Developing Best Practices for Supplemental Materials
description
Transcript of Developing Best Practices for Supplemental Materials
![Page 1: Developing Best Practices for Supplemental Materials](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062410/5681638c550346895dd47ff7/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
SSP June 2, 2011
Developing Best Practices for
Supplemental MaterialsLinda BeebeJune 2, 2011
![Page 2: Developing Best Practices for Supplemental Materials](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062410/5681638c550346895dd47ff7/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
SSP June 2, 2011
Company Logo
COLLISION OF 2 WORLDS
![Page 3: Developing Best Practices for Supplemental Materials](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062410/5681638c550346895dd47ff7/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
SSP June 2, 2011
Explosion of─ResearchDataAccrued Knowledge
Increased RequirementsFunding BodiesReporting Standards
![Page 4: Developing Best Practices for Supplemental Materials](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062410/5681638c550346895dd47ff7/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
SSP June 2, 2011
Supplemental Materials—it sounded like such a good idea. The author could expand
on their research. Science would be better
with data needed to verify or replicate study at little additional cost.
We could enhance reporting of science with multi-media.
We looked to technology to solve problems—but kept our print-centric views.
And we did it on our own—no standards or best practices.
![Page 5: Developing Best Practices for Supplemental Materials](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062410/5681638c550346895dd47ff7/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
SSP June 2, 2011
Outcomes for the author?
May get to showcase new work that would not otherwise be seen.
May also risk displaying weak work that otherwise might not be seen.
![Page 6: Developing Best Practices for Supplemental Materials](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062410/5681638c550346895dd47ff7/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
SSP June 2, 2011
Outcomes for the user?Lack of descriptive
metadataDiscoverability issuesLack of contextConcern about persistenceNo clarity on citationsSome mystery in the main
article about what is supplemental
─ a maze, maybe not value-add taken as a whole.
![Page 7: Developing Best Practices for Supplemental Materials](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062410/5681638c550346895dd47ff7/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
SSP June 2, 2011
Outcomes for the publisher?
Direct costsDiverted energies—
already crisis in peer review
Tough decisions─What is value-add?Peer review dilemma,
quality vs workload?Plan for migration?
![Page 8: Developing Best Practices for Supplemental Materials](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062410/5681638c550346895dd47ff7/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
SSP June 2, 2011
NISO-NFAIS Working Group
![Page 9: Developing Best Practices for Supplemental Materials](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062410/5681638c550346895dd47ff7/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
SSP June 2, 2011
Business Working GroupCo-Chairs: Linda Beebe & Marie McVeigh Define Supplemental Materials, structurally and functionally. Define related terms, such as data, citation, and article. Recommend methods of referencing and linking to and from
supplemental material and for providing context. Recommendations around metadata, persistent identifiers,
and citations . Recommend processes for peer review, production, and
curation. Consider permissions and accessibility issues. Recommend responsibilities for authors, editors, peer
reviewers, publishers.
![Page 10: Developing Best Practices for Supplemental Materials](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062410/5681638c550346895dd47ff7/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
SSP June 2, 2011
Technical Working GroupCo-Chairs: Dave Martinsen & Sasha
Schwarzman Recommend metadata, persistent identifiers, and granularity
of markup needed to support practices recommended by the Business Working Group (BWG).
Recommend supports for referencing and linking to and from Supplemental Materials and for handling cited references within Supplemental Materials.
Recommend processes for archiving, preservation, and forward migration of various types of Supplemental Materials.
Recommend processes for packaging, exchange, and delivery of Supplemental Materials, taking into account variations in the location and hosting of those materials.
Recommend technical support for accessibility practices recommended by the BWG.
![Page 11: Developing Best Practices for Supplemental Materials](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062410/5681638c550346895dd47ff7/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
SSP June 2, 2011
On Different Wave LengthsDisciplines vary in use of supplemental material.Differ in style systems and culture.Readers vary in need for information—some
current awareness, some deep digging.Different approaches to underlying data.Very different approaches to delivery systems.Technology enabled, but still using print.
![Page 12: Developing Best Practices for Supplemental Materials](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062410/5681638c550346895dd47ff7/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
SSP June 2, 2011
Data One Type of Supplemental
Example of evolving ecosystem. Print world—no datasets part of article.
For some, almost synonymous with supplemental.Journal articles—indeed whole journals—devoted to
data emerging. For these data are integral content.Management of data in general not within scope of
recommended practices.Address inclusion of data when published as
supplemental (with a little aside on sharing).
![Page 13: Developing Best Practices for Supplemental Materials](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062410/5681638c550346895dd47ff7/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
SSP June 2, 2011
Illustrates Discipline Variances
Some publishers—such as AAAS and ACS—require posting of data in a publicly accessible repository for replication.
Some publishers—such as AGU—identify acceptable repositories.
Some publishers—such as APA—currently say only that authors should provide data to researchers for verification.
More calls for transparency
![Page 14: Developing Best Practices for Supplemental Materials](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062410/5681638c550346895dd47ff7/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
SSP June 2, 2011
Data Sharing—the ideal & reality
What they say: PARSE study—84% of
scientists think it useful to link data to articles.
In Psychology, 80% say they share their data.
2008—Harvard faculty voted to require faculty to deposit data in Harvard repository.
What they do: Only 25% said their data
are openly available.
Only 20% actually do.
By 2011, only a fraction have done so.
Most ethics codes call for some level of sharing.
![Page 15: Developing Best Practices for Supplemental Materials](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062410/5681638c550346895dd47ff7/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
SSP June 2, 2011
Reasons for not sharing─
It takes time, may require extensive explanations of coding or just plain clean-up.
I’m not finished—I can get more articles.
Who will curate/protect it?
Will I be credited?
They have several fears— Loss of confidentialty Potential harm to
subjects Potential faulty re-
analyis May be proven wrong Loss of control
![Page 16: Developing Best Practices for Supplemental Materials](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062410/5681638c550346895dd47ff7/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
SSP June 2, 2011
What we are saying. . .
Collaborative sharing best
practice.
Requires clear metadata and explanations.
Professional ethics around
secondary analysis.
Particular concern for studies with
human participants.
![Page 17: Developing Best Practices for Supplemental Materials](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062410/5681638c550346895dd47ff7/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
SSP June 2, 2011
Multi-Media Another ExampleFive years ago, audio or video not possible in the
article.Today still generally supplemental.BUT some now incorporating in PDFs.Executables as part of the article?Expect much more interactive content.
![Page 18: Developing Best Practices for Supplemental Materials](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062410/5681638c550346895dd47ff7/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
SSP June 2, 2011
Supplemental Today, Not Tomorrow
“. . . over time the concept of supplemental material will gradually give way to a more modern concept of a hierarchical or layered presentation in which a reader can define what level of detail best fits their interests.”
−Emilie Markus, Editor-in-Chief, Cell
Article of tomorrow may be linked chunks, not a narrative.
![Page 19: Developing Best Practices for Supplemental Materials](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062410/5681638c550346895dd47ff7/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
SSP June 2, 2011
Challenges for PublishersExpectations Quality uber alles— Peer review all. Edit to same level as
article. Maintain all links. Assure migration.
Limiting Factors People resources Financial resources Technical resources
![Page 20: Developing Best Practices for Supplemental Materials](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062410/5681638c550346895dd47ff7/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
SSP June 2, 2011
We need some order now.
![Page 21: Developing Best Practices for Supplemental Materials](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062410/5681638c550346895dd47ff7/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
SSP June 2, 2011
Defined 3 Types of ContentIntegral. Critical to understanding the work reported, but technical issues prevent inclusion in the framework.
Additional Content. Expansion of core article, added detail and context; provides layered approach for readers.
Other Related Content. Content may add to the understanding or enable replication; generally hosted by others.
![Page 22: Developing Best Practices for Supplemental Materials](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062410/5681638c550346895dd47ff7/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
SSP June 2, 2011
Recommended Practices
Selecting
Editing
Assuring Findability
Citing
![Page 23: Developing Best Practices for Supplemental Materials](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062410/5681638c550346895dd47ff7/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
SSP June 2, 2011
What we are saying. . .Selecting• Review same level• Useful, relevant, not file drawer
Editing• Publisher/Editor determine.• Provide notice if not.
Assuring Findability• Consistency• Online TOC Reference• Indexing Coverage• Don’t hide!
Citing• Within article, cite & link as for a table.• Not in reference list for integral.
![Page 24: Developing Best Practices for Supplemental Materials](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062410/5681638c550346895dd47ff7/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
SSP June 2, 2011
More Recommendations
Providing Links & Context
Preserving
Assuring Accessibility
Rights Management
![Page 25: Developing Best Practices for Supplemental Materials](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062410/5681638c550346895dd47ff7/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
SSP June 2, 2011
What we are saying. . .Links & Context• Bi-directional if possible• Links must work!• Context is essential. What is this? Why here?
Preservation• Integral same level as article• Clarity on what can do.• Encourage authors to deposit elsewhere also.
Accessibility• Should be same level as article.• Strive for ideal, recognize difficulty.
Rights Management• Treat rights same way do for the article.• No authority for Other Related Content.
![Page 26: Developing Best Practices for Supplemental Materials](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062410/5681638c550346895dd47ff7/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
SSP June 2, 2011
2 Working Groups, 2 Roles
BWG—What? TWG—How?
![Page 27: Developing Best Practices for Supplemental Materials](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062410/5681638c550346895dd47ff7/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
SSP June 2, 2011
TWG Working Group Task Forces
Metadata—have strawman DTDLinking and persistent identifiersPackaging and exchangePreservation and archivingAccessibility
![Page 28: Developing Best Practices for Supplemental Materials](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062410/5681638c550346895dd47ff7/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
SSP June 2, 2011
Next Steps
Early summer
shareBWG
Sub-groups
over the summer
TWG Fall meld and refineBoth
![Page 29: Developing Best Practices for Supplemental Materials](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062410/5681638c550346895dd47ff7/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
SSP June 2, 2011
Final Set of PracticesApproved by NISO
and NFAIS.
Shared with the
community and
refined.
Serve as a temporary roadmap.
Living document for rapidly changing
environment.
![Page 30: Developing Best Practices for Supplemental Materials](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062410/5681638c550346895dd47ff7/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
SSP June 2, 2011
We welcome ideas!NISO—www.niso.orgTo see working groups:
www.niso.org/workrooms/supplementalAlso join the Business Stakeholders’ Group at
that page.NFAIS—www.nfais.org
![Page 31: Developing Best Practices for Supplemental Materials](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062410/5681638c550346895dd47ff7/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
SSP June 2, 2011
THANK YOU!
Linda BeebeSenior Director, PsycINFOAmerican Psychological [email protected]