Development of a Preliminary Engineering Design for the ... · PDF fileBusiness Divisions of...
Transcript of Development of a Preliminary Engineering Design for the ... · PDF fileBusiness Divisions of...
2
Presentation Overview
Market forces for use of high quality base oils
Demand drives for use of high quality base oils
Next generation Group III base stock,
YUBASE plus
Physical-chemical properties of YUBASE plus
Blending study results with YUBASE plus
Bench test and Engine test results
Summary
Introduction of SK Energy
3
SK Group Overview
Energy
&
Chemicals
Telecom
Trading
&
Services
Holding
Company• SK Corporation
• SK Energy
• SK E&S
• SK Chemicals
• SKC
• Dopco
• K-Power
• SK Telecom
• SK C&C
• SK Telink
• SK Telesys
• Helio
• SK Networks
• SK Engineering & Construction
• SK Shipping
• Sheraton Walkerhill
• SK Securities
• Sales : 73.7 billion USD
• Total Assets : 63.3 billion USD
• Employees : About 30,000
Sales Ratio
4
SK Energy Overview
History
Established in 1962 as Korea’s first domestic oil refining company.
Acquired by SK Group in 1982, and called YUKONG.
Name changed to SK Corporation in 1997.
Split into SK Holdings and SK Energy on July 1, 2007
Leading Energy & Petrochemical player in Korea
Largest refiner in Korea’s oil industry, holding over 1/3 of market
share, and leading Petrochemical, Lubricant player in Korea.
Globalization
SK Energy is in a transition phase, increasingly penetrating into
overseas markets with a view to becoming a major player in the
Asia-Pacific region.
SK Corporation (predecessor of SK Energy) has been ranked 98th
on Fortune Global 500 company list, 2007
1997- 2007
YUKONG
1982-1997
Korea Oil Company
1962-1982
Present
5
Business Divisions of SK Energy
Ethylene: 830,000 Ton/Yr
Propylene: 540,000 Ton/Yr
BTX: 3,600,000 Ton/Yr
Engaged in 24 blocks
in 14 countries
Oil equivalent reserves
: 510 million Bbl
Production(E) : 25,000 B/D
Lubricant: 200,000 MT/Y
Base Oil: 1,000,000 MT/Y
Grease: 6,000 MT/Y
Domestic market share: 34%
CDU capacity: 1,115 Mil B/D
Gas stations: 4,185
6
SK’s Base Oil Production History
1st
2nd
3rd
World largest Group III base oil manufacturer
Hydro-Cracked / CDW / All Hydro Processing Route
Total Group 3 Production Capacity is 750,000 MT/Y
350,000 MT/Y New Capacity from mid 2008
7
High Quality Base Oils
Low Volatility
Excellent Oxidation Stability
Excellent Low Temperature Fluidity
Inherent VI is above 120
4 main options of high quality base oils
- PAOs
- Di-esters
- Wax Isomerized Base Oils
- Severely Hydrocracked Base Oils
8
Global Base Oil Demand
Group III
Group II
Group I
4%2%
7~8%10~%
25,000
20,000
15,000
10,000
5,000
30,000
[KMT]
2000 2005 2010 2015
Source : SK Energy
9
Market Forces for Use of High Quality Base Oils
Legislation Consumers
OEMs
Lubricant
Manufacturers
Global
Economy
10
• Set Emission Target
• Reduce PM/NOx/SAPS
• Increase Fuel Economy
Demand Drives for Use of High Quality Base Oils
Legislation
Source: Lubrizol
OEMs
Euro 3
Euro 4
Euro 5
US Tier 2 bin 5
NOx (g/km)
PM
(g/km) Emissions Standards - Passenger Car Diesel -
11
• Set Emission Target
• Reduce PM/NOx/SAPS
• Increase Fuel Economy
Demand Drives for Use of High Quality Base Oils
Legislation
Source: Lubrizol
OEMs
ILSAC : Phosphorus Content Limit
GF-1:
0.12 max
1990 1995 2000 2005
P content
in oil
(wt%)
0.12
0.10
0.08
0.06
0.04
GF-2:
0.10 max
GF-3:
0.10 max
GF-4
0.08 max
12
• Set Emission Target
• Reduce PM/NOx/SAPS
• Increase Fuel Economy
Demand Drives for Use of High Quality Base Oils
Legislation
Source: Lubrizol
OEMs
ILSAC : Fuel Efficiency Requirement
Seq.VI F/E
improvement
%(vs.20W30)
SG
1990 1995 2000 2005
5
4
3
2
1
1
0
2
3
Seq.VIB F/E
improvement
%(vs.5W-30)
GF-1
GF-2
GF-3
5W-20 & 0W-20
5W-30 & 0W-30
10W-30
GF-4
13
• Set Emission Target
• Reduce PM/NOx/SAPS
• Increase Fuel Economy
Demand Drives for Use of High Quality Base Oils
• Newly Designed Engines
• Severer Operating Condition
• After-treatment Devices
Legislation
OEMs LubricantManufacturers
14
Demand Drives for Use of High Quality Base Oils
• Longer Drain Intervals
• Better Fuel Economy
• Price Efficiency
Consumer
LubricantManufacturers
15
Demand Drives for Use of High Quality Base Oils
Formulation
Cost Efficiency
‘Synthetic’ Claims
Product Differentiation
Operational Conveniences LubricantManufacturers
16
Refining Trends in Base Oil Composition
Chemical Type Structure VI Pour Oxidation Toxicity
Very High
~175
High
~150
Good
~130
Good
~130
Poor
~60
Poor
~60
Very Poor
<0
Solid
@50°C
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Excellent
Excellent
Excellent
Good
Medium
Medium
Very Poor
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Medium
Very High
n-Paraffin (Wax)
iso-Paraffins with
Branched chains
iso-Paraffins with
highly branched
chains (PAO's)
cyclo-Paraffin-
single ring with
long chains
Naphthenes, poly
condensed
Monoaromatics, l
ong chains
Polyaromatics
17
Technical Issues in the Manufacture of Base Oils
Base oil properties are controlled through feedstock selections and
manufacturing processes.
Refiners continuously search for innovative ways to maximize
iso-paraffins and small-ring naphthenes:
- Increasing hydrocracker severity
- Waxy feeds
SAE 0W-20 and 0W-30 formulated fully with Group III base oils
tend to be borderline in terms of meeting both low temperature
viscometrics and volatility requirements so PAO is needed.
18
The most cost effective in high quality base oils
Provide the best overall performance in lubricant products
Classified as API Group III base oil
Limited to getting higher VI Group III base oils at practical yield in existing Hydrocracking routes
High Quality Base Oils from Fuels Hydrocracker Residues
Technical Issues in the Manufacture of Base Oils
19
Higher VI Group III Base Oils from Fuels hydrocracker residues
Atmospheric
ResidueFuels
Hydrocracker
VGO
Vacuum
Distillation
Vacuum Stripping
Hydrocracker
Residues
Hydro-
treating
70D
100D
180D
250D
YUBASE plus
Hydrocracker
Residues
Hydro-finishing
Vacuum
Distillation
Vacuum stripping
Catalytic
Dewaxing
Fuels
Next Generation of Group III Base Stock
20
Next Generation of Group III Base Stock
SK’s No.3 LBO Plant in
Dumai on Sumatra Island,
Indonesia
Adopted same technology,
SK UCO lube process
Higher VI Group III base
stocks from fuels
hydrocracker residues
Annual Production :
About 350k Metric Tons
YUBASE plus
Dumai
Ulsan
21
Physical - Chemical Properties of YUBASE plus
Physical properties, YUBASE slate
YU-4 plus YU-4 YU-6 plus YU-6
Vis. @40℃, cSt 18.4 19.5 35.4 36.9
Vis. @100℃, cSt 4.20 4.22 6.65 6.48
Viscosity Index 136 122 146 130
Pour Point, ℃ -18 -15 -12 -12
CCS @-25℃, cP - - 2420 2920
CCS @-30℃, cP 1190 1590 4160 5200
Noack (A), wt% 13.5 15.2 4.1 7.5
22
Comparison of CCS and volatility, 4cSt
[CCS Vis. @-30℃, cP]
1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800
PAO
GTL
YUBASE plus
Group Ⅲ d
Group Ⅲ c
Group Ⅲ b
Group Ⅲ a
[Noack Volatility, wt%]
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
Physical - Chemical Properties of YUBASE plus
23
Chemical properties, Composition
■ 3-Ring + Naph.
■ 1&2-Ring Naph.
■ Paraffins
2005
100
80
60
40
20
[wt%]
YU-4 plus YU-6 plus SWI-5 Test Method:
GC-Mass Spectroscopy
Physical - Chemical Properties of YUBASE plus
24
Low temperature properties, MRV
- LTLS Property, MRV (Base Oils with 0.3 wt% PPD)
[cP]
20,000
16,000
12,000
8,000
4,000
0
1,737
4,707
16,800
1,235 2,824
8,969
1,633
5,468
17,210
1,170
3,816
14,118
4,295
YU-4
YU-4 plus
YU-6
YU-6 plus
SWI-5
-25 -30 -35 -40
[℃]
Physical - Chemical Properties of YUBASE plus
25
Solvency properties
Storage stability in
finished engine oils
54℃
- No haze
- No precipitation
- No separation
15℃
0℃
-18℃
YUBASE
YUBASE plus
[PS
N
um
be
r, m
l]
13.5
13.0
12.5
14.5
15.5
14.0
15.0
16.0
4 cSt 6 cSt
Physical - Chemical Properties of YUBASE plus
26
Blending Study Results with YUBASE plus
SAE 0W-20, API SM / ILSAC GF-4 PCMO
Formula [wt%]
YUBASE 4
YUBASE 4 plus
100N (Group II)
PAO-4
YUBASE 6
VII
Additives
Properties
Vis. @40℃, cSt
Vis. @100℃, cSt
Viscosity Index
CCS @-35℃, cP
Noack (A), wt%
HTHS Viscosity, cP
72.75
-
-
10.00
-
7.00
balance
-
82.75
-
-
-
7.00
balance
-
63.75
20.00
-
-
7.00
balance
-
63.75
-
-
20.00
6.00
balance
43.0
8.33
174
5,760
13.2
2.63
40.9
8.21
181
4,560
12.3
-
43.5
8.38
173
5,830
11.5
2.69
43.4
8.40
173
5,390
14.6
2.68
B C D E
< 6200
< 15.0
> 2.60
A
82.75
-
-
-
-
7.00
balance
43.5
8.41
173
6,250
14.4
-
27
Blending Study Results with YUBASE plus
SAE 0W-30, API SM/ ILSAC GF-4 PCMO
Formula [wt%] A B
YUBASE 4 67.70 -
YUBASE 4 plus - 77.70
PAO-4 10.00 -
VII 10.00 10.00
Additives balance balance
Vis. @40℃, cSt 57.6 56.0
Vis. @100℃, cSt 10.64 10.52 9.3 ~ <12.5
Viscosity Index 178 181
CCS @-35℃, cP 5,980 5,770 Max. 6,200
Noack (A), wt% 12.3 11.5 Max. 15.0
HTHS Viscosity, cP 3.09 3.08 Min. 2.9
Properties
28
Blending Study Results with YUBASE plus
SAE 5W-30, API SM/CF, ACEA A5/B5-04 PCDO
Formula [wt%] A B
YUBASE 4 78.30 -
YUBASE 4 plus - 54.40
YUBASE 6 - 25.00
VII 9.10 8.00
Additives balance balance
Vis. @40℃, cSt 58.5 58.4 -
Vis. @100℃, cSt 10.49 10.50 9.3~<12.5
Viscosity Index 171 172 -
CCS @-30℃, cP 4,110 4,130 Max. 6,600
Noack (A), wt% 12.8 10.1 Max. 13.0
HTHS, cP 3.09 3.13 2.9~3.5
Properties
29
Blending Study Results with YUBASE plus
SAE 5W-40, API SM/CF, ACEA A3/B3/B4/C3-04 PCDO
Formula [wt%] A B C
YUBASE 4 55.60 - 38.90
YUBASE 4 plus - 38.40 16.70
YUBASE 6 19.20 37.20 19.20
VII 12.60 11.80 12.60
Additives balance balance balance
Vis. @40℃, cSt 82.1 81.8 81.0
Vis. @100℃, cSt 13.84 13.79 13.81 12.5~<16.3
Viscosity Index 174 174 176
CCS @-30℃, cP 5,600 5,570 5,180 Max. 6,600
MRV @-35℃, cP 35,500 32,540 30,610 Max. 60,000
Noack (A), wt% 11.1 9.5 9.7 Max. 13.0
HTHS, cP 3.71 3.72 3.72 Min. 3.5
Properties
30
Bench Test Results
Friction property, HFRR charts in 5W-40 PCDO
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
0.35
0.4
0.45
0.5
0 300 600 900 1200 1500 1800
Time (secs)
Fri
cti
on
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
Tem
p
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
0.35
0.4
0.45
0.5
0 300 600 900 1200 1500 1800
Time (secs)
Fri
cti
on
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
Tem
p
In essence, both oils performed
similarly, including the wear scar
average
YUBASE plus based oil sample
shows marginally thicker oil film
and lower friction coefficient
YU-4 Step1 Step2 Step3 Step4 Step5 Step6
Friction 0.123 0.126 0.128 0.148 0.155 0.158
Film, μ 77.7 50.6 28.3 17.3 19.1 18.5
Temp. 40 60 80 100 120 140
YU-4 + Step1 Step2 Step3 Step4 Step5 Step6
Friction 0.119 0.112 0.120 0.146 0.148 0.152
Film, μ 73.4 77.6 34.7 22.4 18.8 17.8
Temp. 40 60 80 100 120 140
31
Bench Test Results
EHD oil film thickness in 5W-40 PCDO
40 oC
60 oC
80 oC
100 oC
YUBASE plus based oil sample
shows thicker oil film at low
rolling speeds at all temperatures
21nm
24.6nm
32
Bench Test Results
Soot dispersancy in 5W-40 PCDO
5W-40 with
YUBASE 4
5W-40 with
YUBASE 4 plus
[1/s]
0.01 0.1 1 10
[Paּs]
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
YUBASE plus based oil sample
shows better soot dispersancy
33
Bench Test Results
Seal compatibility in 5W-40 PCDO
YUBASE 4 plus based 5W-40 PCDO
Seal Type Results Limits
■ NBR 34, Nitrile Butadiene
- Hardness change, point -1 -8/+2
- Tensile strength, % -8.8 -20 max.
- Elongation at break, % -33 -35 max.
- Volume change, % 0.4 0/+10
■ AK 6, Viton
- Hardness change, point -1 ± 5
- Tensile strength, % -20 -50 max.
- Elongation at break, % -23 -55 max.
- Volume change, % 0.2 0/+5
■ ACM E7503, Acrylate pass
■ EAM D8948-200, Vamac pass
■ CEC L-39-T-96, Silicone (RE3-04) pass
34
Bench Test Results
Other bench test results in 5W-40 PCDO
High Temperature Deposit ILSAC GF-4 Limit
High Temperature Corrosion API CI-4 Limits
TEOST (MHT-4), mg 26.3 Max. 35
Copper Increase, ppm 7.0 Max. 20
Lead Increase, ppm 12.0 Max. 120
Tin Increase, ppm 0 Max. 50
Copper strip rating (D 130) 1b Max. 3
35
Base Oil Interchangeability
Base Oil Interchange Guideline for API SM/ ILSAC GF-4
From/To GP I GP II GP III GP IV
GP I
≤30%d, VIB>30% and ≤50%d
All except IVAc, VG, VIII>50%d, All except IVAcj, VGj VIII
GP II
≤30%d, VIB>30% and ≤50%d
All except IVAc, VG, VIII>50%d, All except IVAcj, VGj, VIII
GP IIIAll except
VIBh,i, IVAc, VIIIAll except
VIBh,i, IVAc, VIIIAll except
IVAcj , VGj, VIIIj, VIBh,i,j,k
≤30%d, IVAc, VG, VIB
>30%d, All
GP IV≤30%d, IVAc, VG, VIB
>30%d, All
BRT (O, all)
IIIG (O, all)
IVA (X,c)
VG (X)
VIB (O, k)
VIII (X)
c Test not required provided the new candidate oil’s base oil blend viscosity at 100°C is greater than or equal to
the base oil viscosity of the original candidate oil, within the precision of the test.
d Represents mass percentage of the PCMO formulation.
h Test not required provided the CCS viscosity of the new candidate oil is less than or equal to the CCS
viscosity of the original candidate oil, within the precision of the test.
I Test not required provided the HTHS viscosity of the new candidate oil is less than or equal to the HTHS
viscosity of the original candidate oil, within the precision of the test.
j Data set used to establish the BOI guidelines is based on a base oil VI range up to 126 VI, within the
precision of the test.
k VI of the base oil blend must be less than or equal to the VI of the base oil blend of the original candidate oil,
within the precision of the test.
36
Base Oil Interchangeability
Sequence IIIG Test Results for BOI of API SM/GF-4
Seq. IIIG Results
YUBASE 4 65.86 - -
YUBASE 4 plus - 65.86 46.31
YUBASE 6 15.09 15.09 36.38
VII 9.25 9.25 7.50
Additives balance balance balance
Viscosity Incr. @%40C 76.4 50.8 47.3 150 max
Average Cam+Lifter wear 32.4 22.2 32.6 60 max
Weight Piston Deposits 3.24 (*) 4.01 3.77 3.5 min
Oil Consumption 3.21 2.91 2.81 4.65 max
Formula [wt%] A B C
Physical Characteristics
Viscosity @100℃, cSt 10.84 10.33 10.01
CCS @-30℃, cP 4820 3310 4090
CCS @-35℃, cP 9290 6050 8010
(*) Formulation A was passed in original program. But showed different result in this study due to different severity between testing laboratories and testing time,
37
Base Oil Interchangeability
Sequence VIB Test Results for BOI of API SM/GF-4
Seq.VIB Results
YUBASE4 65.86 - -
YUBASE 4 plus - 65.86 60.65
YUBASE 6 14.51 14.51 20.21
VII 9.25 9.25 8.75
Additives balance balance balance
FEI 1, % 1.7 (*) 2.0 2.0 1.8 min
FEI 2, % 1.2 (*) 1.3 1.5 1.5 min
Formula [wt%] A B C
Physical Characteristics
Viscosity @100℃, cSt 10.73 10.01 9.93
CCS @-30℃, cP 4750 3120 3410
CCS @-35℃, cP 9230 5810 6457
(*) Formulation A was passed in original program. But showed different result in this study due to different severity between testing laboratories and testing time,
38
Base Oil Interchangeability
Ball Rust Test Result for BOI of API SM/GF-4
Seq.VIB Results
YUBASE4 65.86 - -
YUBASE 4 plus - 65.86 60.65
YUBASE 6 14.51 14.51 20.21
VII 9.25 9.25 8.75
Additives balance balance balance
Avg. Gray Value 131 126 137 100 min
Formula [wt%] A(5W-30) B (0W-30) C (5W-30)
Physical Characteristics
Viscosity @100℃, cSt 10.73 10.01 9.93
CCS @-30℃, cP 4750 3120 3410
CCS @-35℃, cP 9230 5810 6457
39
Base Oil Interchangeability
Demonstration Test Plan for ACEA Base Oil Interchange
ACEA A3/B3/B4/C3
ACEA A5/B5
SAE 5W-30
SAE 5W-40
TU5JP
Seq VG
TU3MS
M111SL
DV4 (or XUD11)
M111 FE
OM646LA (or OM 602A)
VW Tdi
Test Items
40
Summary
Base oil manufacturers continue to search for innovative ways to
maximize iso-paraffins and small-ring naphthenes in base oils
Higher VI Group III base stock, YUBASE plus
YUBASE plus is a higher VI Group III base stock from fuels
hydrocracker residues
YUBASE plus has superior properties in low temperature fluidity
and volatility
YUBASE plus can cut down PAO dosage in PCMO/ PCDO formulations
In API engine tests, YUBASE plus based oils showed better results,
and ACEA engine tests will be conducted to demonstrate Base Oil
Interchangeability between existing YUBASE and YUBASE plus