AUBIN RE: PLAINTIFF'S SECOND REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS TO DEFENDANTS

LAM EMAIL TO AUBIN RE: PLAINTIFF'S SECOND REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS TO DEFENDANTS

PLAINTIFF HARRIS' FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES TO THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT, BERKLEY

PLAINTIFF HARRIS' FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES TO THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT, BERKLEY

LAM LETTER TO AUBIN RE: SCHEDULING AND LOCATION OF DEPOSITION OF SSSI, KAREN HERMANN

LAM LETTER TO AUBIN RE: SCHEDULING AND LOCATION OF DEPOSITION OF SSSI, KAREN HERMANN

LAM LETTER TO AUBIN RE: SCHEDULING AND LOCATION OF DEPOSITION OF SSSI, KAREN HERMANN

LAM LETTER TO AUBIN RE: SCHEDULING AND LOCATION OF DEPOSITION OF SSSI, KAREN HERMANN

MEET WITH SALES' ATTORNEYS TO REVIEW DOCUMENTS

MEET WITH SALES' ATTORNEYS TO REVIEW DOCUMENTS

RESEARCH AND PREPARATION OF HARRIS' RESPONSE TO SALES' MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER [DOC# 066]

RESEARCH AND PREPARATION OF HARRIS' RESPONSE TO SALES' MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER [DOC# 066]

PLAINTIFFS OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES TO DEFENDANTS' FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES TO PLAINTIFF, TO DEFEDANTS SSSI

PLAINTIFFS OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES TO DEFENDANTS' FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES TO PLAINTIFF, TO DEFEDANTS SSSI

PLAINTIFF'S OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES TO DEFENDANTS' FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES TO PLAINTIFF, TO DEFEDANTS SSSI

PLAINTIFF'S OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES TO DEFENDANTS' FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES TO PLAINTIFF, TO DEFEDANTS SSSI

PLAINTIFF'S OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES TO DEFENDANTS' FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES TO PLAINTIFF, TO DEFEDANTS SSSI

OTHER TASK~

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Mon

Mon

Mon

Tue

Tue

Wed

Wed

Tue

Tue

Wed

Wed

Thu

Thu

Wed

Wed

Thu

Thu

Fri

DESCRIPTION

INFORMATIONAL

HOURS HOURS HOURSFEES EXH.

MBD 090

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 267-2 Filed 01/31/2008 Page 90 of 153

Page 91: Doc 267-2 - Example legal fees audit by Stuart, Maue, Mitchell & James legal fees auditing firm (rebuttal also uploaded)

Manziel Law OfficesATTORNEY & ASSISTANT BOTH BILL

EXHIBIT N

~ See the last page of exhibit for explanation

STUART MAUE

EXHIBIT N PAGE 7 of 18

11/15/02

11/15/02

11/15/02

11/19/02

11/19/02

11/19/02

11/19/02

11/26/02

11/26/02

11/27/02

11/27/02

11/27/02

11/27/02

12/03/02

12/03/02

12/06/02

12/06/02

DATE

Assistant

Attorney

Attorney

Assistant

Assistant

Attorney

Attorney

Assistant

Attorney

Assistant

Assistant

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Assistant

Attorney

Assistant

Assistant

NAME

2.00

4.00

6.75

2.50

1.50

8.50

2.50

0.50

1.00

0.25

0.75

0.50

3.00

3.00

3.00

1.00

2.00

ENTRY

2.00

4.00

6.75

2.50

1.50

8.50

2.50

0.50

1.00

0.25

0.75

0.50

3.00

3.00

3.00

1.00

2.00

COMBINED

150.00

1,000.00

1,687.50

187.50

112.50

2,125.00

625.00

37.50

250.00

18.75

56.25

125.00

750.00

225.00

750.00

75.00

150.00

COMBINED

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

314

311

313

324

329

323

328

358

357

363

369

362

368

373

372

379

381

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

PLAINTIFF'S OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES TO DEFENDANTS' FIRST REQUESTS FOR ADMISSIONS TO PLAINTIFF, TO DEFENDANTSSSSI

PLAINTIFF'S OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES TO DEFENDANTS' FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES TO PLAINTIFF, TO DEFEDANTS SSSI

PLAINTIFF'S OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES TO DEFENDANTS' FIRST REQUESTS FOR ADMISSIONS TO PLAINTIFF, TO DEFENDANTSSSSI

RESEARCH AND PREPARATION OF HARRIS' MOTION AND BRIEF FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER, TO QUASH DEPOSITION NOTICES, AND FORSANCTIONS [DOC# 070]

PLAINTIFF'S OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANTS' NOTICE OF INTENTION TO TAKE THE DEPOSITION OF HARRIS, TO DEFENDANTS SSSL

RESEARCH AND PREPARATION OF HARRIS' MOTION AND BRIEF FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER, TO QUASH DEPOSITION NOTICES, AND FORSANCTIONS [DOC# 070]

PLAINTIFF'S OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANTS' NOTICE OF INTENTION TO TAKE THE DEPOSITION OF HARRIS, TO DEFENDANTS SSSL

PREP. OF AND LAM LETTER TO MR. FEITEL RE: SUBPOENA FOR INFO. [DOC # N/A]

PREP. OF AND LAM LETTER TO MR. FEITEL RE: SUBPOENA FOR INFO. [DOC # N/A]

LAM LETTER TO AUBIN RE: SCHEDULING AND LOCATION OF DEPOSITIONS

LAM LETTER TO WHITAKER RE: STIPULATIONS/DEPOSITIONS

LAM LETTER TO AUBIN RE: SCHEDULING AND LOCATION OF DEPOSITIONS

LAM LETTER TO WHITAKER RE: STIPULATIONS/DEPOSITIONS

IN-CHAMBER CONF. W/JUDGE BLEIL RE: MOTION TO COMPEL AND SANCTIONS

IN-CHAMBER CONF. W/JUDGE BLEIL RE: MOTION TO COMPEL AND SANCTIONS

THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT BERKLEY'S OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES TO THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANTS TRANSAM'S AND STANDARDSECURITY'S FIRST SET OF

THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT BERKLEY'S OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES TO THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANTS TRANSAM'S AND STANDARDSECURITY'S FIRST SET OF

OTHER TASK~

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Fri

Fri

Fri

Tue

Tue

Tue

Tue

Tue

Tue

Wed

Wed

Wed

Wed

Tue

Tue

Fri

Fri

DESCRIPTION

INFORMATIONAL

HOURS HOURS HOURSFEES EXH.

MBD 091

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 267-2 Filed 01/31/2008 Page 91 of 153

Page 92: Doc 267-2 - Example legal fees audit by Stuart, Maue, Mitchell & James legal fees auditing firm (rebuttal also uploaded)

Manziel Law OfficesATTORNEY & ASSISTANT BOTH BILL

EXHIBIT N

~ See the last page of exhibit for explanation

STUART MAUE

EXHIBIT N PAGE 8 of 18

12/06/02

12/06/02

12/08/02

12/08/02

12/09/02

12/09/02

12/10/02

12/10/02

12/10/02

12/10/02

12/11/02

12/11/02

12/17/02

12/17/02

12/18/02

12/18/02

12/18/02

12/18/02

DATE

Attorney

Attorney

Assistant

Manziel, L

Assistant

Manziel, L

Assistant

Assistant

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Assistant

Manziel, L

Assistant

Manziel, L

Assistant

Assistant

Attorney

Attorney

NAME

3.00

3.25

0.50

3.00

0.25

0.50

0.25

0.25

0.50

0.50

0.25

0.75

1.50

3.50

8.25

2.50

8.25

9.75

ENTRY

3.00

3.25

0.50

3.00

0.25

0.50

0.25

0.25

0.50

0.50

0.25

0.75

1.50

3.50

8.25

2.50

8.25

9.75

COMBINED

750.00

812.50

37.50

750.00

18.75

125.00

18.75

18.75

125.00

125.00

18.75

187.50

112.50

875.00

618.75

187.50

2,062.50

2,437.50

COMBINED

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

378

380

385

384

390

389

392

394

391

393

396

395

399

398

403

405

402

404

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT BERKLEY'S OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES TO THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANTS TRANSAM'S AND STANDARDSECURITY'S FIRST SET OF

THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT BERKLEY'S OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES TO THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANTS TRANSAM'S AND STANDARDSECURITY'S FIRST SET OF

LAM LETTER TO WHITAKER RE: REQUESTS FOR ADMISSIONS TO DEFENDANTS BERKLEY; DISCOVERY; DEPOSITIONS

LAM LETTER TO WHITAKER RE: REQUESTS FOR ADMISSIONS TO DEFENDANTS BERKLEY; DISCOVERY; DEPOSITIONS

LAM LETTER TO AUBIN RE: CONF. W/JUDGE BLEIL; DEPOSITIONS; MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

LAM LETTER TO AUBIN RE: CONF. W/JUDGE BLEIL; DEPOSITIONS; MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

LAM LETTER TO CANDEE RE: STIPULATIONS

LAM LETTER TO COUNSEL RE: NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL

LAM LETTER TO CANDEE RE: STIPULATIONS

LAM LETTER TO COUNSEL RE: NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL

LAM LETTER TO WHITAKER RE: DISCOVERY; DEPOSITIONS; SANCTIONS

LAM LETTER TO WHITAKER RE: DISCOVERY; DEPOSITIONS; SANCTIONS

LAM PREPARATION OF AMENDED DISCLOSURES

LAM PREPARATION OF AMENDED DISCLOSURES

PLAINTIFF HARRIS' AMENDED INITIAL WRITTEN DISCLOSURES

NOTICE OF INTENTION TO TAKE ORAL DEPOSITION AND SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM, BY PLAINTIFF TO DEFENDANT SSSI, ON 12/30/2002

PLAINTIFF HARRIS' AMENDED INITIAL WRITTEN DISCLOSURES

NOTICE OF INTENTION TO TAKE ORAL DEPOSITION AND SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM, BY PLAINTIFF TO DEFENDANT SSSI, ON 12/30/2002

OTHER TASK~

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Fri

Fri

Sun

Sun

Mon

Mon

Tue

Tue

Tue

Tue

Wed

Wed

Tue

Tue

Wed

Wed

Wed

Wed

DESCRIPTION

INFORMATIONAL

HOURS HOURS HOURSFEES EXH.

MBD 092

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 267-2 Filed 01/31/2008 Page 92 of 153

Page 93: Doc 267-2 - Example legal fees audit by Stuart, Maue, Mitchell & James legal fees auditing firm (rebuttal also uploaded)

Manziel Law OfficesATTORNEY & ASSISTANT BOTH BILL

EXHIBIT N

~ See the last page of exhibit for explanation

STUART MAUE

EXHIBIT N PAGE 9 of 18

12/23/02

12/23/02

12/23/02

12/23/02

12/27/02

12/27/02

12/27/02

12/27/02

12/28/02

12/28/02

12/30/02

12/30/02

01/02/03

01/02/03

01/03/03

01/03/03

01/03/03

DATE

Assistant

Assistant

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Assistant

Assistant

Attorney

Manziel, L

Assistant

Attorney

Assistant

Attorney

Assistant

Manziel, L

Assistant

Assistant

Attorney

NAME

2.00

1.50

7.50

2.50

0.25

9.00

9.00

1.00

4.50

4.50

13.50

13.50

0.50

2.50

0.50

1.00

2.25

ENTRY

2.00

1.50

7.50

2.50

0.25

9.00

9.00

1.00

4.50

4.50

13.50

13.50

0.50

2.50

0.50

1.00

2.25

COMBINED

150.00

112.50

1,875.00

625.00

18.75

675.00

2,250.00

250.00

337.50

1,125.00

1,012.50

3,375.00

37.50

625.00

37.50

75.00

562.50

COMBINED

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

410

413

409

412

420

424

423

419

426

425

428

427

434

433

441

443

440

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

LAM REV. DISCLOSED DOCUMENTS OF SSSI

LAM LETTER TO AUBIN AND LEVINE RE: DISCLOSURES; SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSES TO PLAINTIFF'S FIRST SET OFINTERROGATORIES

LAM REV. DISCLOSED DOCUMENTS OF SSSI

LAM LETTER TO AUBIN AND LEVINE RE: DISCLOSURES; SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSES TO PLAINTIFF'S FIRST SET OFINTERROGATORIES

LAM LETTER TO WHITAKER RE: MOTION TO COMPEL AND FOR SANCTIONS; MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION

PREPARATION FOR DEPOSITION OF KAREN HERMAN

PREPARATION FOR DEPOSITION OF KAREN HERMAN

LAM LETTER TO WHITAKER RE: MOTION TO COMPEL AND FOR SANCTIONS; MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION

PREPARATION FOR DEPOSITION OF KAREN HERMAN

PREPARATION FOR DEPOSITION OF KAREN HERMAN

DEPOSITION OF KAREN HERMAN

DEPOSITION OF KAREN HERMAN

LAM LETTER TO WHITAKER RE: STIPULATION AS TO AUTHENTICITY OF DOCUMENTS

LAM LETTER TO WHITAKER RE: STIPULATION AS TO AUTHENTICITY OF DOCUMENTS

SSSL EMPLOYEE HEALTH CARE PLAN AND SSSI'S SUPPLEMENTAL OBJECTIONS AND ANSWERS TO PLAINTIFF HARRIS' FIRST SET OFINTERROGATORIES

STIPULATION REGARDING DEPOSITIONS OF PLAINTIFF'S FORMER EMPLOYEES

SSSL EMPLOYEE HEALTH CARE PLAN AND SSSI'S SUPPLEMENTAL OBJECTIONS AND ANSWERS TO PLAINTIFF HARRIS' FIRST SET OFINTERROGATORIES

OTHER TASK~

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Mon

Mon

Mon

Mon

Fri

Fri

Fri

Fri

Sat

Sat

Mon

Mon

Thu

Thu

Fri

Fri

Fri

DESCRIPTION

INFORMATIONAL

HOURS HOURS HOURSFEES EXH.

MBD 093

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 267-2 Filed 01/31/2008 Page 93 of 153

Page 94: Doc 267-2 - Example legal fees audit by Stuart, Maue, Mitchell & James legal fees auditing firm (rebuttal also uploaded)

Manziel Law OfficesATTORNEY & ASSISTANT BOTH BILL

EXHIBIT N

~ See the last page of exhibit for explanation

STUART MAUE

EXHIBIT N PAGE 10 of 18

01/03/03

01/31/03

01/31/03

02/27/03

02/27/03

02/28/03

02/28/03

03/01/03

03/01/03

03/03/03

03/03/03

03/03/03

03/03/03

03/03/03

03/03/03

03/05/03

03/05/03

03/06/03

DATE

Attorney

Assistant

Attorney

Assistant

Attorney

Assistant

Attorney

Assistant

Attorney

Assistant

Assistant

Assistant

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Assistant

Attorney

Assistant

NAME

1.00

2.00

3.00

0.50

1.75

6.00

6.00

1.50

4.25

6.00

0.75

1.50

6.00

0.75

2.50

3.50

3.50

25.50

ENTRY

1.00

2.00

3.00

0.50

1.75

6.00

6.00

1.50

4.25

6.00

0.75

1.50

6.00

0.75

2.50

3.50

3.50

25.50

COMBINED

250.00

150.00

750.00

37.50

437.50

450.00

1,500.00

112.50

1,062.50

450.00

56.25

112.50

1,500.00

187.50

625.00

262.50

875.00

1,912.50

COMBINED

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

442

460

459

484

483

486

485

488

487

490

492

494

489

491

493

498

497

501

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

STIPULATION REGARDING DEPOSITIONS OF PLAINTIFF'S FORMER EMPLOYEES

REVIEW OF BERKLEY'S STIPULATIONS REGARDING DOCUMENTS [DOC# 079]

REVIEW OF BERKLEY'S STIPULATIONS REGARDING DOCUMENTS [DOC# 079]

PREPARATION FOR DEPOSITION OF LOIS DAVIS

PREPARATION FOR DEPOSITION OF LOIS DAVIS

DEPOSITION OF LOIS DAVIS

DEPOSITION OF LOIS DAVIS

PREPARATION FOR DEPOSITION OF BRENDA CROSSON

PREPARATION FOR DEPOSITION OF BRENDA CROSSON

DEPOSITION OF BRENDA CROSSON

THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT BERKLEY'S OBJECTIONS TO NOTICE TO TAKE DEPOSITION, BY THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT TRANSAM

THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT BERKLEY'S OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES TO THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANTS TRANSAM'S AND STANDARDSECURITY'S SECOND SET OF

DEPOSITION OF BRENDA CROSSON

THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT BERKLEY'S OBJECTIONS TO NOTICE TO TAKE DEPOSITION, BY THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT TRANSAM

THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT BERKLEY'S OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES TO THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANTS TRANSAM'S AND STANDARDSECURITY'S SECOND SET OF

DEPOSITION OF STEVE DUNSTON

DEPOSITION OF STEVE DUNSTON

RESEARCH AND PREPARATION OF HARRIS MSJ #1 AGAINST SALES [DOC# 083]

OTHER TASK~

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Fri

Fri

Fri

Thu

Thu

Fri

Fri

Sat

Sat

Mon

Mon

Mon

Mon

Mon

Mon

Wed

Wed

Thu

DESCRIPTION

INFORMATIONAL

HOURS HOURS HOURSFEES EXH.

MBD 094

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 267-2 Filed 01/31/2008 Page 94 of 153

Page 95: Doc 267-2 - Example legal fees audit by Stuart, Maue, Mitchell & James legal fees auditing firm (rebuttal also uploaded)

Manziel Law OfficesATTORNEY & ASSISTANT BOTH BILL

EXHIBIT N

~ See the last page of exhibit for explanation

STUART MAUE

EXHIBIT N PAGE 11 of 18

03/06/03

03/06/03

03/06/03

03/10/03

03/10/03

03/10/03

03/10/03

03/26/03

03/26/03

03/26/03

03/26/03

03/28/03

03/28/03

03/28/03

03/28/03

04/14/03

04/14/03

12/18/03

12/18/03

DATE

Assistant

Attorney

Attorney

Assistant

Assistant

Attorney

Attorney

Assistant

Assistant

Attorney

Attorney

Assistant

Assistant

Attorney

Attorney

Assistant

Attorney

Assistant

Attorney

NAME

38.00

82.50

79.50

2.50

4.00

4.50

8.00

6.00

1.00

10.50

2.25

5.00

10.00

67.00

72.50

1.00

2.25

1.00

3.25

ENTRY

38.00

82.50

79.50

2.50

4.00

4.50

8.00

6.00

1.00

10.50

2.25

5.00

10.00

67.00

72.50

1.00

2.25

1.00

3.25

COMBINED

2,850.00

20,625.00

19,875.00

187.50

300.00

1,125.00

2,000.00

450.00

75.00

2,625.00

562.50

375.00

750.00

16,750.00

18,125.00

75.00

562.50

75.00

812.50

COMBINED

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

503

500

502

507

509

506

508

512

514

511

513

516

518

515

517

521

520

579

578

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

RESEARCH AND PREPARATION OF HARRIS BRIEF AND APPENDIX SUPPORTING MSJ #1 [DOC# 084]

RESEARCH AND PREPARATION OF HARRIS MSJ #1 AGAINST SALES [DOC# 083]

RESEARCH AND PREPARATION OF HARRIS BRIEF AND APPENDIX SUPPORTING MSJ #1 [DOC# 084]

REVIEW OF SALES MSJ #1 AGAINST HARRIS [DOC# 101]

REVIEW OF BRIEF ON SALES' MSJ #1 AGAINST HARRIS [DOC# 102]

REVIEW OF SALES MSJ #1 AGAINST HARRIS [DOC# 101]

REVIEW OF BRIEF ON SALES' MSJ #1 AGAINST HARRIS [DOC# 102]

REVIEW OF SALES BRIEF ON ITS RESPONSE TO HARRIS MSJ #1 [DOC# 106]

REVIEW OF SALES OBJECTION TO HARRIS MSJ #1 EVIDENCE [DOC# 107]

REVIEW OF SALES BRIEF ON ITS RESPONSE TO HARRIS MSJ #1 [DOC# 106]

REVIEW OF SALES OBJECTION TO HARRIS MSJ #1 EVIDENCE [DOC# 107]

RESEARCH AND PREPARATION OF HARRIS RESPONSE TO SALES MSJ #1 [DOC# 108]

RESEARCH AND PREPARATION OF BRIEF AND APPENDIX SUPPORTING HARRIS RESPONSE TO SALES MSJ #1 [DOC# 109]

RESEARCH AND PREPARATION OF HARRIS RESPONSE TO SALES MSJ #1 [DOC# 108]

RESEARCH AND PREPARATION OF BRIEF AND APPENDIX SUPPORTING HARRIS RESPONSE TO SALES MSJ #1 [DOC# 109]

REVIEW OF SALES OBJECTION TO HARRIS EVIDENCE ON SALES MSJ #1 AGAINST HARRIS [DOC# 111]

REVIEW OF SALES OBJECTION TO HARRIS EVIDENCE ON SALES MSJ #1 AGAINST HARRIS [DOC# 111]

RESEARCH AND PREPARATION OF JOINT MOTION TO POSTPONE TRIAL [DOC# 152]

RESEARCH AND PREPARATION OF JOINT MOTION TO POSTPONE TRIAL [DOC# 152]

OTHER TASK~

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Thu

Thu

Thu

Mon

Mon

Mon

Mon

Wed

Wed

Wed

Wed

Fri

Fri

Fri

Fri

Mon

Mon

Thu

Thu

DESCRIPTION

INFORMATIONAL

HOURS HOURS HOURSFEES EXH.

MBD 095

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 267-2 Filed 01/31/2008 Page 95 of 153

Page 96: Doc 267-2 - Example legal fees audit by Stuart, Maue, Mitchell & James legal fees auditing firm (rebuttal also uploaded)

Manziel Law OfficesATTORNEY & ASSISTANT BOTH BILL

EXHIBIT N

~ See the last page of exhibit for explanation

STUART MAUE

EXHIBIT N PAGE 12 of 18

03/19/04

03/19/04

03/29/04

03/29/04

03/29/04

03/29/04

05/14/04

05/14/04

06/17/04

06/17/04

07/15/04

07/15/04

07/17/04

07/17/04

07/28/04

07/28/04

08/04/04

DATE

Assistant

Attorney

Assistant

Assistant

Attorney

Attorney

Assistant

Attorney

Assistant

Attorney

Assistant

Manziel, L

Assistant

Manziel, L

Assistant

Manziel, L

Assistant

NAME

1.50

4.00

0.50

8.00

1.50

32.00

3.00

18.00

0.50

1.00

0.50

0.50

1.00

1.00

1.00

2.50

0.50

ENTRY

1.50

4.00

0.50

8.00

1.50

32.00

3.00

18.00

0.50

1.00

0.50

0.50

1.00

1.00

1.00

2.50

0.50

COMBINED

112.50

1,000.00

37.50

600.00

375.00

8,000.00

225.00

4,500.00

37.50

250.00

37.50

125.00

75.00

250.00

75.00

625.00

37.50

COMBINED

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

586

585

601

603

600

602

619

618

631

630

637

636

641

640

648

647

650

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

REVIEW OF ORDER DENYING HARRIS MSJ #1 & GRANTING SALES MSJ #1 [DOC# 155]

REVIEW OF ORDER DENYING HARRIS MSJ #1 & GRANTING SALES MSJ #1 [DOC# 155]

RESEARCH AND PREPARATION OF HARRIS' MOTION TO VACATE, ALTER OR AMEND OR FOR RECONSIDERATION [DOC# 157]

RESEARCH AND PREPARATION OF HARRIS' BRIEF ON ITS MOTION TO VACATE, ALTER OR AMEND OR FOR RECONSIDERATION [DOC#158]

RESEARCH AND PREPARATION OF HARRIS' MOTION TO VACATE, ALTER OR AMEND OR FOR RECONSIDERATION [DOC# 157]

RESEARCH AND PREPARATION OF HARRIS' BRIEF ON ITS MOTION TO VACATE, ALTER OR AMEND OR FOR RECONSIDERATION [DOC#158]

RESEARCH AND PREPARATION OF HARRIS' REPLY TO SALES' RESPONSE TO HARRIS' MOTION TO VACATE #1 [DOC# 162]

RESEARCH AND PREPARATION OF HARRIS' REPLY TO SALES' RESPONSE TO HARRIS' MOTION TO VACATE #1 [DOC# 162]

RESEARCH AND PREPARATION OF HARRIS' NOTICE OF APPEAL [DOC# 164]

RESEARCH AND PREPARATION OF HARRIS' NOTICE OF APPEAL [DOC# 164]

LAM LETTER TO 5TH CIRCUIT RE: COMPLETED FORM FOR APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

LAM LETTER TO 5TH CIRCUIT RE: COMPLETED FORM FOR APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

LAM REV. DOCUMENT FROM 5TH CIRCUIT, GENERAL ORDER GOVERNING THE APPELLATE CONFERENCE PROGRAM

LAM REV. DOCUMENT FROM 5TH CIRCUIT, GENERAL ORDER GOVERNING THE APPELLATE CONFERENCE PROGRAM

LAM PREPARE AND FAX TO VIKRAM CHANDHOK, 5TH CIRCUIT RE: BRIEF WRITTEN LIST OF ISSUES AND APPLICABLE STANDARD OFREVIEW

LAM PREPARE AND FAX TO VIKRAM CHANDHOK, 5TH CIRCUIT RE: BRIEF WRITTEN LIST OF ISSUES AND APPLICABLE STANDARD OFREVIEW

LAM REV. LETTER FROM 5TH CIRCUIT RE: DOCKETED APPEAL RECORD

OTHER TASK~

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Fri

Fri

Mon

Mon

Mon

Mon

Fri

Fri

Thu

Thu

Thu

Thu

Sat

Sat

Wed

Wed

Wed

DESCRIPTION

INFORMATIONAL

HOURS HOURS HOURSFEES EXH.

MBD 096

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 267-2 Filed 01/31/2008 Page 96 of 153

Page 97: Doc 267-2 - Example legal fees audit by Stuart, Maue, Mitchell & James legal fees auditing firm (rebuttal also uploaded)

Manziel Law OfficesATTORNEY & ASSISTANT BOTH BILL

EXHIBIT N

~ See the last page of exhibit for explanation

STUART MAUE

EXHIBIT N PAGE 13 of 18

08/04/04

09/13/04

09/13/04

09/13/04

09/13/04

10/18/04

10/18/04

10/27/04

10/27/04

11/10/04

11/10/04

11/19/04

11/19/04

04/25/05

04/25/05

10/28/05

10/28/05

11/01/05

11/01/05

DATE

Manziel, L

Assistant

Assistant

Attorney

Attorney

Assistant

Manziel, L

Assistant

Attorney

Assistant

Attorney

Assistant

Attorney

Assistant

Attorney

Assistant

Attorney

Assistant

Attorney

NAME

0.50

45.00

21.00

86.00

21.00

1.50

1.50

0.75

3.50

15.00

65.00

0.25

0.15

0.50

1.50

2.00

4.00

1.00

2.00

ENTRY

0.50

45.00

21.00

86.00

21.00

1.50

1.50

0.75

3.50

15.00

65.00

0.25

0.15

0.50

1.50

2.00

4.00

1.00

2.00

COMBINED

125.00

3,375.00

1,575.00

21,500.00

5,250.00

112.50

375.00

56.25

875.00

1,125.00

16,250.00

18.75

37.50

37.50

375.00

150.00

1,000.00

75.00

500.00

COMBINED

01

02

02

02

02

01

01

02

02

02

02

02

02

02

02

01

01

01

01

649

70

90

60

80

656

655

130

120

150

140

180

170

260

250

678

677

681

680

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

LAM REV. LETTER FROM 5TH CIRCUIT RE: DOCKETED APPEAL RECORD

RESEARCH AND PREPARATION OF FILED HARRIS' APPELLATE BRIEF

PREPARATION AND FILING OF HARRIS' RECORD EXCERPTS

RESEARCH AND PREPARATION OF FILED HARRIS' APPELLATE BRIEF

PREPARATION AND FILING OF HARRIS' RECORD EXCERPTS

LAM PREPARE AND FAX TO COUNSEL RE: CORRECTED APPELLANT'S RECORD EXCERPTS TO 5TH CIRCUIT VIA OVERNIGHT DELIVERY

LAM PREPARE AND FAX TO COUNSEL RE: CORRECTED APPELLANT'S RECORD EXCERPTS TO 5TH CIRCUIT VIA OVERNIGHT DELIVERY

REVIEW OF SALES' APPELLATE BRIEF

REVIEW OF SALES' APPELLATE BRIEF

RESEARCH AND PREPARATION OF HARRIS REPLY BRIEF

RESEARCH AND PREPARATION OF HARRIS REPLY BRIEF

REVIEW OF ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR TRANSAMERICA AND STANDARD TO FILE BRIEF

REVIEW OF ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR TRANSAMERICA AND STANDARD TO FILE BRIEF

RESEARCH AND PREPARATION OF MOTION TO WAIVE ORAL ARGUMENT

RESEARCH AND PREPARATION OF MOTION TO WAIVE ORAL ARGUMENT

REVIEW OF ORDER REQUIRING ELECTRONIC FILING **** FOUR HOURS ??? *** [DOC# 173]

REVIEW OF ORDER REQUIRING ELECTRONIC FILING **** FOUR HOURS ??? *** [DOC# 173]

PRINT AND REVIEW MISC. ORDER 61, ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES MANUAL, ECF USER GUIDE

PRINT AND REVIEW MISC. ORDER 61, ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES MANUAL, ECF USER GUIDE

OTHER TASK~

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Wed

Mon

Mon

Mon

Mon

Mon

Mon

Wed

Wed

Wed

Wed

Fri

Fri

Mon

Mon

Fri

Fri

Tue

Tue

DESCRIPTION

INFORMATIONAL

HOURS HOURS HOURSFEES EXH.

MBD 097

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 267-2 Filed 01/31/2008 Page 97 of 153

Page 98: Doc 267-2 - Example legal fees audit by Stuart, Maue, Mitchell & James legal fees auditing firm (rebuttal also uploaded)

Manziel Law OfficesATTORNEY & ASSISTANT BOTH BILL

EXHIBIT N

~ See the last page of exhibit for explanation

STUART MAUE

EXHIBIT N PAGE 14 of 18

11/22/05

11/22/05

11/23/05

11/23/05

12/16/05

12/16/05

01/31/06

01/31/06

01/31/06

01/31/06

01/31/06

01/31/06

01/31/06

01/31/06

01/31/06

01/31/06

02/10/06

02/10/06

02/21/06

DATE

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Assistant

Attorney

Assistant

Attorney

Assistant

Assistant

Assistant

Assistant

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Assistant

Attorney

Assistant

NAME

0.50

0.50

1.50

8.00

0.25

1.50

8.00

5.00

3.00

2.50

45.00

50.00

6.00

5.00

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.50

1.00

ENTRY

0.50

0.50

1.50

8.00

0.25

1.50

8.00

5.00

3.00

2.50

45.00

50.00

6.00

5.00

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.50

1.00

COMBINED

125.00

125.00

112.50

2,000.00

18.75

375.00

600.00

375.00

225.00

187.50

11,250.00

12,500.00

1,500.00

1,250.00

62.50

62.50

18.75

125.00

75.00

COMBINED

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

693

694

702

701

714

713

743

745

753

755

742

744

752

754

764

765

790

789

821

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

LAM, REINCKENS REV. EMAIL RESPONSE FROM CANDEE APPROVING JOINT STATUS REPORT

LAM, REINCKENS REV. EMAIL RESPONSE FROM CANDEE APPROVING JOINT STATUS REPORT

RESEARCH AND PREPARATION OF THIRD JOINT STATUS REPORT [DOC# 174]

RESEARCH AND PREPARATION OF THIRD JOINT STATUS REPORT [DOC# 174]

REVIEW OF ORDER OF REFERRAL FOR MEDIATION [DOC# 176]

REVIEW OF ORDER OF REFERRAL FOR MEDIATION [DOC# 176]

RESEARCH AND PREPARATION OF HARRIS 2ND MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [DOC# 178]

RESEARCH AND PREPARATION OF BRIEF SUPPORTING HARRIS 2ND MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [DOC# 179]

REVIEW OF SALES MSJ (#2) V. HARRIS [DOC# 186]

REVIEW OF SALES BRIEF ON SALES MSJ#2 V. HARRIS [DOC# 187]

RESEARCH AND PREPARATION OF HARRIS 2ND MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [DOC# 178]

RESEARCH AND PREPARATION OF BRIEF SUPPORTING HARRIS 2ND MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [DOC# 179]

REVIEW OF SALES MSJ (#2) V. HARRIS [DOC# 186]

REVIEW OF SALES BRIEF ON SALES MSJ#2 V. HARRIS [DOC# 187]

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM CANDEE RE: SCHEDULING OF MEDIATION

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM CANDEE RE: SCHEDULING OF MEDIATION

REV. OF LETTER AND INVOICE FROM RIP PARKER RE: MEDIATION

REV. OF LETTER AND INVOICE FROM RIP PARKER RE: MEDIATION

REVIEW OF TRANSAMERICA'S RESPONSE TO SALES MPSJ [DOC# 194]

OTHER TASK~

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Tue

Tue

Wed

Wed

Fri

Fri

Tue

Tue

Tue

Tue

Tue

Tue

Tue

Tue

Tue

Tue

Fri

Fri

Tue

DESCRIPTION

INFORMATIONAL

HOURS HOURS HOURSFEES EXH.

MBD 098

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 267-2 Filed 01/31/2008 Page 98 of 153

Page 99: Doc 267-2 - Example legal fees audit by Stuart, Maue, Mitchell & James legal fees auditing firm (rebuttal also uploaded)

Manziel Law OfficesATTORNEY & ASSISTANT BOTH BILL

EXHIBIT N

~ See the last page of exhibit for explanation

STUART MAUE

EXHIBIT N PAGE 15 of 18

02/21/06

02/21/06

02/21/06

02/21/06

02/21/06

02/21/06

02/21/06

02/21/06

02/21/06

02/21/06

02/21/06

02/21/06

02/21/06

02/21/06

02/21/06

03/08/06

03/08/06

03/08/06

03/08/06

DATE

Assistant

Assistant

Assistant

Assistant

Assistant

Assistant

Assistant

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Assistant

Assistant

Assistant

Assistant

NAME

2.00

6.00

5.00

4.00

2.00

4.00

4.00

3.00

6.50

75.00

32.00

16.00

12.00

12.00

16.00

1.50

12.00

3.00

1.00

ENTRY

2.00

6.00

5.00

4.00

2.00

4.00

4.00

3.00

6.50

75.00

32.00

16.00

12.00

12.00

16.00

1.50

12.00

3.00

1.00

COMBINED

150.00

450.00

375.00

300.00

150.00

300.00

300.00

750.00

1,625.00

18,750.00

8,000.00

4,000.00

3,000.00

3,000.00

4,000.00

112.50

900.00

225.00

75.00

COMBINED

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

823

826

828

831

833

835

838

820

822

825

827

830

832

834

837

859

863

867

869

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

REVIEW OF TRANSAMERICA'S BRIEF RE RESPONSE TO SALES MPSJ [DOC# 195]

RESEARCH AND PREPARATION OF BRIEF ON HARRIS RESPONSE TO SALES 2ND MSJ [DOC# 197]

COMPILE AND ORGANIZE APPENDIX FOR HARRIS RESPONSE TO SALES 2ND MSJ [DOC# 198]

REVIEW OF BRIEF RE SALES RESPONSE TO REINSURER'S MSJ [DOC# 200]

REVIEW OF SALES BRIEF RE RESPONSE TO STANDARD'S MSJ [DOC# 201]

REVIEW OF SALES RENEWED OBJECTIONS TO HARRIS EVIDENCE [DOC# 202]

REVIEW OF SALES BRIEF RE RESPONSE TO HARRIS 2ND MSJ [DOC# 204]

REVIEW OF TRANSAMERICA'S RESPONSE TO SALES MPSJ [DOC# 194]

REVIEW OF TRANSAMERICA'S BRIEF RE RESPONSE TO SALES MPSJ [DOC# 195]

RESEARCH AND PREPARATION OF BRIEF ON HARRIS RESPONSE TO SALES 2ND MSJ [DOC# 197]

COMPILE AND ORGANIZE APPENDIX FOR HARRIS RESPONSE TO SALES 2ND MSJ [DOC# 198]

REVIEW OF BRIEF RE SALES RESPONSE TO REINSURER'S MSJ [DOC# 200]

REVIEW OF SALES BRIEF RE RESPONSE TO STANDARD'S MSJ [DOC# 201]

REVIEW OF SALES RENEWED OBJECTIONS TO HARRIS EVIDENCE [DOC# 202]

REVIEW OF SALES BRIEF RE RESPONSE TO HARRIS 2ND MSJ [DOC# 204]

REVIEW OF STANDARD'S REPLY ON EXCESS INSURER'S RENEWED MSJ [DOC# 209]

RESEARCH AND PREPARATION OF BRIEF ON HARRIS REPLY TO SALES RESPONSE TO HARRIS 2ND MSJ [DOC# 212]

REVIEW OF SALES' OBJECTION TO HARRIS EVIDENCE [DOC# 215]

REVIEW OF SALES' REPLY TO HARRIS RESPONSE TO SALES MSJ#2 [DOC# 216]

OTHER TASK~

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Tue

Tue

Tue

Tue

Tue

Tue

Tue

Tue

Tue

Tue

Tue

Tue

Tue

Tue

Tue

Wed

Wed

Wed

Wed

DESCRIPTION

INFORMATIONAL

HOURS HOURS HOURSFEES EXH.

MBD 099

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 267-2 Filed 01/31/2008 Page 99 of 153

Page 100: Doc 267-2 - Example legal fees audit by Stuart, Maue, Mitchell & James legal fees auditing firm (rebuttal also uploaded)

Manziel Law OfficesATTORNEY & ASSISTANT BOTH BILL

EXHIBIT N

~ See the last page of exhibit for explanation

STUART MAUE

EXHIBIT N PAGE 16 of 18

03/08/06

03/08/06

03/08/06

03/08/06

04/03/06

04/03/06

04/05/06

04/05/06

04/06/06

04/06/06

09/05/06

09/05/06

09/07/06

09/07/06

09/18/06

09/18/06

10/10/06

10/10/06

10/30/06

DATE

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Assistant

Attorney

Assistant

Attorney

Assistant

Attorney

Assistant

Attorney

Assistant

Attorney

Assistant

Attorney

Assistant

Attorney

Assistant

NAME

7.50

62.00

8.00

4.00

0.25

1.50

3.00

8.50

5.00

6.50

1.00

2.50

1.00

8.00

4.50

65.00

1.00

3.00

1.00

ENTRY

7.50

62.00

8.00

4.00

0.25

1.50

3.00

8.50

5.00

6.50

1.00

2.50

1.00

8.00

4.50

65.00

1.00

3.00

1.00

COMBINED

1,875.00

15,500.00

2,000.00

1,000.00

18.75

375.00

225.00

2,125.00

375.00

1,625.00

75.00

625.00

75.00

2,000.00

337.50

16,250.00

75.00

750.00

75.00

COMBINED

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

858

862

866

868

902

901

905

904

907

906

919

918

925

924

945

944

969

968

1000

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

REVIEW OF STANDARD'S REPLY ON EXCESS INSURER'S RENEWED MSJ [DOC# 209]

RESEARCH AND PREPARATION OF BRIEF ON HARRIS REPLY TO SALES RESPONSE TO HARRIS 2ND MSJ [DOC# 212]

REVIEW OF SALES' OBJECTION TO HARRIS EVIDENCE [DOC# 215]

REVIEW OF SALES' REPLY TO HARRIS RESPONSE TO SALES MSJ#2 [DOC# 216]

PREPARATION AND SUBMISSION OF MEDIATION STATEMENT TO RIP PARKER

PREPARATION AND SUBMISSION OF MEDIATION STATEMENT TO RIP PARKER

PREPARATION FOR MEDIATION

PREPARATION FOR MEDIATION

VISIT W/CLIENT AND MEDIATION W/RIP PARKER

VISIT W/CLIENT AND MEDIATION W/RIP PARKER

REVIEW OF ORDER ON CERTAIN OBJECTIONS TO EVIDENCE [DOC# 225]

REVIEW OF ORDER ON CERTAIN OBJECTIONS TO EVIDENCE [DOC# 225]

REVIEW OF ORDER PARTIALLY GRANTING CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [DOC# 226]

REVIEW OF ORDER PARTIALLY GRANTING CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [DOC# 226]

RESEARCH AND PREPARATION OF HARRIS BRIEF ON MOT TO RECONSIDER [DOC# 228]

RESEARCH AND PREPARATION OF HARRIS BRIEF ON MOT TO RECONSIDER [DOC# 228]

REVIEW OF SALES RESPONSE TO MOTION TO RECONSIDER [DOC# 233]

REVIEW OF SALES RESPONSE TO MOTION TO RECONSIDER [DOC# 233]

RESEARCH AND PREPARATION OF HARRIS REPLY BRIEF TO SALES RESPONSE TO MOT TO RECONSIDER [DOC# 234]

OTHER TASK~

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Wed

Wed

Wed

Wed

Mon

Mon

Wed

Wed

Thu

Thu

Tue

Tue

Thu

Thu

Mon

Mon

Tue

Tue

Mon

DESCRIPTION

INFORMATIONAL

HOURS HOURS HOURSFEES EXH.

MBD 100

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 267-2 Filed 01/31/2008 Page 100 of 153

Page 101: Doc 267-2 - Example legal fees audit by Stuart, Maue, Mitchell & James legal fees auditing firm (rebuttal also uploaded)

Manziel Law OfficesATTORNEY & ASSISTANT BOTH BILL

EXHIBIT N

~ See the last page of exhibit for explanation

STUART MAUE

EXHIBIT N PAGE 17 of 18

1,925.15 $395,318.75

10/30/06

11/02/06

11/02/06

06/12/07

06/12/07

12/20/07

12/20/07

12/28/07

12/28/07

DATE

Attorney

Assistant

Attorney

Assistant

Attorney

Assistant

Attorney

Assistant

Attorney

NAME

20.00

0.50

2.00

5.25

22.00

0.50

1.50

0.50

0.75

ENTRY

20.00

0.50

2.00

5.25

22.00

0.50

1.50

0.50

0.75

COMBINED

5,000.00

37.50

500.00

393.75

5,500.00

37.50

375.00

37.50

187.50

COMBINED

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

999

1005

1004

1010

1009

1012

1011

1015

1014

Total

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

RESEARCH AND PREPARATION OF HARRIS REPLY BRIEF TO SALES RESPONSE TO MOT TO RECONSIDER [DOC# 234]

RESEARCH AND PREPARATION OF JOINT MOTION TO SET ASIDE DN 232 TRIAL-SETTING CONFERENCE [DOC# 237]

RESEARCH AND PREPARATION OF JOINT MOTION TO SET ASIDE DN 232 TRIAL-SETTING CONFERENCE [DOC# 237]

6/12/2007 THROUGH 1/11/2008 - PREPARATION OF MOTION AND BRIEF FOR ATTORNEY FEES AND AFFIDAVIT AND EXHIBIT IN SUPPORTTHEREOF

6/12/2007 THROUGH 1/11/2008 - PREPARATION OF MOTION AND BRIEF FOR ATTORNEY FEES AND AFFIDAVIT AND EXHIBIT IN SUPPORTTHEREOF

REVIEW OF ORDER ON MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION [DOC# 240]

REVIEW OF ORDER ON MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION [DOC# 240]

REVIEW OF FINAL JUDGMENT [DOC# 241]

REVIEW OF FINAL JUDGMENT [DOC# 241]

OTHER TASK~

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Mon

Thu

Thu

Tue

Tue

Thu

Thu

Fri

Fri

DESCRIPTION

INFORMATIONAL

HOURS HOURS HOURSFEES EXH.

Number of Entries: 280

MBD 101

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 267-2 Filed 01/31/2008 Page 101 of 153

Page 102: Doc 267-2 - Example legal fees audit by Stuart, Maue, Mitchell & James legal fees auditing firm (rebuttal also uploaded)

Manziel Law OfficesATTORNEY & ASSISTANT BOTH BILL

EXHIBIT N

STUART MAUE

EXHIBIT N PAGE 18 of 18

AssistantAttorneyManziel, L

TIMEKEEPER HOURS FEES HOURS FEES HOURS FEES HOURS FEES HOURS FEESISOLATED BLOCKED MAXIMUM PROPORTIONAL COMBINED

(~) REASONS FOR TASK HOUR ASSIGNMENTS

1,925.15 $395,318.75 0.00 $0.00 1,925.15 $395,318.75 0.00 $0.00 1,925.15 $395,318.75

491.25 1,352.15

81.75

36,843.75 338,037.50 20,437.50

0.00 0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00 0.00

491.25 1,352.15

81.75

36,843.75 338,037.50 20,437.50

0.00 0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00 0.00

491.25 1,352.15

81.75

36,843.75 338,037.50 20,437.50

RANGE OF HOURS

RANGE OF FEES

SUMMARY OF HOURS AND FEES BY INDIVIDUAL

MBD 102

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 267-2 Filed 01/31/2008 Page 102 of 153

Page 103: Doc 267-2 - Example legal fees audit by Stuart, Maue, Mitchell & James legal fees auditing firm (rebuttal also uploaded)

Manziel Law OfficesBACK & FORTH COMMUNICATION - DUPLICATION

EXHIBIT O

STUART MAUE

EXHIBIT O PAGE 1 of 3

Assistant 1Manziel, L

HOURS FEESTIMEKEEPER

1.75 1.75

175.00 437.50

3.50 $612.50

COMBINED COMBINED

MBD 103

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 267-2 Filed 01/31/2008 Page 103 of 153

Page 104: Doc 267-2 - Example legal fees audit by Stuart, Maue, Mitchell & James legal fees auditing firm (rebuttal also uploaded)

Manziel Law OfficesBACK & FORTH COMMUNICATION - DUPLICATION

EXHIBIT O

~ See the last page of exhibit for explanation

STUART MAUE

EXHIBIT O PAGE 2 of 3

3.50 $612.50

04/16/03

04/16/03

05/05/03

05/05/03

05/05/03

05/05/03

05/05/03

05/05/03

06/04/03

06/04/03

04/16/04

04/16/04

02/16/06

02/16/06

DATE

Assistant 1

Manziel, L

Assistant 1

Assistant 1

Assistant 1

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Assistant 1

Manziel, L

Assistant 1

Manziel, L

Assistant 1

Manziel, L

NAME

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

ENTRY

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

COMBINED

18.75

62.50

18.75

18.75

18.75

62.50

62.50

62.50

18.75

62.50

18.75

62.50

62.50

62.50

COMBINED

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

524

525

540

542

545

541

543

546

558

559

611

612

812

813

Total

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

LA EMAIL TO LAM RE: STATUS OF BRENDA CROSSON DEPOSITION

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM LA RE: STATUS OF BRENDA CROSSON DEPOSITION

LA EMAIL TO LAM RE: MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; LA TO CONTACT AUBIN REQUESTING SETTLEMENT OFFER

LA EMAIL TO LAM RE: MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; LA ADVISED AUBIN OF REQUEST FOR SETTLEMENT OFFER

LA EMAIL TO LAM RE: SETTLEMENT AMOUNT; LEVINE REQUESTING SETTLEMENT FIGURE FROM LAM

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM LA RE: MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; LA TO CONTACT AUBIN REQUESTING SETTLEMENT OFFER

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM LA RE: MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; LA ADVISED AUBIN OF REQUEST FOR SETTLEMENT OFFER

LAM REV. EMAIL RE: SETTLEMENT AMOUNT; LEVINE REQUESTING SETTLEMENT FIGURE FROM LAM

LA EMAIL TO LAM RE: MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT RESPONSE; TO BE SENT VIA U.S. MAIL

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM LA RE: MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT RESPONSE; TO BE SENT VIA U.S. MAIL

LA EMAIL TO LAM RE: PREP. & FAX OF DOC.S TO RYE & HINDER FOR MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION [DOC # N/A]

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM LA RE: PREP. AND FAX OF DOCUMENTS TO RYE & HINDER FOR MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION [DOC # N/A]

LA EMAIL TO LAM RE: CROSSON RESPONSE TO SALES 2ND MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM LA RE: CROSSON RESPONSE TO SALES 2ND MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

OTHER TASK~

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Wed

Wed

Mon

Mon

Mon

Mon

Mon

Mon

Wed

Wed

Fri

Fri

Thu

Thu

DESCRIPTION

INFORMATIONAL

HOURS HOURS HOURSFEES EXH.

Number of Entries: 14

MBD 104

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 267-2 Filed 01/31/2008 Page 104 of 153

Page 105: Doc 267-2 - Example legal fees audit by Stuart, Maue, Mitchell & James legal fees auditing firm (rebuttal also uploaded)

Manziel Law OfficesBACK & FORTH COMMUNICATION - DUPLICATION

EXHIBIT O

STUART MAUE

EXHIBIT O PAGE 3 of 3

Assistant 1Manziel, L

TIMEKEEPER HOURS FEES HOURS FEES HOURS FEES HOURS FEES HOURS FEESISOLATED BLOCKED MAXIMUM PROPORTIONAL COMBINED

(~) REASONS FOR TASK HOUR ASSIGNMENTS

3.50 $612.50 0.00 $0.00 3.50 $612.50 0.00 $0.00 3.50 $612.50

1.75 1.75

175.00 437.50

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

1.75 1.75

175.00 437.50

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

1.75 1.75

175.00 437.50

RANGE OF HOURS

RANGE OF FEES

SUMMARY OF HOURS AND FEES BY INDIVIDUAL

MBD 105

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 267-2 Filed 01/31/2008 Page 105 of 153

Page 106: Doc 267-2 - Example legal fees audit by Stuart, Maue, Mitchell & James legal fees auditing firm (rebuttal also uploaded)

Manziel Law OfficesATTORNEY REVIEW OF OTHER ATTORNEY TASKS

EXHIBIT P

STUART MAUE

EXHIBIT P PAGE 1 of 7

Manziel, L

HOURS FEESTIMEKEEPER

22.00 5,500.00

22.00 $5,500.00

COMBINED COMBINED

MBD 106

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 267-2 Filed 01/31/2008 Page 106 of 153

Page 107: Doc 267-2 - Example legal fees audit by Stuart, Maue, Mitchell & James legal fees auditing firm (rebuttal also uploaded)

Manziel Law OfficesATTORNEY REVIEW OF OTHER ATTORNEY TASKS

EXHIBIT P

~ See the last page of exhibit for explanation

STUART MAUE

EXHIBIT P PAGE 2 of 7

03/26/04

03/26/04

03/26/04

03/28/04

03/28/04

03/29/04

05/04/04

06/07/04

06/16/04

11/16/05

01/09/06

01/10/06

01/12/06

01/16/06

01/18/06

01/19/06

01/26/06

01/26/06

DATE

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

NAME

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.50

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

ENTRY

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.50

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

COMBINED

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

125.00

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

COMBINED

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

590

592

594

597

599

605

616

625

627

684

716

719

721

723

726

729

731

733

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM REINCKENS RE: FORMATTING OF MOTION

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM REINCKENS RE: LATEST VERSION OF MOTION; BENEFIT ASSIGNMENT

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM REINCKENS RE: RATIFICATION OF ASSIGNMENT; RELEVANCY OF CONTENTS OF BRENDA CROSSON'SAFFIDAVIT

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM REINCKENS RE: DIFFERENCE BETWEEN ASSIGNMENT AND AUTHORIZATION

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM REINCKENS RE: FALLING THRU TO STATE LAW IF CONTRACT IS AMBIGUOUS

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM REINCKENS RE: MODIFIED CROSSON MOTION

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM REINCKENS RE: STATUS OF CASES IN FED. COURT [DOC #N/A]

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM REINCKENS RE: NOTICE OF APPEAL PREPPED

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM REINCKENS RE: STATUS OF APPEAL NOTICE; CLERK'S OFFICE ACCESSES SAME INTERNET-BASED SYSTEMCOUNSEL CAN ACCESS,

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM REINCKENS RE: RE: JOINT STATUS REPORT; REQUESTING PARTIES' POSITIONS ON ADDITIONAL MEDIATION

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM REINCKENS RE: LENGTH OF BRIEF

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM REINCKENS RE: LENGTH AND FORMATTING OF MOTION AND BRIEF

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM REINCKENS RE: QUESTION ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT FOOTNOTE 14

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM REINCKENS RE: QUESTION ON BRIEF FOOTNOTE 4

LAM REV. AND RESPOND TO EMAIL FROM REINCKENS RE: NO CHANGES TO SECOND MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; QUESTION

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM REINCKENS RE: NO CHANGES TO SECOND MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; QUESTION ANSWERED

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM REINCKENS RE: NEED APPENDIX REF. FOR MEDICAID FILING

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM REINCKENS RE: UB02 FOR MEDICAID CLAIM FILING

OTHER TASK~

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Fri

Fri

Fri

Sun

Sun

Mon

Tue

Mon

Wed

Wed

Mon

Tue

Thu

Mon

Wed

Thu

Thu

Thu

DESCRIPTION

INFORMATIONAL

HOURS HOURS HOURSFEES EXH.

MBD 107

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 267-2 Filed 01/31/2008 Page 107 of 153

Page 108: Doc 267-2 - Example legal fees audit by Stuart, Maue, Mitchell & James legal fees auditing firm (rebuttal also uploaded)

Manziel Law OfficesATTORNEY REVIEW OF OTHER ATTORNEY TASKS

EXHIBIT P

~ See the last page of exhibit for explanation

STUART MAUE

EXHIBIT P PAGE 3 of 7

01/27/06

01/27/06

01/27/06

01/30/06

02/01/06

02/01/06

02/01/06

02/01/06

02/01/06

02/02/06

02/02/06

02/02/06

02/10/06

02/10/06

02/13/06

02/13/06

02/14/06

02/16/06

02/16/06

DATE

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

NAME

0.50

0.25

0.50

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.50

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

ENTRY

0.50

0.25

0.50

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.50

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

COMBINED

125.00

62.50

125.00

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

125.00

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

COMBINED

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

735

737

739

741

770

772

774

776

778

781

783

785

793

795

800

802

805

807

809

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM REINCKENS RE: MEDICAID REIMBURSEMENT; ADDITIONAL ISSUES

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM REINCKENS RE: MEDICAID LANGUAGE FOR BRIEF OR MOTION

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM REINCKENS RE: MEDICAID REIMBURSEMENT

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM REINCKENS RE: SCHEDULING ORDER; MOTIONS TO BE FILED BY 1/31

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM REINCKENS RE: BERKLEY'S JAN 31 06 FILINGS

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM REINCKENS RE: DOWNLOADING E-FILINGS

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM REINCKENS RE: NOTICE OF SELECTION OF MEDIATOR

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM REINCKENS RE: SSSI'S JAN 31 06 FILINGS

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM REINCKENS RE: TRANSAM & STANDARD'S JAN 31 06 FILINGS

LAM REV. EMAIL AND ATTACHMENT FROM REINCKENS TO LAM RE: MEDICAID REIMBURSEMENT REGULATIONS

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM REINCKENS RE: VASQUEZ SUPPLEMENTAL AFFIDAVIT; ANSWER

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM REINCKENS RE: VASQUEZ SUPPLEMENTAL AFFIDAVIT

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM REINCKENS RE: MEDICAID REFUND ISSUE

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM REINCKENS TO LAM RE: STATUS OF MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM REINCKENS RE: PT. ACCT. NOTES, ADDITIONAL [DOC # N/A]

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM REINCKENS RE: REPLY BRIEF FORMATTING

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM REINCKENS RE: RESPONSE BRIEF

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM REINCKENS RE: CHANGES TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM REINCKENS RE: MINOR ADDITION TO CROSSON RESPONSE

OTHER TASK~

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Fri

Fri

Fri

Mon

Wed

Wed

Wed

Wed

Wed

Thu

Thu

Thu

Fri

Fri

Mon

Mon

Tue

Thu

Thu

DESCRIPTION

INFORMATIONAL

HOURS HOURS HOURSFEES EXH.

MBD 108

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 267-2 Filed 01/31/2008 Page 108 of 153

Page 109: Doc 267-2 - Example legal fees audit by Stuart, Maue, Mitchell & James legal fees auditing firm (rebuttal also uploaded)

Manziel Law OfficesATTORNEY REVIEW OF OTHER ATTORNEY TASKS

EXHIBIT P

~ See the last page of exhibit for explanation

STUART MAUE

EXHIBIT P PAGE 4 of 7

02/16/06

02/19/06

02/19/06

02/22/06

02/22/06

02/24/06

02/28/06

03/04/06

03/06/06

03/07/06

03/08/06

03/09/06

03/09/06

03/15/06

03/16/06

03/27/06

03/27/06

03/29/06

03/29/06

DATE

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

NAME

0.25

0.50

0.50

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.50

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

ENTRY

0.25

0.50

0.50

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.50

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

COMBINED

62.50

125.00

125.00

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

125.00

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

COMBINED

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

811

815

817

841

843

845

851

853

855

857

871

873

875

885

888

894

896

898

900

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM REINCKENS RE: MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT RESPONSE; REINCKENS TO PREP. BRIEF AND RESPONSE

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM REINCKENS CONFIRMING RECEIPT OF EMAILS RE: CROSSON

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM REINCKENS RE: OBJECTIONS TO VASQUEZ AFFIDAVIT

LAM REV. EMAIL AND ATTACHMENT FROM REINCKENS RE: FILINGS AND OBJECTION TO VASQUEZ AFFIDAVIT

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM REINCKENS RE: STATUS OF CROSSON FILINGS AND RESPONSE

LAM REV. EMAIL AND ATTACHMENT FROM REINCKENS TO LAM RE: FILINGS

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM REINCKENS RE: QUESTION ON PLAN'S ASSIGNMENT TIMELINE

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM REINCKENS RE: REPLY BRIEF, LATEST VERSION

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM REINCKENS RE: REPLY BRIEF, PDF FORMAT

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM REINCKENS RE: REPLY BRIEF, LATEST VERSION

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM REINCKENS RE: DOCUMENTS FILED TO DATE

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM REINCKENS RE: DOCUMENTS FILED TO DATE

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM REINCKENS RE: DOCUMENTS FILED TO DATE, ADDITIONAL

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM REINCKENS RE: E-FILINGS

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM REINCKENS RE: POST-HOC RATIONAL; CASE LAW, ADDITIONAL

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM REINCKENS RE: MEDIATION FEE

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM REINCKENS RE: MEDIATION FEE, RESPONSE

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM REINCKENS RE: E-FILINGS TO DATE

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM REINCKENS RE: E-FILINGS TO DATE, SECOND EMAIL

OTHER TASK~

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Thu

Sun

Sun

Wed

Wed

Fri

Tue

Sat

Mon

Tue

Wed

Thu

Thu

Wed

Thu

Mon

Mon

Wed

Wed

DESCRIPTION

INFORMATIONAL

HOURS HOURS HOURSFEES EXH.

MBD 109

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 267-2 Filed 01/31/2008 Page 109 of 153

Page 110: Doc 267-2 - Example legal fees audit by Stuart, Maue, Mitchell & James legal fees auditing firm (rebuttal also uploaded)

Manziel Law OfficesATTORNEY REVIEW OF OTHER ATTORNEY TASKS

EXHIBIT P

~ See the last page of exhibit for explanation

STUART MAUE

EXHIBIT P PAGE 5 of 7

04/19/06

06/02/06

09/06/06

09/07/06

09/07/06

09/08/06

09/12/06

09/16/06

09/17/06

09/18/06

09/18/06

09/18/06

09/20/06

09/27/06

10/09/06

10/11/06

10/11/06

10/26/06

10/26/06

DATE

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

NAME

0.25

0.25

0.50

0.25

0.50

0.50

0.50

0.50

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.50

0.25

0.25

0.25

ENTRY

0.25

0.25

0.50

0.25

0.50

0.50

0.50

0.50

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.50

0.25

0.25

0.25

COMBINED

62.50

62.50

125.00

62.50

125.00

125.00

125.00

125.00

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

125.00

62.50

62.50

62.50

COMBINED

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

910

915

923

927

929

934

936

940

942

949

951

953

957

962

967

977

979

988

990

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM REINCKENS RE: STATUS OF MEDIATION

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM REINCKENS RE: STATUS UPDATE

LAM REV. EMAIL AND ATTACHMENT FROM REINCKENS RE: EVIDENCE OBJECTIONS; DOCUMENTS ATTACHED

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM REINCKENS RE: END CHARGES UNDER MEDICAID

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM REINCKENS RE: PRE-JUDGMENT INTEREST

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM REINCKENS RE: END CHARGES UNDER MEDICAID, RESPONSE PROVIDED

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM REINCKENS RE: ISSUE, PREMIUM PAYMENTS

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM REINCKENS RE: BRIEF ON MOTION TO AMEND

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM REINCKENS RE: CROSSON AND PACIFICARE NOTICE

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM REINCKENS RE: CROSSON AND PACIFICARE NOTICE

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM REINCKENS RE: ORDER AND STATUS OR COURT'S COURTESY COPIES; UPDATE PROVIDED

LAM REV. EMAIL AND ATTACHMENT FROM REINCKENS RE: RECONSIDER BRIEF

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM REINCKENS RE: CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE

LAM REV. EMAIL AND ATTACHMENT FROM REINCKENS RE: ORDER

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM REINCKENS RE: STATUS OF E-FILING

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM REINCKENS RE: E-FILING REPLY TIME; ANSWER PROVIDED

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM REINCKENS RE: MOTION TO STRIKE DEFENDANTS' RESPONSE

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM REINCKENS RE: MOTION FOR FEES

LAM REV. EMAIL FROM REINCKENS RE: MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION; RESPONSE PROVIDED

OTHER TASK~

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Wed

Fri

Wed

Thu

Thu

Fri

Tue

Sat

Sun

Mon

Mon

Mon

Wed

Wed

Mon

Wed

Wed

Thu

Thu

DESCRIPTION

INFORMATIONAL

HOURS HOURS HOURSFEES EXH.

MBD 110

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 267-2 Filed 01/31/2008 Page 110 of 153

Page 111: Doc 267-2 - Example legal fees audit by Stuart, Maue, Mitchell & James legal fees auditing firm (rebuttal also uploaded)

Manziel Law OfficesATTORNEY REVIEW OF OTHER ATTORNEY TASKS

EXHIBIT P

STUART MAUE

EXHIBIT P PAGE 6 of 7

22.00 $5,500.00

DATE NAMEENTRY COMBINED COMBINED

Total

OTHER TASK~ DESCRIPTION

INFORMATIONAL

HOURS HOURS HOURSFEES EXH.

Number of Entries: 75

MBD 111

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 267-2 Filed 01/31/2008 Page 111 of 153

Page 112: Doc 267-2 - Example legal fees audit by Stuart, Maue, Mitchell & James legal fees auditing firm (rebuttal also uploaded)

Manziel Law OfficesATTORNEY REVIEW OF OTHER ATTORNEY TASKS

EXHIBIT P

STUART MAUE

EXHIBIT P PAGE 7 of 7

Manziel, LTIMEKEEPER HOURS FEES HOURS FEES HOURS FEES HOURS FEES HOURS FEES

ISOLATED BLOCKED MAXIMUM PROPORTIONAL COMBINED

(~) REASONS FOR TASK HOUR ASSIGNMENTS

22.00 $5,500.00 0.00 $0.00 22.00 $5,500.00 0.00 $0.00 22.00 $5,500.00

22.00 5,500.00 0.00 0.00 22.00 5,500.00 0.00 0.00 22.00 5,500.00

RANGE OF HOURS

RANGE OF FEES

SUMMARY OF HOURS AND FEES BY INDIVIDUAL

MBD 112

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 267-2 Filed 01/31/2008 Page 112 of 153

Page 113: Doc 267-2 - Example legal fees audit by Stuart, Maue, Mitchell & James legal fees auditing firm (rebuttal also uploaded)

Manziel Law OfficesTWO ATTORNEYS BILL FOR THE SAME TASK

EXHIBIT Q

STUART MAUE

EXHIBIT Q PAGE 1 of 3

Manziel, L

HOURS FEESTIMEKEEPER

7.50 1,875.00

7.50 $1,875.00

COMBINED COMBINED

MBD 113

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 267-2 Filed 01/31/2008 Page 113 of 153

Page 114: Doc 267-2 - Example legal fees audit by Stuart, Maue, Mitchell & James legal fees auditing firm (rebuttal also uploaded)

Manziel Law OfficesTWO ATTORNEYS BILL FOR THE SAME TASK

EXHIBIT Q

~ See the last page of exhibit for explanation

STUART MAUE

EXHIBIT Q PAGE 2 of 3

7.50 $1,875.00

11/21/05

11/22/05

11/22/05

11/22/05

11/22/05

11/22/05

11/22/05

11/23/05

11/23/05

11/23/05

11/23/05

11/23/05

11/23/05

DATE

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

Manziel, L

NAME

0.50

0.50

0.50

0.50

0.50

0.50

0.50

1.00

1.00

0.50

0.50

0.50

0.50

ENTRY

0.50

0.50

0.50

0.50

0.50

0.50

0.50

1.00

1.00

0.50

0.50

0.50

0.50

COMBINED

125.00

125.00

125.00

125.00

125.00

125.00

125.00

250.00

250.00

125.00

125.00

125.00

125.00

COMBINED

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

686

690

691

692

693

694

695

704

705

706

707

708

709

Total

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

LAM, REINCKENS REV. EMAIL RESPONSE FROM WHITAKER; POSITION PROVIDED

LAM, REINCKENS REV. EMAIL FROM AUBIN RE: MEDIATOR CHANGE; JOINT STATUS LANGUAGE PROVIDED

LAM, REINCKENS REV. EMAIL RESPONSE FROM AUBIN APPROVING JOINT STATUS REPORT

LAM, REINCKENS REV. EMAIL RESPONSE FROM CANDEE RE: CHANGE IN MEDIATOR

LAM, REINCKENS REV. EMAIL RESPONSE FROM CANDEE APPROVING JOINT STATUS REPORT

LAM, REINCKENS REV. EMAIL RESPONSE FROM CANDEE APPROVING JOINT STATUS REPORT

LAM, REINCKENS REV. EMAIL RESPONSE FROM WHITAKER; WHITAKER REQUESTING CHANGE IN LANGUAGE

LAM, REINCKENS REV. AND DISCUSS EMAIL RESPONSE FROM AUBIN RE: LANGUAGE REQUESTED BY WHITAKER FOR JOINT STATUSREPORT

LAM, REINCKENS REV. AND DISCUSS EMAIL RESPONSE FROM WHITAKER RE: JOINT STATUS REPORT; WHITAKER REQUESTINGADDITIONAL LANGUAGE

LAM, REINCKENS REV. EMAIL RESPONSE FROM AUBIN AUTHORIZING ELECTRONIC SIG. FOR JOINT STATUS REPORT

LAM, REINCKENS REV. EMAIL RESPONSE FROM CANDEE RE: LANGUAGE REQUESTED BY WHITAKER FOR JOINT STATUS REPORT

LAM, REINCKENS REV. EMAIL RESPONSE FROM WHITAKER AUTHORIZING ELECTRONIC SIG. FOR JOINT STATUS REPORT

LAM, REINCKENS REV. EMAIL RESPONSE FROM WHITAKER RE: JOINT STATUS REPORT; WHITAKER REQUESTING ADDITIONALLANGUAGE

OTHER TASK~

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Mon

Tue

Tue

Tue

Tue

Tue

Tue

Wed

Wed

Wed

Wed

Wed

Wed

DESCRIPTION

INFORMATIONAL

HOURS HOURS HOURSFEES EXH.

Number of Entries: 13

MBD 114

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 267-2 Filed 01/31/2008 Page 114 of 153

Page 115: Doc 267-2 - Example legal fees audit by Stuart, Maue, Mitchell & James legal fees auditing firm (rebuttal also uploaded)

Manziel Law OfficesTWO ATTORNEYS BILL FOR THE SAME TASK

EXHIBIT Q

STUART MAUE

EXHIBIT Q PAGE 3 of 3

Manziel, LTIMEKEEPER HOURS FEES HOURS FEES HOURS FEES HOURS FEES HOURS FEES

ISOLATED BLOCKED MAXIMUM PROPORTIONAL COMBINED

(~) REASONS FOR TASK HOUR ASSIGNMENTS

7.50 $1,875.00 0.00 $0.00 7.50 $1,875.00 0.00 $0.00 7.50 $1,875.00

7.50 1,875.00 0.00 0.00 7.50 1,875.00 0.00 0.00 7.50 1,875.00

RANGE OF HOURS

RANGE OF FEES

SUMMARY OF HOURS AND FEES BY INDIVIDUAL

MBD 115

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 267-2 Filed 01/31/2008 Page 115 of 153

Page 116: Doc 267-2 - Example legal fees audit by Stuart, Maue, Mitchell & James legal fees auditing firm (rebuttal also uploaded)

1 This order does not apply to the following:

(1) pro se, prisoner litigants (and thus a copy of any document filedelectronically in a case involving a pro-se prisoner litigant mustbe served on the prisoner via the non-electronic methods authorizedby Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5);

(2) the filing of the state-court record in cases involving the pursuitof habeas relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (thus, the state-courtrecord must be filed by conventional, non-electronic means);

(3) the filing of the administrative record in cases seeking judicialreview of a decision of the Commissioner of Social Security under42 U.S.C. § 405(g) (thus, the administrative record must be filedby conventional, non-electronic means); and

(4) the filing of sealed documents (thus, all documents required bylocal civil rule 79.3(a)(2) must be filed by conventional, non-electronic means, including the motion to seal (this constitutes amodification to paragraph III(B) of the CM/ECF Civil and CriminalAdministrative Procedures Manual)).

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTFOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH DIVISION

HARRIS METHODIST FORT WORTH §§

VS. § ACTION NO. 4:01-CV-567-Y§

SALES SUPPORT SERVICES INC. §EMPLOYEE HEALTH CARE PLAN and §SALES SUPPORT SERVICES INC. §

§VS. §

§TRANSAMERICA LIFE INSURANCE AND §ANNUITY COMPANY, ET AL. §

ORDER ASSIGNING CASE TO ELECTRONIC CASE FILING

The Court has decided that this case and all civil cases on

the “Y” docket will be enrolled in the Court’s Electronic Case

Filing (“ECF”) system.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the above-referenced case is

hereby ENROLLED in the ECF system.1

It is further ORDERED that, within ten days of the date of

notice of this order, all counsel of record who have not already

completed the following steps shall:

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 173 Filed 10/28/2005 Page 1 of 4

MBD 116

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 267-2 Filed 01/31/2008 Page 116 of 153

Page 117: Doc 267-2 - Example legal fees audit by Stuart, Maue, Mitchell & James legal fees auditing firm (rebuttal also uploaded)

1. Print and review Miscellaneous Order Number61;

2. Print and review the Administrative ProcedureManual;

3. Complete the online Attorney Tutorial for ECFTraining;

4. Print and review the User Guide; and

5. Complete the Attorney/User Registration Formand forward it to the clerk’s office. Onceyou have received your login and password, youare registered for electronic filing in alldivisions and do not need to submitregistration forms for any other cases filedin the Northern District of Texas in which youare or become an attorney of record.

This information is located on the Court’s website at:

http://www.txnd.uscourts.gov/filing/ecf.html

Questions regarding registration for the ECF system should be

directed to Autumn Yarnell, ECF Administrator, at 214-753-2160 or

the Fort Worth Help Desk at 817-850-6733 or 1-800-240-7240.

It is further ORDERED that counsel in this case who have not

already registered for notice by electronic transmission (e-mail)

of all matters filed with the district clerk shall do so within ten

days of the date of notice of this order. Information about how to

register for electronic noticing can be found on the Court’s

website at http://www.txnd.uscourts.gov/records/ens.html.

It is further ORDERED that:

1. The electronic record will be the officialcourt record in this case;

2. This case will be governed, unless otherwiseordered, by Miscellaneous Order 61, the CM/ECF

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 173 Filed 10/28/2005 Page 2 of 4

MBD 117

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 267-2 Filed 01/31/2008 Page 117 of 153

Page 118: Doc 267-2 - Example legal fees audit by Stuart, Maue, Mitchell & James legal fees auditing firm (rebuttal also uploaded)

2 The Notice of Electronic Filing will be automatically received by thefiler of each document upon the completion of the electronic filing procedure.

3 The Court will not begin its consideration of the document until receiptof the paper copy.

Civil and Criminal Administrative ProceduresManual, and the CM/ECF User Guide;

3. Questions regarding filing under the ECFsystem should be directed to Bob Barnes at817-850-6612 or the Fort Worth Help Desk at817-850-6733 or 1-800-240-7240;

4. A paper copy of each document filedelectronically must be delivered to theclerk’s office within three days of theelectronic file date. The paper copy must bemarked “Judge’s Copy,” must have a copy of theNotice of Electronic Filing2 for that documentaffixed to the front of the copy, and must besubmitted in the form otherwise required bythe local rules for conventional filings;3

5. Local civil rule 15.1 will not apply to thiscase. The following shall apply instead:

A party who electronicallymoves for leave to file an amendedpleading must electronically attachthe proposed amended pleading as anexhibit to the motion for leave.The party so moving must also complywith paragraph 4, above, withrespect to such motion and attach-ment. If the motion for leave isgranted, the moving party will beordered to electronically file theamended pleading within a timecertain.

6. Local civil rule 7.1(c) is modified in thatproposed orders must be electronicallysubmitted with every motion in WordPerfect orWord format. These orders must be submittedon the ECF system simultaneously with thefiling of the motion.

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 173 Filed 10/28/2005 Page 3 of 4

MBD 118

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 267-2 Filed 01/31/2008 Page 118 of 153

Page 119: Doc 267-2 - Example legal fees audit by Stuart, Maue, Mitchell & James legal fees auditing firm (rebuttal also uploaded)

It is further ORDERED that Plaintiff serve a copy of this

order on Defendant(s) with service of process. If process has

already been served, Plaintiff is ORDERED to serve, within five

days of receipt of this order and in accordance with Federal Rule

of Civil Procedure 5(b), a copy of this order on any Defendant who

has not yet filed a response to Plaintiff’s complaint.

SIGNED October 28, 2005.

TRM/be[07-05-05]

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 173 Filed 10/28/2005 Page 4 of 4

MBD 119

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 267-2 Filed 01/31/2008 Page 119 of 153

Page 120: Doc 267-2 - Example legal fees audit by Stuart, Maue, Mitchell & James legal fees auditing firm (rebuttal also uploaded)

Manziel Law OfficesEXCESSIVE TIME FOR NOTICES

EXHIBIT S

STUART MAUE

EXHIBIT S PAGE 1 of 3

AssistantAttorney

HOURS FEESTIMEKEEPER

10.50 28.25

787.50 7,062.50

38.75 $7,850.00

COMBINED COMBINED

MBD 120

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 267-2 Filed 01/31/2008 Page 120 of 153

Page 121: Doc 267-2 - Example legal fees audit by Stuart, Maue, Mitchell & James legal fees auditing firm (rebuttal also uploaded)

Manziel Law OfficesEXCESSIVE TIME FOR NOTICES

EXHIBIT S

~ See the last page of exhibit for explanation

STUART MAUE

EXHIBIT S PAGE 2 of 3

38.75 $7,850.00

09/09/02

09/09/02

09/10/02

09/10/02

10/10/02

10/10/02

10/11/02

10/11/02

11/15/02

12/18/02

12/18/02

02/10/03

DATE

Assistant

Attorney

Assistant

Attorney

Assistant

Attorney

Assistant

Attorney

Attorney

Assistant

Attorney

Attorney

NAME

2.00

3.00

4.00

4.50

1.00

1.50

1.00

8.50

0.50

2.50

9.75

0.50

ENTRY

2.00

3.00

4.00

4.50

1.00

1.50

1.00

8.50

0.50

2.50

9.75

0.50

COMBINED

150.00

750.00

300.00

1,125.00

75.00

375.00

75.00

2,125.00

125.00

187.50

2,437.50

125.00

COMBINED

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

171

170

176

175

235

234

239

238

316

405

404

467

Total

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

NOTICE OF INTENTION TO TAKE ORAL DEPOSITION AND SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM, BY PLAINTIFF TO DEFENDANT SSSI, ON 09/25/2002

NOTICE OF INTENTION TO TAKE ORAL DEPOSITION AND SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM, BY PLAINTIFF TO DEFENDANT SSSI, ON 09/25/2002

NOTICE OF INTENTION TO TAKE ORAL DEPOSITION AND SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM, BY PLAINTIFF TO DEFENDANT SSSI, ON 09/25/2002

NOTICE OF INTENTION TO TAKE ORAL DEPOSITION AND SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM, BY PLAINTIFF TO DEFENDANT SSSI, ON 09/25/2002

NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF SUBPOENA, UPON PROAMERICA

NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF SUBPOENA, UPON PROAMERICA

NOTICE OF INTENTION TO TAKE ORAL DEPOSITION AND SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM, BY PLAINTIFF TO DEFENDANT SSSI, ON 10/29/2002

NOTICE OF INTENTION TO TAKE ORAL DEPOSITION AND SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM, BY PLAINTIFF TO DEFENDANT SSSI, ON 10/29/2002

NOTICE OF INTENTION TO TAKE THE DEPOSITION OF HARRIS, BY DEFENDANT SSSI, ON 11/25/2002

NOTICE OF INTENTION TO TAKE ORAL DEPOSITION AND SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM, BY PLAINTIFF TO DEFENDANT SSSI, ON 12/30/2002

NOTICE OF INTENTION TO TAKE ORAL DEPOSITION AND SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM, BY PLAINTIFF TO DEFENDANT SSSI, ON 12/30/2002

NOTICE TO TAKE DEPOSITION OF BERKLEY, BY THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT TRANSAM ON 03/04/2003

OTHER TASK~

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Mon

Mon

Tue

Tue

Thu

Thu

Fri

Fri

Fri

Wed

Wed

Mon

DESCRIPTION

INFORMATIONAL

HOURS HOURS HOURSFEES EXH.

Number of Entries: 12

MBD 121

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 267-2 Filed 01/31/2008 Page 121 of 153

Page 122: Doc 267-2 - Example legal fees audit by Stuart, Maue, Mitchell & James legal fees auditing firm (rebuttal also uploaded)

Manziel Law OfficesEXCESSIVE TIME FOR NOTICES

EXHIBIT S

STUART MAUE

EXHIBIT S PAGE 3 of 3

AssistantAttorney

TIMEKEEPER HOURS FEES HOURS FEES HOURS FEES HOURS FEES HOURS FEESISOLATED BLOCKED MAXIMUM PROPORTIONAL COMBINED

(~) REASONS FOR TASK HOUR ASSIGNMENTS

38.75 $7,850.00 0.00 $0.00 38.75 $7,850.00 0.00 $0.00 38.75 $7,850.00

10.50 28.25

787.50 7,062.50

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

10.50 28.25

787.50 7,062.50

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

10.50 28.25

787.50 7,062.50

RANGE OF HOURS

RANGE OF FEES

SUMMARY OF HOURS AND FEES BY INDIVIDUAL

MBD 122

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 267-2 Filed 01/31/2008 Page 122 of 153

Page 123: Doc 267-2 - Example legal fees audit by Stuart, Maue, Mitchell & James legal fees auditing firm (rebuttal also uploaded)

Manziel Law OfficesPLEADINGS AND DISCOVERY THAT APPEAR TO RELATE TO 3RD PARTY CLAIMS

EXHIBIT T

STUART MAUE

EXHIBIT T PAGE 1 of 12

AssistantAttorneyManziel, L

HOURS FEESTIMEKEEPER

16.00 222.20

0.50

1,200.00 55,550.00

125.00

238.70 $56,875.00

COMBINED COMBINED

MBD 123

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 267-2 Filed 01/31/2008 Page 123 of 153

Page 124: Doc 267-2 - Example legal fees audit by Stuart, Maue, Mitchell & James legal fees auditing firm (rebuttal also uploaded)

Manziel Law OfficesPLEADINGS AND DISCOVERY THAT APPEAR TO RELATE TO 3RD PARTY CLAIMS

EXHIBIT T

~ See the last page of exhibit for explanation

STUART MAUE

EXHIBIT T PAGE 2 of 12

11/15/01

11/16/01

11/20/01

12/05/01

02/27/02

02/27/02

03/06/02

03/15/02

04/08/02

04/10/02

04/23/02

04/23/02

04/24/02

05/11/02

05/14/02

05/14/02

06/03/02

DATE

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Assistant

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Manziel, L

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

NAME

0.25

0.25

0.15

1.00

0.25

1.00

0.50

0.50

0.25

1.50

0.75

0.25

0.25

0.25

4.00

0.75

4.00

ENTRY

0.25

0.25

0.15

1.00

0.25

1.00

0.50

0.50

0.25

1.50

0.75

0.25

0.25

0.25

4.00

0.75

4.00

COMBINED

62.50

62.50

37.50

250.00

18.75

250.00

125.00

125.00

62.50

375.00

187.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

1,000.00

187.50

1,000.00

COMBINED

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

19

20

21

22

30

29

33

35

38

39

41

42

43

49

51

52

59

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

CONFERENCE WITH SALES' ATTORNEY RE NO OPPOSITION TO SALES' MOTION FOR THIRD-PARTY ACTION [DOC# 011]

REVIEW OF UNOPPOSED MOTION TO JOIN THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANTS [DOC# 011]

REVIEW OF ORDER TO JOIN THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANTS [DOC# 012]

REVIEW OF THIRD-PARTY COMPLAINT [DOC# 013]

REVIEW OF STANDARD SECURITY LIFE'S 3RD PARTY ANSWER [DOC# 022]

REVIEW OF STANDARD SECURITY LIFE'S 3RD PARTY ANSWER [DOC# 022]

REVIEW OF TRANSAMERICA'S 3RD PARTY ANSWER [DOC# 025]

REVIEW OF BERKLEY'S 3RD PARTY ANSWER [DOC# 027]

THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT BERKLEY'S DISCLOSURE OF INTERESTED PARTIES

THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANTS TRANSAM'S AND STANDARD SECURITY'S FIRST SET OF REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTSTO DEFENDANTS, TO DEFEN

THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT TRANSAM'S FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES TO DEFENDANTS, TO DEFENDANTS SSSL

THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANTS TRANSAM'S AND STANDARD SECURITY'S DESIGNATION OF EXPERT WITNESSES

THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT BERKLEY'S DESIGNATION OF EXPERT WITNESSES

LAM REV. LETTER TO WHITAKER FROM AUBIN RE: DEFENDANT'S RESPONSES AND OBJECTIONS TO TRANSAM'S AND STANDARDSECURITY'S FIRST SET OF

DEFENDANTS' RESPONSES AND OBJECTIONS TO TRANSAM'S AND STANDARD SECURITY'S FIRST SET OF REQUESTS FORPRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS

SSSI'S FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION TO BERKLEY

DEFENDANTS' RESPONSES AND OBJECTIONS TO TRANSAM'S AND STANDARD SECURITY'S FIRST SET OF REQUESTS FORADMISSIONS

OTHER TASK~

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Thu

Fri

Tue

Wed

Wed

Wed

Wed

Fri

Mon

Wed

Tue

Tue

Wed

Sat

Tue

Tue

Mon

DESCRIPTION

INFORMATIONAL

HOURS HOURS HOURSFEES EXH.

MBD 124

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 267-2 Filed 01/31/2008 Page 124 of 153

Page 125: Doc 267-2 - Example legal fees audit by Stuart, Maue, Mitchell & James legal fees auditing firm (rebuttal also uploaded)

Manziel Law OfficesPLEADINGS AND DISCOVERY THAT APPEAR TO RELATE TO 3RD PARTY CLAIMS

EXHIBIT T

~ See the last page of exhibit for explanation

STUART MAUE

EXHIBIT T PAGE 3 of 12

06/03/02

06/03/02

06/27/02

06/27/02

06/28/02

06/28/02

07/31/02

07/31/02

08/27/02

09/02/02

09/02/02

09/02/02

09/02/02

09/10/02

09/16/02

09/16/02

09/20/02

09/24/02

09/24/02

DATE

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

NAME

1.50

1.00

0.75

0.25

1.00

0.50

2.50

0.25

0.75

0.25

0.25

0.50

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.50

0.25

0.25

3.50

ENTRY

1.50

1.00

0.75

0.25

1.00

0.50

2.50

0.25

0.75

0.25

0.25

0.50

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.50

0.25

0.25

3.50

COMBINED

375.00

250.00

187.50

62.50

250.00

125.00

625.00

62.50

187.50

62.50

62.50

125.00

62.50

62.50

62.50

125.00

62.50

62.50

875.00

COMBINED

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

60

61

81

82

83

84

98

99

142

159

160

161

162

172

182

183

186

191

192

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

SSSI OBJECTIONS AND ANSWERS TO STANDARD SECURITY'S FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES

SSSI OBJECTIONS AND ANSWERS TO TRANSAM'S FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES

THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT, BERKLEY'S OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES TO SSSI'S FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES

THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT, BERKLEY'S OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES TO SSSI'S FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION

SSSI'S FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION TO TRANSAM

SSSI'S FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION TO STANDARD SECURITY

THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANTS TRANSAM'S AND STANDARD SECURITY'S INITIAL DISCLOSURES, RULE 26(A)

THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT STANDARD SECURITY'S OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES TO SSSI'S FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION

THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANTS TRANSAM'S AND STANDARD SECURITY'S AMENDED DESIGNATION OF EXPERT WITNESSES

THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT, BERKLEY'S RULE 26(A) DISCLOSURES

THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT, BERKLEY'S FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES TO DEFENDANT SSSI EMPLOYEE HEALTH CARE

THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT, BERKLEY'S FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION TO SSSI

THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT, BERKLEY'S FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION TO SSSI EMPLOYEE HEALTH CARE PLAN

REVIEW OF SALES' MOTION TO AMEND THIRD-PARTY COMPLAINT [DOC# 045]

THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT BERKLEY'S FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES TO THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT TRANSAM

THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT BERKLEY'S FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION TO TRANSAM

REVIEW OF SALES' SUPPLEMENTAL CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE ON MOTION TO AMEND THIRD-PARTY COMPLAINT [DOC# 047]

REVIEW OF STANDARD SECURITY'S BRIEF ON STANDARD'S MSJ AGAINST SALES [DOC# 049]

REVIEW OF TRANSAMERICA'S BRIEF ON TRANSAMERICA'S MSJ AGAINST SALES [DOC# 050]

OTHER TASK~

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Mon

Mon

Thu

Thu

Fri

Fri

Wed

Wed

Tue

Mon

Mon

Mon

Mon

Tue

Mon

Mon

Fri

Tue

Tue

DESCRIPTION

INFORMATIONAL

HOURS HOURS HOURSFEES EXH.

MBD 125

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 267-2 Filed 01/31/2008 Page 125 of 153

Page 126: Doc 267-2 - Example legal fees audit by Stuart, Maue, Mitchell & James legal fees auditing firm (rebuttal also uploaded)

Manziel Law OfficesPLEADINGS AND DISCOVERY THAT APPEAR TO RELATE TO 3RD PARTY CLAIMS

EXHIBIT T

~ See the last page of exhibit for explanation

STUART MAUE

EXHIBIT T PAGE 4 of 12

09/24/02

09/25/02

09/25/02

10/01/02

10/07/02

10/07/02

10/07/02

10/08/02

10/08/02

10/09/02

10/14/02

10/14/02

10/15/02

10/16/02

10/16/02

11/27/02

11/27/02

DATE

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

NAME

1.50

0.15

0.50

0.75

1.50

1.00

1.00

0.50

1.00

3.50

1.50

1.50

0.25

0.15

0.50

0.75

1.00

ENTRY

1.50

0.15

0.50

0.75

1.50

1.00

1.00

0.50

1.00

3.50

1.50

1.50

0.25

0.15

0.50

0.75

1.00

COMBINED

375.00

37.50

125.00

187.50

375.00

250.00

250.00

125.00

250.00

875.00

375.00

375.00

62.50

37.50

125.00

187.50

250.00

COMBINED

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

193

205

206

219

220

221

222

226

227

228

250

251

252

257

258

364

365

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

REVIEW OF TRANSAMERICA'S APPENDIX ON ITS MSJ AGAINST SALES [DOC# 051]

REVIEW OF ORDER GRANTING SALES MOTION TO AMEND THIRD-PARTY COMPLAINT [DOC# 052]

REVIEW OF SALES' FIRST AMENDED 3RD PARTY COMPLAINT [DOC# 053]

THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT BERKLEY'S DESIGNATION OF EXPERT WITNESSES

REVIEW OF BERKLEY'S ANSWER TO SALES' 1ST AMENDED COMPLAINT [DOC# 054]

REVIEW OF TRANSAM'S ANSWER TO SALES' 1ST AMENDED COMPLAINT [DOC# 055]

REVIEW OF STANDARD'S ANSWER TO SALES' 1ST AMENDED COMPLAINT [DOC# 056]

THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT TRANSAM'S FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES TO THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT BERKLEY

THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANTS TRANSAM'S AND STANDARD SECURITY'S FIRST SET OF REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTSTO THIRD-PARTY DEFENDAN

THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANTS TRANSAM'S AND STANDARD SECURITY'S FIRST SET OF REQUESTS FOR ADMISSIONS TO THIRD-PARTYDEFENDANT BERKLEY

THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT TRANSAM'S OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES TO BERKLEY'S FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES

THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT TRANSAM'S OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES TO BERKLEY'S FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION

REVIEW OF BERKLEY'S MOTION TO FILE THIRD-PARTY COUNTERCLAIM [DOC# 060]

REVIEW OF ORDER ALLOWING BERKLEY TO FILE THIRD-PARTY COUNTERCLAIM [DOC# 061]

REVIEW OF BERKLEY'S 3RD PARTY COUNTERCLAIM [DOC# 062]

SSSI EMPLOYEE HEALTH CARE PLAN'S OBJECTIONS AND ANSWERS TO THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT, BERKLEY'S FIRST REQUEST FORPRODUCTION

SSSI'S OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES TO THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT, BERKLEY'S FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION

OTHER TASK~

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Tue

Wed

Wed

Tue

Mon

Mon

Mon

Tue

Tue

Wed

Mon

Mon

Tue

Wed

Wed

Wed

Wed

DESCRIPTION

INFORMATIONAL

HOURS HOURS HOURSFEES EXH.

MBD 126

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 267-2 Filed 01/31/2008 Page 126 of 153

Page 127: Doc 267-2 - Example legal fees audit by Stuart, Maue, Mitchell & James legal fees auditing firm (rebuttal also uploaded)

Manziel Law OfficesPLEADINGS AND DISCOVERY THAT APPEAR TO RELATE TO 3RD PARTY CLAIMS

EXHIBIT T

~ See the last page of exhibit for explanation

STUART MAUE

EXHIBIT T PAGE 5 of 12

11/27/02

11/27/02

12/06/02

12/06/02

12/06/02

12/06/02

12/07/02

12/28/02

01/17/03

01/17/03

01/17/03

01/17/03

01/20/03

01/20/03

02/04/03

DATE

Attorney

Attorney

Assistant

Assistant

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

NAME

0.75

0.50

1.00

2.00

3.00

3.25

2.00

1.50

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.50

1.00

ENTRY

0.75

0.50

1.00

2.00

3.00

3.25

2.00

1.50

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.50

1.00

COMBINED

187.50

125.00

75.00

150.00

750.00

812.50

500.00

375.00

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

125.00

250.00

COMBINED

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

366

367

379

381

378

380

382

417

446

447

448

449

452

453

464

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

SSSI EMPLOYEE HEALTH CARE PLAN'S OBJECTIONS AND ANSWERS TO THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT, BERKLEY'S FIRST SET OFINTERROGATORIES

SSSI'S OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES TO THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT, BERKLEY'S FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES

THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT BERKLEY'S OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES TO THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANTS TRANSAM'S AND STANDARDSECURITY'S FIRST SET OF

THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT BERKLEY'S OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES TO THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANTS TRANSAM'S AND STANDARDSECURITY'S FIRST SET OF

THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT BERKLEY'S OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES TO THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANTS TRANSAM'S AND STANDARDSECURITY'S FIRST SET OF

THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT BERKLEY'S OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES TO THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANTS TRANSAM'S AND STANDARDSECURITY'S FIRST SET OF

THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT BERKLEY'S OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES TO THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT TRANSAM'S FIRST SET OFINTERROGATORIES

THE EXCESS-LOSS INSURER'S MOTION TO COMPEL AND FOR SANCTIONS, FILED BY THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANTS TRANSAM ANDSTANDARD SECURITY AGAINS

NOTICE TO TAKE DEPOSITION OF KATHRYN INGENITO, BY THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT STANDARD SECURITY TO DEFENDANTS SSSLAND THIRD-PARTY DEFEN

NOTICE TO TAKE DEPOSITION OF JUDIE GOODLIFFE, BY THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT STANDARD SECURITY TO DEFENDANTS SSSL ANDTHIRD-PARTY DEFEND

NOTICE TO TAKE DEPOSITION OF KAREN HERMAN, BY THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT STANDARD SECURITY TO DEFENDANTS SSSI ANDTHIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT

NOTICE TO TAKE DEPOSITION OF WILLIAM GRENKER, BY THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT STANDARD SECURITY TO DEFENDANTS SSSI ANDTHIRD-PARTY DEFEND

NOTICE OF INTENTION TO TAKE THE DEPOSITION OF A CORPORATE REPRESENTATIVE OF STANDARD SECURITY, BY DEFENDANTSSSI ON 01/24/2003

THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT STANDARD SECURITY'S OBJECTIONS TO NOTICE OF INTENTION TO TAKE THE DEPOSITION OF ACORPORATE REPRESENTATIVE,

THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANTS TRANSAM'S AND STANDARD SECURITY'S SECOND SET OF REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTSTO DEFENDANTS, TO DEFE

OTHER TASK~

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Wed

Wed

Fri

Fri

Fri

Fri

Sat

Sat

Fri

Fri

Fri

Fri

Mon

Mon

Tue

DESCRIPTION

INFORMATIONAL

HOURS HOURS HOURSFEES EXH.

MBD 127

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 267-2 Filed 01/31/2008 Page 127 of 153

Page 128: Doc 267-2 - Example legal fees audit by Stuart, Maue, Mitchell & James legal fees auditing firm (rebuttal also uploaded)

Manziel Law OfficesPLEADINGS AND DISCOVERY THAT APPEAR TO RELATE TO 3RD PARTY CLAIMS

EXHIBIT T

~ See the last page of exhibit for explanation

STUART MAUE

EXHIBIT T PAGE 6 of 12

02/04/03

02/10/03

02/12/03

02/12/03

02/14/03

02/14/03

02/14/03

02/15/03

02/20/03

02/24/03

03/03/03

03/03/03

03/03/03

03/03/03

03/05/03

DATE

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Manziel, L

Attorney

Assistant

Assistant

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

NAME

0.75

0.50

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.75

1.50

0.75

2.50

0.25

ENTRY

0.75

0.50

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.75

1.50

0.75

2.50

0.25

COMBINED

187.50

125.00

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

62.50

56.25

112.50

187.50

625.00

62.50

COMBINED

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

465

467

468

469

470

471

472

474

477

479

492

494

491

493

496

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANTS TRANSAM'S AND STANDARD SECURITY'S SECOND SET OF REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTSTO THIRD-PARTY DEFENDA

NOTICE TO TAKE DEPOSITION OF BERKLEY, BY THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT TRANSAM ON 03/04/2003

AMENDED NOTICE TO TAKE DEPOSITION OF STEPHEN DUNSTON, BY THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT STANDARD SECURITY TODEFENDANTS SSSI AND THIRD-PART

AMENDED NOTICE TO TAKE DEPOSITION OF DONNA STONE, BY THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT TRANSAM TO DEFENDANTS SSSI ANDTHIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT BE

NOTICE TO TAKE DEPOSITION OF BRENDA CROSSON, BY THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT TRANSAM TO DEFENDANTS SSSI AND THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT BERKLEY

NOTICE TO TAKE DEPOSITION OF CHERYLE CHAFFIN, BY THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT TRANSAM TO DEFENDANTS SSSI AND THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT BERKLE

NOTICE TO TAKE DEPOSITION OF LOIS ELAINE DAVIS, BY THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT STANDARD SECURITY TO DEFENDANTS SSSI ANDTHIRD-PARTY DEFE

NOTICE OF INTENTION TO TAKE THE DEPOSITION OF A CORPORATE REPRESENTATIVE OF TRANSAM, BY DEFENDANT SSSI, ON02/21/2002 [MISTYPED DO

LAM REV. LETTER FROM WHITAKER RE: THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT TRANSAM'S OBJECTIONS TO NOTICE OF INTENTION TO TAKE THEDEPOSITION OF A CO

THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT TRANSAM'S OBJECTIONS TO NOTICE OF INTENTION TO TAKE THE DEPOSITION OF A CORPORATEREPRESENTATIVE, BY DEFENDA

THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT BERKLEY'S OBJECTIONS TO NOTICE TO TAKE DEPOSITION, BY THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT TRANSAM

THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT BERKLEY'S OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES TO THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANTS TRANSAM'S AND STANDARDSECURITY'S SECOND SET OF

THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT BERKLEY'S OBJECTIONS TO NOTICE TO TAKE DEPOSITION, BY THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT TRANSAM

THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT BERKLEY'S OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES TO THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANTS TRANSAM'S AND STANDARDSECURITY'S SECOND SET OF

REVIEW OF THIRD-PARTY LITIGANTS' MOTION TO EXTEND DISCOVERY DEADLINE FOR ADDITIONAL DEPOSITIONS [DOC# 082]

OTHER TASK~

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Tue

Mon

Wed

Wed

Fri

Fri

Fri

Sat

Thu

Mon

Mon

Mon

Mon

Mon

Wed

DESCRIPTION

INFORMATIONAL

HOURS HOURS HOURSFEES EXH.

MBD 128

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 267-2 Filed 01/31/2008 Page 128 of 153

Page 129: Doc 267-2 - Example legal fees audit by Stuart, Maue, Mitchell & James legal fees auditing firm (rebuttal also uploaded)

Manziel Law OfficesPLEADINGS AND DISCOVERY THAT APPEAR TO RELATE TO 3RD PARTY CLAIMS

EXHIBIT T

~ See the last page of exhibit for explanation

STUART MAUE

EXHIBIT T PAGE 7 of 12

03/06/03

03/06/03

04/09/03

04/30/03

04/30/03

04/30/03

04/30/03

04/30/03

04/30/03

05/02/03

05/02/03

05/13/03

05/14/03

06/02/03

06/02/03

06/02/03

06/02/03

DATE

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

NAME

0.15

1.50

0.25

2.50

1.75

2.50

2.25

2.50

0.25

2.00

2.00

0.25

0.15

2.00

2.50

2.00

2.25

ENTRY

0.15

1.50

0.25

2.50

1.75

2.50

2.25

2.50

0.25

2.00

2.00

0.25

0.15

2.00

2.50

2.00

2.25

COMBINED

37.50

375.00

62.50

625.00

437.50

625.00

562.50

625.00

62.50

500.00

500.00

62.50

37.50

500.00

625.00

500.00

562.50

COMBINED

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

504

505

519

526

527

528

529

530

531

532

533

547

548

549

550

551

552

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

REVIEW OF ORDER GRANTING THIRD-PARTY LITIGANTS' MOTION TO EXTEND DISCOVERY DEADLINE FOR ADDITIONAL DEPOSITIONS[DOC# 100]

DEFENDANTS RESPONSES AND OBJECTIONS TO TRANSAM'S AND STANDARD SECURITY'S SECOND SET OF REQUESTS FORPRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS; LAM R

NOTICE TO TAKE DEPOSITION OF CHRISTOPHER SILLITO, BY THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT TRANSAM, TO DEFENDANTS SSSL ANDTHIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT B

REVIEW OF EXCESS LOSS INSURERS' MSJ #1 [DOC# 113]

REVIEW OF BERKELEY'S MSJ #1 [DOC# 114]

REVIEW OF BERKLEY'S BRIEF ON BERKLEY'S MSJ #1 AGAINST SALES [DOC# 115]

REVIEW OF TRANSAMERICA'S BRIEF ON ITS MSJ #1 AGAINST SALES [DOC# 117]

REVIEW OF STANDARD'S BRIEF ON ITS MSJ #1 AGAINST SALES [DOC# 119]

REVIEW OF SALES' MOTION AND BRIEF TO FILE SECOND MSJ (RE INSURERS) [DOC# 120]

REVIEW OF SALES' MPSJ AGAINST TRANSAMERICA [DOC# 121]

REVIEW OF SALES BRIEF ON SALES' MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AGAINST TRANSAMERICA [DOC# 122]

REVIEW OF THIRD-PARTY LITIGANTS' AGREED MOTION TO EXTEND SUMMARY JUDGMENT BRIEFING AND RESPONSE SCHEDULE[DOC# 125]

REVIEW OF ORDER EXTENDING THIRD-PARTY SUMMARY JUDGMENT BRIEFING AND RESPONSE SCHEDULE [DOC# 126]

REVIEW OF TRANSAMERICA'S RESPONSE TO SALES' THIRD-PARTY MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT [DOC# 127]

REVIEW OF TRANSAMERICA'S BRIEF ON ITS RESPONSE TO SALES' THIRD-PARTY MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT [DOC#128]

REVIEW OF SALES' RESPONSE TO TRANSAMERICA'S MSJ #1 [DOC# 129]

REVIEW OF SALES' BRIEF ON SALES' RESPONSE TO TRANSAMERICA'S MSJ #1 [DOC# 130]

OTHER TASK~

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Thu

Thu

Wed

Wed

Wed

Wed

Wed

Wed

Wed

Fri

Fri

Tue

Wed

Mon

Mon

Mon

Mon

DESCRIPTION

INFORMATIONAL

HOURS HOURS HOURSFEES EXH.

MBD 129

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 267-2 Filed 01/31/2008 Page 129 of 153

Page 130: Doc 267-2 - Example legal fees audit by Stuart, Maue, Mitchell & James legal fees auditing firm (rebuttal also uploaded)

Manziel Law OfficesPLEADINGS AND DISCOVERY THAT APPEAR TO RELATE TO 3RD PARTY CLAIMS

EXHIBIT T

~ See the last page of exhibit for explanation

STUART MAUE

EXHIBIT T PAGE 8 of 12

06/02/03

06/02/03

06/02/03

06/02/03

06/23/03

06/23/03

06/23/03

06/23/03

06/23/03

06/23/03

07/07/03

07/14/03

07/21/03

08/11/03

08/26/03

11/19/04

11/19/04

11/26/04

DATE

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

NAME

2.25

2.25

2.25

2.75

0.25

0.50

1.50

1.25

1.00

1.00

0.25

0.25

0.50

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.15

0.50

ENTRY

2.25

2.25

2.25

2.75

0.25

0.50

1.50

1.25

1.00

1.00

0.25

0.25

0.50

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.15

0.50

COMBINED

562.50

562.50

562.50

687.50

62.50

125.00

375.00

312.50

250.00

250.00

62.50

62.50

125.00

62.50

62.50

62.50

37.50

125.00

COMBINED

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

02

02

02

553

554

555

556

561

562

563

564

565

566

568

569

570

571

572

160

170

190

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

REVIEW OF SALES' RESPONSE TO BERKLEY'S MSJ #1 [DOC# 131]

REVIEW OF SALES' BRIEF ON SALES' RESPONSE TO BERKLEY'S MSJ #1 [DOC# 132]

REVIEW OF SALES' RESPONSE TO STANDARD'S MSJ #1 [DOC# 133]

REVIEW OF SALES' BRIEF ON SALES' RESPONSE TO TRANSAMERICA'S MSJ #1 [DOC# 134]

REVIEW OF BERKLEY'S MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT SUMMARY JUDGMENT RECORD [DOC# 137]

REVIEW OF BERKLEY'S MOTION AND BRIEF TO STRIKE SALES' SUMMARY JDGM #1 ARGUMENTS AND EVIDENCE AGAINST BERKLEY[DOC# 138]

REVIEW OF BERKLEY'S REPLY TO SALES RESPONSE TO BERKLEY'S MSJ #1 AGAINST SALES [DOC# 139]

REVIEW OF SALES' REPLY TO TRANS' RESPONSE TO SALES' MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AGAINST TRANSAMERICA[DOC# 140]

REVIEW OF STANDARD'S REPLY TO SALES' RESPONSE TO STANDARD'S MSJ #1 AGAINST SALES [DOC# 141]

REVIEW OF TRANSAMERICA'S REPLY TO SALES' RESPONSE TO INSURERS' MSJ #1 AGAINST SALES [DOC# 142]

REVIEW OF SALES' ANSWER TO 3RD PARTY COUNTERCLAIM [DOC# 145]

REVIEW OF SALES' RESPONSE TO BERKLEY'S MOTION TO STRIKE SALES' MSJ EVIDENCE AND ARGUMENTS AGAINST BERKLEY [DOC#146]

REVIEW OF BERKLEY'S MOTION AND BRIEF TO STRIKE SALES' ANSWER TO COUNTERCLAIM [DOC# 147]

REVIEW OF SALES' BRIEF AND RESPONSE TO BERKLEY'S MOTION TO STRIKE SALES' ANSWER TO COUNTERCLAIM [DOC# 149]

REVIEW OF BERKLEY'S REPLY TO SALES' RESPONSE TO BERKLEY'S MOTION TO STRIKE SALES' COUNTERCLAIM ANSWER [DOC# 150]

REVIEW OF THIRD-PARTY'S DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF

REVIEW OF ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR TRANSAMERICA AND STANDARD TO FILE BRIEF

REVIEW OF BERLKEY'S APPELLATE BRIEF

OTHER TASK~

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Mon

Mon

Mon

Mon

Mon

Mon

Mon

Mon

Mon

Mon

Mon

Mon

Mon

Mon

Tue

Fri

Fri

Fri

DESCRIPTION

INFORMATIONAL

HOURS HOURS HOURSFEES EXH.

MBD 130

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 267-2 Filed 01/31/2008 Page 130 of 153

Page 131: Doc 267-2 - Example legal fees audit by Stuart, Maue, Mitchell & James legal fees auditing firm (rebuttal also uploaded)

Manziel Law OfficesPLEADINGS AND DISCOVERY THAT APPEAR TO RELATE TO 3RD PARTY CLAIMS

EXHIBIT T

~ See the last page of exhibit for explanation

STUART MAUE

EXHIBIT T PAGE 9 of 12

12/10/04

12/10/04

12/10/04

01/12/05

01/25/05

01/31/06

01/31/06

01/31/06

01/31/06

01/31/06

01/31/06

01/31/06

01/31/06

02/21/06

02/21/06

02/21/06

02/21/06

02/21/06

DATE

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Assistant

Assistant

Assistant

Assistant

Attorney

NAME

0.25

4.50

0.15

2.00

2.00

3.50

4.00

6.00

4.00

7.00

6.00

2.00

3.00

1.00

2.00

4.00

2.00

0.25

ENTRY

0.25

4.50

0.15

2.00

2.00

3.50

4.00

6.00

4.00

7.00

6.00

2.00

3.00

1.00

2.00

4.00

2.00

0.25

COMBINED

62.50

1,125.00

37.50

500.00

500.00

875.00

1,000.00

1,500.00

1,000.00

1,750.00

1,500.00

500.00

750.00

75.00

150.00

300.00

150.00

62.50

COMBINED

02

02

02

02

02

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

200

210

220

230

240

746

747

748

749

750

751

756

757

821

823

831

833

818

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

REVIEW SALES' MOTION TO FILE CONSOLIDATED REPLY IN THIRD-PARTY APPEAL

REVIEW OF TRANSAMERICA'S/STANDARD'S BRIEF

REVIEW OF ORDER ALLOWING SALES TO FILE CONSOLIDATED REPLY/BRIEF IN THIRD-PARTY APPEAL

REVIEW OF SALES' BRIEF ON THIRD-PARTY APPEAL

REVIEW OF TRANSAMERICA'S/STANDARDS' REPLY BRIEF ON THIRD-PARTY APPEAL

REVIEW OF BERKLEY'S RENEWED MOT TO STRIKE SALES' ANSWER TO COUNTERCLAIM [DOC# 180]

REVIEW OF BERKLEY'S RENEWED MSJ [DOC# 181]

REVIEW OF BERKLEY'S BRIEF SUPPORTING ITS RENEWED MSJ [DOC# 182]

REVIEW OF TRANSAMERICA & STANDARD'S RENEWED MSJ [DOC# 183]

REVIEW OF TRANSAMERICA'S BRIEF SUPPORTING ITS RENEWED MSJ [DOC# 184]

REVIEW OF STANDARD'S BRIEF SUPPORTING ITS RENEWED MSJ [DOC# 185]

REVIEW OF SALES MPSJ (#2) V. TRANSAMERICA [DOC# 188]

REVIEW OF SALES BRIEF ON SALES MSJ#2 V. TRANSAMERICA [DOC# 189]

REVIEW OF TRANSAMERICA'S RESPONSE TO SALES MPSJ [DOC# 194]

REVIEW OF TRANSAMERICA'S BRIEF RE RESPONSE TO SALES MPSJ [DOC# 195]

REVIEW OF BRIEF RE SALES RESPONSE TO REINSURER'S MSJ [DOC# 200]

REVIEW OF SALES BRIEF RE RESPONSE TO STANDARD'S MSJ [DOC# 201]

REVIEW OF AGREED MOTION EXTENDING TIME FOR SALES TO RESPOND TO REINSURERS' MOT TO STRIKE 3RD PARTY CLAIM [DOC#192]

OTHER TASK~

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Fri

Fri

Fri

Wed

Tue

Tue

Tue

Tue

Tue

Tue

Tue

Tue

Tue

Tue

Tue

Tue

Tue

Tue

DESCRIPTION

INFORMATIONAL

HOURS HOURS HOURSFEES EXH.

MBD 131

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 267-2 Filed 01/31/2008 Page 131 of 153

Page 132: Doc 267-2 - Example legal fees audit by Stuart, Maue, Mitchell & James legal fees auditing firm (rebuttal also uploaded)

Manziel Law OfficesPLEADINGS AND DISCOVERY THAT APPEAR TO RELATE TO 3RD PARTY CLAIMS

EXHIBIT T

~ See the last page of exhibit for explanation

STUART MAUE

EXHIBIT T PAGE 10 of 12

02/21/06

02/21/06

02/21/06

02/21/06

02/21/06

02/28/06

02/28/06

02/28/06

02/28/06

03/08/06

03/08/06

03/08/06

03/08/06

03/14/06

03/15/06

03/15/06

03/15/06

04/04/06

04/17/06

DATE

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Assistant

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

Attorney

NAME

3.00

6.50

0.25

16.00

12.00

0.25

3.50

2.50

0.75

1.50

7.50

2.50

3.50

0.25

2.00

1.00

2.50

0.75

1.00

ENTRY

3.00

6.50

0.25

16.00

12.00

0.25

3.50

2.50

0.75

1.50

7.50

2.50

3.50

0.25

2.00

1.00

2.50

0.75

1.00

COMBINED

750.00

1,625.00

62.50

4,000.00

3,000.00

62.50

875.00

625.00

187.50

112.50

1,875.00

625.00

875.00

62.50

500.00

250.00

625.00

187.50

250.00

COMBINED

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

820

822

829

830

832

846

847

848

849

859

858

860

865

879

880

881

882

903

908

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

REVIEW OF TRANSAMERICA'S RESPONSE TO SALES MPSJ [DOC# 194]

REVIEW OF TRANSAMERICA'S BRIEF RE RESPONSE TO SALES MPSJ [DOC# 195]

REVIEW OF SALES RESPONSE TO REINSURER'S MSJ [DOC# 199]

REVIEW OF BRIEF RE SALES RESPONSE TO REINSURER'S MSJ [DOC# 200]

REVIEW OF SALES BRIEF RE RESPONSE TO STANDARD'S MSJ [DOC# 201]

REVIEW OF SALES RESPONSE TO BERKLEY'S MSJ [DOC# 205]

REVIEW OF SALES BRIEF ON SALES RESPONSE TO BERKLEY'S MSJ [DOC# 206]

REVIEW OF SALES SUPPLEMENTAL APPENDIX FOR RESPONSE TO BERKLEY'S MSJ [DOC# 207]

REVIEW OF SALES RESPONSE TO BERKLEY'S MOT TO STRIKE SALES ANSWER TO COUNTERCLAIM [DOC# 208]

REVIEW OF STANDARD'S REPLY ON EXCESS INSURER'S RENEWED MSJ [DOC# 209]

REVIEW OF STANDARD'S REPLY ON EXCESS INSURER'S RENEWED MSJ [DOC# 209]

REVIEW OF STANDARD'S REPLY BRIEF ON EXCESS INSURER'S RENEWED MSJ [DOC# 210]

REVIEW OF SALES' REPLY BRIEF ON SALES MSJ V. TRANAMERICA [DOC# 214]

REVIEW OF SALES WITHDRAWAL OF OBJECTION TO TRANSAM RESPONSE BRIEF [DOC# 217]

REVIEW OF BERKLEY'S REPLY SUPPORTING ITS MOT TO STRIKE SALES' ANSWER TO COUNTERCLAIM [DOC# 218]

REVIEW OF BERKLEY'S MOTION TO STRIKE SALES MSJ [DOC# 219]

REVIEW OF BERKLEY'S RENEWED REPLY TO SALES RESPONSE TO BERKLEY'S MSJ [DOC# 220]

REVIEW OF SALES RESPONSE TO BERKLEY'S MOTION TO STRIKE SALES MSJ [DOC# 221]

REVIEW OF BERKLEY'S REPLY SUPPORTING ITS MOTION TO STRIKE SALES MSJ V. BERKLEY [DOC# 222]

OTHER TASK~

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Tue

Tue

Tue

Tue

Tue

Tue

Tue

Tue

Tue

Wed

Wed

Wed

Wed

Tue

Wed

Wed

Wed

Tue

Mon

DESCRIPTION

INFORMATIONAL

HOURS HOURS HOURSFEES EXH.

MBD 132

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 267-2 Filed 01/31/2008 Page 132 of 153

Page 133: Doc 267-2 - Example legal fees audit by Stuart, Maue, Mitchell & James legal fees auditing firm (rebuttal also uploaded)

Manziel Law OfficesPLEADINGS AND DISCOVERY THAT APPEAR TO RELATE TO 3RD PARTY CLAIMS

EXHIBIT T

~ See the last page of exhibit for explanation

STUART MAUE

EXHIBIT T PAGE 11 of 12

238.70 $56,875.00

09/28/06

DATE

Attorney

NAME

0.15

ENTRY

0.15

COMBINED

37.50

COMBINED

01 963

Total

1 REVIEW OF ORDER STRIKING SSSI'S ANSWER TO BERKLEY'S COUNTERCLAIM [DOC# 230]

OTHER TASK~

/Thu

DESCRIPTION

INFORMATIONAL

HOURS HOURS HOURSFEES EXH.

Number of Entries: 156

MBD 133

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 267-2 Filed 01/31/2008 Page 133 of 153

Page 134: Doc 267-2 - Example legal fees audit by Stuart, Maue, Mitchell & James legal fees auditing firm (rebuttal also uploaded)

Manziel Law OfficesPLEADINGS AND DISCOVERY THAT APPEAR TO RELATE TO 3RD PARTY CLAIMS

EXHIBIT T

STUART MAUE

EXHIBIT T PAGE 12 of 12

AssistantAttorneyManziel, L

TIMEKEEPER HOURS FEES HOURS FEES HOURS FEES HOURS FEES HOURS FEESISOLATED BLOCKED MAXIMUM PROPORTIONAL COMBINED

(~) REASONS FOR TASK HOUR ASSIGNMENTS

238.70 $56,875.00 0.00 $0.00 238.70 $56,875.00 0.00 $0.00 238.70 $56,875.00

16.00 222.20

0.50

1,200.00 55,550.00

125.00

0.00 0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00 0.00

16.00 222.20

0.50

1,200.00 55,550.00

125.00

0.00 0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00 0.00

16.00 222.20

0.50

1,200.00 55,550.00

125.00

RANGE OF HOURS

RANGE OF FEES

SUMMARY OF HOURS AND FEES BY INDIVIDUAL

MBD 134

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 267-2 Filed 01/31/2008 Page 134 of 153

Page 135: Doc 267-2 - Example legal fees audit by Stuart, Maue, Mitchell & James legal fees auditing firm (rebuttal also uploaded)

Manziel Law OfficesTASKS FOR 37 HOURS TO COMPILE & ORGANIZE APPENDIX FOR MSJ RESPONSE

EXHIBIT U

STUART MAUE

EXHIBIT U PAGE 1 of 3

AssistantAttorney

HOURS FEESTIMEKEEPER

5.00 32.00

375.00 8,000.00

37.00 $8,375.00

COMBINED COMBINED

MBD 135

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 267-2 Filed 01/31/2008 Page 135 of 153

Page 136: Doc 267-2 - Example legal fees audit by Stuart, Maue, Mitchell & James legal fees auditing firm (rebuttal also uploaded)

Manziel Law OfficesTASKS FOR 37 HOURS TO COMPILE & ORGANIZE APPENDIX FOR MSJ RESPONSE

EXHIBIT U

~ See the last page of exhibit for explanation

STUART MAUE

EXHIBIT U PAGE 2 of 3

37.00 $8,375.00

02/21/06

02/21/06

DATE

Assistant

Attorney

NAME

5.00

32.00

ENTRY

5.00

32.00

COMBINED

375.00

8,000.00

COMBINED

01

01

828

827

Total

1

1

COMPILE AND ORGANIZE APPENDIX FOR HARRIS RESPONSE TO SALES 2ND MSJ [DOC# 198]

COMPILE AND ORGANIZE APPENDIX FOR HARRIS RESPONSE TO SALES 2ND MSJ [DOC# 198]

OTHER TASK~

/

/

Tue

Tue

DESCRIPTION

INFORMATIONAL

HOURS HOURS HOURSFEES EXH.

Number of Entries: 2

MBD 136

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 267-2 Filed 01/31/2008 Page 136 of 153

Page 137: Doc 267-2 - Example legal fees audit by Stuart, Maue, Mitchell & James legal fees auditing firm (rebuttal also uploaded)

Manziel Law OfficesTASKS FOR 37 HOURS TO COMPILE & ORGANIZE APPENDIX FOR MSJ RESPONSE

EXHIBIT U

STUART MAUE

EXHIBIT U PAGE 3 of 3

AssistantAttorney

TIMEKEEPER HOURS FEES HOURS FEES HOURS FEES HOURS FEES HOURS FEESISOLATED BLOCKED MAXIMUM PROPORTIONAL COMBINED

(~) REASONS FOR TASK HOUR ASSIGNMENTS

37.00 $8,375.00 0.00 $0.00 37.00 $8,375.00 0.00 $0.00 37.00 $8,375.00

5.00 32.00

375.00 8,000.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

5.00 32.00

375.00 8,000.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

5.00 32.00

375.00 8,000.00

RANGE OF HOURS

RANGE OF FEES

SUMMARY OF HOURS AND FEES BY INDIVIDUAL

MBD 137

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 267-2 Filed 01/31/2008 Page 137 of 153

Page 138: Doc 267-2 - Example legal fees audit by Stuart, Maue, Mitchell & James legal fees auditing firm (rebuttal also uploaded)

Appendix in Support of Plaintiff Harris M ethodist Ft. Worth 's Response to Sales Support's (Second)

Motion for Summary Judgment as to Harris - Page 1 (Bates Nos. 841 - 861)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTNORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH DIVISION

HARRIS METHODIST FT. WORTH, § FILED ELECTRONICALLYPlaintiff, § on February 21, 2006

§v. §

§SALES SUPPORT SERVICES, INC. §EMPLOYEE HEALTH CARE PLAN §and SALES SUPPORT SERVICES, §INC. § Defendants and §

Third-Party Plaintiffs §§ CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:01-CV-0567-Y§§

TRANSAMERICA LIFE INSURANCE §AND ANNUITY COMPANY, §STANDARD SECURITY LIFE §INSURANCE COMPANY OF §NEW YORK and BERKLEY RISK §MANAGERS, §

Third-Party Defendants. §

APPENDIX IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFHARRIS METHODIST FT. WORTH'S

RESPONSE TO SALES SUPPORT'S (SECOND)MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AS TO HARRIS

Plaintiff Harris Methodist Ft. Worth (“Harris”) submits this Appendix in Support of

Plaintiff Harris Methodist Ft. Worth's Response to Sales Support's (Second) Motion for

Summary Judgment as to Harris, containing:

(1) Affidavit of Tim Broadhurst ( Bates numbers 841 - 855 )

(2) Deposition of Jill Kraatz ( Bates numbers 856 - 861 )

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 198 Filed 02/21/2006 Page 1 of 23

MBD 138

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 267-2 Filed 01/31/2008 Page 138 of 153

Page 139: Doc 267-2 - Example legal fees audit by Stuart, Maue, Mitchell & James legal fees auditing firm (rebuttal also uploaded)

Appendix in Support of Plaintiff Harris M ethodist Ft. Worth 's Response to Sales Support's (Second)

Motion for Summary Judgment as to Harris - Page 2 (Bates Nos. 841 - 861)

Respectfully submitted,

s/ Lisa A. Manziel Lisa A. ManzielManziel Law OfficesSBN: 12957595E-Mail: [email protected] Meadow Road, Suite 100Dallas, TX 75231Telephone: 214-369-5500Facsimile: 214-369-5553

ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFFHARRIS METHODIST FORT WORTH

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that this document is being filed electronically pursuant to the Courts'Order Assigning Case to Electronic Case Filing, Docket Number 173, and that Mr. RichardE. Aubin, Mr. Robert M. Candee and Mr. Andrew C. Whitaker will be notified through theCourt's CM/ECF system of the filing of this document on the date of filing, February 21,2006.

s/ Lisa A. Manziel Lisa A. Manziel

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 198 Filed 02/21/2006 Page 2 of 23

MBD 139

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 267-2 Filed 01/31/2008 Page 139 of 153

Page 140: Doc 267-2 - Example legal fees audit by Stuart, Maue, Mitchell & James legal fees auditing firm (rebuttal also uploaded)

______________________________________________________________________________AFFIDAVIT OF T IM BRO ADHURST - Page 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTNORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH DIVISION

HARRIS METHODIST FT. WORTH, §Plaintiff, §

§v. §

§SALES SUPPORT SERVICES, INC. §EMPLOYEE HEALTH CARE PLAN §et al, § CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:01-CV-0567-Y Defendants and §

Third-Party Plaintiffs §§

v. §§

TRANSAMERICA LIFE INSURANCE §AND ANNUITY COMPANY, et al, §

Third-Party Defendants. §

AFFIDAVIT OF TIM BROADHURST

State of Texas §County of Travis §

Before me, the undersigned notary public, personally appeared Tim Broadhurst, who, on hisoath, stated as follows:

1. "My name is Tim Broadhurst. I am over the age of 18 and am in all ways competent tomake this affidavit.

2. "I am Manager (Manager V) of Third Party Recovery of the Office of the InspectorGeneral and have been so for 3.5 years. Prior to my current role I served as the Third PartyRecovery Director at NHIC, the vendor responsible for the Administration of Medicaid claims inTexas. Attached as Exhibit A is the job description from HHSC for my position. My duties inthat position include coordinating third party liability activities with appropriate organizationalunits within the Texas Health and Human Services Commission ("HHSC"), including third partyrecovery activities of the Texas Medicaid Program. I have been involved with the TexasMedicaid Program since 1994. I make this Affidavit in my official capacity and the facts setforth in this Affidavit are true and correct within my personal knowledge accumulated in thecourse of my employment with HHSC.

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 198 Filed 02/21/2006 Page 3 of 23

MBD 140

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 267-2 Filed 01/31/2008 Page 140 of 153

Page 141: Doc 267-2 - Example legal fees audit by Stuart, Maue, Mitchell & James legal fees auditing firm (rebuttal also uploaded)

______________________________________________________________________________AFFIDAVIT OF T IM BRO ADHURST - Page 2

3. "This Affidavit also supplements and corrects some information in the Affidavit ofRachel Vasquez executed on March 26, 2003, referred to herein as the "Plaintiff's VasquezAffidavit", which I have read in its entirety, including the Exhibits attached thereto. RachelVasquez is now a Program Specialist IV of Third Party Recovery for HHSC who reports directlyunder my management.

4. "On January 1, 2004, HHSC transferred Medicaid claims and Primary Care CaseManagement operations from National Heritage Insurance Company ("NHIC") to the TexasMedicaid & Healthcare Partnership (TMHP). On September 1, 2004, the Texas Department ofHealth (TDH) became part of the Texas Department of State Health Services (DSHS), which isan agency of the Texas Health and Human Services Commission. The Texas Department ofHuman Services (DHS), ceased operations on Sept. 1, 2004 and the Medicaid-related medicalassistance program services formerly provided by DHS are now provided through HHSC. Thevarious reshufflings of DHS, TDH, NHIC, TMHP, etc., have no substantive effect on rights orresponsibilities of persons and organizations that applied for Texas Medicaid, submitted claimsto Texas Medicaid, received payment from Texas Medicaid, or are obligated to pay or refundmonies to Texas Medicaid.

5. "Exhibit A of Plaintiff's Vasquez Affidavit consists of three pages from the 1998 TexasMedicaid Provider Procedures Manual ("Manual"). That Manual was an official publication ofthe Texas Department of Health and states official Department policies and interpretations thatTexas Medicaid providers are required to follow. Because the Medicaid claims and paymentswere made in 1998, that Manual still applies to these claims.

6. "The regulations in Exhibit B of Plaintiff's Vasquez Affidavit became effective April 30,1999 so they do not apply to the Twins' Medicaid claim or related Medicaid refund issues. Theearlier Texas Medicaid third-party recovery rules are applicable to the Twins' claims. They werepublished in Texas Register, Volume 19, Number 1, January 4, 1994 and the relevant text isattached as Exhibit C. However, based on the regulations cited in Plaintiff's Vasquez AffidavitExhibit B, Texas Medicaid's 110-day Rule continues to apply without substantive change to newclaims involving third-party resources.

7. "Regarding Exhibit C of Plaintiff's Vasquez Affidavit, these records of Texas Medicaidconstitute a domestic record of official activity regularly conducted by Texas Medicaid. Therecords also constitute a memorandum, report or record of acts and events, i.e., claimssubmissions to Texas Medicaid. The records were made at or near the time of the events by, orfrom information transmitted by, a person with knowledge. Texas Medicaid "made a record" bystoring documents submitted to it by Harris Methodist. The records were kept by TexasMedicaid in the course of its regularly conducted official activities. It was the regular practice ofTexas Medicaid to make the memorandum, report or record. Texas Medicaid relies upon theaccuracy of such records in the conduct of its activities.

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 198 Filed 02/21/2006 Page 4 of 23

MBD 141

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 267-2 Filed 01/31/2008 Page 141 of 153

Page 142: Doc 267-2 - Example legal fees audit by Stuart, Maue, Mitchell & James legal fees auditing firm (rebuttal also uploaded)

______________________________________________________________________________AFFIDAVIT OF T IM BRO ADHURST - Page 3

8. "Further regarding Exhibit C of Plaintiff's Vasquez Affidavit, Texas Medicaid maintainsthat the record constitutes an accurate copy of what was submitted to Texas Medicaid. TexasMedicaid did not prepare the documents submitted and makes no representation regarding anyinformation contained in the documents.

9. "Texas Human Resources Code Section 32.033, effective September 1, 1979, a copy ofwhich is attached hereto as Exhibit B, is the basis for the statutory assignment described inparagraph 8 of Plaintiff's Vasquez Affidavit. Section 32.033(e) indicates that Medicaid's right ofrecovery and subrogation rights are limited to claims paid by the department.

10. "Harris Methodist Ft. Worth is and at all relevant times was a participating provider inTexas Medicaid and, as such, must accept Texas Medicaid payment for services as payment infull from Medicaid unless another payor is primary. If Harris Methodist complied with thenotice requirements in the Manual, which Exhibit C of Plaintiff's Vasquez Affidavit indicates itdid, then Harris Methodist is not barred by Medicaid statutes or regulations from pursuingrecovery from the primary payor, as provided for in statutes, regulations, and the official Manualdescribed herein. That is the official policy and interpretation of Texas Medicaid on the questionof whether a provider that has accepted payment from Texas Medicaid may pursue recovery of agreater amount from a primary payor and upon receipt of payment from the payor the providermay retain any amount in excess of the Medicaid payment.

11. "If Harris Methodist recovers benefits on the Twins' claims from any primary payor andTexas Medicaid paid on such claims, Texas Medicaid's right to a refund remains in force andHarris Methodist must refund Texas Medicaid up to the amount Texas Medicaid paid.

12. "It is Medicaid's position that any time limit on a Medicaid provider's obligation to refundTexas Medicaid starts to run when the provider receives payment from the third-party resource,not when Medicaid originally pays the claim.

13. "Harris Methodist has not refunded to Texas Medicaid any portion of the payments madeby Texas Medicaid as described in Plaintiff's Vasquez Affidavit. Any refunds owed to TexasMedicaid as a result of a payment by Texas Medicaid should be made by Harris Methodistdirectly to Texas Medicaid, not to any other state agency or subcontractor.

14. "The following Exhibits are attached to and incorporated into this Affidavit:

Exhibit A: Job description for Tim BroadhurstExhibit B: Texas Human Resources Code Section 32.033.Exhibit C: Texas Medicaid's third-party claim rules applicable to the Twins' claims."

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 198 Filed 02/21/2006 Page 5 of 23

MBD 142

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 267-2 Filed 01/31/2008 Page 142 of 153

Page 143: Doc 267-2 - Example legal fees audit by Stuart, Maue, Mitchell & James legal fees auditing firm (rebuttal also uploaded)

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 198 Filed 02/21/2006 Page 6 of 23

MBD 143

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 267-2 Filed 01/31/2008 Page 143 of 153

Page 144: Doc 267-2 - Example legal fees audit by Stuart, Maue, Mitchell & James legal fees auditing firm (rebuttal also uploaded)

Health and Human Services Commission

Functional Job Description

AFFIDAVIT OF TIM BROADHURST -- EXHIBIT A - Page 2 TRC053 (06/01) Page 2 of 5

Functional Title OIG Third Party Review Manager Classification Title Manager V

E or M Essential/Marginal Job Functions/Performance Standards

1. (E) Oversees the performance of the fiscal agent vendor and its subcontractors as it relates to TPR, HIPP, certain accounts receivables, and cash functions. Develops program integrity strategies and manages various functions within program integrity to include management of staff who conduct Third Party Liability.

a. Manages the Third Party Liability process, to include HIPP, by developing and implementing strategies, policies, procedures, and tools that result in increased recoveries, cost avoidance, and direct savings.

b. Oversees the performance of the fiscal agent vendor to insure maximum benefits to the state as it relates to third party recovery, subrogation receipts, cost avoidance, and enrollment in the HIPP program, and compliance with contractual or regulatory requirements.

c. Recommends appropriate administrative actions, to include liquidated damages or other remedies, in those instances where the fiscal agent vendor or its subcontractors fail to meet contractual or regulatory requirements or caused the loss of third party resources.

d. Develops policies, guidelines, procedures, and standards to achieve established goals for program integrity functions within the OIG.

e. Develops policies, guidelines, procedures, and standards to expand, as mandated by legislation or leadership direction, enrollment in the HIPP program and subrogation receipts and cost avoidance.

f. Develops revisions to the OIG policies to rectify problems or issues that may impede achievement of established goals. g. Represents the OIG at meetings with third party insurers, the fiscal agent vendor and its subcontractors, legal counsel, providers, and other entities to achieve maximum recoveries and receipts for the OIG and HHSC.

2. (E) Coordinates activities with designated third party insurers, employers, recipients, providers, and others with an interest in the civil sanctions and third party liability programs of the OIG.

a. Develops policies, guidelines, procedures, and standards to achieve full coordination of common program integrity activities and minimize duplication of effort across these agencies.

b. Coordinates meetings with these agencies to facilitate the implementation of legislative and directives requiring coordination across agencies.

c. 3. (E) Coordinates third party liability activities involving health and human services agencies, to include

developing standards within these agencies and managing a uniform referral process. a. Develops policies, guidelines, procedures, and standards to achieve full coordination of

common third party liability activities and minimize duplication of effort across these agencies. b. Coordinates meetings with these agencies to facilitate the implementation of legislative and

directives requiring coordination across agencies.

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 198 Filed 02/21/2006 Page 8 of 23

MBD 144

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 267-2 Filed 01/31/2008 Page 144 of 153

Page 145: Doc 267-2 - Example legal fees audit by Stuart, Maue, Mitchell & James legal fees auditing firm (rebuttal also uploaded)

Health and Human Services Commission

Functional Job Description

AFFIDAVIT OF TIM BROADHURST -- EXHIBIT A - Page 3 TRC053 (06/01) Page 3 of 5

Functional Title OIG Third Party Review Manager Classification Title Manager V

c. Develops policies, standards, and procedures for the agencies to follow as it relates to the identification of other insurance, HIPP, liable third party, TORT, and other subrogation activities.

d. Provides technical assistance and support to the agencies. 4. (E) Directs activities of staff within program areas and provides direction to staff within other organization

areas of the OIG as it relates to Third Party activities and goals. a. Provides direction to staff for achieving stated program goals and other mandates. b. Provides direction to staff to ensure compliance with OIG policies and procedures, as well as

compliance with state and federal rules, guidelines, and regulations. c. Provides direction to staff for conducting activities appropriately and in compliance with agency

policies, procedures, and guidelines. d. Mentors and counsels employees to develop their performance and coordinates training for

staff in areas required as well as areas to develop their job skills. e. Coordinates third party liability activities with all organizational units within the OIG, to eliminate

duplication of effort and insure policies and initiatives are implemented in a consistent manner. f. Coordinates third party liability activities with appropriate organizational units within HHSC,

such as the Office of the General Counsel, the Medicaid/CHIP division, and Financial Management.

5. (E) Establishes and maintains effective working relationships and communications with staff, contractors, other functions within HHSC, and other public and private organizations, including attending business meetings, seminars, hearings, or other committee meetings.

a. Maintains effective working relationships and effective communications with contractors and other business contacts.

b. Responds to management inquiries. c. Responds to assigned legislative inquiries. d. Appropriately participates in meetings, hearings, and committees.

Knowledge, Skills, and Abilities Each KSA must have “Relates to E/MJF _____” and the appropriate number(s) after each statement.

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 198 Filed 02/21/2006 Page 9 of 23

MBD 145

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 267-2 Filed 01/31/2008 Page 145 of 153

Page 146: Doc 267-2 - Example legal fees audit by Stuart, Maue, Mitchell & James legal fees auditing firm (rebuttal also uploaded)

Health and Human Services Commission

Functional Job Description

AFFIDAVIT OF TIM BROADHURST -- EXHIBIT A - Page 4 TRC053 (06/01) Page 4 of 5

Functional Title OIG Third Party Review Manager Classification Title Manager V

a. Knowledge of policies and procedures for the Texas Medicaid program and its operating agencies. Relates to E/MJF 1-4.

b. Knowledge of acceptable and appropriate management and strategic planning techniques, to include analysis, planning, measurement, and achievement of established goals. Relates to E/MJF 1-3.

c. Knowledge of federal and state Medicaid laws, regulations, and policies. Relates to E/MJF 1-4. d. Knowledge of Third Party Liability requirements as it relates to the Medicaid program. Relates to

E/MJF 2, 3, 4, and 5. e. Knowledge of the Medicaid operating agencies programs, guidelines, procedures, and processes.

Relates to E/MJF 1-5. f. Knowledge of fiscal agent and claims administrator procedures for accounts receivable and cash, to

include recoupments, vendor holds, and related reporting and recording procedures. Relates to E/MJF 1 and 3.

g. Knowledge of the State Medicaid Manual requirement for Third Party Liability and the Health Insurance Premium Payment Program (HIPP), including those involving the MMIS and its subsystems. Relates to E/MJF 2 and 3.

h. Knowledge of claims administration and fiscal agent procedures. Relates to E/MJF 1-4. i. Knowledge of the OIG’s operating procedures as well as the OIG’s enabling legislation and HHSC

policies and procedures. Relates to E/MJF 1-5. j. Knowledge of management principles and preferred business practices. Relates to E/MJF 5 and 5. k. Knowledge of program planning, implementation, and evaluation. Relates to E/MJF 5 and 5. l. Skill in managing multiple, sometimes conflicting, priorities without jeopardizing deadlines or system

milestones. Relates to E/MJF 1-5. m. Skill in presenting complex concepts and information. Relates to E/MJF 1-5. n. Skill in collecting and analyzing complex data, evaluating information, and drawing logical conclusions

in a prescribed report format. Relates to E/MJF 1-5. o. Ability to manage program activities. Relates to E/MJF 1-5. p. Ability to establish goals and objectives and devise solutions to administrative problems. Relates to

E/MJF 1-5. q. Ability to evaluate and develop administrative policies, procedures, and guidelines. Relates to E/MJF

1-4. r. Ability to gather, assemble, correlate, and analyze complex facts. Relates to E/MJF 1-4. s. Ability to write concise reports. Relates to E/MJF 1-4. t. Ability to plan, assign, and supervise the work of others. Relates to E/MJF 1-5. u. Ability to communicate effectively both orally and in writing. Relates to E/MJF 1-5.

Education and Training Graduation from an accredited four-year college or university with a major in business administration or public administration or a related field. Each additional year of experience in excess of the required eight years may be substituted for each year of college on a year-for-year basis.

Experience Eight years full-time experience in the administration of a program or activity relevant to health and human services, preferably in the Medicaid program. Five years in the supervision or management of professional staff or management of complex programs.

Career Progression Requirements

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 198 Filed 02/21/2006 Page 10 of 23

MBD 146

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 267-2 Filed 01/31/2008 Page 146 of 153

Page 147: Doc 267-2 - Example legal fees audit by Stuart, Maue, Mitchell & James legal fees auditing firm (rebuttal also uploaded)

Health and Human Services Commission

Functional Job Description

AFFIDAVIT OF TIM BROADHURST -- EXHIBIT A - Page 5 TRC053 (06/01) Page 5 of 5

Functional Title OIG Third Party Review Manager Classification Title Manager V

Not applicable at this time. Date of FJD Revision

mo./yr. – new or revised

12/03 - new

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 198 Filed 02/21/2006 Page 11 of 23

MBD 147

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 267-2 Filed 01/31/2008 Page 147 of 153

Page 148: Doc 267-2 - Example legal fees audit by Stuart, Maue, Mitchell & James legal fees auditing firm (rebuttal also uploaded)

AFFIDAVIT OF BROADHURST, EXHIBIT "B" Human Resources Code § 32.003. DEFINITIONS. In this chapter: (3) "Department" means the Health and Human Services Commission or an agency operating part of the medical assistance program, as appropriate. Human Resources Code § 32.033. Subrogation (a) The filing of an application for or receipt of medical assistance constitutes an assignment of the applicant's or recipient's right of recovery from:

(1) personal insurance;

(2) other sources; or

(3) another person for personal injury caused by the other person's negligence or wrong. (b) A person who applies for or receives medical assistance shall inform the department, at the time of application or at any time during eligibility and receipt of services, of any unsettled tort claim which may affect medical needs and of any private accident or sickness insurance coverage that is or may become available. A recipient shall inform the department of any injury requiring medical attention that is caused by the act or failure to act of some other person. An applicant or a recipient shall inform the department as required by this subsection within 60 days of the date the person learns of his or her insurance coverage, tort claim, or potential cause of action. An applicant or a recipient who knowingly and intentionally fails to disclose the information required by this subsection commits a Class C misdemeanor. (c) A claim for damages for personal injury does not constitute grounds for denying or discontinuing assistance under this chapter. (d) A separate and distinct cause of action in favor of the state is hereby created, and the department may, without written consent, take direct civil action in any court of competent jurisdiction. A suit brought under this section need not be ancillary to or dependent upon any other action. (e) The department's right of recovery is limited to the amount of the cost of medical care services paid by the department. Other subrogation rights granted under this section are limited to the cost of the services provided.

____________________________________________________________________________________ AFFIDAVIT OF TIM BROADHURST -- EXHIBIT B - Page 1

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 198 Filed 02/21/2006 Page 12 of 23

MBD 148

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 267-2 Filed 01/31/2008 Page 148 of 153

Page 149: Doc 267-2 - Example legal fees audit by Stuart, Maue, Mitchell & James legal fees auditing firm (rebuttal also uploaded)

(f) The commissioner may waive the department's right of recovery in whole or in part when the commissioner finds that enforcement would tend to defeat the purpose of public assistance. (g) The department may designate an agent to collect funds the department has a right to recover from third parties under this section. The department shall use any funds collected to pay costs of administering the medical assistance program. (h) The department may adopt rules for the enforcement of its right of recovery. CREDIT(S) Acts 1979, 66th Leg., p. 2352, ch. 842, art. 1, § 1, eff. Sept. 1, 1979. Amended by Acts 1979, 66th Leg., p. 2436, ch. 842, art. 2, § 10, eff. Sept. 1, 1979.

____________________________________________________________________________________ AFFIDAVIT OF TIM BROADHURST -- EXHIBIT B - Page 2

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 198 Filed 02/21/2006 Page 13 of 23

MBD 149

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 267-2 Filed 01/31/2008 Page 149 of 153

Page 150: Doc 267-2 - Example legal fees audit by Stuart, Maue, Mitchell & James legal fees auditing firm (rebuttal also uploaded)

____________________________________________________________________________________ AFFIDAVIT OF TIM BROADHURST -- EXHIBIT C - Page 1

AFFIDAVIT OF BROADHURST, EXHIBIT "C" Source: Texas Register, Volume 19, Number 1, January 4, 1994, (entire issue) Pages 1-129 Available on-line at University of North Texas Libraries Texas Register Archive URL: http://texinfo.library.unt.edu/texasregister/1994.htm Texas Department of Health Texas Board of Health Third-Party Resources 25 TAC sec.sec.28.101, 28.111, 28.121, 28.131.....82 Chapter 28. Third-Party Resources Program Requirements 25 TAC sec.sec.28.101, 28.111, 28.121, and 28.131 On behalf of the State Medicaid Director, the Texas Department of Health (department) submits adopted new sec.sec.28.101, 28.111, 28.121, and 28.131 concerning Third Party Resources. The rules for the operation of the Third Party Resource Program were inadvertently repealed in 1990 with the adoption of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1990 nursing home standards. These sections are adopted without changes to the proposed text as published in the July 27, 1993 issue of the Texas Register (18 Tex Reg 4942). The new sections will enable the department to collect funds from third-party resources to reduce Medicaid cost. These sections describe Medicaid's right of assignment of funds paid by third-party resources and the provider's and recipient's rights for recovery of payments for medical expenses from third-party resources. Third-party resources include payments for both private and public health insurance and from other liable third parties that can be applied toward a Medicaid recipient's medical and health benefit expenses. One comment was received from the American Health Services, Inc. recommending that the state continue to "pay and chase" nursing home claims. The department made no changes as a result of the comment. The department, however, changed all references to the Department of Human Services to the Texas Department of Health to reflect the administrative transfer of these rules to the Texas Department of Health from the Department of Human Services. The amendments are adopted under the Human Resources Code, sec.32.021 and Texas Civil Statutes, Article 4413 (502), sec.16, which provides the Health and Human Services Commission with the authority to adopt rules to administer the state's medical assistance program and are submitted by the Texas Department of Health under its agreement with the

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 198 Filed 02/21/2006 Page 14 of 23

MBD 150

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 267-2 Filed 01/31/2008 Page 150 of 153

Page 151: Doc 267-2 - Example legal fees audit by Stuart, Maue, Mitchell & James legal fees auditing firm (rebuttal also uploaded)

____________________________________________________________________________________ AFFIDAVIT OF TIM BROADHURST -- EXHIBIT C - Page 2

Health and Human Services Commission to operate the purchased health services program and as authorized under Chapter 15, sec.1.07, Acts of the 72nd Legislature, First Called Session (1991). sec.28.101. Basis and Scope. (a) Reimbursement from third-party resources for medical care services paid on behalf of a Texas Medical Assistance (Medicaid) Program recipient is assigned to the Texas Department of Health (department) or its health insuring agent under Human Resources Code sec.32.033. Third-party resources include, but are not limited to, the following: (1) health and accident insurance; (2) workers' compensation; (3) casualty insurance including uninsured/underinsured motorist coverage; (4) assignable indemnity contracts; (5) health maintenance organizations; (6) Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) health plans;

(7) no-fault automobile insurance including Personal Injury Protection (PIP) and automobile medical insurance;

(8) another person for personal injury caused by that person's negligence or wrong; and

(9) any claim filed on behalf of or payment made to a Medicaid recipient for injuries requiring Medicaid services including payments for mental anguish, pain and suffering, and future medical expenses when the injury causing the need for Medicaid services was the basis for those claims or payments.

(b) The right of recovery by the department is limited to the amount of the cost of medical services paid by the department or its health insuring agent on behalf of the recipient. Amounts available from third-party resources in excess of payments made by the department or its health insuring agent are available to the recipient. (c) The right of recovery by the department includes any amounts paid to a recipient's parent or legal guardian for Medicaid-covered services. sec.28.111. Provider Right of Recovery.

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 198 Filed 02/21/2006 Page 15 of 23

MBD 151

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 267-2 Filed 01/31/2008 Page 151 of 153

Page 152: Doc 267-2 - Example legal fees audit by Stuart, Maue, Mitchell & James legal fees auditing firm (rebuttal also uploaded)

____________________________________________________________________________________ AFFIDAVIT OF TIM BROADHURST -- EXHIBIT C - Page 3

(a) The Texas Medical Assistance (Medicaid) Program pays medical claims only after all other available resources have been exhausted. (b) Medicaid providers must collect and/or recover funds from any source to which the Texas Department of Health (department) has a right of recovery under sec.28.101 of this title (relating to Basis and Scope), before submitting Medicaid claims for reimbursement. (c) The department authorizes Medicaid providers to collect and/or recover funds for recipients' medical expenses claimed from any other source. (d) When the payment by a third-party resource is equal to or greater than the amount allowable by the department or its health insuring agent for covered services, Medicaid recipients are not liable for charges billed in excess of the amount paid by the third-party for the medical care and services within the amount, duration, and scope of benefits provided by Medicaid. sec.28.121. Recipient Right of Recovery. (a) The Texas Department of Health (the department) is not responsible for pursuing claims against third-party resources outside the limits of the recovery that the department is authorized to seek. The recipient is responsible for pursuing these claims. (b) The department's right of recovery does not include recovery from the following:

(1) Texas Rehabilitation Commission;

(2) Texas Commission for the Blind;

(3) Texas Kidney Health Care Program;

(4) Muscular Dystrophy Association;

(5) Chronically Ill and Disabled Children's Services;

(6) Texas Band of Kickapoo Equity Health Program;

(7) Maternal and Child Health (Title V);

(8) State Legislative Impact Assistance Grant (SLIAG);

(9) Crime Victim's Compensation Program; and

(10) adoption agencies or adopting parents with medical contractual obligations to the Medicaid client.

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 198 Filed 02/21/2006 Page 16 of 23

MBD 152

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 267-2 Filed 01/31/2008 Page 152 of 153

Page 153: Doc 267-2 - Example legal fees audit by Stuart, Maue, Mitchell & James legal fees auditing firm (rebuttal also uploaded)

____________________________________________________________________________________ AFFIDAVIT OF TIM BROADHURST -- EXHIBIT C - Page 4

sec.28.131. Notice of Assignment. (a) The Texas Department of Health (department) will provide information about third-party resources for individual recipients on the monthly medical care identification card. This information includes a code indicating whether the recipient has a third-party resource. Recipients must sign a statement on the back of the card acknowledging that they are aware that assignment of third-party resources has been made to the department, and they must show the card to Texas Medical Assistance (Medicaid) Program providers before receiving medical services. (b) Medicaid providers must indicate on the third-party resources claim form that the recipient has Medicaid coverage and must indicate the recipient's individual identification number. (c) Medicaid payments and reasonable attorney fees, not to exceed 10% of the recouped amount, may be recouped from a provider who was aware of third-party resources when the services were provided. (d) Neither the department, nor its health insuring agent will seek to recover from third-party resources any payments made to the recipient in good-faith prior to the department's notification of claim. (e) Notification by the department of its right of assignment, as authorized under Article 3.76 of the Insurance Code, is made when the department's claim is submitted to the third-party. (f) If a recipient, an insurer, agent, or attorney receives a notice of assignment and then releases funds without paying Medicaid's claim, they are liable to the department for the full amount of the Medicaid claim plus reasonable attorney fees necessary for recovering the money. This agency hereby certifies that the rule as adopted has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority. Issued in Austin, Texas, on December 27, 1993. TRD-9333961 Susan K. Steeg General Counsel Texas Department of Health Effective date: January 27, 1994 Proposal publication date: July 27, 1993 For further information, please call: (512) 338-6518

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 198 Filed 02/21/2006 Page 17 of 23

MBD 153

Case 4:01-cv-00567 Document 267-2 Filed 01/31/2008 Page 153 of 153