DHEP Seminar February 2, 2012

Gagan MohantyDHEP, TIFR

Personal Recollections from

DHEP Seminar July 29, 2013

Shall roughly follow the sequence given here

}Man-made

machines

2o Focus on what I found interesting, detailed at http://www-conf.slac.stanford.edu/lp13

}Man-made

machines

3

Let’s start with QCD

Inclusive jet and dijet measurements

}Man-made

machines

4

Complimentary to inclusive jet measurement m12 is the dijet invariant mass and y is half

the absolute rapidity difference between the two leading jets

Data and theory are in agreement to ~10% with various PDFs

H.D. Yoo

s keeps on running...

}Man-made

machines

5

Ratio of the inclusive 3-jet to inclusive 2-jet cross section (R32) with the average pT of the two leading jets (<pT1,2>) ranging between 0.42 and 1.39 TeV

First determination of s from measurements at a Q value above 0.6 TeV Good agreement with the world average value of s(mZ) = 0.11840.0007

®s(mZ) = 0:1148§ 0:0014(exp:) § 0:0018(PDF)+0:0050¡ 0:0000(scale)

Similar results from ATLAS

H.D. Yoo

A text-book plot from CMS

}Man-made

machines

6

ATLAS has got a similar story to tell

( NLO and NNLO)

}Man-made

machines

7

A bit on hadron spectroscopy

Mass (3871.680.17 MeV): Close toD0D*0 threshold

Width (< 1.2 MeV, CL=90%): Narrow

Production In pp/pp collisions – rate similar to charmonia

In B decays – KX similar to cc, K*X smaller than cc

Decay BF: open charm ~ 50%, charmonia ~ few %

Nature (very likely exotic) LooselyD0D*0 bound state (like deuteron)?

Mixture of excited c1 andD0D*0 bound state?

Many other possibilities: tetraquark etc.?

Find out JPC assignment out of the remaining two possibilities: 1++ and 2+ to pin down its nature

M(+J/) –M(J/) [GeV]

Discovered in 2003

What is the X(3872)?

X(3872)(2S)

8

C.Z. Yuan

9

313 26

JPC=2+ rejected at 8.2!

PRL 110, 222001 (2013)

JPC of the X(3872) is 1++

C.Z. Yuan

9

Discovery of a new particle – Zc(3900)

• M = 3899.03.64.9 MeV• = 461020 MeV• 307 48 events• Significance >8

C.Z. Yuan

10

What is Zc(3900)? Charged and couples to cc at least four-quark configuration

Clearly exotic – tetraquark, DD molecule, cusp…

PRL 110, 252002 (2013)PRL 110, 252001 (2013)

e+e +J/ at Ecm= 4.26 GeV e+e +J/ from ISR events

• M = 3894.56.64.5 MeV• = 632426 MeV• 159 49 events• Significance >5.2

}Man-made

machines

11

Charm, beauty and strange-beauty mesons

}Man-made

machines

12R. Oldeman

Probing CP violation in charm decays

Is it SM or NP? – a theorist prescription

}Man-made

machines

13

RSM is not expected to be greater than 1 for mc >> QCD, but not impossible if we treat the charm-quark to be light

J.F. Kamenik

Check:

Another enigma: semileptonic asymmetry

}Man-made

machines

14

R. Oldeman

Bottom-line:

Current status of the Unitarity triangle

}Man-made

machines

15

®=Á2 =¡88:5+4:7

¡ 4:4

¢±

M. Roney

A tantalizing result on B D()

}Man-made

machines

16

If the discrepancy with SM holds up, the result cannot be explained by type-II 2HDM; excluded over the full parameter space at 99.8% CL

But can be accommodated in more general extensions of type-III 2HDM

M. Roney

PRL 109, 101802 (2012)

BaBar

Type-II 2HDM

Bs +: almost like a litmus test

}Man-made

machines

17 Highly sensitive to extended Higgs model and MSSM at large tan region

G. Mancinelli

First evidence for Bs +

}Man-made

machines

18

Consistent with the SM expectation (3.28109) Set an upper limit on BF(B0 +) < 9.41010 at 95% confidence level

G. Mancinelli

Recently CMS also came with a bang!

}Man-made

machines

19

U. Langenegger at EPS2013

arXiv:1307.5025[hep-ex]

}Man-made

machines

20

Let’s now go behind the truth!

Why to worry about measuring the top mass?

}Man-made

machines

21

The top quark decays well before hadronizing, so one can directly measure its mass by reconstructing various decay products

Indeed, top is the most accurately measured quark (better than 0.5%)

Participates in the quantum loop radiative corrections to the W mass, constraining the Higgs mass (was important till July 2012 discovery)

Now one can use this measurement to assess the self-consistency of SM

The huge mass (almost same as the tungsten atom) puts it close to the scale of EWSB, so the top quark might have a special role in it

So far the most sensitive method at LHC

}Man-made

machines

22

A. Castro

LHC average for the top mass

}Man-made

machines

23

What about Tevatron?

A. Castro

An unsettled question from Tevatron

}Man-made

machines

24

Thanks to pp environment, one can measure the forward-backward asymmetry AFB

J. Varela

}Man-made

machines

25

Story so far from the LHC Being a pp machine, LHC does not allow to measure AFB;

we can however measure the charge asymmetry Ac

J. Varela

Another SM candle: W mass

}Man-made

machines

26

Current WA is dominated by Tevatron and has a precision of 104B. Quinn

A picture perfect for ILC enthusiasts

}Man-made

machines

27

B. Quinn

Probing BSM with charged leptons

}Man-made

machines

Great prospect ahead to further pin down cLFV with the MEG upgrade, Mu2e, COMET, Project X and Belle II

28

Now

Prohibitively small in SM+mass, so constitutes a clean BSM probe

S. Mihara

Neutrino mixing phenomenology

}Man-made

machines

29

S. Pascoli

One of the highlighted results on s: sin2(13)

}Man-made

machines

30

Y.F. Wang

}Man-made

machines

31

Now to the discovery of the decade!

The decay H → γγ: two approaches

Cut-based

Each event category is weighted by its S/(S+B)

only for visualization purposes 32

MVA method is the nominal one while the cut-based approach is there for the cross-check purpose

MVA mass-factorized

A. De Roeck

M(4l)>160 GeV Data 380 evts MC 364.5 evts

(pp ZZ, 8TeV) = 8.41.0 (stat.) 0.7 (syst.) 0.4(lum.) pbClean signal peak at ~126

GeV

Good control of the dominant ZZ background

sSM(th) = 7.8 0.6 pb

The decay H → ZZ → 4l

33

A. De Roeck

The decay H → WW → 2l+2νEvents with 0 jets and different flavour leptons (7+8 TeV Data)

34

Exclusion at 95% in the mass range 128-600 GeVLarge excess (4 observed, 5.1 expected at mH 125 GeV) in the low mass region

A. De Roeck

Summary of the five main channels

bb: includes VH and VBFWW: includes ggF, VH, VBF

For a mass of mH = 125.7 GeV CMS-PAS-HIG-13-005

3.4s

35

Current result

Discovery paper

Expected Observed

3.8 3.2

2.8 4.1

2.4 1.6

1.9 0.7

1.4 0.0

PLB 716, 30-61 (2012)

A. De Roeck

Mass of the new boson

mH = 125.7 ± 0.3(stat) ± 0.3(syst) GeV = 125.7 ± 0.4 GeV

H ZZ4l: mH = 125.8 ± 0.5 (stat.) ±0.2 (syst.) GeV

H γγ: mH = 125.4 ± 0.5 (stat.) ±0.6 (syst.) GeV

Signal strengthversus mass

36

A. De Roeck

Couplings to fermions and gauge bosons

Overall result

Contributions from all decay channels

Results within 1σ of the SM prediction

For mH = 125.7 GeV

G(H ) gg ~ | a kV + b kf|2

/ = -a b 0.2, GBSM = 0

37

A. De Roeck

Discriminant built to describe the kinematics of production and decay of different JP state of a "Higgs"

0+ vs 0-

CLs=0.16%

More JP hypotheses have been tested in a similar way

What about its spin and parity?

Spin/parity hypothesis tests: H → ZZ → 4l channel

38

A. De Roeck

Latest news on the Higgs from ATLAS

}Man-made

machines

7.4 6.6

3.8

1.1

K. Jakobs

ATLAS-CONF-2013-013

ATLAS-CONF-2012-161

39

Significances reported in the Discovery paper: 4.5, 3.6 and 2.8 for , ZZ and WW

PLB 716, 1-29 (2012)

How does the Higgs couple to SM particles?

}Man-made

machines

40

K. Jakobs

Is it a scalar or pseudo-scalar?

}Man-made

machines

41

K. Jakobs

How likely it is a tensor (2+) particle?

}Man-made

machines

42

K. Jakobs

}Man-made

machines

43

Anything else I found interesting?

}Man-made

machines

44

C. Galbiati

M. Nicola

P. Zuccon

P. Privetera

44